Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change To Establish the Minimum Financial Requirements for the Existing Membership Category of Registered Investment Company Netting Members in the Government Securities Division, 2735-2736 [2014-00576]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2014 / Notices
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 11 and paragraph (f) of Rule
19b–4 12 thereunder. At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NASDAQ–2013–166 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NASDAQ–2013–166. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
11 15
12 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:04 Jan 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
offices of NASDAQ. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NASDAQ–2013–166, and should be
submitted on or before February 5, 2014.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.13
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–00584 Filed 1–14–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–71265; File No. SR–FICC–
2013–10]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed
Income Clearing Corporation; Order
Approving Proposed Rule Change To
Establish the Minimum Financial
Requirements for the Existing
Membership Category of Registered
Investment Company Netting Members
in the Government Securities Division
January 9, 2014.
I. Introduction
On November 12, 2013, the Fixed
Income Clearing Corporation (‘‘FICC’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) proposed
rule change SR–FICC–2013–10 pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder.2 The proposed rule
change was published for comment in
the Federal Register on November 29,
2013.3 The Commission received one
comment letter in response to the
proposed rule change.4 For the reasons
discussed below, the Commission is
approving the proposed rule change.
II. Description
The purpose of this rule filing is to
amend the Rulebook (‘‘Rules’’) of the
Government Securities Division
(‘‘GSD’’) of FICC to establish the
13 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70925
(Nov. 22, 2013), 78 FR 71702 (Nov. 29, 2013) (SR–
FICC–2013–09).
4 Letter from Peter Nowicki (December 5, 2013)
(expressing general support for allowing Registered
Investment Companies to participate in netting and
clearing).
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2735
minimum financial requirements for the
existing membership category of
Registered Investment Company Netting
Members (‘‘RIC’’).5 Historically, the GSD
has served the ‘‘sell-side’’ community
(which primarily consists of entities
such as banks and broker-dealers). FICC
believes the participation of RICs as
guaranteed service members will
contribute to the safety, efficiency, and
transparency of the market by allowing
FICC to capture a greater part of the
activity of its existing members and by
introducing activity of current nonmembers to FICC. FICC also believes
that RICs will benefit from the GSD
netting service and the associated
operational efficiencies of a central
counterparty service. RICs will not be
permitted to use the GCF Repo® service.
Currently, RICs are already a
permitted category in the GSD Rules;
the rule as amended establishes
minimum financial requirements for
RICs.6 Specifically, Rule 2A (‘‘Initial
Membership Requirements’’) of the GSD
Rules provides that the minimum
financial requirement for RICs is $100
million in net asset value.
Currently, GSD Rule 3, ‘‘Ongoing
Membership Requirements,’’ permits
GSD to assess a premium against a
netting member whose Clearing Fund
requirement exceeds its specified
regulatory capital figure.7 Pursuant to
this rule change, GSD will now be
permitted to assess RICs in the same
manner as other members.
Pursuant to GSD Rules, Tier One
Netting Members are subject to potential
loss mutualization and Tier Two Netting
Members are not. Pursuant to this rule
change, RICs will be Tier Two Netting
5 Pursuant to GSD Rule 1, the term ‘‘Registered
Investment Company Netting Member’’ is an
Investment Company (1) that is registered with the
Commission, (2) admitted to membership in GSD’s
Netting System pursuant to the GSD Rules, and (3)
whose membership in the Netting System has not
been terminated.
6 The membership requirements for RICs will be
the same as those already in place for RICs at FICC’s
Mortgage-Backed Securities Division (‘‘MBSD’’).
7 By way of example, under GSD Rule 4, if a
member has a Clearing Fund requirement of $11.4
million and excess net capital of $10 million, its
‘‘ratio’’ is 1.14 (or 114 percent), and the applicable
collateral premium would be 114 percent of $1.4
million (which is equal to the amount by which the
member’s Clearing Fund requirement exceeds its
excess net capital), or $1,596,000. The current GSD
Rules provide that FICC has the right to: (i) Apply
a lesser collateral premium (including no premium)
based on specific circumstances (such as a member
being subject to an unexpected haircut or capital
charge that does not fundamentally change its risk
profile), and (ii) return all or a portion of the
collateral premium amount if it believes that the
member’s risk profile does not require the
maintenance of that amount.
