Certain Rubber Resins and Processes for Manufacturing Same; Commission Determination To Affirm-in-Part and Reverse-in-Part the Final Initial Determination of the Administrative Law Judge and To Terminate the Investigation With a Finding of Violation With Respect to Certain Respondents; Issuance of Limited Exclusion Order, 3624-3625 [2014-01109]
Download as PDF
3624
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 14 / Wednesday, January 22, 2014 / Notices
By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–Ta–849]
[FR Doc. 2014–01103 Filed 1–21–14; 8:45 am]
Certain Off-the-Road Tires From China
Certain Rubber Resins and Processes
for Manufacturing Same; Commission
Determination To Affirm-in-Part and
Reverse-in-Part the Final Initial
Determination of the Administrative
Law Judge and To Terminate the
Investigation With a Finding of
Violation With Respect to Certain
Respondents; Issuance of Limited
Exclusion Order
Determination
AGENCY:
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–448 and 731–
TA–1117 (Review)]
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year reviews, the
United States International Trade
Commission (Commission) determines,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that
revocation of the countervailing duty
order and antidumping duty order on
certain off-the-road tires from China
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a
reasonably foreseeable time.
Background
The Commission instituted these
reviews on August 1, 2013 (78 FR
46607) and determined on November
20, 2013 that it would conduct
expedited reviews (78 FR 73560,
December 6, 2013).
The Commission completed and filed
its determinations in these reviews on
January 15, 2014. The views of the
Commission are contained in USITC
Publication 4448 (January 2014),
entitled Certain Off-the-Road Tires from
China: Investigation Nos. 701–TA–448
and 731–TA–1117 (Review).
Dated: January 15, 2014.
By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014–01102 Filed 1–21–14; 8:45 am]
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:00 Jan 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to affirmin-part and reverse-in-part the final
initial determination (‘‘final ID’’) of the
administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) in the
above-identified investigation and to
terminate the investigation with a
finding of violation with respect to
certain respondents. The Commission
has issued a limited exclusion order.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James A. Worth, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–
205–3065. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone 202–205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on 202–205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on June 26, 2012, based on a complaint
filed on behalf of SI Group, Inc. of
Schenectady, New York (‘‘SI Group’’) on
May 21, 2012, as supplemented on June
12, 2012. 77 FR 38083–84 (June 26,
2012). The complaint alleged violations
of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘Section
337’’), in the sale for importation,
importation, or sale after importation
into the United States of certain rubber
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
resins by reason of misappropriation of
trade secrets, the threat or effect of
which is to destroy or substantially
injure an industry in the United States.
The Commission’s notice of
investigation named as respondents Red
Avenue Chemical Corp. of America of
Rochester, New York; Thomas R.
Crumlish, Jr. of Rochester, New York;
Precision Measurement International
LLC of Westland, Michigan; Sino
Legend (Zhangjiagang) Chemical Co.,
Ltd. of Zhangjiagang City, China; Sino
Legend Holding Group, Inc. c/o Mr.
Richard A. Peters of Kowloon, Hong
Kong; Sino Legend Holding Group Ltd.
of Hong Kong; HongKong Sino Legend
Group, Ltd. of North Point, Hong Kong;
Red Avenue Chemical Co. Ltd. of
Shanghai, China; Ning Zhang of North
Vancouver, Canada; Quanhai Yang of
Beijing, China; and Shanghai Lunsai
International Trading Company of
Shanghai City, China. A Commission
investigative attorney participated in
this investigation.
On January 14, 2013, the Commission
issued notice of its determination not to
review an ID to amend the complaint
and notice of investigation to add Red
Avenue Group Limited of Kowloon,
Hong Kong; Sino Legend Holding Group
Inc. of Majuro, Marshall Islands; Gold
Dynasty Limited c/o ATC Trustees
(Cayman) Limited of Grand Cayman,
Cayman Islands; Elite Holding Group
Inc. c/o Morgan & Morgan Trust
Corporation (Belize) Limited of Belize
City, Belize as respondents. 78 FR 3817–
18 (January 17, 2013).
On June 17, 2013, the presiding ALJ
issued his final ID, finding a violation
of Section 337. On July 1, 2013, SI and
the Respondents filed petitions for
review. On July 9, 2013, SI, the
Respondents, and the Commission
investigative attorney filed responses
thereto. On July 16, 2013, Respondents
filed a notice of new authority. On July
24, 2013, the Complainant submitted an
objection to the notice of new authority.
The following parties and members of
the public have submitted statements on
the public interest: the Complainant
(July 17, 2013); the New York State
Chemical Alliance (August 14, 2013);
and the American Chemistry Council
(August 14, 2013).
On September 9, 2013, the
Commission issued notice of its
determination to review the final ID in
its entirety and to solicit briefing on the
issues on review and on remedy, the
public interest, and bonding. 78 FR
56734–36 (Sept. 13, 2013). On
September 23, 2013, each of the parties
filed a written submission, and on
September 30, 2013, each of the parties
filed a reply submission.
