Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 23388 [2014-09529]
Download as PDF
23388
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 81 / Monday, April 28, 2014 / Notices
Schedule SB (Single Employer Defined
Benefit Plan Actuarial Information) and
related instructions.
The modification to the Schedule MB
requires plan administrators of
multiemployer defined benefit plans in
critical status to provide information
about the plan year in which the plan
is projected to emerge from critical
status and, if the rehabilitation plan is
based on forestalling possible
insolvency, the plan year in which
insolvency is expected. The
modification to the Schedule SB
requires plan adminstrators of singleemployer defined benefit plans to report
the funding target (vested and total) for
each type of participant (active, retired,
terminated vested).
On February 21, 2014 (79 FR 9927),
PBGC published a notice informing the
public that it intended to request OMB
approval of the modifications and
soliciting public comment. PBGC
received one comment, which is posted
on PBGC’s Web site at https://
www.pbgc.gov/prac/pg/other/guidance/
paperwork-notices.html.
The collection of information has
been approved by OMB under control
number 1212–0057 through April 30,
2014. PBGC is requesting that OMB
extend its approval for another three
years, with modifications. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
PBGC estimates that it will receive
approximately 25,000 Form 5500 and
Form 5500–SF filings per year under
this collection of information. PBGC
further estimates that the total annual
burden of this collection of information
will be 1,200 hours and $1.36 million.
Issued in Washington, DC, this 23rd day of
April, 2014.
Judith Starr,
General Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2014–09587 Filed 4–25–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7709–02–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor
Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549–0213.
Extension:
Rule 17g–7, SEC File No. 270–600, OMB
Control No. 3235–0656.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:06 Apr 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(‘‘PRA’’) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(‘‘OMB’’) a request for approval of
extension of the previously approved
collection of information provided for in
Rule 17g–7, (17 CFR 240.17g–7), under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Exchange Act’’) (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.).
Rule 17g–7 requires nationally
recognized statistical rating
organizations (‘‘NRSROs’’) to include in
any report accompanying a credit rating
with respect to an asset-backed security
(‘‘ABS’’) (as that term is defined in
Section 3(a)(77) of the Exchange Act) a
description of the representations,
warranties and enforcement
mechanisms available to investors and a
description of how they differ from the
representations, warranties and
enforcement mechanisms in issuances
of similar securities. Rule 17g–7
potentially applies to each of the 10
NRSROs currently registered with the
Commission.1
Commission staff estimates that the 10
currently-registered NRSROs would
each spend an average of approximately
100 hours per year reviewing and
updating benchmarks for various types
of securities for purposes of comparing
representations, warranties, and
enforcement mechanisms, resulting in
an annual industry-wide reporting
burden of 1,000 hours (10 respondents
× 100 hours/respondent). On a deal-bydeal basis, Commission staff estimates
that it would take each NRSRO an
average of approximately: (i) One hour
1 When the Commission first adopted rules under
the Credit Rating Agency Reform Act of 2006, it
estimated that approximately 30 credit rating
agencies ultimately would be registered as NRSROs.
See Oversight of Credit Rating Agencies Registered
as Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating
Organizations, Release No. 34–55857 (Jun. 5, 2007),
72 FR 33564, 33607 (Jun. 18, 2007). Accordingly,
the Commission used 30 respondents for purposes
of calculating its PRA burden estimates when it
adopted Rule 17g–7. See Disclosure for AssetBacked Securities Required by Section 943 of the
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act, Release No. 33–9175; 34–63741 (Jan.
20, 2011), 76 FR 4489, 4506 (Jan. 26, 2011) (‘‘Rule
17g–7 Adopting Release’’). Since that time, 10
credit rating agencies have registered with the
Commission as NRSROs. This number has
remained constant for several years. Consequently,
when the Commission last proposed rules regarding
the oversight of NRSROs, it stated that it believed
it to be more appropriate to use the actual number
of NRSROs for purposes of the PRA. See Proposed
Rules for Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating
Organizations, Release No. 34–64514 (May 18,
2011), 76 FR 33420, 33499 (Jun. 8, 2011) (stating
that ‘‘while the Commission expects several more
credit rating agencies may become registered as
NRSROs over the next few years, the Commission
preliminarily believes that the actual number of
NRSROs should be used for purposes of the PRA.’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
to review each ABS transaction to
review the relevant disclosures prepared
by an issuer, which an NRSRO would
review as part of the rating process, and
convert those disclosures into a format
suitable for inclusion in any report to be
issued by an NRSRO, and (ii) 10 hours
per ABS transaction to compare the
terms of the current deal to those of
similar securities. When the
Commission adopted Rule 17g–7, it
estimated the average annual number of
ABS offerings to be 2,067 and the
average number of credit ratings per
issuance of ABS to be four, resulting in
8,268 annual responses.2 Commission
staff believes that these estimates
continue to be valid and, accordingly,
estimates that the total industry-wide
annual reporting burden of complying
with the disclosure requirements under
Rule 17g–7 is 90,948 hours (8,268
responses × 11 hours/response). As a
result, Commission staff estimates a
total aggregate burden of 91,948 hours
per year for complying with the rule
(1,000 hours for reviewing and updating
benchmarks + 90,948 hours for
complying with disclosure
requirements).