E:\FR\FM\15JAN1.SGM
15JAN1
2736
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2014 / Notices
Members because they are not permitted
by law to mutualize loss.8
Under FICC’s current loss allocation
methodology, any loss allocation is first
made against the retained earnings of
FICC attributable to the GSD (after
application of the defaulting member’s
Clearing Fund, funds-only settlement
amounts and any other collateral on
deposit with the GSD and any funds
from any cross-margining or crossguaranty agreements), in an amount up
to 25 percent of FICC’s retained earnings
or such higher amount as may be
approved by the Board of Directors of
FICC.9 If a loss still remains, the GSD
will divide the loss between the Tier
One Netting Members and the Tier Two
Netting Members. Tier One Netting
Members will be allocated the loss
applicable to them first by assessing the
Clearing Fund deposit of each such
member in the amount of up to $50,000,
equally. If a loss still remains, Tier One
Netting Members will be assessed
ratably, in accordance with the
respective amounts of their Required
Fund Deposits, based on the average
daily amount of the member’s Required
Fund Deposit over the prior twelve
months. Applicable Tier Two Netting
Members will be assigned the Tier Two
loss amount using a loss allocation
methodology based on the activity that
the Tier Two Netting Member
conducted with the defaulting
member.10
FICC is also amending GSD’s rules to
state explicitly that GSD will make its
services available to Persons 11 in other
categories as FICC may determine,
subject to the approval of the
Commission. A parallel provision is
already contained in MBSD’s rules.12
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
III. Discussion
Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act 13
directs the Commission to approve a
self-regulatory organization’s proposed
rule change if the Commission finds that
such proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder
8 Tier One Members include banks, dealers,
futures commission merchants, government
securities issuers and registered clearing agencies
and Tier Two Members include RICs. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 63986 (Feb. 28, 2011), 76
FR 12144 (Mar. 4, 2011) (SR–FICC–2010–09).
9 See GSD Rule 4.
10 GSD Rule 4, Section 7 pertains to the
satisfaction of any loss incurred by FICC as a result
of the failure of a defaulting member to fulfill its
obligations to FICC. MBSD Rule 4 contains the same
loss allocation methodology.
11 Pursuant to GSD Rule 1, the term ‘‘Person’’
means a partnership, corporation, limited liability
corporation or other organization, entity, or
individual.
12 See MBSD Rule 2A, Section 1.
13 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:04 Jan 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
applicable to such organization. Section
17A(b)(3)(B) 14 states that a clearing
agency shall not be registered unless the
Commission determines that the rules of
the clearing agency provide that certain
categories of parties may become
participants, subject to certain
provisions governing denials of
participation. RICs are one of the listed
categories of participants deemed
appropriate to the development of a
national system for the prompt and
accurate clearance and settlement of
securities transactions.15 Moreover,
Section 17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act 16
requires, among other things, that the
rules of a clearing agency registered
with the Commission be designed to
promote the prompt and accurate
clearance and settlement of securities
transactions and, in general to protect
investors and the public interest.
The Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 17A(b)(3)(B) and (F) of the
Act.17 The proposal establishes
minimum financial requirements for
RICs, thus extending GSD membership
to participants in a category enumerated
by Section 17A(b)(3)(B). Furthermore, it
promotes the prompt and accurate
clearance and settlement of securities
transactions and protects investors and
the public interest by allowing FICC to
clear a greater market share of activity
of its existing members and nonmembers. 18
IV. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the
Commission concludes that the
proposal is consistent with the
requirements of the Act, particularly the
requirements of Section 17A of the
Act,19 and the rules and regulations
thereunder.
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,20 that the
proposed rule change (File No. SR–
FICC–2013–10) be and hereby is
approved.21
14 15
U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(B).
Id.
16 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(F).
17 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(B) and (F).
18 This Order addresses whether the proposed
rule change is consistent with the Act. As such, this
Order does not address any relief that may be
necessary under the Investment Company Act of
1940 for an individual RIC to participate as a
Registered Investment Company Netting Member as
defined by GSD Rule 1. See footnote 5, supra.
19 15 U.S.C. 78q–1.
20 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
21 In approving the proposed rule change, the
Commission considered the proposal’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
15 See
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
For the Commission by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant todelegated
authority.22
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–00576 Filed 1–14–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–71271; File No. SR–
NYSEArca–2013–122]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Designation of a
Longer Period for Commission Action
on Proposed Rule Change Relating to
the Use of Derivative Instruments by
PIMCO Total Return Exchange Traded
Fund
January 9, 2014.
