Copyright Office Fees: Registration, Recordation and Related Services; Special Services; Licensing Division Services; FOIA Services, 15910-15920 [2014-06293]
Download as PDF
15910
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 56 / Monday, March 24, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
project operating under an existing
Commission approval, the project
approval reference and a description of
the operational changes requested.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: March 17, 2014.
Stephanie L. Richardson,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014–06323 Filed 3–21–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7040–01–P
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
U.S. Copyright Office
37 CFR Parts 201 and 203
[Docket No. 2012–1]
Copyright Office Fees: Registration,
Recordation and Related Services;
Special Services; Licensing Division
Services; FOIA Services
U.S. Copyright Office, Library
of Congress.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The United States Copyright
Office of the Library of Congress is
publishing a final rule establishing
adjusted fees for its services. The
adjusted fees will recover a significant
part of the costs to the Office of
registering copyright claims and provide
greater cost recovery for certain other
services provided by the Office. The
new fee schedule reflects some
increased and decreased fees, as well as
some fees that the Office determined did
not require adjustment. Under the new
fee structure, the fee for online
registration of a standard claim will
increase from $35 to $55. However, a
new online registration option for single
works by single authors that are not
works made for hire has been
introduced at a lower fee of $35. In
addition to fees for registration, related
services, and special services, this final
rule establishes updated fees for FOIArelated services.
DATES: This rule is effective May 1,
2014.
SUMMARY:
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jacqueline C. Charlesworth, General
Counsel and Associate Register of
Copyrights, or Chris Weston, AttorneyAdvisor, Office of the General Counsel,
at the U.S. Copyright Office, Copyright
GC/I&R, P.O. Box 70400, Washington,
DC 20024. Telephone: (202) 707–8350.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
This final rule adjusts Copyright
Office fees in accordance with the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:35 Mar 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
applicable provisions of title 17, United
States Code (the ‘‘Copyright Act’’ or
‘‘Act’’). While some of the Office’s
services are free to the public—
including the Public Information
Office’s provision of valuable guidance
on copyright registration and other
issues—the Office does charge fees for
many of its services.1 The Copyright Act
provides that the Register of Copyrights
may adjust the Office’s fees based on a
study of its costs for administering the
registration of claims and recordation of
documents and the provision of other
services.2 Since the Act was amended to
provide for these adjustments, the Office
has undertaken fee studies every several
years and made changes accordingly.
The Office last adjusted its fees in
2009.3
Section 708(a) of the Act specifies that
‘‘[f]ees shall be paid to Register of
Copyrights’’ for the following services:
(1) Filing an application under Section
408 for registration of a copyright
claim or for a supplementary
registration, including the issuance
of a certificate of registration if
registration is made
(2) Filing an application for registration
of a claim for renewal of a
subsisting copyright, including the
issuance of a certificate of
registration if registration is made
(3) Issuing a receipt for a deposit under
Section 407
(4) Recording a transfer of copyright
ownership or other document
(5) Filing a notice of intention to obtain
a compulsory license under Section
115(b)
(6) Recording a statement revealing the
identity of an author of an
anonymous or pseudonymous
work, or recording a statement
relating to the death of an author
(7) Issuing an additional certificate of
registration
(8) Issuing any other certification
(9) Making and reporting of a search,
and any related services
(10) Filing a statement of account based
on secondary transmissions of
1 See
17 U.S.C. 708.
17 U.S.C. 708(b).
3 Fees, 74 FR 32805 (U.S. Copyright Office July 9,
2009). In 1997, Congress created a new fee system
allowing the Office to set all of its fees by regulation
rather than in the statute. An Act to make technical
amendments to certain provisions of title 17, United
States Code, Public Law 105–80, 111 Stat. 1529
(1997). Before then, Congress itself set the fees for
certain basic copyright services, including
registration and recordation (often referred to as
‘‘statutory fees’’) and the Register set the fees for
other special services by regulation. In enacting
statutory copyright fees, Congress considered a
number of criteria, including the cost of providing
the service, the value of the service to the Library
of Congress, and the benefit of the service to the
general public.
2 See
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
primary transmissions pursuant to
Sections 119 and 122
(11) Filing a statement of account based
on secondary transmissions of
primary transmissions pursuant to
Section 111
In addition, Section 708(a) authorizes
the Register to fix fees for other services,
such as the cost of preparing copies of
Office records.
Section 708 contemplates two
different fee-setting mechanisms. Fees
for the services described in (1) through
(9) above—which include the Office’s
registration and recordation functions
and thus reflect especially important
public policy objectives—are to be set
forth in a proposed schedule that is sent
to Congress 120 days before the adjusted
fees can take effect.4 Other fees,
including those for the filing of cable
and satellite statements of account
under (10) and (11) and additional
Office services, are not submitted to
Congress but instead are established by
the Register of Copyrights based on the
Office’s costs.5
Before proposing new fees for the
services enumerated in (1) through (9),
the Register must conduct a study of the
Office’s costs for registering claims,
recording documents, and providing
other services, and must consider the
timing of any fee adjustments and the
Office’s authority to use the fees
consistent with the Office’s budget.6
Section 708(b) further provides that the
Register may adjust these fees to ‘‘not
more than necessary to cover the
4 17 U.S.C. 708(b). The Register sent the proposed
schedule to Congress on November 14, 2013. It is
available at https://www.copyright.gov/docs/
newfees/USCOFeeStudy-Nov13.pdf.
5 Id. section 708(a). With the 2010 enactment of
the Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act
of 2010, Public Law 111–175, 124 Stat. 1218 (2010)
(codified in Sections 111, 119, and 122 of title 17)
(‘‘STELA’’), Congress for the first time authorized
the Office to charge fees to licensees for the Office’s
processing of cable and satellite statements of
account under the Section 111, 119, and 122
statutory licenses. Such fees are to be ‘‘reasonable
and may not exceed one-half of the cost necessary
to cover reasonable expenses incurred by the
Copyright Office for the collection and
administration of the statements of account and any
royalty fees deposited with such statements.’’ 17
U.S.C. 708(a). To implement STELA, the Office
conducted a study of its costs in relation to the
filing of cable and satellite statements and solicited
input from stakeholders on proposed fees through
a notice and comment proceeding. See Copyright
Office Fees, 77 FR 18742 (Mar. 28, 2012); Copyright
Office Fees, 77 FR 72788 (Dec. 6, 2012), both
available at https://www.copyright.gov/docs/
newfees/. As noted above, the STELA fees are not
required to be submitted to Congress. In November
2013, the Office issued a final rule establishing
filing fees under STELA. See Copyright Office Fees:
Cable and Satellite Statement of Account Fees, 78
FR 71498 (Nov. 29, 2013) (to be codified at 37 CFR
pt. 201), available at https://www.copyright.gov/
docs/newfees/.
6 17 U.S.C. 708(b)(1).
E:\FR\FM\24MRR1.SGM
24MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 56 / Monday, March 24, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
reasonable costs incurred by the
Copyright Office for . . . [such
services], plus a reasonable inflation
adjustment to account for any estimated
increase in costs.’’ 7 Finally, Section
708(b) mandates that the ‘‘[f]ees [so]
established . . . shall be fair and
equitable and give due consideration to
the objectives of the copyright
system.’’ 8
Additionally, when assessing fees for
providing services under the Freedom of
Information Act (‘‘FOIA’’), the Office
considers Office of Management and
Budget (‘‘OMB’’) guidelines that explain
the methodology for setting such fees.
Pursuant to Section 708, the Office
commenced its most recent cost study
in October 2011. The Office began its
work by compiling preliminary fee and
service data from fiscal 2011 and
followed this initial research with
formal public outreach.
On January 24, 2012, the Office
published a Notice of Inquiry (‘‘NOI’’) 9
seeking comments on the following two
questions: (1) With respect to the
standard 10 registration application fee,
whether special consideration should be
provided to individual author-claimants
registering a single work; and (2)
whether the Office should expand,
improve, or add to its offerings,
including, for example, additional
expedited services and fee options.
The Office received ten comments in
response to the initial inquiry.11 A
majority of the comments supported
special consideration for authorclaimants registering a single work.
Other comments discussed potential
additional services.12
7 Id.
section 708(b)(2).
section 708(b)(4).
9 Copyright Office Fees, 77 FR 3506 (Jan. 24,
2012).
10 The Office previously referred to the most
common registration filings (including for single
authors claiming single works) as ‘‘basic’’
applications and registrations. The Office recently
began using the term ‘‘standard’’ so it could
differentiate between the newly introduced single
author/single work offering—which the Office
refers to as the ‘‘single application’’ option—and
other traditional ‘‘basic’’ registrations, which it now
refers to as ‘‘standard.’’
11 The comments can be viewed on the Copyright
Office Web site at https://www.copyright.gov/docs/
newfees/.
12 While the NOI requested comments on
additional categories of services, and the Office may
continue to explore these issues, at present it lacks
sufficient information to proceed with the potential
expansion of its special handling or expedited
services. In addition, the NOI garnered a number of
proposals that the Office appreciates but that could
not be addressed solely in the context of a fee study,
including: Whether photographers could pay a flat
fee for registration of photographs in the context of
a business-to-business submission model; whether
copyright registration certificates and/or recorded
documents could be made available online for free;
and whether the Office should accept deposits of
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
8 Id.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:35 Mar 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
After reviewing the initial comments
from the NOI and the data from fiscal
2011, the Office published a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (‘‘NPR’’) on
March 28, 2012.13 In the NPR, the Office
set forth a proposed fee schedule, along
with its reasoning. The NPR reviewed
potential fee changes in four categories:
(1) Registration, recordation, and related
service fees; (2) other service fees; (3)
Licensing Division fees; and (4) FOIA
fees.14 The Office explained that, for
most of the fees, it had calculated its
costs based on traditional methodology
using an activity-based costing process
to determine the full cost of each Office
service.15 The Office used OMB
guidelines to determine proposed FOIA
fees. Proposed fees for Licensing
Division services were based either on
a separate cost study that addressed the
budget and expenditures of the
Licensing Division or, in the case of
Licensing Division services that parallel
other services in the Office, were based
on the cost study covering Office
services.
The NPR proposed that the Office
continue to offer both paper and
electronic registration options for
standard registration claims and
continue to charge a higher fee for paper
forms, which are less efficient than
electronic forms for both the Office and
applicants.16 The Office also proposed
offering a discounted registration fee for
single authors who file an online claim
for a single work that is not a work
made for hire.17 Referencing its
obligation to consider the objectives of
the copyright system, the Office noted
the importance of independent authors’
contributions to the nation’s economy
and to the Library of Congress’s
collections.18 It also noted that many
who commented on the NOI supported
a lower fee in such situations.19
The NPR proposed the following fees
for standard registration claims: $100 for
paper applications (up from $65); and
$65 for other electronic claims (up from
$35). Additionally, the Office
recommended a fee of $45 for the new
works in electronic formats that might be
insufficient for the Library’s ‘‘best edition’’
requirement.
13 Copyright Office Fees, 77 FR 18742 (Mar. 28,
2012).
14 Some of the fees discussed in the NPR,
including various service fees, Licensing Division
fees, and FOIA fees, are set by the Office pursuant
to its authority under Section 708(a) rather than
through the Section 708(b) process, and hence were
not discussed in the proposed schedule submitted
to Congress.
15 77 FR at 18743.
16 Id. 18743.
17 Id.
18 Id.
19 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
15911
category of single authors filing online
claims for single works not made for
hire.20 In this regard, it should be noted
that the $35 online application fee
initiated in 2009 was discounted to
encourage electronic registrations. Prior
to that, the fee for standard applications
had been universally set at $45. The
Office also proposed raising the fees
applicable to group registrations,
including for groups of published
photographs.21
The NPR also proposed new fees for
renewal forms. The Office proposed
reducing renewal fees from $115 to
$100.22 Similarly, the Office proposed
lowering the fee for filing a Renewal
Addendum, the necessary filing for
renewal when standard registration for
the work was not made during the
original term, from $220 to $100.23 The
Office proposed these reductions
because renewals are no longer required
to secure the full term of copyright
protection and it is not feasible to
attempt full cost recovery.24 The NPR
noted that setting a fee ‘‘to recover full
cost would be prohibitive and negate
the goals of the Office in encouraging
registration of these older claims, many
of which may still be commercially
viable, and incorporating these claims
into the public record.’’ 25
Additionally, the NPR discussed
raising fees for other Office services. It
proposed raising the basic recordation
fee from $105 to $120 and the fee for
each additional ten titles recorded from
$30 to $35.26 The Office suggested these
increases because, on the whole, it has
not recovered the cost of processing
recordations in recent years.27 The
Office further recommended increased
fees for certification services and
issuance of receipts for deposits under
17 U.S.C. 407.28 The Office also
proposed raising the fee for search
reports prepared from Office records to
$200 per hour with a two-hour
minimum.29
The NPR discussed potential changes
to the Office’s service fees, which
include fees for expedited service (or
‘‘special handling’’), secure test
processing, requests to reconsider
rejections of claims, and reproduction of
Office records, among other things. The
Office proposed increasing the fees for
many of these services, with many of
20 Id.
21 Id.
18744.
22 Id.
23 Id.
24 Id.
25 Id.
26 Id.
27 Id.
28 Id.
29 Id.
E:\FR\FM\24MRR1.SGM
24MRR1
15912
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 56 / Monday, March 24, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
these proposals reflecting cost increases.
The Office, however, did not propose
increased fees for all services (e.g.,
photocopying fees), and recommended
that some fees be lowered.30
Regarding expedited handling, the
NPR noted that the proposed cost
increase reflected inflationary changes
and that the Office declined to add
additional expedited handling
categories at this time.31 The NPR also
stated that the fees for secure test
processing should be increased because
the review process could include one or
more staff members and thus be quite
labor intensive.32 Finally, the NPR
explained that, while the Office was not
proposing an increase in the fees for
requests for reconsideration of rejected
claims, it did propose that each request
be limited to a single claim.33
The NPR also proposed new fees for
filing Notices of Intent under Section
115 of the Copyright Act. The Office
accepts Notices of Intent when a user
cannot serve the requisite notice of use
of a musical work on the copyright
owner pursuant to Section 115 because
Office records do not reflect the owner’s
identity and address.34 Recently, there
has been an exponential expansion of
these notices due to the increased use of
musical works by online services.35 The
Office thus is developing an electronic
filing system for these notices and, as
part of its study, undertook to determine
updated filing fees for Notices of
Intent.36 Based on the Office’s study, it
proposed a fee of $75 for a notice with
a single title, and for notices
incorporating additional titles, a fee of
$20 per ten additional titles submitted
on paper and $10 per one hundred
additional titles submitted
electronically.37
Finally, the NPR addressed fees for
responding to FOIA requests. The Office
noted that it has not adjusted its FOIA
fees since 1999. Following the OMB
guidelines, which specify that FOIA fees
should be established using direct costs,
the Office proposed fees as follows: (1)
For searches conducted by
administrative staff, $15 for the first half
hour and $7.50 for each additional
fifteen minutes; and (2) for searches
provided by professional staff, $35 for
the first half hour and $17.50 for each
additional fifteen minutes.38 Similarly,
the Office proposed adopting new fees
30 Id.
31 Id.
for reviewing the documents at the same
rates as those proposed for a FOIA
search by administrative and
professional staff, although the fees for
reviewing the documents would be
based on fifteen-minute increments and
without a minimum fee.39 Finally, the
Office proposed to eliminate the
separate FOIA fee for a copy of a
certificate of copyright registration and
the separate FOIA fee for certification
services, currently referenced in 37 CFR
203.6(b)(1), (4), respectively, as those
fees are to be assessed in accordance
with the fees for those services as
provided in the Office’s general fee
schedule.40
The Office received 138 comments in
response to the NPR. Some of the
commenters requested that the Office
expand the definition of single
claimant/single author, review the
renewal fees, and look to discount bulk
registrations. The majority, however,
expressed concerns about the proposed
fee increases generally. The comments
came from a wide range of stakeholders,
including photographers, visual artists,
several major associations, and others,
among them the American Association
of Independent Music (‘‘A2IM’’),
Association of American Publishers,
ProQuest, EMI CMG Publishing,
Graphic Artists Guild, American
Photographic Artists, and the Copyright
Alliance.
