Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 16825-16827 [2014-06677]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 58 / Wednesday, March 26, 2014 / Notices Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of March, 2014. Del Min Amy Chen, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2014–06685 Filed 3–25–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–83,129] sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES International Paper Company, Courtland Alabama Paper Mill, Printing & Communications Papers Division, a Subsidiary of International Paper Company, Including On-Site Leased Worker From Manpower and Western Express, Courtland, Alabama; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on February 6, 2014, applicable to workers of International Paper Company, Courtland Alabama Paper Mill, Printing & Communications Papers Division, a subsidiary of International Paper Company, including on-site leased workers from Manpower, Courtland, Alabama. The workers are engaged in activities related to the production of coated and uncoated freesheet paper, and are not separately identifiable by article produced. The notice was published in the Federal Register on February 24, 2014 (79 FR 10189). At the request from the State of Tennessee, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. New information from the company shows that workers leased from Western Express were employed on-site at the Courtland, Alabama location of International Paper Company, Courtland Alabama Paper Mill, Printing & Communications Papers Division, a subsidiary of International Paper Company. The Department has determined that these workers were sufficiently under the control of International Paper Company, Courtland Alabama Paper Mill, Printing & Communications Papers Division, a subsidiary of International Paper Company to be considered leased workers. The intent of the Department’s certification is to include all workers of the subject firm who were adversely VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:43 Mar 25, 2014 Jkt 232001 affected by increased imports of coated and uncoated freesheet paper. Based on these findings, the Department is amending this certification to include workers leased from Western Express working on-site at the Courtland, Alabama location of the subject firm. The amended notice applicable to TA–W–83,129 is hereby issued as follows: All workers from International Paper Company, Alabama Paper Mill, Printing & Communication Papers Division, a subsidiary of International Paper Company, including on-site leased workers from Manpower and Western Express, Courtland, Alabama, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after October 10, 2012 through February 6, 2016, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on date of certification through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. Signed at Washington, DC this 13th day of March 2014. Del Min Amy Chen, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2014–06682 Filed 3–25–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers by (TA–W) number issued during the period of March 3, 2014 through March 7, 2014. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied: (1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) the sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased absolutely; and PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 16825 (3) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) imports of articles or services like or directly competitive with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have increased; (B) imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are directly incorporated, have increased; (C) imports of articles directly incorporating one or more component parts produced outside the United States that are like or directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more component parts produced by such firm have increased; (D) imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have increased; and (4) the increase in imports contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the sales or production of such firm; or II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied: (1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) there has been a shift by the workers’ firm to a foreign country in the production of articles or supply of services like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; (B) there has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the workers’ firm of articles/services that are like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; and (3) the shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in the public agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) the public agency has acquired from a foreign country services like or E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM 26MRN1 16826 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 58 / Wednesday, March 26, 2014 / Notices directly competitive with services which are supplied by such agency; and (3) the acquisition of services contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must be met. (1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) the workers’ firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or production is related to the article or service that was the basis for such certification; and (3) either— (A) the workers’ firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers’ firm; or (B) a loss of business by the workers’ firm with the firm described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met. (1) the workers’ firm is publicly identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in— (A) an affirmative determination of serious injury or threat thereof under section 202(b)(1); (B) an affirmative determination of market disruption or threat thereof under section 421(b)(1); or (C) an affirmative final determination of material injury or threat thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); (2) the petition is filed during the 1year period beginning on the date on which— (A) a summary of the report submitted to the President by the International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or (B) notice of an affirmative determination described in subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and (3) the workers have become totally or partially separated from the workers’ firm within— (A) the 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or (B) notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding the 1-year period described in paragraph (2). Affirmative Determinations For Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 83,099 .......... 