Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Extending a Pilot Program Related to Rule 128, Entitled “Clearly Erroneous Executions For NYSE Equities”, 18592-18593 [2014-07286]
Download as PDF
18592
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 63 / Wednesday, April 2, 2014 / Notices
Accordingly, the Commission,
pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,9
designates May 28, 2014, as the date by
which the Commission shall either
approve or disapprove the proposed
rule change (File No. SR–FINRA–2013–
039).
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.10
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–07279 Filed 4–1–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–71821; File No. SR–NYSE–
2014–17]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change Extending a
Pilot Program Related to Rule 128,
Entitled ‘‘Clearly Erroneous
Executions For NYSE Equities’’
March 27, 2014.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on March
26, 2014, New York Stock Exchange
LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to extend a
pilot program related to Rule 128,
entitled ‘‘Clearly Erroneous Executions
For NYSE Equities.’’ The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Web site at www.nyse.com,
at the principal office of the Exchange,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
9 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
CFR 200.30–3(a)(57).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
10 17
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:01 Apr 01, 2014
Jkt 232001
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this filing is to extend
the effectiveness of the Exchange’s
current rule applicable to Clearly
Erroneous Executions. Portions of Rule
128, explained in further detail below,
are currently operating as a pilot
program set to expire on April 8, 2014.4
The Exchange proposes to extend the
pilot program to coincide with the pilot
period for the Plan to Address
Extraordinary Market Volatility
Pursuant to Rule 608 of Regulation NMS
under the Act (the ‘‘Limit Up-Limit
Down Plan’’ or the ‘‘Plan’’), including
any extensions to the pilot period for
the Plan.5
On September 10, 2010, the
Commission approved, on a pilot basis,
changes to Rule 128 to provide for
uniform treatment: (1) Of clearly
erroneous execution reviews in multistock events involving twenty or more
securities; and (2) in the event
transactions occur that result in the
issuance of an individual stock trading
pause by the primary listing market and
subsequent transactions that occur
before the trading pause is in effect on
the Exchange.6 The Exchange also
adopted additional changes to Rule 128
that reduced the ability of the Exchange
to deviate from the objective standards
set forth in Rule 128,7 and in 2013,
adopted a provision designed to address
the operation of the Plan.8
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70519
(September 26, 2013), 78 FR 60969 (October 2,
2013) (SR–NYSE–2013–65).
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67091
(May 31, 2012), 77 FR 33498 (June 6, 2012) (the
‘‘Limit Up-Limit Down Release’’).
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62886
(Sept. 10, 2010), 75 FR 56613 (Sept. 16, 2010) (SR–
NYSE–2010–47).
7 Id.
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68804
(Feb. 1, 2013), 78 FR 8677 (Feb. 6, 2013) (SR–
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Exchange believes the benefits to
market participants from the more
objective clearly erroneous executions
rule should continue on a pilot basis to
coincide with the operation of the Limit
Up-Limit Down Plan. The Exchange
believes that continuing the pilot will
protect against any unanticipated
consequences. Thus, the Exchange
believes that the protections of the
Clearly Erroneous Rule should continue
while the industry gains further
experience operating the Plan.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules
and regulations thereunder that are
applicable to a national securities
exchange, and, in particular, with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.9
In particular, the proposal is consistent
with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,10
because it would promote just and
equitable principles of trade, remove
impediments to, and perfect the
mechanism of, a free and open market
and a national market system. Although
the Limit Up-Limit Down Plan is
operational, the Exchange believes that
maintaining the pilot will help to
protect against unanticipated
consequences. Thus, the Exchange
believes that the protections of the
Clearly Erroneous Rule should continue
while the industry gains further
experience operating the Plan. The
Exchange also believes that the pilot
program promotes just and equitable
principles of trade in that it promotes
transparency and uniformity across
markets concerning review of
transactions as clearly erroneous. Thus,
the Exchange believes that the extension
of the pilot would help assure that the
determination of whether a clearly
erroneous trade has occurred will be
based on clear and objective criteria,
and that the resolution of the incident
will occur promptly through a
transparent process. The proposed rule
change would also help assure
consistent results in handling erroneous
trades across the U.S. markets, thus
furthering fair and orderly markets, the
protection of investors and the public
interest. Based on the foregoing, the
Exchange believes the benefits to market
participants from the more objective
clearly erroneous executions rule
should continue on a pilot basis to
NYSE–2013–11); Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 67091 (May 31, 2012), 77 FR 33498 (June 6,
2012) (the ‘‘Limit Up-Limit Down Release’’); see
also Exchange Rule 128(i).
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
E:\FR\FM\02APN1.SGM
02APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 63 / Wednesday, April 2, 2014 / Notices
coincide with the operation of the Limit
Up-Limit Down Plan.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change implicates any
competitive issues. To the contrary, as
noted above, the Exchange believes
FINRA and other national securities
exchanges are also filing similar
proposals, and thus, that the proposal
will help to ensure consistency across
market centers.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the proposed rule change
does not (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the
proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 11 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii)
thereunder.12
The Exchange has asked the
Commission to waive the 30-day
operative delay so that the proposal may
become operative immediately upon
filing. The Commission believes that
waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, as it
will allow the clearly erroneous pilot
program to continue uninterrupted
while the industry gains further
experience operating under the Limit
Up-Limit Down Plan, and avoid any
investor confusion that could result
from a temporary interruption in the
pilot program. For this reason, the
Commission designates the proposed
rule change to be operative upon
filing.13
11 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). As required under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the
Commission with written notice of its intent to file
the proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and the text of the proposed rule
change, at least five business days prior to the date
of filing of the proposed rule change, or such
shorter time as designated by the Commission.
