Proposed Policy: “Other Relevant Criteria” for Consideration When Evaluating the Economic Soundness of Applications Under the Title XI Maritime Guaranteed Loan Program, 10075-10077 [2014-03729]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 36 / Monday, February 24, 2014 / Proposed Rules
attachment (if they do not exceed the
size stated in the specifications), or
submitted on compact discs or other
electronic storage media.
(2) Alternative filing methods. (i) The
VETS–4212 Report may also be filed in
paper format. Contractors and
subcontractors may download a paper
version of the VETS–4212 Report from
the VETS Web site or send a written
request for the paper version of the
VETS–4212 Report to: Office of the
Assistant Secretary for Veterans’
Employment and Training, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW., Room S–1325,
Washington, DC 20210, Attn: VETS–
4212 Report Form Request.
(ii) VETS–4212 Reports in paper
format or electronic data files on
compact discs or other electronic
storage media may be delivered by U.S.
mail or courier delivery service to the
addresses set forth in the instructions
for completing the report. Paper copies
of the VETS–4212 Reports and
electronic data files (if they do not
exceed the size stated in the
specifications) also may be sent as email
attachments to the address indicated in
the instructions.
§ 61–300.20 How will DOL determine
whether a contractor or subcontractor is
complying with the requirements of this
part?
During the course of a compliance
evaluation, OFCCP may determine
whether a contractor or subcontractor
has submitted its VETS–4212 Report(s)
as required by this part.
§ 61–300.99 What is the OMB control
number for this part?
Pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., and its
implementing regulations at 5 CFR part
1320, the Office of Management and
Budget has assigned Control No. 1293–
0005 to the information collection
requirements of this part.
[FR Doc. 2014–03503 Filed 2–21–14; 8:45 am]
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 4510–79–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
46 CFR Part 298
[Docket Number MARAD–2014–0011]
Proposed Policy: ‘‘Other Relevant
Criteria’’ for Consideration When
Evaluating the Economic Soundness
of Applications Under the Title XI
Maritime Guaranteed Loan Program
Maritime Administration,
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Proposed policy.
AGENCY:
This document provides
interested parties with the opportunity
to comment on the proposed policy
regarding the factors the Maritime
Administration (‘‘MARAD’’) will
consider in its review of applications for
the Title XI Maritime Guaranteed Loan
Program (‘‘Title XI’’). MARAD’s
proposed policy is intended to further
promote the modernization of the U.S.
Merchant Marine and U.S. shipyards
through the construction or
reconstruction (to include repowering)
of vessels.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before March 26, 2014. MARAD will
consider comments filed after this date
to the maximum extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: Comments identified by
Department of Transportation (‘‘DOT’’)
Docket Number MARAD–2014–0011
may be submitted by any of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Search MARAD–
2014–0011 and follow the instructions
for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building,
Room W12–140, Washington, DC 20590.
If you would like to know that your
comments reached the facility, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Docket
Management Facility, U.S. Department
of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., West Building, Room W12–
140, Washington, DC 20590. The Docket
Management Facility is open 9:00 a.m.
to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except on Federal holidays.
SUMMARY:
Note: If you fax, mail or hand deliver your
input we recommend that you include your
name and a mailing address, an email
address, or a telephone number in the body
of your document so that we can contact you
if we have questions regarding your
submission. If you submit your inputs by
mail or hand delivery, submit them in an
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:44 Feb 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
10075
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11
inches, suitable for copying and electronic
filing.
Special Instructions: All submissions
received must include the agency name
and docket number. All comments
received will be posted without change
to the docket at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided. For detailed instructions on
submitting comments and additional
information on the process, see the
section entitled Public Participation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Owen Doherty, Acting Administrator for
Business and Finance Development,
Maritime Administration, Telephone:
202–366–1883, Email: owen.doherty@
dot.gov. If you have questions on
viewing the Docket, call Barbara
Hairston, Acting Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone: 202–366–
9826. Additional background
information may be found at
www.MARAD.dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
primary purpose of Title XI is to
promote the growth and modernization
of the U.S. Merchant Marine and U.S.
shipyards. Title XI promotes such
growth and modernization by providing
loan guarantees to sustain vessel
construction and repair capacity, create
jobs, support development and
utilization of emerging technologies, as
well as encouraging private investment
in the maritime industry. The legislative
history of Title XI reflects the evolution
of the program over its 78 year history
to respond to these contemporary issues
and national priorities.1 Additions over
time have included job creation, new
vessel safety measures, small shipyard
growth, environmental technologies,
increased efficiency in the maritime
industry through modernization and
national defense.
