Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 25162-25163 [2014-10143]

Download as PDF 25162 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 85 / Friday, May 2, 2014 / Notices ADAMS accession number for each document referenced in this document (if that document is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that a document is referenced. In addition, for the convenience of the reader, the ADAMS accession numbers are provided in a table in the section of this document entitled, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. • NRC’s PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Saxton, Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415– 0697; email: John.Saxton@nrc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Part 40 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) authorizes the NRC to issue a license to Strata Energy, Inc. (Strata) for its Ross Uranium In-Situ Recovery (ISR) Facility in Crook County, Wyoming. Under conditions in the license, the Source and Byproduct Materials License SUA–1601 authorizes Strata to operate its facilities as proposed in its license application, as amended, and to possess uranium source and byproduct material at the Ross ISR Facility. The NRC staff’s ROD that supports the NRC’s decision to approve Strata’s license application for the Ross ISR Facility and to issue the license is available in ADAMS under Accession No. ML14056A096. In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC’s ‘‘Rules of Practice,’’ the details with respect to this action, including the Safety Evaluation Report and accompanying documentation and license, are available electronically in the NRC Library at https://www.nrc.gov/ reading-rm/adams.html. From this site, you can access the NRC’s Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS), which provides text and image files of the NRC’s public documents. The ADAMS accession numbers for the documents related to this notice are: 1 Generic Environmental Impact Statement for In-Situ Leach Uranium Milling Facilities, May 2009 .......................................... 2 Strata Energy, Inc.’s Application, January 4, 2011 .................................................................................................................... 3 Supplemental Information, February 28, 2011 ........................................................................................................................... 4 Response to Request for Additional Information, March 30, 2012 ............................................................................................ 5 Response to Request for Additional Information, April 6, 2012 ................................................................................................. 6 Clarification to RAI Responses, August 10, 2012 ...................................................................................................................... 7 Technical Report Replacement Pages, January 18, 2013 ......................................................................................................... 8 Containment Barrier Wall Construction Update, October 14, 2013 ........................................................................................... 9 Safety Evaluation Report Suggested Corrections, October 17, 2013 ........................................................................................ 10 Technical Report Replacement Pages, February 19, 2014 ..................................................................................................... 11 Environmental Impact Statement for the Ross ISR Project in Crook County, Wyoming, Supplement to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for In-Situ Leach Uranium Milling Facilities, Draft Report for Public Comments, March 31, 2013. 12 Environmental Impact Statement for the Ross ISR Project in Crook County, Wyoming, Supplement to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for In-Situ Leach Uranium Milling Facilities, Final Report, February 28, 2014. 13 Programmatic Agreement for Protection of Cultural Resources, April 24, 2014 ..................................................................... 14 NRC Safety Evaluation Report, April 18, 2014 ........................................................................................................................ 15 Source and Byproduct Materials License SUA–1601, April 24, 2014 ...................................................................................... 15 NRC Staff’s Record of Decision, April 24, 2014 ....................................................................................................................... Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 24th day of April 2014. For The Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Andrew Persinko, Deputy Director, Decommissioning and Uranium Recovery Licensing Directorate, Division of Waste Management and Environmental Protection, Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs. [FR Doc. 2014–10133 Filed 5–1–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Proposed Collection; Comment Request Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC 20549. Extension: Rule 17Ab2–1, Form CA–1, SEC File No. 270–203, OMB Control No. 3235–0195. Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 VerDate Mar<15>2010 00:23 May 02, 2014 Jkt 232001 (‘‘PRA’’) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments on the collection of information provided for Rule 17Ab2–1 (17 CFR 240.17Ab2–1) and Form CA–1: Registration of Clearing Agencies (17 CFR 249b.200) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Exchange Act’’) (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.). The Commission plans to submit this existing collection of information to the Office of Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) for extension and approval. Rule 17Ab2–1 and Form CA–1 require clearing agencies to register with the Commission and to meet certain requirements with regard to, among other things, the clearing agency’s organization, capacities, and rules. The information is collected from the clearing agency upon the initial application for registration on Form CA–1. Thereafter, information is collected by amendment to the initial Form CA–1 when material changes in circumstances necessitate modification of the information previously provided to the Commission. PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 