On November 6, 2013, NYSE Arca,
Inc. filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a
proposed rule change relating to the use
of derivative instruments by the PIMCO
Total Return Exchange Traded Fund
(‘‘Fund’’). The proposed rule change
was published for comment in the
Federal Register on November 26,
2013.3 The Commission received no
comment letters on the proposed rule
change.
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 4 provides
that, within 45 days of the publication
of notice of the filing of a proposed rule
change, or within such longer period up
to 90 days as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period
to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or as to which the
self-regulatory organization consents,
the Commission shall either approve the
proposed rule change, disapprove the
proposed rule change, or institute
proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule change should be
disapproved. The Commission is
extending this 45-day time period.
The Commission finds that it is
appropriate to designate a longer period
within which to take action on the
proposed rule change so that it has
sufficient time to consider the proposed
rule change. The proposed rule change
would, among other things, permit the
continued listing and trading of shares
22 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70905
(November 20, 2013), 78 FR 70610.
4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
1 15
E:\FR\FM\15JAN1.SGM
15JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 10 (Wednesday, January 15, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2735-2736]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-00576]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-71265; File No. SR-FICC-2013-10]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation;
Order Approving Proposed Rule Change To Establish the Minimum Financial
Requirements for the Existing Membership Category of Registered
Investment Company Netting Members in the Government Securities
Division
January 9, 2014.
I. Introduction
On November 12, 2013, the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation
(``FICC'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') proposed rule change SR-FICC-2013-10 pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\2\ The proposed rule change was published
for comment in the Federal Register on November 29, 2013.\3\ The
Commission received one comment letter in response to the proposed rule
change.\4\ For the reasons discussed below, the Commission is approving
the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70925 (Nov. 22, 2013),
78 FR 71702 (Nov. 29, 2013) (SR-FICC-2013-09).
\4\ Letter from Peter Nowicki (December 5, 2013) (expressing
general support for allowing Registered Investment Companies to
participate in netting and clearing).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description
The purpose of this rule filing is to amend the Rulebook
(``Rules'') of the Government Securities Division (``GSD'') of FICC to
establish the minimum financial requirements for the existing
membership category of Registered Investment Company Netting Members
(``RIC'').\5\ Historically, the GSD has served the ``sell-side''
community (which primarily consists of entities such as banks and
broker-dealers). FICC believes the participation of RICs as guaranteed
service members will contribute to the safety, efficiency, and
transparency of the market by allowing FICC to capture a greater part
of the activity of its existing members and by introducing activity of
current non-members to FICC. FICC also believes that RICs will benefit
from the GSD netting service and the associated operational
efficiencies of a central counterparty service. RICs will not be
permitted to use the GCF Repo[supreg] service.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Pursuant to GSD Rule 1, the term ``Registered Investment
Company Netting Member'' is an Investment Company (1) that is
registered with the Commission, (2) admitted to membership in GSD's
Netting System pursuant to the GSD Rules, and (3) whose membership
in the Netting System has not been terminated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently, RICs are already a permitted category in the GSD Rules;
the rule as amended establishes minimum financial requirements for
RICs.\6\ Specifically, Rule 2A (``Initial Membership Requirements'') of
the GSD Rules provides that the minimum financial requirement for RICs
is $100 million in net asset value.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The membership requirements for RICs will be the same as
those already in place for RICs at FICC's Mortgage-Backed Securities
Division (``MBSD'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently, GSD Rule 3, ``Ongoing Membership Requirements,'' permits
GSD to assess a premium against a netting member whose Clearing Fund
requirement exceeds its specified regulatory capital figure.\7\
Pursuant to this rule change, GSD will now be permitted to assess RICs
in the same manner as other members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ By way of example, under GSD Rule 4, if a member has a
Clearing Fund requirement of $11.4 million and excess net capital of
$10 million, its ``ratio'' is 1.14 (or 114 percent), and the
applicable collateral premium would be 114 percent of $1.4 million
(which is equal to the amount by which the member's Clearing Fund
requirement exceeds its excess net capital), or $1,596,000. The
current GSD Rules provide that FICC has the right to: (i) Apply a
lesser collateral premium (including no premium) based on specific
circumstances (such as a member being subject to an unexpected
haircut or capital charge that does not fundamentally change its
risk profile), and (ii) return all or a portion of the collateral
premium amount if it believes that the member's risk profile does
not require the maintenance of that amount.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to GSD Rules, Tier One Netting Members are subject to
potential loss mutualization and Tier Two Netting Members are not.