Under 46 U.S.C. 53702(a), Title XI is
a discretionary program. Chapter 537 of
Title 46 of the United States Code and
part 298 of title 46 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) detail the
1 For example, the Ship Financing Act of 1972
demonstrated Congress’ focus on new
environmental technologies, among other things, by
making pollution treatment, abatement, or control
vessels eligible for Title XI guarantees, See Public
Law 92–507, section 1, 86 Stat. 909, as amended,
now codified at 46 U.S.C. 53701(14)(K). In the
1990s, Congress amended Title XI to redevelop the
U.S. maritime industrial base and rebuild the
nation’s shipyards. See National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994, Public Law
103–160, section 1352, 107 Stat. 1812. In recent
years, Title XI’s focus on national security has
grown with priorities focused on national defense
tank vessels and naval auxiliary vessels. See
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2004, Public Law 108–36, section 3544, 117 Stat.
1392, as amended, now codified at 46 U.S.C.
53706(c)(1).
E:\FR\FM\24FEP1.SGM
24FEP1
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
10076
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 36 / Monday, February 24, 2014 / Proposed Rules
factors MARAD must consider in
processing Title XI loan guarantee
applications. These authorities require
MARAD to consider economic
soundness, project feasibility and
specifically enumerated priorities for
processing when evaluating whether to
approve or deny a Title XI application.
For the required economic soundness
determination, 46 U.S.C. 53708(a)
provides six mandatory factors to
consider when evaluating economic
soundness.2 The accompanying
regulation 46 CFR 298.14(b) sets forth
‘‘[b]asic feasibility factors’’ but notes
that ‘‘all relevant factors’’ are required to
be considered prior to a determination
of economic soundness.3
Both 46 U.S.C. 53708(a)(5) and 46
CFR 298.14(b)(6) expressly allow
MARAD to consider ‘‘other relevant
criteria’’ in addition to those
enumerated in the statute and regulation
when making findings of economic
soundness, provided it is reasonable in
doing so. Although not an exhaustive
list, examples of ‘‘other relevant
criteria’’ MARAD may consider, as
appropriate, when evaluating economic
soundness include, but are not limited
to, availability of funding, sensitivity
and concentration of the agency loan
guarantee portfolio, utilization of
America’s Marine Highways and
designated corridors, and synergy with
the DOT Strategic Plan; as well as any
factors contained within 46 CFR chapter
2, subpart D with a bearing on the
economic soundness of a Title XI loan
guarantee application. Examples of such
factors from subpart D include, but are
not limited to, guarantees for less than
the normal term for that class of vessel,
degrees of risk involved with different
applications and influence on existing
Title XI guarantees.
In addition to the factors enumerated
above, MARAD also proposes to
consider various environmental
initiatives that are likely to increase
efficiency and lead to future cost
savings as ‘‘other relevant criteria’’ in its
evaluation of Title XI loan guarantee
applications. The consideration of such
initiatives is consistent not only with
previous Congressional priorities, but
also with the programmatic imperative
to remain current with emerging
standards, trends and critical needs.
Some of these initiatives may include
alternative fuel system designs, fuel
cells, hybrid propulsion systems, air
emissions reduction technologies,
ballast water treatment technologies, or
other environmentally-friendly designs.
2 See
3 See
Reference 46 U.S.C. 53708(a)
Reference 46 CFR 298.14(b)
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:44 Feb 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
Today, it is feasible to construct and/
or repower vessels to incorporate
alternative energy technologies and
fuels,4 environmentally-friendly designs
and other technologies that improve the
environmental sustainability of vessel
operations. The demand for
environmentally friendly designs, fuels
and technologies is growing rapidly
throughout the maritime industry
because, among other things, they meet
new air emissions and other discharge
standards, and also present the potential
for greater efficiencies and cost savings.
MARAD seeks to promote, through Title
XI, projects that provide more
environmentally sustainable marine
transportation. Consideration of these
factors as ‘‘other relevant criteria’’
within an application’s economic
soundness determination would
complement the other such criteria that
MARAD already considers in the
evaluation of an application’s economic
soundness, which include but are not
limited to the factors identified above.