E:\FR\FM\22JAN1.SGM
22JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 14 / Wednesday, January 22, 2014 / Notices
After considering the written
submissions on review and the record in
this investigation, the Commission has
determined to affirm-in-part and
reverse-in-part the final ID of the ALJ
and to terminate the investigation with
a finding of violation of Section 337.
Specifically, the Commission has found
the following respondents in violation:
Precision Measurement International
LLC of Westland, Michigan; Sino
Legend (Zhangjiagang) Chemical Co.,
Ltd. of Zhangjiagang City, China; Sino
Legend Holding Group, Inc. of Kowloon,
Hong Kong; Sino Legend Holding Group
Ltd. of Hong Kong; Red Avenue
Chemical Co. Ltd. of Shanghai, China;
Shanghai Lunsai International Trading
Company of Shanghai City, China; Red
Avenue Group Limited of Kowloon,
Hong Kong; and Sino Legend Holding
Group Inc. of Majuro, Marshall Islands.
After considering the submissions of the
parties on remedy, the public interest,
and bonding, the Commission has
determined to issue a limited exclusion
order for a period of ten (10) years
prohibiting the unlicensed importation
of rubber resins made using any of the
SP–1068 Rubber Resin Trade Secrets
that are manufactured by, for, or on
behalf of violating respondents or any of
their affiliated companies, parents,
subsidiaries, licensees, contractors, or
other related business entities, or their
successors or assigns. The Commission
has determined that the public interest
factors of 19 U.S.C. 1337(d) do not
preclude the issuance of a remedy. The
Commission has further determined that
the covered products may be imported
during the period of Presidential review
pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337(j) under
bond in the amount of 19% of entered
value.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Dated: January 15, 2014.
By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014–01109 Filed 1–21–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:00 Jan 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed
Consent Decree Under the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act
On January 10, 2014, the Department
of Justice lodged a proposed consent
decree with the United States District
Court for the District of Minnesota in
the lawsuit entitled United States v.
U.S. Borax Inc., Civil Action No. 0:14–
cv–00118–DSD.
The proposed consent decree fully
resolves claims of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
(‘‘EPA’’) against U.S. Borax Inc.
(‘‘Borax’’) for response costs, civil
penalties, and potential treble damages
under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
(‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9601–9675, with
respect to the South Minneapolis
Residential Soil Contamination
Superfund Site (‘‘Site) in Minneapolis,
Minnesota. A complaint, which was
filed at the same time that the United
States lodged the proposed consent
decree, alleges that Borax was an
operator of the Site during the period of
disposal of hazardous substances and,
as such, is liable for response costs
under Section107(a) of CERCLA, 42
U.S.C. 9607(a). Further, the complaint
alleges that Borax is liable for civil
penalties and damages under Sections
106(b) and 107(c)(3) of CERCLA, 32
U.S.C. 9606(b), 9607(c)(3), because it
failed to comply with a unilateral
administrative order issued by EPA to
undertake response actions at the Site.
Under the proposed consent decree,
Borax shall make a lump sum payment
of $1,225,000 to EPA as reimbursement
of response costs, and it shall make a
lump sum payment of $25,000 for civil
penalties and damages. Both payments
shall be made to the United States
within 30 days of entry of the Consent
Decree.
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment on the
proposed consent decree. Comments
should be addressed to the Assistant
Attorney General, Environment and
Natural Resources Division, and should
refer to United States v. U.S. Borax Inc.,
D.J. Ref. No. 90–11–3–09719/3. All
comments must be submitted no later
than thirty (30) days after the
publication date of this notice.
Comments may be submitted either by
email or by mail:
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
To
submit
comments:
3625
Send them to:
By
email.
By mail
pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov.
Assistant Attorney General,
U.S. DOJ—ENRD,
P.O. Box 7611,
Washington, D.C. 20044–7611.
During the public comment period,
the proposed consent decree may be
examined and downloaded at this
Justice Department Web site: https://
www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_
Decrees.html. We will also provide a
paper copy of the proposed consent
decree upon written request and
payment of reproduction costs. Please
mail your request and payment to:
Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ—
ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044–7611.
Please enclose a check or money order
for $7.5 (30 pages at 25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the United
States Treasury.
Maureen Katz,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2014–01129 Filed 1–21–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
Roderick Lee Mitchell, M.D.; Decision
and Order
On June 10, 2013, the Deputy
Assistant Administrator, Office of
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration, issued an Order to
Show Cause to Roderick Mitchell, M.D.
(Respondent), of Daingerfield, Texas.
The Show Cause Order proposed the
revocation of Respondent’s DEA
Certificate of Registration AM1375179,
which authorizes him to dispense
controlled substances in schedules II
through V as a practitioner, and the
denial of any pending applications to
renew or modify his registration, on the
ground that he ‘‘do[es] not have
authority to handle controlled
substances in the State of Texas,’’ the
State in which he is registered with
DEA. Show Cause Order, at 1 (citing 21
U.S.C. 824(a)(3)).
