Certain Audiovisual Components and Products Containing the Same; Commission Determination To Grant the Motions to Partially Terminate the Investigation as to All Claims Relating to U.S. Patent Nos. 5,780,087, 6,982,663, and 6,707,867; Final Determination of No Violation With Respect to U.S. Patent No. 6,452,958; Termination of the Investigation, 13328-13329 [2014-05072]
Download as PDF
13328
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 46 / Monday, March 10, 2014 / Notices
calling the Federal Relay Service at 800–
877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Today’s
Federal Register notice announces that
HUD has posted its FY 2014 and FY
2015 Comprehensive Housing
Counseling Grant Program NOFA on
https://www.Grants.gov and https://
portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/
program_offices/administration/grants/
fundsavail. Approximately $38.5
million is expected to be available for
eligible applicants under this NOFA for
FY 2014 through the Transportation,
Housing and Urban Development, and
Related Agencies Appropriations Act,
2014. HUD intends to award FY 2015
Comprehensive Housing Counseling
Program Grants from this NOFA,
provided such funds are appropriated
by Congress. The application deadline
date is April 7, 2014. Applications must
be received by Grants.gov no later than
11:59:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the
application deadline date. See Section
IV of the General Section, regarding
application procedures, timely filing
requirements, and grace period policy.
HUD may issue a technical correction to
this NOFA if necessary. Any such
technical correction will provide
detailed instructions for Applicants
regarding the resubmission of
applications to address the revised
NOFA requirements.
Dated: March 4, 2014.
Anne M. Morillon,
Director, Grants Management and Oversight
Division, Office of Strategic Planning and
Management.
[FR Doc. 2014–05093 Filed 3–7–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5700–N–28]
Notice of HUD’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2013
Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA)
for Section 811 Project Rental
Assistance Program
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing
Commissioner, HUD.
ACTION: Notice of Funding Availability
(NOFA) for HUD’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2013
Section 811 Supportive Housing for
Persons with Disabilities (Section 811)
Project Rental Assistance (PRA)
Program.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
This notice announces that
HUD has posted on https://
www.Grants.gov and https://
www.HUD.gov a Notice of Funding
Availability (NOFA) for HUD’s Fiscal
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 Mar 07, 2014
Jkt 232001
Year (FY) 2013 Section 811 Supportive
Housing for Persons with Disabilities
(Section 811) Project Rental Assistance
(PRA) Program.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions regarding specific program
requirements should be directed to
Lessie Powell Evans, Office of Housing
Assistance and Grant Administration,
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 Seventh Street SW.,
Room 6234, Washington, DC 20410 or to
PRAapplications@hud.gov. HUD
expects to hold an information webcast
via satellite or a webinar for potential
applicants to learn more about the
Program and preparation of an
application. For more information about
the date and time of this webcast,
consult the HUD Web site at
www.hud.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Today’s
Federal Register notice announces that
HUD has posted its FY 2013 Section 811
Supportive Housing for Persons with
Disabilities (Section 811) Project Rental
Assistance (PRA) Program on https://
www.Grants.gov and https://
portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/
program_offices/administration/grants/
fundsavail. This NOFA comprises both
the (FY) 2013 General Section posted on
www.Grants.gov on August 8, 2012, and
this program NOFA. This NOFA
announces the availability of Section
811 PRA funding for state housing or
other appropriate housing agencies to
provide project-based rental assistance
in the development of supportive
housing for extremely low-income
persons with disabilities. To be eligible
for Section 811 PRA funds, these
housing agencies must have a formal
partnership with the State health and
human service agency and the state
agency designated to administer or
supervise the administration of the State
plan for medical assistance under Title
XIX of the Social Security Act
(Medicaid) who will be providing
appropriate services and supports
directly to residents. In many states, this
is the same agency, so the NOFA will
refer to the ‘‘State Health and Human
Services/Medicaid Agency’’. This
Section 811 PRA program is designed to
develop and support sustainable
partnerships with state housing agencies
and State Health and Human Services/
Medicaid agencies that will result in
long-term strategies to provide
permanent affordable rental housing for
people with disabilities receiving
assistance under Title XIX of the Social
Security Act or other individuals with
disabilities receiving comparable longterm services and supports in the
community. The application deadline
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
date is 11:59:59 p.m. on May 5, 2014.
