Low-Enriched Uranium From France; Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 15955-15957 [2014-06388]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 56 / Monday, March 24, 2014 / Notices discussion of this clarification, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). We intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties 20 See Implementation of the Findings of the WTO Panel in United States Antidumping Measure on Shrimp from Thailand: Notice of Determination Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act and Partial Revocation of the Antidumping Duty Order on Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From Thailand, 74 FR 5638 (January 30, 2009) (Section 129 Determination). 14:29 Mar 21, 2014 Dated: March 18, 2014. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix The following deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for each specific company listed above will be that established in the final results of this review, except if the rate is less than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not participating in this review, the cash deposit will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, or the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent segment for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 5.34 percent, the all-others rate made effective by the Section 129 Determination.20 These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. VerDate Mar<15>2010 occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Jkt 232001 List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 1. Summary 2. Background 3. Scope of the Order 4. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments 5. Rescission of Review, In Part 6. Collapsing of Thai Union and Pakfood 7. Discussion of the Methodology a. Fair Value Comparison b. Determination of Comparison Method c. Product Comparisons d. Export Price/Constructed Export Price i. Pakfood ii. Thai Union iii. Thai Union/Pakfood e. Normal Value i. Home Market Viability ii. Affiliated-Party Transactions and Arm’sLength Test iii. Level of Trade 1. Pakfood 2. Thai Union 3. Thai Union/Pakfood iv. Cost of Production Analysis 1. Calculation of Cost of Production 2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices 3. Results of the COP Test v. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices 1. Pakfood 2. Thai Union 3. Thai Union/Pakfood 8. Currency Conversion 9. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2014–06433 Filed 3–21–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–427–818] Low-Enriched Uranium From France; Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012– 2013 Enforcement and Compliance, formerly Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. AGENCY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on low- SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 15955 enriched uranium (LEU) from France.1 The period of review (POR) is February 1, 2012, through January 31, 2013. The review covers one producer or exporter of the subject merchandise, Eurodif S.A., AREVA NC, and AREVA NC, Inc. (collectively AREVA). The Department preliminarily determines that AREVA made no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. The deadline for the preliminary results of this review was March 17, 2014. Due to the closure of the Federal Government in Washington, DC on March 17, 2014, the Department reached this determination on the next business day (i.e., March 18, 2014). See Notice of Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next Business Day’’ Rule for Administrative Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005). DATES: Effective Date: March 24, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Huston, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4261. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Scope of the Order The product covered by the order is all low-enriched uranium. Lowenriched uranium is enriched uranium hexafluoride (UF6) with a U235 product assay of less than 20 percent that has not been converted into another chemical form, such as UO2, or fabricated into nuclear fuel assemblies, regardless of the means by which the LEU is produced (including lowenriched uranium produced through the down-blending of highly enriched uranium).2 Methodology The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the 1 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 78 FR 19197 (March 9, 2013). 2 For a full description of the scope of the order, see ‘‘Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Low-Enriched Uranium from France: 2012– 2013’’ from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with these results and hereby adopted by this notice. E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM 24MRN1 15956 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 56 / Monday, March 24, 2014 / Notices Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’). IA ACCESS is available to registered users at http:// iaaccess.trade.gov, and it is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit in Room 7046 of the main Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Preliminary Determination of No Shipments AREVA timely filed a ‘‘no shipment’’ certification stating that they had no entries of subject merchandise during the POR. However, data that the Department obtained from U.S. Customs and Border Protection showed entries of LEU from AREVA during the POR. The Department issued two questionnaires to AREVA, and received timely responses. Based on the questionnaire responses filed by AREVA, we preliminarily determine that AREVA had no shipments of merchandise subject to the antidumping order on LEU from France during the POR. In addition, the Department finds that it is not appropriate to rescind the review with respect to AREVA but, rather, to complete the review and issue appropriate instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) based on the final results of this review, as is our current practice.3 date of publication of the final results of this administrative review. We invite all interested parties to comment on this issue. requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Assessment Rates Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results and submit written arguments or case briefs within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice, unless otherwise notified by the Department.7 Parties are reminded that written comments or case briefs are not the place for submitting new factual material. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, will be due five days later.8 Parties that submit case or rebuttal briefs are requested to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; and (2) a brief summary of the argument. Parties are requested to provide a summary of the arguments not to exceed five pages and a table of statutes, regulations, and cases cited. Any interested party who wishes to request a hearing, or to participate if one is requested, must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance within 30 days after the day of publication of this notice. A request should contain: (1) The party’s name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed.9 Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in case briefs. The Department will issue the final results of administrative review, including the results of our analysis of issues raised in any briefs, within 90 days after the date on which the preliminary results were issued, unless the deadline for the final results is extended.10 Since the Department preliminarily found that AREVA had no shipments during the POR, we did not calculate importer-specific assessment rates for these preliminary results of review. The Department clarified its ‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on May 6, 2003. This clarification will apply to entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by companies included in the final results of review for which these companies did not know that the merchandise was destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate un-reviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.5 We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements