General Motors, LLC, Grant of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 23402-23403 [2014-09498]
Download as PDF
23402
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 81 / Monday, April 28, 2014 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2013–0039; Notice 2]
General Motors, LLC, Grant of Petition
for Decision of Inconsequential
Noncompliance
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of Petition.
AGENCY:
General Motors, LLC (GM) has
determined that certain model year
(MY) 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
multipurpose passenger vehicles
(MPVs) manufactured on January 24,
2013 do not fully comply with
paragraph S6 of Federal Motor Vehicle
Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 205,
Glazing Materials. GM filed an
appropriate report dated February 22,
2013, pursuant to 49 CFR Part 573,
Defect and Noncompliance
Responsibility and Reports.
ADDRESSES: For further information on
this decision contact Luis Figueroa,
Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, the
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA), telephone
(202) 366–5298, facsimile (202) 366–
5930.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
IV. Rule Text
Paragraph S6 of FMVSS No. 205
specifically states:
II. Vehicles Involved
Affected are approximately 170 MY
2013 Chevrolet Equinox MPVs
manufactured on January 24, 2013.
S6. Certification and marking.
S6.1 A prime glazing material
manufacturer must certify, in accordance
with 49 U.S.C. 30115, each piece of glazing
material to which this standard applies that
is designed—
(a) As a component of any specific motor
vehicle or camper; or
(b) To be cut into components for use in
motor vehicles or items of motor vehicle
equipment.
S6.2 A prime glazing manufacturer
certifies its glazing by adding to the marks
required by section 7 of ANSI/SAE Z26.1–
1996, in letters and numerals of the same
size, the symbol ‘‘DOT’’ and a manufacturer’s
code mark that NHTSA assigns to the
manufacturer. NHTSA will assign a code
mark to a manufacturer after the
manufacturer submits a written request to the
Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance,
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20590. The request must
include the company name, address, and a
statement from the manufacturer certifying
its status as a prime glazing manufacturer as
defined in S4.
S6.3 A manufacturer or distributor who
cuts a section of glazing material to which
this standard applies, for use in a motor
vehicle or camper, must—
(a) Mark that material in accordance with
section 7 of ANSI/SAE Z26.1–1996; and
(b) Certify that its product complies with
this standard in accordance with 49 U.S.C.
30115.
III. Noncompliance
GM explains that the noncompliance
is that the vehicles are equipped with
left-rear quarter windows that do not
fully comply with the marking
V. Summary of GM’s Analyses
GM stated its belief that this
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety for the following
reasons:
I. GM’s Petition
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h) and the rule implementing
those provisions at 49 CFR Part 556, GM
has petitioned for an exemption from
the notification and remedy
requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301
on the basis that this noncompliance is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.
Notice of receipt of the petition was
published, with a 30-day public
comment period, on November 1, 2013
in the Federal Register (78 FR 65760).
No comments were received. To view
the petition and all supporting
documents log onto the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) Web site
at: https://www.regulations.gov/. Then
follow the online search instructions to
locate docket number ‘‘NHTSA–2013–
0039.’’
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
requirements specified in paragraph S6
of FMVSS No. 205.
GM further explained that the subject
vehicles may be purchased with either
solar glazing (having light transmittance
greater than 70%) or privacy glazing
(having light transmittance of
approximately 22%) installed rearward
of the driver. On the affected vehicles,
the left-rear quarter window is privacy
glazing; however it has markings
appropriate for solar glazing. The
correct privacy-glass markings and the
markings on the affected quarter
windows are as follows:
The specific noncompliance to
FMVSS No. 205 on the subject quarter
windows is the AS2 designation
(instead of AS3) and the M504 model
designation (instead of M513). The
transmissibility value on the subject
windows is also incorrect (70% instead
of 22%); however, this information is
not specified by FMVSS No. 205 and
therefore is not a compliance issue.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:06 Apr 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1. The subject glazing meets all
applicable performance requirements of
FMVSS No. 205. There is no safety
performance implication associated
with this technical noncompliance.
2. In addition to meeting all of the
component-level performance
requirements of FMVSS No. 205, the
subject glazing also fully meets the
vehicle-level installation requirements
specified by FMVSS No. 205. The
subject tempered-glass glazing at 22%
transmissibility is permitted in the leftrear quarter window location on the
affected vehicles.
