Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review, 24670-24672 [2014-10021]

Download as PDF 24670 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 84 / Thursday, May 1, 2014 / Notices SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On February 3, 2014, based on a timely request for review by M&B Metal Products Company, Inc., Innovative Fabrication LLC/Indy Hanger and US Hanger Company, LLC (collectively ‘‘Petitioners’’), the Department published in the Federal Register a notice of initiation of an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on steel wire garment hangers for 27 companies, covering the period August 2, 2012, through November 30, 2013.1 On April 3, 2014, Petitioners withdrew their request for an administrative review of these 27 companies. Rescission of Review Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Department will rescind an administrative review if the party that requested the review withdraws its request within 90 days of the publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. Petitioners withdrew their request within the 90day deadline. No other party requested an administrative review of the antidumping duty order. As a result, we are rescinding the administrative review of steel wire garment hangers from Taiwan for the POR. duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). Dated: April 22, 2014. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2014–10011 Filed 4–30–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Assessment The Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. Because the Department is rescinding this administrative review in its entirety, the entries to which this administrative review pertained shall be assessed antidumping duties at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication of this notice. International Trade Administration Notifications This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department’s presumption that reimbursement of the antidumping Background 1 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 79 FR 6147 (February 3, 2014). VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:30 Apr 30, 2014 Jkt 232001 Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–4735. AGENCY: Each year during the anniversary month of the publication of an antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation, an interested party, as defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), may request, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213, that the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) conduct an administrative review of that antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation. PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 All deadlines for the submission of comments or actions by the Department discussed below refer to the number of calendar days from the applicable starting date. Respondent Selection In the event the Department limits the number of respondents for individual examination for administrative reviews initiated pursuant to requests made for the orders identified below, the Department intends to select respondents based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S. imports during the period of review. We intend to release the CBP data under Administrative Protective Order (‘‘APO’’) to all parties having an APO within five days of publication of the initiation notice and to make our decision regarding respondent selection within 21 days of publication of the initiation Federal Register notice. Therefore, we encourage all parties interested in commenting on respondent selection to submit their APO applications on the date of publication of the initiation notice, or as soon thereafter as possible. The Department invites comments regarding the CBP data and respondent selection within five days of placement of the CBP data on the record of the review. In the event the Department decides it is necessary to limit individual examination of respondents and conduct respondent selection under section 777A(c)(2) of the Act: In general, the Department has found that determinations concerning whether particular companies should be ‘‘collapsed’’ (i.e., treated as a single entity for purposes of calculating antidumping duty rates) require a substantial amount of detailed information and analysis, which often require follow-up questions and analysis. Accordingly, the Department will not conduct collapsing analyses at the respondent selection phase of this review and will not collapse companies at the respondent selection phase unless there has been a determination to collapse certain companies in a previous segment of this antidumping proceeding (i.e., investigation, administrative review, new shipper review or changed circumstances review). For any company subject to this review, if the Department determined, or continued to treat, that company as collapsed with others, the Department will assume that such companies continue to operate in the same manner and will collapse them for respondent selection purposes. Otherwise, the Department will not collapse companies for purposes of respondent selection. E:\FR\FM\01MYN1.SGM 01MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 84 / Thursday, May 1, 2014 / Notices Parties are requested to (a) identify which companies subject to review previously were collapsed, and (b) provide a citation to the proceeding in which they were collapsed. Further, if companies are requested to complete the Quantity and Value Questionnaire for purposes of respondent selection, in general each company must report volume and value data separately for itself. Parties should not include data for any other party, even if they believe they should be treated as a single entity with that other party. If a company was collapsed with another company or companies in the most recently completed segment of this proceeding where the Department considered collapsing that entity, complete quantity and value data for that collapsed entity must be submitted. Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a party that has requested a review may withdraw that request within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. The regulation provides that the Department may extend this time if it is reasonable to do so. In order to provide parties additional certainty with respect to when the Department will exercise its discretion to extend this 90-day deadline, interested parties are advised that, with regard to reviews requested on the basis of anniversary months on or after May 2014, the Department does not intend to extend the 90-day deadline unless the requestor demonstrates that an extraordinary 24671 circumstance has prevented it from submitting a timely withdrawal request. Determinations by the Department to extend the 90-day deadline will be made on a case-by-case basis. The Department is providing this notice on its Web site, as well as in its ‘‘Opportunity to Request Administrative Review’’ notices, so that interested parties will be aware of the manner in which the Department intends to exercise its discretion in the future. OPPORTUNITY TO REQUEST A REVIEW: Not later than the last day of May 2014,1 interested parties may request administrative review of the following orders, findings, or suspended investigations, with anniversary dates in May for the following periods: Period of review Antidumping Duty Proceedings Belgium: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils, A–423–808 ..................................................................................................................... Brazil: Iron Construction Castings, A–351–503 ............................................................................................................................ Canada: Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts, A–122–853 .......................................................................................................... India: Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes, A–533–502 ............................................................................................ India: Silicomanganese, A–533–823 ............................................................................................................................................. Indonesia: Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags, A–560–822 ............................................................................................................ Japan: Antifriction Bearings, Ball, A–588–804 .............................................................................................................................. Japan: Gray Portland Cement and Cement Clinker, A–588–815 ................................................................................................. Kazakhstan: Silicomanganese, A–834–807 .................................................................................................................................. Republic of Korea: Polyester Staple Fiber, A–580–839 ............................................................................................................... Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags, A–552–806 ............................................................................ South Africa: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils, A–791–805 .............................................................................................................. Taiwan: Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipe and Tubes, A–583–008 ............................................................................. Taiwan: Polyester Staple Fiber, A–583–833 ................................................................................................................................. Taiwan: Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags, A–583–843 ................................................................................................................ Taiwan: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils, A–583–830 ...................................................................................................................... Taiwan: Stilbenic Optical Brightening Agents, A–583–848 ........................................................................................................... The People’s Republic of China: Aluminum Extrusions, A–570–967 ........................................................................................... The People’s Republic of China: Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe, A–570–935 ................................................ The People’s Republic of China: Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts, A–570–937 .................................................................... The People’s Republic of China: Iron Construction Castings, A–570–502 .................................................................................. The People’s Republic of China: Oil Country Tubular Goods, A–570–943 .................................................................................. The People’s Republic of China: Pure Magnesium, A–570–832 .................................................................................................. The People’s Republic of China: Stilbenic Optical Brightening Agents, A–570–972 ................................................................... Turkey: Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes, A–489–501 ........................................................................................ Turkey: Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube, A–489–815 .................................................................................................... United Arab Emirates: Certain Steel Nails, A–520–804 ............................................................................................................... United Kingdom: Antifriction Bearings, Ball, A–412–801 .............................................................................................................. Venezuela: Silicomanganese, A–307–820 .................................................................................................................................... Countervailing Duty Proceedings Brazil: Iron Construction Castings, C–351–504 ............................................................................................................................ Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags, C–552–805 ............................................................................ South Africa: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils, C–791–806 .............................................................................................................. The People’s Republic of China: Aluminum Extrusions, C–570–968 ........................................................................................... The People’s Republic of China: Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts, C–570–938 ................................................................... The People’s Republic of China: Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks,2 C–570–984 .............................................................................. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Suspension Agreements 1 Or the next business day, if the deadline falls on a weekend, federal holiday or any other day when the Department is closed. 17:30 Apr 30, 2014 Jkt 232001 1/1/13–12/31/13 1/1/13–12/31/13 1/1/13–12/31/13 1/1/13–12/31/13 1/1/13–12/31/13 8/6/12–12/31/13 defined by section 771(9) of the Act may request in writing that the Secretary conduct an administrative review. For both antidumping and countervailing None. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), an interested party as VerDate Mar<15>2010 5/1/13–4/30/14 5/1/13–4/30/14 5/1/13–4/30/14 5/1/13–4/30/14 5/1/13–4/30/14 5/1/13–4/30/14 5/1/11–9/14/11 5/1/13–4/30/14 5/1/13–4/30/14 5/1/13–4/30/14 5/1/13–4/30/14 5/1/13–4/30/14 5/1/13–4/30/14 5/1/13–4/30/14 5/1/13–4/30/14 5/1/13–4/30/14 5/1/13–4/30/14 5/1/13–4/30/14 5/1/13–4/30/14 5/1/13–4/30/14 5/1/13–4/30/14 5/1/13–4/30/14 5/1/13–4/30/14 5/1/13–4/30/14 5/1/13–4/30/14 5/1/13–4/30/14 5/1/13–4/30/14 5/1/11–9/14/11 5/1/13–4/30/14 duty reviews, the interested party must specify the individual producers or exporters covered by an antidumping finding or an antidumping or 2 In the notice of opportunity to request administrative review that published on April 1, 2014 (79 FR 18260) the POR for the above referenced case was incorrect. The period listed above is the correct POR for this case. PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01MYN1.SGM 01MYN1 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 24672 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 84 / Thursday, May 1, 2014 / Notices countervailing duty order or suspension agreement for which it is requesting a review. In addition, a domestic interested party or an interested party described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act must state why it desires the Secretary to review those particular producers or exporters. If the interested party intends for the Secretary to review sales of merchandise by an exporter (or a producer if that producer also exports merchandise from other suppliers) which were produced in more than one country of origin and each country of origin is subject to a separate order, then the interested party must state specifically, on an order-by-order basis, which exporter(s) the request is intended to cover. Please note that, for any party the Department was unable to locate in prior segments, the Department will not accept a request for an administrative review of that party absent new information as to the party’s location. Moreover, if the interested party who files a request for review is unable to locate the producer or exporter for which it requested the review, the interested party must provide an explanation of the attempts it made to locate the producer or exporter at the same time it files its request for review, in order for the Secretary to determine if the interested party’s attempts were reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.303(f)(3)(ii). As explained in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) the Department has clarified its practice with respect to the collection of final antidumping duties on imports of merchandise where intermediate firms are involved. The public should be aware of this clarification in determining whether to request an administrative review of merchandise subject to antidumping findings and orders.3 Further, as explained in Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013), the Department has clarified its practice with regard to the conditional review of the non-market economy (NME) entity in administrative reviews of 3 See also the Enforcement and Compliance Web site at https://trade.gov/enforcement/. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:30 Apr 30, 2014 Jkt 232001 antidumping duty orders. The Department will no longer consider the NME entity as an exporter conditionally subject to administrative reviews. Accordingly, the NME entity will not be under review unless the Department specifically receives a request for, or self-initiates, a review of the NME entity.4 In administrative reviews of antidumping duty orders on merchandise from NME countries where a review of the NME entity has not been initiated, but where an individual exporter for which a review was initiated does not qualify for a separate rate, the Department will issue a final decision indicating that the company in question is part of the NME entity. However, in that situation, because no review of the NME entity was conducted, the NME entity’s entries were not subject to the review and the rate for the NME entity is not subject to change as a result of that review (although the rate for the individual exporter may change as a function of the finding that the exporter is part of the NME entity). Following initiation of an antidumping administrative review when there is no review requested of the NME entity, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate entries for all exporters not named in the initiation notice, including those that were suspended at the NME entity rate. All requests must be filed electronically in Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’) on the IA ACCESS Web site at https://iaaccess.trade.gov.5 Further, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i), a copy of each request must be served on the petitioner and each exporter or producer specified in the request. The Department will publish in the Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation of Administrative Review of Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation’’ for requests received by the last day of May 2014. If the Department does not receive, by the last day of May 2014, a request for review of entries covered by an order, finding, or suspended investigation listed in this notice and for the period identified above, the Department will instruct CBP 4 In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties should specify that they are requesting a review of entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to the extent possible, include the names of such exporters in their request. 5 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011). PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 to assess antidumping or countervailing duties on those entries at a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or bond for) estimated antidumping or countervailing duties required on those entries at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption and to continue to collect the cash deposit previously ordered. For the first administrative review of any order, there will be no assessment of antidumping or countervailing duties on entries of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the relevant provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period of the order, if such a gap period is applicable to the period of review. This notice is not required by statute but is published as a service to the international trading community. Dated: April 25, 2014. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2014–10021 Filed 4–30–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Advance Notification of Sunset Reviews Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. AGENCY: Background Every five years, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) and the International Trade Commission automatically initiate and conduct a review to determine whether revocation of a countervailing or antidumping duty order or termination of an investigation suspended under section 704 or 734 of the Act would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping or a countervailable subsidy (as the case may be) and of material injury. Upcoming Sunset Reviews for June 2014 The following Sunset Review is scheduled for initiation in June 2014 and will appear in that month’s Notice of Initiation of Five-Year Sunset Review (‘‘Sunset Review’’). Antidumping Duty Proceedings Frozen Fish Fillets from Vietnam (A– 552–801) (2nd Review). E:\FR\FM\01MYN1.SGM 01MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 84 (Thursday, May 1, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24670-24672]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10021]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended 
Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD 
Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: 
(202) 482-4735.

