Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Amending NYSE Rules 13, 70.25, 107C and 1000 To Adopt a New Order Type Called a Midpoint Passive Liquidity Order, 3895-3897 [2014-01251]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 15 / Thursday, January 23, 2014 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, pursuant to
delegated authority.
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–01256 Filed 1–22–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–71330; File No. SR–NYSE–
2013–71]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change
Amending NYSE Rules 13, 70.25, 107C
and 1000 To Adopt a New Order Type
Called a Midpoint Passive Liquidity
Order
January 16, 2014.
I. Introduction
On November 18, 2013, New York
Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
amend: (1) NYSE Rule 13 to adopt a
new order type called a Midpoint
Passive Liquidity (‘‘MPL’’) Order; (2)
NYSE Rule 1000 to specify that the
proposed MPL Orders may interact with
Capital Commitment Schedule (‘‘CCS’’)
interest; (3) NYSE Rule 70.25 to permit
d-Quotes to be designated with a
midpoint modifier in order to set the
discretionary price to the midpoint of
the protected best bid or best offer
(‘‘PBBO’’); and (4) NYSE Rule 107C to
incorporate the proposed MPL Order
into the Retail Liquidity Program. The
proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register on
December 4, 2013.3 The Commission
received no comment letters on the
proposed rule change. This order
approves the proposed rule change.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
II. Description of the Proposed Rule
Change
A. Proposed MPL Order
The Exchange proposes the MPL
Order as an undisplayed limit order that
would automatically execute at the midpoint of the protected best bid (‘‘PBB’’)
and the protected best offer (‘‘PBO’’). An
MPL Order could interact with any
incoming order, including another MPL
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70956
(November 27, 2013), 78 FR 72968.
Order, and could execute at prices out
to four decimal places.
The proposed rule specifies certain
limitations on the usage and execution
of an MPL Order. First, an MPL Order
would not be eligible to trade if it would
trade at a price below $1.00 or if the
execution price would be out to five
decimal places above $1.00. Second, an
MPL Order could not be designated as
Good Till Cancelled. Finally, an MPL
Order would not execute if the market
were locked or crossed. When a market
that had been locked or crossed
becomes no longer locked or crossed,
the Exchange would execute all eligible
MPL Orders and other hidden interest
eligible to execute at the midpoint of the
PBBO.
With regards to order allocation, MPL
Orders would be allocated on a parityby-agent basis, consistent with NYSE
Rule 72. Moreover, an MPL Order’s time
priority would be based on its time of
entry into Exchange systems and would
not reset when an MPL Order’s price
shifted due to changes in the PBBO.
Under the proposal, an MPL Order
could also include a Minimum
Triggering Volume (‘‘MTV’’), in which
case the MPL Order would not be
eligible to trade unless the aggregated
contra-side quantity of all interest
marketable at the midpoint of the PBBO
were equal to or greater than the MPL
Order’s MTV. There would be no
guaranteed trade size based on the MTV.
Exchange systems would enforce an
MTV restriction even if the unexecuted
portion of an MPL Order with an MTV
were less than the MTV.
An MPL Order that included an MTV
would be rejected if it also included a
Self Trade Prevention (‘‘STP’’) Modifier.
As proposed, STP Modifiers could be
used with MPL Orders that do not
include an MTV. An MPL Order with an
STP Modifier, however, might be
cancelled depending on the type of
order on the contra-side. An MPL Order
with an STP Modifier would not
execute against another MPL Order or
against a non-MPL Order with an STP
Modifier with the same market
participant identifier (‘‘MPID’’).
Further, under the proposal, users
could designate an MPL Order with an
add-liquidity-only (‘‘ALO’’) modifier
(‘‘MPL–ALO Order’’). An MPL–ALO
Order would not execute on arrival,
even if marketable, but would remain
non-displayed in the book until
triggered to trade by arriving contra-side
marketable interest. An incoming nonmarketable MPL–ALO Order, however,
could trigger a discretionary trade.4 An
2 17
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:50 Jan 22, 2014
Jkt 232001
4 Under the proposal, an MPL–ALO Order
triggering a discretionary trade would be the
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3895
MPL–ALO Order would only be eligible
to trade against incoming contra-side
interest and would not interact with
contra-side interest resting in the book.
