Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 6658-6659 [2014-02245]
Download as PDF
6658
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 23 / Tuesday, February 4, 2014 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Comment submissions were received
on the proposed revision (ADAMS
Accession No. ML12142A237).
The NRC staff made several changes
to the proposed revision after
consideration of the comments. The
scope of use of the new introduction has
been expanded to include any type of
application under Part 52 of Title 10 of
the Code of Federal Regulations (10
CFR): early site permits (ESPs), design
certifications (DCs), standard design
approvals (SDAs), combined licenses
(COLs), or manufacturing licenses
(MLs). Additionally, throughout the
document, the use of the term ‘‘iPWR’’
(integral pressurized water reactor) has
been replaced by ‘‘SMR’’ (small modular
reactor) for consistency. Finally, the
historical summary paragraph related to
SECY–11–0156 was removed as it did
not directly apply to the guidance in the
new part of the introduction.
A summary of the public comments
and the NRC staff’s disposition of the
comments are available in a separate
document, Response to Public
Comments on Draft SRP,
‘‘Introduction—Part 2’’ (ADAMS
Accession No. ML13207A309). The
ADAMS Accession Number for the
Nuclear Energy Institute letter and
comments is ML13091A017.
II. Backfitting and Issue Finality
Issuance of this final SRP section does
not constitute backfitting as defined in
10 CFR 50.109 (the Backfit Rule) and is
not otherwise inconsistent with the
issue finality provisions in 10 CFR part
52. The NRC staff’s position is based
upon the following considerations:
1. The SRP positions do not constitute
backfitting, inasmuch as the SRP is
internal guidance directed at the NRC
staff with respect to their regulatory
responsibilities.
The SRP provides guidance to the
staff on how to review an application for
NRC regulatory approval in the form of
licensing. Changes in internal staff
guidance are not matters for which
either nuclear power plant applicants or
licensees are protected under either the
Backfit Rule or the issue finality
provisions of 10 CFR part 52.
2. Backfitting and issue finality—with
certain exceptions discussed below—do
not protect current or future applicants.
Applicants and potential applicants
are not, with certain exceptions,
protected by either the Backfit Rule or
any issue finality provisions under 10
CFR part 52. This is because neither the
Backfit Rule nor the issue finality
provisions were intended to apply to
every NRC action which substantially
changes the expectations of current and
future applicants.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:14 Feb 03, 2014
Jkt 232001
The exceptions to the general
principle are applicable whenever an
applicant references a 10 CFR part 52
license (e.g., an early site permit) and/
or NRC regulatory approval (e.g., a
design certification rule) with specified
issue finality provisions. The staff does
not currently intend to impose the
positions represented in this SRP
section in a manner that is inconsistent
with any issue finality provisions of 10
CFR part 52. If in the future the NRC
staff does indeed intend to impose
positions inconsistent with these issue
finality provisions, the NRC staff must
address the regulatory criteria for
avoiding issue finality.
3. The NRC staff has no intention to
impose the SRP positions on existing
nuclear power plant licenses or
regulatory approvals either now or in
the future (absent a voluntary request
for change from the licensee, holder of
a regulatory approval, or a design
certification applicant).
The staff does not intend to impose or
apply the positions described in the SRP
section to existing (already issued)
licenses (e.g., operating licenses and
combined licenses) and regulatory
approvals—in this case, design
certifications. Hence, the issuance of
this SRP guidance even if considered
guidance which is within the purview
of the issue finality provisions in 10
CFR part 52—need not be evaluated as
if it were a backfit or as being
inconsistent with issue finality
provisions. If, in the future, the staff
seeks to impose a position in the SRP on
holders of already issued licenses in a
manner which does not provide issue
finality as described in the applicable
issue finality provision, then the staff
must make the showing as set forth in
the Backfit Rule, or address the criteria
for avoiding issue finality as described
applicable issue finality provision, as
applicable.
III. Congressional Review Act
In accordance with the Congressional
Review Act, the NRC has determined
that this action is not a major rule and
has verified this determination with the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs of the Office of Management and
Budget.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 28th day
of January 2014.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Joseph Colaccino,
Chief, Policy Branch, Division of Advanced
Reactors and Rulemaking, Office of New
Reactors.
[FR Doc. 2014–02317 Filed 2–3–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00128
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor
Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549–0213.
Extension:
Rule 203A–2(e), OMB Control No. 3235–
0559, SEC File No. 270–501.
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (‘‘PRA’’), the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the collections of information
summarized below. The Commission
plans to submit this existing collection
of information to the Office of
Management and Budget for extension
and approval.
