Wind Clean Corporation; Coleman, Texas; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration, 24013 [2014-09754]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 82 / Tuesday, April 29, 2014 / Notices
Employment and Training
Administration
apply for TAA because Section 222(e) of
the Trade Act, as amended, was met.
The petitioner did not supply facts
not previously considered; nor provide
additional documentation indicating
that there was either (1) a mistake in the
determination of facts not previously
considered or (2) a misinterpretation of
facts or of the law justifying
reconsideration of the initial
determination. Based on these findings,
the Department determines that 29 CFR
90.18(c) has not been met.
[TA–W–83,317]
Conclusion
approval of the ICR; they will also
become a matter of public record.
Eric M. Seleznow,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Employment
and Training, Labor.
[FR Doc. 2014–09749 Filed 4–28–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FW–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Wind Clean Corporation; Coleman,
Texas; Notice of Negative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration
By application dated March 10, 2014,
a Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA)
Coordinator requested administrative
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s negative determination
regarding eligibility to apply for TAA
applicable to workers and former
workers of the subject firm. The
negative determination was issued on
February 24, 2014.
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c)
reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts
not previously considered that the
determination complained of was
erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination
complained of was based on a mistake
in the determination of facts not
previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying
Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of
the law justified reconsideration of the
decision.
The request for reconsideration
asserts that because ‘‘Wind Clean
provides coating services to Trinity
Structural Towers in Coleman, Texas’’
and workers of Trinity Structural
Towers are eligible to apply for TAA,
Section 222(b) of the Trade Act, as
amended, has been met.
Section 222(b) of the Trade Act, 19
U.S.C. § 2272(b), requires that the
workers’ firm be a Supplier or
Downstream Producer (as the case may
be) to a firm that employed a worker
group eligible to apply for TAA under
Section 222(a) of the Trade Act and that
the supply or production (as the case
may be) is related to the article or
service that was the basis for the Section
222(a) certification.
Workers and former workers of
Trinity Structural Towers, Coleman,
Texas (TA–W–83,318) are eligible to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:08 Apr 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
After careful review of the application
and investigative findings, I conclude
that there has been no error or
misinterpretation of the law or of the
facts which would justify
reconsideration of the Department of
Labor’s prior decision. Accordingly, the
application is denied.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 8th day of
April 2014.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2014–09754 Filed 4–28–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–83,194]
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., (MSD), a
Subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., West
Point, Pennsylvania; Notice of
Affirmative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration
By application dated March 10, 2014,
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
requested administrative
reconsideration of the negative
determination regarding workers’
eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment
Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers
and former workers of the subject firm.
The determination was issued on
February 18, 2014 and the Department’s
Notice of determination was published
in the Federal Register on March 14,
2014 (79 FR 14543). Workers at the
subject firm are engaged in activities
related to the production of
pharmaceuticals and vaccines for
human use.
The negative determination was based
on the Department’s findings that the
subject firm did not shift production of
pharmaceuticals and vaccines to a
foreign country (or acquire such
production from a foreign country) and
that imports of articles like or directly
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24013
competitive with the pharmaceuticals
and vaccines produced by the workers
did not increase during the period
under investigation.
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c)
reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts
not previously considered that the
determination complained of was
erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination
complained of was based on a mistake
in the determination of facts not
previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying
Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of
the law justified reconsideration of the
decision.
The request for reconsideration
included information that indicates that
the determination was based on facts
not previously considered. The request
for reconsideration stated that the
worker group at the subject facility
consists of three separately identifiable
worker sub-groups (research and
development, manufacturing, and global
support networks), that the scope of the
initial investigation was ‘‘overly
narrow’’ because workers in the
research and development sub-group
and/or the global support networks subgroup ‘‘may be engaged in activities
totally separate and unrelated from’’
activities of the manufacturing subgroup. The request for reconsideration
included supporting documents.
The Department has carefully
reviewed the request for
reconsideration, including the
attachments, and the existing record,
and has determined that the Department
will conduct further investigation to
determine if the workers meet the
eligibility requirements of the Trade Act
of 1974, as amended.
Conclusion
After careful review of the
application, I conclude that the claim is
of sufficient weight to justify
reconsideration of the U.S. Department
of Labor’s prior decision. The
application is, therefore, granted.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of
April, 2014.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2014–09753 Filed 4–28–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM
29APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 82 (Tuesday, April 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 24013]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-09754]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[TA-W-83,317]
Wind Clean Corporation; Coleman, Texas; Notice of Negative
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration
By application dated March 10, 2014, a Trade Adjustment Assistance
(TAA) Coordinator requested administrative reconsideration of the
Department of Labor's negative determination regarding eligibility to
apply for TAA applicable to workers and former workers of the subject
firm. The negative determination was issued on February 24, 2014.
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a
misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of
the decision.
The request for reconsideration asserts that because ``Wind Clean
provides coating services to Trinity Structural Towers in Coleman,
Texas'' and workers of Trinity Structural Towers are eligible to apply
for TAA, Section 222(b) of the Trade Act, as amended, has been met.
Section 222(b) of the Trade Act, 19 U.S.C. Sec. 2272(b), requires
that the workers' firm be a Supplier or Downstream Producer (as the
case may be) to a firm that employed a worker group eligible to apply
for TAA under Section 222(a) of the Trade Act and that the supply or
production (as the case may be) is related to the article or service
that was the basis for the Section 222(a) certification.
Workers and former workers of Trinity Structural Towers, Coleman,
Texas (TA-W-83,318) are eligible to apply for TAA because Section
222(e) of the Trade Act, as amended, was met.
The petitioner did not supply facts not previously considered; nor
provide additional documentation indicating that there was either (1) a
mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered or (2)
a misinterpretation of facts or of the law justifying reconsideration
of the initial determination. Based on these findings, the Department
determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not been met.
Conclusion
After careful review of the application and investigative findings,
I conclude that there has been no error or misinterpretation of the law
or of the facts which would justify reconsideration of the Department
of Labor's prior decision. Accordingly, the application is denied.
Signed in Washington, DC, this 8th day of April 2014.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2014-09754 Filed 4-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
