Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements, 15799-15800 [2014-06215]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 55 / Friday, March 21, 2014 / Notices
Other information may be provided by
the manufacturer but is not required.
FMVSS No. 209, ‘‘Seat belt
assemblies,’’ requires safety belts to be
labeled with the year of manufacture,
the model, and the name or trademark
of the manufacturer (S4.1(j)).
Additionally replacement safety belts
that are for use only in specifically
stated motor vehicles must have labels
or accompanying instruction sheets to
specify the applicable vehicle models
and seating positions (S4.1(k)). All other
replacement belts are required to be
accompanied by an installation
instruction sheet (S4.1(k)).
Seat belt assemblies installed as
original equipment in new motor
vehicles need not be required to be
labeled with position/model
information. This information is only
useful if the assembly is removed with
the intention of using the assembly as a
replacement in another vehicle; this is
not a common practice.
Part 567, ‘‘Certification,’’ requires
each manufacturer or distributor of
motor vehicles to furnish to the dealer,
or distributor of the vehicle, a
certification that the vehicle meets all
applicable FMVSS. This certification is
required by that provision to be in the
form of a label permanently affixed to
the vehicle. Under 49 U.S.C. 32504,
vehicle manufacturers are directed to
make a similar certification with regard
to bumper standards. To implement this
requirement, NHTSA issued 49 CFR
Part 567. The agency’s regulations
establish form and content requirements
for the certification labels.
Description of the Likely Respondents
(Including Estimated Number and
Proposed Frequency of Response to the
Collection of Information): NHTSA
anticipates that approximately 25 new
prime glazing manufactures per year
will contact the agency and request a
manufacturer identification number.
These new glazing manufacturers must
submit one letter, one time, identifying
their company. In turn, the agency
responds by assigning them a unique
manufacturer number. For other
collections in this notice, no response is
necessary from manufacturers. These
labels are only required to be placed on
each master cylinder reservoir, each
safety belt and every motor vehicle
intended for retain sale in the United
States. Therefore, the number of
respondents is not applicable.
Estimate of the Total Annual
Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden
Resulting from the Collection of
Information: NHTSA estimates that all
manufacturers will need a total of
74,091 hours to comply with these
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:18 Mar 20, 2014
Jkt 232001
requirements, at a total annual cost of
1,481,320.
Comments are invited on: Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the Department,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; the accuracy of
the Department’s estimate of the burden
of the proposed information collection;
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506(c); delegation of
authority at 49 CFR 1.50.
Lori K. Summers,
Director, Office of Crashworthiness
Standards.
[FR Doc. 2014–06152 Filed 3–20–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket Number NHTSA–2014–
0018]
Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping
Requirements
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Request for public comment on
an extension of a currently approved
collection.
AGENCY:
Before a Federal agency can
collect certain information from the
public, it must receive approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Under procedures established
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, before seeking OMB approval,
Federal agencies must solicit public
comment on proposed collections of
information, including extensions and
reinstatement of previously approved
collections.
This document describes one
collection of information for which
NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before May 20, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Comments must refer to the
docket notice numbers cited at the
beginning of this notice and be
submitted to Docket Management, Room
W12–140, Ground Level, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
20590 by any of the following methods.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15799
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Agency Web site: https://
dms.dot.gov. Follow the instructions for
submitting comments on the Docket
Management System.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays. Telephone: 1–
800–647–5527.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and docket
number for this proposed collection of
information. Note that all comments
received will be posted without change
to https://dms.dot.gov including any
personal information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
dms.dot.gov at any time or to Room
W12–140 on the ground level of the
DOT Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE., West Building, Ground Floor,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal Holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Complete copies of each request for
collection of information may be
obtained at no charge from Carlita
Ballard, NHTSA 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W43–439, NVS–131,
Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Ballard’s
telephone number is (202) 366–5222.
Please identify the relevant collection of
information by referring to its OMB
Control Number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed
collection of information to OMB for
approval, it must first publish a
document in the Federal Register
providing a 60-day comment period and
otherwise consult with members of the
public and affected agencies concerning
each proposed collection of information.
The OMB has promulgated
regulations describing what must be
included in such a document. Under
OMB’s regulation (at 5 CFR 1320.8(d)),
an agency must ask for public comment
on the following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
15800
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 55 / Friday, March 21, 2014 / Notices
(ii) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(iii) How to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected and;
(iv) How to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g. permitting
electronic submission of responses.
In compliance with these
requirements, NHTSA asks for public
comments on the following proposed
collections of information:
Title: Petitions for Exemption From
the Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard
(49 CFR Part 543).
OMB Control Number: 2127–0542.
Form Number: None.