Rule 203A–2(e),1 which is entitled
‘‘Internet Investment Advisers,’’
exempts from the prohibition on
Commission registration an Internet
investment adviser who provides
investment advice to all of its clients
exclusively through computer softwarebased models or applications, termed
under the rule as ‘‘interactive Web
sites.’’ 2 These advisers generally would
not meet the statutory thresholds
currently set out in section 203A of the
Advisers Act 3—they do not manage $25
million or more in assets and do not
advise registered investment companies,
or they manage between $25 million
and $100 million in assets, do not
advise registered investment companies
or business development companies,
and are required to be registered as
investment advisers with the states in
which they maintain their principal
offices and places of business and are
subject to examination as an adviser by
such states.4 Eligibility under rule
203A–2(e) is conditioned on an adviser
maintaining in an easily accessible
place, for a period of not less than five
years from the filing of Form ADV,5 a
1 17
CFR 275.203A–2(e).
in rule 203A–2(e) is a limited
exception to the interactive Web site requirement
which allows these advisers to provide investment
advice to fewer than 15 clients through other means
on an annual basis. 17 CFR 275.203A–2(e)(1)(i). The
rule also precludes advisers in a control
relationship with an SEC-registered Internet adviser
from registering with the Commission under the
common control exemption provided by rule 203A–
2(b) (17 CFR 275.203A–2(b)). 17 CFR 275.203A–
2(e)(1)(iii).
3 15 U.S.C. 80b–3a(a).
4 Id.
5 The five-year record retention period is a similar
recordkeeping retention period as imposed on all
2 Included
E:\FR\FM\04FEN1.SGM
04FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 23 / Tuesday, February 4, 2014 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
record demonstrating that the adviser’s
advisory business has been conducted
through an interactive Web site in
accordance with the rule.6
This record maintenance requirement
is a ‘‘collection of information’’ for PRA
purposes. The Commission believes that
approximately 74 advisers are registered
with the Commission under rule 203A–
2(e), which involves a recordkeeping
requirement of approximately four
burden hours per year per adviser and
results in an estimated 296 of total
burden hours (4 x 74) for all advisers.
This collection of information is
mandatory, as it is used by Commission
staff in its examination and oversight
program in order to determine
continued Commission registration
eligibility for advisers registered under
this rule. Responses generally are kept
confidential pursuant to section 210(b)
of the Advisers Act.7 Written comments
are invited on: (a) Whether the
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Commission, including
whether the information has practical
utility; (b) The accuracy of the
Commission’s estimate of the burden of
the collection of information; (c) Ways
to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information collected; and
(d) Ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted in
writing within 60 days of this
publication. An agency may not conduct
or sponsor a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. No person shall be
subject to any penalty for failing to
comply with a collection of information
subject to the PRA that does not display
a valid OMB control number.
Please direct your written comments
to Thomas Bayer, Chief Information
Officer, Securities and Exchange
Commission, C/O Remi Pavlik-Simon,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549; or send an email to: PRA_
Mailbox@sec.gov.
Dated: January 29, 2014.
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–02245 Filed 2–3–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
advisers under rule 204–2 of the Advisers Act. See
rule 204–2 (17 CFR 275.204–2).
6 17 CFR 275.203A–2(e)(1)(ii).
7 15 U.S.C. 80b–10(a).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:14 Feb 03, 2014
Jkt 232001
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor
Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549–0213.
Extension:
Rule 203A–2(d), OMB Control No. 3235–
0689, SEC File No. 270–630.
Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments
on the collections of information
summarized below. The Commission
plans to submit this existing collection
of information to the Office of
Management and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) for
extension and approval.
The title of the collection of
information is: ‘‘Exemption for Certain
Multi-State Investment Advisers (Rule
203A–2(d)).’’ Its currently approved
OMB control number is 3235–0689. An
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and
a person is not required to respond to,
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Pursuant to section 203A of the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the
‘‘Act’’) (15 U.S.C. 80b-3a), an investment
adviser that is regulated or required to
be regulated as an investment adviser in
the state in which it maintains its
principal office and place of business is
prohibited from registering with the
Commission unless that adviser has at
least $25 million in assets under
management or advises a Commissionregistered investment company. Section
203A also prohibits from Commission
registration an adviser that: (i) Has
assets under management between $25
million and $100 million; (ii) is required
to be registered as an investment adviser
with the state in which it maintains its
principal office and place of business;
and (iii) if registered, would be subject
to examination as an adviser by that
state (a ‘‘mid-sized adviser’’). A midsized adviser that otherwise would be
prohibited may register with the
Commission if it would be required to
register with 15 or more states.
Similarly, Rule 203A–2(d) under the Act
(17 CFR 275.203a-2(d)) provides that the
prohibition on registration with the
Commission does not apply to an
investment adviser that is required to
register in 15 or more states. An
investment adviser relying on this
exemption also must: (i) Include a
PO 00000
Frm 00129
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
6659
representation on Schedule D of Form
ADV that the investment adviser has
concluded that it must register as an
investment adviser with the required
number of states; (ii) undertake to
withdraw from registration with the
Commission if the adviser indicates on
an annual updating amendment to Form
ADV that it would be required by the
laws of fewer than 15 states to register
as an investment adviser with the state;
and (iii) maintain in an easily accessible
place a record of the states in which the
investment adviser has determined it
would, but for the exemption, be
required to register for a period of not
less than five years from the filing of a
Form ADV relying on the rule.
