Von Hoffmann Corporation, a Subsidiary of RR Donnelley & Sons Company, Jefferson City Plant, Including On-Site Leased Workers from Employment Plus and Manpower, Jefferson City, Missouri; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 24014 [2014-09755]

Download as PDF 24014 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 82 / Tuesday, April 29, 2014 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–83,346] Von Hoffmann Corporation, a Subsidiary of RR Donnelley & Sons Company, Jefferson City Plant, Including On-Site Leased Workers from Employment Plus and Manpower, Jefferson City, Missouri; Notice of Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration By application dated March 24, 2014, a worker requested administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding workers’ eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The determination was issued on February 27, 2014. The determination was based on the Department’s findings that there was no increase in imports of textbooks or catalogues, or like or directly competitive articles (including e-books); there was no shift in production by the subject firm to a foreign country, and no acquisition in production by the subject firm from a foreign country; the workers are not secondarily-affected workers; and the subject firm was not named by the International Trade Commission as required by Section 222(e) of the Trade Act, as amended. Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under the following circumstances: (1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered that the determination complained of was erroneous; (2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or (3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the decision. The request for reconsideration identifies a new source of information regarding a shift of production to India and Mexico. The Department has carefully reviewed the request for reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. Conclusion After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. Department of Labor’s prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted. Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of April, 2014. Del Min Amy Chen, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2014–09755 Filed 4–28–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Investigations Regarding Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under Section 221 (a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and are identified in the Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to Section 221 (a) of the Act. The purpose of each of the investigations is to determine whether the workers are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title II, Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations will further relate, as appropriate, to the determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved. The petitioners or any other persons showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigations may request a public hearing provided such request is filed in writing with the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than May 9, 2014. Interested persons are invited to submit written comments regarding the subject matter of the investigations to the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than May 9, 2014. The petitions filed in this case are available for inspection at the Office of the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N–5428, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210. Signed at Washington, DC this 18th day of April 2014. Hope D. Kinglock, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. APPENDIX [14 TAA petitions instituted between 4/7/14 and 4/11/14] TA–W Subject Firm (Petitioners) Location 85209 ................ Associated Spring ................................................................. (State/One-Stop) ................................................................... Voith Hydro Inc. .................................................................... (Union) .................................................................................. OSRAM SYLVANIA .............................................................. (Company) ............................................................................ IMPCO Technologies, Inc. ................................................... (Company) ............................................................................ Hewlett Packard ................................................................... (Company) ............................................................................ ConAgra Foods, Carriage House (incl. Dunkirk, NY Location). (Union) .................................................................................. Fruit of The Loom ................................................................. (Company) ............................................................................ Dennis Uniform Manufacturing Company ............................ (State/One-Stop) ................................................................... Saline, MI .............................. 04/07/14 04/07/14 York, PA ................................ 04/07/14 04/04/14 Central Falls, RI .................... 04/07/14 04/04/14 Sterling Heights, MI .............. 04/08/14 04/07/14 Boise, ID ............................... 04/08/14 03/31/14 Fredonia, NY ......................... 04/08/14 04/03/14 Jamestown, KY ..................... 04/09/14 04/08/14 Portland, OR ......................... 04/09/14 04/08/14 85210 ................ 85211 ................ sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 85212 ................ 85213 ................ 85214 ................ 85215 ................ 85216 ................ VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:56 Apr 28, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00087 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM Date of institution 29APN1 Date of petition

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 82 (Tuesday, April 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 24014]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-09755]



[[Page 24014]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-83,346]


Von Hoffmann Corporation, a Subsidiary of RR Donnelley & Sons 
Company, Jefferson City Plant, Including On-Site Leased Workers from 
Employment Plus and Manpower, Jefferson City, Missouri; Notice of 
Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By application dated March 24, 2014, a worker requested 
administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding 
workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) 
applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The 
determination was issued on February 27, 2014.
    The determination was based on the Department's findings that there 
was no increase in imports of textbooks or catalogues, or like or 
directly competitive articles (including e-books); there was no shift 
in production by the subject firm to a foreign country, and no 
acquisition in production by the subject firm from a foreign country; 
the workers are not secondarily-affected workers; and the subject firm 
was not named by the International Trade Commission as required by 
Section 222(e) of the Trade Act, as amended.
    Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under 
the following circumstances:
    (1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered 
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
    (2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on 
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
    (3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a 
misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of 
the decision.
    The request for reconsideration identifies a new source of 
information regarding a shift of production to India and Mexico.
    The Department has carefully reviewed the request for 
reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the 
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the 
workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. 
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, 
granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of April, 2014.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2014-09755 Filed 4-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.