Some of the comments focused on
authors’ financial challenges and their
difficulty in shouldering higher costs.
For example, A2IM argued that ‘‘[t]he
combination of dedicated anti-piracy
resources and regulatory/judicial
resources now required of our members
to defend their businesses are resources
that our [small and medium sized
enterprises] simply do not have the
financial means or administrative means
to meet.’’ 41 Similarly, the American
Society of Media Photographers and
Professional Photographers of America
claimed that ‘‘proposed fee increases
would be catastrophic for working
photographers and would drastically
reduce the frequency of their copyright
registrations,’’ which would be
‘‘devastating to photographers and
detrimental to the public record, users
of photographs, and the Copyright
Office.’’ 42 Some of these comments
specified the potential harm in raising
group registration rates for published
photographs, noting that ‘‘a price
18745.
32 Id.
33 Id.
39 Id.
40 Id.
34 17
U.S.C. 115(b).
35 77 FR at 18745.
36 Id. 18745–46.
37 Id. 18746.
38 Id.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:35 Mar 21, 2014
41 Comments of the Am. Ass’n of Independent
Music (‘‘A2IM’’) at 1 (May 3, 2012).
42 Joint Comments of Am. Soc’y of Media
Photographers & Prof’l Photographers of Am. at 2
(May 14, 2012).
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
increase that nearly doubles the cost of
group registration for photographers
appears to fly in the face of the
Copyright Office’s mission to increase
participation in the registration
process.’’ 43
After carefully considering its costs
and the comments in response to the
NPR, on November 14, 2013, the Office
submitted a proposed fee schedule to
Congress. The schedule addressed those
fees authorized by Section 708(a)(1)–(9),
including fees for registration and
recordation, and its recommendations
are followed in this notice and final
rule. By statute, Congress has 120 days
to enact a law disapproving the Office’s
proposed fee schedule; if it does not, the
Register may institute the proposed fees
in a final rule.44 Now that 120 days have
elapsed without the enactment of
contrary legislation, the Office is hereby
providing notice of the new fee
schedule, to go into effect on May 1,
2014. This final rule also sets forth fees
for other additional Office services that
the Register is authorized to establish
through its rulemaking authority
without the need to submit them to
Congress.45
II. Fee Setting Methodology
In conducting its fee study, the Office
considered established accounting
procedures used by other governmental
entities, including the Federal
Accounting Standards Advisory Board’s
(‘‘FASAB’s’’) guidelines for determining
the full cost of federal agency program
activities 46 and the OMB’s Circular A–
25 Revised: User Charge 47 document
regarding costing guidelines and
establishing user fees.48
The Office looked primarily to two
models to evaluate its costs, namely the
additive and activity-based methods.
43 Id.
3.
U.S.C. 708(b)(5).
45 See id. section 708. The fees set in 37 CFR
201.3(e)(6) and (7) (the STELA implementation fees)
went into effect on January 1, 2014. They are
included in the fee schedule set forth in this Final
Rule for ease of insertion into the Code of Federal
Regulations.
46 This includes FASAB’s Managerial Cost
Accounting Concepts and Standards for the Federal
Government, which promotes activity-based costing
for calculating the cost of providing services. See
Office of Mgmt. & Budget, Statement #4/Managerial
Cost Accounting Concepts and Standards for the
Federal Government (July 31, 1995), https://
www.fasab.gov/pdffiles/sffas-4.pdf.
47 See Office of Mgmt. & Budget, Circular No. A–
25 Revised, https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/
circulars_a025.
48 Among other things, Circular A–25 provides
that services with a broad-reaching benefit generally
need not recover their full costs, whereas special
services, i.e., those that provide a particular benefit
to a particular customer, may recover more than
their full cost. The excess revenue collected from
special services fees can offset losses accruing from
other fees that may not recover their full cost.
44 17
E:\FR\FM\24MRR1.SGM
24MRR1
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 56 / Monday, March 24, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
The vast majority of costs were assessed
using the activity-based method. Under
this approach, the Office calculated how
much each service cost the Office to
provide after reviewing both the direct
and indirect costs in fiscal 2011. Section
115 filings, which are separately
administered by the Licensing Division,
and Section 407 receipts, a low-volume
service that could not be properly
considered through the activity-based
model, were evaluated using an additive
methodology, which assessed staff time
devoted to particular tasks. FOIA fees as
well were reviewed based on the
additive methodology.
Unlike earlier cost studies, to better
capture the costs of its services, the
Office included some costs that had
previously been excluded, including
Office of the General Counsel’s
regulatory activities, which support fee
services, and Public Information Office
time spent answering registrationrelated questions. As in previous
studies, the study continued to exclude
costs associated with the policy and
international programs, mandatory
deposit program, and programs
dedicated to providing general
education and information to the public.
These exclusions generally relate to staff
that work primarily in the Office of the
General Counsel, the Office of Policy
and International Affairs, the
Publications Section, the Public
Information Office, and the Copyright
Acquisitions Division.
Against this backdrop, the Office
undertook a comprehensive review of
the fees associated with its various
activities. Most copyright processes are
labor intensive and staff activity costs
can be linked to the various fee services.
Under an activity-based approach,
personnel resource costs are assigned to
specific activities. For example,
mailroom personnel in the Receipt
Analysis and Control Division are
assigned to the activity called ‘‘sort
mail’’ (among others), and a
determination is made as to the
proportion of their time spent on that
activity. In the case of personnel costs
associated with administration at the
division level, costs are apportioned
among the activities within the division.
Office-wide administrative costs, such
as the Register’s time and that of her
administrative staff, are similarly
apportioned. In this way, the Office can
capture direct and indirect personnel
costs associated with each activity.
The next step in the process is the
assignment of non-personnel costs. If
non-personnel costs are associated with
just one fee service, they were directly
assigned to that activity. For example,
the maintenance costs for the eCO
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:35 Mar 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
system, the online copyright registration
system, are assigned directly to the
Copyright Technology Office activity
eCO. Other non-personnel costs
associated with multiple services were
allocated proportionately among all
relevant activities. Once all nonpersonnel costs are assigned to an
activity, those costs are incorporated
into the overall costs for the various fee
services. Using an earlier example, the
sort mail activity was considered a cost
for each fee service that is dependent
upon incoming mail including, for
example, paper registrations, renewals,
and document recordations.
Using these cost determinations as a
starting point, the Office considered
statutory fee-setting requirements and
economic factors, including changes in
cost due to inflation. Economic factors,
including price elasticity,49 also played
a role in setting the Office’s fees. The
Office considers elasticity when
assessing whether fee receipts will
recover the appropriate percentage of
costs, both individually and
collectively. The Office has determined
that a majority of its fees are price
elastic and that it experiences a
reduction in demand when fees are
increased. While external factors, such
as the economy, also influence filing
volume, there is a demonstrated inverse
relationship between the increase in
fees and the number of claims filed.
Registration filing and document
recordation are two of the most heavily
used services, generating well over 90%
of the Office’s fee receipts. These two
categories of fees are quite vulnerable to
a decline in demand as fees increase.
For example, in the months following a
recent fee increase more modest than
the one proposed here, registration
filings dropped as much as 17%.50
Therefore, the Office expects a rather
significant short-term decrease in filings
upon the implementation of the new
fees, which should lessen as filers adjust
to the fees. Recognizing this fact, the
Office must set fees such that each new
fee recovers a reasonable percentage of
the cost of processing the claim but does
not drive down usership to a point
where overall receipts decrease.
Additionally, the Office must ensure
that fee receipts are sufficient to sustain
the Office’s operations, taking into
account fluctuations in filing volumes,
49 Elasticity is the term used to ‘‘measure[ ] how
much the quantity demanded responds to a change
in price.’’ Joshua Gans, Stephen King, Robin
Stonecash, & N. Gregory Mankiw, Principles of
Economics 90 (5th ed. 2012) (defining price
elasticity).
50 Number based on the decline of registrations
after the introduction of new fees in fiscal year
2007.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
15913
whether brought on by increased fees
and/or other economic factors in the
marketplace. It is important that fee
receipts bring in enough revenue to
cover the greater part of the Office’s
operations annually and sustain a
reserve fund for use in the event of a
short-term budgetary shortfall.
The Office reviewed FOIA fees based
on the additive methodology and in
accordance with the OMB Uniform
Freedom of Information Act Fee
Schedule and Guidelines.51 The OMB
guidelines state that agencies such as
the Office may recoup the full allowable
direct costs they incur in responding to
FOIA requests. They also state that
agencies may establish separate rates for
searching records and reviewing
responsive records to determine issues
such as the applicability of an
exemption. The Office is thus adopting
a two-tiered fee structure for searches
and reviews to reflect the direct costs of
the service depending upon the level of
the personnel conducting the search.
Specifically, the Office is implementing
one set of fees for searches conducted by
professional staff and another set of fees
for searches conducted by
administrative staff.
Finally, the Office also took care to
consider the overall objectives of the
copyright system in developing its fee
schedule.
III. Final Regulation
Based on its study, the Office has
determined that some fees should
increase, some should decrease, and
some should remain the same. From
past experience, it is certain that any
increase in fees will result in fewer
claims, at least temporarily in the time
frame immediately following
implementation. It is anticipated,
however, that, at the fee levels
proposed, revenues lost due to a
decrease in the number of claims will be
offset by revenues generated from the
higher fees and ultimately result in an
increase in overall fee receipts. The
Office estimates that revenues generated
by the proposed fees will be roughly $28
million annually.
Below is a further explanation of the
Office’s final rule with respect to
particular fee categories.
a. Registration, Recordation, and
Related Services Fees
The Office is modifying several fees
relating to registration, recordation, and
associated services. Some of these
adjustments merely account for changes
to costs for existing services and the
Office’s overall level of cost recovery. In
51 52
E:\FR\FM\24MRR1.SGM
FR 10012 (Mar. 27, 1987).
24MRR1
15914
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 56 / Monday, March 24, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
the case of registration and other core
Office services, the fees also reflect the
public’s interest in a robust and accurate
record of copyright information,
including authorship, licensing
information, and public domain status.
Finally, in some cases, the Office is not
making a change, as there are certain
instances where the Office has
determined that no adjustment was
required.
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
i. Standard Registrations
• Fee for applications filed online to
increase from $35 to $55
• Fee for applications filed on paper to
increase from $65 to $85
The Office offers applicants two
options for filing standard applications:
(1) Electronic filing through the Office’s
eCO system; and (2) paper filing using
a traditional hard copy application.52
Currently, the vast majority of
applicants use the online filing option;
the Office receives approximately 91%
of new copyright claims through eCO.
Electronic filings cost the Office less to
process than paper applications.
Additionally, online applications are
attractive because, on average, the Office
requires between two and five months
to complete most claims filed
electronically, versus five to eleven
months to complete most claims filed
on a paper application.
In reviewing its registration fees, the
Office closely examined its costs and
the degree to which they are recovered
under the existing fee structure. Using
an average weighted by claim volume,53
the Office recovered only 65% of the
cost to process an online claim and 63%
of the cost to process paper applications
during fiscal 2011. These figures
support the Office’s proposal to increase
fees for both options, in order to recover
a larger percentage of the Office’s costs.
It is estimated that the new fees
(including the single author/single work
fee discussed below) would recover
73% of the costs of processing
electronic claims and 68% of the costs
of processing paper applications.
The Office recognizes the value of
paper applications for those applicants
who do not have adequate access to the
Office’s online system or who have
other reasons to prefer paper filings. At
52 The Office eliminated Form CO in the summer
of 2012, thus leaving only two methods for filing
a standard registration claim. See Discontinuance of
Form CO in Registration Practices, 77 FR 18705
(U.S. Copyright Office Mar. 28, 2012);
Discontinuance of Form CO in Registration
Practices Correction, 77 FR 29988 (U.S. Copyright
Office Apr. 9, 2012).
53 For example, claims for LIT were weighted
more heavily than claims for VA in calculating
average volume because the Office receives more
LIT claims than VA claims.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:35 Mar 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
the same time, the substantially higher
costs of processing paper applications as
compared to the more efficient
electronic process continues to justify a
higher fee for paper applications.
Accordingly, the Office will continue to
charge different filing fees for these
applications. For electronic applications
for standard registration claims, the
Office is raising the current fee from $35
to $55. Though this is a $20 increase
over the current fee, as mentioned
above, the current fee of $35 was
lowered from the then-existing fee of
$45 after the Office’s launch of its eCO
system in order to incentivize electronic
filings. The final $55 fee is thus only
$10 more than the Office’s prior nondiscounted filing fee. Moreover, the $55
fee is less than the $65 fee that was
proposed in the NPR, thus responding
to public comments concerned with the
amount of the increase for electronic
filing.54
The Office is increasing the existing
$65 fee for paper applications to $85.
This change will provide the Office
more cost recovery for the inefficiencies
of paper filings. The Office notes that
the fee of $85 is significantly lower than
the $100 fee proposed in the NPR. The
revised fee accounts for the Office’s
consideration of public comments
arguing that a $100 fee was unduly
harsh.55 After reviewing the comments,
the Office concluded that, while budget
and cost considerations mandate an
increase, the increase should be more
modest in light of the significant public
interest in registration, including
through a paper-based process.
ii. Single Author, Single Work
Applications Filed Online
• Fee for single registration application
filed online by a single author for a
single work not made for hire to
remain at $35
54 See, e.g., Comments of the Ass’n of Am.
Publishers at 2 (‘‘[T]he pending proposal to nearly
double current online registration fees would, if
adopted, lead many [publishers], especially but not
exclusively the small or non-profit publishers, to
reevaluate the categories of works currently being
registered with the objective of reducing their
registration costs.’’) (emphasis in original).
55 See, e.g., Joint Comments of Am. Soc’y of
Media Photographers & Prof’l Photographers of Am.
at 3 (May 14, 2012) (‘‘Although we recognize the
Copyright Office’s desire to encourage registrants to
use the eCO registration platform over Form VA, we
believe that nearly doubling the cost for those adept
at using Form VA would create a significant
deterrent to registration in its entirety.’’); Comments
of ArtistsUndertheDome.org at 2 (May 14, 2012)
(‘‘The . . . $100 [fee] is unacceptable . . . those
who use paper filing systems tend to be older, do
not have access to the internet or fast internet
services such as broadband, and/or they tend to be
lower income. . . . These proposed increased fees
will mean less artists will be able to afford to
register their copyright(s).’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
As discussed above, the Office is
committed to maintaining an affordable
copyright registration system and
understands that works of independent
creators fuel the nation’s economy and
are critical to the Library of Congress’
collections. Moreover, if individual
authors do not register and are not part
of the public database, they—more than
any other group of copyright owners—
may be difficult to find.