MARAD notes, in particular, that many
of the economic benefits of
environmentally friendly designs, fuels
and technologies take the form of public
benefits that cannot be captured by a
vessel’s owner and operator in the form
of freight rates or passenger fees, but
which may be valuable to society
because of improved human health from
air and water quality. Economists and
environmental experts can often
quantify these benefits in monetary
terms or treat them qualitatively.
Achieving these benefits is consistent
with the DOT Strategic Plan (under the
goal of environmental sustainability)
and other Federal, State and local
objectives. As such, MARAD intends to
include as a contributing factor to
Federal decisions to award Title XI loan
guarantees whether approval will help a
vessel meet or exceed environmental
standards. MARAD will consider the
comments received on this proposed
policy in formulating a final notice of
policy.
Public Participation
Your comments must be written and
in English. To ensure that your
comments are correctly filed in the
Docket, please include the docket
number in your comments. MARAD
encourages you to provide concise
comments. However, you may attach
necessary additional documents to your
comments. There is no limit on the
length of the attachments. Please submit
4 MARAD defines alternative energy and fuels as
energy derived from non-traditional sources
(including but not limited to liquefied or
compressed natural gas, bio-fuels, solar and wind).
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
your comments, including the
attachments, following the instructions
provided under the above heading
entitled ADDRESSES.
If you wish to submit any information
under a claim of confidentiality, you
should submit three copies of your
complete submission, including the
information you claim to be confidential
business information, to the Department
of Transportation, Maritime
Administration, Office of Legislation
and Regulations, MAR–225, W24–220,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590. When you send
comments containing information
claimed to be confidential information,
you should include a cover letter setting
forth with specificity the basis for any
such claim.
MARAD will consider all comments
received before the close of business on
the comment closing date indicated
above under DATES. To the extent
practicable, MARAD will also consider
comments received after that date. If a
comment is received too late for
MARAD to consider in developing a
final policy, MARAD will consider that
comment as an informal suggestion for
future guidance.
For access to the docket to read
background documents, or to submit or
read comments received, go to the
Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building,
Room W12–140, Washington, DC 20590.
The Docket Management Facility is
open 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except on Federal
holidays. To review documents, read
comments or to submit comments, the
docket is also available online at
https://www.regulations.gov., keyword
search MARAD–2014–0011.
Please note that even after the
comment period has closed, MARAD
will continue to file relevant
information in the Docket as it becomes
available. Further, some people may
submit late comments. Accordingly,
MARAD recommends that you
periodically check the Docket for new
material.
Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review the DOT Privacy Act system of
records notice for the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) in the
Federal Register published on January
17, 2008, (73 FR 3316) at https://
E:\FR\FM\24FEP1.SGM
24FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 36 / Monday, February 24, 2014 / Proposed Rules
edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8785.pdf.
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 53708
Dated: February 18, 2014.
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
Christine S. Gurland,
Acting Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014–03729 Filed 2–21–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–81–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS–R2–ES–2014–0008;
4500030113]
RIN 1018–BA32
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Special Rule for the
Georgetown Salamander
AGENCY:
Public Comments
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
Proposed rule.
ACTION:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, propose a special rule
under the authority of section 4(d) of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act), for the Georgetown
salamander (Eurycea naufragia), a
species that occurs in Texas. The special
rule contains measures that are
necessary and advisable to provide for
the conservation of the Georgetown
salamander.
DATES: We will accept comments
received or postmarked on or before
April 25, 2014. Comments submitted
electronically using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal (see ADDRESSES,
below) must be received by 11:59 p.m.
Eastern Time on the closing date.
ADDRESSES: Document availability: You
may obtain a copy of the City of
Georgetown Ordinance 2013–59
described in this proposed rule from the
Federal eRulemaking portal, https://
www.regulations.gov, at Docket No.
FWS–R2–ES–2014–0008.
Comment submission: You may
submit comments on the proposed rule
by one of the following methods:
(1) Electronically: Go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. In the Search box,
enter FWS–R2–ES–2014–0008, which is
the docket number for this rulemaking.
You may submit a comment by clicking
on ‘‘Comment Now!’’
