Uncovered Innerspring Units From the People's Republic of China, South Africa, and Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Orders, 22624-22625 [2014-09275]
Download as PDF
22624
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 78 / Wednesday, April 23, 2014 / Notices
d. Calculation of Normal Value Based on
Comparison Market Prices
F. Currency Conversion
G. Recommendation
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–520–803]
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet
and Strip From the United Arab
Emirates: Partial Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2012–2013
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce
DATES: Effective Date: April 23, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrew Huston, Office VII,
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4261.
AGENCY:
Background
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
On November 1, 2013, the Department
of Commerce (Department) published a
notice of opportunity to request an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty (AD) order on
polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet
and strip from the United Arab Emirates
covering the period November 1, 2012,
through October 31, 2013.1 The
Department received a timely request
from Petitioners 2 for an AD
administrative review of two
companies: JBF RAK LLC (JBF) and Flex
Middle East FZE (Flex).3 In addition,
the Department received a timely
request for an AD review of itself from
JBF.4 On December 30, 2013, the
Department published a notice of
initiation of administrative review with
1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
To Request Administrative Review, 78 FR 65612,
65613 (November 1, 2013).
2 Petitioners are DuPont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi
Polyester Film, Inc., SKC, Inc., and Toray Plastics
(America), Inc.
3 See Petitioners’ letter, ‘‘Polyethylene
Terephthalate (PET) Film, Sheet, and Strip from
United Arab Emirates: Request for Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated December 2,
2013.
4 See JBF’s letter, ‘‘JBF RAK LLC/Request for A/
D Administrative Review: Polyethylene
Terephthalate (PET) Film, Sheet, and Strip from
United Arab Emirates,’’ dated November 29, 2013.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:37 Apr 22, 2014
Jkt 232001
ADs occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double ADs.
Rescission in Part
[FR Doc. 2014–09281 Filed 4–22–14; 8:45 am]
respect to Flex and JBF.5 On March 31,
2014, petitioners withdrew their request
for an AD administrative review of
Flex.6
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19
CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
Secretary will rescind an administrative
review, in whole or in part, if a party
that requested the review withdraws the
request within 90 days of the date of
publication of the notice of initiation of
the requested review. Petitioners’ March
31, 2014 withdrawal request was
submitted within the 90-day period and
thus is timely.7 Because Petitioners’
withdrawal of their requests for review
is timely and because no other party
requested a review of Flex, we are
rescinding this review with respect to
this company, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.213(d)(1). The request from
petitioners for an administrative review
of JBF has not been withdrawn. As such,
we are not rescinding the review with
respect to JBF.
Assessment
The Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
assess ADs on all appropriate entries.
Subject merchandise of Flex will be
assessed ADs at rates equal to the cash
deposit of estimated ADs required at the
time of entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption, in
accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department
intends to issue assessment instructions
to CBP 15 days after the date of
publication of this notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers for whom this review is
being rescinded, as of the publication
date of this notice, of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of ADs
prior to liquidation of the relevant
entries during this review period.
Failure to comply with this requirement
could result in the Secretary’s
presumption that reimbursement of the
5 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and
Requests for Revocation in Part, 78 FR 79392
(December 30, 2013).
6 See Petitioners’ letter ‘‘Withdrawal of Request
for Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of
Flex Middle East FZE,’’ dated March 31, 2014.
7 The 90th day fell on March 30, 2014. However,
because this day fell on a weekend, the actual due
date is the following business day, i.e., March 31,
2014. See Notice of Clarification: Application of
‘‘Next Business Day’’ Rule for Administrative
Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act
of 1930, as Amended, 70 FR 24533, 24533 (May 10,
2005).
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
Dated: April 17, 2014.
James Maeder,
Director, Office II, Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2014–09282 Filed 4–22–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–928, A–791–821, A–552–803]
Uncovered Innerspring Units From the
People’s Republic of China, South
Africa, and Socialist Republic of
Vietnam: Continuation of Antidumping
Duty Orders
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) and the International
Trade Commission (the ITC) determined
that revocation of the antidumping duty
(AD) orders on uncovered innerspring
units from the People’s Republic of
China (PRC), South Africa, and Socialist
Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) would
likely lead to continuation or recurrence
of dumping and material injury to an
industry in the United States. Therefore,
the Department is publishing a notice of
continuation of these AD orders.
