Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming 2010 Ferrari California Passenger Cars Are Eligible for Importation, 15800-15802 [2014-06165]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
15800
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 55 / Friday, March 21, 2014 / Notices
(ii) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(iii) How to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected and;
(iv) How to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g. permitting
electronic submission of responses.
In compliance with these
requirements, NHTSA asks for public
comments on the following proposed
collections of information:
Title: Petitions for Exemption From
the Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard
(49 CFR Part 543).
OMB Control Number: 2127–0542.
Form Number: None.
Affected Public: Motor vehicle
manufacturers.
Requested Expiration Date of
Approval: Three years from approval
date.
Abstract: Manufacturers of passenger
vehicle lines may petition the agency for
an exemption from Part 541
requirements, if the line is equipped
with an anti-theft device as standard
equipment and meets agency criteria.
Device must be as effective as partsmarking.
Estimated Annual Burden: 1,826.
Number of Respondents: 11.
49 U.S.C. Chapter 331 requires the
Secretary of Transportation to
promulgate a theft prevention standard
to provide for the identification of
certain motor vehicles and their major
replacement parts to impede motor
vehicle theft. 49 U.S.C. Section 33106
provides for an exemption to this
identification process by petitions from
manufacturers who equip covered
vehicles with standard original
equipment antitheft devices, which the
Secretary determines are likely to be as
effective in reducing or deterring theft
as parts-marking. NHTSA may exempt a
vehicle line from the parts marking
requirement, if the manufacturer installs
an antitheft device as standard
equipment on the entire vehicle line for
which it seeks an exemption and
NHTSA determines that the antitheft
device is likely to be as effective in
reducing and deterring motor vehicle
theft as compliance with the partsmarking requirements. In accordance
with 49 U.S.C. 33106, after model year
(MY) 2000, the number of new
exemptions is contingent on a finding
by the Attorney General as part of its
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:18 Mar 20, 2014
Jkt 232001
long-range review of effectiveness. After
consulting with DOJ, the agency
decided it could continue granting one
exemption per model year pending the
results of the long-term review.
In a final rule published on April 6,
2004, the Federal Motor Vehicle Theft
Prevention Standard was extended to
include all passenger cars and
multipurpose passenger vehicles with a
gross vehicle rating of 6,000 pounds or
less, and to light duty trucks with major
parts that are interchangeable with a
majority of the covered major parts of
multipurpose passenger vehicles.
Consistent with this DOJ consultation,
the April 6, 2004 final rule amended the
general requirements of Section 543.5 of
Chapter 49 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, allowing a manufacturer to
petition NHTSA to grant an exemption
for one additional line of its passenger
motor vehicles from the requirements of
the theft prevention standard for each
model year after MY 1996. The final
rule became effective September 1,
2006.
Prior to September 1, 2006,
manufacturers were only allowed to
petition NHTSA for high-theft vehicles
lines. In its April 6, 2004 final rule, the
agency amended part 543 to allow
vehicle manufacturers to file petitions to
exempt all vehicle lines that would
become subject to parts-marking
requirements beginning with the
effective date of the final rule. As a
result of this amendment, vehicle
manufacturers are allowed to file
petitions to exempt all vehicles lines
that would become subject to the partsmarking requirements regardless of their
theft status (high or low). While there
are approximately 21 vehicle
manufacturers, 33 petitions for
exemption from the parts-marking
requirements have been received by the
agency for MYs 2013–2015, averaging
approximately 11 responses per year.
We anticipate this to remain the average
number of yearly responses received by
the agency.
NHTSA estimates that the average
hours per submittal will be 166, for a
total annual burden of 1,826. NHTSA
estimates that the cost associated with
the burden hours is a $39.49 per hour,
for a total cost of approximately
$72,109.
Comments are invited on: Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the Department,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; the accuracy of
the Department’s estimate of the burden
of the proposed information collection;
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Lori K. Summers,
Director, Office of Crashworthiness
Standards.