(2) By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail
or hand-delivery to: Public Comments
Processing, Attn: FWS–R2–ES–2014–
0008; Division of Policy and Directives
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:44 Feb 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
Management; U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, MS
2042–PDM; Arlington, VA 22203.
We request that you send comments
only by one of the methods described
above. We will post all comments on
https://www.regulations.gov. This
generally means that we will post any
personal information you provide us
(see the Public Comments section below
for more information).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Adam Zerrenner, Field Supervisor, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, Austin
Ecological Services Field Office, 10711
Burnet Rd, Suite 200, Austin, TX 78758;
by telephone 512–490–0057; or by
facsimile 512–490–0974. Persons who
use a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at
800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
We intend that any final action
resulting from this proposal will be as
accurate and as effective as possible.
Therefore, we request comments or
suggestions on this proposed rule. We
particularly seek comments concerning:
(1) Whether the measures outlined in
this proposed 4(d) special rule are
necessary and advisable for the
conservation and management of the
Georgetown salamander;
(2) Additional provisions the Service
may wish to consider for a 4(d) special
rule in order to conserve, recover, and
manage the Georgetown salamander.
We will consider all comments and
information received during our
preparation of a final 4(d) special rule.
Accordingly, the final rule may differ
from this proposal.
You may submit your comments and
materials concerning this proposed rule
by one of the methods listed in
ADDRESSES. We request that you send
comments only by the methods
described in ADDRESSES.
If you submit information via https://
www.regulations.gov, your entire
submission—including any personal
identifying information—will be posted
on the Web site. If your submission is
made via a hardcopy that includes
personal identifying information, you
may request at the top of your document
that we withhold this information from
public review. However, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
We will post all hardcopy submissions
on https://www.regulations.gov.
Comments and materials we receive,
as well as supporting documentation we
used in preparing this proposed rule,
will be available for public inspection
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
10077
on https://www.regulations.gov, or by
appointment, during normal business
hours, at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Austin Ecological Services
Field Office (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT).
Previous Federal Actions
On August 22, 2012, we published a
proposed rule under the authority of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), to list
as endangered and designate critical
habitat for the Georgetown salamander
and three other salamander species (77
FR 50768). Elsewhere in today’s Federal
Register, we published a final
determination to list the Georgetown
salamander and the Salado salamander
as threatened species. Please see the
final listing determination for additional
information concerning previous
Federal actions for the Georgetown
salamander.
Background
The Georgetown salamander is
entirely aquatic and depends on water
from the Edwards Aquifer in sufficient
quantity and quality to meet its lifehistory requirements for survival,
growth, and reproduction. Degradation
of habitat, in the form of reduced water
quality and quantity and disturbance of
spring sites, is the main threat to this
species. For more information on the
Georgetown salamander and its habitat,
please refer to the final listing
determination published elsewhere in
today’s Federal Register, available
online at https://www.regulations.gov (at
Docket Number FWS–R2–ES–2012–
0035) or from the Austin Ecological
Services Field Office (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT).
The Act does not specify particular
prohibitions, or exceptions to those
prohibitions, for threatened species.
Instead, under section 4(d) of the Act,
the Secretary of the Interior has the
discretion to issue such regulations as
[s]he deems necessary and advisable to
provide for the conservation of such
species. The Secretary also has the
discretion to prohibit by regulation with
respect to any threatened species, any
act prohibited under section 9(a)(1) of
the Act. Exercising this discretion, the
Service developed general prohibitions
(50 CFR 17.31) and exceptions to those
prohibitions (50 CFR 17.32) under the
Act that apply to most threatened
species. Alternately, for other
threatened species, the Service may
develop specific prohibitions and
exceptions that are tailored to the
specific conservation needs of the
species. In such cases, some of the
prohibitions and authorizations under
E:\FR\FM\24FEP1.SGM
24FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 36 (Monday, February 24, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 10075-10077]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-03729]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
46 CFR Part 298
[Docket Number MARAD-2014-0011]
Proposed Policy: ``Other Relevant Criteria'' for Consideration
When Evaluating the Economic Soundness of Applications Under the Title
XI Maritime Guaranteed Loan Program
AGENCY: Maritime Administration, Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Proposed policy.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document provides interested parties with the opportunity
to comment on the proposed policy regarding the factors the Maritime
Administration (``MARAD'') will consider in its review of applications
for the Title XI Maritime Guaranteed Loan Program (``Title XI'').
