Max Planck Florida Institute, et al.; Notice of Consolidated Decision on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscope, 23326-23327 [2014-09606]
Download as PDF
23326
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 81 / Monday, April 28, 2014 / Notices
rates based on the ratio of the total
amount of dumping calculated for the
importer’s examined sales and the total
entered value of those sales. We will
instruct CBP to assess antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries covered
by this review when the importerspecific assessment rate is not zero or de
minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent).
Where an importer-specific assessment
rate is zero or de minimis, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate
entries without regard to antidumping
duties.
For Hailiang, the Department will
instruct CBP to liquidate all appropriate
entries at an ad valorem rate equal to
Hailiang’s weighted-average dumping
margin in the final results of this
administrative review.
The Department announced a
refinement to its assessment practice in
non-market economy (‘‘NME’’) cases.
Pursuant to this refinement in practice,
for entries that were not reported in the
U.S. sales databases submitted by
companies individually examined
during this review, the Department will
instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at
the rate for the NME-wide entity. In
addition, if the Department determines
that an exporter under review had no
shipments of the subject merchandise,
any suspended entries that entered
under that exporter’s case number (i.e.,
at that exporter’s rate) will be liquidated
at the rate for the NME-wide entity.10
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
administrative review for shipments of
the subject merchandise from the PRC
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date, as provided by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (‘‘the Act’’): (1) For the
exporters identified above, the cash
deposit rate will be equal to their
weighted-average dumping margin in
these final results of review; (2) for
previously investigated or reviewed PRC
and non-PRC exporters that received a
separate rate in a previously completed
segment of this proceeding, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be the
existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all
PRC exporters of subject merchandise
that have not been found to be entitled
a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will
be that for the PRC-wide entity (i.e.,
60.85 percent); and (4) for all non-PRC
10 For a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694
(October 24, 2011).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:06 Apr 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
exporters of subject merchandise which
have not received their own rate, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate
applicable to the PRC exporter that
supplied that non-PRC exporter. These
deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Disclosure
We will disclose the calculations
performed regarding these final results
within five days of the date of
publication of this notice in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Comment 3: Surrogate Values for Ocean
Freight
Comment 4: Consideration of an
Alternative Comparison Method in
Administrative Reviews
Comment 5: Differential Pricing Analysis:
A Pattern of Prices That Differ
Significantly Based on Period of Time
Comment 6: Differential Pricing Analysis:
Alternative Definition of Time Periods
for the Cohen’s d Test
Comment 7: Surrogate Country Selection
Comment 8: Financial Ratios
Comment 9: Surrogate Value for Labor
Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2014–09608 Filed 4–25–14; 8:45 am]
Notification to Importers Regarding the
Reimbursement of Duties
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)
to file a certificate regarding the
reimbursement of antidumping duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant
entries during this POR. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Department’s presumption
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties has occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping
duties.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Notifications to All Parties
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to Administrative
Protective Order (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary
information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification
of the return or destruction of APO
materials, or conversion to judicial
protective order, is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing this
administrative review and notice in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i) of the Act.
Dated: April 21, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix—Issues and Decision
Memorandum
Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
Determination of the Comparison Method
Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Hailiang Cash Deposit and
Liquidation Instructions
Comment 2: Golden Dragon’s By-Product
Offset
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
International Trade Administration
Max Planck Florida Institute, et al.;
Notice of Consolidated Decision on
Applications for Duty-Free Entry of
Electron Microscope
This is a decision consolidated
pursuant to Section 6(c) of the
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural
Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub.
L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106–
36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301).
Related records can be viewed between
8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in Room 3720,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC
Docket Number: 13–031. Applicant:
Max Planck Florida Institute, Jupiter, FL
33458. Instrument: Field Emission GunScanning Electron Microscope.
Manufacturer: Carl Zeiss Microscopy,
Germany. Intended Use: See notice at 79
FR 3178, January 17, 2014.
Docket Number: 13–042. Applicant:
University of Washington Medical
Center, Seattle, WA 98195–6100.
Instrument: Transmission Electron
Microscope-system type: Tecnai G2
Spirit BioTWIN. Manufacturer: FEI
Company, Czech Republic. Intended
Use: See notice at 79 FR 3178, January
17, 2014.