Preliminary Determination of Revised Entry Requirements During the course of this review, the Department identified irregularities associated with AREVA’s filing of the required certifications for reexportation.4 In light of these problems, and to ensure proper enforcement of the order, the Department preliminarily determines that shipments of LEU from France by AREVA, where the importer claims the above-noted scope exclusion, shall be suspended as antidumping entries with a cash deposit requirement of zero percent ad valorem. These requirements will be effective as of the The following deposit requirements will be effective for all shipments of LEU from France entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of this administrative review, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for AREVA will remain unchanged from the rate assigned to the company in the most recently completed review of that company, except for entries excluded from the order under the re-export provision of the scope, which will require a cash deposit rate of zero percent; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the less-thanfair-value investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to be 19.95 percent, the all-others rate established in the investigation.6 These cash deposit 3 See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From Thailand: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Intent To Revoke the Order (in Part); 2011–2012, 78 FR 15686 (March 12, 2013) and the accompanying Decision Memorandum at 7–8. 4 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 5 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 6 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Low Enriched Uranium From France, 67 FR 6680 (February 13, 2002). VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:29 Mar 21, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Comments Notification to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to the importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. These preliminary results of administrative review are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 7 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii). 19 CFR 351.309(d). 9 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 10 See 19 CFR 351.213(h). 8 See E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM 24MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 56 / Monday, March 24, 2014 / Notices Dated: March 18, 2014. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2014–06388 Filed 3–21–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–821–820] Ferrosilicon From the Russian Federation: Postponement of Final Antidumping Determination Enforcement and Compliance, formerly Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. DATES: Effective Date: March 24, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irene Gorelik at (202) 482–6905, AD/ CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 11, 2014, the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) published its preliminary determination in the antidumping duty investigation on ferrosilicon from the Russian Federation.1 The Preliminary Determination stated that the Department would issue its final determination not later than 75 days after the date of publication of the Preliminary Determination in the Federal Register, in accordance with section 735(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’). The final determination is currently due not later than May 25, 2014.2 On March 7, 2014, CC Metals and Alloys, LLC and Globe Specialty Metals, Inc. (together, ‘‘Petitioners’’), requested postponement of the final determination pursuant to section 735(a)(2)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(2)(i).3 Because the Department’s preliminary determination in this investigation was AGENCY: WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 1 See Ferrosilicon from the Russian Federation: Preliminary Determination of Sales at Not Less Than Fair Value, 79 FR 13620 (March 11, 2014) (‘‘Preliminary Determination’’). 2 The deadline for the postponement of this investigation was March 17, 2014. Due to the closure of the Federal Government in Washington, DC on March 17, 2014, the Department reached this determination on the next business day (i.e., March 18, 2014). See Notice of Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next Business Day’’ Rule for Administrative Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005). 3 See Letter from Petitioners, Re: Request for Postponement of the Final Determination, dated March 7, 2014. VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:29 Mar 21, 2014 Jkt 232001 negative and no compelling reason exists to deny the request, in accordance with section 735(a)(2)(B) of the Act, 19 CFR 351.210(b)(2)(i), and 19 CFR 351.210(e), the Department is granting the request and postponing the final determination until not later than 135 days after the publication of the Preliminary Determination in the Federal Register. The 60 day extension from the current deadline of May 25, 2014, results in a new deadline of July 24, 2014, for the final determination in this investigation. This notice is issued and published pursuant to section 735(a)(2)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(g). Dated: March 18, 2014. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2014–06432 Filed 3–21–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Alaska Region Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Crab Arbitration National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Commerce. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before May 23, 2014. ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at jjessup@doc.gov). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or copies of the information collection instrument and instructions should be directed to Patsy A. Bearden, (907) 586– 7008 or patsy.bearden@noaa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: I. Abstract This request is for extension of a currently approved collection. PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 15957 The Crab Rationalization Program allocates Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands (BSAI) crab resources among harvesters, processors, and coastal communities through a limited access system that balances the interests of these groups who depend on these fisheries. Program components include quota share allocation, processor quota share allocation, individual fishing quota and individual processing quota issuance, quota transfers, use caps, crab harvesting cooperatives, protections for Gulf of Alaska groundfish fisheries, arbitration system, monitoring, economic data collection, and cost recovery fee collection. The Crab Rationalization Program Arbitration System is established by the contracts required pursuant to 50CF 680.20, including the process by which the Market Report and Non-Binding Price Formula are produced, as well as the negotiation approaches, the Binding Arbitration process, and fee collection. II. Method of Collection Responses are mailed, except that the Non-binding Price Formula Report may be submitted electronically. III. Data OMB Control Number: 0648–0516. Form Number: None. Type of Review: Regular submission (extension of a currently approved collection). Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations; individuals or households. Estimated Number of Respondents: 49. Estimated Time per Response: Combined Annual Arbitration Organization Notification and Report, 5 hours; Contract Arbitrator Report, 4 hours; Combined Shared Arbitration Accounting Report, 20 hours. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 78. Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public: $435,545 in recordkeeping/ reporting costs. IV. Request for Comments Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden (including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM 24MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 56 (Monday, March 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15955-15957]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-06388]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-427-818]