[FR Doc. 2014–06215 Filed 3–20–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2013–0107; Notice 1]
Notice of Receipt of Petition for
Decision That Nonconforming 2010
Ferrari California Passenger Cars Are
Eligible for Importation
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
AGENCY:
This document announces
receipt by the National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a
petition for a decision that
nonconforming 2010 Ferrari California
passenger cars that were not originally
manufactured to comply with all
applicable Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standards (FMVSS), are eligible for
importation into the United States
because they are substantially similar to
vehicles that were originally
manufactured for sale in the United
States and that were certified by their
manufacturer as complying with the
safety standards (the U.S.-certified
version of the 2010 Ferrari California)
and they are capable of being readily
altered to conform to the standards.
DATES: The closing date for comments
on the petition is April 21, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to
the docket and notice numbers above
and be submitted by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility:
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m. e.t., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
Instructions: Comments must be
written in the English language, and be
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 55 / Friday, March 21, 2014 / Notices
no greater than 15 pages in length,
although there is no limit to the length
of necessary attachments to the
comments. If comments are submitted
in hard copy form, please ensure that
two copies are provided. If you wish to
receive confirmation that your
comments were received, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard with
the comments. Note that all comments
received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided.
Please see the Privacy Act heading
below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78).
How to Read Comments submitted to
the Docket: You may read the comments
received by Docket Management at the
address and times given above. You may
also view the documents from the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the dockets. The docket ID
number and title of this notice are
shown at the heading of this document
notice. Please note that even after the
comment closing date, we will continue
to file relevant information in the
Docket as it becomes available. Further,
some people may submit late comments.
Accordingly, we recommend that you
periodically search the Docket for new
material.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
George Stevens, Office of Vehicle Safety
Compliance, NHTSA (202–366–5308).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a
motor vehicle that was not originally
manufactured to conform to all
applicable FMVSS shall be refused
admission into the United States unless
NHTSA has decided that the motor
vehicle is substantially similar to a
motor vehicle originally manufactured
for importation into and sale in the
United States, certified under 49 U.S.C.
30115, and of the same model year as
the model of the motor vehicle to be
compared, and is capable of being
readily altered to conform to all
applicable FMVSS.
Petitions for eligibility decisions may
be submitted by either manufacturers or
importers who have registered with
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:18 Mar 20, 2014
Jkt 232001
NHTSA pursuant to 49 CFR Part 592. As
specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA
publishes notice in the Federal Register
of each petition that it receives, and
affords interested persons an
opportunity to comment on the petition.
At the close of the comment period,
NHTSA decides, on the basis of the
petition and any comments that it has
received, whether the vehicle is eligible
for importation. The agency then
publishes this decision in the Federal
Register.
J.K. Technologies, LLC of Baltimore,
Maryland (Registered Importer 90–006)
has petitioned NHTSA to decide
whether nonconforming 2010 Ferrari
California passenger cars are eligible for
importation into the United States. The
vehicles which J.K. Technologies
believes are substantially similar are
2010 Ferrari California passenger cars
that were manufactured for sale in the
United States and certified by their
manufacturer as conforming to all
applicable FMVSS.
The petitioner claims that it compared
non-U.S. certified 2010 Ferrari
California passenger cars to their U.S.certified counterparts, and found the
vehicles to be substantially similar with
respect to compliance with most
FMVSS.
J.K. Technologies submitted
information with its petition intended to
demonstrate that non-U.S. certified 2010
Ferrari California passenger cars, as
originally manufactured, conform to
many FMVSS in the same manner as
their U.S. certified counterparts, or are
capable of being readily altered to
conform to those standards.