Respondents to this collection of
information are investment advisers
required to register in 15 or more states
absent the exemption that rely on rule
203A–2(d) to register with the
Commission. The information collected
under rule 203A–2(d) permits the
Commission’s examination staff to
determine an adviser’s eligibility for
registration with the Commission under
this exemptive rule and is also
necessary for the Commission staff to
use in its examination and oversight
program. This collection of information
is codified at 17 CFR 275.203a–2(d) and
is mandatory to qualify for and maintain
Commission registration eligibility
under rule 203A–2(d). Responses to the
recordkeeping requirements under rule
203A–2(d) in the context of the
Commission’s examination and
oversight program are generally kept
confidential.
The estimated number of investment
advisers subject to the collection of
information requirements under the rule
is 152. These advisers will incur an
average one-time initial burden of
approximately 8 hours, and an average
ongoing burden of approximately 8
hours per year, to keep records
sufficient to demonstrate that they meet
the 15-state threshold. These estimates
are based on an estimate that each year
an investment adviser will spend
approximately 0.5 hours creating a
record of its determination whether it
must register as an investment adviser
with each of the 15 states required to
rely on the exemption, and
approximately 0.5 hours to maintain
these records. Accordingly, we estimate
that rule 203A–2(d) results in an annual
aggregate burden of collection for SECregistered investment advisers of a total
of 1,216 hours. Estimates of average
burden hours are made solely for the
purposes of the Paperwork Reduction
Act, and are not derived from a
comprehensive or even a representative
E:\FR\FM\04FEN1.SGM
04FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 23 (Tuesday, February 4, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6658-6659]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-02245]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC
20549-0213.
Extension:
Rule 203A-2(e), OMB Control No. 3235-0559, SEC File No. 270-501.
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (``PRA''), the Securities and
Exchange Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the
collections of information summarized below. The Commission plans to
submit this existing collection of information to the Office of
Management and Budget for extension and approval.
Rule 203A-2(e),\1\ which is entitled ``Internet Investment
Advisers,'' exempts from the prohibition on Commission registration an
Internet investment adviser who provides investment advice to all of
its clients exclusively through computer software-based models or
applications, termed under the rule as ``interactive Web sites.'' \2\
These advisers generally would not meet the statutory thresholds
currently set out in section 203A of the Advisers Act \3\--they do not
manage $25 million or more in assets and do not advise registered
investment companies, or they manage between $25 million and $100
million in assets, do not advise registered investment companies or
business development companies, and are required to be registered as
investment advisers with the states in which they maintain their
principal offices and places of business and are subject to examination
as an adviser by such states.\4\ Eligibility under rule 203A-2(e) is
conditioned on an adviser maintaining in an easily accessible place,
for a period of not less than five years from the filing of Form
ADV,\5\ a
[[Page 6659]]
record demonstrating that the adviser's advisory business has been
conducted through an interactive Web site in accordance with the
rule.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 17 CFR 275.203A-2(e).
\2\ Included in rule 203A-2(e) is a limited exception to the
interactive Web site requirement which allows these advisers to
provide investment advice to fewer than 15 clients through other
means on an annual basis. 17 CFR 275.203A-2(e)(1)(i). The rule also
precludes advisers in a control relationship with an SEC-registered
Internet adviser from registering with the Commission under the
common control exemption provided by rule 203A-2(b) (17 CFR
275.203A-2(b)). 17 CFR 275.203A-2(e)(1)(iii).
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 80b-3a(a).
\4\ Id.
\5\ The five-year record retention period is a similar
recordkeeping retention period as imposed on all advisers under rule
204-2 of the Advisers Act. See rule 204-2 (17 CFR 275.204-2).
\6\ 17 CFR 275.203A-2(e)(1)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This record maintenance requirement is a ``collection of
information'' for PRA purposes. The Commission believes that
approximately 74 advisers are registered with the Commission under rule
203A-2(e), which involves a recordkeeping requirement of approximately
four burden hours per year per adviser and results in an estimated 296
of total burden hours (4 x 74) for all advisers.
This collection of information is mandatory, as it is used by
Commission staff in its examination and oversight program in order to
determine continued Commission registration eligibility for advisers
registered under this rule. Responses generally are kept confidential
pursuant to section 210(b) of the Advisers Act.\7\ Written comments are
invited on: (a) Whether the collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including
whether the information has practical utility; (b) The accuracy of the
Commission's estimate of the burden of the collection of information;
(c) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) Ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology. Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions
submitted in writing within 60 days of this publication. An agency may
not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number. No person shall be subject to any
penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject
to the PRA that does not display a valid OMB control number.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 80b-10(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please direct your written comments to Thomas Bayer, Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549; or send an email
to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.
Dated: January 29, 2014.
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-02245 Filed 2-3-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P