In making the decision to add a new
registration category for individual
authors, the Office took into account a
large number of public comments
advocating for a lower fee. Commenters
noted, as did the Office, that such
applications are easier to process, that
registration provides important
remedies for the author, and that
registration benefits the public by
creating a more robust public record. As
one commenter noted, ‘‘[Office]
[s]ervices which facilitate individual
author-claimants registering a single
work that is not a work made for hire
. . . promote and protect authorship
and potentially sharpen the chain of
title documentation. . . .’’ 56 Those
supporting a reduced fee for single
author/single work claims came from a
variety of backgrounds, including the
performing and visual arts. The Office
believes this option will serve a wide
range of authors.57
iii. Group Registration, Mask Work, and
Vessel Hull Fees
• Fees for registration of a claim in a
group of contributions to a periodical
(Form GR/CP) or database updates to
increase from $65 to $85
• Fees for group registration of
published photographs or registration
of automated databases that
predominately consist of photographs
and updates thereto: for paper filings,
fee will remain at $65 and for
electronic filings, fee will increase
from $35 to $55
• Fees for registration of a claim in a
group of serials (Form SE/Group) (per
issue, minimum of two issues) to
remain at $25
• Fees for registration of a claim in a
group of daily newspapers and
qualified newsletters (Form G/DN) to
remain at $80
56 Comments of Indep. Film & Television Alliance
at 1 (Feb. 23, 2012).
57 After proposing this option, the Office
published an additional Federal Register notice
explaining that the single author/single claim
application was available for use on the Office’s
eCO system. See Single Application Option, 78 FR
38843 (U.S. Copyright Office June 28, 2013). In the
past several months, applicants have begun to use
the new procedure, allowing the Office to assess
how best to implement the process and assist
individual authors.
E:\FR\FM\24MRR1.SGM
24MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 56 / Monday, March 24, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
• Fees for registration of a claim in a
mask work (Form MW) to increase
from $105 to $120
• Fees for registration of a claim in a
vessel hull (Form D/VH) to increase
from $220 to $400
The Office has determined that the
fees for registration of some but not all
types of group claims should be
adjusted.
The fee to register a claim in a group
of contributions to a periodical—a
paper-based process that is laborintensive—will increase from $65 to
$85.
In the case of both serials and
newspapers, where the Office’s cost
recovery currently appears adequate, the
Office is not making an adjustment.
Although the NPR had indicated that
these two latter categories of fees would
also be subject to an increase, upon
further analysis, the Office believes that
the current fees remain appropriate.
Similarly, for paper applications for
groups of published photographs and
for automated databases that
predominately consist of photographs
and updates thereto, the Office is
making no increase. Despite its initial
proposal to increase this fee, the Office
now believes it should remain at $65.
Comments received in response to the
Office’s initial fee proposal demonstrate
that photographers face particular
challenges with the registration process
due to the large quantities of works they
often create in brief periods of time.58 In
light of these conditions, the Office is
continuing to study how best to
facilitate photographers’ registration of
their works. Thus, while the Office may
alter the fee structure for registration of
groups of published photographs in the
future, the fee for paper applications
will not change now.
For electronic applications for these
types of photograph claims, however,
the fee will increase from $35 to $55, so
it is consistent with the fees for other
electronic applications.59
Finally, the mask work and vessel
hull registration fees are being increased
to recover a greater percentage of the
costs of processing these claims.
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
iv. Other Registration Fees
• Fee for registration of a claim in a
restored copyright (Form GATT) to
increase from $65 to $85
58 See, e.g., Joint Comments of the Am. Soc’y of
Media Photographers & Prof’l Photographers of Am.
(May 4, 2012); Comments of Nat’l Press
Photographers Ass’n (May 14, 2012).
59 Although both the NPR and the proposed
schedule submitted to Congress tacitly subsumed
these electronic group photograph applications
under ‘‘standard’’ applications filed online, because
they are not truly ‘‘standard,’’ this final rule
clarifies their separate status as group applications.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:35 Mar 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
• Fee for registration of a correction or
amplification to a claim (Form CA) to
increase from $100 to $130
After reviewing its costs, the Office
determined that current fees do not
offset a sufficient percentage of the
Office’s costs in accepting registrations
for paper-based claims, which include
claims in restored copyrights (Form
GATT). In addition, it concluded that
the current fee for filing a registration of
a correction or amplification to a claim
(Form CA), another paper-based
process, was insufficient. Paper-based
processes are considerably less efficient
than electronic registration.
Accordingly, the Office is increasing
both of these fees.
v. Renewal Fees
• Fee for renewal application to
decrease from $115 to $100
• Fee for renewal addendum to
decrease from $220 to $100
The Office is making these reductions
due to the unique nature of renewals in
the history of copyright law and recent
experiences in reviewing renewal
documents. Under prior law, certain
copyright claims had to be renewed
with the Office in their twenty-eighth
year of protection to remain valid for the
remainder of their terms. The current
Act changed the renewal requirement; a
renewal is no longer necessary to secure
the full term of copyright protection.
Nonetheless, for pre-1978 works,
renewal registration still offers certain
benefits for the owner and the public.
There has been a dramatic decrease in
renewal registrations over the past seven
years, likely due to the change in law
and increased fees associated with
renewal. In this same time frame, some
of those who may have benefited from
filing renewal registrations have instead
mistakenly attempted to file initial
claims of registration. Dwindling and
incorrect renewal registrations diminish
the public record, thus harming the
Office’s overall mission to serve as a
robust repository of copyright
information.
The Office’s decision to lower the
renewal fee to $100 should encourage
the filing of more renewal claims.
Similarly, the fee for a renewal
addendum, an additional requirement
when standard registration for the work
was not made during the original term,
will also be lower. A renewal addendum
documents the copyright status of a
work, thus allowing users to know
whether the work is under copyright
protection. The Office believes that the
lower fees for renewals and renewal
addendums strike the appropriate
balance between cost recovery and the
public record.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
15915
vi. Recordation of Documents
• Fee for recordation of a document to
remain at $105
• Fee for recording groups of up to ten
additional titles associated with that
document to increase from $30 to $35
In the NPR, the Office proposed
increases to its recordation fees to help
the Office better recover costs in this
area. The Office’s eCO system permits
electronic registration of copyright
claims. By contrast, the Office’s
recordation system—which is not part
of eCO—remains a largely paper-driven
process. Although the Office recovers
the cost of recording simple documents,
it has been unable to recover the full
cost associated with processing more
substantial documents that include
multiple titles of copyrighted works.
The titles, which can number in the
thousands, must each be individually
indexed.
Recordation of copyright transfers and
other copyright-related documents is a
voluntary process but critical to
maintaining a public record of copyright
ownership. The proposed increase to
$35 for each ten additional titles
associated with a recorded document
will allow for greater cost recovery in
the case of more complicated filings but
should not be unduly burdensome for
filers. At the same time, upon further
analysis of its costs, the Office has
determined that it is not necessary to
change the existing fee of $105 for its
basic recordation service, where it is
already achieving full recovery.
The Office is currently considering
how to migrate its recordation function
to an electronic system, a process which
may require both statutory changes and
technological upgrades, and will
continue to evaluate its recordation fees
as that process moves forward.60
vii. Certification Fees
• Fee for issuance of additional
certificate of registration to increase
from $35 to $40
• Fee for certification of other Office
records, including search reports, to
increase from $165 to $200 per hour
Based on the cost study, the Office is
enacting a modest increase to the fee for
issuance of additional certificates of
registration. Even though this could
yield fee receipts slightly above the
Office’s costs of providing additional
certificates, the limited increase is
appropriate under the fee-setting
principles articulated in OMB’s Circular
A–25 because the service in question
60 The Office is looking at this issue in several
ways, including through stakeholder meetings,
technology assessments, and scholarly analysis as
to the recordation requirements of title 17.
E:\FR\FM\24MRR1.SGM
24MRR1
15916
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 56 / Monday, March 24, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
benefits only the individual requester
and any excess fee receipts can be used
to subsidize other services with lower
cost recovery. Moreover, at $40, the new
fee remains reasonable for requesters.
With respect to other types of Office
records and search reports, as in past
cost studies, the Office has determined
that fee receipts cover less than the
actual costs of providing certification
services. The Office recognizes,
however, that users need to be able to
obtain certified copies of Office records
for legal and other purposes. Although
the Office is proposing an increase in its
fee for these additional certification
services to $200 per hour, it has been
mindful of its duty to balance the goal
of cost recovery against the need for
access to reliable public records. It is
therefore establishing this fee below full
cost recovery.
viii. Search Reports and Records
Retrieval
• Fee for reference search reports (other
than Licensing Division reports) to
increase from $165 to $200 per hour,
with a two-hour minimum
• Fee for estimate of search fee to
increase from $115 to $200 (applied
against the search charges)
• Fee for retrieval of in-process or
completed Copyright Office records or
other materials to increase from $165
to $200 for both paper records (per
hour, one hour minimum) and digital
records (per hour, half hour
minimum, quarter hour increments)
The Office’s imposition of a two hour
minimum charge in 2009 for search
reports prepared from Office records
(other than those prepared from
Licensing Division records) resulted in
a substantial increase in cost recovery.
Nevertheless, as in past cost studies, the
Office has found that the fee covers only
a portion of the actual cost of providing
the reference search service. To achieve
full cost recovery would render the cost
too high for the average user as a
practical matter. A very high fee also
prejudices users who, for legal reasons,
are required to have the Office conduct
a search.
Accordingly, the Office is
implementing a fee increase from $165
to $200 per hour for search reports,
again with a two hour minimum (other
than for reports prepared from Licensing
Division records). To permit additional
cost recovery, the Office will also
increase the estimate of search fee—
which covers the cost of estimating the
total fees for a search and is credited
against the hourly search fee—from
$115 to $200.
Finally, the fee increase for retrieval
of in-process or completed Copyright
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:35 Mar 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
Office records or other Copyright Office
materials is consistent with the Office’s
need to more fully recover the cost of its
services.
ix. Other Services
• Fee for preregistration of certain
unpublished works to be increased
from $115 to $140
• Fee for recordation of a designation of
an agent under Section 512(c)(2) to
remain at $105, with the fee for
additional names (per group of 1 to
10) to be increased from $30 to $35
• Fee for issuance of a receipt for a
Section 407 deposit to remain at $30
The fee increases for preregistration of
certain unpublished works and for
recordation of additional names (in
groups of 1 to 10) in conjunction with
the designation of an agent to receive
notices of infringement under Section
512(c)(2) of title 17 (codifying Section
202 of title II of the Digital Millennium
Copyright Act (‘‘DMCA’’)) were set forth
in the NPR and did not elicit any
comments, so the Office is
implementing these fee increases as
proposed. The Office believes that the
current fees applicable to recording the
designation of a DMCA agent itself and
for issuance of a receipt for a Section
407 deposit are adequate, so these will
remain unchanged.61
b. Special Services Fees
i. Special Handling
• Fee for special handling of
registration claims to increase from
$760 to $800, with the handling fee
for each non-special handling claim
using the same deposit to remain at
$50
• Fee for special handling of document
recordation to increase from $480 to
$550
• Fee for special handling of a search
report to increase from $280 to $300
per hour (for up to two hours) 62
• Fee for special handling of retrieval,
certification, and copying requests to
increase from $265 to $305 per hour
The surcharges assessed for obtaining
expedited registration, recordation and
other services reflect a premium
payment for the value of the expedited
61 The Office notes that it is currently engaged in
efforts to convert its DMCA agent registration
system to a fully electronic process. The
introduction of a new system will likely result in
future adjustment of the fees applicable to
recordations under Section 512(c)(2).
62 This service is currently described as
‘‘expedited search report’’ and priced at $445 per
hour, a number that combines the basic search
report fee with the surcharge for expedited service.
In this final rule, the Office has separated the two
fees, so that the new $300 hourly fee represents
only the surcharge on top of the new $200 hourly
fee for the search report.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
service to the individual requester. The
Office believes that increases to these
fees are both reasonable and justified in
light of the diversion of Office resources
that is required to provide this type of
specialized handling for individual
customers.
ii. Secure Test Processing
• Fee for secure test processing to
increase from $165 to $250 per staff
member per hour
The Office provides specialized
services for secure test processing,
specifically a private review of the full
deposit of a secure test that involves a
comparison of the deposit with
identifying material that does not
disclose confidential content. The Office
is implementing the above fee increase
based on the cost of supplying this
service. The charge will be applied per
staff member because two or more staff
members may be required to expedite
the review of the deposits.
iii. Requests for Reconsideration of
Rejections of Claims (Appeals)
• Fee for first request for
reconsideration to remain at $250 (but
the option of adding claims beyond
those in the subject registration is no
longer available)
• Fee for second request for
reconsideration to remain at $500 (but
the option of adding claims beyond
those in the subject registration is no
longer available)
The Office is not changing the fees for
the first and second reconsideration of
a single claim, in part because the Office
recognizes that an increase in fees may
impede a claimant from pursuing
administrative review of a rejected
claim. The Office is, however,
eliminating its practice of allowing
applicants to include multiple related
claims that were not covered by a single
application in a single request for
reconsideration. Previously, the Office
allowed applicants to consolidate
requests to reconsider works from
different applications if the works were
related. It is not, however, necessarily
more efficient to review multiple
claims, because each claim must still be
analyzed separately. Thus, the Office is
making a change to the process so that
the fee for a request for reconsideration
will cover only the work or works
included in a single original claim for
registration.
iv. Deposit Copies
• Fee for handling an extra deposit copy
for certification to increase from $45
to $50
E:\FR\FM\24MRR1.SGM
24MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 56 / Monday, March 24, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
• Fee for full-term retention of a
published deposit to increase from
$470 to $540
The Office believes that fees for
handling extra deposit copies for
certification and for full-term retention
of published deposits should be
increased to reflect the specialized
nature of these services, which benefit
individual customers.
v. Copying Fees
• Fee for black and white photocopies
on 81⁄2 x 11 paper to remain at $0.50
per page with a $12 minimum
• Fee for black and white photocopies
on 11 x 17 paper to remain at $1 per
page with a $12 minimum
• Fee for color photocopies on 81⁄2 x 11
paper to remain at $2 per page with
a $12 minimum
• Fee for color photocopies on 11 x 17
paper to remain at $4 per page with
a $12 minimum
• Fee for copies of audiocassettes and
videocassettes to remain at $75 for the
first 30 minutes and at $20 for each
additional fifteen-minute increment
• Fee for copies of CDs or DVDs to be
reduced from $100 to $30
• Fee for new service of copying to flash
drives to be established at $30
• Fee for copying to unsupported
formats and other copying of
materials by outside providers to be at
cost of provider
Based upon consultation with those
who provide copying services, the
Office finds that it is advisable to
maintain the current fees for most
copying services. The Office is,
however, reducing the fee for copying
CDs and DVDs due to lower copying
costs. Additionally, the fee for copying
to formats unsupported by the Office
will be what the provider charges the
Copyright Office. The Office no longer
directly handles photographs, slides, zip
drives, and floppy discs, so the fees for
copying in these formats will be
assessed at the cost of the provider.
Similarly, in the case of copies that the
Office must request from the Library of
Congress’s Duplication Services, the
Office will pass along the actual cost to
the customer.
