Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and New Shipper Review; 2011-2012, 22947-22949 [2014-09479]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 80 / Friday, April 25, 2014 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Foreign-Trade Zones Board International Trade Administration Background [A–570–848] [Order No. 1935] Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 37 (Expansion of Service Area) Under Alternative Site Framework; Orange County, New York Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order: Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (15 CFR § 400.2(c)) as an option for the establishment or reorganization of zones; Whereas, the County of Orange, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 37, submitted an application to the Board (FTZ Docket B–14–2013, docketed 2– 11–2013) for authority to expand the service area of the zone to include Rockland County, as described in the application, adjacent to the Newark/ New York Customs and Border Protection port of entry; Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal Register (78 FR 12033–12034, 2–21– 2013) and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations; and, Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner’s report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations are satisfied; Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders: The application to reorganize FTZ 37 to expand the service area under the ASF is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, including Section 400.13, and to the Board’s standard 2,000-acre activation limit for the zone. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 22947 Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of April 2014. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board. [FR Doc. 2014–09481 Filed 4–24–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:57 Apr 24, 2014 Jkt 232001 Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and New Shipper Review; 2011–2012 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce SUMMARY: On October 3, 2013, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published in the Federal Register the preliminary results of the administrative review and new shipper review of the antidumping duty order on freshwater crawfish tail meat from the People’s Republic of China (the PRC).1 The period of review (POR) for the administrative review is September 1, 2011, through August 31, 2012, and the POR for the new shipper review is September 1, 2011 through September 30, 2012. These reviews cover four producers/exporters of subject merchandise: Nanjing Gemsen International Co., Ltd. (Nanjing Gemsen), Xiping Opeck Food Co., Ltd. (Xiping Opeck), Yancheng Hi-King Agriculture Developing Co., Ltd. (Yancheng Hi-King), and Deyan Aquatic Products and Food Co., Ltd. (Deyan Aquatic, the new shipper). We invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. Based on our analysis of the comments received, we made a change to our margin calculations. However, for the final results, we continue to find that the companies covered by these reviews did not make sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value. DATES: Effective Date: April 25, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandra Dreisonstok or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0768 or (202) 482–1690, respectively. AGENCY: 1 See Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and New Shipper Review; 2011–2012, 78 FR 61331 (October 3, 2013) (Preliminary Results). Also, on February 12, 2013, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.214(j)(3), the Department aligned the new shipper review with the administrative review. See Memorandum to the File from Dustin Ross, Case Analyst, ‘‘Alignment of New Shipper Review of Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the People’s Republic of China with the concurrent administrative review of Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the People’s Republic of China’’ dated February 12, 2013. PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 On October 3, 2013, the Department published the Preliminary Results of these reviews. On January 24, 2014, we issued a memorandum extending the time limit for the final results of these reviews to April 21, 2014.2 The Department gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on the Preliminary Results. We received a case brief from the petitioner, Crawfish Processors Alliance (CPA) on January 14, 2014, and rebuttal briefs from Xiping Opeck on January 21, 2014, and from Deyan Aquatic and Yancheng Hi-King on January 22, 2014. We conducted these reviews in accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B) and 751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the antidumping duty order is freshwater crawfish tail meat, which is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheadings 1605.40.10.10, 1605.40.10.90, 0306.19.00.10, and 0306.29.00.00. On February 10, 2012, the Department added HTSUS classification number 0306.29.01.00 to the scope description pursuant to a request by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). The HTSUS numbers are provided for convenience and customs purposes only. The written description of the scope is dispositive. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum,3 which is hereby adopted by this notice. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case briefs by parties to these reviews are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues raised is attached to this notice as an appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically 2 See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the People’s Republic of China: Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and New Shipper Review; 2011–2012’’ dated January 24, 2014. 3 See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from James Maeder, Director, Office II, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and New Shipper Review of Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the People’s Republic of China’’ dated concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). E:\FR\FM\25APN1.SGM 25APN1 22948 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 80 / Friday, April 25, 2014 / Notices via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS). Access to IA ACCESS is available to registered users at http:// iaaccess.