83,238 .......... 83,334D ........ Niagara Ceramics ............................................................................... Keywell LLC ........................................................................................ IBM Corporation, 200 MM Manufacturing, Micro Electronics, D&M, STG. J. Kinderman and Sons, Inc., T/A Brite Star Manufacturing Company. Convergys Customer Management Group, Inc .................................. Buffalo, NY ................................... Chicago, IL ................................... Essex Junction, VT ...................... September 19, 2012. November 21, 2012. December 24, 2012. Philadelphia, PA ........................... August 20, 2013. Brownsville, TX ............................ December 31, 2012 83,355 .......... 83,356 .......... The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 83,131 .......... Boston Scientific, Gemini Staffing Consultants, Advantage Resourcing, etc. Boston Scientific, Gemini Staffing Consultants, Advantage Resourcing, etc. The Longaberger Company, Longaberger Pottery Works ................. IBM Corporation, Technical Operations, Systems and Technology Group (STG), Software. IBM Corporation, Division 47 Global Procurement, Integrated Supply, Systems and Tech, Software. IBM Corporation, 200 MM Enablement, 200 MM Engineering, Micro Electronics, D&M, STG. Arden Hills, MN ............................ September 30, 2012. Marlborough, MA .......................... September 30, 2012. Buffalo, NY ................................... Essex Junction, VT ...................... November 7, 2012. December 24, 2012. Essex Junction, VT ...................... December 24, 2012. Essex Junction, VT ...................... December 24, 2012 83,131A ........ 83,208 .......... 83,334 .......... 83,334A ........ sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 83,334E ........ Negative Determinations For Worker Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:43 Mar 25, 2014 Jkt 232001 criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified. The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs(a)(2)(A) PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not been met. E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM 26MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 58 / Wednesday, March 26, 2014 / Notices TA–W No. Subject firm 83,218 .......... 83,334B ........ The Boeing Company, Information Technology Operations Center .. IBM Corporation, Power System Technology, Enterprise Systems, Development. IBM Corporation, Game Chip Design, OEM Microprocessors, Enterprise Systems, D&M, STG. Kaleidoscope Industries, Inc ............................................................... 83,334C ........ 83,345 .......... I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of March 3, 2014 through March 7, 2014. These determinations are available on the Department’s Web site tradeact/taa/taa_ search_cfm under the searchable listing of determinations or by calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance toll free at 888–365–6822. Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of March 2014. Hope D. Kinglock, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2014–06677 Filed 3–25–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration [TA–W–83,058] sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Sysco Denver LLC, A Subsidiary of Sysco Corporation, Information Technology (It) Department, Denver, Colorado; Notice of Negative Determination on Reconsideration On November 27, 2013, the Department of Labor issued an Affirmative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration for the workers and former workers of Sysco Denver LLC, a subsidiary of Sysco Corporation, Information Technology (IT) Department, Denver, Colorado (Sysco Denver-IT Department). The Department’s Notice of determination was published in the Federal Register on December 10, 2013 (78 FR 74162). The Sysco Denver-IT Department worker group is engaged in activities related to the supply of information technology (IT) services. The Sysco Denver-IT Department is separately identifiable from other groups within Sysco Denver LLC, Denver, Colorado. Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c), reconsideration may be granted under the following circumstances: (1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered that the determination complained of was erroneous; (2) If it appears that the determination complained of was based on a mistake VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:43 Mar 25, 2014 Jkt 232001 Location Frm 00074 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Impact date Annapolis Junction, MD Essex Junction, VT Essex Junction, VT Howell, MI in the determination of facts not previously considered; or (3) If in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the decision. The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination based on the findings that a significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm or appropriate subdivision have not become totally or partially separated, nor are they threatened with such separation. Significant number or proportion of the workers means that: (a) In most cases the total or partial separations, or both, in a firm or appropriate subdivision thereof, are the equivalent to a total unemployment of five percent (5 percent) of the workers or 50 workers, whichever is less; or (b) At least three workers in a firm (or appropriate subdivision thereof) with a work force of fewer than 50 workers would ordinarily have to be affected. 29 CFR 90.2 In the case at hand, fewer than three workers were totally or partially separated or threatened with such separation. The request for reconsideration states that the two workers separated at Sysco Denver-IT Department were part of a larger worker group (those supplying IT services at various Sysco Corporation facilities) and that IT functions are being outsourced to India. The request also referenced a certification applicable to another worker group (TA–W–82,383; Sysco Boston LLC, Plympton, Massachusetts). The reconsideration investigation revealed that the workers of Sysco Denver-IT Department were not part of a larger IT worker group nor did they report to any other firm locations. During the reconsideration investigation, the subject firm confirmed that the subject workers did not report to nor were they part of the Sysco Boston LLC, Plymptom, Massachusetts worker group. Consequently, the Department determined that an amendment to the TA—W–82,383 certification is not appropriate. Further, the reconsideration investigation revealed that the workers of Sysco Denver-IT Department reported to PO 00000 16827 individuals within the Sysco Denver Operating Company and received wages as employees of Sysco Denver LLC. Sysco Corporation did not employ these individuals nor did Sysco Corporate control or direct their daily activities. The request for reconsideration implies that since individuals and pairs of workers constitute a worker group, the subject workers constitute a worker group. 