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
vi. Other Special Services Fees
• Fee for service charge for deposit
account overdraft to increase from
$165 to $250
• Fee for service charge for dishonored
deposit account replenishment check
to increase from $85 to $100
• Fee for service charge for an
uncollectible or non-negotiable
payment to increase from $25 to $30
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:35 Mar 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
• Fee for service charge for Federal
Express mailing to increase from $40
to $45
• Fee for notice to libraries and archives
to remain at $50, with the fee for each
additional title to remain at $20
• Fee for the service charge for delivery
of documents via facsimile (per page,
seven-page maximum) to remain at $1
per page
The Office finds that it is appropriate
to raise fees for some other special
services in order to improve cost
recovery. Specifically, after reviewing
the costs of the above services, the
Office has determined these fees should
be raised except for fees for notices to
libraries and archives and those for
facsimile delivery services.
c. Licensing Division Fees
i. Recordation of a Notice of Intention
To Make and Distribute Phonorecords
Under Section 115
• Fee for filing a basic notice with a
single title to increase from $60 to $75
• Fee for paper filing of additional titles
to remain at $20 per set of ten titles
• Fee for electronic filing of additional
titles to be established at $10 per set
of one hundred titles
With the rise of digital services
offering expansive catalogs of music,
many more users seek to file notices of
intent to avail themselves of the Section
115 statutory license when they cannot
identify or locate the owners of
particular musical works in Office
records. In 2009, the Office responded
by adjusting its Section 115 filing fees
to accommodate the submission of
multiple titles at the same time. More
recently, the Office has initiated a test
of an electronic filing option to allow for
more cost-effective processing of
digitally submitted notices with
multiple titles. While the new fees
reflect the higher costs of handling
single-title notices, they also take into
consideration the cost savings
associated with electronic submission of
multiple titles by adopting a
substantially lower per-title fee for such
submissions.
ii. Recordation of Licensing Agreements
and Contracts
• Filing fee for recordation of a
licensing agreement pursuant to 17
U.S.C. 118 to remain at $140
• Fee for recordation of certain
contracts by cable television systems
located outside the forty-eight
contiguous states pursuant to 17
U.S.C. 111 to remain at $50
The Office determined that it was not
necessary to increase the fees for
recordation of a licensing agreement
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
15917
under Section 118 or for recordation of
certain contracts by cable systems as
provided under Section 111, so these
fees will remain at their current levels.
iii. Other Licensing Division Fees
• Fee for statement of account
amendment (cable television systems
and satellite carriers, 17 U.S.C. 111
and 119; digital audio recording
devices or media, 17 U.S.C. 1003) to
increase from $100 to $150
• Fee for notice of digital transmission
of sound recording (Sections 112, 114)
to increase from $25 to $40
• Fee for amended notice of digital
transmission of sound recording to
increase from $25 to $40
• Fee for search report prepared from
Licensing Division records to increase
from $165 to $200 per hour, with a
one-hour minimum
For search reports prepared from
Licensing Division records, while the
proposed hourly fee adjustment tracks
that for general Copyright Office search
reports, the Office believes that a one
hour (rather than two hour) minimum is
sufficient in the case of Licensing
records. A number of Licensing Division
searches are purely factual, for example,
due diligence searches to verify that
mandatory filings were made. Such
searches often can be conducted fairly
quickly and thus the Office has
determined that a one-hour minimum is
sufficient.
The fee increases for certain other
Licensing Division services listed above
were proposed in the NPR and received
no negative comments. The Office is
therefore implementing these increases
to achieve greater cost recovery.
d. FOIA Services Fees
• Fee for a search prepared by
administrative staff (per quarter hour
increment with a half hour minimum)
to change from $16.25 to $7.50
• Fee for a search prepared by
professional staff (per quarter hour
increment with a half hour minimum)
to change from $16.25 to $17.50
• Fee for a review of documents
performed by administrative staff, per
quarter hour, to be assessed at $7.50
an hour
• Fee for a review of documents
performed by professional staff, per
quarter hour, to be assessed at $17.50
an hour
As explained above, the Office looked
to OMB guidelines when setting its fees
for FOIA requests. Currently, the Office
charges an hourly fee for searches
related to such requests. The Office last
adjusted its FOIA fees in 1999.
The Office is implementing a fee
adjustment and a new schedule for
E:\FR\FM\24MRR1.SGM
24MRR1
15918
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 56 / Monday, March 24, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
assessing FOIA search fees and
reviewing the documents. OMB
guidelines allow agencies to set an
average fee based on the individuals
processing FOIA requests where there
are homogeneous classes of personnel
used to perform the required service
(i.e., identifiable classes of personnel
that have like characteristics—in this
case, all professional or all
administrative staff). The Office thus is
establishing two sets of review and
search fees: (1) One fee for those
services conducted at the technical or
administrative level; and (2) a higher fee
for those services conducted at the
professional level. These fees will be
charged in quarter hour increments,
with a minimum of a half hour for a
search to account for overhead. The
Office thus will charge $7.50 per quarter
hour increment for searches performed
by administrative staff, with a minimum
fee of $15 to cover the first half hour.
For searches performed by professional
staff, the Office will assess a fee of
$17.50 per quarter hour increment, with
a minimum fee of $35. The same fee
structure will apply to review services,
but with no minimum fee.63
Finally, as noted above, the Office is
revising two provisions of 37 CFR
203.6(b) to eliminate FOIA-specific fees
for obtaining copies of registration
certificates and for certification services
(currently referenced in 37 CFR
203.6(b)(1) and (4), respectively).
Pursuant to 37 CFR 203.6(a), the fees for
these services, which involve the public
records of the Copyright Office, are to be
assessed in accordance with the Office’s
general fee schedule. The Office
believes these changes will help to
avoid confusion about the applicable fee
when such services are provided in
connection with a FOIA request.
Final Rule
List of Subjects
§ 201.3 Fees for registration, recordation,
and related services, special services, and
services performed by the Licensing
Division.
37 CFR Part 201
Copyright, General provisions.
37 CFR Part 203
Copyright, Freedom of Information
Act: Policies and Procedures.
In consideration of the foregoing,
under the authority of 17 U.S.C. 702, the
U.S. Copyright Office amends 37 CFR
chapter II as follows:
CHAPTER II—U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE,
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
1. The heading of chapter II is revised
to read as set forth above.
■
PART 201—GENERAL PROVISIONS
2. The authority citation for part 201
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 702.
3. Revise § 201.3(c), (d), and (e) to read
as follows:
■
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Registration, recordation, and
related service fees. The Copyright
Office has established the following fees
for these services:
Fees
($)
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Registration, recordation and related services
(1) Registration of a standard claim in an original work of authorship:
Electronic filing:
(i) Single author, same claimant, one work, not for hire ......................................................................................................
(ii) All other filings ..................................................................................................................................................................
Paper Filing (Forms PA, SR, TX, VA, SE, SR) ...........................................................................................................................
(2) Registration of a claim in a group of contributions to periodicals (Form GR/CP) or database updates ......................................
(3) Registration for a group of published photographs, or an automated database that predominately consists of photographs
and updates thereto:
(i) Electronic filing .........................................................................................................................................................................
(ii) Paper filing ..............................................................................................................................................................................
(4) Registration of a renewal claim (Form RE):
(i) Claim without addendum .........................................................................................................................................................
(ii) Addendum (in addition to the fee for the claim) .....................................................................................................................
(5) Registration of a claim in a group of serials (Form SE/Group) (per issue, minimum 2 issues) ...................................................
(6) Registration of a claim in a group of daily newspapers and qualified newsletters (Form G/DN) .................................................
(7) Registration of a claim in a restored copyright (Form GATT) .......................................................................................................
(8) Preregistration of certain unpublished works .................................................................................................................................
(9) Registration of a correction or amplification to a claim (Form CA) ...............................................................................................
(10) Registration of a claim in a mask work (Form MW) ....................................................................................................................
(11) Registration of a claim in a vessel hull (Form D/VH) ..................................................................................................................
(12) Provision of an additional certificate of registration .....................................................................................................................
(13) Certification of other Copyright Office records, including search reports (per hour) ..................................................................
(14) Search report prepared from official records other than Licensing Division records (per hour, 2 hour minimum) ....................
Estimate of search fee (credited to search fee) ...........................................................................................................................
(15) Retrieval of in-process or completed Copyright Office records or other Copyright Office materials:
(i) Retrieval of paper records (per hour, 1 hour minimum) ..........................................................................................................
(ii) Retrieval of digital records (per hour, half hour minimum, quarter hour increments) ............................................................
(16) Recordation of document, including a notice of intention to enforce (single title) ......................................................................
Additional titles (per group of 1 to 10 titles) .................................................................................................................................
(17) Recordation of a designation of agent to receive notification of claimed infringements under § 512(c)(2) ................................
Additional names (per group of 1 to 10) ......................................................................................................................................
(18) Issuance of a receipt for a § 407 deposit ....................................................................................................................................
(d) Special Service Fees. The
Copyright Office has established the
applicability of FOIA review fees (currently
55
65
100
100
25
80
85
140
130
120
400
40
200
200
200
200
200
105
35
105
35
30
following fees for special services of the
Office:
63 In this regard, the Office notes that it is revising
the language of the provision concerning the
35
55
85
85
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:35 Mar 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
codified at 37 CFR 203.6(b)(7)) to more closely track
the language of the FOIA statute.
E:\FR\FM\24MRR1.SGM
24MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 56 / Monday, March 24, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Fees
($)
Special services
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Service charge for deposit account overdraft ..............................................................................................................................
Service charge for dishonored deposit account replenishment check ........................................................................................
Service charge for an uncollectible or non-negotiable payment .................................................................................................
Appeals:
(i) First appeal (per claim) ..........................................................................................................................................................
(ii) Second appeal (per claim) ....................................................................................................................................................
(5) Secure test processing charge (per staff member per hour) ......................................................................................................
(6) Copying of Copyright Office records by staff:
Photocopy (black & white, 81⁄2 x 11) (per page, minimum: $12) ..............................................................................................
Photocopy (black & white, 11 x 17) (per page, minimum: $12) ................................................................................................
Photocopy (color, 81⁄2 x 11) (per page, minimum: $12) ............................................................................................................
Photocopy (color, 11 x 17) (per page, minimum: $12) ..............................................................................................................
Audiocassette (first 30 minutes) .................................................................................................................................................
Additional 15 minute increments .........................................................................................................................................
Videocassette (first 30 minutes) .................................................................................................................................................
Additional 15 minute increments .........................................................................................................................................
CD or DVD .................................................................................................................................................................................
Flash drive ..................................................................................................................................................................................
Unsupported formats and other copying of materials by outside providers, at cost of provider ...............................................
(7) Special handling fee for a claim ..................................................................................................................................................
Handling fee for each non-special handling claim using the same deposit ..............................................................................
(8) Special handling fee for recordation of a document ....................................................................................................................
(9) Handling fee for extra deposit copy for certification ....................................................................................................................
(10) Full-term retention of a published deposit .................................................................................................................................
(11) Special handling of search report, per hour (for up to 2 hours) ................................................................................................
Additional hours of searching, per hour .....................................................................................................................................
(12) Special handling of retrieval, certification, and copying, per hour .............................................................................................
(13) Notice to libraries and archives .................................................................................................................................................
Each additional title ....................................................................................................................................................................
(14) Service charge for Federal Express mailing ..............................................................................................................................
(15) Service charge for delivery of documents via facsimile (per page, 7 page maximum) ............................................................
(e) Licensing Division service fees.
The Copyright Office has established the
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
§ 203.6 Schedule of fees and methods of
payment for services rendered.
*
PART 203—FREEDOM OF
INFORMATION ACT: POLICIES AND
PROCEDURES
*
4. The authority citation for part 203
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 702; 5 U.S.C. 552, as
amended.
■
5. Revise § 203.6(b) to read as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:35 Mar 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
250
500
250
0.50
1
2
4
75
20
75
20
30
30
Variable.
800
50
550
50
540
300
500
305
50
20
45
1
Fees
($)
(1) Recordation of a notice of intention to make and distribute phonorecords (17 U.S.C. 115) ........................................................
Additional titles (per group of 1 to 10 titles) (paper filing) ...........................................................................................................
Additional titles (per group of 1 to 100 titles) (online filing) .........................................................................................................
(2) Statement of account amendment (cable television systems and satellite carriers, 17 U.S.C. 111 and 119; digital audio recording devices or media, 17 U.S.C. 1003) ....................................................................................................................................
(3) Recordation of a licensing agreement for use of certain works in connection with noncommercial broadcasting (17 U.S.C.
118) ..................................................................................................................................................................................................
(4) Recordation of certain contracts by cable TV systems located outside the 48 contiguous states ...............................................
(5) Notice of digital transmission of sound recording (17 U.S.C. 112, 114) .......................................................................................
Amended notice of digital transmission of sound recording ........................................................................................................
(6) Processing of a statement of account based on secondary transmissions of primary transmissions pursuant to 17 U.S.C.
111:
(i) Form SA1 .................................................................................................................................................................................
(ii) Form SA2 ................................................................................................................................................................................
(iii) Form SA3 ...............................................................................................................................................................................
(7) Processing of a statement of account based on secondary transmissions of primary transmissions pursuant to 17 U.S.C.
119 or 122 ........................................................................................................................................................................................
(8) Search report prepared from Licensing Division records (per hour, 1 hour minimum) ................................................................
*
250
100
30
following fees for specific services of the
Licensing Division:
Licensing division services
*
15919
*
*
*
*
(b) FOIA requests. In responding to
requests under this part the following
fees shall be assessed, unless a waiver
or reduction in fees has been granted
pursuant to paragraph (d) of this
section:
(1) For each quarter hour spent by
administrative staff in searching for a
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
75
20
10
150
140
50
40
40
15
20
725
725
200
requested record, $7.50; for each quarter
hour spent by professional staff in
searching for a requested record, $17.50,
with a half hour minimum in both
cases. No search fee shall be assessed
with respect to requests by educational
institutions, non-commercial scientific
institutions, and representatives of the
news media. Search fees shall be
assessed with respect to all other
requests, subject to the limitations of
E:\FR\FM\24MRR1.SGM
24MRR1
15920
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 56 / Monday, March 24, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
paragraph (c) of this section. Fees may
be assessed for time spent searching
even if the search fails to locate any
responsive records or where the records
located are subsequently determined to
be entirely exempt from disclosure.
(2) For computer searches of records,
which may be undertaken through the
use of existing programing, the actual
direct costs of conducting the search
including the cost of operating a central
processing unit for that portion of
operating time that is directly
attributable to searching for records
responsive to a request, as well as the
direct costs of operator/programmer
salary apportionable to search (at no less
than $65 per hour or fraction thereof).
(3) For each quarter hour spent by
administrative staff in reviewing a
requested record, $7.50; for each quarter
hour spent by professional staff in
reviewing a requested record, $17.50,
with no minimum. No review fee shall
be assessed with respect to requests by
educational institutions, noncommercial scientific institutions, and
representatives of the news media.
Review fees shall be assessed with
respect to all other requests, subject to
the limitations of paragraph (c) of this
section. Review fees shall include only
the direct costs incurred during the
initial examination of a document for
the purposes of determining whether
the documents must be disclosed and
for the purposes of withholding any
portions exempt from disclosure. No
review fee will be charged for time
spent in resolving issues of law or
policy that may be raised in the course
of processing a request.