3. The actual transmissibility of the
subject glazing (approximately 22%) is
consistent with all other glazing
rearward of the driver (i.e., the rear side
windows, the back window, and the
right-side rear quarter glazing) on the
affected vehicles. Accordingly, there is
no reason for the customer, state
inspection authorities, service
personnel, or anyone else to focus on or
detect any distinction involving the
subject left-side rear quarter window.
4. None of the subject population of
glazing will be available as service parts.
Therefore, if service replacement of the
left-rear quarter window on an affected
vehicle is required, the replacement part
would be correct and properly labeled
in accordance with all FMVSS No. 205
requirements.
5. Even in the extremely unlikely
event that a glazing corresponding to the
incorrect markings (i.e., solar glazing
with 70% transmittance) was installed
on an affected vehicle, this would also
be fully compliant to all requirements of
FMVSS No. 205, including the
component-level, vehicle-level and
marking requirements of the standard.
GM also stated its belief that NHTSA
has previously granted inconsequential
treatment for FMVSS No. 205 marking
noncompliances.
GM has additionally informed
NHTSA that it has corrected the
noncompliance so that all future
production vehicles will comply with
FMVSS No. 205.
In summation, GM believes that the
described noncompliance of its vehicles
is inconsequential to motor vehicle
safety, and that its petition, to exempt
from providing recall notification of
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C.
30118 and remedying the recall
noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C.
30120 should be granted.
VI. NHTSA Decision
The agency agrees with GM that the
noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety. The agency
believes that the true measure of
inconsequentiality to motor vehicle
E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM
28APN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 81 / Monday, April 28, 2014 / Notices
safety in this case is that there is no
effect of the noncompliance on the
operational safety of the subject vehicles
in which the subject glazing is used. In
the agency’s judgment, this
noncompliance to the labeling
requirements in FMVSS 205 will have
an inconsequential effect on motor
vehicle safety because:
The affected vehicles are equipped
with solar glazing and privacy glazing.
While the light transmittance value that
appears on the affected glazing was not
marked in accordance with GM’s
requirements, there is no FMVSS No.
205 labeling requirement for light
transmittance value.
The subject glazing meets the
component level and the vehicle-level
installation requirements specified by
FMVSS No. 205. The subject glazing
meets all performance requirements
specified by FMVSS 205. None of the
subject population of glazing will be
available as service parts. If service
replacement of the left-rear quarter
window on an affected vehicle is
required, the replacement part would be
correct and properly labeled in
accordance with all FMVSS No. 205
requirements. Therefore, there are no
safety implication concerns with this
noncompliance.
In consideration of the foregoing,
NHTSA has decided that GM has met its
burden of persuasion that the FMVSS
No. 205 noncompliance is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.
Accordingly, GM’s petition is hereby
granted and GM is exempted from the
obligation of providing notification of,
and a remedy for, that noncompliance
under 49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120.
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
file petitions for a determination of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance. Therefore, this
decision only applies to the subject
nonconforming vehicles that GM no
longer controlled at the time it
determined that the noncompliance
existed. However, the granting of this
petition does not relieve vehicle
distributors and dealers of the
prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale,
or introduction or delivery for
introduction into interstate commerce of
the noncompliant vehicles under their
control after GM notified them that the
subject noncompliance existed.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:06 Apr 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
501.8.
Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
Acting Director, Office of Vehicle Safety
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014–09498 Filed 4–25–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
[Docket No. PHMSA–2013–0004]
Pipeline Safety: Information Collection
Activities, Revision to Gas Distribution
Annual Report
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
PHMSA is preparing to
request Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) approval for the revision
of the gas distribution annual report
currently approved under OMB control
number 2137–0522. In addition to
making several minor changes to the
report, PHMSA will also request a new
OMB control number for this
information collection. In accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, PHMSA invites comments on the
proposed revisions to the form and
instructions.
SUMMARY:
Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before June 27,
2014.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted in the following ways:
E-Gov Web Site: https://
www.regulations.gov. This site allows
the public to enter comments on any
Federal Register notice issued by any
agency.
Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation
(DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
West Building, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
Hand Delivery: Room W12–140 on the
ground level of DOT, West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9:00 a.m. and
5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Instructions: Identify the docket
number, PHMSA–2013–0004, at the
beginning of your comments. Note that
all comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
23403
personal information provided. You
should know that anyone is able to
search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our
dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the
comment, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
Therefore, you may want to review
DOT’s complete Privacy Act Statement
in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19476) or visit
https://www.regulations.gov before
submitting any such comments.
