Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 16825-16827 [2014-06677]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 58 / Wednesday, March 26, 2014 / Notices
Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of
March, 2014.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2014–06685 Filed 3–25–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–83,129]
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
International Paper Company,
Courtland Alabama Paper Mill, Printing
& Communications Papers Division, a
Subsidiary of International Paper
Company, Including On-Site Leased
Worker From Manpower and Western
Express, Courtland, Alabama;
Amended Certification Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’),
19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor
issued a Certification of Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance on February 6, 2014,
applicable to workers of International
Paper Company, Courtland Alabama
Paper Mill, Printing & Communications
Papers Division, a subsidiary of
International Paper Company, including
on-site leased workers from Manpower,
Courtland, Alabama. The workers are
engaged in activities related to the
production of coated and uncoated
freesheet paper, and are not separately
identifiable by article produced. The
notice was published in the Federal
Register on February 24, 2014 (79 FR
10189).
At the request from the State of
Tennessee, the Department reviewed the
certification for workers of the subject
firm. New information from the
company shows that workers leased
from Western Express were employed
on-site at the Courtland, Alabama
location of International Paper
Company, Courtland Alabama Paper
Mill, Printing & Communications Papers
Division, a subsidiary of International
Paper Company. The Department has
determined that these workers were
sufficiently under the control of
International Paper Company, Courtland
Alabama Paper Mill, Printing &
Communications Papers Division, a
subsidiary of International Paper
Company to be considered leased
workers.
The intent of the Department’s
certification is to include all workers of
the subject firm who were adversely
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Mar 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
affected by increased imports of coated
and uncoated freesheet paper.
Based on these findings, the
Department is amending this
certification to include workers leased
from Western Express working on-site at
the Courtland, Alabama location of the
subject firm.
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–83,129 is hereby issued as
follows:
All workers from International Paper
Company, Alabama Paper Mill, Printing &
Communication Papers Division, a subsidiary
of International Paper Company, including
on-site leased workers from Manpower and
Western Express, Courtland, Alabama, who
became totally or partially separated from
employment on or after October 10, 2012
through February 6, 2016, and all workers in
the group threatened with total or partial
separation from employment on date of
certification through two years from the date
of certification, are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of
Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.
Signed at Washington, DC this 13th day of
March 2014.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2014–06682 Filed 3–25–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19
U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers by (TA–W) number issued
during the period of March 3, 2014
through March 7, 2014.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the
following must be satisfied:
(1) a significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) the sales or production, or both, of
such firm have decreased absolutely;
and
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16825
(3) One of the following must be
satisfied:
(A) imports of articles or services like
or directly competitive with articles
produced or services supplied by such
firm have increased;
(B) imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles into which one
or more component parts produced by
such firm are directly incorporated,
have increased;
(C) imports of articles directly
incorporating one or more component
parts produced outside the United
States that are like or directly
competitive with imports of articles
incorporating one or more component
parts produced by such firm have
increased;
(D) imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are
produced directly using services
supplied by such firm, have increased;
and
(4) the increase in imports contributed
importantly to such workers’ separation
or threat of separation and to the decline
in the sales or production of such firm;
or
II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the
following must be satisfied:
(1) a significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) One of the following must be
satisfied:
(A) there has been a shift by the
workers’ firm to a foreign country in the
production of articles or supply of
services like or directly competitive
with those produced/supplied by the
workers’ firm;
(B) there has been an acquisition from
a foreign country by the workers’ firm
of articles/services that are like or
directly competitive with those
produced/supplied by the workers’ firm;
and
(3) the shift/acquisition contributed
importantly to the workers’ separation
or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in public agencies and
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(b) of the Act must be met.
(1) a significant number or proportion
of the workers in the public agency have
become totally or partially separated, or
are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
(2) the public agency has acquired
from a foreign country services like or
E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM
26MRN1
16826
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 58 / Wednesday, March 26, 2014 / Notices
directly competitive with services
which are supplied by such agency; and
(3) the acquisition of services
contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected secondary workers of a firm and
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(c) of the Act must be met.
