Salience Insight, Inc.; F/K/A KD Paine & Partners, Inc.; a Subsidiary of News Group International Berlin, New Hampshire; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 26268 [2014-10255]

Download as PDF 26268 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 88 / Wednesday, May 7, 2014 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Office of Justice Programs [OJP (NIJ) Docket No. 1657] Draft Report and Recommendations Prepared by the Scientific Working Group on Digital Evidence (SWGDE) AGENCY: National Institute of Justice, DOJ. Notice and request for comments. ACTION: In an effort to obtain comments from interested parties, the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice, Scientific Working Group on Digital Evidence will make available to the general public the following three draft documents: (1) ‘‘Digital Forensics as a Forensic Science Discipline;’’ (2) ‘‘SWGDE Best Practices for Examining Magnetic Card Readers;’’ and (3) ‘‘SWGDE Best Practices for Forensic Audio.’’ The opportunity to provide comments on this document is open to law enforcement agencies, organizations, and all other stakeholders and interested parties. Those wishing to obtain and provide comments on the draft document under consideration are directed to the following Web site: https://www.swgde.org. DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 30, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Kashtan, by telephone at 202– 353–1856 [Note: this is not a toll-free telephone number], or by email at Patricia.Kashtan@usdoj.gov. SUMMARY: Greg Ridgeway, Acting Director, National Institute of Justice. [FR Doc. 2014–10376 Filed 5–6–14; 8:45 am] Conclusion After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. Department of Labor’s prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted. BILLING CODE 4410–18–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES [TA–W–85,019] Salience Insight, Inc.; F/K/A KD Paine & Partners, Inc.; a Subsidiary of News Group International Berlin, New Hampshire; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration By application dated March 25, 2014, a state workforce official requested administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding workers’ eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers and former VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:11 May 06, 2014 Jkt 232001 workers of the subject firm. The determination was issued on February 24, 2014. The subject firm is engaged in activity related to the supply of media measurement and analysis services. The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination based on the findings that the workers at the subject firm do not produce an article as defined by the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under the following circumstances: (1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered that the determination complained of was erroneous; (2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or (3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the decision. The request for reconsideration alleges that the negative determination is erroneous because it is based on a mistake in facts not previously considered. Specifically, the request states that ‘‘the firm produces computer software including but not limited to a produce known as dlyDashboard which an article under the Trade Act’’ and referenced U.S. Court of International Trade slip opinion 05–49 in support of the allegation. The Department has carefully reviewed the request for reconsideration and the existing record, and will conduct further investigation to determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. Signed at Washington, DC, this 11th day of April, 2014. Del Min Amy Chen, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2014–10255 Filed 5–6–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION Proposal Review; Notice of Meetings In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92– 463, as amended), the National Science PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Foundation (NSF) announces its intent to hold proposal review meetings throughout the year. The purpose of these meetings is to provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to the NSF for financial support. The agenda for each of these meetings is to review and evaluate proposals as part of the selection process for awards. The review and evaluation may also include assessment of the progress of awarded proposals. The majority of these meetings will take place at NSF, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, Virginia 22230. These meetings will be closed to the public. The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act. NSF will continue to review the agenda and merits of each meeting for overall compliance of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. These closed proposal review meetings will not be announced on an individual basis in the Federal Register. NSF intends to publish a notice similar to this on a quarterly basis. For an advance listing of the closed proposal review meetings that include the names of the proposal review panel and the time, date, place, and any information on changes, corrections, or cancellations, please visit the NSF Web site: https://www.nsf.gov/events/. This information may also be requested by telephoning, 703/292–8687. Dated: May 2, 2014. Suzanne Plimpton, Acting Committee Management Officer. [FR Doc. 2014–10443 Filed 5–6–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7555–01–P NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION Proposal Review Panel for Computing & Communication Foundations Notice of Meeting In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92– 463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting: Name: Proposal Review Panel for Science and Technology Centers—2013 Class (#1192) Site Visit Date/Time: June 15, 2014; 6:00 p.m.–9:00 p.m. June 16, 2014; 8:00 a.m.–8:00 p.m. June 17, 2014; 8:30 a.m.–3:00 p.m. Place: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM 07MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 88 (Wednesday, May 7, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 26268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10255]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-85,019]


Salience Insight, Inc.; F/K/A KD Paine & Partners, Inc.; a 
Subsidiary of News Group International Berlin, New Hampshire; Notice of 
Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By application dated March 25, 2014, a state workforce official 
requested administrative reconsideration of the negative determination 
regarding workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance 
(TAA) applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The 
determination was issued on February 24, 2014. The subject firm is 
engaged in activity related to the supply of media measurement and 
analysis services.
    The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination 
based on the findings that the workers at the subject firm do not 
produce an article as defined by the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under 
the following circumstances:
    (1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered 
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
    (2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on 
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
    (3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a 
misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of 
the decision.
    The request for reconsideration alleges that the negative 
determination is erroneous because it is based on a mistake in facts 
not previously considered. Specifically, the request states that ``the 
firm produces computer software including but not limited to a produce 
known as dlyDashboard which an article under the Trade Act'' and 
referenced U.S. Court of International Trade slip opinion 05-49 in 
support of the allegation.
    The Department has carefully reviewed the request for 
reconsideration and the existing record, and will conduct further 
investigation to determine if the workers meet the eligibility 
requirements of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. 
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, 
granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 11th day of April, 2014.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2014-10255 Filed 5-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.