13 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has also
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
12 17
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:01 Apr 01, 2014
Jkt 232001
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSE–2014–17 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2014–17. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18593
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–NYSE–
2014–17 and should be submitted on or
before April 23, 2014.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.14
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–07286 Filed 4–1–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–71822; File No. SR–Phlx–
2014–19]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change Regarding
Extension of FLEX Option No Minimum
Value Size Pilot Program
March 27, 2014.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on March 20,
2014, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC
(‘‘Phlx’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing with the
Commission a proposal to amend Phlx
Rule 1079 (FLEX Index, Equity and
Currency Options) to extend a pilot
program that eliminates minimum value
sizes for FLEX index options and FLEX
equity options (together known as
‘‘FLEX Options’’).3
14 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 In addition to FLEX Options, FLEX currency
options are also traded on the Exchange. These
flexible index, equity, and currency options provide
investors the ability to customize basic option
features including size, expiration date, exercise
style, and certain exercise prices; and may have
expiration dates within five years. See Rule 1079.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\02APN1.SGM
Continued
02APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 63 (Wednesday, April 2, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18592-18593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-07286]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-71821; File No. SR-NYSE-2014-17]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
Extending a Pilot Program Related to Rule 128, Entitled ``Clearly
Erroneous Executions For NYSE Equities''
March 27, 2014.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on March 26, 2014, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or
the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I
and II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to extend a pilot program related to Rule
128, entitled ``Clearly Erroneous Executions For NYSE Equities.'' The
text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web
site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this filing is to extend the effectiveness of the
Exchange's current rule applicable to Clearly Erroneous Executions.
Portions of Rule 128, explained in further detail below, are currently
operating as a pilot program set to expire on April 8, 2014.\4\ The
Exchange proposes to extend the pilot program to coincide with the
pilot period for the Plan to Address Extraordinary Market Volatility
Pursuant to Rule 608 of Regulation NMS under the Act (the ``Limit Up-
Limit Down Plan'' or the ``Plan''), including any extensions to the
pilot period for the Plan.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70519 (September 26,
2013), 78 FR 60969 (October 2, 2013) (SR-NYSE-2013-65).
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67091 (May 31,
2012), 77 FR 33498 (June 6, 2012) (the ``Limit Up-Limit Down
Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On September 10, 2010, the Commission approved, on a pilot basis,
changes to Rule 128 to provide for uniform treatment: (1) Of clearly
erroneous execution reviews in multi-stock events involving twenty or
more securities; and (2) in the event transactions occur that result in
the issuance of an individual stock trading pause by the primary
listing market and subsequent transactions that occur before the
trading pause is in effect on the Exchange.\6\ The Exchange also
adopted additional changes to Rule 128 that reduced the ability of the
Exchange to deviate from the objective standards set forth in Rule
128,\7\ and in 2013, adopted a provision designed to address the
operation of the Plan.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62886 (Sept. 10,
2010), 75 FR 56613 (Sept. 16, 2010) (SR-NYSE-2010-47).
\7\ Id.
\8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68804 (Feb. 1,
2013), 78 FR 8677 (Feb. 6, 2013) (SR-NYSE-2013-11); Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 67091 (May 31, 2012), 77 FR 33498 (June 6,
2012) (the ``Limit Up-Limit Down Release''); see also Exchange Rule
128(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the benefits to market participants from the
more objective clearly erroneous executions rule should continue on a
pilot basis to coincide with the operation of the Limit Up-Limit Down
Plan. The Exchange believes that continuing the pilot will protect
against any unanticipated consequences. Thus, the Exchange believes
that the protections of the Clearly Erroneous Rule should continue
while the industry gains further experience operating the Plan.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder that
are applicable to a national securities exchange, and, in particular,
with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\9\ In particular, the
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\10\ because it
would promote just and equitable principles of trade, remove
impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of, a free and open market
and a national market system. Although the Limit Up-Limit Down Plan is
operational, the Exchange believes that maintaining the pilot will help
to protect against unanticipated consequences. Thus, the Exchange
believes that the protections of the Clearly Erroneous Rule should
continue while the industry gains further experience operating the
Plan. The Exchange also believes that the pilot program promotes just
and equitable principles of trade in that it promotes transparency and
uniformity across markets concerning review of transactions as clearly
erroneous. Thus, the Exchange believes that the extension of the pilot
would help assure that the determination of whether a clearly erroneous
trade has occurred will be based on clear and objective criteria, and
that the resolution of the incident will occur promptly through a
transparent process. The proposed rule change would also help assure
consistent results in handling erroneous trades across the U.S.
markets, thus furthering fair and orderly markets, the protection of
investors and the public interest. Based on the foregoing, the Exchange
believes the benefits to market participants from the more objective
clearly erroneous executions rule should continue on a pilot basis to
[[Page 18593]]
coincide with the operation of the Limit Up-Limit Down Plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change
implicates any competitive issues. To the contrary, as noted above, the
Exchange believes FINRA and other national securities exchanges are
also filing similar proposals, and thus, that the proposal will help to
ensure consistency across market centers.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the proposed rule change does not (i) significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii). As required under Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the Commission with written
notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a
brief description and the text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative
delay so that the proposal may become operative immediately upon
filing. The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay
is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest,
as it will allow the clearly erroneous pilot program to continue
uninterrupted while the industry gains further experience operating
under the Limit Up-Limit Down Plan, and avoid any investor confusion
that could result from a temporary interruption in the pilot program.
For this reason, the Commission designates the proposed rule change to
be operative upon filing.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2014-17 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2014-17. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2014-17 and should be
submitted on or before April 23, 2014.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-07286 Filed 4-1-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P