A resting MPL–ALO Order would not be
eligible to trade when arriving sameside interest triggered a trade with
contra-side interest. An MPL–ALO
Order would have to be at least one
round lot.
An MPL Order would not be eligible
for manual executions, including
openings, re-openings, or closing
transactions. As such, MPL Orders
would not be available to be designated
as Limit ‘‘On-the-Open’’ (‘‘LOO’’) or
Limit ‘‘At-the-Close’’ (‘‘LOC’’) Orders.
As fully undisplayed interest, MPL
Orders would not be visible to the DMM
on the Floor under any circumstances.
Additionally, MPL Orders would not
be available to be entered for highpriced securities. High-priced securities
are securities with a closing price—or,
if the security did not trade, the closing
bid price—on the Exchange of $10,000
or more on the previous trading day.5
Such securities are not available for
automatic execution. Because MPL
Orders are not eligible for manual
executions, MPL Orders would not be
available for these high-priced
securities.
B. MPL Order Interaction With CCS
Interest
The CCS is a liquidity schedule
setting forth various price points at
which the DMM is willing to interact
with incoming orders. CCS interest will
either execute at the price at which the
full size of the order can be satisfied
(‘‘completion price’’) or at the next price
that is one minimum price variation
(‘‘MPV’’) higher (in the case of an order
to sell) or lower (in the case of an order
to buy). The Exchange has stated that it
believes that CCS interest cannot be
designated as an MPL Order because
MPL Orders are priced at the midpoint
of the PBBO and could be priced less
than one MPV above or below the
completion price.
While, under the proposal, CCS
interest cannot be designated as an MPL
Order, CCS interest would be eligible to
interact with MPL Orders. Currently,
CCS interest is eligible to trade inside
the Exchange BBO at a price
representing (1) the non-displayable
reserve interest of Reserve Orders 6 or
(2) the reserve interest of Floor broker
agency interest files. The Exchange is
‘‘liquidity provider,’’ and the triggered discretionary
order would be the ‘‘liquidity taker.’’
5 See NYSE Rule 1000(a)(vi).
6 A Reserve Order means a limit order entered
into Exchange systems that may contain displayable
and non displayable interest. See NYSE Rule 13.
E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM
23JAN1
3896
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 15 / Thursday, January 23, 2014 / Notices
proposing to expand this list by
amending NYSE Rule 1000(f)(1)(B) to
include MPL Orders.
C. Proposed MPL Order Interaction With
d-Quotes
MPL Orders would not be available
for d-Quotes 7 since the Exchange
proposes to allow d-Quotes with a midpoint modifier as described below. MPL
Orders would not be available for
pegging interest since pegging interest is
set to track the PBB or the PBO as the
PBBO changes, while MPL Orders
would always be priced at the midpoint
of the PBBO.
The Exchange proposes to make a
midpoint modifier available for dQuotes that would have a discretionary
range up to the midpoint of the PBBO.8
In order to accommodate the use of a
midpoint modifier, the Exchange is
proposing to amend Rule 70.25(b)(ii),
which states that the minimum price
range for a d-Quote is the minimum
price variation set forth in Exchange
Rule 62. Rule 62 sets the minimum
price variation at $0.01 for stocks priced
greater than $1.00. However, with the
midpoint modifier, a d-Quote can have
a minimum price variation of $0.005.
Therefore, the Exchange is proposing to
amend this restriction by excepting dQuotes with a midpoint modifier.
D. Incorporation of MPL Orders Into
Retail Liquidity Program
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Retail Orders or Retail Price
Improvement Interest, as defined in
NYSE Rule 107C, could not be
designated as MPL Orders. MPL Orders,
however, could interact with incoming
Retail Orders.
The Exchange proposed that MPL
Orders be available to interact with
Retail Orders within the Retail Liquidity
Program (‘‘Retail Program’’), a pilot
program.9 The Exchange proposes to
7 See NYSE Rule 70.25 (defining d-Quotes as
discretionary instructions with respect to a Floor
broker’s agency interest file (e-Quotes)).
8 The Exchange notes that the MPL Order and the
midpoint modifier are distinct functionalities. An
MPL Order would always be priced at the midpoint
of the PBBO and would execute at that price. A dQuote designated with a midpoint modifier would
use its discretion to execute up to the midpoint but
could execute at a less-aggressive price. As such, a
d-Quote with a midpoint modifier would operate as
a d-Quote that updated with changes in the PBBO
to set the discretionary price range to the midpoint
of the PBBO.