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Enforcement and Compliance Web site at http:// enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Final Determination of No Shipments For these final results, we continue to find that China Kingdom (Beijing) Import & Export Co., Ltd. (China Kingdom), Shanghai Ocean Flavor International Trading Co., Ltd. (Shanghai Ocean Flavor), and Xuzhou Jinjiang Foodstuffs Co., Ltd. (Xuzhou Jinjiang), which have separate rates, had no shipments during the POR.4 Consistent with the Department’s refinement to its assessment practice in NME cases regarding no shipment claims, we are completing the administrative review with respect to China Kingdom, Shanghai Ocean Flavor, and Xuzhou Jinjiang, and will issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final results of the administrative review.5 Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on our analysis of comments received, we made a change to our calculations for these final results. Specifically, we altered our method of valuing crawfish shell from the Preliminary Results. For further details, see the company-specific analysis memoranda dated concurrently with this notice and the Issues and Decision Memorandum. mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Final Results of the Review For the final result of the administrative review, we determine that the following percentage weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the period September 1, 2011, through August 31, 2012: 4 See Preliminary Results. Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) and the ‘‘Assessment Rates’’ section below. 5 See VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:57 Apr 24, 2014 Jkt 232001 publication of the final results of the administrative review for all shipments Margin of the subject merchandise entered, or Company (percent) withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication Nanjing Gemsen International date as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) Co., Ltd ................................. 0.00 Xiping Opeck Food Co., Ltd ..... 0.00 of the Act: (1) For subject merchandise exported by the companies listed above Yancheng Hi-King Agriculture Developing Co., Ltd 6 ............ 0.00 that have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in the final results of the administrative For the result of the new shipper review for each exporter as listed above, review, the Department determines that except if the rate is zero or de minimis, a dumping margin of 0.00 percent exists then no cash deposit will be required for for merchandise produced and exported that exporter; (2) for previously by Deyan Aquatic Products and Food investigated companies not listed above Co., Ltd. covering the period September that have separate rates, the cash 1, 2011, through September 30, 2012. deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the Assessment investigation; (3) for all other PRC The Department will determine, and exporters of subject merchandise which CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on have not been found to be entitled to a all appropriate entries covered by these separate rate, the cash deposit rate will reviews.7 We intend to issue assessment be the PRC-wide rate of 223.01 percent; instructions to CBP 15 days after the and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of date of publication of these final results subject merchandise which have not of reviews. For Nanjing Gemsen, Xiping received their own rate, the cash deposit Opeck, Yancheng Hi-King, and Deyan rate will be the rate applicable to the Aquatic we will instruct CBP to PRC entity that supplied that non-PRC liquidate all entries during the exporter. respective PORs without regard to With respect to Deyan Aquatic, the antidumping duties because their respondent in the new shipper review, weighted-average dumping margins in the Department established a these final results are zero.8 combination cash deposit rate for this Pursuant to the Department’s company consistent with its practice as refinement to its assessment practice in follows: (1) For subject merchandise NME cases,9 for entries that were not produced and exported by Deyan reported in the U.S. sales databases Aquatic, the cash deposit rate will be submitted by companies individually the rate established for Deyan Aquatic examined during this review, the in the final results of the new shipper Department will instruct CBP to review; (2) for subject merchandise liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide exported by Deyan Aquatic, but not rate. In addition, if the Department produced by Deyan Aquatic, the cash determines that an exporter under deposit rate will be the rate for the PRCreview had no shipments of the subject wide entity; and (3) for subject merchandise, any suspended entries merchandise produced by Deyan that entered under that exporter’s case Aquatic but not exported by Deyan number (i.e., at that exporter’s rate) will Aquatic, the cash deposit rate will be be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate. the rate applicable to the exporter. These deposit requirements, when Cash Deposit Requirements imposed, shall remain in effect until The following cash deposit further notice. requirements will be effective upon Disclosure 6 For these final results, we continue to find that We intend to disclose the calculations Yancheng Hi-King and its affiliates, Yancheng performed regarding these final results Seastar Seafood Co., Ltd., Wuhan Hi-King within five days of the date of Agriculture Development Co., Ltd., Yancheng Hipublication of this notice in accordance King Frozen Food Co., Ltd., Jiangxi Hi-King Poyang Lake Seafood Co., Ltd., and Yancheng Hi-King with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Aquatic Growing Co., Ltd., are a single entity for the purpose of calculating an antidumping duty margin. See Issues and Decision Memorandum. 