Certain Marine Sonar Imaging Devices, Products Containing the Same, and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Determination not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on a Settlement Agreement; Termination of Investigation, 22835 [2014-09313]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 79 / Thursday, April 24, 2014 / Notices February 7, 2014, the parties resubmitted the public version of the settlement agreement. On the same day, OUII wrote a letter to the Secretary to the Commission, withdrawing its opposition. After considering the joint motion, and the settlement agreement, the Commission agrees that the joint motion to terminate is in the interest of the public, and complies with the requirements of Commission rule 210.21(b). The Commission has therefore determined to grant the motion to terminate the investigation on the basis of a settlement agreement and to dismiss the motion for sanctions. The Commission has further determined to dismiss as moot the private parties’ motions for leave to file a reply and to file a surreply and to not accept for filing any submissions not previously accepted given that the case has been mooted by settlement. The investigation is hereby terminated. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR Part 210). Issued: April 18, 2014. By order of the Commission. Lisa R. Barton, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2014–09298 Filed 4–23–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–853] Certain Marine Sonar Imaging Devices, Products Containing the Same, and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Determination not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on a Settlement Agreement; Termination of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 12) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) on March 24, 2014, granting the parties’ motion to terminate the investigation based on a settlement agreement. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Needham, Office of the General pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:19 Apr 23, 2014 Jkt 232001 Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–5468. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on November 13, 2013, based on a complaint filed by Navico, Inc. and Navico Holding AS (‘‘Navico’’). 78 FR 68091–92. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section 337’’), in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain marine sonar imaging devices, products containing the same, and components thereof, by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,300,499 and 8,305,840. The Commission’s notice of investigation named as respondents Raymarine, Inc. of Nashua, New Hampshire; Raymarine UK Ltd. of Fareham, United Kingdom; and In-Tech Electronics Ltd. of Hong Kong. The notice of investigation was later amended to add as respondents Raymarine Belgium BVBA, In-Tech Electronics (Shenzhen) Ltd., and InTech Science & Technology R&D Ltd. On March 19, 2014, all parties filed a joint motion to terminate the investigation based on a settlement agreement. The parties attached a settlement agreement, and indicated that there are no other agreements, written or oral, express or implied, between Navico and any of the respondents concerning the subject matter of this investigation. The parties also stated that the termination of the investigation would not harm the public interest, and that it is in the interest of public and administrative economy to grant the motion. On March 24, 2014, the ALJ granted the parties’ motion, and issued the PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 22835 subject ID, terminating the investigation based on a settlement agreement. The ALJ found that termination was in the public interest, and that the motion complied with applicable Commission rules. See, e.g., 19 CFR 210.21(a)(2) and (b)(1), 210.50(b)(2). No petitions for review were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR Part 210). Dated: April 21, 2014. By order of the Commission. William R. Bishop, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2014–09313 Filed 4–23–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [USITC SE–14–012] Government in The Sunshine Act Meeting Notice United States International Trade Commission. TIME AND DATE: May 2, 2014 at 11:00 a.m. PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205–2000. STATUS: Open to the public. MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 1. Agendas for future meetings: None. 2. Minutes. 3. Ratification List. 4. Vote in Inv. No. 731–TA–1206 (Final) (Diffusion-Annealed, Nickel-Plated Flat-Rolled Steel Products from Japan). The Commission is currently scheduled to complete and file its determinations and views of the Commission on May 16, 2014. 5. Outstanding action jackets: None. In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: By order of the Commission. Issued: April 21, 2014. William R. Bishop, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2014–09399 Filed 4–22–14; 11:15 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM 24APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 79 (Thursday, April 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 22835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-09313]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-853]


Certain Marine Sonar Imaging Devices, Products Containing the 
Same, and Components Thereof; Notice of Commission Determination not To 
Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation Based on 
a Settlement Agreement; Termination of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 12) issued by the presiding administrative law 
judge (``ALJ'') on March 24, 2014, granting the parties' motion to 
terminate the investigation based on a settlement agreement.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Needham, Office of the General 
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-5468. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on November 13, 2013, based on a complaint filed by Navico, Inc. and 
Navico Holding AS (``Navico''). 78 FR 68091-92. The complaint alleges 
violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 
U.S.C. 1337 (``section 337''), in the importation into the United 
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States 
after importation of certain marine sonar imaging devices, products 
containing the same, and components thereof, by reason of infringement 
of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,300,499 and 8,305,840. The 
Commission's notice of investigation named as respondents Raymarine, 
Inc. of Nashua, New Hampshire; Raymarine UK Ltd. of Fareham, United 
Kingdom; and In-Tech Electronics Ltd. of Hong Kong. The notice of 
investigation was later amended to add as respondents Raymarine Belgium 
BVBA, In-Tech Electronics (Shenzhen) Ltd., and In-Tech Science & 
Technology R&D Ltd.
    On March 19, 2014, all parties filed a joint motion to terminate 
the investigation based on a settlement agreement. The parties attached 
a settlement agreement, and indicated that there are no other 
agreements, written or oral, express or implied, between Navico and any 
of the respondents concerning the subject matter of this investigation. 
The parties also stated that the termination of the investigation would 
not harm the public interest, and that it is in the interest of public 
and administrative economy to grant the motion.
    On March 24, 2014, the ALJ granted the parties' motion, and issued 
the subject ID, terminating the investigation based on a settlement 
agreement. The ALJ found that termination was in the public interest, 
and that the motion complied with applicable Commission rules. See, 
e.g., 19 CFR 210.21(a)(2) and (b)(1), 210.50(b)(2). No petitions for 
review were filed.
    The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
Part 210).

     Dated: April 21, 2014.

    By order of the Commission.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-09313 Filed 4-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.