Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Information for Self-Certification Under FAQ 6 of the U.S.-European Union and U.S.-Switzerland Safe Harbor Frameworks, 20169-20171 [2014-08197]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 70 / Friday, April 11, 2014 / Notices
would like the Forest Service to
consider and analyze?
• Is there any information about the
project area, which you believe is
important in the context of the proposed
activities that you would like the Forest
Service to consider?
• What specifically are the potential
effects of this proposal that you are
particularly concerned about? For
example, rather than simply stating that
you would like a change in a proposed
activity or that you would not like an
activity to take place, it is most helpful
to understand why you desire this.
What are your underlying concerns with
an activity or action; what are the effects
from the activity that concern you? It is
important that reviewers provide their
comments at such times and in such
manner that they are useful to the
agency’s preparation of the
environmental impact statement.
Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the
comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer’s concerns and
contentions.
Comments received in response to
this solicitation, including names and
addresses of those who comment, will
be part of the public record for this
proposed action. Comments submitted
anonymously will be accepted and
considered, however.
Dated: April 3, 2014.
Meg Mitchell,
Forest Supervisor, Willamette National
Forest.
[FR Doc. 2014–07968 Filed 4–10–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
CHEMICAL SAFETY AND HAZARD
INVESTIGATION BOARD
Sunshine Act Meeting
April 22, 2014, 5:30
p.m.–8:30 p.m. CDT.
PLACE: Southside Community Center
205 Tokio Road, West, TX 76691.
STATUS: Open to the public.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The
Chemical Safety and Hazard
Investigation Board (CSB) will convene
a public meeting on April 22, 2014,
starting a 5:30 p.m. at the Southside
Community Center, 205 Tokio Rd, West,
TX 76691. At the public meeting, the
board will hear preliminary findings
from the CSB’s investigation team into
the April 17, 2013, fire and massive
explosion which occurred at the West
Fertilizer Company/Adair Grain facility
in West, Texas, that killed 14 people
and injuring injured more than 250
neighboring residents and emergency
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
TIME AND DATE:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:55 Apr 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
responders. Twelve of the fatalities were
volunteer firefighters and two were
members of the public.
The sudden blast at the facility led to
the widespread damage and the
destruction of over 150 buildings
including an apartment complex, three
schools, a nursing home, and a hospital
in the surrounding community.
This public meeting is intended to
provide the residents of West, TX and
other members of the public with
information into how this incident
occurred and how similar future
incidents can be prevented or mitigated.
The CSB has invited several
stakeholders in the emergency response
community to provide their insights
into this incident.
Following the staff presentation and
expert panel presentation the Board will
hear comments from the public. All staff
presentations are preliminary and are
intended solely to allow the Board to
consider in a public forum the issues
and factors involved in this case. No
factual analyses, conclusions, or
findings presented by staff should be
considered final.
Additional Information
The meeting is free and open to the
public. If you require a translator or
interpreter, please notify the individual
listed below as the ‘‘Contact Person for
Further Information,’’ at least five
business days prior to the meeting.
The CSB is an independent federal
agency charged with investigating
accidents and hazards that result, or
may result, in the catastrophic release of
extremely hazardous substances. The
agency’s Board Members are appointed
by the President and confirmed by the
Senate. CSB investigations look into all
aspects of chemical accidents and
hazards, including physical causes such
as equipment failure as well as
inadequacies in regulations, industry
standards, and safety management
systems.
Public Comment
Members of the public are invited to
make brief statements to the Board at
the conclusion of the staff presentation.
The time provided for public statements
will depend upon the number of people
who wish to speak. Speakers should
assume that their presentations will be
limited to five minutes or less, but
commenters may submit written
statements for the record.
Contact Person for Further Information
Hillary J. Cohen, Communications
Manager, hillary.cohen@csb.gov or (202)
446–8094. General information about
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20169
the CSB can be found on the agency
Web site at: www.csb.gov.
Dated: April 7, 2014.
Rafael Moure-Eraso,
Chairperson.
[FR Doc. 2014–08325 Filed 4–9–14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6350–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Information for
Self-Certification Under FAQ 6 of the
U.S.-European Union and U.S.Switzerland Safe Harbor Frameworks
International Trade
Administration, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before June 10, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6616,
14th and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at JJessup@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to: David Ritchie or Nick Enz,
U.S. Department of Commerce,
International Trade Administration,
U.S.-EU & U.S.-Swiss Safe Harbor
Programs, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW., Room 20007, Washington, DC
20230; (or via the Internet at
safe.harbor@trade.gov); tel. 202–482–
4936 or 202–482–1512.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Abstract
The Safe Harbor self-certification form
is used by U.S. organizations in order to
certify their compliance with one or
both of the Safe Harbor Frameworks.
