Certain Digital Models, Digital Data, and Treatment Plans for Use in Making Incremental Dental Positioning Adjustment Appliances, the Appliances Made Therefrom, and Methods of Making the Same; Commission Determination To Extend the Target Date for Completion of the Investigation; Schedule for Filing of Additional Written Submissions From the Parties and the Public, 4174-4175 [2014-01394]
Download as PDF
4174
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 16 / Friday, January 24, 2014 / Notices
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Dated: January 17, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014–01393 Filed 1–23–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–833]
Certain Digital Models, Digital Data,
and Treatment Plans for Use in Making
Incremental Dental Positioning
Adjustment Appliances, the
Appliances Made Therefrom, and
Methods of Making the Same;
Commission Determination To Extend
the Target Date for Completion of the
Investigation; Schedule for Filing of
Additional Written Submissions From
the Parties and the Public
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to extend
the target date for completion of the
above-captioned investigation and to
solicit additional briefing from the
parties and the public.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James A. Worth, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3065. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Jan 23, 2014
Jkt 232001
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
investigation was instituted on April 5,
2012, based upon a complaint filed on
behalf of Align Technology, Inc., of San
Jose, California (‘‘Align’’), on March 1,
2012, as corrected on March 22, 2012.
77 FR 20648 (April 5, 2012). The
complaint alleged violations of Section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C.
1337 (‘‘Section 337’’) in the sale for
importation, importation, or sale within
the United States after importation of
certain digital models, digital data, and
treatment plans for use in making
incremental dental appliances, the
appliances made therefrom, and
methods of making the same by reason
of infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent No. 6,217,325 (‘‘the ‘325 patent’’);
U.S. Patent No. 6,471,511 (‘‘the ‘511
patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,626,666; U.S.
Patent No. 6,705,863 (‘‘the ‘863 patent’’);
U.S. Patent No. 6,722,880 (‘‘the ‘880
patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,134,874 (‘‘the
‘874 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No.
8,070,487 (the ‘487 patent’’). The notice
of institution named as respondents
ClearCorrect Pakistan (Private), Ltd. of
Lahore, Pakistan and ClearCorrect
Operating, LLC of Houston, Texas
(collectively, ‘‘the Respondents’’).
On May 6, 2013, the administrative
law judge issued the final ID, finding a
violation of Section 337 with respect to
the ‘325 patent, the ‘880 patent, the ‘487
patent, the ‘511 patent, ‘863 patent, and
the ‘874 patent. The ALJ recommended
the issuance of cease and desist orders.
On May 20, 2013, Align, the
Respondents, and the Commission
investigative attorney each filed a
petition for review. On May 28, 2013,
each of the parties filed a response
thereto. On June 5, 2013, Align filed a
statement on the public interest. On
June 13, 2013, the Respondents filed a
statement on the public interest.
On June 7, 2013, the Commission
issued notice of its determination to
extend the deadline for determining
whether to review the final ID to July
25, 2013, and to extend the target date
to September 24, 2013.
On July 25, 2013, the Commission
issued notice of its determination to
review the final ID in its entirety and to
solicit briefing on the issues on review
and on remedy, the public interest, and
bonding. 78 FR 46611 (August 1, 2013).
On August 8, 2013, each of the parties
filed written submissions. On August
15, 2013, each filed reply submissions.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
On September 24, 2013, the
Commission issued notice of its
determination to extend the target date
to November 1, 2013.
On November 18, 2013, the
Commission issued notice of its
determination to extend the target date
to January 17, 2014.
The Commission has determined to
extend the target date for completion of
the above-captioned investigation to
March 21, 2014, and to solicit briefing
as follows.
The Commission is interested in
receiving public comment on the
following question:
Question 1: Are electronic
transmissions ‘‘articles’’ within the
meaning of Section 337? Please answer
with respect to the text, structure, and
legislative history of Section 337. Also
address any potentially relevant judicial
precedent, such as Bayer AG v. Housey
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 340 F.3d 1367,
1373–74 (Fed. Cir. 2003), and Suprema,
Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n, lF.3d l.
Nos. 2012–1170, –1026, –1124, 2013 WL
6510929 (Fed. Cir. December 13, 2013);
Commission decisions, including
Certain Hardware Logic Emulation
Systems and Components Thereof, Inv.
No. 337–TA–383 (1998); and any other
potentially informative decisions by
other government agencies.