Docket Number: 13–044. Applicant:
University of Minnesota-Twin Cities,
Minneapolis, MN 55455. Instrument:
Ultrafast Transmission Electron
Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI
Company, the Netherlands. Intended
Use: See notice at 79 FR 3178–79,
January 17, 2014.
Docket Number: 13–045. Applicant:
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
Daytona Beach, FL 32114. Instrument:
Scanning Electron Microscope Quanta
50 with Energy-Dispersive X-Ray
Spectroscopy. Manufacturer: FEI
Company, Czech Republic. Intended
E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM
28APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 81 / Monday, April 28, 2014 / Notices
Use: See notice at 79 FR 3178–79,
January 17, 2014.
Docket Number: 13–046. Applicant:
UT-Battelle, LLC for the Department of
Energy, Oak Ridge, TN 37831–6138.
Instrument: JEM–2100F Field Emission
Transmission Electron Microscope.
Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., Japan.
Intended Use: See notice at 79 FR 3178–
79, January 17, 2014.
Docket Number: 13–047. Applicant:
The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla,
CA 92037. Instrument: Transmission
Electron Microscope-Talos.
Manufacturer: FEI Company, the
Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at
79 FR 3178–79, January 17, 2014.
Docket Number: 13–049. Applicant:
The Regents of the University of
Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Instrument: Titan Krios Transmission
Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI
Company, the Netherlands. Intended
Use: See notice at 79 FR 3178–79,
January 17, 2014.
Comments: None received. Decision:
Approved. No instrument of equivalent
scientific value to the foreign
instrument, for such purposes as this
instrument is intended to be used, is
being manufactured in the United States
at the time the instrument was ordered.
Reasons: Each foreign instrument is an
electron microscope and is intended for
research or scientific educational uses
requiring an electron microscope. We
know of no electron microscope, or any
other instrument suited to these
purposes, which was being
manufactured in the United States at the
time of order of each instrument.
Dated: April 21, 2014.
Gregory W. Campbell,
Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office,
Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014–09606 Filed 4–25–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Advisory Committee on Supply Chain
Competitiveness: Notice of Public
Meeting
International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice of open meeting.
This notice sets forth the
schedule and proposed topics of
discussion for a public meeting of the
Advisory Committee on Supply Chain
Competitiveness (Committee).
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:06 Apr 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
The meeting will be held on June
10, 2014, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m., Eastern
Standard Time (EST).
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Room 4830,
Washington, DC 20230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Boll, Office of Supply Chain,
Professional & Business Services,
International Trade Administration.
(Phone: (202) 482–1135 or Email:
richard.boll@trade.gov)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: The Committee was
established under the discretionary
authority of the Secretary of Commerce
and in accordance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.
2). It provides advice to the Secretary of
Commerce on the necessary elements of
a comprehensive policy approach to
supply chain competitiveness designed
to support U.S. export growth and
national economic competitiveness,
encourage innovation, facilitate the
movement of goods, and improve the
competitiveness of U.S. supply chains
for goods and services in the domestic
and global economy; and provides
advice to the Secretary on regulatory
policies and programs and investment
priorities that affect the competitiveness
of U.S. supply chains. For more
information about the Committee visit:
https://ita.doc.gov/td/sif/DSCT/ACSCC/.
Matters To Be Considered: Committee
members are expected to continue to
discuss the major competitivenessrelated topics raised at the previous
Committee meetings, including trade
and competitiveness; freight movement
and policy; information technology and
data requirements; regulatory issues;
and finance and infrastructure. The
Committee’s subcommittees will report
on the status of their work regarding
these topics. The agenda may change to
accommodate Committee business. The
Office of Supply Chain, Professional &
Business Services will post the final
detailed agenda on its Web site, https://
ita.doc.gov/td/sif/DSCT/ACSCC/, at
least one week prior to the meeting.
The meeting will be open to the
public and press on a first-come, firstserved basis. Space is limited. The
public meeting is physically accessible
to people with disabilities. Individuals
requiring accommodations, such as sign
language interpretation or other
ancillary aids, are asked to notify Mr.
Richard Boll, at (202) 482–1135 or
richard.boll@trade.gov five (5) business
days before the meeting.
Interested parties are invited to
submit written comments to the
Committee at any time before and after
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
23327
the meeting. Parties wishing to submit
written comments for consideration by
the Committee in advance of this
meeting must send them to the Office of
Supply Chain, Professional & Business
Services, 1401 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Room 11014, Washington, DC 20230, or
email to supplychain@trade.gov.