The form has been revised to provide
additional guidance and the option to
select Swiss Safe Harbor in the drop
down menu.
The European Union Directive on
Data Protection (EU Directive) and the
Swiss Federal Act on Data Protection
E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM
11APN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
20170
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 70 / Friday, April 11, 2014 / Notices
(Swiss FADP) generally restrict transfers
of personal data to countries that are not
deemed to provide ‘‘adequate’’ privacy
protection. In order to ensure continued
flows of personal data to the United
States from the EU and Switzerland, the
U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC)
developed similar, but separate
arrangements with the European
Commission and the Federal Data
Protection and Information
Commissioner of Switzerland (Swiss
FDPIC) (i.e., the U.S.-EU Safe Harbor
Framework and U.S.-Swiss Safe Harbor
Framework) to provide eligible U.S.
organizations with a streamlined means
of complying with the relevant
requirements of the EU Directive and
the Swiss FADP.
On July 26, 2000, the European
Commission issued a decision—in
accordance with Article 25.6 of the EU
Directive—finding that for all of the
activities within the scope of the EU
Directive, the Safe Harbor Privacy
Principles, implemented in accordance
with the guidance provided by the
Frequently Asked Questions issued by
the DOC are considered to ensure an
‘‘adequate’’ level of protection for
personal data transferred from the EU to
organizations established in the United
States. The U.S.-EU Safe Harbor
Framework, which the European
Economic Area (EEA) also has
recognized as providing adequate data
protection, became operational on
November 1, 2000. The U.S.-Swiss Safe
Harbor Framework, which was
developed later, became operational in
2009. The complete set of U.S.-EU and
U.S.-Swiss Safe Harbor documents and
additional guidance materials may be
found at https://export.gov/safeharbor.
For purposes of the Safe Harbor
Frameworks, ‘‘personal data’’ and
‘‘personal information’’ are data about
an identified or identifiable individual
that are within the scope of the EU
Directive, received by a U.S.
organization from the EU/EEA and/or
Switzerland, and recorded in any form.
‘‘Personal data’’ is defined in the EU
Directive as ‘‘. . . any information
relating to an identified or identifiable
natural person’’. The scope of the EU
Directive extends with a few exceptions
to all ‘‘processing of data’’, which is
defined as ‘‘. . . any operation or set of
operations which is performed upon
personal data, whether or not by
automatic means, such as collection,
recording, organization, storage,
adaptation or alteration, retrieval,
consultation, use, disclosure by
transmission, dissemination or
otherwise making available, alignment
or combination, blocking, erasure or
destruction’’.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:55 Apr 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
The decision by an organization to
self-certify its compliance with one or
both of the Safe Harbor Frameworks is
entirely voluntary; however, once made,
the organization must comply with the
requirements of the relevant Safe Harbor
Framework and publicly declare that it
does so. To be assured of Safe Harbor
benefits, an organization must reaffirm
its self-certification annually, via Form
ITA–4149P, to the DOC in accordance
with the requirements specified in the
Framework(s) and guidance provided by
the DOC. An organization’s selfcertification and the appearance of the
organization on the relevant Safe Harbor
List(s) pursuant to the self-certification,
constitutes an enforceable
representation to the DOC and the
public that it adheres to a privacy policy
that complies with the relevant Safe
Harbor Framework(s). Any public
misrepresentation concerning an
organization’s participation in the Safe
Harbor or compliance with one or both
of the Safe Harbor Frameworks may be
actionable by the Federal Trade
Commission (FTC) or other relevant
government body (e.g. the Department
of Transportation).
The Safe Harbor Frameworks provide
a number of important benefits,
especially predictability and continuity,
to U.S. organizations that receive
personal data for processing from the
EU/EEA and/or Switzerland. All 28 EU
Member States, and by extension all
EEA Member States, are bound by the
European Commission’s finding of
‘‘adequacy’’. Organizations that have
self-certified, appear on the relevant
Safe Harbor List(s), and have not
allowed their certification status to
lapse are presumed to provide
‘‘adequate’’ data protection in
accordance with the EU Directive and/
or the Swiss FADP and therefore are not
required to provide further
documentation to European officials on
this point. The Safe Harbor eliminates
the need for prior approval to begin data
transfers or makes approval from the
appropriate national data protection
authority automatic. The Safe Harbor
Frameworks offer a simple and costeffective means of complying with the
relevant requirements of the EU
Directive and Swiss FADP, which
should particularly benefit small and
medium enterprises.