Background

    Each year during the anniversary month of the publication of an 
antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended 
investigation, an interested party, as defined in section 771(9) of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''), may request, in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.213, that the Department of Commerce (``the 
Department'') conduct an administrative review of that antidumping or 
countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation.
    All deadlines for the submission of comments or actions by the 
Department discussed below refer to the number of calendar days from 
the applicable starting date.

Respondent Selection

    In the event the Department limits the number of respondents for 
individual examination for administrative reviews initiated pursuant to 
requests made for the orders identified below, the Department intends 
to select respondents based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection 
(``CBP'') data for U.S. imports during the period of review. We intend 
to release the CBP data under Administrative Protective Order (``APO'') 
to all parties having an APO within five days of publication of the 
initiation notice and to make our decision regarding respondent 
selection within 21 days of publication of the initiation Federal 
Register notice. Therefore, we encourage all parties interested in 
commenting on respondent selection to submit their APO applications on 
the date of publication of the initiation notice, or as soon thereafter 
as possible. The Department invites comments regarding the CBP data and 
respondent selection within five days of placement of the CBP data on 
the record of the review.
    In the event the Department decides it is necessary to limit 
individual examination of respondents and conduct respondent selection 
under section 777A(c)(2) of the Act:
    In general, the Department has found that determinations concerning 
whether particular companies should be ``collapsed'' (i.e., treated as 
a single entity for purposes of calculating antidumping duty rates) 
require a substantial amount of detailed information and analysis, 
which often require follow-up questions and analysis. Accordingly, the 
Department will not conduct collapsing analyses at the respondent 
selection phase of this review and will not collapse companies at the 
respondent selection phase unless there has been a determination to 
collapse certain companies in a previous segment of this antidumping 
proceeding (i.e., investigation, administrative review, new shipper 
review or changed circumstances review). For any company subject to 
this review, if the Department determined, or continued to treat, that 
company as collapsed with others, the Department will assume that such 
companies continue to operate in the same manner and will collapse them 
for respondent selection purposes. Otherwise, the Department will not 
collapse companies for purposes of respondent selection.

[[Page 24671]]

Parties are requested to (a) identify which companies subject to review 
previously were collapsed, and (b) provide a citation to the proceeding 
in which they were collapsed. Further, if companies are requested to 
complete the Quantity and Value Questionnaire for purposes of 
respondent selection, in general each company must report volume and 
value data separately for itself. Parties should not include data for 
any other party, even if they believe they should be treated as a 
single entity with that other party. If a company was collapsed with 
another company or companies in the most recently completed segment of 
this proceeding where the Department considered collapsing that entity, 
complete quantity and value data for that collapsed entity must be 
submitted.

Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a party that has requested a 
review may withdraw that request within 90 days of the date of 
publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. The 
regulation provides that the Department may extend this time if it is 
reasonable to do so. In order to provide parties additional certainty 
with respect to when the Department will exercise its discretion to 
extend this 90-day deadline, interested parties are advised that, with 
regard to reviews requested on the basis of anniversary months on or 
after May 2014, the Department does not intend to extend the 90-day 
deadline unless the requestor demonstrates that an extraordinary 
circumstance has prevented it from submitting a timely withdrawal 
request. Determinations by the Department to extend the 90-day deadline 
will be made on a case-by-case basis.
    The Department is providing this notice on its Web site, as well as 
in its ``Opportunity to Request Administrative Review'' notices, so 
that interested parties will be aware of the manner in which the 
Department intends to exercise its discretion in the future.
    OPPORTUNITY TO REQUEST A REVIEW: Not later than the last day of May 
2014,\1\ interested parties may request administrative review of the 
following orders, findings, or suspended investigations, with 
anniversary dates in May for the following periods:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Or the next business day, if the deadline falls on a 
weekend, federal holiday or any other day when the Department is 
closed.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        Period of review
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Antidumping Duty Proceedings
 
