Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 15948-15949 [2014-06392]
Download as PDF
15948
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 56 / Monday, March 24, 2014 / Notices
146. Zibo Wuzhou Tanshun Carbon Co., Ltd.
Companies that are now part of the PRC
entity because they did not demonstrate in
this review that they are entitled to a separate
rate.
1. Fushun Jinly Petrochemical Carbon Co.,
Ltd.
2. Fangda Lanzhou Carbon Joint Stock
Company Co., Ltd.
3. Jilin Carbon Graphite Material Co., Ltd.
4. Lanzhou Carbon Co., Ltd.
5. Lanzhou Carbon Import & Export Corp.
6. Lanzhou Hailong New Material Co.
7. Lanzhou Hailong Technology
8. Liaoning Fangda Group Industrial Co., Ltd.
9. Sinosteel Anhui Co., Ltd.
10. Sinosteel Corp.
11. Sinosteel Jilin Carbon Plant
12. Sinosteel Jilin Carbon Imp. & Exp. Co.,
Ltd.
13. Sinosteel Sichuan Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2014–06399 Filed 3–21–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–351–825]
Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2012–
2013
Enforcement and Compliance,
formerly Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on stainless
steel bar (SSB) from Brazil. The period
of review (POR) is February 1, 2012,
through January 31, 2013. The review
covers one producer/exporter of the
subject merchandise, Villares Metals
S.A. (Villares). We preliminarily find
that subject merchandise has not been
sold at less than normal value.1
Interested parties are invited to
comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Effective Date: March 24, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sandra Dreisonstok or Minoo Hatten,
AD/CVD Operations, Office I,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
1 The deadline for the preliminary results of this
review was March 17, 2014. Due to the closure of
the Federal Government in Washington, DC on
March 17, 2014, the Department reached this
determination on the next business day (i.e., March
18, 2014). See Notice of Clarification: Application
of ‘‘Next Business Day’’ Rule for Administrative
Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act
of 1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:29 Mar 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
482–0768, and (202) 482–1690,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is SSB. The SSB subject to the order is
currently classifiable under subheadings
7222.10.00, 7222.11.00, 7222.19.00,
7222.20.00, 7222.30.00 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS). The HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes.2
The written description is dispositive.
The Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS).
Access to IA ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
iaaccess.trade.gov and is available to all
parties in the Central Records Unit,
Room 7046 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly on the Internet at https://
enforcement.trade.gov. The signed
Preliminary Decision Memorandum and
the electronic versions of the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
Methodology
The Department conducted this
review in accordance with section
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). Constructed export
price is calculated in accordance with
section 772 of the Act. Normal value is
calculated in accordance with section
773 of the Act. For a full description of
the methodology underlying our
conclusions, see Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
Preliminary Results of Review
As a result of this review, we
preliminarily determine that a
weighted-average dumping margin of
0.00 percent exists for Villares for the
period February 1, 2012, through
January 31, 2013.
2 A full description of the scope of the order is
contained in the memorandum from Christian
Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul
Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Stainless Steel Bar from
Brazil’’ dated concurrently with this notice
(Preliminary Decision Memorandum), which is
hereby adopted by this notice.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Disclosure and Public Comment
We intend to disclose the calculations
performed to parties in this proceeding
within five days of the date of
publication of this notice in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Pursuant to 19
CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may
submit case briefs not later than 30 days
after the date of publication of this
notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues
raised in the case briefs, may be filed
not later than five days after the date for
filing case briefs.3 Parties who submit
case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this
proceeding are encouraged to submit
with each argument: (1) A statement of
the issue; (2) a brief summary of the
argument; and (3) a table of authorities.4
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing, or to participate if one is
requested, must submit a written
request to the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, filed
electronically via IA ACCESS. An
electronically filed document must be
received successfully in its entirety by
the Department’s electronic records
system, IA ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern
Standard Time within 30 days after the
date of publication of this notice.5
Requests should contain: (1) The party’s
name, address and telephone number;
(2) the number of participants; and (3)
a list of issues to be discussed. Issues
raised in the hearing will be limited to
those raised in the respective case
briefs. The Department intends to issue
the final results of this administrative
review, including the results of its
analysis of the issues raised in any
written briefs, not later than 120 days
after the date of publication of this
notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A)
of the Act.
