Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 4501-4504 [2014-01538]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 18 / Tuesday, January 28, 2014 / Notices on-site leased workers from AccountTemps, Aerotek, Phillips Staffing, Hagemeyer and ATS, Inc., Summerville, South Carolina. The workers are engaged in activities related to remanufactured automotive and hydraulic parts. The notice was published in the Federal Register on November 21, 2013 (78 FR 69882). At the request of the State, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. New information from the company shows that workers leased from Robert Half/ AccounTemps were employed on-site at the Summerville, South Carolina location of Caterpillar Reman Powertrain Services, Inc., a subsidiary of Caterpillar, Inc. The Department has determined that these workers were sufficiently under the control of Caterpillar Reman Powertrain Services, Inc., a subsidiary of Caterpillar, Inc. to be considered leased workers. The intent of the Department’s certification is to include all workers of the subject firm who were adversely affected by a shift in the production of remanufactured automotive and hydraulic parts to a foreign country. Based on these findings, the Department is amending this certification to include workers leased from Robert Half/AccounTemps working on-site at the Summerville, South Carolina location of the subject firm. The amended notice applicable to TA–W–83,094 is hereby issued as follows: ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES All workers from Caterpillar Reman Powertrain Services, Inc., a subsidiary of Caterpillar, Inc., including on-site leased workers from Robert Half/AccounTemps, Aerotek, Phillips Staffing, Hagemeyer and ATS, Inc., Summerville, South Carolina, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after September 17, 2012, through October 29, 2015, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on date of certification through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of January 2014. Michael W. Jaffe, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2014–01543 Filed 1–27–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:45 Jan 27, 2014 Jkt 232001 4501 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. Employment and Training Administration Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of January 2014. Michel W. Jaffe, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [TA–W–82,750] Boise White Paper, LLC; a Subsidiary of Boise, Inc.; Including Workers Whose Unemployment Insurance (UI) Wages are Reported Through MDW Railroad, Including On-Site Leased Workers From Bartlett & Associates International Falls, Minnesota; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on July 3, 2013, applicable to workers of Boise White Paper, LLC, a subsidiary of Boise, Inc., including onsite leased workers from Bartlett & Associates, International Falls, Minnesota. The workers are engaged in activities related to the production of paper (uncoated and coated free sheet). The notice was published in the Federal Register on August 8, 2013 (78 FR 48470). At the request of Minnesota State, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. New information from the company shows that some workers separated from employment at the International Falls, Minnesota location of Boise White Paper, LLC, a subsidiary of Boise, Inc. had their wages reported through a separate unemployment insurance (UI) tax account under the name MDW Railroad. Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to include workers of the subject firm whose unemployment insurance (UI) wages are reported through MDW Railroad. The intent of the Department’s certification is to include all workers of the subject firm who were adversely affected by increased imports of paper. The amended notice applicable to TA–W–82,750 is hereby issued as follows: All workers of Boise White Paper, LLC, a subsidiary of Boise, Inc., including workers whose unemployment insurance (UI) wages are reported through MDW Railroad, including on-site leased workers from Bartlett & Associates, International Falls, Minnesota, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after May 17, 2012, through July 3, 2015, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on date of certification through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 [FR Doc. 2014–01542 Filed 1–27–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers by (TA–W) number issued during the period of January 6, 2014 through January 14, 2014. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased absolutely; and (3) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have increased; (B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are directly incorporated, have increased; (C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more component parts produced outside the United States that are like or directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more component parts produced by such firm have increased; (D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have increased; and E:\FR\FM\28JAN1.SGM 28JAN1 4502 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 18 / Tuesday, January 28, 2014 / Notices (4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the sales or production of such firm; or II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) There has been a shift by the workers’ firm to a foreign country in the production of articles or supply of services like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; (B) There has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the workers’ firm of articles/services that are like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; and (3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such agency; and (3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must be met. (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers’ firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or production is related to the article or service that was the basis for such certification; and (3) Either— (A) The workers’ firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers’ firm; or (B) A loss of business by the workers’ firm with the firm described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers’ separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met. (1) The workers’ firm is publicly identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in— (A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat thereof under section 202(b)(1); (B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat thereof under section 421(b)(1); or (C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); (2) The petition is filed during the 1year period beginning on the date on which— (A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or (B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and (3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the workers’ firm within— (A) The 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or (B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding the 1-year period described in paragraph (2). Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Subject firm Location 83,232 .......... 83,295 .......... Glen Oak Lumber & Milling, Inc. ................................................................ Lincoln Paper and Tissue LLC ................................................................... Montello, WI ......................... Lincoln, ME .......................... The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Subject firm Location 83,128 .......... 83,157 .......... 83,157A ....... 83,216 .......... 83,235 .......... 83,252 .......... 83,252A ....... Catalyst Paper (Snowflake) Inc., Catalyst Paper Holdings Inc .................. Eaton, U.S., Inc., Bussman Division, McCain Employment, etc ................ Leased Workers from Adecco, Working on-Site at Eaton ......................... NTT Data, Inc., Information Technology Consulting Group ....................... QBE Americas, Inc., QBE Holdings, Inc., Travel Department ................... Congoleum Corporation ............................................................................. Congoleum Corporation ............................................................................. Snowflake, AZ ...................... Goldsboro, NC ..................... Goldsboro, NC ..................... North Syracuse, NY ............. Sun Prairie, WI ..................... Trenton, NJ .......................... Mercerville, NJ ..................... 14:45 Jan 27, 2014 Jkt 232001 November 20, 2012. December 16, 2012. services) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. VerDate Mar<15>2010 Impact date PO 00000 Frm 00063 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28JAN1.SGM 28JAN1 Impact date October 1, 2012. December 10, 2013. October 20, 2012. November 12, 2012. November 21, 2012. November 30, 2012. November 30, 2012. 4503 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 18 / Tuesday, January 28, 2014 / Notices TA–W No. Subject firm Location 83,254 .......... Brady Worldwide, Inc. d/b/a Electromark, Inc., Brady Corporation, Randstad and Adecco. Apex Tool Group—Dallas Operations, Bain Capital, Employee Solutions and Aerotek. Commercial Operations, Personal Printing Systems Division, HewlettPackard Company, etc. Magnetics Division of Spang & Company, Magnetics Division, Spang & Company. Magnetics Division of Spang & Company, Magnetics Division, Spang & Company. ShoeDazzle, JustFabulous, ADP Totalsource, Act 1 Personnel Services and Techead. Weyerhaeuser NR Company, Propagation of High Value Trees (PHVT) Unit, Volt. Econolite Control Products, Inc., Econolite Group, Inc. ............................. Navex Global, Inc., Formerly ‘‘ELT, Inc.’’ ................................................... Distinctive Industries, Roadwide, Inc., Employment Service Agency ........ The Fabri-Form Company, Engineered Components Division,The Penda Form Company, Manpower, etc. Benteler Automotive, Manpower ................................................................ Merastar, Kemper Preferred Division ......................................................... Wolcott, NY .......................... November 18, 2012. Garland, TX .......................... December 3, 2012. Omaha, NE .......................... December 2, 2012. East Butler, PA ..................... October 13, 2013. Pittsburgh, PA ...................... October 13, 2013. Los Angeles, CA .................. December 5, 2012. Federal Way, WA ................. December 6, 2012. Anaheim, CA ........................ San Francisco, CA ............... Santa Fe Springs, CA .......... Pekin, IN ............................... December December December December Grand Rapids, MI ................. Dewitt, NY ............................ December 11, 2012. December 13, 2012. 83,258 .......... 83,261 .......... 83,268 .......... 83,268A ....... 83,271 .......... 83,281 .......... 83,282 83,284 83,289 83,291 .......... .......... .......... .......... 83,294 .......... 83,305 .......... The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers Subject firm Location 83,266 .......... WW Metal Fab, WW Group, Inc., Aerotek ................................................. Milwaukee, OR ..................... 222(c) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are certified eligible to Subject firm Location 83,190 .......... Rockwell Collins, Inc., Service Solutions Organization, Dallas Service Center, Allegis Group. Irving, TX .............................. In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified. The investigation revealed that the criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or TA–W No. Subject firm 83,223 .......... 83,226 .......... CDS Publications—San Diego, Consolidated Graphics ............................ American Express Travel Related Services Company Inc., World Service-Service Networking Engineering, American Express, etc. IMPCO Technologies, Inc., Fuel Systems Solutions, Inc .......................... 83,283 .......... Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker Adjustment Assistance ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register and 83,181 .......... 83,307 .......... 