Docket: For access to the docket or to
read background documents or
comments, go to https://
www.regulations.gov at any time or to
Room W12–140 on the ground level of
DOT, West Building, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
If you wish to receive confirmation of
receipt of your written comments,
please include a self-addressed,
stamped postcard with the following
statement: ‘‘Comments on: PHMSA–
2013–0004.’’ The docket clerk will date
stamp the postcard prior to returning it
to you via the U.S. mail. Please note that
due to delays in the delivery of U.S.
mail to Federal offices in Washington,
DC, we recommend that persons
consider an alternative method
(internet, fax, or professional delivery
service) of submitting comments to the
docket and ensuring their timely receipt
at DOT.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Angela Dow by telephone at 202–366–
1246, by fax at 202–366–4566, or by
mail at DOT, PHMSA, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., PHP–30, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
Section 1320.8(d), Title 5, Code of
Federal Regulations, requires PHMSA to
provide interested members of the
public and affected agencies an
opportunity to comment on information
collection and recordkeeping requests.
This notice identifies an information
collection request for the gas
distribution annual report that PHMSA
will be submitting to OMB for approval.
PHMSA made a similar proposal on
February 13, 2013. Based on comments
received, PHMSA has now eliminated
redundancies in the leak cause category
descriptions.
B. Gas Distribution Annual Report
PHMSA intends to revise the gas
distribution annual report (PHMSA F
7100.1–1, gas distribution annual
E:\FR\FM\28APN1.SGM
28APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 81 (Monday, April 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23402-23403]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-09498]
[[Page 23402]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2013-0039; Notice 2]
General Motors, LLC, Grant of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Grant of Petition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: General Motors, LLC (GM) has determined that certain model
year (MY) 2013 Chevrolet Equinox multipurpose passenger vehicles (MPVs)
manufactured on January 24, 2013 do not fully comply with paragraph S6
of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 205, Glazing
Materials. GM filed an appropriate report dated February 22, 2013,
pursuant to 49 CFR Part 573, Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility
and Reports.
ADDRESSES: For further information on this decision contact Luis
Figueroa, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), telephone (202) 366-5298,
facsimile (202) 366-5930.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. GM's Petition
Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and the rule
implementing those provisions at 49 CFR Part 556, GM has petitioned for
an exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety.
Notice of receipt of the petition was published, with a 30-day
public comment period, on November 1, 2013 in the Federal Register (78
FR 65760). No comments were received. To view the petition and all
supporting documents log onto the Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) Web site at: https://www.regulations.gov/. Then follow the online
search instructions to locate docket number ``NHTSA-2013-0039.''
II. Vehicles Involved
Affected are approximately 170 MY 2013 Chevrolet Equinox MPVs
manufactured on January 24, 2013.
III. Noncompliance
GM explains that the noncompliance is that the vehicles are
equipped with left-rear quarter windows that do not fully comply with
the marking requirements specified in paragraph S6 of FMVSS No. 205.
GM further explained that the subject vehicles may be purchased
with either solar glazing (having light transmittance greater than 70%)
or privacy glazing (having light transmittance of approximately 22%)
installed rearward of the driver. On the affected vehicles, the left-
rear quarter window is privacy glazing; however it has markings
appropriate for solar glazing. The correct privacy-glass markings and
the markings on the affected quarter windows are as follows:
The specific noncompliance to FMVSS No. 205 on the subject quarter
windows is the AS2 designation (instead of AS3) and the M504 model
designation (instead of M513). The transmissibility value on the
subject windows is also incorrect (70% instead of 22%); however, this
information is not specified by FMVSS No. 205 and therefore is not a
compliance issue.
IV. Rule Text
Paragraph S6 of FMVSS No. 205 specifically states:
S6. Certification and marking.
S6.1 A prime glazing material manufacturer must certify, in
accordance with 49 U.S.C. 30115, each piece of glazing material to
which this standard applies that is designed--
(a) As a component of any specific motor vehicle or camper; or
(b) To be cut into components for use in motor vehicles or items
of motor vehicle equipment.
S6.2 A prime glazing manufacturer certifies its glazing by
adding to the marks required by section 7 of ANSI/SAE Z26.1-1996, in
letters and numerals of the same size, the symbol ``DOT'' and a
manufacturer's code mark that NHTSA assigns to the manufacturer.