Compliance with Rule 17g–7 is
mandatory. Responses to the
information collection will not be kept
confidential and there is no mandatory
retention period for the collection of
information.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
under the PRA unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
The public may view background
documentation for this information
collection at the following Web site:
www.reginfo.gov. Comments should be
directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the
Securities and Exchange Commission,
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Room 10102, New Executive
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503,
or by sending an email to: Shagufta_
Ahmed@omb.eop.gov; and (ii) Thomas
Bayer, Director/Chief Information
Officer, Securities and Exchange
Commission, c/o Remi Pavlik-Simon,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549, or by sending an email to: PRA_
Mailbox@sec.gov. Comments must be
submitted to OMB within 30 days of
this notice.
Dated: April 22, 2014.
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–09529 Filed 4–25–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
2 See
E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM
Rule 17g–7 Adopting Release, 76 FR at 4508.
28APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 81 (Monday, April 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 23388]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-09529]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC
20549-0213.
Extension:
Rule 17g-7, SEC File No. 270-600, OMB Control No. 3235-0656.
Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (``PRA'') (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (``OMB'') a request for approval of extension of the
previously approved collection of information provided for in Rule 17g-
7, (17 CFR 240.17g-7), under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Exchange Act'') (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.).
Rule 17g-7 requires nationally recognized statistical rating
organizations (``NRSROs'') to include in any report accompanying a
credit rating with respect to an asset-backed security (``ABS'') (as
that term is defined in Section 3(a)(77) of the Exchange Act) a
description of the representations, warranties and enforcement
mechanisms available to investors and a description of how they differ
from the representations, warranties and enforcement mechanisms in
issuances of similar securities. Rule 17g-7 potentially applies to each
of the 10 NRSROs currently registered with the Commission.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ When the Commission first adopted rules under the Credit
Rating Agency Reform Act of 2006, it estimated that approximately 30
credit rating agencies ultimately would be registered as NRSROs. See
Oversight of Credit Rating Agencies Registered as Nationally
Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations, Release No. 34-55857
(Jun. 5, 2007), 72 FR 33564, 33607 (Jun. 18, 2007). Accordingly, the
Commission used 30 respondents for purposes of calculating its PRA
burden estimates when it adopted Rule 17g-7. See Disclosure for
Asset-Backed Securities Required by Section 943 of the Dodd-Frank
Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Release No. 33-9175;
34-63741 (Jan. 20, 2011), 76 FR 4489, 4506 (Jan. 26, 2011) (``Rule
17g-7 Adopting Release''). Since that time, 10 credit rating
agencies have registered with the Commission as NRSROs. This number
has remained constant for several years. Consequently, when the
Commission last proposed rules regarding the oversight of NRSROs, it
stated that it believed it to be more appropriate to use the actual
number of NRSROs for purposes of the PRA. See Proposed Rules for
Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations, Release No.
34-64514 (May 18, 2011), 76 FR 33420, 33499 (Jun. 8, 2011) (stating
that ``while the Commission expects several more credit rating
agencies may become registered as NRSROs over the next few years,
the Commission preliminarily believes that the actual number of
NRSROs should be used for purposes of the PRA.'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commission staff estimates that the 10 currently-registered NRSROs
would each spend an average of approximately 100 hours per year
reviewing and updating benchmarks for various types of securities for
purposes of comparing representations, warranties, and enforcement
mechanisms, resulting in an annual industry-wide reporting burden of
1,000 hours (10 respondents x 100 hours/respondent). On a deal-by-deal
basis, Commission staff estimates that it would take each NRSRO an
average of approximately: (i) One hour to review each ABS transaction
to review the relevant disclosures prepared by an issuer, which an
NRSRO would review as part of the rating process, and convert those
disclosures into a format suitable for inclusion in any report to be
issued by an NRSRO, and (ii) 10 hours per ABS transaction to compare
the terms of the current deal to those of similar securities. When the
Commission adopted Rule 17g-7, it estimated the average annual number
of ABS offerings to be 2,067 and the average number of credit ratings
per issuance of ABS to be four, resulting in 8,268 annual responses.\2\
Commission staff believes that these estimates continue to be valid
and, accordingly, estimates that the total industry-wide annual
reporting burden of complying with the disclosure requirements under
Rule 17g-7 is 90,948 hours (8,268 responses x 11 hours/response). As a
result, Commission staff estimates a total aggregate burden of 91,948
hours per year for complying with the rule (1,000 hours for reviewing
and updating benchmarks + 90,948 hours for complying with disclosure
requirements).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Rule 17g-7 Adopting Release, 76 FR at 4508.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compliance with Rule 17g-7 is mandatory. Responses to the
information collection will not be kept confidential and there is no
mandatory retention period for the collection of information.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
The public may view background documentation for this information
collection at the following Web site: www.reginfo.gov. Comments should
be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office Building,
Washington, DC 20503, or by sending an email to: Shagufta_Ahmed@omb.eop.gov; and (ii) Thomas Bayer, Director/Chief Information
Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi Pavlik-Simon, 100
F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, or by sending an email to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov. Comments must be submitted to OMB within 30 days of
this notice.
Dated: April 22, 2014.
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-09529 Filed 4-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P