Applications must be received by
Grants.gov no later than 11:59:59 p.m.
eastern time on the application deadline
date. Approximately $100 million is
available in FY 2013 and approximately
$20 million in FY 2014, totaling $120
million in funding. Additional funding
may be available based on carry-over
funds from prior years.
Dated: March 4, 2014.
Anne M. Morillon,
Director, Grants Management and Oversight
Division, Office of Strategic Planning and
Management.
[FR Doc. 2014–05096 Filed 3–7–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–837]
Certain Audiovisual Components and
Products Containing the Same;
Commission Determination To Grant
the Motions to Partially Terminate the
Investigation as to All Claims Relating
to U.S. Patent Nos. 5,780,087,
6,982,663, and 6,707,867; Final
Determination of No Violation With
Respect to U.S. Patent No. 6,452,958;
Termination of the Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to grant the
joint motion to partially terminate the
investigation as to U.S. Patent Nos.
5,780,087 (‘‘the ’087 patent’’) and
6,982,663 (‘‘the ’663 patent’’) based
upon a settlement agreement. The
Commission has also determined to
terminate the investigation as to expired
U.S. Patent No. 6,707,867 (‘‘the ’867
patent’’) and to take no position on the
findings as to the same. The
Commission has further determined that
no violation of section 337 has been
proven with respect to U.S. Patent No.
6,452,958 (‘‘the ’958 patent’’). The
investigation is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cathy Chen, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–2392. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM
10MRN1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 46 / Monday, March 10, 2014 / Notices
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on April 11, 2012, based on a complaint
filed by complainants LSI Corporation
of Milpitas, California, and Agere
Systems Inc. of Allentown,
Pennsylvania (collectively, ‘‘LSI’’). 77
FR 22803 (Apr. 11, 2012). The
complaint, as amended, alleged
violations of section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C.
1337), in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain audiovisual
components and products containing
the same by reason of infringement of
certain claims of the ’087, ’958, ’867,
and ’663 patents. The Commission’s
notice of investigation named several
respondents, including Realtek
Semiconductor Corporation of Hsinchu,
Taiwan (‘‘Realtek’’); Funai Corporation,
Inc. of Rutherford, New Jersey; Funai
Electric Co., Ltd. of Osaka, Japan; P&F
USA, Inc. of Alpharetta, Georgia; and
Funai Service Corporation of Groveport,
Ohio (collectively, ‘‘Funai’’). Other
respondents and certain patent claims
were terminated from the investigation
previously. No Commission
investigative attorney is participating in
the investigation.
The ALJ issued his final initial
determination (‘‘ID’’) with respect to the
remaining respondents and claims on
July 18, 2013. The ALJ found that a
violation of section 337 had been
proven with respect to claims 1, 5, 7–
11, and 16 of the ’087 patent. The ALJ
found no violation of section 337 had
been proven with respect to any
asserted claims of the ’958, ’867, and
’663 patents. On July 31, 2013, the ALJ
issued a recommended determination
(‘‘RD’’) on remedy and bonding.
On October 17, 2013, the Commission
determined to review the final ID in its
entirety and requested additional
briefing from the parties on certain
issues. The Commission also solicited
briefing from the parties and from the
public on the issues of remedy, the
public interest, and bonding. On
November 1, 2013, the parties filed
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 Mar 07, 2014
Jkt 232001
briefs addressing the Commission’s
questions and the issues of remedy, the
public interest, and bonding. Also on
November 1, 2013, non-parties Barnes &
Noble, Inc.; InterDigital, Inc.; Intel
Corporation; and Cisco Systems, Inc.
filed comments on the public interest.
On November 12, 2013, the parties filed
reply briefs in connection with the
Commission’s notice.
On January 17, 2014, complainants
and respondent Funai jointly filed a
motion to partially terminate the
investigation as to all claims relating to
the ’087 and the ’663 patents based on
a settlement agreement. Respondent
Realtek, which was not accused of
violating section 337 in regard to the
’087 and the ’663 patents, did not file a
response.
On February 6, 2014, complainants
filed a motion to partially terminate the
investigation as to the ’867 patent and
to vacate the ALJ’s determination as to
same due to the imminent expiration of
that patent on February 23, 2014.
Respondents opposed vacatur on
February 12, 2014.