Belgium: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils, A-423-808...     5/1/13-4/30/14
Brazil: Iron Construction Castings, A-351-503........     5/1/13-4/30/14
Canada: Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts, A-122-     5/1/13-4/30/14
 853.................................................
India: Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes,      5/1/13-4/30/14
 A-533-502...........................................
India: Silicomanganese, A-533-823....................     5/1/13-4/30/14
Indonesia: Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags, A-560-       5/1/13-4/30/14
 822.................................................
Japan: Antifriction Bearings, Ball, A-588-804........     5/1/11-9/14/11
Japan: Gray Portland Cement and Cement Clinker, A-588-    5/1/13-4/30/14
 815.................................................
Kazakhstan: Silicomanganese, A-834-807...............     5/1/13-4/30/14
Republic of Korea: Polyester Staple Fiber, A-580-839.     5/1/13-4/30/14
Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Polyethylene Retail        5/1/13-4/30/14
 Carrier Bags, A-552-806.............................
South Africa: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils, A-791-      5/1/13-4/30/14
 805.................................................
Taiwan: Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipe and     5/1/13-4/30/14
 Tubes, A-583-008....................................
Taiwan: Polyester Staple Fiber, A-583-833............     5/1/13-4/30/14
Taiwan: Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags, A-583-843..     5/1/13-4/30/14
Taiwan: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils, A-583-830....     5/1/13-4/30/14
Taiwan: Stilbenic Optical Brightening Agents, A-583-      5/1/13-4/30/14
 848.................................................
The People's Republic of China: Aluminum Extrusions,      5/1/13-4/30/14
 A-570-967...........................................
The People's Republic of China: Circular Welded           5/1/13-4/30/14
 Carbon Quality Steel Line Pipe, A-570-935...........
The People's Republic of China: Citric Acid and           5/1/13-4/30/14
 Certain Citrate Salts, A-570-937....................
The People's Republic of China: Iron Construction         5/1/13-4/30/14
 Castings, A-570-502.................................
The People's Republic of China: Oil Country Tubular       5/1/13-4/30/14
 Goods, A-570-943....................................
The People's Republic of China: Pure Magnesium, A-570-    5/1/13-4/30/14
 832.................................................
The People's Republic of China: Stilbenic Optical         5/1/13-4/30/14
 Brightening Agents, A-570-972.......................
Turkey: Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes,     5/1/13-4/30/14
 A-489-501...........................................
Turkey: Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube, A-489-    5/1/13-4/30/14
 815.................................................
United Arab Emirates: Certain Steel Nails, A-520-804.     5/1/13-4/30/14
United Kingdom: Antifriction Bearings, Ball, A-412-       5/1/11-9/14/11
 801.................................................
Venezuela: Silicomanganese, A-307-820................     5/1/13-4/30/14
 
           Countervailing Duty Proceedings
 
Brazil: Iron Construction Castings, C-351-504........    1/1/13-12/31/13
Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Polyethylene Retail       1/1/13-12/31/13
 Carrier Bags, C-552-805.............................
South Africa: Stainless Steel Plate in Coils, C-791-     1/1/13-12/31/13
 806.................................................
The People's Republic of China: Aluminum Extrusions,     1/1/13-12/31/13
 C-570-968...........................................
The People's Republic of China: Citric Acid and          1/1/13-12/31/13
 Certain Citrate Salts, C-570-938....................
The People's Republic of China: Drawn Stainless Steel    8/6/12-12/31/13
 Sinks,\2\ C-570-984.................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Suspension Agreements

    None.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ In the notice of opportunity to request administrative 
review that published on April 1, 2014 (79 FR 18260) the POR for the 
above referenced case was incorrect. The period listed above is the 
correct POR for this case.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), an interested party as 
defined by section 771(9) of the Act may request in writing that the 
Secretary conduct an administrative review. For both antidumping and 
countervailing duty reviews, the interested party must specify the 
individual producers or exporters covered by an antidumping finding or 
an antidumping or