DATES: Effective Date: April 23, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sandra Dreisonstok or Minoo Hatten,
AD/CVD Operations, Office I,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 78 / Wednesday, April 23, 2014 / Notices
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–0768 or (202) 482–1690,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 1, 2013, the Department
published the notice of initiation of the
first sunset reviews of the AD orders on
uncovered innerspring units from the
PRC, South Africa, and Vietnam,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).1 As
a result of its reviews, the Department
determined that revocation of the AD
orders on uncovered innerspring units
from the PRC, South Africa, and
Vietnam would likely lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping
and notified the ITC of the magnitude of
the margins likely to prevail should the
orders be revoked.2 On April 11, 2014,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act,
the ITC determined that revocation of
the AD orders on uncovered innerspring
units from the PRC, South Africa, and
Vietnam would likely lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the United
States within a reasonably foreseeable
time.3
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Scope of the Orders
The merchandise covered by these
orders is uncovered innerspring units
composed of a series of individual metal
springs joined together in sizes
corresponding to the sizes of adult
mattresses (e.g., twin, twin long, full,
full long, queen, California king, and
king) and units used in smaller
constructions, such as crib and youth
mattresses. All uncovered innerspring
units are included in this scope
regardless of width and length. Included
within this definition are innersprings
typically ranging from 30.5 inches to 76
inches in width and 68 inches to 84
inches in length. Innersprings for crib
mattresses typically range from 25
inches to 27 inches in width and 50
inches to 52 inches in length.
Uncovered innerspring units are
suitable for use as the innerspring
component in the manufacture of
innerspring mattresses, including
mattresses that incorporate a foam
encasement around the innerspring.
Pocketed and non-pocketed innerspring
1 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 78
FR 65614 (November 1, 2013).
2 See Uncovered Innerspring Units From the
People’s Republic of China, South Africa, and
Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of the
Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty
Orders, 79 FR 13277 (March 10, 2014).
3 See Uncovered Innerspring Units From China,
South Africa, and Vietnam, 79 FR 20230 (April 11,
2014).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:37 Apr 22, 2014
Jkt 232001
units are included in this definition.
Non-pocketed innersprings are typically
joined together with helical wire and
border rods. Non-pocketed innersprings
are included in this definition
regardless of whether they have border
rods attached to the perimeter of the
innerspring. Pocketed innersprings are
individual coils covered by a ‘‘pocket’’
or ‘‘sock’’ of a nonwoven synthetic
material or woven material and then
glued together in a linear fashion.
Uncovered innersprings are classified
under subheading 9404.29.9010 and
have also been classified under
subheadings 9404.10.0000,
7326.20.0070, 7320.20.5010, or
7320.90.5010 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).
On January 11, 2011, the Department
included HTSUS classification numbers
9404.29.9005 and 9404.29.9011 to the
customs case reference file, pursuant to
a request by U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP). On January 7, 2013,
the Department included the HTSUS
classification 7326.20.0071 number to
the customs case reference file, pursuant
to a request by CBP. The HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes
only; the written description of the
scope of this investigation is dispositive.
Continuation of the Orders
As a result of the determinations by
the Department and the ITC that
revocation of the AD orders would
likely lead to continuation or recurrence
of dumping and material injury to an
industry in the United States, pursuant
to section 751(d)(2) of the Act, the
Department hereby orders the
continuation of the antidumping orders
on uncovered innerspring units from the
PRC, South Africa, and Vietnam. CBP
will continue to collect AD cash
deposits at the rates in effect at the time
of entry for all imports of subject
merchandise. The effective date of the
continuation of the orders will be the
date of publication in the Federal
Register of this notice of continuation.
Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act,
the Department intends to initiate the
next five-year reviews of these orders
not later than 30 days prior to the fifth
anniversary of the effective date of
continuation.
These sunset reviews and this notice
are in accordance with section 751(c) of
the Act and published pursuant to
section 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(f)(4).
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22625
Dated: April 17, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014–09275 Filed 4–22–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–489–502]
Circular Welded Carbon Steel Pipe and
Tube Products From Turkey:
Preliminary Results of Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review; Calendar
Year 2012 and Intent To Rescind
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review, in Part
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
countervailing duty (CVD) order on
circular welded carbon steel pipe and
tube products from Turkey (steel pipe)
for the period of review (POR) of
January 1, 2012, through December 31,
2012. The review covers one producer/
exporter of subject merchandise that the
Department selected for individual
examination: Borusan Mannesmann
Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (BMB), and
Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S.
