Certain Wireless Communications Equipment and Articles Therein; Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Joint Motion To Terminate the Investigation Based on a Settlement Agreement; Termination of Investigation, 14535-14536 [2014-05634]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 50 / Friday, March 14, 2014 / Notices
Federal and state submerged lands. The
onshore components, including the
onshore interconnection cable, fiber
optic cable, switch cabinet, and
interconnection station would be
located entirely within the boundary of
Camp Pendleton. Construction would be
supported by construction staging
area(s) and a construction port. Onshore
support facilities would be located at
existing waterfront industrial or
commercial sites in the cities of Virginia
Beach, Norfolk, and/or Newport News,
Virginia.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2. Proposed Action and Scope of
Analysis
The proposed action that will be the
subject of the EA is the approval of the
RAP. In addition to the no action
alternative (disapproval of the RAP),
other alternatives may be considered,
such as exclusion of certain areas from
project siting or modification of project
activities. The EA will consider the
reasonably foreseeable environmental
consequences associated with the
proposed project, including the impacts
of the construction, operation,
maintenance, and decommissioning of
the WTGs and cables, including the
impacts of noise, presence of structures,
bottom disturbance, vessel traffic, and
onshore activities.
This notice starts the scoping process
for the EA and solicits information
regarding important environmental
issues and alternatives that should be
considered in the EA. Additionally,
BOEM will use the scoping process to
identify and eliminate from study issues
that are not significant or issues that
have been analyzed by prior
environmental reviews.
It is BOEM’s intention to prepare an
EA that informs all Federal decisions,
including those by the Department of
Energy and the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, which are needed to
determine whether and, if so, how the
proposed action will proceed (40 CFR
1501.6).
BOEM will use responses to this
notice and the EA public input process
to satisfy the public involvement
requirements of the National Historic
Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470f), as
provided in 36 CFR 800.2(d)(3), and is
seeking information from the public on
the identification of historic properties
that might be impacted by VOWTAP.
The analyses contained within the EA
also will support compliance with other
environmental statutes (e.g., Endangered
Species Act, Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act, and
Marine Mammal Protection Act).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:18 Mar 13, 2014
Jkt 232001
3. Cooperating Agencies
BOEM invites Federal, state, and local
government agencies, as well as tribal
governments, to consider becoming
cooperating agencies in the preparation
of this EA. Council on Environmental
Quality (CEQ) regulations implementing
the procedural provisions of NEPA
define cooperating agencies as those
with ‘‘jurisdiction by law or special
expertise’’ (40 CFR 1508.5). Potential
cooperating agencies should consider
their authority and capacity to assume
the responsibilities of a cooperating
agency and remember that an agency’s
role in the environmental analysis
neither enlarges nor diminishes the final
decisionmaking authority of any other
agency involved in the NEPA process.
Upon request, BOEM will provide
potential cooperating agencies with a
draft Memorandum of Agreement that
includes a schedule with critical action
dates and milestones, mutual
responsibilities, designated points of
contact, and expectations for handling
pre-decisional information. Agencies
should also consider the ‘‘Factors for
Determining Cooperating Agency
Status’’ in Attachment 1 to CEQ’s
January 30, 2002, Memorandum for the
Heads of Federal Agencies: Cooperating
Agencies in Implementing the
Procedural Requirements of the NEPA.
A copy of this document is available at:
https://ceg.hss.doe.gov/nepa/regs/
cooperating/
cooperatingagenciesmemorandum.html
and at: https://ceg.hss.doe.gov/nepa/
regs/cooperating/
cooperatingagencymemofactors.html.
BOEM, as the lead agency, will not
provide financial assistance to
cooperating agencies. Even if an
organization is not a cooperating
agency, opportunities will exist to
provide information and comments to
BOEM during the normal public input
phases of the NEPA/EA process.
4. Comments
Federal, State, local government
agencies, tribal governments, and other
interested parties are requested to send
their written comments on the
important issues to be considered in the
EA by either of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. In the entry
titled ‘‘Enter Keyword or ID,’’ enter
BOEM–2014–0009, and then click
‘‘search.’’ Follow the instructions to
submit public comments and view
supporting and related materials
available for this notice;
2. By U.S. Postal Service or other
delivery service, send your comments
and information to the following
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14535
address: Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management, Office of Renewable
Energy Programs, 381 Elden Street, HM
1328, Herndon, Virginia 20170–4817; or
3. In person at the EA public scoping
meeting.
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comments
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: March 3, 2014.
Tommy P. Beaudreau,
Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management.
[FR Doc. 2014–05683 Filed 3–13–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–866]
Certain Wireless Communications
Equipment and Articles Therein;
Commission Determination Not To
Review an Initial Determination
Granting a Joint Motion To Terminate
the Investigation Based on a
Settlement Agreement; Termination of
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review the presiding administrative law
judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination
(‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 62) granting a joint
motion to terminate the abovereferenced investigation based on a
settlement agreement. The investigation
is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Megan M. Valentine, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–2301. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
14MRN1
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
14536
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 50 / Friday, March 14, 2014 / Notices
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on January 31, 2013, based on a
Complaint filed by Samsung Electronics
Co., Ltd. of Seoul, Republic of Korea,
and Samsung Telecommunications
America, LLC of Richardson, Texas
(collectively ‘‘Samsung’’). 78 FR 6837–
38 (Jan. 31, 2013). The complaint alleges
violations of section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, in the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after
importation of certain wireless
communications equipment and articles
therein by reason of infringement of
certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos.