MARAD's proposed policy is intended to further promote the
modernization of the U.S. Merchant Marine and U.S. shipyards through
the construction or reconstruction (to include repowering) of vessels.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 26, 2014. MARAD
will consider comments filed after this date to the maximum extent
practicable.
ADDRESSES: Comments identified by Department of Transportation
(``DOT'') Docket Number MARAD-2014-0011 may be submitted by any of the
following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Search MARAD-2014-0011 and follow the instructions for submitting
comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building, Room W12-
140, Washington, DC 20590. If you would like to know that your comments
reached the facility, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard
or envelope.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
Building, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590. The Docket Management
Facility is open 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
on Federal holidays.
Note: If you fax, mail or hand deliver your input we recommend
that you include your name and a mailing address, an email address,
or a telephone number in the body of your document so that we can
contact you if we have questions regarding your submission. If you
submit your inputs by mail or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing.
Special Instructions: All submissions received must include the
agency name and docket number. All comments received will be posted
without change to the docket at www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information on the process, see the section
entitled Public Participation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Owen Doherty, Acting Administrator for
Business and Finance Development, Maritime Administration, Telephone:
202-366-1883, Email: owen.doherty@dot.gov. If you have questions on
viewing the Docket, call Barbara Hairston, Acting Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone: 202-366-9826. Additional background
information may be found at www.MARAD.dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The primary purpose of Title XI is to
promote the growth and modernization of the U.S. Merchant Marine and
U.S. shipyards. Title XI promotes such growth and modernization by
providing loan guarantees to sustain vessel construction and repair
capacity, create jobs, support development and utilization of emerging
technologies, as well as encouraging private investment in the maritime
industry. The legislative history of Title XI reflects the evolution of
the program over its 78 year history to respond to these contemporary
issues and national priorities.\1\ Additions over time have included
job creation, new vessel safety measures, small shipyard growth,
environmental technologies, increased efficiency in the maritime
industry through modernization and national defense.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For example, the Ship Financing Act of 1972 demonstrated
Congress' focus on new environmental technologies, among other
things, by making pollution treatment, abatement, or control vessels
eligible for Title XI guarantees, See Public Law 92-507, section 1,
86 Stat. 909, as amended, now codified at 46 U.S.C. 53701(14)(K). In
the 1990s, Congress amended Title XI to redevelop the U.S. maritime
industrial base and rebuild the nation's shipyards. See National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994, Public Law 103-160,
section 1352, 107 Stat. 1812. In recent years, Title XI's focus on
national security has grown with priorities focused on national
defense tank vessels and naval auxiliary vessels. See National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004, Public Law 108-36,
section 3544, 117 Stat. 1392, as amended, now codified at 46 U.S.C.
53706(c)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under 46 U.S.C. 53702(a), Title XI is a discretionary program.
Chapter 537 of Title 46 of the United States Code and part 298 of title
46 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) detail the
[[Page 10076]]
factors MARAD must consider in processing Title XI loan guarantee
applications. These authorities require MARAD to consider economic
soundness, project feasibility and specifically enumerated priorities
for processing when evaluating whether to approve or deny a Title XI
application.
For the required economic soundness determination, 46 U.S.C.
53708(a) provides six mandatory factors to consider when evaluating
economic soundness.\2\ The accompanying regulation 46 CFR 298.14(b)
sets forth ``[b]asic feasibility factors'' but notes that ``all
relevant factors'' are required to be considered prior to a
determination of economic soundness.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Reference 46 U.S.C. 53708(a)
\3\ See Reference 46 CFR 298.14(b)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Both 46 U.S.C. 53708(a)(5) and 46 CFR 298.14(b)(6) expressly allow
MARAD to consider ``other relevant criteria'' in addition to those
enumerated in the statute and regulation when making findings of
economic soundness, provided it is reasonable in doing so. Although not
an exhaustive list, examples of ``other relevant criteria'' MARAD may
consider, as appropriate, when evaluating economic soundness include,
but are not limited to, availability of funding, sensitivity and
concentration of the agency loan guarantee portfolio, utilization of
America's Marine Highways and designated corridors, and synergy with
the DOT Strategic Plan; as well as any factors contained within 46 CFR
chapter 2, subpart D with a bearing on the economic soundness of a
Title XI loan guarantee application. Examples of such factors from
subpart D include, but are not limited to, guarantees for less than the
normal term for that class of vessel, degrees of risk involved with
different applications and influence on existing Title XI guarantees.