9 Under the Retail Program, retail liquidity
providers (‘‘Providers’’) are able to provide
potential price improvement in the form of a nondisplayed order that is priced better than the PBBO,
called a Retail Price Improvement Order (‘‘RPI’’).
Retail Member Organizations (‘‘RMOs’’) can submit
a Retail Order to the Exchange, which interacts, to
the extent possible, with available contra-side RPIs.
Retail Orders may be designated as Type 1, Type
2, or Type 3. A Type 1 Retail Order interacts with
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:50 Jan 22, 2014
Jkt 232001
permit all Retail Orders to interact with,
in addition to available contra-side RPIs,
available contra-side MPL Orders. When
determining the price to execute a Retail
Order, Exchange systems would
consider all eligible RPIs and MPL
Orders. If the only interest were MPL
Orders, the Retail Order would execute
against one or more MPL Orders at the
midpoint of the PBBO. If the only
interest were RPIs, then the execution
would occur against one or more RPIs
at the price level that completes the
incoming order’s execution. If both RPIs
and MPL Orders were present on the
book, then Exchange systems would
determine the price level at which the
incoming Retail Order could be
executed in full (‘‘clean-up price’’). If
the clean-up price were equal to the
midpoint of the PBBO, RPIs would
receive priority over MPL Orders, and
Retail Orders would execute against
both RPIs and MPL Orders at the
midpoint. If the clean-up price were
worse than the midpoint of the PBBO,
the Retail Order would execute first
with the MPL Orders at the midpoint of
the PBBO, and any remaining quantity
of the Retail Order would execute with
the RPIs at the clean-up price. If the
clean-up price were better than the
midpoint of the PBBO, then the Retail
Order would execute against the RPIs at
the clean-up price and would ignore the
MPL Orders.
III. Discussion and Commission’s
Findings
After careful review, the Commission
finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the requirements of the
Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national
securities exchange.10 In particular, the
Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,11 which requires,
among other things, that the rules of a
national securities exchange be
designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
available contra-side RPIs and does not interact
with other available contra-side interest in
Exchange systems or route to other markets. A Type
2 Retail Order interacts with available contra-side
RPIs and any remaining portion of the Retail Order
is executed as a Regulation NMS-compliant
Immediate or Cancel Order pursuant to NYSE Rule
13. A Type 3 Retail Order interacts first with
available contra-side RPIs and any remaining
portion of the Retail Order is executed as an NYSE
Immediate or Cancel Order pursuant to Rule 13.
10 In approving this proposed rule change, the
Commission notes that it has considered the
proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
general, to protect investors and the
public interest and that the rules of a
national securities exchange not be
designed to permit unfair
discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
The Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the requirements of the Act. The
Commission believes that the proposed
MPL Order is designed to enhance order
execution opportunities on the
Exchange by providing market
participants with an additional order
type to interact with other trading
interests. The Commission also believes
that the proposed MPL Orders is
designed to allow for additional
opportunities for investors to trade at
the midpoint of the PBBO, which may
provide price improvement to incoming
orders. Additionally, the Commission
believes that the proposed introduction
of the MPL Order could provide market
participants with better control over
their execution costs and with a means
to offer price improvement
opportunities. The Commission notes
that other exchanges offer similar
functions as the MPL Order.12
The Commission believes that it is
appropriate for the Exchange not to
allow DMMs to enter MPL Orders
through CCS, because CCS interest must
observe the MPV in certain
circumstances, but MPL Orders would
be tied to the midpoint of the protected
NBBO and could therefore have prices
that do not observe the MPV. Further,
the Commission believes that it is
appropriate not to allow d-Quotes to
enter MPL Orders, as d-Quotes would
have a mid-point modifier that would
provide a functionality similar to MPL
Orders.13 Finally, the Commission
believes that allowing MPL Orders to
interact with retail orders in the Retail
Program is designed to expand the
potential for price improvement to retail
investors.
Therefore, the Commission finds that
the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,14 that the
proposed rule change (SR–NYSE–2013–
71) be, and it hereby is, approved.
12 See e.g., NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.31(h)(5).
See also EDGA Exchange, Inc. Rule 11.5(c)(7);
BATS Exchange, Inc. Rule 11.9(c)(9); and NASDAQ
Stock Market LLC Rule 4751(f)(4).