(1) a significant number or proportion
of the workers in the workers’ firm have
become totally or partially separated, or
are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
(2) the workers’ firm is a Supplier or
Downstream Producer to a firm that
employed a group of workers who
received a certification of eligibility
under Section 222(a) of the Act, and
such supply or production is related to
the article or service that was the basis
for such certification; and
(3) either—
(A) the workers’ firm is a supplier and
the component parts it supplied to the
firm described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the
production or sales of the workers’ firm;
or
(B) a loss of business by the workers’
firm with the firm described in
paragraph (2) contributed importantly to
the workers’ separation or threat of
separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in firms identified by
the International Trade Commission and
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section 222(f)
of the Act must be met.
(1) the workers’ firm is publicly
identified by name by the International
Trade Commission as a member of a
domestic industry in an investigation
resulting in—
(A) an affirmative determination of
serious injury or threat thereof under
section 202(b)(1);
(B) an affirmative determination of
market disruption or threat thereof
under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) an affirmative final determination
of material injury or threat thereof under
section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) the petition is filed during the 1year period beginning on the date on
which—
(A) a summary of the report submitted
to the President by the International
Trade Commission under section
202(f)(1) with respect to the affirmative
determination described in paragraph
(1)(A) is published in the Federal
Register under section 202(f)(3); or
(B) notice of an affirmative
determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the
Federal Register; and
(3) the workers have become totally or
partially separated from the workers’
firm within—
(A) the 1-year period described in
paragraph (2); or
(B) notwithstanding section 223(b)(1),
the 1-year period preceding the 1-year
period described in paragraph (2).
Affirmative Determinations For Worker
Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the
Trade Act have been met.
TA–W No.
Subject firm
Location
Impact date
83,099 ..........
83,238 ..........
83,334D ........
Niagara Ceramics ...............................................................................
Keywell LLC ........................................................................................
IBM Corporation, 200 MM Manufacturing, Micro Electronics, D&M,
STG.
J. Kinderman and Sons, Inc., T/A Brite Star Manufacturing Company.
Convergys Customer Management Group, Inc ..................................
Buffalo, NY ...................................
Chicago, IL ...................................
Essex Junction, VT ......................
September 19, 2012.
November 21, 2012.
December 24, 2012.
Philadelphia, PA ...........................
August 20, 2013.
Brownsville, TX ............................
December 31, 2012
83,355 ..........
83,356 ..........
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or
services) of the Trade Act have been
met.
TA–W No.
Subject firm
Location
Impact date
83,131 ..........
Boston Scientific, Gemini Staffing Consultants, Advantage
Resourcing, etc.
Boston Scientific, Gemini Staffing Consultants, Advantage
Resourcing, etc.
The Longaberger Company, Longaberger Pottery Works .................
IBM Corporation, Technical Operations, Systems and Technology
Group (STG), Software.
IBM Corporation, Division 47 Global Procurement, Integrated Supply, Systems and Tech, Software.
IBM Corporation, 200 MM Enablement, 200 MM Engineering, Micro
Electronics, D&M, STG.
Arden Hills, MN ............................
September 30, 2012.
Marlborough, MA ..........................
September 30, 2012.
Buffalo, NY ...................................
Essex Junction, VT ......................
November 7, 2012.
December 24, 2012.
Essex Junction, VT ......................
December 24, 2012.
Essex Junction, VT ......................
December 24, 2012
83,131A ........
83,208 ..........
83,334 ..........
83,334A ........
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
83,334E ........
Negative Determinations For Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the eligibility
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Mar 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
criteria for worker adjustment assistance
have not been met for the reasons
specified.
The investigation revealed that the
criteria under paragraphs(a)(2)(A)
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift
in production or services to a foreign
country) of section 222 have not been
met.
E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM
26MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 58 / Wednesday, March 26, 2014 / Notices
TA–W No.
Subject firm
83,218 ..........
83,334B ........
The Boeing Company, Information Technology Operations Center ..
IBM Corporation, Power System Technology, Enterprise Systems,
Development.
IBM Corporation, Game Chip Design, OEM Microprocessors, Enterprise Systems, D&M, STG.
Kaleidoscope Industries, Inc ...............................................................
83,334C ........
83,345 ..........
I hereby certify that the
aforementioned determinations were
issued during the period of March 3,
2014 through March 7, 2014. These
determinations are available on the
Department’s Web site tradeact/taa/taa_
search_cfm under the searchable listing
of determinations or by calling the
Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance
toll free at 888–365–6822.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of
March 2014.