Assessment Rates
Upon completion of the
administrative review, the Department
shall determine and U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) shall assess
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries. If Villares’ weighted-average
dumping margin is above de minimis in
the final results of this review, we will
calculate an importer-specific
assessment rate on the basis of the ratio
of the total amount of antidumping
duties calculated for the importer’s
examined sales and the total entered
value of the sales in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(b)(1). If Villares’ weightedaverage dumping margin continues to be
zero or de minimis in the final results
3 See
19 CFR 351.309(d).
19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing
requirements).
5 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
4 See
E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM
24MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 56 / Monday, March 24, 2014 / Notices
of review, we will instruct CBP not to
assess duties on any of its entries in
accordance with the Final Modification
for Reviews, i.e., ‘‘{w}here the weightedaverage margin of dumping for the
exporter is determined to be zero or de
minimis, no antidumping duties will be
assessed.’’ 6
The Department clarified its
‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on
May 6, 2003. This clarification will
apply to entries of subject merchandise
during the POR produced by Villares for
which it did not know its merchandise
was destined for the United States. In
such instances, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction. For a full discussion of
this clarification, see Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
We intend to issue instructions to
CBP 15 days after publication of the
final results of this review.
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
will be effective upon publication of the
notice of final results of administrative
review for all shipments of SSB from
Brazil entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
the date of publication as provided by
section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash
deposit rate for Villares will be the rate
established in the final results of this
administrative review; (2) for
merchandise exported by manufacturers
or exporters not covered in this review
but covered in a prior segment of the
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recent period; (3)
if the exporter is not a firm covered in
this review, a prior review, or the
original investigation but the
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate
will be the rate established for the most
recent period for the manufacturer of
the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit
rate for all other manufacturers or
exporters will continue to be 19.43
percent, the all-others rate established
in the Notice of Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Stainless
Steel Bar From Brazil, 59 FR 66914
(December 28, 1994). These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
6 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 80102
(February 14, 2012).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:29 Mar 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: March 18, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
A. Summary
B. Background
C. Scope of the Order
D. Discussion of the Methodology
1. Comparisons to Normal Value
a. Determination of Comparison Method
b. Results of Differential Pricing Analysis
c. Sales Outside the Ordinary Course of
Trade
d. Costs of Production for Certain Control
Numbers
2. Product Comparisons
3. Date of Sale
4. Constructed Export Price
5. Normal Value
a. Home Market Viability as Comparison
Market
b. Level of Trade
c. Cost of Production
(1) Calculation of Cost of Production
(2) Results of COP Test
d. Calculation of Normal Value Based on
Comparison Market Prices
E. Currency Conversion
F. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2014–06392 Filed 3–21–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–893]
Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
From the People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2012–
2013
Enforcement and Compliance,
formerly Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) is conducting an
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15949
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
frozen warmwater shrimp (‘‘shrimp’’)
From the People’s Republic of China
(‘‘PRC’’), covering the period of review
(‘‘POR’’) from February 1, 2012, through
January 31, 2013. As discussed below,
the Department preliminarily
determines that Zhanjiang Newpro
Foods Co., Ltd. (‘‘Newpro’’), and Hilltop
International (‘‘Hilltop’’) failed to
cooperate to the best of their ability in
this review. Accordingly, the
Department is finding Newpro and
Hilltop are part of the PRC-wide entity
to which we are applying adverse facts
available (‘‘AFA’’), as discussed below.
Interested parties are invited to
comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Effective Date: March 24, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kabir Archuletta, AD/CVD Operations,
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
482–2593.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is certain frozen warmwater shrimp.1
The product is currently classified
under the following Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’) item numbers:
0306.17.00.03, 0306.17.00.06,
0306.17.00.09, 0306.17.00.12,
0306.17.00.15, 0306.17.00.18,
0306.17.00.21, 0306.17.00.24,
0306.17.00.27, 0306.17.00.40,
1605.21.10.30, and 1605.29.10.10.
Although the HTSUS numbers are
provided for convenience and for
customs purposes, the written product
description, available in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum, remains
dispositive.
Tolling of Deadlines for Preliminary
Determination
As explained in the memorandum
from the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, the
Department exercised its discretion to
toll deadlines for the duration of the
closure of the Federal Government from
1 See the Decision Memorandum for Preliminary
Results for the Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review of Warmwater Shrimp From the People’s
Republic of China,’’ (‘‘Preliminary Decision
Memorandum’’) from Christian Marsh, Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, dated concurrently with these results,
for a complete description of the Scope of the
Order.