13 The Commission notes that pegging interests
would also conflict with the nature of MPL Order,
since pegging interests are orders that are pegged to
the PBB or PBO as the PBBO changes. See NYSE
Rule 13.
14 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM
23JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 15 / Thursday, January 23, 2014 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.15
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–01251 Filed 1–22–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–71327; File No. SR–BATS–
2014–003]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a
Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment No. 1 Thereto, To Modify
the BATS Options Opening Process
January 16, 2014.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on January 6,
2014, BATS Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BATS’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. On January 16, 2014,
the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to
the proposed rule change.3 The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The Exchange filed a proposal to
amend Rule 20.3, entitled ‘‘Trading
Halts,’’ Rule 20.4, entitled ‘‘Resumption
of Trading After a Halt,’’ and Rule 21.7,
entitled ‘‘Market Opening Procedures’’
in order to modify the manner in which
the Exchange’s equity options trading
platform (‘‘BATS Options’’) opens
trading at the beginning of the day and
after trading halts.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available at the Exchange’s Web site
at https://www.batstrading.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room,
and at the Commission’s Web site at
https://www.sec.gov.
15 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange corrected a
typographical error contained in its original
submission related to its description of how the
Exchange’s Rule 20.6, governing Obvious Errors,
currently operates.
1 15
VerDate Mar<15>2010
21:50 Jan 22, 2014
Jkt 232001
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule
changes is to amend Exchange Rules
20.3, 20.4, and 21.7 in order to allow
BATS Options to accept orders and
quotes in all options series prior to the
first transaction in the underlying
security on the primary listing market
and during a halt, as well as to establish
a process for matching such orders
immediately prior to the opening of
trading in such options series.
Currently, BATS Options does not
accept any orders or quotes while
trading is not open in an options class.
This includes both prior to the first
transaction in the underlying security
on the primary listing market and
during a halt. BATS Options currently
opens trading in options: (i) After the
first transaction on the primary listing
market after 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time in
the securities underlying the options as
reported on the first print disseminated
pursuant to an effective national market
system plan; or (ii) any time after 9:30
a.m. Eastern Time where the Exchange
determines that the interests of a fair
and orderly market are best served by
opening trading in the options contracts.
With respect to index options, trading
opens at 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time. The
Exchange may also delay the
commencement of trading in any class
of options in the interests of a fair and
orderly market. Upon a halt, the
Exchange currently cancels all orders
and quotes and trading does not resume
upon the determination by the Exchange
that the conditions that led to the halt
are no longer present or that the
interests of a fair and orderly market are
best served by a resumption of trading,
as provided under Rule 20.4.
The Exchange is proposing to amend
its Rules in order to accept orders and
quotes before trading is open for a given
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3897
options series. Specifically, the
Exchange is proposing to begin
accepting orders and quotes in all series
at 8:00 a.m. Eastern Time and
immediately upon a Regulatory Halt 4
and will continue to accept orders and
quotes until such time as the Opening
Process 5 is initiated. Such orders and
quotes will be queued for participation
in the Opening Process, as further
described below, and will not be eligible
for execution until the Opening Process
occurs. The Exchange will not accept
IOC or WAIT orders for queuing prior to
the completion of the Opening Process.
Limit orders queued during this time
will be disseminated via the Options
Price Reporting Authority as non-firm
quotes and via BATS Multicast PITCH.
Market orders queued during this time
will not be disseminated. Where trading
is halted pursuant to Rule 20.3, but it is
not due to a Regulatory Halt, there will
be no Order Entry Period and trading
will be resumed upon the determination
by the Exchange that the conditions
which led to the halt are no longer
present or that the interests of a fair and
orderly market are best served by a
resumption of trading.
The Exchange is also proposing to
amend Rule 20.3(b) such that, upon a
halt, all orders will be cancelled unless
a User has entered instructions not to
cancel its orders, at which point the
System would queue such orders as part
of the Order Entry Period.6 The
Exchange is also proposing to amend
Rule 20.4 in order to reference Rule 21.7
as the process for which trading in an
option that has been the subject of a halt
shall be resumed.