Hope D. Kinglock,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2014–06677 Filed 3–25–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–83,058]
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Sysco Denver LLC, A Subsidiary of
Sysco Corporation, Information
Technology (It) Department, Denver,
Colorado; Notice of Negative
Determination on Reconsideration
On November 27, 2013, the
Department of Labor issued an
Affirmative Determination Regarding
Application for Reconsideration for the
workers and former workers of Sysco
Denver LLC, a subsidiary of Sysco
Corporation, Information Technology
(IT) Department, Denver, Colorado
(Sysco Denver-IT Department). The
Department’s Notice of determination
was published in the Federal Register
on December 10, 2013 (78 FR 74162).
The Sysco Denver-IT Department
worker group is engaged in activities
related to the supply of information
technology (IT) services. The Sysco
Denver-IT Department is separately
identifiable from other groups within
Sysco Denver LLC, Denver, Colorado.
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c),
reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts
not previously considered that the
determination complained of was
erroneous;
(2) If it appears that the determination
complained of was based on a mistake
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:43 Mar 25, 2014
Jkt 232001
Location
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Impact date
Annapolis Junction, MD
Essex Junction, VT
Essex Junction, VT
Howell, MI
in the determination of facts not
previously considered; or
(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying
Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of
the law justified reconsideration of the
decision.
The initial investigation resulted in a
negative determination based on the
findings that a significant number or
proportion of the workers in such
workers’ firm or appropriate subdivision
have not become totally or partially
separated, nor are they threatened with
such separation.
Significant number or proportion of
the workers means that: (a) In most
cases the total or partial separations, or
both, in a firm or appropriate
subdivision thereof, are the equivalent
to a total unemployment of five percent
(5 percent) of the workers or 50 workers,
whichever is less; or (b) At least three
workers in a firm (or appropriate
subdivision thereof) with a work force
of fewer than 50 workers would
ordinarily have to be affected.
29 CFR 90.2
In the case at hand, fewer than three
workers were totally or partially
separated or threatened with such
separation.
The request for reconsideration states
that the two workers separated at Sysco
Denver-IT Department were part of a
larger worker group (those supplying IT
services at various Sysco Corporation
facilities) and that IT functions are being
outsourced to India. The request also
referenced a certification applicable to
another worker group (TA–W–82,383;
Sysco Boston LLC, Plympton,
Massachusetts).
The reconsideration investigation
revealed that the workers of Sysco
Denver-IT Department were not part of
a larger IT worker group nor did they
report to any other firm locations.
During the reconsideration
investigation, the subject firm confirmed
that the subject workers did not report
to nor were they part of the Sysco
Boston LLC, Plymptom, Massachusetts
worker group. Consequently, the
Department determined that an
amendment to the TA—W–82,383
certification is not appropriate. Further,
the reconsideration investigation
revealed that the workers of Sysco
Denver-IT Department reported to
PO 00000
16827
individuals within the Sysco Denver
Operating Company and received wages
as employees of Sysco Denver LLC.
Sysco Corporation did not employ these
individuals nor did Sysco Corporate
control or direct their daily activities.
The request for reconsideration
implies that since individuals and pairs
of workers constitute a worker group,
the subject workers constitute a worker
group. 29 CFR 90.2 defines a group of
workers as three or more workers in a
firm or appropriate subdivision thereof.
The petitioning worker group in TA–W–
82,383 met the requirements of a group.
Information obtained during the
reconsideration investigation confirmed
that with respect to Section 222(a) and
Section 222(b) of the Act, Criterion (1)
has not been met because a significant
number or proportion of the workers in
such workers’ firm have not become
totally or partially separated, nor are
they threatened to become totally or
partially separated.
A careful review of previouslysubmitted information and information
obtained during the reconsideration
investigation revealed that the worker
group consisting of Sysco Denver LLC,
a subsidiary of Sysco Corporation,
Information Technology (IT)
Department, Denver, Colorado, did not
meet this requirement.
The workers’ firm has not been
publically identified by name by the
International Trade Commission as a
member of a domestic industry in an
investigation resulting in an affirmative
finding of serious injury, market
disruption, or material injury, or threat
thereof.
Therefore, after careful review of the
request for reconsideration, the
Department determines that 29 CFR
90.18(c) has not been met.