E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM
24MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 56 (Monday, March 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15948-15949]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-06392]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-351-825]
Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, formerly Import Administration,
International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on stainless steel
bar (SSB) from Brazil. The period of review (POR) is February 1, 2012,
through January 31, 2013. The review covers one producer/exporter of
the subject merchandise, Villares Metals S.A. (Villares). We
preliminarily find that subject merchandise has not been sold at less
than normal value.\1\ Interested parties are invited to comment on
these preliminary results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The deadline for the preliminary results of this review was
March 17, 2014. Due to the closure of the Federal Government in
Washington, DC on March 17, 2014, the Department reached this
determination on the next business day (i.e., March 18, 2014). See
Notice of Clarification: Application of ``Next Business Day'' Rule
for Administrative Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff
Act of 1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: March 24, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandra Dreisonstok or Minoo Hatten,
AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0768, and (202) 482-1690, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order is SSB. The SSB subject to the
order is currently classifiable under subheadings 7222.10.00,
7222.11.00, 7222.19.00, 7222.20.00, 7222.30.00 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs purposes.\2\ The written
description is dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ A full description of the scope of the order is contained in
the memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Decision
Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Stainless Steel Bar from Brazil'' dated
concurrently with this notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum),
which is hereby adopted by this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on
file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS).
Access to IA ACCESS is available to registered users at https://iaaccess.trade.gov and is available to all parties in the Central
Records Unit, Room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the Internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov.
The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions
of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
Methodology
The Department conducted this review in accordance with section
751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Constructed
export price is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act.
Normal value is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act.
For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions,
see Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
Preliminary Results of Review
As a result of this review, we preliminarily determine that a
weighted-average dumping margin of 0.00 percent exists for Villares for
the period February 1, 2012, through January 31, 2013.
Disclosure and Public Comment
We intend to disclose the calculations performed to parties in this
proceeding within five days of the date of publication of this notice
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c),
interested parties may submit case briefs not later than 30 days after
the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to
issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed not later than five days
after the date for filing case briefs.\3\ Parties who submit case
briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit
with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary
of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
\4\ See 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing, or to participate if one is requested, must submit a
written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, filed electronically via IA ACCESS. An electronically filed
document must be received successfully in its entirety by the
Department's electronic records system, IA ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern
Standard Time within 30 days after the date of publication of this
notice.\5\ Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and
telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of
issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to
those raised in the respective case briefs. The Department intends to
issue the final results of this administrative review, including the
results of its analysis of the issues raised in any written briefs, not
later than 120 days after the date of publication of this notice,
pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Upon completion of the administrative review, the Department shall
determine and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. If Villares' weighted-
average dumping margin is above de minimis in the final results of this
review, we will calculate an importer-specific assessment rate on the
basis of the ratio of the total amount of antidumping duties calculated
for the importer's examined sales and the total entered value of the
sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). If Villares' weighted-
average dumping margin continues to be zero or de minimis in the final
results
[[Page 15949]]
of review, we will instruct CBP not to assess duties on any of its
entries in accordance with the Final Modification for Reviews, i.e.,
``{w{time} here the weighted-average margin of dumping for the exporter
is determined to be zero or de minimis, no antidumping duties will be
assessed.'' \6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 80102 (February 14,
2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on
May 6, 2003. This clarification will apply to entries of subject
merchandise during the POR produced by Villares for which it did not
know its merchandise was destined for the United States. In such
instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the
all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies)
involved in the transaction. For a full discussion of this
clarification, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of
the final results of this review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for
all shipments of SSB from Brazil entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of publication as provided by
section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Villares
will be the rate established in the final results of this
administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by manufacturers or
exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of
the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-
specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter
is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original
investigation but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be
the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of
the merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers
or exporters will continue to be 19.43 percent, the all-others rate
established in the Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than
Fair Value: Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil, 59 FR 66914 (December 28,
1994). These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in
effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: March 18, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
A. Summary
B. Background
C. Scope of the Order
D. Discussion of the Methodology
1. Comparisons to Normal Value
a. Determination of Comparison Method
b. Results of Differential Pricing Analysis
c. Sales Outside the Ordinary Course of Trade
d. Costs of Production for Certain Control Numbers
2. Product Comparisons
3. Date of Sale
4. Constructed Export Price
5. Normal Value
a. Home Market Viability as Comparison Market
b. Level of Trade
c. Cost of Production
(1) Calculation of Cost of Production
(2) Results of COP Test
d. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices
E. Currency Conversion
F. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2014-06392 Filed 3-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P