As described above, the Exchange is
proposing to accept orders and quotes
prior to trading opening for a given
series. Where there are no contracts in
a particular series that would execute at
any price at the time that the Exchange
would determine the Opening Price,7
the Exchange will open such options for
trading without determining an Opening
Price. Where there is a price at which
at least one contract would execute, the
Exchange proposes that within thirty
seconds after the First Listing Market
Transaction 8 or the Regulatory Halt
4 As defined in proposed Rule 21.7(a), Regulatory
Halt means trading being halted in an option series
due to the primary listing market for the applicable
underlying security declaring a regulatory trading
halt, suspension, or pause with respect to such
security.
5 As defined in proposed Rule 21.7(a).
6 As defined in proposed Rule 21.7(a).
7 As defined in proposed Rule 21.7(a)(1), Opening
Price means the single price at which a particular
option series will be opened.
8 As defined in proposed Rule 21.7(a), First
Listing Market Transaction means the first
E:\FR\FM\23JAN1.SGM
Continued
23JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 15 (Thursday, January 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3895-3897]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-01251]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-71330; File No. SR-NYSE-2013-71]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change Amending NYSE Rules 13, 70.25, 107C and
1000 To Adopt a New Order Type Called a Midpoint Passive Liquidity
Order
January 16, 2014.
I. Introduction
On November 18, 2013, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to amend: (1) NYSE Rule 13 to adopt a new order
type called a Midpoint Passive Liquidity (``MPL'') Order; (2) NYSE Rule
1000 to specify that the proposed MPL Orders may interact with Capital
Commitment Schedule (``CCS'') interest; (3) NYSE Rule 70.25 to permit
d-Quotes to be designated with a midpoint modifier in order to set the
discretionary price to the midpoint of the protected best bid or best
offer (``PBBO''); and (4) NYSE Rule 107C to incorporate the proposed
MPL Order into the Retail Liquidity Program. The proposed rule change
was published for comment in the Federal Register on December 4,
2013.\3\ The Commission received no comment letters on the proposed
rule change. This order approves the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70956 (November 27,
2013), 78 FR 72968.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description of the Proposed Rule Change
A. Proposed MPL Order
The Exchange proposes the MPL Order as an undisplayed limit order
that would automatically execute at the mid-point of the protected best
bid (``PBB'') and the protected best offer (``PBO''). An MPL Order
could interact with any incoming order, including another MPL Order,
and could execute at prices out to four decimal places.
The proposed rule specifies certain limitations on the usage and
execution of an MPL Order. First, an MPL Order would not be eligible to
trade if it would trade at a price below $1.00 or if the execution
price would be out to five decimal places above $1.00. Second, an MPL
Order could not be designated as Good Till Cancelled. Finally, an MPL
Order would not execute if the market were locked or crossed. When a
market that had been locked or crossed becomes no longer locked or
crossed, the Exchange would execute all eligible MPL Orders and other
hidden interest eligible to execute at the midpoint of the PBBO.
With regards to order allocation, MPL Orders would be allocated on
a parity-by-agent basis, consistent with NYSE Rule 72. Moreover, an MPL
Order's time priority would be based on its time of entry into Exchange
systems and would not reset when an MPL Order's price shifted due to
changes in the PBBO.
Under the proposal, an MPL Order could also include a Minimum
Triggering Volume (``MTV''), in which case the MPL Order would not be
eligible to trade unless the aggregated contra-side quantity of all
interest marketable at the midpoint of the PBBO were equal to or
greater than the MPL Order's MTV. There would be no guaranteed trade
size based on the MTV. Exchange systems would enforce an MTV
restriction even if the unexecuted portion of an MPL Order with an MTV
were less than the MTV.
An MPL Order that included an MTV would be rejected if it also
included a Self Trade Prevention (``STP'') Modifier. As proposed, STP
Modifiers could be used with MPL Orders that do not include an MTV. An
MPL Order with an STP Modifier, however, might be cancelled depending
on the type of order on the contra-side. An MPL Order with an STP
Modifier would not execute against another MPL Order or against a non-
MPL Order with an STP Modifier with the same market participant
identifier (``MPID'').