For consideration during the meeting,
and to ensure transmission to the
Committee prior to the meeting,
comments must be received no later
than 5 p.m. EST on June 3, 2014.
Comments received after June 3, 2014,
will be distributed to the Committee,
but may not be considered at the
meeting. The minutes of the meeting
will be posted on the Committee Web
site within 60 days of the meeting.
Dated: April 17, 2014.
David Long,
Director, Office of Supply Chain, Professional
& Business Services.
[FR Doc. 2014–09503 Filed 4–25–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XD240
Fisheries of the South Atlantic and the
Gulf of Mexico; Southeast Data,
Assessment and Review (SEDAR);
Public Meeting
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of SEDAR 39 Data
Workshop for HMS Smoothhound
Sharks.
AGENCY:
The SEDAR 39 assessment of
the HMS Smoothhound Sharks: A Data
Workshop; a series of Assessment
webinars; and a Review Workshop. See
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
DATES: The SEDAR 39 Data Workshop
will be held from 1 p.m. on May 19,
2014 until 12 p.m. on May 23, 2014; the
Assessment webinars and Review
Workshop dates and times will publish
in a subsequent issue in the Federal
Register.
ADDRESSES: Meeting address: The
SEDAR 39 Data Workshop will be held
at the Hilton Garden Inn, 5265
International Boulevard, North
Charleston, SC 29418; 843–308–9330.
SEDAR address: 4055 Faber Place
Drive, Suite 201, N. Charleston, SC
29405.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie
Neer, SEDAR Coordinator; telephone:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM
28APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 81 (Monday, April 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23326-23327]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-09606]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Max Planck Florida Institute, et al.; Notice of Consolidated
Decision on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscope
This is a decision consolidated pursuant to Section 6(c) of the
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966
(Pub. L. 89-651, as amended by Pub. L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR
part 301). Related records can be viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00
p.m. in Room 3720, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC
Docket Number: 13-031. Applicant: Max Planck Florida Institute,
Jupiter, FL 33458. Instrument: Field Emission Gun-Scanning Electron
Microscope. Manufacturer: Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Germany. Intended Use:
See notice at 79 FR 3178, January 17, 2014.
Docket Number: 13-042. Applicant: University of Washington Medical
Center, Seattle, WA 98195-6100. Instrument: Transmission Electron
Microscope-system type: Tecnai G2 Spirit BioTWIN. Manufacturer: FEI
Company, Czech Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 79 FR 3178,
January 17, 2014.
Docket Number: 13-044. Applicant: University of Minnesota-Twin
Cities, Minneapolis, MN 55455. Instrument: Ultrafast Transmission
Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, the Netherlands.
Intended Use: See notice at 79 FR 3178-79, January 17, 2014.
Docket Number: 13-045. Applicant: Embry-Riddle Aeronautical
University, Daytona Beach, FL 32114. Instrument: Scanning Electron
Microscope Quanta 50 with Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy.
Manufacturer: FEI Company, Czech Republic. Intended
[[Page 23327]]
Use: See notice at 79 FR 3178-79, January 17, 2014.
Docket Number: 13-046. Applicant: UT-Battelle, LLC for the
Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6138. Instrument: JEM-2100F
Field Emission Transmission Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: JEOL
Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 79 FR 3178-79, January 17,
2014.
Docket Number: 13-047. Applicant: The Scripps Research Institute,
La Jolla, CA 92037. Instrument: Transmission Electron Microscope-Talos.
Manufacturer: FEI Company, the Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at
79 FR 3178-79, January 17, 2014.
Docket Number: 13-049. Applicant: The Regents of the University of
Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. Instrument: Titan Krios Transmission
Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, the Netherlands.
Intended Use: See notice at 79 FR 3178-79, January 17, 2014.
Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such
purposes as this instrument is intended to be used, is being
manufactured in the United States at the time the instrument was
ordered. Reasons: Each foreign instrument is an electron microscope and
is intended for research or scientific educational uses requiring an
electron microscope. We know of no electron microscope, or any other
instrument suited to these purposes, which was being manufactured in
the United States at the time of order of each instrument.
Dated: April 21, 2014.
Gregory W. Campbell,
Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office, Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014-09606 Filed 4-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P