The DOC maintains and updates
regularly public lists of U.S.
organizations that have self-certified
and provides guidance on substantive
requirements associated with selfcertification. The Lists, referred to as the
Safe Harbor Lists (i.e. U.S.-EU Safe
Harbor List and U.S.-Swiss Safe Harbor
List) are necessary to make the Safe
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Harbor Frameworks operational, and
were a key demand of the European
Commission and the Swiss FDPIC in
agreeing that compliance with the Safe
Harbor Frameworks provide ‘‘adequate’’
privacy protection. The Safe Harbor
Lists, which are made available to the
public on the DOC’s Safe Harbor Web
site, are used not only by European
citizens and organizations to determine
whether a U.S. organization is presumed
to provide ‘‘adequate’’ data protection,
but also by U.S. and European
authorities to determine whether an
organization has self-certified its
compliance with one or both Safe
Harbor Frameworks, especially when a
complaint has been lodged against that
U.S. organization.
II. Method of Collection
The self-certification form is available
via the Internet on the DOC Safe Harbor
Web site: https://export.gov/safeharbor/.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0625–0239.
Form Number(s): ITA–4149P.
Type of Review: Regular submission
(revision of a currently approved
information collection).
Affected Public: Business or for-profit
organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
780.
Estimated Time per Response: 40
minutes completing and making initial
self-certification submission online via
the DOC Safe Harbor Web site.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 520.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $174,200 (certification fees).
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM
11APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 70 / Friday, April 11, 2014 / Notices
Dated: April 8, 2014.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014–08197 Filed 4–10–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–013]
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire
Rod From the People’s Republic of
China: Postponement of Preliminary
Determination in the Countervailing
Duty Investigation
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rebecca Trainor at (202) 482–4007 or
Irene Darzenta Tzafolias at (202) 482–
0922, AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On February 20, 2014, the Department
of Commerce (the Department) initiated
the countervailing duty (CVD)
investigation of carbon and certain alloy
steel wire rod (steel wire rod) from the
People’s Republic of China (PRC).1
Currently, the preliminary
determination is due no later than April
28, 2014.2
Postponement of Due Date for the
Preliminary Determination
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Section 703(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act), requires the
Department to issue the preliminary
determination in a CVD investigation
within 65 days after the date on which
the Department initiated the
investigation. However, the Department
may postpone making the preliminary
determination until no later than 130
days after the date on which the
administering authority initiated the
1 See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod
from the People’s Republic of China: Initiation of
Countervailing Duty Investigation, 79 FR 11085
(February 27, 2014) (Initiation Notice).
2 The statutory deadline for the preliminary
determination is Saturday, April 26, 2014. When
the statutory deadline falls on a weekend, it is the
Department’s practice to issue the determination on
the next business day, which in this case would be
Monday, April 28, 2014. See Notice of Clarification:
Application of ‘‘Next Business Day’’ Rule for
Administrative Determination Deadlines Pursuant
to the Tariff Act of 1930, as Amended, 70 FR 24533
(May 10, 2005).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:55 Apr 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
investigation if, among other reasons,
the petitioner makes a timely request for
an extension pursuant to section
703(c)(1)(A) of the Act.
On March 31, 2014, the petitioner,
Nucor Corporation (Nucor), timely
requested that the Department postpone
its preliminary CVD determination to
130 days from the initiation date.3
Pursuant to 703(c)(1)(A) of the Act
and because the Department does not
find any compelling reason to deny the
request, we are extending the due date
for the preliminary determination to no
later than 130 days after the date on
which this investigation was initiated,
or June 30, 2014.
This notice is issued and published
pursuant to section 703(c)(2) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1).
Dated: April 7, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014–08188 Filed 4–10–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Meeting of the Manufacturing Council
International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of an open meeting.
AGENCY:
The Manufacturing Council
will hold a meeting on Tuesday, April
29, 2014, to discuss and deliberate on
proposed recommendations addressing
workforce development best practices;
strategies to address misconceptions of
manufacturing careers; innovation,
research and development in
manufacturing; and manufacturing
energy policy. The Council will also
hear an update from its subcommittee
on tax policy and export growth.