Low-Enriched Uranium From France; Preliminary Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, formerly Import Administration, 
International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on low-enriched 
uranium (LEU) from France.\1\ The period of review (POR) is February 1, 
2012, through January 31, 2013. The review covers one producer or 
exporter of the subject merchandise, Eurodif S.A., AREVA NC, and AREVA 
NC, Inc. (collectively AREVA). The Department preliminarily determines 
that AREVA made no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. We 
invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. The 
deadline for the preliminary results of this review was March 17, 2014. 
Due to the closure of the Federal Government in Washington, DC on March 
17, 2014, the Department reached this determination on the next 
business day (i.e., March 18, 2014). See Notice of Clarification: 
Application of ``Next Business Day'' Rule for Administrative 
Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, As Amended, 
70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 78 FR 
19197 (March 9, 2013).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: March 24, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Huston, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
4261.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Scope of the Order

    The product covered by the order is all low-enriched uranium. Low-
enriched uranium is enriched uranium hexafluoride (UF6) with 
a U\235\ product assay of less than 20 percent that has not been 
converted into another chemical form, such as UO2, or 
fabricated into nuclear fuel assemblies, regardless of the means by 
which the LEU is produced (including low-enriched uranium produced 
through the down-blending of highly enriched uranium).\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ For a full description of the scope of the order, see 
``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review: Low-Enriched Uranium from France: 2012-
2013'' from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations to Paul Piquado, 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance (Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum), dated concurrently with these results and 
hereby adopted by this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Methodology

    The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 
751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For a full 
description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the

[[Page 15956]]

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is 
on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (``IA 
ACCESS''). IA ACCESS is available to registered users at http://iaaccess.trade.gov, and it is available to all parties in the Central 
Records Unit in Room 7046 of the main Commerce building. In addition, a 
complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed 
directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary 
Decision Memorandum and electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum are identical in content.