NHTSA will assign a code mark to a manufacturer after the
manufacturer submits a written request to the Office of Vehicle
Safety Compliance, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590. The request must
include the company name, address, and a statement from the
manufacturer certifying its status as a prime glazing manufacturer
as defined in S4.
S6.3 A manufacturer or distributor who cuts a section of glazing
material to which this standard applies, for use in a motor vehicle
or camper, must--
(a) Mark that material in accordance with section 7 of ANSI/SAE
Z26.1-1996; and
(b) Certify that its product complies with this standard in
accordance with 49 U.S.C. 30115.
V. Summary of GM's Analyses
GM stated its belief that this noncompliance is inconsequential to
motor vehicle safety for the following reasons:
1. The subject glazing meets all applicable performance
requirements of FMVSS No. 205. There is no safety performance
implication associated with this technical noncompliance.
2. In addition to meeting all of the component-level performance
requirements of FMVSS No. 205, the subject glazing also fully meets the
vehicle-level installation requirements specified by FMVSS No. 205. The
subject tempered-glass glazing at 22% transmissibility is permitted in
the left-rear quarter window location on the affected vehicles.
3. The actual transmissibility of the subject glazing
(approximately 22%) is consistent with all other glazing rearward of
the driver (i.e., the rear side windows, the back window, and the
right-side rear quarter glazing) on the affected vehicles. Accordingly,
there is no reason for the customer, state inspection authorities,
service personnel, or anyone else to focus on or detect any distinction
involving the subject left-side rear quarter window.
4. None of the subject population of glazing will be available as
service parts. Therefore, if service replacement of the left-rear
quarter window on an affected vehicle is required, the replacement part
would be correct and properly labeled in accordance with all FMVSS No.
205 requirements.
5. Even in the extremely unlikely event that a glazing
corresponding to the incorrect markings (i.e., solar glazing with 70%
transmittance) was installed on an affected vehicle, this would also be
fully compliant to all requirements of FMVSS No. 205, including the
component-level, vehicle-level and marking requirements of the
standard.
GM also stated its belief that NHTSA has previously granted
inconsequential treatment for FMVSS No. 205 marking noncompliances.
GM has additionally informed NHTSA that it has corrected the
noncompliance so that all future production vehicles will comply with
FMVSS No. 205.
In summation, GM believes that the described noncompliance of its
vehicles is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety, and that its
petition, to exempt from providing recall notification of noncompliance
as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118 and remedying the recall noncompliance
as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120 should be granted.
VI. NHTSA Decision
The agency agrees with GM that the noncompliance is inconsequential
to motor vehicle safety. The agency believes that the true measure of
inconsequentiality to motor vehicle
[[Page 23403]]
safety in this case is that there is no effect of the noncompliance on
the operational safety of the subject vehicles in which the subject
glazing is used. In the agency's judgment, this noncompliance to the
labeling requirements in FMVSS 205 will have an inconsequential effect
on motor vehicle safety because:
The affected vehicles are equipped with solar glazing and privacy
glazing. While the light transmittance value that appears on the
affected glazing was not marked in accordance with GM's requirements,
there is no FMVSS No. 205 labeling requirement for light transmittance
value.
The subject glazing meets the component level and the vehicle-level
installation requirements specified by FMVSS No. 205. The subject
glazing meets all performance requirements specified by FMVSS 205. None
of the subject population of glazing will be available as service
parts. If service replacement of the left-rear quarter window on an
affected vehicle is required, the replacement part would be correct and
properly labeled in accordance with all FMVSS No. 205 requirements.
Therefore, there are no safety implication concerns with this
noncompliance.
In consideration of the foregoing, NHTSA has decided that GM has
met its burden of persuasion that the FMVSS No. 205 noncompliance is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. Accordingly, GM's petition is
hereby granted and GM is exempted from the obligation of providing
notification of, and a remedy for, that noncompliance under 49 U.S.C.
30118 and 30120.
NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, this decision
only applies to the subject nonconforming vehicles that GM no longer
controlled at the time it determined that the noncompliance existed.
However, the granting of this petition does not relieve vehicle
distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for
sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate
commerce of the noncompliant vehicles under their control after GM
notified them that the subject noncompliance existed.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at
49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8.
Jeffrey M. Giuseppe,
Acting Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014-09498 Filed 4-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P