Further, under the proposal, users could designate an MPL Order
with an add-liquidity-only (``ALO'') modifier (``MPL-ALO Order''). An
MPL-ALO Order would not execute on arrival, even if marketable, but
would remain non-displayed in the book until triggered to trade by
arriving contra-side marketable interest. An incoming non-marketable
MPL-ALO Order, however, could trigger a discretionary trade.\4\ An MPL-
ALO Order would only be eligible to trade against incoming contra-side
interest and would not interact with contra-side interest resting in
the book. A resting MPL-ALO Order would not be eligible to trade when
arriving same-side interest triggered a trade with contra-side
interest. An MPL-ALO Order would have to be at least one round lot.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Under the proposal, an MPL-ALO Order triggering a
discretionary trade would be the ``liquidity provider,'' and the
triggered discretionary order would be the ``liquidity taker.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
An MPL Order would not be eligible for manual executions, including
openings, re-openings, or closing transactions. As such, MPL Orders
would not be available to be designated as Limit ``On-the-Open''
(``LOO'') or Limit ``At-the-Close'' (``LOC'') Orders. As fully
undisplayed interest, MPL Orders would not be visible to the DMM on the
Floor under any circumstances.
Additionally, MPL Orders would not be available to be entered for
high-priced securities. High-priced securities are securities with a
closing price--or, if the security did not trade, the closing bid
price--on the Exchange of $10,000 or more on the previous trading
day.\5\ Such securities are not available for automatic execution.
Because MPL Orders are not eligible for manual executions, MPL Orders
would not be available for these high-priced securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See NYSE Rule 1000(a)(vi).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. MPL Order Interaction With CCS Interest
The CCS is a liquidity schedule setting forth various price points
at which the DMM is willing to interact with incoming orders. CCS
interest will either execute at the price at which the full size of the
order can be satisfied (``completion price'') or at the next price that
is one minimum price variation (``MPV'') higher (in the case of an
order to sell) or lower (in the case of an order to buy). The Exchange
has stated that it believes that CCS interest cannot be designated as
an MPL Order because MPL Orders are priced at the midpoint of the PBBO
and could be priced less than one MPV above or below the completion
price.
While, under the proposal, CCS interest cannot be designated as an
MPL Order, CCS interest would be eligible to interact with MPL Orders.
Currently, CCS interest is eligible to trade inside the Exchange BBO at
a price representing (1) the non-displayable reserve interest of
Reserve Orders \6\ or (2) the reserve interest of Floor broker agency
interest files. The Exchange is
[[Page 3896]]
proposing to expand this list by amending NYSE Rule 1000(f)(1)(B) to
include MPL Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ A Reserve Order means a limit order entered into Exchange
systems that may contain displayable and non displayable interest.
See NYSE Rule 13.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Proposed MPL Order Interaction With d-Quotes
MPL Orders would not be available for d-Quotes \7\ since the
Exchange proposes to allow d-Quotes with a mid-point modifier as
described below. MPL Orders would not be available for pegging interest
since pegging interest is set to track the PBB or the PBO as the PBBO
changes, while MPL Orders would always be priced at the midpoint of the
PBBO.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See NYSE Rule 70.25 (defining d-Quotes as discretionary
instructions with respect to a Floor broker's agency interest file
(e-Quotes)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to make a midpoint modifier available for d-
Quotes that would have a discretionary range up to the midpoint of the
PBBO.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ The Exchange notes that the MPL Order and the midpoint
modifier are distinct functionalities. An MPL Order would always be
priced at the midpoint of the PBBO and would execute at that price.
A d-Quote designated with a midpoint modifier would use its
discretion to execute up to the midpoint but could execute at a
less-aggressive price. As such, a d-Quote with a midpoint modifier
would operate as a d-Quote that updated with changes in the PBBO to
set the discretionary price range to the midpoint of the PBBO.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In order to accommodate the use of a midpoint modifier, the
Exchange is proposing to amend Rule 70.25(b)(ii), which states that the
minimum price range for a d-Quote is the minimum price variation set
forth in Exchange Rule 62. Rule 62 sets the minimum price variation at
$0.01 for stocks priced greater than $1.00. However, with the midpoint
modifier, a d-Quote can have a minimum price variation of $0.005.
Therefore, the Exchange is proposing to amend this restriction by
excepting d-Quotes with a midpoint modifier.
D. Incorporation of MPL Orders Into Retail Liquidity Program
Retail Orders or Retail Price Improvement Interest, as defined in
NYSE Rule 107C, could not be designated as MPL Orders. MPL Orders,
however, could interact with incoming Retail Orders.