Pursuant to this rule change, RICs will be Tier Two Netting
[[Page 2736]]
Members because they are not permitted by law to mutualize loss.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Tier One Members include banks, dealers, futures commission
merchants, government securities issuers and registered clearing
agencies and Tier Two Members include RICs. See Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 63986 (Feb. 28, 2011), 76 FR 12144 (Mar. 4, 2011)
(SR-FICC-2010-09).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under FICC's current loss allocation methodology, any loss
allocation is first made against the retained earnings of FICC
attributable to the GSD (after application of the defaulting member's
Clearing Fund, funds-only settlement amounts and any other collateral
on deposit with the GSD and any funds from any cross-margining or
cross-guaranty agreements), in an amount up to 25 percent of FICC's
retained earnings or such higher amount as may be approved by the Board
of Directors of FICC.\9\ If a loss still remains, the GSD will divide
the loss between the Tier One Netting Members and the Tier Two Netting
Members. Tier One Netting Members will be allocated the loss applicable
to them first by assessing the Clearing Fund deposit of each such
member in the amount of up to $50,000, equally. If a loss still
remains, Tier One Netting Members will be assessed ratably, in
accordance with the respective amounts of their Required Fund Deposits,
based on the average daily amount of the member's Required Fund Deposit
over the prior twelve months. Applicable Tier Two Netting Members will
be assigned the Tier Two loss amount using a loss allocation
methodology based on the activity that the Tier Two Netting Member
conducted with the defaulting member.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See GSD Rule 4.
\10\ GSD Rule 4, Section 7 pertains to the satisfaction of any
loss incurred by FICC as a result of the failure of a defaulting
member to fulfill its obligations to FICC. MBSD Rule 4 contains the
same loss allocation methodology.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FICC is also amending GSD's rules to state explicitly that GSD will
make its services available to Persons \11\ in other categories as FICC
may determine, subject to the approval of the Commission. A parallel
provision is already contained in MBSD's rules.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Pursuant to GSD Rule 1, the term ``Person'' means a
partnership, corporation, limited liability corporation or other
organization, entity, or individual.
\12\ See MBSD Rule 2A, Section 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Discussion
Section 19(b)(2)(C) of the Act \13\ directs the Commission to
approve a self-regulatory organization's proposed rule change if the
Commission finds that such proposed rule change is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to such organization. Section 17A(b)(3)(B) \14\ states that
a clearing agency shall not be registered unless the Commission
determines that the rules of the clearing agency provide that certain
categories of parties may become participants, subject to certain
provisions governing denials of participation. RICs are one of the
listed categories of participants deemed appropriate to the development
of a national system for the prompt and accurate clearance and
settlement of securities transactions.\15\ Moreover, Section
17A(b)(3)(F) of the Act \16\ requires, among other things, that the
rules of a clearing agency registered with the Commission be designed
to promote the prompt and accurate clearance and settlement of
securities transactions and, in general to protect investors and the
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(C).
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(B).
\15\ See Id.
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 17A(b)(3)(B) and (F) of the Act.\17\ The proposal
establishes minimum financial requirements for RICs, thus extending GSD
membership to participants in a category enumerated by Section
17A(b)(3)(B). Furthermore, it promotes the prompt and accurate
clearance and settlement of securities transactions and protects
investors and the public interest by allowing FICC to clear a greater
market share of activity of its existing members and non-members. \18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(B) and (F).
\18\ This Order addresses whether the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Act. As such, this Order does not address any
relief that may be necessary under the Investment Company Act of
1940 for an individual RIC to participate as a Registered Investment
Company Netting Member as defined by GSD Rule 1. See footnote 5,
supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Conclusion
On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission concludes that the
proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Act, particularly
the requirements of Section 17A of the Act,\19\ and the rules and
regulations thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 15 U.S.C. 78q-1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\20\ that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-FICC-2013-10) be
and hereby is approved.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
\21\ In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission
considered the proposal's impact on efficiency, competition, and
capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
For the Commission by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant todelegated authority.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-00576 Filed 1-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P