As the factual basis for the action, the
Show Cause Order alleged that on
November 30, 2012, ‘‘[t]he Texas
Medical Board issued a [f]inal [o]rder
. . . which immediately revoked
[Respondent’s] license to practice
E:\FR\FM\22JAN1.SGM
22JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 14 (Wednesday, January 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3624-3625]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-01109]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-Ta-849]
Certain Rubber Resins and Processes for Manufacturing Same;
Commission Determination To Affirm-in-Part and Reverse-in-Part the
Final Initial Determination of the Administrative Law Judge and To
Terminate the Investigation With a Finding of Violation With Respect to
Certain Respondents; Issuance of Limited Exclusion Order
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to affirm-in-part and reverse-in-part the
final initial determination (``final ID'') of the administrative law
judge (``ALJ'') in the above-identified investigation and to terminate
the investigation with a finding of violation with respect to certain
respondents. The Commission has issued a limited exclusion order.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James A. Worth, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-3065. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-
1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on June 26, 2012, based on a complaint filed on behalf of SI Group,
Inc. of Schenectady, New York (``SI Group'') on May 21, 2012, as
supplemented on June 12, 2012. 77 FR 38083-84 (June 26, 2012). The
complaint alleged violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (``Section 337''), in the sale for
importation, importation, or sale after importation into the United
States of certain rubber resins by reason of misappropriation of trade
secrets, the threat or effect of which is to destroy or substantially
injure an industry in the United States. The Commission's notice of
investigation named as respondents Red Avenue Chemical Corp. of America
of Rochester, New York; Thomas R. Crumlish, Jr. of Rochester, New York;
Precision Measurement International LLC of Westland, Michigan; Sino
Legend (Zhangjiagang) Chemical Co., Ltd. of Zhangjiagang City, China;
Sino Legend Holding Group, Inc. c/o Mr. Richard A. Peters of Kowloon,
Hong Kong; Sino Legend Holding Group Ltd. of Hong Kong; HongKong Sino
Legend Group, Ltd. of North Point, Hong Kong; Red Avenue Chemical Co.
Ltd. of Shanghai, China; Ning Zhang of North Vancouver, Canada; Quanhai
Yang of Beijing, China; and Shanghai Lunsai International Trading
Company of Shanghai City, China. A Commission investigative attorney
participated in this investigation.
On January 14, 2013, the Commission issued notice of its
determination not to review an ID to amend the complaint and notice of
investigation to add Red Avenue Group Limited of Kowloon, Hong Kong;
Sino Legend Holding Group Inc. of Majuro, Marshall Islands; Gold
Dynasty Limited c/o ATC Trustees (Cayman) Limited of Grand Cayman,
Cayman Islands; Elite Holding Group Inc. c/o Morgan & Morgan Trust
Corporation (Belize) Limited of Belize City, Belize as respondents. 78
FR 3817-18 (January 17, 2013).
On June 17, 2013, the presiding ALJ issued his final ID, finding a
violation of Section 337. On July 1, 2013, SI and the Respondents filed
petitions for review. On July 9, 2013, SI, the Respondents, and the
Commission investigative attorney filed responses thereto. On July 16,
2013, Respondents filed a notice of new authority. On July 24, 2013,
the Complainant submitted an objection to the notice of new authority.
The following parties and members of the public have submitted
statements on the public interest: the Complainant (July 17, 2013); the
New York State Chemical Alliance (August 14, 2013); and the American
Chemistry Council (August 14, 2013).
On September 9, 2013, the Commission issued notice of its
determination to review the final ID in its entirety and to solicit
briefing on the issues on review and on remedy, the public interest,
and bonding. 78 FR 56734-36 (Sept. 13, 2013). On September 23, 2013,
each of the parties filed a written submission, and on September 30,
2013, each of the parties filed a reply submission.
[[Page 3625]]
After considering the written submissions on review and the record
in this investigation, the Commission has determined to affirm-in-part
and reverse-in-part the final ID of the ALJ and to terminate the
investigation with a finding of violation of Section 337. Specifically,
the Commission has found the following respondents in violation:
Precision Measurement International LLC of Westland, Michigan; Sino
Legend (Zhangjiagang) Chemical Co., Ltd. of Zhangjiagang City, China;
Sino Legend Holding Group, Inc. of Kowloon, Hong Kong; Sino Legend
Holding Group Ltd. of Hong Kong; Red Avenue Chemical Co. Ltd. of
Shanghai, China; Shanghai Lunsai International Trading Company of
Shanghai City, China; Red Avenue Group Limited of Kowloon, Hong Kong;
and Sino Legend Holding Group Inc. of Majuro, Marshall Islands. After
considering the submissions of the parties on remedy, the public
interest, and bonding, the Commission has determined to issue a limited
exclusion order for a period of ten (10) years prohibiting the
unlicensed importation of rubber resins made using any of the SP-1068
Rubber Resin Trade Secrets that are manufactured by, for, or on behalf
of violating respondents or any of their affiliated companies, parents,
subsidiaries, licensees, contractors, or other related business
entities, or their successors or assigns. The Commission has determined
that the public interest factors of 19 U.S.C. 1337(d) do not preclude
the issuance of a remedy. The Commission has further determined that
the covered products may be imported during the period of Presidential
review pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337(j) under bond in the amount of 19% of
entered value.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
Dated: January 15, 2014.
By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014-01109 Filed 1-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P