Additionally, the Council will receive
updates from representatives of the U.S.
government on the manufacturing
initiatives taking place across federal
agencies. A final agenda will be
available on the Council’s Web site one
week prior to the meeting. The Council
advises the Secretary of Commerce on
government programs and policies that
affect U.S. manufacturing and provide a
means of ensuring regular contact
between the U.S. Government and the
manufacturing sector.
SUMMARY:
3 See 19 CFR 351.205(e) and Letter from Nucor,
‘‘Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from the
People’s Republic of China: Request for Extension
of Preliminary Determination’’ (March 31, 2014).
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20171
April 29, 2014, 10 a.m. Eastern
Daylight Time (EDT).
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230. Due to building security, all
attendees must pre-register. This
meeting will be physically accessible to
people with disabilities. Seating is
limited and will be on a first come, first
served basis. Pre-registration and
requests for sign language interpretation
or other auxiliary aids should be
submitted no later than Monday, April
21, 2014, to Elizabeth Emanuel, the
Manufacturing Council, Room 4043,
1401 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230, telephone 202–
482–1369, elizabeth.emanuel@
trade.gov. Last minute requests will be
accepted, but may be impossible to fill.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Emanuel, the Manufacturing
Council, Room 4043, 1401 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230,
telephone: 202–482–1369, email:
elizabeth.emanuel@trade.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A limited
amount of time, from 12:45 p.m.–1 p.m.,
will be made available for pertinent
brief oral comments from members of
the public attending the meeting. To
accommodate as many speakers as
possible, the time for public comments
will be limited to 5 minutes per person.
Individuals wishing to reserve speaking
time during the meeting must contact
Ms. Emanuel and submit a brief
statement of the general nature of the
comments, as well as the name and
address of the proposed speaker, by 5
p.m. EDT on Monday, April 21, 2014. If
the number of registrants requesting to
make statements is greater than can be
reasonably accommodated during the
meeting, the International Trade
Administration may conduct a lottery to
determine the speakers. Speakers are
requested to bring at least 30 copies of
their oral comments for distribution to
the members of the Manufacturing
Council and to the public at the
meeting. Any member of the public may
submit pertinent written comments
concerning the Manufacturing Council’s
affairs at any time before or after the
meeting. Comments may be submitted
to Elizabeth Emanuel, the
Manufacturing Council, Room 4043,
1401 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230, telephone: 202–
482–1369, email: elizabeth.emanuel@
trade.gov. To be considered during the
meeting, written comments must be
received by 5 p.m. EDT on Monday,
April 21, 2014, to ensure transmission
to the Manufacturing Council prior to
the meeting. Comments received after
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM
11APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 70 (Friday, April 11, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20169-20171]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-08197]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Information for
Self-Certification Under FAQ 6 of the U.S.-European Union and U.S.-
Switzerland Safe Harbor Frameworks
AGENCY: International Trade Administration, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before June 10, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th
and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet
at JJessup@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection instrument and instructions should
be directed to: David Ritchie or Nick Enz, U.S. Department of Commerce,
International Trade Administration, U.S.-EU & U.S.-Swiss Safe Harbor
Programs, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Room 20007, Washington, DC
20230; (or via the Internet at safe.harbor@trade.gov); tel. 202-482-
4936 or 202-482-1512.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The Safe Harbor self-certification form is used by U.S.
organizations in order to certify their compliance with one or both of
the Safe Harbor Frameworks. The form has been revised to provide
additional guidance and the option to select Swiss Safe Harbor in the
drop down menu.
The European Union Directive on Data Protection (EU Directive) and
the Swiss Federal Act on Data Protection
[[Page 20170]]
(Swiss FADP) generally restrict transfers of personal data to countries
that are not deemed to provide ``adequate'' privacy protection. In
order to ensure continued flows of personal data to the United States
from the EU and Switzerland, the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC)
developed similar, but separate arrangements with the European
Commission and the Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner
of Switzerland (Swiss FDPIC) (i.e., the U.S.-EU Safe Harbor Framework
and U.S.-Swiss Safe Harbor Framework) to provide eligible U.S.
organizations with a streamlined means of complying with the relevant
requirements of the EU Directive and the Swiss FADP.