83,307A ....... Kloeckner Metals ........................................................................................ Veeco Instrument Inc. ................................................................................ Veeco Instrument Inc. (MOCVD Systems) ................................................. VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:45 Jan 27, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00064 Sfmt 4703 October 31, 2012. Impact date Sterling Heights, MI. The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Location Fmt 4703 Impact date Vista, CA. Salt Lake City, UT. on the Department’s Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act (19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these petitions. Subject firm November 26, 2012. (b)(1), or (c)(1)(employment decline or threat of separation) of section 222 has not been met. Location TA–W No. Impact date apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance 10, 2012. 4, 2012. 11, 2012. 13, 2012. are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. TA–W No. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section Impact date Bensalem, PA. Plainview, NY. Somerset, NJ. E:\FR\FM\28JAN1.SGM 28JAN1 Impact date 4504 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 18 / Tuesday, January 28, 2014 / Notices The following determinations terminating investigations were issued in cases where these petitions were not filed in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 90.11. Every petition filed by workers must be signed by at least three individuals of the petitioning worker group. Petitioners separated more than one year prior to the date of the petition cannot be covered under a certification of a petition under Section 223(b), and TA–W No. Subject firm 83,352 .......... Abt Associates, Inc. .................................................................................... therefore, may not be part of a petitioning worker group. For one or more of these reasons, these petitions were deemed invalid. The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioning groups of Location Bethesda, MD. workers are covered by active certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases would serve TA–W No. OSRAM Sylvania, Manpower and Superior Tech Services ....................... no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be covered by more than one certification at a time. Subject firm 83,262 .......... I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of January 6, 2014 through January 14, 2014. These determinations are available on the Department’s Web site tradeact/taa/taa_ search_form.cfm under the searchable listing of determinations or by calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance toll free at 888–365–6822. Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of January 2014. Michael W. Jaffe, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 2014–01538 Filed 1–27–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P Impact date Location Impact date York, PA. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employment and Training Administration Investigations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under Section 221 (a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and are identified in the appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to section 221(a) of the Act. The purpose of each of the investigations is to determine whether the workers are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under title II, chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations will further relate, as appropriate, to the determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved. The petitioners or any other persons showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigations may request a public hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than February 7, 2014. Interested persons are invited to submit written comments regarding the subject matter of the investigations to the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than February 7, 2014. The petitions filed in this case are available for inspection at the Office of the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N–5428, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210. Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of January 2014. Michael W. Jaffe, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. APPENDIX [10 TAA petitions instituted between 1/6/14 and 1/10/14] ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES TA–W 85001 85002 85003 85004 85005 85006 85007 85008 85009 85010 ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... VerDate Mar<15>2010 Date of institution Subject firm (petitioners) Location Boehringer Ingelheim (Workers) ............................................... Lennox Hearth Products (Company) ........................................ Warner Home Video (State/One-Stop) ..................................... Resorts World Casino (Workers) .............................................. Lynch Technologies, LLC (Company) ...................................... Intel Corporation (Workers) ....................................................... D R Johnson Lumber Co (State/One-Stop) .............................. Umpqua Lumber Company (State/One-Stop) .......................... Standard And Poors (McGraw Hill Finance) (Workers) ........... Smithfield (State/One-Stop) ...................................................... Petersburg, VA ........................ Union City, TN ......................... Burbank, CA ............................ Queens, NY ............................. Bainbridge, GA ........................ Rio Rancho, NM ...................... Riddle, OR ............................... Dillard, OR ............................... New York, NY ......................... Landover, MD .......................... 14:45 Jan 27, 2014 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28JAN1.SGM 28JAN1 01/06/14 01/06/14 01/06/14 01/07/14 01/08/14 01/08/14 01/09/14 01/09/14 01/09/14 01/10/14 Date of petition 01/04/14 01/03/14 01/03/14 01/06/14 12/31/13 01/07/14 01/08/14 01/08/14 01/08/14 01/09/14