7 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 8 See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). 9 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Notifications This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could E:\FR\FM\25APN1.SGM 25APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 80 / Friday, April 25, 2014 / Notices result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. These final results of reviews are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1), 751(a)(2)(B)(iv), 751(a)(3), 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h), 351.214 and 351.221(b)(4). Dated: April 21, 2014. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum: A. Summary B. Background C. Surrogate Country D. Affiliation E. Separate Rates F. Discussion of the Issue 1. Selection of Surrogate Value for Crawfish Shell G. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2014–09479 Filed 4–24–14; 8:45 am] Special Accommodations These meetings are physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be directed to Gail Bendixen at (907) 271–2809 at least 7 working days prior to the meeting date. BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration RIN 0648–XD263 Dated: April 22, 2014. Tracey L. Thompson, Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. North Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meetings National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. AGENCY: mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES ACTION: The North Pacific Fishery Management Council’s (Council) Electronic Monitoring (EM) workgroup will meet in Anchorage, AK. SUMMARY: The meetings will be held May 15–16, 2014, from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. on the 15th and 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. on the 16th. VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:57 Apr 24, 2014 Jkt 232001 [FR Doc. 2014–09428 Filed 4–24–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–22–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Notice of public meetings. DATES: The meetings will be held at the Clarion Suites, 1110 W. 8th Avenue, Heritage Room, Anchorage, AK. Council address: North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 605 W. 4th Ave., Suite 306, Anchorage, AK 99501–2252. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diana Evans, Council staff; telephone: (907) 271–2809. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The workgroup will review study designs for the different research tracks going forward as part of the 2014–15 EM cooperative research program, and providing input on data protocols. The Workgroup will also review how the research will inform the Council’s objectives for estimating catch and discards, and will identify a timeline, milestones, and decision points for integrating EM into the Observer Program. The Agenda is subject to change, and the latest version will be posted at http://www.npfmc.org/. Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come before this group for discussion, those issues may not be the subject of formal action during these meetings. Action will be restricted to those issues specifically listed in this notice and any issues arising after publication of this notice that require emergency action under section 305(c) of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, provided the public has been notified of the Council’s intent to take final action to address the emergency. ADDRESSES: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration RIN 0648–XD255 Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 22949 Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notice of a public meeting. The Mid-Atlantic Council (Mid-Atlantic Council) will host a meeting of the Council Coordination Committee (CCC) consisting of the eight Regional Fishery Management Council (RFMC) chairs, vice chairs, and executive directors and its subcommittees in May 2014. The intent of this meeting is to discuss issues of relevance to the Councils, including: budget issues, MSA reauthorization, habitat issues, allocation working group report, bycatch and IUU certification, climate change, enforcement activities, Council Operational Guidelines, other topics of concern to the RFMC, and decisions and follow-up activities. DATES: The meeting will be held May 12–15, 2014. Registration for the meeting will begin at 3 p.m. on Monday, May 12, 2014. The substantive meeting topics begin at 10 a.m. on Tuesday, May 13th and recess at 5:30 p.m. or when business is complete. The meeting will reconvene at 9 a.m. on Wednesday, May 14, 2014 and recess at 5 p.m. or when business is complete. The meeting will reconvene on the final day at 9 a.m. on Thursday, May 15, 2014 and adjourn by 1 p.m. or when business is complete. ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Hilton Virginia Beach Oceanfront, 3001 Atlantic Avenue, Virginia Beach, VA 23451; telephone: (757) 213–3000. Council address: 800 North State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901– 3910. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Christopher Moore, Executive Director; telephone: (302) 674–2331 or (877) 446– 2362 toll free; or access the Mid-Atlantic Council Web site at www.mafmc.org for the current meeting location, proposed agenda, and meeting briefing materials. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Reauthorization Act (MSA) of 2006 established the CCC by amending Section 302 (16 U.S.C. 1852) of the MSA. The committee consists of the chairs, vice chairs, and executive directors of each of the eight Regional Fishery Management Councils authorized by the MSA or other Council members or staff. The Web site (found at www.mafmc.org) has materials relevant to the discussions at the CCC meeting. On Monday, May 12—Registration begins. On Tuesday, May 13—The meeting will begin with Welcome and Introductions. The discussion on SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\25APN1.SGM 25APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 80 (Friday, April 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22947-22949]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-09479]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-848]


Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From the People's Republic of 
China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and New 
Shipper Review; 2011-2012

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce

SUMMARY: On October 3, 2013, the Department of Commerce (the 
Department) published in the Federal Register the preliminary results 
of the administrative review and new shipper review of the antidumping 
duty order on freshwater crawfish tail meat from the People's Republic 
of China (the PRC).\1\ The period of review (POR) for the 
administrative review is September 1, 2011, through August 31, 2012, 
and the POR for the new shipper review is September 1, 2011 through 
September 30, 2012. These reviews cover four producers/exporters of 
subject merchandise: Nanjing Gemsen International Co., Ltd. (Nanjing 
Gemsen), Xiping Opeck Food Co., Ltd. (Xiping Opeck), Yancheng Hi-King 
Agriculture Developing Co., Ltd. (Yancheng Hi-King), and Deyan Aquatic 
Products and Food Co., Ltd. (Deyan Aquatic, the new shipper). We 
invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. Based on our 
analysis of the comments received, we made a change to our margin 
calculations. However, for the final results, we continue to find that 
the companies covered by these reviews did not make sales of subject 
merchandise at less than normal value.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat From the People's Republic 
of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review and New Shipper Review; 2011-2012, 78 FR 61331 (October 3, 
2013) (Preliminary Results). Also, on February 12, 2013, in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.214(j)(3), the Department aligned the new 
shipper review with the administrative review. See Memorandum to the 
File from Dustin Ross, Case Analyst, ``Alignment of New Shipper 
Review of Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the People's Republic 
of China with the concurrent administrative review of Freshwater 
Crawfish Tail Meat from the People's Republic of China'' dated 
February 12, 2013.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: April 25, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandra Dreisonstok or Minoo Hatten, 
AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0768 or (202) 482-1690, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On October 3, 2013, the Department published the Preliminary 
Results of these reviews. On January 24, 2014, we issued a memorandum 
extending the time limit for the final results of these reviews to 
April 21, 2014.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant 
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, 
``Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat from the People's Republic of China: 
Extension of Time Limit for Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review and New Shipper Review; 2011-2012'' dated 
January 24, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on 
the Preliminary Results. We received a case brief from the petitioner, 
Crawfish Processors Alliance (CPA) on January 14, 2014, and rebuttal 
briefs from Xiping Opeck on January 21, 2014, and from Deyan Aquatic 
and Yancheng Hi-King on January 22, 2014.
    We conducted these reviews in accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B) 
and 751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise subject to the antidumping duty order is freshwater 
crawfish tail meat, which is currently classified in the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under subheadings 
1605.40.10.10, 1605.40.10.90, 0306.19.00.10, and 0306.29.00.00. On 
February 10, 2012, the Department added HTSUS classification number 
0306.29.01.00 to the scope description pursuant to a request by U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection (CBP). The HTSUS numbers are provided for 
convenience and customs purposes only. The written description of the 
scope is dispositive. A full description of the scope of the order is 
contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum,\3\ which is hereby 
adopted by this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for 
Enforcement and Compliance, from James Maeder, Director, Office II, 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ``Issues and 
Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review and New Shipper Review of Freshwater Crawfish 
Tail Meat from the People's Republic of China'' dated concurrently 
with and hereby adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision 
Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case briefs by parties to these reviews 
are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the 
issues raised is attached to this notice as an appendix. The Issues and 
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically

[[Page 22948]]

via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS). Access to IA ACCESS 
is available to registered users at http://iaaccess.trade.gov and is 
available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the 
main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version 
of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the 
Enforcement and Compliance Web site at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the 
electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical 
in content.