On July 26, 2000, the European Commission issued a decision--in
accordance with Article 25.6 of the EU Directive--finding that for all
of the activities within the scope of the EU Directive, the Safe Harbor
Privacy Principles, implemented in accordance with the guidance
provided by the Frequently Asked Questions issued by the DOC are
considered to ensure an ``adequate'' level of protection for personal
data transferred from the EU to organizations established in the United
States. The U.S.-EU Safe Harbor Framework, which the European Economic
Area (EEA) also has recognized as providing adequate data protection,
became operational on November 1, 2000. The U.S.-Swiss Safe Harbor
Framework, which was developed later, became operational in 2009. The
complete set of U.S.-EU and U.S.-Swiss Safe Harbor documents and
additional guidance materials may be found at https://export.gov/safeharbor.
For purposes of the Safe Harbor Frameworks, ``personal data'' and
``personal information'' are data about an identified or identifiable
individual that are within the scope of the EU Directive, received by a
U.S. organization from the EU/EEA and/or Switzerland, and recorded in
any form. ``Personal data'' is defined in the EU Directive as ``. . .
any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural
person''. The scope of the EU Directive extends with a few exceptions
to all ``processing of data'', which is defined as ``. . . any
operation or set of operations which is performed upon personal data,
whether or not by automatic means, such as collection, recording,
organization, storage, adaptation or alteration, retrieval,
consultation, use, disclosure by transmission, dissemination or
otherwise making available, alignment or combination, blocking, erasure
or destruction''.
The decision by an organization to self-certify its compliance with
one or both of the Safe Harbor Frameworks is entirely voluntary;
however, once made, the organization must comply with the requirements
of the relevant Safe Harbor Framework and publicly declare that it does
so. To be assured of Safe Harbor benefits, an organization must
reaffirm its self-certification annually, via Form ITA-4149P, to the
DOC in accordance with the requirements specified in the Framework(s)
and guidance provided by the DOC. An organization's self-certification
and the appearance of the organization on the relevant Safe Harbor
List(s) pursuant to the self-certification, constitutes an enforceable
representation to the DOC and the public that it adheres to a privacy
policy that complies with the relevant Safe Harbor Framework(s). Any
public misrepresentation concerning an organization's participation in
the Safe Harbor or compliance with one or both of the Safe Harbor
Frameworks may be actionable by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) or
other relevant government body (e.g. the Department of Transportation).
The Safe Harbor Frameworks provide a number of important benefits,
especially predictability and continuity, to U.S. organizations that
receive personal data for processing from the EU/EEA and/or
Switzerland. All 28 EU Member States, and by extension all EEA Member
States, are bound by the European Commission's finding of ``adequacy''.
Organizations that have self-certified, appear on the relevant Safe
Harbor List(s), and have not allowed their certification status to
lapse are presumed to provide ``adequate'' data protection in
accordance with the EU Directive and/or the Swiss FADP and therefore
are not required to provide further documentation to European officials
on this point. The Safe Harbor eliminates the need for prior approval
to begin data transfers or makes approval from the appropriate national
data protection authority automatic. The Safe Harbor Frameworks offer a
simple and cost-effective means of complying with the relevant
requirements of the EU Directive and Swiss FADP, which should
particularly benefit small and medium enterprises.
The DOC maintains and updates regularly public lists of U.S.
organizations that have self-certified and provides guidance on
substantive requirements associated with self-certification. The Lists,
referred to as the Safe Harbor Lists (i.e. U.S.-EU Safe Harbor List and
U.S.-Swiss Safe Harbor List) are necessary to make the Safe Harbor
Frameworks operational, and were a key demand of the European
Commission and the Swiss FDPIC in agreeing that compliance with the
Safe Harbor Frameworks provide ``adequate'' privacy protection. The
Safe Harbor Lists, which are made available to the public on the DOC's
Safe Harbor Web site, are used not only by European citizens and
organizations to determine whether a U.S. organization is presumed to
provide ``adequate'' data protection, but also by U.S. and European
authorities to determine whether an organization has self-certified its
compliance with one or both Safe Harbor Frameworks, especially when a
complaint has been lodged against that U.S. organization.
II. Method of Collection
The self-certification form is available via the Internet on the
DOC Safe Harbor Web site: https://export.gov/safeharbor/.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0625-0239.
Form Number(s): ITA-4149P.
Type of Review: Regular submission (revision of a currently
approved information collection).
Affected Public: Business or for-profit organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 780.
Estimated Time per Response: 40 minutes completing and making
initial self-certification submission online via the DOC Safe Harbor
Web site.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 520.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public: $174,200 (certification
fees).
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information
collection; they also will become a matter of public record.
[[Page 20171]]
Dated: April 8, 2014.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-08197 Filed 4-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-P