Affected Public: Motor vehicle
manufacturers.
Requested Expiration Date of
Approval: Three years from approval
date.
Abstract: Manufacturers of passenger
vehicle lines may petition the agency for
an exemption from Part 541
requirements, if the line is equipped
with an anti-theft device as standard
equipment and meets agency criteria.
Device must be as effective as partsmarking.
Estimated Annual Burden: 1,826.
Number of Respondents: 11.
49 U.S.C. Chapter 331 requires the
Secretary of Transportation to
promulgate a theft prevention standard
to provide for the identification of
certain motor vehicles and their major
replacement parts to impede motor
vehicle theft. 49 U.S.C. Section 33106
provides for an exemption to this
identification process by petitions from
manufacturers who equip covered
vehicles with standard original
equipment antitheft devices, which the
Secretary determines are likely to be as
effective in reducing or deterring theft
as parts-marking. NHTSA may exempt a
vehicle line from the parts marking
requirement, if the manufacturer installs
an antitheft device as standard
equipment on the entire vehicle line for
which it seeks an exemption and
NHTSA determines that the antitheft
device is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft as compliance with the partsmarking requirements. In accordance
with 49 U.S.C. 33106, after model year
(MY) 2000, the number of new
exemptions is contingent on a finding
by the Attorney General as part of its
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:18 Mar 20, 2014
Jkt 232001
long-range review of effectiveness. After
consulting with DOJ, the agency
decided it could continue granting one
exemption per model year pending the
results of the long-term review.
In a final rule published on April 6,
2004, the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard was extended to
include all passenger cars and
multipurpose passenger vehicles with a
gross vehicle rating of 6,000 pounds or
less, and to light duty trucks with major
parts that are interchangeable with a
majority of the covered major parts of
multipurpose passenger vehicles.
Consistent with this DOJ consultation,
the April 6, 2004 final rule amended the
general requirements of Section 543.5 of
Chapter 49 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, allowing a manufacturer to
petition NHTSA to grant an exemption
for one additional line of its passenger
motor vehicles from the requirements of
the theft prevention standard for each
model year after MY 1996. The final
rule became effective September 1,
2006.
Prior to September 1, 2006,
manufacturers were only allowed to
petition NHTSA for high-theft vehicles
lines. In its April 6, 2004 final rule, the
agency amended part 543 to allow
vehicle manufacturers to file petitions to
exempt all vehicle lines that would
become subject to parts-marking
requirements beginning with the
effective date of the final rule. As a
result of this amendment, vehicle
manufacturers are allowed to file
petitions to exempt all vehicles lines
that would become subject to the partsmarking requirements regardless of their
theft status (high or low). While there
are approximately 21 vehicle
manufacturers, 33 petitions for
exemption from the parts-marking
requirements have been received by the
agency for MYs 2013–2015, averaging
approximately 11 responses per year.
We anticipate this to remain the average
number of yearly responses received by
the agency.
NHTSA estimates that the average
hours per submittal will be 166, for a
total annual burden of 1,826. NHTSA
estimates that the cost associated with
the burden hours is a $39.49 per hour,
for a total cost of approximately
$72,109.
Comments are invited on: Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the Department,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; the accuracy of
the Department’s estimate of the burden
of the proposed information collection;
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Lori K. Summers,
Director, Office of Crashworthiness
Standards.
[FR Doc. 2014–06215 Filed 3–20–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2013–0107; Notice 1]
Notice of Receipt of Petition for
Decision That Nonconforming 2010
Ferrari California Passenger Cars Are
Eligible for Importation
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
AGENCY:
This document announces
receipt by the National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a
petition for a decision that
nonconforming 2010 Ferrari California
passenger cars that were not originally
manufactured to comply with all
applicable Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standards (FMVSS), are eligible for
importation into the United States
because they are substantially similar to
vehicles that were originally
manufactured for sale in the United
States and that were certified by their
manufacturer as complying with the
safety standards (the U.S.-certified
version of the 2010 Ferrari California)
and they are capable of being readily
altered to conform to the standards.
DATES: The closing date for comments
on the petition is April 21, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to
the docket and notice numbers above
and be submitted by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility:
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m. e.t., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
Instructions: Comments must be
written in the English language, and be
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 55 (Friday, March 21, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15799-15800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-06215]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[U.S. DOT Docket Number NHTSA-2014-0018]
Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Request for public comment on an extension of a currently
approved collection.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can collect certain information from
the public, it must receive approval from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Under procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, before seeking OMB approval, Federal agencies must solicit
public comment on proposed collections of information, including
extensions and reinstatement of previously approved collections.