(4) For copies of all other Copyright
Office records not otherwise provided
for in this section, a minimum fee of
$15.00 for up to 15 pages and $.50 per
page over 15.
(5) Other costs incurred by the
Copyright Office in fulfilling a request
will be chargeable at the actual cost to
the Office.
*
*
*
*
*
WREIER-AVILES on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Dated: March 17, 2014.
Maria A. Pallante,
Register of Copyrights.
Approved by:
James H. Billington,
Librarian of Congress.
[FR Doc. 2014–06293 Filed 3–21–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410–30–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:35 Mar 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 21
RIN 2900–AO87
Vocational Rehabilitation and
Employment Program: Changes
Related to the Honoring America’s
Veterans and Caring for Camp Lejeune
Families Act of 2012
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) is amending its regulation
to reflect a change made by the
Honoring America’s Veterans and
Caring for Camp Lejeune Families Act of
2012. If a veteran has been displaced as
the result of a natural or other disaster
while being paid an allowance, referred
to as an employment adjustment
allowance, this Act allows the extension
of the allowance. This amendment is
necessary to conform the regulation to
the statutory provision.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
effective March 24, 2014.
Applicability Date: In accordance
with the amended statutory provision of
38 U.S.C. 3108(a)(2), this final rule
pertains to all awards of employment
adjustment allowance processed on or
after August 6, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: C.J.
Riley, Policy Analyst, Vocational
Rehabilitation and Employment Service
(28), Veterans Benefits Administration,
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810
Vermont Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20420, (202) 461–9600. (This is not a
toll-free telephone number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
3108 of 38 U.S.C. establishes the criteria
for entitlement to allowances payable
under 38 U.S.C. chapter 31. Section
3108(a)(2) provides for payment of a
subsistence allowance for any veteran
who has been rehabilitated to the point
of employability for two months while
the veteran is satisfactorily following a
Vocational Rehabilitation and
Employment (VR&E) program of
employment services. This statutory
provision regarding a veteran’s
entitlement to such subsistence
allowance, referred to as an employment
adjustment allowance (EAA), is
implemented by 38 CFR 21.268.
Section 701(b) of Public Law 112–154,
Honoring America’s Veterans and
Caring for Camp Lejeune Families Act of
2012, amended 38 U.S.C. 3108(a)(2) by
providing that VA may extend the
payment of an EAA up to an additional
two months while the veteran is
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
satisfactorily following a VR&E program
of employment services if the veteran
has been displaced as a result of a
natural or other disaster while being
paid an EAA. To make it clear that a
veteran displaced as a result of a natural
or other disaster may receive up to an
additional two months of the EAA, we
are amending our regulation to include
this requirement. VA is implementing
the statutory amendment in 38 CFR
21.268 by re-designating current
paragraph (f), ‘‘Employment adjustment
allowance not charged against
entitlement.’’, as new paragraph (g), and
adding a new paragraph (f), ‘‘Special
situations.’’ We will start paying this
additional two months of EAA
beginning August 6, 2013, when the law
took effect. We note the effective date of
August 6, 2013, in new paragraph (f). In
addition, we are adding an authority
citation to the end of the paragraph for
clarification.
Administrative Procedure Act
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs
finds there is good cause under the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) and
(d)(3) to publish this rule without prior
opportunity for public comment and
with an immediate effective date. The
regulatory change made by this rule
reflects a change in statute that VA is
adopting directly, without change, into
VA’s regulations. By statute, Congress is
allowing up to an additional two
months of a special allowance for
veterans following a program of
employment services who have been
displaced as a result of a natural
disaster. The regulatory change does not
involve interpretation of this statutory
provision. Consequently, opportunity
for public comment is unnecessary. The
statutory change was enacted on August
6, 2012, made effective on August 6,
2013. Due to the above considerations,
VA is issuing this rule as a final rule,
effective immediately upon publication.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. Executive Order
12866 (Regulatory Planning and
E:\FR\FM\24MRR1.SGM
24MRR1
Agencies
- Library of Congress
- U.S. Copyright Office
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 56 (Monday, March 24, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15910-15920]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-06293]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
U.S. Copyright Office
37 CFR Parts 201 and 203
[Docket No. 2012-1]
Copyright Office Fees: Registration, Recordation and Related
Services; Special Services; Licensing Division Services; FOIA Services
AGENCY: U.S. Copyright Office, Library of Congress.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Copyright Office of the Library of Congress
is publishing a final rule establishing adjusted fees for its services.
The adjusted fees will recover a significant part of the costs to the
Office of registering copyright claims and provide greater cost
recovery for certain other services provided by the Office. The new fee
schedule reflects some increased and decreased fees, as well as some
fees that the Office determined did not require adjustment. Under the
new fee structure, the fee for online registration of a standard claim
will increase from $35 to $55. However, a new online registration
option for single works by single authors that are not works made for
hire has been introduced at a lower fee of $35. In addition to fees for
registration, related services, and special services, this final rule
establishes updated fees for FOIA-related services.
DATES: This rule is effective May 1, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline C. Charlesworth, General
Counsel and Associate Register of Copyrights, or Chris Weston,
Attorney-Advisor, Office of the General Counsel, at the U.S. Copyright
Office, Copyright GC/I&R, P.O. Box 70400, Washington, DC 20024.
Telephone: (202) 707-8350.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
This final rule adjusts Copyright Office fees in accordance with
the applicable provisions of title 17, United States Code (the
``Copyright Act'' or ``Act''). While some of the Office's services are
free to the public--including the Public Information Office's provision
of valuable guidance on copyright registration and other issues--the
Office does charge fees for many of its services.\1\ The Copyright Act
provides that the Register of Copyrights may adjust the Office's fees
based on a study of its costs for administering the registration of
claims and recordation of documents and the provision of other
services.\2\ Since the Act was amended to provide for these
adjustments, the Office has undertaken fee studies every several years
and made changes accordingly. The Office last adjusted its fees in
2009.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See 17 U.S.C. 708.
\2\ See 17 U.S.C. 708(b).
\3\ Fees, 74 FR 32805 (U.S. Copyright Office July 9, 2009). In
1997, Congress created a new fee system allowing the Office to set
all of its fees by regulation rather than in the statute. An Act to
make technical amendments to certain provisions of title 17, United
States Code, Public Law 105-80, 111 Stat. 1529 (1997). Before then,
Congress itself set the fees for certain basic copyright services,
including registration and recordation (often referred to as
``statutory fees'') and the Register set the fees for other special
services by regulation. In enacting statutory copyright fees,
Congress considered a number of criteria, including the cost of
providing the service, the value of the service to the Library of
Congress, and the benefit of the service to the general public.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 708(a) of the Act specifies that ``[f]ees shall be paid to
Register of Copyrights'' for the following services:
(1) Filing an application under Section 408 for registration of a
copyright claim or for a supplementary registration, including the
issuance of a certificate of registration if registration is made
(2) Filing an application for registration of a claim for renewal of a
subsisting copyright, including the issuance of a certificate of
registration if registration is made
(3) Issuing a receipt for a deposit under Section 407
(4) Recording a transfer of copyright ownership or other document
(5) Filing a notice of intention to obtain a compulsory license under
Section 115(b)
(6) Recording a statement revealing the identity of an author of an
anonymous or pseudonymous work, or recording a statement relating to
the death of an author
(7) Issuing an additional certificate of registration
(8) Issuing any other certification
(9) Making and reporting of a search, and any related services
(10) Filing a statement of account based on secondary transmissions of
primary transmissions pursuant to Sections 119 and 122
(11) Filing a statement of account based on secondary transmissions of
primary transmissions pursuant to Section 111
In addition, Section 708(a) authorizes the Register to fix fees for
other services, such as the cost of preparing copies of Office records.
Section 708 contemplates two different fee-setting mechanisms. Fees
for the services described in (1) through (9) above--which include the
Office's registration and recordation functions and thus reflect
especially important public policy objectives--are to be set forth in a
proposed schedule that is sent to Congress 120 days before the adjusted
fees can take effect.\4\ Other fees, including those for the filing of
cable and satellite statements of account under (10) and (11) and
additional Office services, are not submitted to Congress but instead
are established by the Register of Copyrights based on the Office's
costs.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 17 U.S.C. 708(b). The Register sent the proposed schedule to
Congress on November 14, 2013. It is available at https://www.copyright.gov/docs/newfees/USCOFeeStudy-Nov13.pdf.
\5\ Id. section 708(a). With the 2010 enactment of the Satellite
Television Extension and Localism Act of 2010, Public Law 111-175,
124 Stat. 1218 (2010) (codified in Sections 111, 119, and 122 of
title 17) (``STELA''), Congress for the first time authorized the
Office to charge fees to licensees for the Office's processing of
cable and satellite statements of account under the Section 111,
119, and 122 statutory licenses. Such fees are to be ``reasonable
and may not exceed one-half of the cost necessary to cover
reasonable expenses incurred by the Copyright Office for the
collection and administration of the statements of account and any
royalty fees deposited with such statements.'' 17 U.S.C. 708(a). To
implement STELA, the Office conducted a study of its costs in
relation to the filing of cable and satellite statements and
solicited input from stakeholders on proposed fees through a notice
and comment proceeding. See Copyright Office Fees, 77 FR 18742 (Mar.
28, 2012); Copyright Office Fees, 77 FR 72788 (Dec. 6, 2012), both
available at https://www.copyright.gov/docs/newfees/. As noted above,
the STELA fees are not required to be submitted to Congress. In
November 2013, the Office issued a final rule establishing filing
fees under STELA. See Copyright Office Fees: Cable and Satellite
Statement of Account Fees, 78 FR 71498 (Nov. 29, 2013) (to be
codified at 37 CFR pt. 201), available at https://www.copyright.gov/docs/newfees/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before proposing new fees for the services enumerated in (1)
through (9), the Register must conduct a study of the Office's costs
for registering claims, recording documents, and providing other
services, and must consider the timing of any fee adjustments and the
Office's authority to use the fees consistent with the Office's
budget.\6\ Section 708(b) further provides that the Register may adjust
these fees to ``not more than necessary to cover the
[[Page 15911]]
reasonable costs incurred by the Copyright Office for . . . [such
services], plus a reasonable inflation adjustment to account for any
estimated increase in costs.'' \7\ Finally, Section 708(b) mandates
that the ``[f]ees [so] established . . . shall be fair and equitable
and give due consideration to the objectives of the copyright system.''
\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 17 U.S.C. 708(b)(1).
\7\ Id. section 708(b)(2).
\8\ Id. section 708(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, when assessing fees for providing services under the
Freedom of Information Act (``FOIA''), the Office considers Office of
Management and Budget (``OMB'') guidelines that explain the methodology
for setting such fees.
Pursuant to Section 708, the Office commenced its most recent cost
study in October 2011. The Office began its work by compiling
preliminary fee and service data from fiscal 2011 and followed this
initial research with formal public outreach.
On January 24, 2012, the Office published a Notice of Inquiry
(``NOI'') \9\ seeking comments on the following two questions: (1) With
respect to the standard \10\ registration application fee, whether
special consideration should be provided to individual author-claimants
registering a single work; and (2) whether the Office should expand,
improve, or add to its offerings, including, for example, additional
expedited services and fee options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Copyright Office Fees, 77 FR 3506 (Jan. 24, 2012).
\10\ The Office previously referred to the most common
registration filings (including for single authors claiming single
works) as ``basic'' applications and registrations. The Office
recently began using the term ``standard'' so it could differentiate
between the newly introduced single author/single work offering--
which the Office refers to as the ``single application'' option--and
other traditional ``basic'' registrations, which it now refers to as
``standard.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Office received ten comments in response to the initial
inquiry.\11\ A majority of the comments supported special consideration
for author-claimants registering a single work. Other comments
discussed potential additional services.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ The comments can be viewed on the Copyright Office Web site
at https://www.copyright.gov/docs/newfees/.
\12\ While the NOI requested comments on additional categories
of services, and the Office may continue to explore these issues, at
present it lacks sufficient information to proceed with the
potential expansion of its special handling or expedited services.
In addition, the NOI garnered a number of proposals that the Office
appreciates but that could not be addressed solely in the context of
a fee study, including: Whether photographers could pay a flat fee
for registration of photographs in the context of a business-to-
business submission model; whether copyright registration
certificates and/or recorded documents could be made available
online for free; and whether the Office should accept deposits of
works in electronic formats that might be insufficient for the
Library's ``best edition'' requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
After reviewing the initial comments from the NOI and the data from
fiscal 2011, the Office published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(``NPR'') on March 28, 2012.\13\ In the NPR, the Office set forth a
proposed fee schedule, along with its reasoning. The NPR reviewed
potential fee changes in four categories: (1) Registration,
recordation, and related service fees; (2) other service fees; (3)
Licensing Division fees; and (4) FOIA fees.\14\ The Office explained
that, for most of the fees, it had calculated its costs based on
traditional methodology using an activity-based costing process to
determine the full cost of each Office service.\15\ The Office used OMB
guidelines to determine proposed FOIA fees. Proposed fees for Licensing
Division services were based either on a separate cost study that
addressed the budget and expenditures of the Licensing Division or, in
the case of Licensing Division services that parallel other services in
the Office, were based on the cost study covering Office services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ Copyright Office Fees, 77 FR 18742 (Mar. 28, 2012).
\14\ Some of the fees discussed in the NPR, including various
service fees, Licensing Division fees, and FOIA fees, are set by the
Office pursuant to its authority under Section 708(a) rather than
through the Section 708(b) process, and hence were not discussed in
the proposed schedule submitted to Congress.
\15\ 77 FR at 18743.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NPR proposed that the Office continue to offer both paper and
electronic registration options for standard registration claims and
continue to charge a higher fee for paper forms, which are less
efficient than electronic forms for both the Office and applicants.\16\
The Office also proposed offering a discounted registration fee for
single authors who file an online claim for a single work that is not a
work made for hire.\17\ Referencing its obligation to consider the
objectives of the copyright system, the Office noted the importance of
independent authors' contributions to the nation's economy and to the
Library of Congress's collections.\18\ It also noted that many who
commented on the NOI supported a lower fee in such situations.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ Id. 18743.
\17\ Id.
\18\ Id.
\19\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NPR proposed the following fees for standard registration
claims: $100 for paper applications (up from $65); and $65 for other
electronic claims (up from $35). Additionally, the Office recommended a
fee of $45 for the new category of single authors filing online claims
for single works not made for hire.\20\ In this regard, it should be
noted that the $35 online application fee initiated in 2009 was
discounted to encourage electronic registrations. Prior to that, the
fee for standard applications had been universally set at $45. The
Office also proposed raising the fees applicable to group
registrations, including for groups of published photographs.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ Id.
\21\ Id. 18744.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NPR also proposed new fees for renewal forms. The Office
proposed reducing renewal fees from $115 to $100.\22\ Similarly, the
Office proposed lowering the fee for filing a Renewal Addendum, the
necessary filing for renewal when standard registration for the work
was not made during the original term, from $220 to $100.\23\ The
Office proposed these reductions because renewals are no longer
required to secure the full term of copyright protection and it is not
feasible to attempt full cost recovery.\24\ The NPR noted that setting
a fee ``to recover full cost would be prohibitive and negate the goals
of the Office in encouraging registration of these older claims, many
of which may still be commercially viable, and incorporating these
claims into the public record.'' \25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ Id.