Specifically, the petitioner claims that
non-U.S. certified 2010 Ferrari
California passenger cars are identical to
their U.S. certified counterparts with
respect to compliance with Standard
Nos. 102 Transmission Shift Lever
Sequence, Starter Interlock, and
Transmission Braking Effect, 103
Windshield Defrosting and Defogging
Systems, 104 Windshield Wiping and
Washing Systems, 106 Brake Hoses, 113
Hood Latch System, 116 Motor Vehicle
Brake Fluids, 118 Power-Operated
Window, Partition, and Roof Panel
Systems, 124 Accelerator Control
Systems, 126 Electronic Stability
Control Systems, 135 Light Vehicle
Brake Systems, 138 Tire Pressure
Monitoring Systems, 139 New
Pneumatic Radial Tires for Light
Vehicles, 201 Occupant Protection in
Interior Impact, 202 Head Restraints,
204 Steering Control Rearward
Displacement, 205 Glazing Materials,
206 Door Locks and Door Retention
Components, 210 Seat Belt Assembly
Anchorages, 212 Windshield Mounting,
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15801
216 Roof Crush Resistance, 219
Windshield Zone Intrusion, 225 Child
Restraint Anchorage Systems, and 302
Flammability of Interior Materials.
The petitioner also contends that the
vehicles are capable of being readily
altered to meet the following standards,
in the manner indicated:
Standard No. 101 Controls and
Displays: Replacement of the instrument
cluster with a U.S.-model component
and reprogramming of the vehicle
computer.
Standard No. 108 Lamps, Reflective
Devices and Associated Equipment:
Replacement of the headlamps, side
marker lamps, and tail lamps with U.S.model components and reprogramming
the vehicle computer to activate
necessary systems.
Standard No. 110 Tire Selection and
Rims for Motor Vehicles with a GVWR
of 4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds) or
Less: Installation of a tire information
placard.
Standard No. 111 Rearview Mirrors:
Replacement of the passenger side
rearview mirror with a U.S.-model
component or inscription of the
required warning statement on the face
of that mirror.
Standard No. 114 Theft Protection
and Rollaway Prevention:
Reprogramming the vehicle computer to
activate the key warning system.
Standard No. 118 Power-Operated
Window, Partition, and Roof Panel
Systems: Reprogramming of the vehicle
computer.
Standard No. 207 Seating Systems:
Replacement of non-conforming seating
systems with parts complying with
advanced airbag regulations from U.S.model of the vehicle.
Standard No. 208 Occupant Crash
Protection: Inspection to confirm that
belts, airbags, sensors, control units,
wiring harnesses, knee bolsters, and
braces bear U.S.-model part numbers.
Non-U.S.-model parts will be replaced
with U.S.-model components to render
the vehicle identical to the U.S.-model
in regards to the standard. Reprogram
the vehicle computer to activate the seat
belt warning system.
Standard No. 209 Seat Belt
Assemblies: Inspection of seatbelts and
replacement of non-conforming belts
with U.S.-model components.
Standard No. 214 Side Impact
Protection: Inspect each vehicle for the
presence of compliant door panel
airbags as well as other side impact
components, replacing non-conforming
parts with U.S.-model components.
Standard No. 301 Fuel System
Integrity: Inspection of all vehicles and
replacement of any non U.S.-model fuel
system components with U.S.-model
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
15802
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 55 / Friday, March 21, 2014 / Notices
components as necessary to conform to
the requirements of FMVSS No. 301.
Standard No. 401 Interior Trunk
Release: Installation of U.S.-model
interior trunk release components.
The petitioner states that the bumpers
and bumper support structure are
identical to that of the U.S. certified
model. However, the bumper
reinforcements and brackets must be
inspected to ensure that the correct
components were installed prior to
importation. If not, they must be
replaced with U.S.-model components
to comply with 49 CFR Part 581.
The petitioner additionally states that
a vehicle identification plate must be
affixed to the vehicles near the left
windshield post to meet the
requirements of 49 CFR Part 565.
Because the subject petition covers
nonconforming vehicles that have been
manufactured on or after September 1,
2006, compliance with the advanced air
bag requirements of FMVSS No. 208 is
of significant concern to the agency.