This document describes one collection of information for which
NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 20, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Comments must refer to the docket notice numbers cited at
the beginning of this notice and be submitted to Docket Management,
Room W12-140, Ground Level, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
20590 by any of the following methods.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Agency Web site: https://dms.dot.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments on the Docket Management System.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery/Courier: 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays.
Telephone: 1-800-647-5527.
Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and
docket number for this proposed collection of information. Note that
all comments received will be posted without change to https://dms.dot.gov including any personal information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://dms.dot.gov at any time or to Room W12-
140 on the ground level of the DOT Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE., West Building, Ground Floor, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Complete copies of each request for
collection of information may be obtained at no charge from Carlita
Ballard, NHTSA 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W43-439, NVS-131,
Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Ballard's telephone number is (202) 366-5222.
Please identify the relevant collection of information by referring to
its OMB Control Number.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed collection of information to OMB
for approval, it must first publish a document in the Federal Register
providing a 60-day comment period and otherwise consult with members of
the public and affected agencies concerning each proposed collection of
information.
The OMB has promulgated regulations describing what must be
included in such a document. Under OMB's regulation (at 5 CFR
1320.8(d)), an agency must ask for public comment on the following:
(i) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
[[Page 15800]]
(ii) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(iii) How to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected and;
(iv) How to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g. permitting electronic
submission of responses.
In compliance with these requirements, NHTSA asks for public
comments on the following proposed collections of information:
Title: Petitions for Exemption From the Vehicle Theft Prevention
Standard (49 CFR Part 543).
OMB Control Number: 2127-0542.
Form Number: None.
Affected Public: Motor vehicle manufacturers.
Requested Expiration Date of Approval: Three years from approval
date.
Abstract: Manufacturers of passenger vehicle lines may petition the
agency for an exemption from Part 541 requirements, if the line is
equipped with an anti-theft device as standard equipment and meets
agency criteria. Device must be as effective as parts-marking.
Estimated Annual Burden: 1,826.
Number of Respondents: 11.
49 U.S.C. Chapter 331 requires the Secretary of Transportation to
promulgate a theft prevention standard to provide for the
identification of certain motor vehicles and their major replacement
parts to impede motor vehicle theft. 49 U.S.C. Section 33106 provides
for an exemption to this identification process by petitions from
manufacturers who equip covered vehicles with standard original
equipment antitheft devices, which the Secretary determines are likely
to be as effective in reducing or deterring theft as parts-marking.
NHTSA may exempt a vehicle line from the parts marking requirement, if
the manufacturer installs an antitheft device as standard equipment on
the entire vehicle line for which it seeks an exemption and NHTSA
determines that the antitheft device is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the
parts-marking requirements. In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 33106, after
model year (MY) 2000, the number of new exemptions is contingent on a
finding by the Attorney General as part of its long-range review of
effectiveness. After consulting with DOJ, the agency decided it could
continue granting one exemption per model year pending the results of
the long-term review.
In a final rule published on April 6, 2004, the Federal Motor
Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard was extended to include all passenger
cars and multipurpose passenger vehicles with a gross vehicle rating of
6,000 pounds or less, and to light duty trucks with major parts that
are interchangeable with a majority of the covered major parts of
multipurpose passenger vehicles. Consistent with this DOJ consultation,
the April 6, 2004 final rule amended the general requirements of
Section 543.5 of Chapter 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations,
allowing a manufacturer to petition NHTSA to grant an exemption for one
additional line of its passenger motor vehicles from the requirements
of the theft prevention standard for each model year after MY 1996. The
final rule became effective September 1, 2006.
Prior to September 1, 2006, manufacturers were only allowed to
petition NHTSA for high-theft vehicles lines. In its April 6, 2004
final rule, the agency amended part 543 to allow vehicle manufacturers
to file petitions to exempt all vehicle lines that would become subject
to parts-marking requirements beginning with the effective date of the
final rule. As a result of this amendment, vehicle manufacturers are
allowed to file petitions to exempt all vehicles lines that would
become subject to the parts-marking requirements regardless of their
theft status (high or low). While there are approximately 21 vehicle
manufacturers, 33 petitions for exemption from the parts-marking
requirements have been received by the agency for MYs 2013-2015,
averaging approximately 11 responses per year. We anticipate this to
remain the average number of yearly responses received by the agency.
NHTSA estimates that the average hours per submittal will be 166,
for a total annual burden of 1,826. NHTSA estimates that the cost
associated with the burden hours is a $39.49 per hour, for a total cost
of approximately $72,109.
Comments are invited on: Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Department, including whether the information will have practical
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility
and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Lori K. Summers,
Director, Office of Crashworthiness Standards.
[FR Doc. 2014-06215 Filed 3-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P