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 18 (Tuesday, January 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4501-4504]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-01538]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance

In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment
assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of
January 6, 2014 through January 14, 2014.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased
absolutely; and
(3) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive
with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have
increased;
(B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are
directly incorporated, have increased;
(C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more
component parts produced outside the United States that are like or
directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more
component parts produced by such firm have increased;
(D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have
increased; and

[[Page 4502]]

(4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the
sales or production of such firm; or
II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) There has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign
country in the production of articles or supply of services like or
directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm;
(B) There has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the
workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly
competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and
(3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers'
separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must
be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public
agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to
become totally or partially separated;
(2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services
like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such
agency; and
(3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must
be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) The workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a
firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of
eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or
production is related to the article or service that was the basis for
such certification; and
(3) Either--
(A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least
20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or
(B) A loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described
in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or
threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade
Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply
for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met.
(1) The workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the
International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an
investigation resulting in--
(A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat
thereof under section 202(b)(1);
(B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat
thereof under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat
thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) The petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the
date on which--
(A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the
International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to
the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is
published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or
(B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and
(3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the
workers' firm within--
(A) The 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or
(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding
the 1-year period described in paragraph (2).

Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been
met.

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act
have been met.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
83,128............... Catalyst Paper (Snowflake) Inc., Snowflake, AZ....... October 1, 2012.
Catalyst Paper Holdings Inc.
83,157............... Eaton, U.S., Inc., Bussman Goldsboro, NC....... December 10, 2013.
Division, McCain Employment, etc.
83,157A.............. Leased Workers from Adecco, Working Goldsboro, NC....... October 20, 2012.
on-Site at Eaton.
83,216............... NTT Data, Inc., Information North Syracuse, NY.. November 12, 2012.
Technology Consulting Group.
83,235............... QBE Americas, Inc., QBE Holdings, Sun Prairie, WI..... November 21, 2012.
Inc., Travel Department.
83,252............... Congoleum Corporation.............. Trenton, NJ......... November 30, 2012.
83,252A.............. Congoleum Corporation.............. Mercerville, NJ..... November 30, 2012.

[[Page 4503]]

83,254............... Brady Worldwide, Inc. d/b/a Wolcott, NY......... November 18, 2012.
Electromark, Inc., Brady
Corporation, Randstad and Adecco.
83,258............... Apex Tool Group--Dallas Operations, Garland, TX......... December 3, 2012.
Bain Capital, Employee Solutions
and Aerotek.
83,261............... Commercial Operations, Personal Omaha, NE........... December 2, 2012.
Printing Systems Division, Hewlett-
Packard Company, etc.
83,268............... Magnetics Division of Spang & East Butler, PA..... October 13, 2013.
Company, Magnetics Division, Spang
& Company.
83,268A.............. Magnetics Division of Spang & Pittsburgh, PA...... October 13, 2013.
Company, Magnetics Division, Spang
& Company.
83,271............... ShoeDazzle, JustFabulous, ADP Los Angeles, CA..... December 5, 2012.
Totalsource, Act 1 Personnel
Services and Techead.
83,281............... Weyerhaeuser NR Company, Federal Way, WA..... December 6, 2012.
Propagation of High Value Trees
(PHVT) Unit, Volt.
83,282............... Econolite Control Products, Inc., Anaheim, CA......... December 10, 2012.
Econolite Group, Inc..
83,284............... Navex Global, Inc., Formerly ``ELT, San Francisco, CA... December 4, 2012.
Inc.''.
83,289............... Distinctive Industries, Roadwide, Santa Fe Springs, CA December 11, 2012.
Inc., Employment Service Agency.
83,291............... The Fabri-Form Company, Engineered Pekin, IN........... December 13, 2012.
Components Division,The Penda Form
Company, Manpower, etc.
83,294............... Benteler Automotive, Manpower...... Grand Rapids, MI.... December 11, 2012.
83,305............... Merastar, Kemper Preferred Division Dewitt, NY.......... December 13, 2012.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible
to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.

The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(c) (downstream producer for a firm whose workers are
certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.

Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance

In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met
for the reasons specified.
The investigation revealed that the criterion under paragraph
(a)(1), or (b)(1), or (c)(1)(employment decline or threat of
separation) of section 222 has not been met.

Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker
Adjustment Assistance

After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register
and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act
(19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these
petitions.
The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn.

[[Page 4504]]

The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
in cases where these petitions were not filed in accordance with the
requirements of 29 CFR 90.11. Every petition filed by workers must be
signed by at least three individuals of the petitioning worker group.
Petitioners separated more than one year prior to the date of the
petition cannot be covered under a certification of a petition under
Section 223(b), and therefore, may not be part of a petitioning worker
group. For one or more of these reasons, these petitions were deemed
invalid.

The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioning groups of workers are covered by active
certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases
would serve no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be
covered by more than one certification at a time.

I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued
during the period of January 6, 2014 through January 14, 2014. These
determinations are available on the Department's Web site tradeact/taa/
taa--search--form.cfm under the searchable listing of determinations or
by calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance toll free at 888-
365-6822.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of January 2014.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2014-01538 Filed 1-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.