NHTSA is therefore particularly
interested in comments regarding the
ability of a Registered Importer to
readily alter the subject vehicles to fully
meet the driver and front outboard
passenger frontal crash protection and
child passenger protection requirements
of FMVSS No. 208. The following is a
partial listing of the components that
may be affected:
a. Driver’s frontal air bag module
b. Passenger frontal air bag module
c. Passenger frontal air bag cover
d. Knee air bags
e. Knee bolsters
f. Passenger outboard frontal seat belt
system
g. Driver and front outboard seat
assemblies including seat tracks and
internal seat components
h. Steering wheel components,
including the clock spring assembly,
the steering column, and all
connecting components
i. Instrument panel
j. Instrument panel support structure
(i.e. cross beam)
k. Occupant sensing and classification
systems, including sensors and
processors
l. Restraint control modules
m. Passenger air bag status indicator
light system, including related display
components and wiring
n. Wiring harnesses between the
restraint control module, occupant
classification system and restraint
system components
o. Control system computer software
and firmware
All comments received before the
close of business on the closing date
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:18 Mar 20, 2014
Jkt 232001
indicated above will be considered, and
will be available for examination in the
docket at the above addresses both
before and after that date. To the extent
possible, comments filed after the
closing date will also be considered.
Notice of final action on the petition
will be published in the Federal
Register pursuant to the authority
indicated below.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A),
(a)(1)(B), and (b)(1); 49 CFR 593.7; delegation
of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8.
Dated: March 10, 2014.
Coleman Sachs,
Acting Director, Office of Vehicle Safety
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014–06165 Filed 3–20–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2013–0108; Notice 1]
Notice of Receipt of Petition for
Decision That Nonconforming 2011
Ferrari 599 GTO Passenger Cars Are
Eligible for Importation
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
AGENCY:
This document announces
receipt by the National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a
petition for a decision that
nonconforming 2011 Ferrari 599 GTO
passenger cars that were not originally
manufactured to comply with all
applicable Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standards (FMVSS), are eligible for
importation into the United States
because they are substantially similar to
vehicles that were originally
manufactured for sale in the United
States and that were certified by their
manufacturer as complying with the
safety standards (the U.S.-certified
version of the 2011 Ferrari 599 GTO)
and they are capable of being readily
altered to conform to the standards.
DATES: The closing date for comments
on the petition is April 21, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to
the docket and notice numbers above
and be submitted by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility:
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., between
9 a.m. and 5 p.m. e.t., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
Instructions: Comments must be
written in the English language, and be
no greater than 15 pages in length,
although there is no limit to the length
of necessary attachments to the
comments. If comments are submitted
in hard copy form, please ensure that
two copies are provided. If you wish to
receive confirmation that your
comments were received, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard with
the comments. Note that all comments
received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided.
Please see the Privacy Act heading
below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search
the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR
19477–78).
How to Read Comments submitted to
the Docket: You may read the comments
received by Docket Management at the
address and times given above. You may
also view the documents from the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the dockets. The docket ID
number and title of this notice are
shown at the heading of this document
notice. Please note that even after the
comment closing date, we will continue
to file relevant information in the
Docket as it becomes available. Further,
some people may submit late comments.
Accordingly, we recommend that you
periodically search the Docket for new
material.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
George Stevens, Office of Vehicle Safety
Compliance, NHTSA (202–366–5308).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a
motor vehicle that was not originally
manufactured to conform to all
applicable FMVSS shall be refused
admission into the United States unless
NHTSA has decided that the motor
vehicle is substantially similar to a
motor vehicle originally manufactured
E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM
21MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 55 (Friday, March 21, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15800-15802]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-06165]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2013-0107; Notice 1]
Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming
2010 Ferrari California Passenger Cars Are Eligible for Importation
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Receipt of petition.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document announces receipt by the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a petition for a decision that
nonconforming 2010 Ferrari California passenger cars that were not
originally manufactured to comply with all applicable Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS), are eligible for importation into the
United States because they are substantially similar to vehicles that
were originally manufactured for sale in the United States and that
were certified by their manufacturer as complying with the safety
standards (the U.S.-certified version of the 2010 Ferrari California)
and they are capable of being readily altered to conform to the
standards.
DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is April 21, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to the docket and notice numbers above
and be submitted by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Mail: Docket Management Facility: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. e.t.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Instructions: Comments must be written in the English language, and
be
[[Page 15801]]
no greater than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the
length of necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are
submitted in hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are
provided. If you wish to receive confirmation that your comments were
received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the
comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading below.
Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
How to Read Comments submitted to the Docket: You may read the
comments received by Docket Management at the address and times given
above. You may also view the documents from the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for accessing the
dockets. The docket ID number and title of this notice are shown at the
heading of this document notice. Please note that even after the
comment closing date, we will continue to file relevant information in
the Docket as it becomes available. Further, some people may submit
late comments. Accordingly, we recommend that you periodically search
the Docket for new material.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Stevens, Office of Vehicle
Safety Compliance, NHTSA (202-366-5308).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a motor vehicle that was not
originally manufactured to conform to all applicable FMVSS shall be
refused admission into the United States unless NHTSA has decided that
the motor vehicle is substantially similar to a motor vehicle
originally manufactured for importation into and sale in the United
States, certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115, and of the same model year as
the model of the motor vehicle to be compared, and is capable of being
readily altered to conform to all applicable FMVSS.
Petitions for eligibility decisions may be submitted by either
manufacturers or importers who have registered with NHTSA pursuant to
49 CFR Part 592. As specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA publishes notice
in the Federal Register of each petition that it receives, and affords
interested persons an opportunity to comment on the petition. At the
close of the comment period, NHTSA decides, on the basis of the
petition and any comments that it has received, whether the vehicle is
eligible for importation. The agency then publishes this decision in
the Federal Register.
J.K. Technologies, LLC of Baltimore, Maryland (Registered Importer
90-006) has petitioned NHTSA to decide whether nonconforming 2010
Ferrari California passenger cars are eligible for importation into the
United States. The vehicles which J.K. Technologies believes are
substantially similar are 2010 Ferrari California passenger cars that
were manufactured for sale in the United States and certified by their
manufacturer as conforming to all applicable FMVSS.
The petitioner claims that it compared non-U.S. certified 2010
Ferrari California passenger cars to their U.S.-certified counterparts,
and found the vehicles to be substantially similar with respect to
compliance with most FMVSS.
J.K. Technologies submitted information with its petition intended
to demonstrate that non-U.S. certified 2010 Ferrari California
passenger cars, as originally manufactured, conform to many FMVSS in
the same manner as their U.S. certified counterparts, or are capable of
being readily altered to conform to those standards. Specifically, the
petitioner claims that non-U.S. certified 2010 Ferrari California
passenger cars are identical to their U.S. certified counterparts with
respect to compliance with Standard Nos. 102 Transmission Shift Lever
Sequence, Starter Interlock, and Transmission Braking Effect, 103
Windshield Defrosting and Defogging Systems, 104 Windshield Wiping and
Washing Systems, 106 Brake Hoses, 113 Hood Latch System, 116 Motor
Vehicle Brake Fluids, 118 Power-Operated Window, Partition, and Roof
Panel Systems, 124 Accelerator Control Systems, 126 Electronic
Stability Control Systems, 135 Light Vehicle Brake Systems, 138 Tire
Pressure Monitoring Systems, 139 New Pneumatic Radial Tires for Light
Vehicles, 201 Occupant Protection in Interior Impact, 202 Head
Restraints, 204 Steering Control Rearward Displacement, 205 Glazing
Materials, 206 Door Locks and Door Retention Components, 210 Seat Belt
Assembly Anchorages, 212 Windshield Mounting, 216 Roof Crush
Resistance, 219 Windshield Zone Intrusion, 225 Child Restraint
Anchorage Systems, and 302 Flammability of Interior Materials.
The petitioner also contends that the vehicles are capable of being
readily altered to meet the following standards, in the manner
indicated:
Standard No. 101 Controls and Displays: Replacement of the
instrument cluster with a U.S.-model component and reprogramming of the
vehicle computer.