In addition, the Commission is
interested in public comment and also
encourages submissions by the parties
to the investigation, interested
government agencies, the Office of
Unfair Import Investigations, and any
other interested persons on the
following questions, with reference to
the applicable law, and the existing
evidentiary record:
Question 2: In analyzing whether the
term ‘‘articles’’ encompasses electronic
transmissions, should the Commission
take into account whether the electronic
transmission is of data that is directly
representative of a physical article?
Question 3: Does the term
‘‘processed’’ in Section 337(a)(1)(B)(ii)
include data processing by a computer?
Question 4: Does the term ‘‘a
material’’ in the phrase ‘‘a material or
apparatus for use in practicing a
patented process’’ in 35 U.S.C. 271(c)
include electronic transmissions?
Written Submissions: The written
submissions must be filed no later than
close of business on February 3, 2014.
Reply submissions must be filed no later
than the close of business on February
10, 2014. The written submissions must
be no longer than 50 pages and the reply
submissions must be no longer than 25
pages. No further submissions on these
issues will be permitted unless
otherwise ordered by the Commission.
E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM
24JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 16 / Friday, January 24, 2014 / Notices
Persons filing written submissions
must do so in accordance with
Commission rule 210.4(f), 19 CFR
210.4(f), which requires electronic
filing. The original document and 8 true
copies thereof must also be filed on or
before the deadlines stated above with
the Office of the Secretary. Any person
desiring to submit a document to the
Commission in confidence must request
confidential treatment unless the
information has already been granted
such treatment during the proceedings.
All such requests should be directed to
the Secretary of the Commission and
must include a full statement of the
reasons why the Commission should
grant such treatment. See 19 CFR 210.6.
Documents for which confidential
treatment by the Commission is sought
will be treated accordingly. All nonconfidential written submissions will be
available for public inspection at the
Office of the Secretary and on EDIS.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Dated: January 17, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014–01394 Filed 1–23–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–906]
Certain Standard Cell Libraries,
Products Containing or Made Using
the Same, Integrated Circuits Made
Using the Same, and Products
Containing Such Integrated Circuits;
Institution of Investigation Pursuant to
19 U.S.C. § 1337
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
December 23, 2013, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Tela
Innovations, Inc. of Los Gatos,
California. A letter supplementing the
complaint was filed on January 6, 2014.
The complaint alleges violations of
section 337 based upon the importation
into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:22 Jan 23, 2014
Jkt 232001
United States after importation of
certain standard cell libraries, products
containing or made using the same,
integrated circuits made using the same,
and products containing such integrated
circuits by reason of infringement of
certain claims of U.S. Patent No.
8,490,043 (‘‘the ‘043 patent’’). The
complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337.
The complainants request that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
general exclusion order and cease and
desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record
for this investigation may be viewed on
the Commission’s electronic docket
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2013).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
January 7, 2014, ordered that —
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain standard cell
libraries, products containing or made
using the same, integrated circuits made
using the same, and products containing
such integrated circuits by reason of
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4175
infringement of one or more of claims
1–16 of the ‘043 patent, and whether an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337;
(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule
210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the
presiding administrative law judge shall
take evidence or other information and
hear arguments from the parties and
other interested persons with respect to
the public interest in this investigation,
as appropriate, and provide the
Commission with findings of fact and a
recommended determination on this
issue, which shall be limited to the
statutory public interest factors set forth
in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1);
(3) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is: Tela
Innovations, Inc., 485 Alberto Way,
Suite 115, Los Gatos, CA 95032.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Company, Limited, No. 8, Li-Hsin Rd.
VI, Hsinchu Science Park, Hsinchu,
Taiwan 300–78.
TSMC North America, 2585 Junction
Avenue, San Jose, CA 95134.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(4) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM
24JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 16 (Friday, January 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4174-4175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-01394]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-833]
Certain Digital Models, Digital Data, and Treatment Plans for Use
in Making Incremental Dental Positioning Adjustment Appliances, the
Appliances Made Therefrom, and Methods of Making the Same; Commission
Determination To Extend the Target Date for Completion of the
Investigation; Schedule for Filing of Additional Written Submissions
From the Parties and the Public
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to extend the target date for completion of
the above-captioned investigation and to solicit additional briefing
from the parties and the public.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James A. Worth, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3065. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202)
205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This investigation was instituted on April
5, 2012, based upon a complaint filed on behalf of Align Technology,
Inc., of San Jose, California (``Align''), on March 1, 2012, as
corrected on March 22, 2012. 77 FR 20648 (April 5, 2012). The complaint
alleged violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C.