29 CFR 90.2 defines a group of workers as three or more workers in a firm or appropriate subdivision thereof. The petitioning worker group in TA–W– 82,383 met the requirements of a group. Information obtained during the reconsideration investigation confirmed that with respect to Section 222(a) and Section 222(b) of the Act, Criterion (1) has not been met because a significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have not become totally or partially separated, nor are they threatened to become totally or partially separated. A careful review of previouslysubmitted information and information obtained during the reconsideration investigation revealed that the worker group consisting of Sysco Denver LLC, a subsidiary of Sysco Corporation, Information Technology (IT) Department, Denver, Colorado, did not meet this requirement. The workers’ firm has not been publically identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in an affirmative finding of serious injury, market disruption, or material injury, or threat thereof. Therefore, after careful review of the request for reconsideration, the Department determines that 29 CFR 90.18(c) has not been met. Conclusion After careful review of previouslysubmitted information and information obtained during the reconsideration investigation, I affirm the notice of negative determination of eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance for workers and former workers of Sysco Denver LLC, a subsidiary of Sysco Corporation, Information Technology (IT) Department, Denver, Colorado, in E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM 26MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 58 (Wednesday, March 26, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16825-16827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-06677]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of 
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment 
assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of 
March 3, 2014 through March 7, 2014.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of 
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to 
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility 
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
    I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied:
    (1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in such 
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are 
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
    (2) the sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased 
absolutely; and
    (3) One of the following must be satisfied:
    (A) imports of articles or services like or directly competitive 
with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have 
increased;
    (B) imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles 
into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are 
directly incorporated, have increased;
    (C) imports of articles directly incorporating one or more 
component parts produced outside the United States that are like or 
directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more 
component parts produced by such firm have increased;
    (D) imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles 
which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have 
increased; and
    (4) the increase in imports contributed importantly to such 
workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the 
sales or production of such firm; or
    II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied:
    (1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in such 
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are 
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
    (2) One of the following must be satisfied:
    (A) there has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign 
country in the production of articles or supply of services like or 
directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm;
    (B) there has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the 
workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly 
competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and
    (3) the shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers' 
separation or threat of separation.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely 
affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued 
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each 
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must 
be met.
    (1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in the public 
agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to 
become totally or partially separated;
    (2) the public agency has acquired from a foreign country services 
like or

[[Page 16826]]

directly competitive with services which are supplied by such agency; 
and
    (3) the acquisition of services contributed importantly to such 
workers' separation or threat of separation.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely 
affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued 
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each 
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must 
be met.
    (1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in the 
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are 
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
    (2) the workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a 
firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of 
eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or 
production is related to the article or service that was the basis for 
such certification; and
    (3) either--
    (A) the workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it 
supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 
20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or
    (B) a loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described 
in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or 
threat of separation.