In addition to the factors enumerated above, MARAD also proposes to
consider various environmental initiatives that are likely to increase
efficiency and lead to future cost savings as ``other relevant
criteria'' in its evaluation of Title XI loan guarantee applications.
The consideration of such initiatives is consistent not only with
previous Congressional priorities, but also with the programmatic
imperative to remain current with emerging standards, trends and
critical needs. Some of these initiatives may include alternative fuel
system designs, fuel cells, hybrid propulsion systems, air emissions
reduction technologies, ballast water treatment technologies, or other
environmentally-friendly designs.
Today, it is feasible to construct and/or repower vessels to
incorporate alternative energy technologies and fuels,\4\
environmentally-friendly designs and other technologies that improve
the environmental sustainability of vessel operations. The demand for
environmentally friendly designs, fuels and technologies is growing
rapidly throughout the maritime industry because, among other things,
they meet new air emissions and other discharge standards, and also
present the potential for greater efficiencies and cost savings. MARAD
seeks to promote, through Title XI, projects that provide more
environmentally sustainable marine transportation. Consideration of
these factors as ``other relevant criteria'' within an application's
economic soundness determination would complement the other such
criteria that MARAD already considers in the evaluation of an
application's economic soundness, which include but are not limited to
the factors identified above. MARAD notes, in particular, that many of
the economic benefits of environmentally friendly designs, fuels and
technologies take the form of public benefits that cannot be captured
by a vessel's owner and operator in the form of freight rates or
passenger fees, but which may be valuable to society because of
improved human health from air and water quality. Economists and
environmental experts can often quantify these benefits in monetary
terms or treat them qualitatively. Achieving these benefits is
consistent with the DOT Strategic Plan (under the goal of environmental
sustainability) and other Federal, State and local objectives. As such,
MARAD intends to include as a contributing factor to Federal decisions
to award Title XI loan guarantees whether approval will help a vessel
meet or exceed environmental standards. MARAD will consider the
comments received on this proposed policy in formulating a final notice
of policy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ MARAD defines alternative energy and fuels as energy derived
from non-traditional sources (including but not limited to liquefied
or compressed natural gas, bio-fuels, solar and wind).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Participation
Your comments must be written and in English. To ensure that your
comments are correctly filed in the Docket, please include the docket
number in your comments. MARAD encourages you to provide concise
comments. However, you may attach necessary additional documents to
your comments. There is no limit on the length of the attachments.
Please submit your comments, including the attachments, following the
instructions provided under the above heading entitled ADDRESSES.
If you wish to submit any information under a claim of
confidentiality, you should submit three copies of your complete
submission, including the information you claim to be confidential
business information, to the Department of Transportation, Maritime
Administration, Office of Legislation and Regulations, MAR-225, W24-
220, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. When you send
comments containing information claimed to be confidential information,
you should include a cover letter setting forth with specificity the
basis for any such claim.
MARAD will consider all comments received before the close of
business on the comment closing date indicated above under DATES. To
the extent practicable, MARAD will also consider comments received
after that date. If a comment is received too late for MARAD to
consider in developing a final policy, MARAD will consider that comment
as an informal suggestion for future guidance.
For access to the docket to read background documents, or to submit
or read comments received, go to the Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
Building, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590. The Docket Management
Facility is open 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
on Federal holidays. To review documents, read comments or to submit
comments, the docket is also available online at https://www.regulations.gov., keyword search MARAD-2014-0011.
Please note that even after the comment period has closed, MARAD
will continue to file relevant information in the Docket as it becomes
available. Further, some people may submit late comments. Accordingly,
MARAD recommends that you periodically check the Docket for new
material.
Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review the DOT
Privacy Act system of records notice for the Federal Docket Management
System (FDMS) in the Federal Register published on January 17, 2008,
(73 FR 3316) at https://
[[Page 10077]]
edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-785.pdf.
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 53708
Dated: February 18, 2014.
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
Christine S. Gurland,
Acting Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014-03729 Filed 2-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-81-P