ML091530075 ML110120063 ML110800187 ML121030404 ML121020343 ML12227A369 ML130370654 ML13295A230 ML13296A026 ML14065A092 ML13078A036 ML14056A096 ML14111A346 ML14108A088 ML14069A315 ML14073A107 The Commission uses the information disclosed on Form CA–1 to (i) determine whether an applicant meets the standards for registration set forth in Section 17A of the Exchange Act, (ii) enforce compliance with the Exchange Act’s registration requirement, and (iii) provide information about specific registered clearing agencies for compliance and investigatory purposes. Without Rule 17Ab2–1, the Commission could not perform these duties as statutorily required. The Commission staff estimates that each initial Form CA–1 requires approximately 130 hours to complete and submit for approval. This burden is composed primarily of a one-time reporting burden that reflects the applicant’s staff time (i.e. internal labor costs) to prepare and submit the Form to the Commission. Hours required for amendments to Form CA–1 that must be submitted to the Commission in connection with material changes to the initial CA–1 can vary, depending upon the nature and extent of the amendment. Since the Commission only receives an average of one submission per year, the aggregate annual burden associated with E:\FR\FM\02MYN1.SGM 02MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 85 / Friday, May 2, 2014 / Notices compliance with Rule 17Ab2–1 and Form CA–1 is 130 hours. The main cost to respondents is associated with generating, maintaining, and providing the information sought by Form CA–1. The external costs associated with such activities include fees charged by outside lawyers and accountants to assist the registrant collect and prepare the information sought by the form (though such consultations are not required by the Commission) and are estimated to be approximately $19,029. The rule and form do not involve the collection of confidential information. Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission’s estimates of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 days of this publication. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Please direct your written comments to: Thomas Bayer, Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi PavlikSimon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, or send an email to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov. Dated: April 29, 2014. Kevin M. O’Neill, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2014–10143 Filed 5–1–14; 8:45 am] mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–72036; File No. SR–ICC– 2014–04] Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE Clear Credit LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change to Make Revisions Consistent with U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (‘‘CFTC’’) Recommendations April 28, 2014. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on April 16, 2014, ICE Clear Credit LLC (‘‘ICC’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared primarily by ICC. ICC filed the proposal pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) 3 of the Act, and Rule 19b–4(f)(3) 4 thereunder, so that the proposal was effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The purpose of this proposed rule change is to amend the ICC Clearing Rules (the ‘‘Rules’’) in order to make revisions consistent with CFTC recommendations. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, ICC included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received regarding the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. ICC has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of these statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change The proposed revisions are intended to make revisions consistent with CFTC U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. 3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(3). 25163 recommendations. The proposed changes in the ICC Rules reflect conforming changes and drafting clarifications, and do not affect the substance of the ICC Rules or forms of cleared products. ICC believes such changes will facilitate the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of securities transactions and derivative agreements, contracts, and transactions for which it is responsible. The proposed Rule revisions are described in detail as follows. In Rule 702(e)(i), the term ‘‘Chief Compliance Officer for CDS’’ was revised to ‘‘chief compliance officer for CDS’’ in order to avoid confusion between the defined term referring to ICC’s Chief Compliance Officer and the chief compliance officer who is in charge of credit default swaps (‘‘CDS’’) at an ICC Clearing Participant. In Rule 702(e)(i)(2),5 the reference to ‘‘(see footnote above)’’ was deleted, as there is no footnote and the reference was made in error. In Rules 705(a) and 705(c), date of ‘‘service’’ was removed and replaced with date of ‘‘delivery’’ to provide clarity in the determination of the operative date. Similarly, in Rule 706, date of ‘‘service’’ was removed and replaced with date of ‘‘receipt’’ to provide clarity in the determination of the operative date. In Rules 903(a)(iii), 903(a)(iv), and 903(viii)(C), references to ‘‘ICE Clear Credit LLC’’ were updated to ‘‘ICE Clear Credit’’ in order to remain consistent with the usage of the defined term ‘‘ICE Clear Credit’’ in the Rules. Rule 2101–01(b) was amended to reflect current ICC practices regarding maintenance of Regional CDS Committee Member names and contact information. In the unlikely event that ICC needs to constitute a Regional CDS Committee, ICC staff would have adequate time to reach out to each CP to request contact information for the authorized representative who will serve on such Regional CDS Committee. Thus, Rule 2101–01(b) was updated to provided that each CP that is a Regional CDS Participant shall, ‘‘upon request, promptly’’ notify ICC of the identity of its authorized representative and provide contact information. Correspondingly, language stating that ICC maintains records of the Regional CDS Committee members’ names and contact information was removed. 1 15 2 17 VerDate Mar<15>2010 00:23 May 02, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 4703 5 In ICC’s filing, it referenced Rule 702(e)(2). Following confirmation from ICC, Staff has changed this reference to Rule 702(e)(i)(2). Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02MYN1.SGM 02MYN1