    In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely 
affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade 
Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply 
for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility 
requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met.
    (1) the workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the 
International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an 
investigation resulting in--
    (A) an affirmative determination of serious injury or threat 
thereof under section 202(b)(1);
    (B) an affirmative determination of market disruption or threat 
thereof under section 421(b)(1); or
    (C) an affirmative final determination of material injury or threat 
thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
    (2) the petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the 
date on which--
    (A) a summary of the report submitted to the President by the 
International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to 
the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is 
published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or
    (B) notice of an affirmative determination described in 
subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and
    (3) the workers have become totally or partially separated from the 
workers' firm within--
    (A) the 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or
    (B) notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding 
the 1-year period described in paragraph (2).

Affirmative Determinations For Worker Adjustment Assistance

    The following certifications have been issued. The date following 
the company name and location of each determination references the 
impact date for all workers of such determination.
    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been 
met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        TA-W No.                  Subject firm                Location                    Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
83,099..................  Niagara Ceramics...........  Buffalo, NY...........  September 19, 2012.
83,238..................  Keywell LLC................  Chicago, IL...........  November 21, 2012.
83,334D.................  IBM Corporation, 200 MM      Essex Junction, VT....  December 24, 2012.
                           Manufacturing, Micro
                           Electronics, D&M, STG.
83,355..................  J. Kinderman and Sons,       Philadelphia, PA......  August 20, 2013.
                           Inc., T/A Brite Star
                           Manufacturing Company.
83,356..................  Convergys Customer           Brownsville, TX.......  December 31, 2012
                           Management Group, Inc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of 
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act 
have been met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        TA-W No.                  Subject firm                Location                    Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
83,131..................  Boston Scientific, Gemini    Arden Hills, MN.......  September 30, 2012.
                           Staffing Consultants,
                           Advantage Resourcing, etc.
83,131A.................  Boston Scientific, Gemini    Marlborough, MA.......  September 30, 2012.
                           Staffing Consultants,
                           Advantage Resourcing, etc.
83,208..................  The Longaberger Company,     Buffalo, NY...........  November 7, 2012.
                           Longaberger Pottery Works.
83,334..................  IBM Corporation, Technical   Essex Junction, VT....  December 24, 2012.
                           Operations, Systems and
                           Technology Group (STG),
                           Software.
83,334A.................  IBM Corporation, Division    Essex Junction, VT....  December 24, 2012.
                           47 Global Procurement,
                           Integrated Supply, Systems
                           and Tech, Software.
83,334E.................  IBM Corporation, 200 MM      Essex Junction, VT....  December 24, 2012
                           Enablement, 200 MM
                           Engineering, Micro
                           Electronics, D&M, STG.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Negative Determinations For Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the 
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met 
for the reasons specified.
    The investigation revealed that the criteria under 
paragraphs(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in 
production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not 
been met.

[[Page 16827]]



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        TA-W No.                  Subject firm                Location                    Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
83,218..................  The Boeing Company,          Annapolis Junction, MD  .................................
                           Information Technology
                           Operations Center.
83,334B.................  IBM Corporation, Power       Essex Junction, VT      .................................
                           System Technology,
                           Enterprise Systems,
                           Development.
83,334C.................  IBM Corporation, Game Chip   Essex Junction, VT      .................................
                           Design, OEM
                           Microprocessors,
                           Enterprise Systems, D&M,
                           STG.
83,345..................  Kaleidoscope Industries,     Howell, MI              .................................
                           Inc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued 
during the period of March 3, 2014 through March 7, 2014. These 
determinations are available on the Department's Web site tradeact/taa/
taa--search--cfm under the searchable listing of determinations or by 
calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance toll free at 888-365-
6822.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of March 2014.
Hope D. Kinglock,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2014-06677 Filed 3-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P