Certain Optoelectronic Devices for Fiber Optic Communications, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same; Commission Final Determination of Violation of Section 337; Issuance of Remedial Orders; Termination of Investigation, 22702-22703 [2014-09242]
Download as PDF
22702
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 78 / Wednesday, April 23, 2014 / Notices
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–860]
Certain Optoelectronic Devices for
Fiber Optic Communications,
Components Thereof, and Products
Containing the Same; Commission
Final Determination of Violation of
Section 337; Issuance of Remedial
Orders; Termination of Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined that there
is a violation of section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C.
1337) by respondents IPtronics A/S of
Roskilde, Denmark; IPtronics Inc. of
Menlo Park, California; FCI USA, LLC,
of Etters, Pennsylvania; FCI
Deutschland GmbH of Berlin, Germany;
FCI SA of Guyancourt, France; Mellanox
Technologies, Inc. of Sunnyvale,
California; and Mellanox Technologies
Ltd. of Yokneam, Israel (collectively,
‘‘Respondents’’) in the above-captioned
investigation. The Commission has
issued remedial orders directed to the
Respondents’ infringing products and
has terminated the investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3115. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
investigation was instituted on October
30, 2012, based upon a complaint filed
by Avago Technologies Fiber IP
(Singapore) Pte. Ltd. of Singapore;
Avago Technologies General IP
(Singapore) Pte. Ltd. of Singapore; and
Avago Technologies U.S. Inc. of San
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:37 Apr 22, 2014
Jkt 232001
Jose, California (collectively,
‘‘Complainants’’), alleging a violation of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the
importation, sale for importation, or sale
within the United States after
importation of certain optoelectronic
devices for fiber optic communications,
components thereof, and products
containing the same by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent Nos. 6,947,456 (‘‘the ’456
patent’’) and 5,596,595 (‘‘the ’595
patent’’). 77 FR 65713 (Oct. 30, 2012). In
addition to the private parties named as
respondents, the Commission named
the Office of Unfair Import
Investigations as a party in this
investigation.
The final Initial Determination (‘‘ID’’)
on violation was issued on December
13, 2013. The ALJ issued his
recommended determination on
remedy, the public interest and bonding
on the same day. The ALJ found that a
violation of section 337 has occurred in
the importation into the United States,
the sale for importation, or the sale
within the United States after
importation of certain optoelectronic
devices for fiber optic communications,
components thereof, and products
containing the same by reason of
infringement of certain claims of the
’595 patent. All the parties to this
investigation filed timely petitions for
review of various portions of the final
ID, as well as timely responses to the
petitions. The ALJ recommended that
the Commission issue a limited
exclusion order directed to
Respondents’ accused products that
infringe the ’595 patent. The ALJ also
recommended that the Commission
issue cease and desist orders against the
Mellanox and FCI respondents.
On January 15, 2014, Complainants
filed a post-RD statement on the public
interest pursuant to Commission Rule
201.50(a)(4). On the same day,
respondents Mellanox Technologies,
Inc. and Mellanox Technologies, Ltd.
also filed a submission pursuant to the
rule. No responses from the public were
received in response to the post-RD
Commission Notice issued on December
16, 2013. See Notice of Request for
Statements on the Public Interest (Dec.
16, 2013).
On February 12, 2014, the
Commission issued notice of its
determination to review the final ID in
part (‘‘the Commission Notice’’). 79 FR
9764–65 (Feb. 20, 2014). In the Notice,
the Commission also set a schedule for
the filing of written submissions on the
issues under review, including certain
questions posed by the Commission,
and on remedy, the public interest, and
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
bonding. The Commission also invited
briefing from the parties, interested
government agencies, and other
interested parties with respect to the
issues of remedy, the public interest,
and bonding. The parties have briefed,
with initial and reply submissions, the
issues under review and the issues of
remedy, the public interest, and
bonding. No other submissions were
received regarding remedy, the public
interest, or bonding.
Having examined the record in this
investigation, including the parties’
submissions filed in response to the
Commission’s Notice, the Commission
has determined as follows:
(I) With respect to the ’595 patent:
(a) To affirm the ALJ’s claim
construction of the limitation ‘‘currentspreading layer’’ and infringement and
domestic industry (technical prong)
determinations relating to that
limitation with certain modifications;
and
(b) to affirm the ALJ’s finding that the
Complainants met the economic prong
under 19.