The Exchange proposed that MPL Orders be available to interact with
Retail Orders within the Retail Liquidity Program (``Retail Program''),
a pilot program.\9\ The Exchange proposes to permit all Retail Orders
to interact with, in addition to available contra-side RPIs, available
contra-side MPL Orders. When determining the price to execute a Retail
Order, Exchange systems would consider all eligible RPIs and MPL
Orders. If the only interest were MPL Orders, the Retail Order would
execute against one or more MPL Orders at the midpoint of the PBBO. If
the only interest were RPIs, then the execution would occur against one
or more RPIs at the price level that completes the incoming order's
execution. If both RPIs and MPL Orders were present on the book, then
Exchange systems would determine the price level at which the incoming
Retail Order could be executed in full (``clean-up price''). If the
clean-up price were equal to the midpoint of the PBBO, RPIs would
receive priority over MPL Orders, and Retail Orders would execute
against both RPIs and MPL Orders at the midpoint. If the clean-up price
were worse than the midpoint of the PBBO, the Retail Order would
execute first with the MPL Orders at the midpoint of the PBBO, and any
remaining quantity of the Retail Order would execute with the RPIs at
the clean-up price. If the clean-up price were better than the midpoint
of the PBBO, then the Retail Order would execute against the RPIs at
the clean-up price and would ignore the MPL Orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Under the Retail Program, retail liquidity providers
(``Providers'') are able to provide potential price improvement in
the form of a non-displayed order that is priced better than the
PBBO, called a Retail Price Improvement Order (``RPI''). Retail
Member Organizations (``RMOs'') can submit a Retail Order to the
Exchange, which interacts, to the extent possible, with available
contra-side RPIs. Retail Orders may be designated as Type 1, Type 2,
or Type 3. A Type 1 Retail Order interacts with available contra-
side RPIs and does not interact with other available contra-side
interest in Exchange systems or route to other markets. A Type 2
Retail Order interacts with available contra-side RPIs and any
remaining portion of the Retail Order is executed as a Regulation
NMS-compliant Immediate or Cancel Order pursuant to NYSE Rule 13. A
Type 3 Retail Order interacts first with available contra-side RPIs
and any remaining portion of the Retail Order is executed as an NYSE
Immediate or Cancel Order pursuant to Rule 13.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Discussion and Commission's Findings
After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities
exchange.\10\ In particular, the Commission finds that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\11\ which
requires, among other things, that the rules of a national securities
exchange be designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade,
to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest and that the rules of a national
securities exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination
between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission
notes that it has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act. The Commission believes that the
proposed MPL Order is designed to enhance order execution opportunities
on the Exchange by providing market participants with an additional
order type to interact with other trading interests. The Commission
also believes that the proposed MPL Orders is designed to allow for
additional opportunities for investors to trade at the midpoint of the
PBBO, which may provide price improvement to incoming orders.
Additionally, the Commission believes that the proposed introduction of
the MPL Order could provide market participants with better control
over their execution costs and with a means to offer price improvement
opportunities. The Commission notes that other exchanges offer similar
functions as the MPL Order.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See e.g., NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.31(h)(5). See also EDGA
Exchange, Inc. Rule 11.5(c)(7); BATS Exchange, Inc. Rule 11.9(c)(9);
and NASDAQ Stock Market LLC Rule 4751(f)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission believes that it is appropriate for the Exchange not
to allow DMMs to enter MPL Orders through CCS, because CCS interest
must observe the MPV in certain circumstances, but MPL Orders would be
tied to the midpoint of the protected NBBO and could therefore have
prices that do not observe the MPV. Further, the Commission believes
that it is appropriate not to allow d-Quotes to enter MPL Orders, as d-
Quotes would have a mid-point modifier that would provide a
functionality similar to MPL Orders.\13\ Finally, the Commission
believes that allowing MPL Orders to interact with retail orders in the
Retail Program is designed to expand the potential for price
improvement to retail investors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ The Commission notes that pegging interests would also
conflict with the nature of MPL Order, since pegging interests are
orders that are pegged to the PBB or PBO as the PBBO changes. See
NYSE Rule 13.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Therefore, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the requirements of the Act.
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\14\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NYSE-2013-71) be, and it
hereby is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
[[Page 3897]]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-01251 Filed 1-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P