1337 (``Section 337'') in the sale for importation, importation, or
sale within the United States after importation of certain digital
models, digital data, and treatment plans for use in making incremental
dental appliances, the appliances made therefrom, and methods of making
the same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No.
6,217,325 (``the `325 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,471,511 (``the `511
patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,626,666; U.S. Patent No. 6,705,863 (``the
`863 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,722,880 (``the `880 patent''); U.S.
Patent No. 7,134,874 (``the `874 patent''); and U.S. Patent No.
8,070,487 (the `487 patent''). The notice of institution named as
respondents ClearCorrect Pakistan (Private), Ltd. of Lahore, Pakistan
and ClearCorrect Operating, LLC of Houston, Texas (collectively, ``the
Respondents'').
On May 6, 2013, the administrative law judge issued the final ID,
finding a violation of Section 337 with respect to the `325 patent, the
`880 patent, the `487 patent, the `511 patent, `863 patent, and the
`874 patent. The ALJ recommended the issuance of cease and desist
orders.
On May 20, 2013, Align, the Respondents, and the Commission
investigative attorney each filed a petition for review. On May 28,
2013, each of the parties filed a response thereto. On June 5, 2013,
Align filed a statement on the public interest. On June 13, 2013, the
Respondents filed a statement on the public interest.
On June 7, 2013, the Commission issued notice of its determination
to extend the deadline for determining whether to review the final ID
to July 25, 2013, and to extend the target date to September 24, 2013.
On July 25, 2013, the Commission issued notice of its determination
to review the final ID in its entirety and to solicit briefing on the
issues on review and on remedy, the public interest, and bonding. 78 FR
46611 (August 1, 2013). On August 8, 2013, each of the parties filed
written submissions. On August 15, 2013, each filed reply submissions.
On September 24, 2013, the Commission issued notice of its
determination to extend the target date to November 1, 2013.
On November 18, 2013, the Commission issued notice of its
determination to extend the target date to January 17, 2014.
The Commission has determined to extend the target date for
completion of the above-captioned investigation to March 21, 2014, and
to solicit briefing as follows.
The Commission is interested in receiving public comment on the
following question:
Question 1: Are electronic transmissions ``articles'' within the
meaning of Section 337? Please answer with respect to the text,
structure, and legislative history of Section 337. Also address any
potentially relevant judicial precedent, such as Bayer AG v. Housey
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 340 F.3d 1367, 1373-74 (Fed. Cir. 2003), and
Suprema, Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n, --F.3d --. Nos. 2012-1170, -1026,
-1124, 2013 WL 6510929 (Fed. Cir. December 13, 2013); Commission
decisions, including Certain Hardware Logic Emulation Systems and
Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-383 (1998); and any other
potentially informative decisions by other government agencies.
In addition, the Commission is interested in public comment and
also encourages submissions by the parties to the investigation,
interested government agencies, the Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, and any other interested persons on the following
questions, with reference to the applicable law, and the existing
evidentiary record:
Question 2: In analyzing whether the term ``articles'' encompasses
electronic transmissions, should the Commission take into account
whether the electronic transmission is of data that is directly
representative of a physical article?
Question 3: Does the term ``processed'' in Section 337(a)(1)(B)(ii)
include data processing by a computer?
Question 4: Does the term ``a material'' in the phrase ``a material
or apparatus for use in practicing a patented process'' in 35 U.S.C.
271(c) include electronic transmissions?
Written Submissions: The written submissions must be filed no later
than close of business on February 3, 2014. Reply submissions must be
filed no later than the close of business on February 10, 2014. The
written submissions must be no longer than 50 pages and the reply
submissions must be no longer than 25 pages. No further submissions on
these issues will be permitted unless otherwise ordered by the
Commission.
[[Page 4175]]
Persons filing written submissions must do so in accordance with
Commission rule 210.4(f), 19 CFR 210.4(f), which requires electronic
filing. The original document and 8 true copies thereof must also be
filed on or before the deadlines stated above with the Office of the
Secretary. Any person desiring to submit a document to the Commission
in confidence must request confidential treatment unless the
information has already been granted such treatment during the
proceedings. All such requests should be directed to the Secretary of
the Commission and must include a full statement of the reasons why the
Commission should grant such treatment. See 19 CFR 210.6. Documents for
which confidential treatment by the Commission is sought will be
treated accordingly. All non-confidential written submissions will be
available for public inspection at the Office of the Secretary and on
EDIS.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Dated: January 17, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014-01394 Filed 1-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P