Standard No. 108 Lamps, Reflective Devices and Associated
Equipment: Replacement of the headlamps, side marker lamps, and tail
lamps with U.S.-model components and reprogramming the vehicle computer
to activate necessary systems.
Standard No. 110 Tire Selection and Rims for Motor Vehicles with a
GVWR of 4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds) or Less: Installation of a tire
information placard.
Standard No. 111 Rearview Mirrors: Replacement of the passenger
side rearview mirror with a U.S.-model component or inscription of the
required warning statement on the face of that mirror.
Standard No. 114 Theft Protection and Rollaway Prevention:
Reprogramming the vehicle computer to activate the key warning system.
Standard No. 118 Power-Operated Window, Partition, and Roof Panel
Systems: Reprogramming of the vehicle computer.
Standard No. 207 Seating Systems: Replacement of non-conforming
seating systems with parts complying with advanced airbag regulations
from U.S.-model of the vehicle.
Standard No. 208 Occupant Crash Protection: Inspection to confirm
that belts, airbags, sensors, control units, wiring harnesses, knee
bolsters, and braces bear U.S.-model part numbers. Non-U.S.-model parts
will be replaced with U.S.-model components to render the vehicle
identical to the U.S.-model in regards to the standard. Reprogram the
vehicle computer to activate the seat belt warning system.
Standard No. 209 Seat Belt Assemblies: Inspection of seatbelts and
replacement of non-conforming belts with U.S.-model components.
Standard No. 214 Side Impact Protection: Inspect each vehicle for
the presence of compliant door panel airbags as well as other side
impact components, replacing non-conforming parts with U.S.-model
components.
Standard No. 301 Fuel System Integrity: Inspection of all vehicles
and replacement of any non U.S.-model fuel system components with U.S.-
model
[[Page 15802]]
components as necessary to conform to the requirements of FMVSS No.
301.
Standard No. 401 Interior Trunk Release: Installation of U.S.-model
interior trunk release components.
The petitioner states that the bumpers and bumper support structure
are identical to that of the U.S. certified model. However, the bumper
reinforcements and brackets must be inspected to ensure that the
correct components were installed prior to importation. If not, they
must be replaced with U.S.-model components to comply with 49 CFR Part
581.
The petitioner additionally states that a vehicle identification
plate must be affixed to the vehicles near the left windshield post to
meet the requirements of 49 CFR Part 565.
Because the subject petition covers nonconforming vehicles that
have been manufactured on or after September 1, 2006, compliance with
the advanced air bag requirements of FMVSS No. 208 is of significant
concern to the agency. NHTSA is therefore particularly interested in
comments regarding the ability of a Registered Importer to readily
alter the subject vehicles to fully meet the driver and front outboard
passenger frontal crash protection and child passenger protection
requirements of FMVSS No. 208. The following is a partial listing of
the components that may be affected:
a. Driver's frontal air bag module
b. Passenger frontal air bag module
c. Passenger frontal air bag cover
d. Knee air bags
e. Knee bolsters
f. Passenger outboard frontal seat belt system
g. Driver and front outboard seat assemblies including seat tracks and
internal seat components
h. Steering wheel components, including the clock spring assembly, the
steering column, and all connecting components
i. Instrument panel
j. Instrument panel support structure (i.e. cross beam)
k. Occupant sensing and classification systems, including sensors and
processors
l. Restraint control modules
m. Passenger air bag status indicator light system, including related
display components and wiring
n. Wiring harnesses between the restraint control module, occupant
classification system and restraint system components
o. Control system computer software and firmware
All comments received before the close of business on the closing
date indicated above will be considered, and will be available for
examination in the docket at the above addresses both before and after
that date. To the extent possible, comments filed after the closing
date will also be considered. Notice of final action on the petition
will be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority
indicated below.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), (a)(1)(B), and (b)(1); 49
CFR 593.7; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8.
Dated: March 10, 2014.
Coleman Sachs,
Acting Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2014-06165 Filed 3-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