U.S.C. 1337(a)(3)(C), and thus not
reach the issue of whether the economic
prong was met under 19 U.S.C.
1337(a)(3)(A) and (B).
(II) With respect to the ’456 patent:
(a) To affirm the ALJ’s infringement
and domestic industry (technical prong)
determinations with certain
modifications in his rationale; and
(b) to affirm the ALJ’s finding that the
Complainants met the economic prong
under 19.
U.S.C. 1337(a)(3)(C), and thus not
reach the issue of whether the economic
prong was met under 19 U.S.C.
1337(a)(3)(A) and (B).
The Commission has determined that
the appropriate relief in this
investigation includes:
(1) A limited exclusion order
prohibiting the unlicensed entry of
certain optoelectronic devices for fiber
optic communications, components
thereof, and products containing the
same covered by one or more of claims
14 and 19 of U.S. Patent No. 5,596,595
and that are manufactured abroad by or
on behalf of, or imported by or on behalf
of, respondents IPtronics A/S; IPtronics
Inc.; FCI SA; FCI Deutschland GmbH;
FCI USA, LLC; Mellanox Technologies,
Ltd.; and Mellanox Technologies, Inc.;
and (2) cease and desist orders
prohibiting importing, selling,
marketing, advertising, distributing,
transferring (except for exportation), and
soliciting U.S. agents or distributors for,
optoelectronic devices for fiber optic
communications, components thereof,
and products containing the same
covered by one or more of claims 14 and
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 78 / Wednesday, April 23, 2014 / Notices
19 of U.S. Patent No. 5,596,595 and that
are manufactured abroad by or on behalf
of, or imported by or on behalf of,
respondents FCI USA, LLC and
Mellanox Technologies, Inc.
The Commission has further
determined that the public interest
factors enumerated in section 337(d)(l)
and (f)(1) (19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(l), (f)(1)) do
not preclude issuance of the limited
exclusion order. Finally, the
Commission determined that
Respondents are required to post a bond
in the amount of 3 percent of the
entered value of the products covered
by the exclusion order and cease and
desist orders during the period of
Presidential review. The Commission’s
orders were delivered to the President
and the United States Trade
Representative on the day of their
issuance.
The Commission has therefore
terminated this investigation. The
authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and Part 210
of the Commission’s Rules of Practice
and Procedure (19 CFR Part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: April 17, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014–09242 Filed 4–22–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Job Corps: Final Finding of No
Significant Impact Tongue Point Job
Corps Center Medical/Dental Building
Located at 37573 Old Highway 30 in
Astoria, Oregon
Employment and Training
Administration (ETA), Labor.
ACTION: Final Finding of No Significant
Impact Tongue Point Job Corps Center
Medical/Dental Building located at
37573 Old Highway 30 in Astoria,
Oregon.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations (40
CFR part 1500–08) implementing
procedural provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the
Department of Labor, ETA, in
accordance with 29 CFR 11.11(d), gives
final notice of the proposed
construction of the Medical/Dental
Building at the Tongue Point Job Corps
Center, and that this project will not
have a significant adverse impact on the
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:37 Apr 22, 2014
Jkt 232001
environment. Public scoping was
initiated with a notice in the Daily
Astorian in Astoria, Oregon on July 25,
2013. The scoping period extended for
30 days, ending on August 25, 2013. No
public responses were received. No
changes to the text of the environmental
assessment (EA) have been made.
Implementation of the selected
alternative will not have significant
impacts on the human environment.
The determination is sustained by the
analysis in the EA, agency consultation,
the inclusion and consideration of
public review, and the capability of
mitigations to reduce or avoid impacts.
Any adverse environmental impacts that
could occur are no more than minor in
intensity, duration and context and lessthan-significant. As described in the EA,
there are no highly uncertain or
controversial impacts, unique or
unknown risks, significant cumulative
effects or elements of precedence. There
are no previous, planned, or
implemented actions, which in
combination with the selected
alternative would have significant
effects on the human environment.
Requirements of NEPA have been
satisfied and preparation of an
Environmental Impact Statement is not
required.