Final Determination of No Shipments

    For these final results, we continue to find that China Kingdom 
(Beijing) Import & Export Co., Ltd. (China Kingdom), Shanghai Ocean 
Flavor International Trading Co., Ltd. (Shanghai Ocean Flavor), and 
Xuzhou Jinjiang Foodstuffs Co., Ltd. (Xuzhou Jinjiang), which have 
separate rates, had no shipments during the POR.\4\ Consistent with the 
Department's refinement to its assessment practice in NME cases 
regarding no shipment claims, we are completing the administrative 
review with respect to China Kingdom, Shanghai Ocean Flavor, and Xuzhou 
Jinjiang, and will issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the 
final results of the administrative review.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Preliminary Results.
    \5\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment 
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) and the 
``Assessment Rates'' section below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on our analysis of comments received, we made a change to our 
calculations for these final results. Specifically, we altered our 
method of valuing crawfish shell from the Preliminary Results. For 
further details, see the company-specific analysis memoranda dated 
concurrently with this notice and the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Final Results of the Review

    For the final result of the administrative review, we determine 
that the following percentage weighted-average dumping margins exist 
for the period September 1, 2011, through August 31, 2012:

 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Margin
                          Company                             (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nanjing Gemsen International Co., Ltd......................         0.00
Xiping Opeck Food Co., Ltd.................................         0.00
Yancheng Hi-King Agriculture Developing Co., Ltd \6\.......         0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------

     
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ For these final results, we continue to find that Yancheng 
Hi-King and its affiliates, Yancheng Seastar Seafood Co., Ltd., 
Wuhan Hi-King Agriculture Development Co., Ltd., Yancheng Hi-King 
Frozen Food Co., Ltd., Jiangxi Hi-King Poyang Lake Seafood Co., 
Ltd., and Yancheng Hi-King Aquatic Growing Co., Ltd., are a single 
entity for the purpose of calculating an antidumping duty margin. 
See Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the result of the new shipper review, the Department determines 
that a dumping margin of 0.00 percent exists for merchandise produced 
and exported by Deyan Aquatic Products and Food Co., Ltd. covering the 
period September 1, 2011, through September 30, 2012.

Assessment

    The Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping 
duties on all appropriate entries covered by these reviews.\7\ We 
intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date 
of publication of these final results of reviews. For Nanjing Gemsen, 
Xiping Opeck, Yancheng Hi-King, and Deyan Aquatic we will instruct CBP 
to liquidate all entries during the respective PORs without regard to 
antidumping duties because their weighted-average dumping margins in 
these final results are zero.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
    \8\ See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 
Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 
2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to the Department's refinement to its assessment practice 
in NME cases,\9\ for entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales 
databases submitted by companies individually examined during this 
review, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at 
the PRC-wide rate. In addition, if the Department determines that an 
exporter under review had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any 
suspended entries that entered under that exporter's case number (i.e., 
at that exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment 
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the final results of the administrative review for all 
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date as provided 
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For subject merchandise 
exported by the companies listed above that have separate rates, the 
cash deposit rate will be the rate established in the final results of 
the administrative review for each exporter as listed above, except if 
the rate is zero or de minimis, then no cash deposit will be required 
for that exporter; (2) for previously investigated companies not listed 
above that have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to 
be the company-specific rate published for the investigation; (3) for 
all other PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not been 
found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be 
the PRC-wide rate of 223.01 percent; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters 
of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash 
deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC entity that 
supplied that non-PRC exporter.
    With respect to Deyan Aquatic, the respondent in the new shipper 
review, the Department established a combination cash deposit rate for 
this company consistent with its practice as follows: (1) For subject 
merchandise produced and exported by Deyan Aquatic, the cash deposit 
rate will be the rate established for Deyan Aquatic in the final 
results of the new shipper review; (2) for subject merchandise exported 
by Deyan Aquatic, but not produced by Deyan Aquatic, the cash deposit 
rate will be the rate for the PRC-wide entity; and (3) for subject 
merchandise produced by Deyan Aquatic but not exported by Deyan 
Aquatic, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the 
exporter.
    These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect 
until further notice.

Disclosure

    We intend to disclose the calculations performed regarding these 
final results within five days of the date of publication of this 
notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Notifications

    This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could

[[Page 22949]]

result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping 
duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping 
duties.
    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable 
violation.
    These final results of reviews are issued and published in 
accordance with sections 751(a)(1), 751(a)(2)(B)(iv), 751(a)(3), 777(i) 
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h), 351.214 and 351.221(b)(4).

    Dated: April 21, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum:

A. Summary
B. Background
C. Surrogate Country
D. Affiliation
E. Separate Rates
F. Discussion of the Issue
    1. Selection of Surrogate Value for Crawfish Shell
G. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2014-09479 Filed 4-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P