[[Page 24672]]

countervailing duty order or suspension agreement for which it is 
requesting a review. In addition, a domestic interested party or an 
interested party described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act must state 
why it desires the Secretary to review those particular producers or 
exporters. If the interested party intends for the Secretary to review 
sales of merchandise by an exporter (or a producer if that producer 
also exports merchandise from other suppliers) which were produced in 
more than one country of origin and each country of origin is subject 
to a separate order, then the interested party must state specifically, 
on an order-by-order basis, which exporter(s) the request is intended 
to cover.
    Please note that, for any party the Department was unable to locate 
in prior segments, the Department will not accept a request for an 
administrative review of that party absent new information as to the 
party's location. Moreover, if the interested party who files a request 
for review is unable to locate the producer or exporter for which it 
requested the review, the interested party must provide an explanation 
of the attempts it made to locate the producer or exporter at the same 
time it files its request for review, in order for the Secretary to 
determine if the interested party's attempts were reasonable, pursuant 
to 19 CFR 351.303(f)(3)(ii).
    As explained in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and Non-
Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping 
Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) the Department has clarified its 
practice with respect to the collection of final antidumping duties on 
imports of merchandise where intermediate firms are involved. The 
public should be aware of this clarification in determining whether to 
request an administrative review of merchandise subject to antidumping 
findings and orders.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See also the Enforcement and Compliance Web site at https://trade.gov/enforcement/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, as explained in Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of 
Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping 
Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity 
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013), 
the Department has clarified its practice with regard to the 
conditional review of the non-market economy (NME) entity in 
administrative reviews of antidumping duty orders. The Department will 
no longer consider the NME entity as an exporter conditionally subject 
to administrative reviews. Accordingly, the NME entity will not be 
under review unless the Department specifically receives a request for, 
or self-initiates, a review of the NME entity.\4\ In administrative 
reviews of antidumping duty orders on merchandise from NME countries 
where a review of the NME entity has not been initiated, but where an 
individual exporter for which a review was initiated does not qualify 
for a separate rate, the Department will issue a final decision 
indicating that the company in question is part of the NME entity. 
However, in that situation, because no review of the NME entity was 
conducted, the NME entity's entries were not subject to the review and 
the rate for the NME entity is not subject to change as a result of 
that review (although the rate for the individual exporter may change 
as a function of the finding that the exporter is part of the NME 
entity).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties should 
specify that they are requesting a review of entries from exporters 
comprising the entity, and to the extent possible, include the names 
of such exporters in their request.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Following initiation of an antidumping administrative review when 
there is no review requested of the NME entity, the Department will 
instruct CBP to liquidate entries for all exporters not named in the 
initiation notice, including those that were suspended at the NME 
entity rate.
    All requests must be filed electronically in Enforcement and 
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic 
Service System (``IA ACCESS'') on the IA ACCESS Web site at https://iaaccess.trade.gov.\5\ Further, in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.303(f)(l)(i), a copy of each request must be served on the 
petitioner and each exporter or producer specified in the request.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order 
Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department will publish in the Federal Register a notice of 
``Initiation of Administrative Review of Antidumping or Countervailing 
Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation'' for requests received 
by the last day of May 2014. If the Department does not receive, by the 
last day of May 2014, a request for review of entries covered by an 
order, finding, or suspended investigation listed in this notice and 
for the period identified above, the Department will instruct CBP to 
assess antidumping or countervailing duties on those entries at a rate 
equal to the cash deposit of (or bond for) estimated antidumping or 
countervailing duties required on those entries at the time of entry, 
or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption and to continue to 
collect the cash deposit previously ordered.
    For the first administrative review of any order, there will be no 
assessment of antidumping or countervailing duties on entries of 
subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for 
consumption during the relevant provisional-measures ``gap'' period of 
the order, if such a gap period is applicable to the period of review.
    This notice is not required by statute but is published as a 
service to the international trading community.

    Dated: April 25, 2014.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2014-10021 Filed 4-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.