DATES: Effective Date: These findings are
effective as of November 20, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William A. Dakshaw, Department of
Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Room N–4460, Washington, DC 20210
(202) 693–2867 (this is not a toll free
number).
Eric M. Seleznow,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Employment
and Training, Labor.
[FR Doc. 2014–09197 Filed 4–22–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FT–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Job Corps: Final Finding of No
Significant Impact Shreveport Job
Corps Center Redevelopment Located
at 2815 Lillian Street, Shreveport,
Louisiana
Employment and Training
Administration (ETA), Labor.
ACTION: Final finding of no significant
impact Shreveport Job Corps Center
redevelopment located at 2815 Lillian
Street, Shreveport, Louisiana.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations (40
CFR part 1500–08) implementing
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
procedural provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the
Department of Labor, ETA, in
accordance with 29 CFR 11.11(d), gives
final notice of the proposed
redevelopment at the Shreveport Job
Corps Center, and that this project will
not have a significant adverse impact on
the environment. Public scoping was
initiated with a notice in the Times in
Shreveport, Louisiana on August 17,
2013. The scoping period extended for
30 days, ending on September 16, 2013.
No public responses were received. No
changes to the text of the environmental
assessment (EA) have been made.
Implementation of the selected
alternative will not have significant
impacts on the human environment.
The determination is sustained by the
analysis in the EA, agency consultation,
the inclusion and consideration of
public review, and the capability of
mitigations to reduce or avoid impacts.
Any adverse environmental impacts that
could occur are no more than minor in
intensity, duration and context and lessthan-significant. As described in the EA,
there are no highly uncertain or
controversial impacts, unique or
unknown risks, significant cumulative
effects or elements of precedence. There
are no previous, planned, or
implemented actions, which in
combination with the selected
alternative would have significant
effects on the human environment.
Requirements of NEPA have been
satisfied and preparation of an
Environmental Impact Statement is not
required.
DATES: Effective Date: These findings are
effective as of November 20, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William A Dakshaw, Department of
Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Room N–4460, Washington, DC 20210
(202) 693–2867 (this is not a toll-free
number).
Eric M. Seleznow,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Employment
and Training, Labor.
Employment and Training
Administration
SUMMARY:
22703
[FR Doc. 2014–09196 Filed 4–22–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FT–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Job Corps: Final Finding of No
Significant Impact Detroit Job Corps
Center Phase II Located at 11801
Woodrow Wilson Street, Detroit,
Michigan
Employment and Training
Administration (ETA), Labor.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 78 (Wednesday, April 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22702-22703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-09242]
[[Page 22702]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-860]
Certain Optoelectronic Devices for Fiber Optic Communications,
Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same; Commission Final
Determination of Violation of Section 337; Issuance of Remedial Orders;
Termination of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined that there is a violation of section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337) by respondents
IPtronics A/S of Roskilde, Denmark; IPtronics Inc. of Menlo Park,
California; FCI USA, LLC, of Etters, Pennsylvania; FCI Deutschland GmbH
of Berlin, Germany; FCI SA of Guyancourt, France; Mellanox
Technologies, Inc. of Sunnyvale, California; and Mellanox Technologies
Ltd. of Yokneam, Israel (collectively, ``Respondents'') in the above-
captioned investigation. The Commission has issued remedial orders
directed to the Respondents' infringing products and has terminated the
investigation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3115. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202)
205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This investigation was instituted on October
30, 2012, based upon a complaint filed by Avago Technologies Fiber IP
(Singapore) Pte. Ltd. of Singapore; Avago Technologies General IP
(Singapore) Pte. Ltd. of Singapore; and Avago Technologies U.S. Inc. of
San Jose, California (collectively, ``Complainants''), alleging a
violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, (19
U.S.C. 1337) in the importation, sale for importation, or sale within
the United States after importation of certain optoelectronic devices
for fiber optic communications, components thereof, and products
containing the same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent Nos. 6,947,456 (``the '456 patent'') and 5,596,595 (``the '595
patent''). 77 FR 65713 (Oct. 30, 2012). In addition to the private
parties named as respondents, the Commission named the Office of Unfair
Import Investigations as a party in this investigation.