7,782,749; 8,165,081; 8,208,438 (‘‘the
’438 patent’’); 8,228,827; 6,617,929;
6,767,813 (‘‘the ’813 patent’’); and
6,865,682. The complaint further alleges
the existence of a domestic industry.
The Commission’s notice of
investigation named as respondents
Ericsson Inc. of Plano, Texas and
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson of
Stockholm, Sweden (collectively,
‘‘Ericsson’’). The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations was also named as a
party. The Commission previously
terminated the investigation with
respect to the ’813 patent and the ’438
patent. Notice (July 12, 2013); Notice
(Oct. 25, 2013).
On January 27, 2014, Samsung and
Ericsson filed a joint motion to
terminate the investigation in its
entirety based upon a settlement
agreement. On January 29, 2014,
Samsung and Ericsson filed a
supplement to their motion, attaching a
revised public version of the Agreement.
On January 30, 2014, the Commission
investigative attorney (‘‘IA’’) filed a
response in support of the motion.
On February 10, 2014, the ALJ issued
the subject ID, granting the joint motion
to terminate the investigation in its
entirety. The ALJ found that the joint
motion complied with the requirements
of section 210.21(b)(1) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 210.21(b)(1)) and
that there are no extraordinary
circumstances that would prevent the
requested terminations. The ALJ agreed
with movants and the IA that granting
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:18 Mar 13, 2014
Jkt 232001
the motion would not be contrary to the
public interest. No petitions for review
were filed.
The Commission has determined not
to review the ID.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR Part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 11, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014–05634 Filed 3–13–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–749 (Third
Review)]
Persulfates From China; Determination
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year review, the
United States International Trade
Commission (Commission) determines,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that
revocation of the antidumping duty
order on persulfates from China would
be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a
reasonably foreseeable time.
Background
The Commission instituted this
review on March 1, 2013 (78 FR 13891,
corrected 78 FR 14591, March 6, 2013)
and determined on June 4, 2013, that it
would conduct a full review (78 FR
35314, June 12, 2013). Notice of the
scheduling of the Commission’s review
and of a public hearing to be held in
connection therewith was given by
posting copies of the notice in the Office
of the Secretary, U.S. International
Trade Commission, Washington, DC,
and by publishing the notice in the
Federal Register on August 27, 2013 (78
FR 52969), revised on October 28, 2013
(78 FR 64244). The hearing was held in
Washington, DC, on January 16, 2014,
and all persons who requested the
opportunity were permitted to appear in
person or by counsel.
The Commission completed and filed
its determination in this review on
March 10, 2014. The views of the
Commission are contained in USITC
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Publication 4456 (March 2014), entitled
Persulfates From China: Investigation
No. 731–TA–749 (Third Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 10, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014–05556 Filed 3–13–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–889]
Certain Wireless Devices, Including
Mobile Phones and Tablets;
Commission Determination Not To
Review an Initial Determination
Granting a Joint Motion To Terminate
the Investigation Based on a
Settlement Agreement; Termination of
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review the presiding administrative law
judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination
(‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 10) granting a joint
motion to terminate the abovereferenced investigation based on a
settlement agreement. The investigation
is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Megan M. Valentine, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–2301. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on August 5, 2013, based on a
Complaint filed by Pragmatus Mobile,
LLC of Alexandria, Virginia
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14MRN1.SGM
14MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 50 (Friday, March 14, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14535-14536]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-05634]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-866]
Certain Wireless Communications Equipment and Articles Therein;
Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination
Granting a Joint Motion To Terminate the Investigation Based on a
Settlement Agreement; Termination of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative
law judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 62)
granting a joint motion to terminate the above-referenced investigation
based on a settlement agreement. The investigation is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Megan M. Valentine, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2301. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission
[[Page 14536]]
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202)
205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on January 31, 2013, based on a Complaint filed by Samsung Electronics
Co., Ltd. of Seoul, Republic of Korea, and Samsung Telecommunications
America, LLC of Richardson, Texas (collectively ``Samsung''). 78 FR
6837-38 (Jan. 31, 2013). The complaint alleges violations of section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after importation of certain wireless
communications equipment and articles therein by reason of infringement
of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,782,749; 8,165,081; 8,208,438
(``the '438 patent''); 8,228,827; 6,617,929; 6,767,813 (``the '813
patent''); and 6,865,682. The complaint further alleges the existence
of a domestic industry. The Commission's notice of investigation named
as respondents Ericsson Inc. of Plano, Texas and Telefonaktiebolaget LM
Ericsson of Stockholm, Sweden (collectively, ``Ericsson''). The Office
of Unfair Import Investigations was also named as a party. The
Commission previously terminated the investigation with respect to the
'813 patent and the '438 patent. Notice (July 12, 2013); Notice (Oct.
25, 2013).
On January 27, 2014, Samsung and Ericsson filed a joint motion to
terminate the investigation in its entirety based upon a settlement
agreement. On January 29, 2014, Samsung and Ericsson filed a supplement
to their motion, attaching a revised public version of the Agreement.
On January 30, 2014, the Commission investigative attorney (``IA'')
filed a response in support of the motion.
On February 10, 2014, the ALJ issued the subject ID, granting the
joint motion to terminate the investigation in its entirety. The ALJ
found that the joint motion complied with the requirements of section
210.21(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 210.21(b)(1)) and that there are no extraordinary circumstances
that would prevent the requested terminations. The ALJ agreed with
movants and the IA that granting the motion would not be contrary to
the public interest. No petitions for review were filed.
The Commission has determined not to review the ID.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
Part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 11, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014-05634 Filed 3-13-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P