(Istikbal), (collectively, the Borusan
Companies). Additionally, this review
covers two firms that were not
individually examined: Erbosan Erciyas
Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (Erbosan
AS) and Erbosan Erciyas Pipe Industry
and Trade Co. Kayseri Free Zone Branch
(Erbosan FZB), (collectively Erbosan),
and Tosyali dis Ticaret A.S. (Tosyali)
and Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi
A.S. (Toscelik Profil), (collectively,
Toscelik). We preliminarily determine
that the Borusan Companies received
countervailable subsidies during the
POR but that the total net subsidy rate
is less than 0.5 percent ad valorem and,
therefore, de minimis. For purposes of
these preliminary results, we assigned
Erbosan and Toscelik, the non-selected
respondents, net subsidy rates of de
minimis and 0.83 percent ad valorem,
respectively. Interested parties are
invited to comment on these
preliminary results.
DATES: Effective Date: April 23, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jolanta Lawska, AD/CVD Operations,
Office III, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 78 (Wednesday, April 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22624-22625]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-09275]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-928, A-791-821, A-552-803]
Uncovered Innerspring Units From the People's Republic of China,
South Africa, and Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Continuation of
Antidumping Duty Orders
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) and the
International Trade Commission (the ITC) determined that revocation of
the antidumping duty (AD) orders on uncovered innerspring units from
the People's Republic of China (PRC), South Africa, and Socialist
Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam) would likely lead to continuation or
recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United
States. Therefore, the Department is publishing a notice of
continuation of these AD orders.
DATES: Effective Date: April 23, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandra Dreisonstok or Minoo Hatten,
AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW.,
[[Page 22625]]
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0768 or (202) 482-1690,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 1, 2013, the Department published the notice of
initiation of the first sunset reviews of the AD orders on uncovered
innerspring units from the PRC, South Africa, and Vietnam, pursuant to
section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).\1\ As a
result of its reviews, the Department determined that revocation of the
AD orders on uncovered innerspring units from the PRC, South Africa,
and Vietnam would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping
and notified the ITC of the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail
should the orders be revoked.\2\ On April 11, 2014, pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act, the ITC determined that revocation of the AD orders
on uncovered innerspring units from the PRC, South Africa, and Vietnam
would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to
an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable
time.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Review, 78 FR 65614
(November 1, 2013).
\2\ See Uncovered Innerspring Units From the People's Republic
of China, South Africa, and Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final
Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty
Orders, 79 FR 13277 (March 10, 2014).
\3\ See Uncovered Innerspring Units From China, South Africa,
and Vietnam, 79 FR 20230 (April 11, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Orders
The merchandise covered by these orders is uncovered innerspring
units composed of a series of individual metal springs joined together
in sizes corresponding to the sizes of adult mattresses (e.g., twin,
twin long, full, full long, queen, California king, and king) and units
used in smaller constructions, such as crib and youth mattresses. All
uncovered innerspring units are included in this scope regardless of
width and length. Included within this definition are innersprings
typically ranging from 30.5 inches to 76 inches in width and 68 inches
to 84 inches in length. Innersprings for crib mattresses typically
range from 25 inches to 27 inches in width and 50 inches to 52 inches
in length.
Uncovered innerspring units are suitable for use as the innerspring
component in the manufacture of innerspring mattresses, including
mattresses that incorporate a foam encasement around the innerspring.
Pocketed and non-pocketed innerspring units are included in this
definition. Non-pocketed innersprings are typically joined together
with helical wire and border rods. Non-pocketed innersprings are
included in this definition regardless of whether they have border rods
attached to the perimeter of the innerspring. Pocketed innersprings are
individual coils covered by a ``pocket'' or ``sock'' of a nonwoven
synthetic material or woven material and then glued together in a
linear fashion.
Uncovered innersprings are classified under subheading 9404.29.9010
and have also been classified under subheadings 9404.10.0000,
7326.20.0070, 7320.20.5010, or 7320.90.5010 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). On January 11, 2011, the
Department included HTSUS classification numbers 9404.29.9005 and
9404.29.9011 to the customs case reference file, pursuant to a request
by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). On January 7, 2013, the
Department included the HTSUS classification 7326.20.0071 number to the
customs case reference file, pursuant to a request by CBP. The HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes only; the
written description of the scope of this investigation is dispositive.
Continuation of the Orders
As a result of the determinations by the Department and the ITC
that revocation of the AD orders would likely lead to continuation or
recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United
States, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act, the Department hereby
orders the continuation of the antidumping orders on uncovered
innerspring units from the PRC, South Africa, and Vietnam. CBP will
continue to collect AD cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time
of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of
the continuation of the orders will be the date of publication in the
Federal Register of this notice of continuation. Pursuant to section
751(c)(2) of the Act, the Department intends to initiate the next five-
year reviews of these orders not later than 30 days prior to the fifth
anniversary of the effective date of continuation.
These sunset reviews and this notice are in accordance with section
751(c) of the Act and published pursuant to section 777(i)(1) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4).
Dated: April 17, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014-09275 Filed 4-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P