\23\ Id.
\24\ Id.
\25\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, the NPR discussed raising fees for other Office
services. It proposed raising the basic recordation fee from $105 to
$120 and the fee for each additional ten titles recorded from $30 to
$35.\26\ The Office suggested these increases because, on the whole, it
has not recovered the cost of processing recordations in recent
years.\27\ The Office further recommended increased fees for
certification services and issuance of receipts for deposits under 17
U.S.C. 407.\28\ The Office also proposed raising the fee for search
reports prepared from Office records to $200 per hour with a two-hour
minimum.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ Id.
\27\ Id.
\28\ Id.
\29\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NPR discussed potential changes to the Office's service fees,
which include fees for expedited service (or ``special handling''),
secure test processing, requests to reconsider rejections of claims,
and reproduction of Office records, among other things. The Office
proposed increasing the fees for many of these services, with many of
[[Page 15912]]
these proposals reflecting cost increases. The Office, however, did not
propose increased fees for all services (e.g., photocopying fees), and
recommended that some fees be lowered.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regarding expedited handling, the NPR noted that the proposed cost
increase reflected inflationary changes and that the Office declined to
add additional expedited handling categories at this time.\31\ The NPR
also stated that the fees for secure test processing should be
increased because the review process could include one or more staff
members and thus be quite labor intensive.\32\ Finally, the NPR
explained that, while the Office was not proposing an increase in the
fees for requests for reconsideration of rejected claims, it did
propose that each request be limited to a single claim.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ Id. 18745.
\32\ Id.
\33\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NPR also proposed new fees for filing Notices of Intent under
Section 115 of the Copyright Act. The Office accepts Notices of Intent
when a user cannot serve the requisite notice of use of a musical work
on the copyright owner pursuant to Section 115 because Office records
do not reflect the owner's identity and address.\34\ Recently, there
has been an exponential expansion of these notices due to the increased
use of musical works by online services.\35\ The Office thus is
developing an electronic filing system for these notices and, as part
of its study, undertook to determine updated filing fees for Notices of
Intent.\36\ Based on the Office's study, it proposed a fee of $75 for a
notice with a single title, and for notices incorporating additional
titles, a fee of $20 per ten additional titles submitted on paper and
$10 per one hundred additional titles submitted electronically.\37\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ 17 U.S.C. 115(b).
\35\ 77 FR at 18745.
\36\ Id. 18745-46.
\37\ Id. 18746.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the NPR addressed fees for responding to FOIA requests.
The Office noted that it has not adjusted its FOIA fees since 1999.
Following the OMB guidelines, which specify that FOIA fees should be
established using direct costs, the Office proposed fees as follows:
(1) For searches conducted by administrative staff, $15 for the first
half hour and $7.50 for each additional fifteen minutes; and (2) for
searches provided by professional staff, $35 for the first half hour
and $17.50 for each additional fifteen minutes.\38\ Similarly, the
Office proposed adopting new fees for reviewing the documents at the
same rates as those proposed for a FOIA search by administrative and
professional staff, although the fees for reviewing the documents would
be based on fifteen-minute increments and without a minimum fee.\39\
Finally, the Office proposed to eliminate the separate FOIA fee for a
copy of a certificate of copyright registration and the separate FOIA
fee for certification services, currently referenced in 37 CFR
203.6(b)(1), (4), respectively, as those fees are to be assessed in
accordance with the fees for those services as provided in the Office's
general fee schedule.\40\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\38\ Id.
\39\ Id.
\40\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Office received 138 comments in response to the NPR. Some of
the commenters requested that the Office expand the definition of
single claimant/single author, review the renewal fees, and look to
discount bulk registrations. The majority, however, expressed concerns
about the proposed fee increases generally. The comments came from a
wide range of stakeholders, including photographers, visual artists,
several major associations, and others, among them the American
Association of Independent Music (``A2IM''), Association of American
Publishers, ProQuest, EMI CMG Publishing, Graphic Artists Guild,
American Photographic Artists, and the Copyright Alliance.
Some of the comments focused on authors' financial challenges and
their difficulty in shouldering higher costs. For example, A2IM argued
that ``[t]he combination of dedicated anti-piracy resources and
regulatory/judicial resources now required of our members to defend
their businesses are resources that our [small and medium sized
enterprises] simply do not have the financial means or administrative
means to meet.'' \41\ Similarly, the American Society of Media
Photographers and Professional Photographers of America claimed that
``proposed fee increases would be catastrophic for working
photographers and would drastically reduce the frequency of their
copyright registrations,'' which would be ``devastating to
photographers and detrimental to the public record, users of
photographs, and the Copyright Office.'' \42\ Some of these comments
specified the potential harm in raising group registration rates for
published photographs, noting that ``a price increase that nearly
doubles the cost of group registration for photographers appears to fly
in the face of the Copyright Office's mission to increase participation
in the registration process.'' \43\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\41\ Comments of the Am. Ass'n of Independent Music (``A2IM'')
at 1 (May 3, 2012).
\42\ Joint Comments of Am. Soc'y of Media Photographers & Prof'l
Photographers of Am. at 2 (May 14, 2012).
\43\ Id. 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
After carefully considering its costs and the comments in response
to the NPR, on November 14, 2013, the Office submitted a proposed fee
schedule to Congress. The schedule addressed those fees authorized by
Section 708(a)(1)-(9), including fees for registration and recordation,
and its recommendations are followed in this notice and final rule. By
statute, Congress has 120 days to enact a law disapproving the Office's
proposed fee schedule; if it does not, the Register may institute the
proposed fees in a final rule.\44\ Now that 120 days have elapsed
without the enactment of contrary legislation, the Office is hereby
providing notice of the new fee schedule, to go into effect on May 1,
2014. This final rule also sets forth fees for other additional Office
services that the Register is authorized to establish through its
rulemaking authority without the need to submit them to Congress.\45\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\44\ 17 U.S.C. 708(b)(5).
\45\ See id. section 708. The fees set in 37 CFR 201.3(e)(6) and
(7) (the STELA implementation fees) went into effect on January 1,
2014. They are included in the fee schedule set forth in this Final
Rule for ease of insertion into the Code of Federal Regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Fee Setting Methodology
In conducting its fee study, the Office considered established
accounting procedures used by other governmental entities, including
the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board's (``FASAB's'')
guidelines for determining the full cost of federal agency program
activities \46\ and the OMB's Circular A-25 Revised: User Charge \47\
document regarding costing guidelines and establishing user fees.\48\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\46\ This includes FASAB's Managerial Cost Accounting Concepts
and Standards for the Federal Government, which promotes activity-
based costing for calculating the cost of providing services. See
Office of Mgmt. & Budget, Statement #4/Managerial Cost Accounting
Concepts and Standards for the Federal Government (July 31, 1995),
https://www.fasab.gov/pdffiles/sffas-4.pdf.
\47\ See Office of Mgmt. & Budget, Circular No. A-25 Revised,
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars_a025.
\48\ Among other things, Circular A-25 provides that services
with a broad-reaching benefit generally need not recover their full
costs, whereas special services, i.e., those that provide a
particular benefit to a particular customer, may recover more than
their full cost. The excess revenue collected from special services
fees can offset losses accruing from other fees that may not recover
their full cost.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Office looked primarily to two models to evaluate its costs,
namely the additive and activity-based methods.
[[Page 15913]]
The vast majority of costs were assessed using the activity-based
method. Under this approach, the Office calculated how much each
service cost the Office to provide after reviewing both the direct and
indirect costs in fiscal 2011. Section 115 filings, which are
separately administered by the Licensing Division, and Section 407
receipts, a low-volume service that could not be properly considered
through the activity-based model, were evaluated using an additive
methodology, which assessed staff time devoted to particular tasks.
FOIA fees as well were reviewed based on the additive methodology.
Unlike earlier cost studies, to better capture the costs of its
services, the Office included some costs that had previously been
excluded, including Office of the General Counsel's regulatory
activities, which support fee services, and Public Information Office
time spent answering registration-related questions. As in previous
studies, the study continued to exclude costs associated with the
policy and international programs, mandatory deposit program, and
programs dedicated to providing general education and information to
the public. These exclusions generally relate to staff that work
primarily in the Office of the General Counsel, the Office of Policy
and International Affairs, the Publications Section, the Public
Information Office, and the Copyright Acquisitions Division.
Against this backdrop, the Office undertook a comprehensive review
of the fees associated with its various activities. Most copyright
processes are labor intensive and staff activity costs can be linked to
the various fee services. Under an activity-based approach, personnel
resource costs are assigned to specific activities. For example,
mailroom personnel in the Receipt Analysis and Control Division are
assigned to the activity called ``sort mail'' (among others), and a
determination is made as to the proportion of their time spent on that
activity. In the case of personnel costs associated with administration
at the division level, costs are apportioned among the activities
within the division. Office-wide administrative costs, such as the
Register's time and that of her administrative staff, are similarly
apportioned. In this way, the Office can capture direct and indirect
personnel costs associated with each activity.
The next step in the process is the assignment of non-personnel
costs. If non-personnel costs are associated with just one fee service,
they were directly assigned to that activity. For example, the
maintenance costs for the eCO system, the online copyright registration
system, are assigned directly to the Copyright Technology Office
activity eCO. Other non-personnel costs associated with multiple
services were allocated proportionately among all relevant activities.
Once all non-personnel costs are assigned to an activity, those costs
are incorporated into the overall costs for the various fee services.
Using an earlier example, the sort mail activity was considered a cost
for each fee service that is dependent upon incoming mail including,
for example, paper registrations, renewals, and document recordations.
Using these cost determinations as a starting point, the Office
considered statutory fee-setting requirements and economic factors,
including changes in cost due to inflation. Economic factors, including
price elasticity,\49\ also played a role in setting the Office's fees.
The Office considers elasticity when assessing whether fee receipts
will recover the appropriate percentage of costs, both individually and
collectively. The Office has determined that a majority of its fees are
price elastic and that it experiences a reduction in demand when fees
are increased. While external factors, such as the economy, also
influence filing volume, there is a demonstrated inverse relationship
between the increase in fees and the number of claims filed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\49\ Elasticity is the term used to ``measure[ ] how much the
quantity demanded responds to a change in price.'' Joshua Gans,
Stephen King, Robin Stonecash, & N. Gregory Mankiw, Principles of
Economics 90 (5th ed. 2012) (defining price elasticity).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Registration filing and document recordation are two of the most
heavily used services, generating well over 90% of the Office's fee
receipts. These two categories of fees are quite vulnerable to a
decline in demand as fees increase. For example, in the months
following a recent fee increase more modest than the one proposed here,
registration filings dropped as much as 17%.\50\ Therefore, the Office
expects a rather significant short-term decrease in filings upon the
implementation of the new fees, which should lessen as filers adjust to
the fees. Recognizing this fact, the Office must set fees such that
each new fee recovers a reasonable percentage of the cost of processing
the claim but does not drive down usership to a point where overall
receipts decrease.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\50\ Number based on the decline of registrations after the
introduction of new fees in fiscal year 2007.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, the Office must ensure that fee receipts are
sufficient to sustain the Office's operations, taking into account
fluctuations in filing volumes, whether brought on by increased fees
and/or other economic factors in the marketplace. It is important that
fee receipts bring in enough revenue to cover the greater part of the
Office's operations annually and sustain a reserve fund for use in the
event of a short-term budgetary shortfall.
The Office reviewed FOIA fees based on the additive methodology and
in accordance with the OMB Uniform Freedom of Information Act Fee
Schedule and Guidelines.\51\ The OMB guidelines state that agencies
such as the Office may recoup the full allowable direct costs they
incur in responding to FOIA requests. They also state that agencies may
establish separate rates for searching records and reviewing responsive
records to determine issues such as the applicability of an exemption.
The Office is thus adopting a two-tiered fee structure for searches and
reviews to reflect the direct costs of the service depending upon the
level of the personnel conducting the search. Specifically, the Office
is implementing one set of fees for searches conducted by professional
staff and another set of fees for searches conducted by administrative
staff.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\51\ 52 FR 10012 (Mar. 27, 1987).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the Office also took care to consider the overall
objectives of the copyright system in developing its fee schedule.
III. Final Regulation
Based on its study, the Office has determined that some fees should
increase, some should decrease, and some should remain the same. From
past experience, it is certain that any increase in fees will result in
fewer claims, at least temporarily in the time frame immediately
following implementation. It is anticipated, however, that, at the fee
levels proposed, revenues lost due to a decrease in the number of
claims will be offset by revenues generated from the higher fees and
ultimately result in an increase in overall fee receipts. The Office
estimates that revenues generated by the proposed fees will be roughly
$28 million annually.
Below is a further explanation of the Office's final rule with
respect to particular fee categories.
a. Registration, Recordation, and Related Services Fees
The Office is modifying several fees relating to registration,
recordation, and associated services. Some of these adjustments merely
account for changes to costs for existing services and the Office's
overall level of cost recovery. In
[[Page 15914]]
the case of registration and other core Office services, the fees also
reflect the public's interest in a robust and accurate record of
copyright information, including authorship, licensing information, and
public domain status. Finally, in some cases, the Office is not making
a change, as there are certain instances where the Office has
determined that no adjustment was required.
i. Standard Registrations
Fee for applications filed online to increase from $35 to $55
Fee for applications filed on paper to increase from $65 to
$85
The Office offers applicants two options for filing standard
applications: (1) Electronic filing through the Office's eCO system;
and (2) paper filing using a traditional hard copy application.\52\
Currently, the vast majority of applicants use the online filing
option; the Office receives approximately 91% of new copyright claims
through eCO. Electronic filings cost the Office less to process than
paper applications. Additionally, online applications are attractive
because, on average, the Office requires between two and five months to
complete most claims filed electronically, versus five to eleven months
to complete most claims filed on a paper application.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\52\ The Office eliminated Form CO in the summer of 2012, thus
leaving only two methods for filing a standard registration claim.
See Discontinuance of Form CO in Registration Practices, 77 FR 18705
(U.S. Copyright Office Mar. 28, 2012); Discontinuance of Form CO in
Registration Practices Correction, 77 FR 29988 (U.S. Copyright
Office Apr. 9, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In reviewing its registration fees, the Office closely examined its
costs and the degree to which they are recovered under the existing fee
structure. Using an average weighted by claim volume,\53\ the Office
recovered only 65% of the cost to process an online claim and 63% of
the cost to process paper applications during fiscal 2011. These
figures support the Office's proposal to increase fees for both
options, in order to recover a larger percentage of the Office's costs.
It is estimated that the new fees (including the single author/single
work fee discussed below) would recover 73% of the costs of processing
electronic claims and 68% of the costs of processing paper
applications.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\53\ For example, claims for LIT were weighted more heavily than
claims for VA in calculating average volume because the Office
receives more LIT claims than VA claims.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Office recognizes the value of paper applications for those
applicants who do not have adequate access to the Office's online
system or who have other reasons to prefer paper filings. At the same
time, the substantially higher costs of processing paper applications
as compared to the more efficient electronic process continues to
justify a higher fee for paper applications. Accordingly, the Office
will continue to charge different filing fees for these applications.
For electronic applications for standard registration claims, the
Office is raising the current fee from $35 to $55. Though this is a $20
increase over the current fee, as mentioned above, the current fee of
$35 was lowered from the then-existing fee of $45 after the Office's
launch of its eCO system in order to incentivize electronic filings.