Having examined the record of this
investigation, the Commission has
determined to grant the joint motion to
partially terminate the investigation as
to the ’087 and the ’663 patents based
on a settlement agreement. We find no
indication that termination of the
investigation with respect to these
patents based on settlement will
adversely impact the public interest.
With respect to the ’867 patent,
because the Commission grants
prospective relief only, when the ’867
patent expired on February 23, 2014, the
investigation concerning the ’867 patent
became moot. Therefore, the
Commission has determined to take no
position on the final ID’s findings
pertaining to the ’867 patent. See Beloit
Corp. v. Valmet Oy, 742 F.2d 1421, 1423
(Fed. Cir. 1984).
With respect to the remaining asserted
patent—the ’958 patent—the
Commission has determined that no
violation of section 337 has been proven
based on the record of this investigation.
Specifically, the Commission affirms the
ID’s finding that the accused articles
were not proven to infringe the asserted
claims of the ’958 patent. In addition,
the Commission reverses the ALJ’s
determination that the asserted ’958
claims were not proven invalid. The
Commission has also determined to take
no position on the ALJ’s determination
with respect to the Respondents’ RAND
and equitable defenses. See Beloit Corp.,
742 F.2d at 1423.
Furthermore, the Commission has
determined that complainants have not
proven the existence of a domestic
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13329
industry with respect to the ’958 patent.
The Commission affirms the ALJ’s
finding that the Nokia domestic
industry articles were not shown to
practice the claims of the ’958 patent
and, therefore, complainants did not
prove a domestic industry under 19
U.S.C. 1337(a)(3)(A)–(B). Because
complainants have not demonstrated
the existence of an article protected by
the ’958 patent, the Commission has
also determined to reverse the ALJ’s
finding that a domestic industry exists
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337(a)(3)(C)
through complainants’ licensing
activities. See Certain Computers and
Computer Peripheral Devices, and
Components Thereof, and Products
Containing Same, Inv. No. 337–TA–841,
Comm’n Op. at 32 (Jan. 9, 2014).
A Commission opinion will be
forthcoming.
The Commission has terminated this
investigation. The authority for the
Commission’s determination is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C.
1337), and in Part 210 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR Part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 4, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014–05072 Filed 3–7–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE
UNITED STATES
Meeting of the Judicial Conference
Committee on Rules of Practice and
Procedure
Judicial Conference of the
United States Advisory Committee on
Rules of Civil Procedure.
ACTION: Notice of Open Meeting.
AGENCY:
The Advisory Committee on
Rules of Civil Procedure will hold a
two-day meeting. The meeting will be
open to public observation but not
participation.
SUMMARY:
April 10–11, 2014.
8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
ADDRESSES: Lewis & Clark Law School,
10015 SW. Terwilliger Blvd., Portland,
OR 97219.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jonathan C. Rose, Secretary and Chief
Rules Officer, Rules Committee Support
Office, Administrative Office of the
United States Courts, Washington, DC
20544, telephone (202) 502–1820.
DATES:
TIME:
E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM
10MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 46 (Monday, March 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13328-13329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-05072]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-837]
Certain Audiovisual Components and Products Containing the Same;
Commission Determination To Grant the Motions to Partially Terminate
the Investigation as to All Claims Relating to U.S. Patent Nos.
5,780,087, 6,982,663, and 6,707,867; Final Determination of No
Violation With Respect to U.S. Patent No. 6,452,958; Termination of the
Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to grant the joint motion to partially
terminate the investigation as to U.S. Patent Nos. 5,780,087 (``the
'087 patent'') and 6,982,663 (``the '663 patent'') based upon a
settlement agreement. The Commission has also determined to terminate
the investigation as to expired U.S. Patent No. 6,707,867 (``the '867
patent'') and to take no position on the findings as to the same. The
Commission has further determined that no violation of section 337 has
been proven with respect to U.S. Patent No. 6,452,958 (``the '958
patent''). The investigation is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathy Chen, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2392. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
[[Page 13329]]
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General
information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing
its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this
investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised
that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the
Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on April 11, 2012, based on a complaint filed by complainants LSI
Corporation of Milpitas, California, and Agere Systems Inc. of
Allentown, Pennsylvania (collectively, ``LSI''). 77 FR 22803 (Apr. 11,
2012). The complaint, as amended, alleged violations of section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), in the importation
into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of certain audiovisual components
and products containing the same by reason of infringement of certain
claims of the '087, '958, '867, and '663 patents. The Commission's
notice of investigation named several respondents, including Realtek
Semiconductor Corporation of Hsinchu, Taiwan (``Realtek''); Funai
Corporation, Inc. of Rutherford, New Jersey; Funai Electric Co., Ltd.