The final Initial Determination (``ID'') on violation was issued on
December 13, 2013. The ALJ issued his recommended determination on
remedy, the public interest and bonding on the same day. The ALJ found
that a violation of section 337 has occurred in the importation into
the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the
United States after importation of certain optoelectronic devices for
fiber optic communications, components thereof, and products containing
the same by reason of infringement of certain claims of the '595
patent. All the parties to this investigation filed timely petitions
for review of various portions of the final ID, as well as timely
responses to the petitions. The ALJ recommended that the Commission
issue a limited exclusion order directed to Respondents' accused
products that infringe the '595 patent. The ALJ also recommended that
the Commission issue cease and desist orders against the Mellanox and
FCI respondents.
On January 15, 2014, Complainants filed a post-RD statement on the
public interest pursuant to Commission Rule 201.50(a)(4). On the same
day, respondents Mellanox Technologies, Inc. and Mellanox Technologies,
Ltd. also filed a submission pursuant to the rule. No responses from
the public were received in response to the post-RD Commission Notice
issued on December 16, 2013. See Notice of Request for Statements on
the Public Interest (Dec. 16, 2013).
On February 12, 2014, the Commission issued notice of its
determination to review the final ID in part (``the Commission
Notice''). 79 FR 9764-65 (Feb. 20, 2014). In the Notice, the Commission
also set a schedule for the filing of written submissions on the issues
under review, including certain questions posed by the Commission, and
on remedy, the public interest, and bonding. The Commission also
invited briefing from the parties, interested government agencies, and
other interested parties with respect to the issues of remedy, the
public interest, and bonding. The parties have briefed, with initial
and reply submissions, the issues under review and the issues of
remedy, the public interest, and bonding. No other submissions were
received regarding remedy, the public interest, or bonding.
Having examined the record in this investigation, including the
parties' submissions filed in response to the Commission's Notice, the
Commission has determined as follows:
(I) With respect to the '595 patent:
(a) To affirm the ALJ's claim construction of the limitation
``current-spreading layer'' and infringement and domestic industry
(technical prong) determinations relating to that limitation with
certain modifications; and
(b) to affirm the ALJ's finding that the Complainants met the
economic prong under 19.
U.S.C. 1337(a)(3)(C), and thus not reach the issue of whether the
economic prong was met under 19 U.S.C. 1337(a)(3)(A) and (B).
(II) With respect to the '456 patent:
(a) To affirm the ALJ's infringement and domestic industry
(technical prong) determinations with certain modifications in his
rationale; and
(b) to affirm the ALJ's finding that the Complainants met the
economic prong under 19.
U.S.C. 1337(a)(3)(C), and thus not reach the issue of whether the
economic prong was met under 19 U.S.C. 1337(a)(3)(A) and (B).
The Commission has determined that the appropriate relief in this
investigation includes:
(1) A limited exclusion order prohibiting the unlicensed entry of
certain optoelectronic devices for fiber optic communications,
components thereof, and products containing the same covered by one or
more of claims 14 and 19 of U.S. Patent No. 5,596,595 and that are
manufactured abroad by or on behalf of, or imported by or on behalf of,
respondents IPtronics A/S; IPtronics Inc.; FCI SA; FCI Deutschland
GmbH; FCI USA, LLC; Mellanox Technologies, Ltd.; and Mellanox
Technologies, Inc.; and (2) cease and desist orders prohibiting
importing, selling, marketing, advertising, distributing, transferring
(except for exportation), and soliciting U.S. agents or distributors
for, optoelectronic devices for fiber optic communications, components
thereof, and products containing the same covered by one or more of
claims 14 and
[[Page 22703]]
19 of U.S. Patent No. 5,596,595 and that are manufactured abroad by or
on behalf of, or imported by or on behalf of, respondents FCI USA, LLC
and Mellanox Technologies, Inc.
The Commission has further determined that the public interest
factors enumerated in section 337(d)(l) and (f)(1) (19 U.S.C.
1337(d)(l), (f)(1)) do not preclude issuance of the limited exclusion
order. Finally, the Commission determined that Respondents are required
to post a bond in the amount of 3 percent of the entered value of the
products covered by the exclusion order and cease and desist orders
during the period of Presidential review. The Commission's orders were
delivered to the President and the United States Trade Representative
on the day of their issuance.
The Commission has therefore terminated this investigation. The
authority for the Commission's determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and Part
210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR Part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: April 17, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014-09242 Filed 4-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P