The final $55 fee is thus only $10 more than the Office's prior non-
discounted filing fee. Moreover, the $55 fee is less than the $65 fee
that was proposed in the NPR, thus responding to public comments
concerned with the amount of the increase for electronic filing.\54\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\54\ See, e.g., Comments of the Ass'n of Am. Publishers at 2
(``[T]he pending proposal to nearly double current online
registration fees would, if adopted, lead many [publishers],
especially but not exclusively the small or non-profit publishers,
to reevaluate the categories of works currently being registered
with the objective of reducing their registration costs.'')
(emphasis in original).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Office is increasing the existing $65 fee for paper
applications to $85. This change will provide the Office more cost
recovery for the inefficiencies of paper filings. The Office notes that
the fee of $85 is significantly lower than the $100 fee proposed in the
NPR. The revised fee accounts for the Office's consideration of public
comments arguing that a $100 fee was unduly harsh.\55\ After reviewing
the comments, the Office concluded that, while budget and cost
considerations mandate an increase, the increase should be more modest
in light of the significant public interest in registration, including
through a paper-based process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\55\ See, e.g., Joint Comments of Am. Soc'y of Media
Photographers & Prof'l Photographers of Am. at 3 (May 14, 2012)
(``Although we recognize the Copyright Office's desire to encourage
registrants to use the eCO registration platform over Form VA, we
believe that nearly doubling the cost for those adept at using Form
VA would create a significant deterrent to registration in its
entirety.''); Comments of ArtistsUndertheDome.org at 2 (May 14,
2012) (``The . . . $100 [fee] is unacceptable . . . those who use
paper filing systems tend to be older, do not have access to the
internet or fast internet services such as broadband, and/or they
tend to be lower income. . . . These proposed increased fees will
mean less artists will be able to afford to register their
copyright(s).'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ii. Single Author, Single Work Applications Filed Online
Fee for single registration application filed online by a
single author for a single work not made for hire to remain at $35
As discussed above, the Office is committed to maintaining an
affordable copyright registration system and understands that works of
independent creators fuel the nation's economy and are critical to the
Library of Congress' collections. Moreover, if individual authors do
not register and are not part of the public database, they--more than
any other group of copyright owners--may be difficult to find.
In making the decision to add a new registration category for
individual authors, the Office took into account a large number of
public comments advocating for a lower fee. Commenters noted, as did
the Office, that such applications are easier to process, that
registration provides important remedies for the author, and that
registration benefits the public by creating a more robust public
record. As one commenter noted, ``[Office] [s]ervices which facilitate
individual author-claimants registering a single work that is not a
work made for hire . . . promote and protect authorship and potentially
sharpen the chain of title documentation. . . .'' \56\ Those supporting
a reduced fee for single author/single work claims came from a variety
of backgrounds, including the performing and visual arts. The Office
believes this option will serve a wide range of authors.\57\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\56\ Comments of Indep. Film & Television Alliance at 1 (Feb.
23, 2012).
\57\ After proposing this option, the Office published an
additional Federal Register notice explaining that the single
author/single claim application was available for use on the
Office's eCO system. See Single Application Option, 78 FR 38843
(U.S. Copyright Office June 28, 2013). In the past several months,
applicants have begun to use the new procedure, allowing the Office
to assess how best to implement the process and assist individual
authors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
iii. Group Registration, Mask Work, and Vessel Hull Fees
Fees for registration of a claim in a group of contributions
to a periodical (Form GR/CP) or database updates to increase from $65
to $85
Fees for group registration of published photographs or
registration of automated databases that predominately consist of
photographs and updates thereto: for paper filings, fee will remain at
$65 and for electronic filings, fee will increase from $35 to $55
Fees for registration of a claim in a group of serials (Form
SE/Group) (per issue, minimum of two issues) to remain at $25
Fees for registration of a claim in a group of daily
newspapers and qualified newsletters (Form G/DN) to remain at $80
[[Page 15915]]
Fees for registration of a claim in a mask work (Form MW) to
increase from $105 to $120
Fees for registration of a claim in a vessel hull (Form D/VH)
to increase from $220 to $400
The Office has determined that the fees for registration of some
but not all types of group claims should be adjusted.
The fee to register a claim in a group of contributions to a
periodical--a paper-based process that is labor-intensive--will
increase from $65 to $85.
In the case of both serials and newspapers, where the Office's cost
recovery currently appears adequate, the Office is not making an
adjustment. Although the NPR had indicated that these two latter
categories of fees would also be subject to an increase, upon further
analysis, the Office believes that the current fees remain appropriate.
Similarly, for paper applications for groups of published
photographs and for automated databases that predominately consist of
photographs and updates thereto, the Office is making no increase.
Despite its initial proposal to increase this fee, the Office now
believes it should remain at $65. Comments received in response to the
Office's initial fee proposal demonstrate that photographers face
particular challenges with the registration process due to the large
quantities of works they often create in brief periods of time.\58\ In
light of these conditions, the Office is continuing to study how best
to facilitate photographers' registration of their works. Thus, while
the Office may alter the fee structure for registration of groups of
published photographs in the future, the fee for paper applications
will not change now.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\58\ See, e.g., Joint Comments of the Am. Soc'y of Media
Photographers & Prof'l Photographers of Am. (May 4, 2012); Comments
of Nat'l Press Photographers Ass'n (May 14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For electronic applications for these types of photograph claims,
however, the fee will increase from $35 to $55, so it is consistent
with the fees for other electronic applications.\59\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\59\ Although both the NPR and the proposed schedule submitted
to Congress tacitly subsumed these electronic group photograph
applications under ``standard'' applications filed online, because
they are not truly ``standard,'' this final rule clarifies their
separate status as group applications.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the mask work and vessel hull registration fees are being
increased to recover a greater percentage of the costs of processing
these claims.
iv. Other Registration Fees
Fee for registration of a claim in a restored copyright (Form
GATT) to increase from $65 to $85
Fee for registration of a correction or amplification to a
claim (Form CA) to increase from $100 to $130
After reviewing its costs, the Office determined that current fees
do not offset a sufficient percentage of the Office's costs in
accepting registrations for paper-based claims, which include claims in
restored copyrights (Form GATT). In addition, it concluded that the
current fee for filing a registration of a correction or amplification
to a claim (Form CA), another paper-based process, was insufficient.
Paper-based processes are considerably less efficient than electronic
registration. Accordingly, the Office is increasing both of these fees.
v. Renewal Fees
Fee for renewal application to decrease from $115 to $100
Fee for renewal addendum to decrease from $220 to $100
The Office is making these reductions due to the unique nature of
renewals in the history of copyright law and recent experiences in
reviewing renewal documents. Under prior law, certain copyright claims
had to be renewed with the Office in their twenty-eighth year of
protection to remain valid for the remainder of their terms. The
current Act changed the renewal requirement; a renewal is no longer
necessary to secure the full term of copyright protection. Nonetheless,
for pre-1978 works, renewal registration still offers certain benefits
for the owner and the public.
There has been a dramatic decrease in renewal registrations over
the past seven years, likely due to the change in law and increased
fees associated with renewal. In this same time frame, some of those
who may have benefited from filing renewal registrations have instead
mistakenly attempted to file initial claims of registration. Dwindling
and incorrect renewal registrations diminish the public record, thus
harming the Office's overall mission to serve as a robust repository of
copyright information.
The Office's decision to lower the renewal fee to $100 should
encourage the filing of more renewal claims. Similarly, the fee for a
renewal addendum, an additional requirement when standard registration
for the work was not made during the original term, will also be lower.
A renewal addendum documents the copyright status of a work, thus
allowing users to know whether the work is under copyright protection.
The Office believes that the lower fees for renewals and renewal
addendums strike the appropriate balance between cost recovery and the
public record.
vi. Recordation of Documents
Fee for recordation of a document to remain at $105
Fee for recording groups of up to ten additional titles
associated with that document to increase from $30 to $35
In the NPR, the Office proposed increases to its recordation fees
to help the Office better recover costs in this area. The Office's eCO
system permits electronic registration of copyright claims. By
contrast, the Office's recordation system--which is not part of eCO--
remains a largely paper-driven process. Although the Office recovers
the cost of recording simple documents, it has been unable to recover
the full cost associated with processing more substantial documents
that include multiple titles of copyrighted works. The titles, which
can number in the thousands, must each be individually indexed.
Recordation of copyright transfers and other copyright-related
documents is a voluntary process but critical to maintaining a public
record of copyright ownership. The proposed increase to $35 for each
ten additional titles associated with a recorded document will allow
for greater cost recovery in the case of more complicated filings but
should not be unduly burdensome for filers. At the same time, upon
further analysis of its costs, the Office has determined that it is not
necessary to change the existing fee of $105 for its basic recordation
service, where it is already achieving full recovery.
The Office is currently considering how to migrate its recordation
function to an electronic system, a process which may require both
statutory changes and technological upgrades, and will continue to
evaluate its recordation fees as that process moves forward.\60\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\60\ The Office is looking at this issue in several ways,
including through stakeholder meetings, technology assessments, and
scholarly analysis as to the recordation requirements of title 17.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
vii. Certification Fees
Fee for issuance of additional certificate of registration to
increase from $35 to $40
Fee for certification of other Office records, including
search reports, to increase from $165 to $200 per hour
Based on the cost study, the Office is enacting a modest increase
to the fee for issuance of additional certificates of registration.
Even though this could yield fee receipts slightly above the Office's
costs of providing additional certificates, the limited increase is
appropriate under the fee-setting principles articulated in OMB's
Circular A-25 because the service in question
[[Page 15916]]
benefits only the individual requester and any excess fee receipts can
be used to subsidize other services with lower cost recovery. Moreover,
at $40, the new fee remains reasonable for requesters.
With respect to other types of Office records and search reports,
as in past cost studies, the Office has determined that fee receipts
cover less than the actual costs of providing certification services.
The Office recognizes, however, that users need to be able to obtain
certified copies of Office records for legal and other purposes.
Although the Office is proposing an increase in its fee for these
additional certification services to $200 per hour, it has been mindful
of its duty to balance the goal of cost recovery against the need for
access to reliable public records. It is therefore establishing this
fee below full cost recovery.
viii. Search Reports and Records Retrieval
Fee for reference search reports (other than Licensing
Division reports) to increase from $165 to $200 per hour, with a two-
hour minimum
Fee for estimate of search fee to increase from $115 to $200
(applied against the search charges)
Fee for retrieval of in-process or completed Copyright Office
records or other materials to increase from $165 to $200 for both paper
records (per hour, one hour minimum) and digital records (per hour,
half hour minimum, quarter hour increments)
The Office's imposition of a two hour minimum charge in 2009 for
search reports prepared from Office records (other than those prepared
from Licensing Division records) resulted in a substantial increase in
cost recovery. Nevertheless, as in past cost studies, the Office has
found that the fee covers only a portion of the actual cost of
providing the reference search service. To achieve full cost recovery
would render the cost too high for the average user as a practical
matter. A very high fee also prejudices users who, for legal reasons,
are required to have the Office conduct a search.
Accordingly, the Office is implementing a fee increase from $165 to
$200 per hour for search reports, again with a two hour minimum (other
than for reports prepared from Licensing Division records). To permit
additional cost recovery, the Office will also increase the estimate of
search fee--which covers the cost of estimating the total fees for a
search and is credited against the hourly search fee--from $115 to
$200.
Finally, the fee increase for retrieval of in-process or completed
Copyright Office records or other Copyright Office materials is
consistent with the Office's need to more fully recover the cost of its
services.
ix. Other Services
Fee for preregistration of certain unpublished works to be
increased from $115 to $140
Fee for recordation of a designation of an agent under Section
512(c)(2) to remain at $105, with the fee for additional names (per
group of 1 to 10) to be increased from $30 to $35
Fee for issuance of a receipt for a Section 407 deposit to
remain at $30
The fee increases for preregistration of certain unpublished works
and for recordation of additional names (in groups of 1 to 10) in
conjunction with the designation of an agent to receive notices of
infringement under Section 512(c)(2) of title 17 (codifying Section 202
of title II of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (``DMCA'')) were
set forth in the NPR and did not elicit any comments, so the Office is
implementing these fee increases as proposed. The Office believes that
the current fees applicable to recording the designation of a DMCA
agent itself and for issuance of a receipt for a Section 407 deposit
are adequate, so these will remain unchanged.\61\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\61\ The Office notes that it is currently engaged in efforts to
convert its DMCA agent registration system to a fully electronic
process. The introduction of a new system will likely result in
future adjustment of the fees applicable to recordations under
Section 512(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
b. Special Services Fees
i. Special Handling
Fee for special handling of registration claims to increase
from $760 to $800, with the handling fee for each non-special handling
claim using the same deposit to remain at $50
Fee for special handling of document recordation to increase
from $480 to $550
Fee for special handling of a search report to increase from
$280 to $300 per hour (for up to two hours) \62\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\62\ This service is currently described as ``expedited search
report'' and priced at $445 per hour, a number that combines the
basic search report fee with the surcharge for expedited service. In
this final rule, the Office has separated the two fees, so that the
new $300 hourly fee represents only the surcharge on top of the new
$200 hourly fee for the search report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee for special handling of retrieval, certification, and
copying requests to increase from $265 to $305 per hour
The surcharges assessed for obtaining expedited registration,
recordation and other services reflect a premium payment for the value
of the expedited service to the individual requester. The Office
believes that increases to these fees are both reasonable and justified
in light of the diversion of Office resources that is required to
provide this type of specialized handling for individual customers.
ii. Secure Test Processing
Fee for secure test processing to increase from $165 to $250
per staff member per hour
The Office provides specialized services for secure test
processing, specifically a private review of the full deposit of a
secure test that involves a comparison of the deposit with identifying
material that does not disclose confidential content. The Office is
implementing the above fee increase based on the cost of supplying this
service. The charge will be applied per staff member because two or
more staff members may be required to expedite the review of the
deposits.
iii. Requests for Reconsideration of Rejections of Claims (Appeals)
Fee for first request for reconsideration to remain at $250
(but the option of adding claims beyond those in the subject
registration is no longer available)
Fee for second request for reconsideration to remain at $500
(but the option of adding claims beyond those in the subject
registration is no longer available)
The Office is not changing the fees for the first and second
reconsideration of a single claim, in part because the Office
recognizes that an increase in fees may impede a claimant from pursuing
administrative review of a rejected claim. The Office is, however,
eliminating its practice of allowing applicants to include multiple
related claims that were not covered by a single application in a
single request for reconsideration. Previously, the Office allowed
applicants to consolidate requests to reconsider works from different
applications if the works were related. It is not, however, necessarily
more efficient to review multiple claims, because each claim must still
be analyzed separately. Thus, the Office is making a change to the
process so that the fee for a request for reconsideration will cover
only the work or works included in a single original claim for
registration.
iv. Deposit Copies
Fee for handling an extra deposit copy for certification to
increase from $45 to $50
[[Page 15917]]
Fee for full-term retention of a published deposit to increase
from $470 to $540
The Office believes that fees for handling extra deposit copies for
certification and for full-term retention of published deposits should
be increased to reflect the specialized nature of these services, which
benefit individual customers.