of Osaka, Japan; P&F USA, Inc. of Alpharetta, Georgia; and Funai
Service Corporation of Groveport, Ohio (collectively, ``Funai''). Other
respondents and certain patent claims were terminated from the
investigation previously. No Commission investigative attorney is
participating in the investigation.
The ALJ issued his final initial determination (``ID'') with
respect to the remaining respondents and claims on July 18, 2013. The
ALJ found that a violation of section 337 had been proven with respect
to claims 1, 5, 7-11, and 16 of the '087 patent. The ALJ found no
violation of section 337 had been proven with respect to any asserted
claims of the '958, '867, and '663 patents. On July 31, 2013, the ALJ
issued a recommended determination (``RD'') on remedy and bonding.
On October 17, 2013, the Commission determined to review the final
ID in its entirety and requested additional briefing from the parties
on certain issues. The Commission also solicited briefing from the
parties and from the public on the issues of remedy, the public
interest, and bonding. On November 1, 2013, the parties filed briefs
addressing the Commission's questions and the issues of remedy, the
public interest, and bonding. Also on November 1, 2013, non-parties
Barnes & Noble, Inc.; InterDigital, Inc.; Intel Corporation; and Cisco
Systems, Inc. filed comments on the public interest. On November 12,
2013, the parties filed reply briefs in connection with the
Commission's notice.
On January 17, 2014, complainants and respondent Funai jointly
filed a motion to partially terminate the investigation as to all
claims relating to the '087 and the '663 patents based on a settlement
agreement. Respondent Realtek, which was not accused of violating
section 337 in regard to the '087 and the '663 patents, did not file a
response.
On February 6, 2014, complainants filed a motion to partially
terminate the investigation as to the '867 patent and to vacate the
ALJ's determination as to same due to the imminent expiration of that
patent on February 23, 2014. Respondents opposed vacatur on February
12, 2014.
Having examined the record of this investigation, the Commission
has determined to grant the joint motion to partially terminate the
investigation as to the '087 and the '663 patents based on a settlement
agreement. We find no indication that termination of the investigation
with respect to these patents based on settlement will adversely impact
the public interest.
With respect to the '867 patent, because the Commission grants
prospective relief only, when the '867 patent expired on February 23,
2014, the investigation concerning the '867 patent became moot.
Therefore, the Commission has determined to take no position on the
final ID's findings pertaining to the '867 patent. See Beloit Corp. v.
Valmet Oy, 742 F.2d 1421, 1423 (Fed. Cir. 1984).
With respect to the remaining asserted patent--the '958 patent--the
Commission has determined that no violation of section 337 has been
proven based on the record of this investigation. Specifically, the
Commission affirms the ID's finding that the accused articles were not
proven to infringe the asserted claims of the '958 patent. In addition,
the Commission reverses the ALJ's determination that the asserted '958
claims were not proven invalid. The Commission has also determined to
take no position on the ALJ's determination with respect to the
Respondents' RAND and equitable defenses. See Beloit Corp., 742 F.2d at
1423.
Furthermore, the Commission has determined that complainants have
not proven the existence of a domestic industry with respect to the
'958 patent. The Commission affirms the ALJ's finding that the Nokia
domestic industry articles were not shown to practice the claims of the
'958 patent and, therefore, complainants did not prove a domestic
industry under 19 U.S.C. 1337(a)(3)(A)-(B). Because complainants have
not demonstrated the existence of an article protected by the '958
patent, the Commission has also determined to reverse the ALJ's finding
that a domestic industry exists pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337(a)(3)(C)
through complainants' licensing activities. See Certain Computers and
Computer Peripheral Devices, and Components Thereof, and Products
Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-841, Comm'n Op. at 32 (Jan. 9, 2014).
A Commission opinion will be forthcoming.
The Commission has terminated this investigation. The authority for
the Commission's determination is contained in section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR Part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: March 4, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014-05072 Filed 3-7-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P