Agencies

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 85 (Friday, May 2, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25162-25163]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10143]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC 
20549.

Extension:
    Rule 17Ab2-1, Form CA-1, SEC File No. 270-203, OMB Control No. 
3235-0195.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (``PRA'') (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of 
information provided for Rule 17Ab2-1 (17 CFR 240.17Ab2-1) and Form CA-
1: Registration of Clearing Agencies (17 CFR 249b.200) under the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act'') (15 U.S.C. 78a et 
seq.). The Commission plans to submit this existing collection of 
information to the Office of Management and Budget (``OMB'') for 
extension and approval.
    Rule 17Ab2-1 and Form CA-1 require clearing agencies to register 
with the Commission and to meet certain requirements with regard to, 
among other things, the clearing agency's organization, capacities, and 
rules. The information is collected from the clearing agency upon the 
initial application for registration on Form CA-1. Thereafter, 
information is collected by amendment to the initial Form CA-1 when 
material changes in circumstances necessitate modification of the 
information previously provided to the Commission.
    The Commission uses the information disclosed on Form CA-1 to (i) 
determine whether an applicant meets the standards for registration set 
forth in Section 17A of the Exchange Act, (ii) enforce compliance with 
the Exchange Act's registration requirement, and (iii) provide 
information about specific registered clearing agencies for compliance 
and investigatory purposes. Without Rule 17Ab2-1, the Commission could 
not perform these duties as statutorily required.
    The Commission staff estimates that each initial Form CA-1 requires 
approximately 130 hours to complete and submit for approval. This 
burden is composed primarily of a one-time reporting burden that 
reflects the applicant's staff time (i.e. internal labor costs) to 
prepare and submit the Form to the Commission. Hours required for 
amendments to Form CA-1 that must be submitted to the Commission in 
connection with material changes to the initial CA-1 can vary, 
depending upon the nature and extent of the amendment. Since the 
Commission only receives an average of one submission per year, the 
aggregate annual burden associated with

[[Page 25163]]

compliance with Rule 17Ab2-1 and Form CA-1 is 130 hours. The main cost 
to respondents is associated with generating, maintaining, and 
providing the information sought by Form CA-1. The external costs 
associated with such activities include fees charged by outside lawyers 
and accountants to assist the registrant collect and prepare the 
information sought by the form (though such consultations are not 
required by the Commission) and are estimated to be approximately 
$19,029. The rule and form do not involve the collection of 
confidential information.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the Commission, including whether the information 
shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's 
estimates of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) 
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to 
be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of 
information on respondents, including through the use of automated 
collection techniques or other forms of information technology. 
Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in 
writing within 60 days of this publication.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number.
    Please direct your written comments to: Thomas Bayer, Director/
Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi 
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, or send an email 
to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.

    Dated: April 29, 2014.
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-10143 Filed 5-1-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.