v. Copying Fees
Fee for black and white photocopies on 8\1/2\ x 11 paper to
remain at $0.50 per page with a $12 minimum
Fee for black and white photocopies on 11 x 17 paper to remain
at $1 per page with a $12 minimum
Fee for color photocopies on 8\1/2\ x 11 paper to remain at $2
per page with a $12 minimum
Fee for color photocopies on 11 x 17 paper to remain at $4 per
page with a $12 minimum
Fee for copies of audiocassettes and videocassettes to remain
at $75 for the first 30 minutes and at $20 for each additional fifteen-
minute increment
Fee for copies of CDs or DVDs to be reduced from $100 to $30
Fee for new service of copying to flash drives to be
established at $30
Fee for copying to unsupported formats and other copying of
materials by outside providers to be at cost of provider
Based upon consultation with those who provide copying services,
the Office finds that it is advisable to maintain the current fees for
most copying services. The Office is, however, reducing the fee for
copying CDs and DVDs due to lower copying costs. Additionally, the fee
for copying to formats unsupported by the Office will be what the
provider charges the Copyright Office. The Office no longer directly
handles photographs, slides, zip drives, and floppy discs, so the fees
for copying in these formats will be assessed at the cost of the
provider. Similarly, in the case of copies that the Office must request
from the Library of Congress's Duplication Services, the Office will
pass along the actual cost to the customer.
vi. Other Special Services Fees
Fee for service charge for deposit account overdraft to
increase from $165 to $250
Fee for service charge for dishonored deposit account
replenishment check to increase from $85 to $100
Fee for service charge for an uncollectible or non-negotiable
payment to increase from $25 to $30
Fee for service charge for Federal Express mailing to increase
from $40 to $45
Fee for notice to libraries and archives to remain at $50,
with the fee for each additional title to remain at $20
Fee for the service charge for delivery of documents via
facsimile (per page, seven-page maximum) to remain at $1 per page
The Office finds that it is appropriate to raise fees for some
other special services in order to improve cost recovery. Specifically,
after reviewing the costs of the above services, the Office has
determined these fees should be raised except for fees for notices to
libraries and archives and those for facsimile delivery services.
c. Licensing Division Fees
i. Recordation of a Notice of Intention To Make and Distribute
Phonorecords Under Section 115
Fee for filing a basic notice with a single title to increase
from $60 to $75
Fee for paper filing of additional titles to remain at $20 per
set of ten titles
Fee for electronic filing of additional titles to be
established at $10 per set of one hundred titles
With the rise of digital services offering expansive catalogs of
music, many more users seek to file notices of intent to avail
themselves of the Section 115 statutory license when they cannot
identify or locate the owners of particular musical works in Office
records. In 2009, the Office responded by adjusting its Section 115
filing fees to accommodate the submission of multiple titles at the
same time. More recently, the Office has initiated a test of an
electronic filing option to allow for more cost-effective processing of
digitally submitted notices with multiple titles. While the new fees
reflect the higher costs of handling single-title notices, they also
take into consideration the cost savings associated with electronic
submission of multiple titles by adopting a substantially lower per-
title fee for such submissions.
ii. Recordation of Licensing Agreements and Contracts
Filing fee for recordation of a licensing agreement pursuant
to 17 U.S.C. 118 to remain at $140
Fee for recordation of certain contracts by cable television
systems located outside the forty-eight contiguous states pursuant to
17 U.S.C. 111 to remain at $50
The Office determined that it was not necessary to increase the
fees for recordation of a licensing agreement under Section 118 or for
recordation of certain contracts by cable systems as provided under
Section 111, so these fees will remain at their current levels.
iii. Other Licensing Division Fees
Fee for statement of account amendment (cable television
systems and satellite carriers, 17 U.S.C. 111 and 119; digital audio
recording devices or media, 17 U.S.C. 1003) to increase from $100 to
$150
Fee for notice of digital transmission of sound recording
(Sections 112, 114) to increase from $25 to $40
Fee for amended notice of digital transmission of sound
recording to increase from $25 to $40
Fee for search report prepared from Licensing Division records
to increase from $165 to $200 per hour, with a one-hour minimum
For search reports prepared from Licensing Division records, while
the proposed hourly fee adjustment tracks that for general Copyright
Office search reports, the Office believes that a one hour (rather than
two hour) minimum is sufficient in the case of Licensing records. A
number of Licensing Division searches are purely factual, for example,
due diligence searches to verify that mandatory filings were made. Such
searches often can be conducted fairly quickly and thus the Office has
determined that a one-hour minimum is sufficient.
The fee increases for certain other Licensing Division services
listed above were proposed in the NPR and received no negative
comments. The Office is therefore implementing these increases to
achieve greater cost recovery.
d. FOIA Services Fees
Fee for a search prepared by administrative staff (per quarter
hour increment with a half hour minimum) to change from $16.25 to $7.50
Fee for a search prepared by professional staff (per quarter
hour increment with a half hour minimum) to change from $16.25 to
$17.50
Fee for a review of documents performed by administrative
staff, per quarter hour, to be assessed at $7.50 an hour
Fee for a review of documents performed by professional staff,
per quarter hour, to be assessed at $17.50 an hour
As explained above, the Office looked to OMB guidelines when
setting its fees for FOIA requests. Currently, the Office charges an
hourly fee for searches related to such requests. The Office last
adjusted its FOIA fees in 1999.
The Office is implementing a fee adjustment and a new schedule for
[[Page 15918]]
assessing FOIA search fees and reviewing the documents. OMB guidelines
allow agencies to set an average fee based on the individuals
processing FOIA requests where there are homogeneous classes of
personnel used to perform the required service (i.e., identifiable
classes of personnel that have like characteristics--in this case, all
professional or all administrative staff). The Office thus is
establishing two sets of review and search fees: (1) One fee for those
services conducted at the technical or administrative level; and (2) a
higher fee for those services conducted at the professional level.
These fees will be charged in quarter hour increments, with a minimum
of a half hour for a search to account for overhead. The Office thus
will charge $7.50 per quarter hour increment for searches performed by
administrative staff, with a minimum fee of $15 to cover the first half
hour. For searches performed by professional staff, the Office will
assess a fee of $17.50 per quarter hour increment, with a minimum fee
of $35. The same fee structure will apply to review services, but with
no minimum fee.\63\
\63\ In this regard, the Office notes that it is revising the
language of the provision concerning the applicability of FOIA
review fees (currently codified at 37 CFR 203.6(b)(7)) to more
closely track the language of the FOIA statute.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, as noted above, the Office is revising two provisions of
37 CFR 203.6(b) to eliminate FOIA-specific fees for obtaining copies of
registration certificates and for certification services (currently
referenced in 37 CFR 203.6(b)(1) and (4), respectively). Pursuant to 37
CFR 203.6(a), the fees for these services, which involve the public
records of the Copyright Office, are to be assessed in accordance with
the Office's general fee schedule. The Office believes these changes
will help to avoid confusion about the applicable fee when such
services are provided in connection with a FOIA request.
List of Subjects
37 CFR Part 201
Copyright, General provisions.
37 CFR Part 203
Copyright, Freedom of Information Act: Policies and Procedures.
Final Rule
In consideration of the foregoing, under the authority of 17 U.S.C.
702, the U.S. Copyright Office amends 37 CFR chapter II as follows:
CHAPTER II--U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE, LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
0
1. The heading of chapter II is revised to read as set forth above.
PART 201--GENERAL PROVISIONS
0
2. The authority citation for part 201 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 702.
0
3. Revise Sec. 201.3(c), (d), and (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 201.3 Fees for registration, recordation, and related services,
special services, and services performed by the Licensing Division.
* * * * *
(c) Registration, recordation, and related service fees. The
Copyright Office has established the following fees for these services:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Registration, recordation and related services Fees ($)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Registration of a standard claim in an original work ..............
of authorship:
Electronic filing:
(i) Single author, same claimant, one work, not 35
for hire.......................................
(ii) All other filings.......................... 55
Paper Filing (Forms PA, SR, TX, VA, SE, SR)......... 85
(2) Registration of a claim in a group of contributions 85
to periodicals (Form GR/CP) or database updates........
(3) Registration for a group of published photographs,
or an automated database that predominately consists of
photographs and updates thereto:
(i) Electronic filing............................... 55
(ii) Paper filing................................... 65
(4) Registration of a renewal claim (Form RE):
(i) Claim without addendum.......................... 100
(ii) Addendum (in addition to the fee for the claim) 100
(5) Registration of a claim in a group of serials (Form 25
SE/Group) (per issue, minimum 2 issues)................
(6) Registration of a claim in a group of daily 80
newspapers and qualified newsletters (Form G/DN).......
(7) Registration of a claim in a restored copyright 85
(Form GATT)............................................
(8) Preregistration of certain unpublished works........ 140
(9) Registration of a correction or amplification to a 130
claim (Form CA)........................................
(10) Registration of a claim in a mask work (Form MW)... 120
(11) Registration of a claim in a vessel hull (Form D/ 400
VH)....................................................
(12) Provision of an additional certificate of 40
registration...........................................
(13) Certification of other Copyright Office records, 200
including search reports (per hour)....................
(14) Search report prepared from official records other 200
than Licensing Division records (per hour, 2 hour
minimum)...............................................
Estimate of search fee (credited to search fee)..... 200
(15) Retrieval of in-process or completed Copyright
Office records or other Copyright Office materials:
(i) Retrieval of paper records (per hour, 1 hour 200
minimum)...........................................
(ii) Retrieval of digital records (per hour, half 200
hour minimum, quarter hour increments).............
(16) Recordation of document, including a notice of 105
intention to enforce (single title)....................
Additional titles (per group of 1 to 10 titles)..... 35
(17) Recordation of a designation of agent to receive 105
notification of claimed infringements under Sec.
512(c)(2)..............................................
Additional names (per group of 1 to 10)............. 35
(18) Issuance of a receipt for a Sec. 407 deposit..... 30
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(d) Special Service Fees. The Copyright Office has established the
following fees for special services of the Office:
[[Page 15919]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special services Fees ($)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Service charge for deposit account overdraft........ 250
(2) Service charge for dishonored deposit account 100
replenishment check....................................
(3) Service charge for an uncollectible or non- 30
negotiable payment.....................................
(4) Appeals:
(i) First appeal (per claim)........................ 250
(ii) Second appeal (per claim)...................... 500
(5) Secure test processing charge (per staff member per 250
hour)..................................................
(6) Copying of Copyright Office records by staff:
Photocopy (black & white, 8\1/2\ x 11) (per page, 0.50
minimum: $12)......................................
Photocopy (black & white, 11 x 17) (per page, 1
minimum: $12)......................................
Photocopy (color, 8\1/2\ x 11) (per page, minimum: 2
$12)...............................................
Photocopy (color, 11 x 17) (per page, minimum: $12). 4
Audiocassette (first 30 minutes).................... 75
Additional 15 minute increments................. 20
Videocassette (first 30 minutes).................... 75
Additional 15 minute increments................. 20
CD or DVD........................................... 30
Flash drive......................................... 30
Unsupported formats and other copying of materials Variable.
by outside providers, at cost of provider..........
(7) Special handling fee for a claim.................... 800
Handling fee for each non-special handling claim 50
using the same deposit.............................
(8) Special handling fee for recordation of a document.. 550
(9) Handling fee for extra deposit copy for 50
certification..........................................
(10) Full-term retention of a published deposit......... 540
(11) Special handling of search report, per hour (for up 300
to 2 hours)............................................
Additional hours of searching, per hour............. 500
(12) Special handling of retrieval, certification, and 305
copying, per hour......................................
(13) Notice to libraries and archives................... 50
Each additional title............................... 20
(14) Service charge for Federal Express mailing......... 45
(15) Service charge for delivery of documents via 1
facsimile (per page, 7 page maximum)...................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(e) Licensing Division service fees. The Copyright Office has
established the following fees for specific services of the Licensing
Division:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Licensing division services Fees ($)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Recordation of a notice of intention to make and 75
distribute phonorecords (17 U.S.C. 115)................
Additional titles (per group of 1 to 10 titles) 20
(paper filing).....................................
Additional titles (per group of 1 to 100 titles) 10
(online filing)....................................
(2) Statement of account amendment (cable television 150
systems and satellite carriers, 17 U.S.C. 111 and 119;
digital audio recording devices or media, 17 U.S.C.
1003)..................................................
(3) Recordation of a licensing agreement for use of 140
certain works in connection with noncommercial
broadcasting (17 U.S.C. 118)...........................
(4) Recordation of certain contracts by cable TV systems 50
located outside the 48 contiguous states...............
(5) Notice of digital transmission of sound recording 40
(17 U.S.C. 112, 114)...................................
Amended notice of digital transmission of sound 40
recording..........................................
(6) Processing of a statement of account based on
secondary transmissions of primary transmissions
pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 111:
(i) Form SA1........................................ 15
(ii) Form SA2....................................... 20
(iii) Form SA3...................................... 725
(7) Processing of a statement of account based on 725
secondary transmissions of primary transmissions
pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 119 or 122.......................
(8) Search report prepared from Licensing Division 200
records (per hour, 1 hour minimum).....................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
PART 203--FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT: POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
0
4. The authority citation for part 203 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 702; 5 U.S.C. 552, as amended.
0
5. Revise Sec. 203.6(b) to read as follows:
Sec. 203.6 Schedule of fees and methods of payment for services
rendered.
* * * * *
(b) FOIA requests. In responding to requests under this part the
following fees shall be assessed, unless a waiver or reduction in fees
has been granted pursuant to paragraph (d) of this section:
(1) For each quarter hour spent by administrative staff in
searching for a requested record, $7.50; for each quarter hour spent by
professional staff in searching for a requested record, $17.50, with a
half hour minimum in both cases. No search fee shall be assessed with
respect to requests by educational institutions, non-commercial
scientific institutions, and representatives of the news media. Search
fees shall be assessed with respect to all other requests, subject to
the limitations of
[[Page 15920]]
paragraph (c) of this section. Fees may be assessed for time spent
searching even if the search fails to locate any responsive records or
where the records located are subsequently determined to be entirely
exempt from disclosure.
(2) For computer searches of records, which may be undertaken
through the use of existing programing, the actual direct costs of
conducting the search including the cost of operating a central
processing unit for that portion of operating time that is directly
attributable to searching for records responsive to a request, as well
as the direct costs of operator/programmer salary apportionable to
search (at no less than $65 per hour or fraction thereof).
(3) For each quarter hour spent by administrative staff in
reviewing a requested record, $7.50; for each quarter hour spent by
professional staff in reviewing a requested record, $17.50, with no
minimum. No review fee shall be assessed with respect to requests by
educational institutions, non-commercial scientific institutions, and
representatives of the news media. Review fees shall be assessed with
respect to all other requests, subject to the limitations of paragraph
(c) of this section. Review fees shall include only the direct costs
incurred during the initial examination of a document for the purposes
of determining whether the documents must be disclosed and for the
purposes of withholding any portions exempt from disclosure. No review
fee will be charged for time spent in resolving issues of law or policy
that may be raised in the course of processing a request.
(4) For copies of all other Copyright Office records not otherwise
provided for in this section, a minimum fee of $15.00 for up to 15
pages and $.50 per page over 15.
(5) Other costs incurred by the Copyright Office in fulfilling a
request will be chargeable at the actual cost to the Office.
* * * * *
Dated: March 17, 2014.
Maria A. Pallante,
Register of Copyrights.
Approved by:
James H. Billington,
Librarian of Congress.
[FR Doc. 2014-06293 Filed 3-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410-30-P