Conclusion
After careful review of previouslysubmitted information and information
obtained during the reconsideration
investigation, I affirm the notice of
negative determination of eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance
for workers and former workers of Sysco
Denver LLC, a subsidiary of Sysco
Corporation, Information Technology
(IT) Department, Denver, Colorado, in
E:\FR\FM\26MRN1.SGM
26MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 58 (Wednesday, March 26, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16825-16827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-06677]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment
assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of
March 3, 2014 through March 7, 2014.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied:
(1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) the sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased
absolutely; and
(3) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) imports of articles or services like or directly competitive
with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have
increased;
(B) imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are
directly incorporated, have increased;
(C) imports of articles directly incorporating one or more
component parts produced outside the United States that are like or
directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more
component parts produced by such firm have increased;
(D) imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have
increased; and
(4) the increase in imports contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the
sales or production of such firm; or
II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied:
(1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) there has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign
country in the production of articles or supply of services like or
directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm;
(B) there has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the
workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly
competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and
(3) the shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers'
separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must
be met.
(1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in the public
agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to
become totally or partially separated;
(2) the public agency has acquired from a foreign country services
like or
[[Page 16826]]
directly competitive with services which are supplied by such agency;
and
(3) the acquisition of services contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must
be met.
(1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in the
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) the workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a
firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of
eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or
production is related to the article or service that was the basis for
such certification; and
(3) either--
(A) the workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least
20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or
(B) a loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described
in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or
threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade
Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply
for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met.
(1) the workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the
International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an
investigation resulting in--
(A) an affirmative determination of serious injury or threat
thereof under section 202(b)(1);
(B) an affirmative determination of market disruption or threat
thereof under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) an affirmative final determination of material injury or threat
thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) the petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the
date on which--
(A) a summary of the report submitted to the President by the
International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to
the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is
published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or
(B) notice of an affirmative determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and
(3) the workers have become totally or partially separated from the
workers' firm within--
(A) the 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or
(B) notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding
the 1-year period described in paragraph (2).
Affirmative Determinations For Worker Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been
met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
83,099.................. Niagara Ceramics........... Buffalo, NY........... September 19, 2012.
83,238.................. Keywell LLC................ Chicago, IL........... November 21, 2012.
83,334D................. IBM Corporation, 200 MM Essex Junction, VT.... December 24, 2012.
Manufacturing, Micro
Electronics, D&M, STG.
83,355.................. J. Kinderman and Sons, Philadelphia, PA...... August 20, 2013.
Inc., T/A Brite Star
Manufacturing Company.
83,356.................. Convergys Customer Brownsville, TX....... December 31, 2012
Management Group, Inc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act
have been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
83,131.................. Boston Scientific, Gemini Arden Hills, MN....... September 30, 2012.
Staffing Consultants,
Advantage Resourcing, etc.
83,131A................. Boston Scientific, Gemini Marlborough, MA....... September 30, 2012.
Staffing Consultants,
Advantage Resourcing, etc.
83,208.................. The Longaberger Company, Buffalo, NY........... November 7, 2012.
Longaberger Pottery Works.
83,334.................. IBM Corporation, Technical Essex Junction, VT.... December 24, 2012.
Operations, Systems and
Technology Group (STG),
Software.
83,334A................. IBM Corporation, Division Essex Junction, VT.... December 24, 2012.
47 Global Procurement,
Integrated Supply, Systems
and Tech, Software.
83,334E................. IBM Corporation, 200 MM Essex Junction, VT.... December 24, 2012
Enablement, 200 MM
Engineering, Micro
Electronics, D&M, STG.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Negative Determinations For Worker Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met
for the reasons specified.
The investigation revealed that the criteria under
paragraphs(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in
production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not
been met.
[[Page 16827]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
83,218.................. The Boeing Company, Annapolis Junction, MD .................................
Information Technology
Operations Center.
83,334B................. IBM Corporation, Power Essex Junction, VT .................................
System Technology,
Enterprise Systems,
Development.
83,334C................. IBM Corporation, Game Chip Essex Junction, VT .................................
Design, OEM
Microprocessors,
Enterprise Systems, D&M,
STG.
83,345.................. Kaleidoscope Industries, Howell, MI .................................
Inc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued
during the period of March 3, 2014 through March 7, 2014. These
determinations are available on the Department's Web site tradeact/taa/
taa--search--cfm under the searchable listing of determinations or by
calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance toll free at 888-365-
6822.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of March 2014.
Hope D. Kinglock,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2014-06677 Filed 3-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