Preliminary Determination of No Shipments

    AREVA timely filed a ``no shipment'' certification stating that 
they had no entries of subject merchandise during the POR. However, 
data that the Department obtained from U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection showed entries of LEU from AREVA during the POR. The 
Department issued two questionnaires to AREVA, and received timely 
responses. Based on the questionnaire responses filed by AREVA, we 
preliminarily determine that AREVA had no shipments of merchandise 
subject to the antidumping order on LEU from France during the POR. In 
addition, the Department finds that it is not appropriate to rescind 
the review with respect to AREVA but, rather, to complete the review 
and issue appropriate instructions to U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) based on the final results of this review, as is our 
current practice.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From Thailand: 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 
Intent To Revoke the Order (in Part); 2011-2012, 78 FR 15686 (March 
12, 2013) and the accompanying Decision Memorandum at 7-8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Preliminary Determination of Revised Entry Requirements

    During the course of this review, the Department identified 
irregularities associated with AREVA's filing of the required 
certifications for re-exportation.\4\ In light of these problems, and 
to ensure proper enforcement of the order, the Department preliminarily 
determines that shipments of LEU from France by AREVA, where the 
importer claims the above-noted scope exclusion, shall be suspended as 
antidumping entries with a cash deposit requirement of zero percent ad 
valorem. These requirements will be effective as of the date of 
publication of the final results of this administrative review. We 
invite all interested parties to comment on this issue.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    Since the Department preliminarily found that AREVA had no 
shipments during the POR, we did not calculate importer-specific 
assessment rates for these preliminary results of review.
    The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on 
May 6, 2003. This clarification will apply to entries of subject 
merchandise during the POR produced by companies included in the final 
results of review for which these companies did not know that the 
merchandise was destined for the United States. In such instances, we 
will instruct CBP to liquidate un-reviewed entries at the all-others 
rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in 
the transaction.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of 
the final results of this review.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following deposit requirements will be effective for all 
shipments of LEU from France entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for 
consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of 
this administrative review, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of 
the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for AREVA will remain unchanged from 
the rate assigned to the company in the most recently completed review 
of that company, except for entries excluded from the order under the 
re-export provision of the scope, which will require a cash deposit 
rate of zero percent; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated 
companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be 
the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if 
the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or 
the less-than-fair-value investigation, but the manufacturer is, the 
cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent 
period for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash 
deposit rate for all other manufacturers or exporters will continue to 
be 19.95 percent, the all-others rate established in the 
investigation.\6\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less 
Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Low Enriched Uranium 
From France, 67 FR 6680 (February 13, 2002).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments

    Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary 
results and submit written arguments or case briefs within 30 days 
after the date of publication of this notice, unless otherwise notified 
by the Department.\7\ Parties are reminded that written comments or 
case briefs are not the place for submitting new factual material. 
Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, will be 
due five days later.\8\ Parties that submit case or rebuttal briefs are 
requested to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; 
and (2) a brief summary of the argument. Parties are requested to 
provide a summary of the arguments not to exceed five pages and a table 
of statutes, regulations, and cases cited.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii).
    \8\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any interested party who wishes to request a hearing, or to 
participate if one is requested, must submit a written request to the 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance within 30 days after 
the day of publication of this notice. A request should contain: (1) 
The party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of 
participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed.\9\ Issues 
raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in case briefs. 
The Department will issue the final results of administrative review, 
including the results of our analysis of issues raised in any briefs, 
within 90 days after the date on which the preliminary results were 
issued, unless the deadline for the final results is extended.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
    \10\ See 19 CFR 351.213(h).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to the importers of 
their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply 
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.
    These preliminary results of administrative review are issued and 
published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 
Act.


[[Page 15957]]


    Dated: March 18, 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014-06388 Filed 3-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P