Certain Acousto-Magnetic Electronic Article Surveillance Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Institution of Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337, 2692-2693 [2014-00566]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
2692
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2014 / Notices
telephone 505–462–3560; email at
rgraham@usbr.gov. Individuals who use
a telecommunications device for the
deaf may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
to contact Ms. Graham during normal
business hours. The FIRS is available 24
hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a
message or question with Ms. Graham.
You will receive a reply during normal
business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to the National Environmental Policy
Act, Reclamation will serve as the lead
federal agency for preparation of the EIS
on the continued implementation of the
Operating Agreement for the Rio Grande
Project, New Mexico and Texas. The
responsible official for this action is
Reclamation’s Upper Colorado Regional
Director.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Background
The Rio Grande Project includes
Elephant Butte and Caballo dams and
reservoirs, a power generating plant,
and five diversion dams (Percha,
Leasburg, Mesilla, American, and
International) located on the Rio Grande
in New Mexico and Texas. The Rio
Grande Project was authorized by
Congress under the authority of the
Reclamation Act of 1902 and the Rio
Grande Project Act of February 25, 1905.
The Rio Grande Project Operating
Agreement was signed in 2008 to
allocate Rio Grande Project water,
which includes water stored in Elephant
Butte and Caballo reservoirs and return
flows to the Rio Grande between the
EBID in the Rincon and Mesilla valleys
of New Mexico and the EPCWID in the
Mesilla and El Paso valleys of Texas and
Mexico. The Rio Grande Project also
provides water to Mexico under the
1906 international treaty. Rio Grande
Project water is provided by
Reclamation to irrigate a variety of crops
and for municipal and industrial water
uses.
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose and need for action is to
meet contractual obligations to EBID
and EPCWID to implement a written set
of criteria and procedures for allocating,
delivering, and accounting for Rio
Grande Project water to both districts
consistent with their rights under
applicable law each year in compliance
with various court decrees, settlement
agreements, and contracts. These
include the 2008 Compromise and
Settlement Agreement among
Reclamation, EBID, and EPCWID, and
contracts between the United States and
the EBID and EPCWID. The purpose and
need of an ancillary but potentially
similar action is to implement the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:04 Jan 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
provisions of the Act of December 29,
1981, to allow the storage of San JuanChama project water acquired by
contract with the Secretary of the
Interior pursuant to Public Law 87–483
in Elephant Butte Reservoir.
Proposed Action
The proposed federal action is to
continue to implement the 2008
Operating Agreement for the Rio Grande
Project over the remaining term
(through 2050), and a potentially similar
action under 40 CFR 1508.25, to
implement long-term contracts for
storage of San Juan-Chama water in the
Rio Grande Project.
personal identifying information in your
comment, please be advised that your
entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: November 5, 2013.
Brent Rhees,
Deputy Regional Director—Upper Colorado
Region, Bureau of Reclamation.
[FR Doc. 2014–00476 Filed 1–14–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P
Scoping Process
This notice initiates the scoping
process which guides the development
of the EIS. To ensure that the full range
of issues related to this proposed action
are addressed and all significant issues
identified, comments and suggestions
are invited from all interested parties.
Comments or questions concerning this
proposed action and the EIS should be
directed to Reclamation using the
contact information provided above. To
be most effective, written comments
should be received prior to the close of
the comment period and should clearly
articulate the commentor’s concerns.
Dates and Addresses of Public Scoping
Meetings
The scoping meeting dates and
addresses are:
• Thursday, January 30, 2014, 3:00 p.m.
to 5:00 p.m., Bureau of Reclamation,
Albuquerque Area Office, 555
Broadway NE., Suite 100,
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102
• Friday, January 31, 2014, 6:00 p.m. to
8:00 p.m., Elephant Butte Irrigation
District, 530 South Melendres Street,
Las Cruces, New Mexico 88005
• Saturday, February 1, 2014, 9:00 a.m.
to 11:00 a.m., Bureau of Reclamation,
El Paso Field Division, 10737
Gateway West, Suite 350, El Paso,
Texas 79935
Special Assistance for Public Scoping
Meetings
If special assistance is required at the
scoping meetings, please contact Ms.
Graham at 505–462–3560 or email at
rgraham@usbr.gov. Please notify Ms.
Graham at least two weeks in advance
of the meeting to enable Reclamation to
secure the needed services. If a request
cannot be honored, the requestor will be
notified.
Public Disclosure
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–904]
Certain Acousto-Magnetic Electronic
Article Surveillance Systems,
Components Thereof, and Products
Containing Same; Institution of
Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
1337
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
December 11, 2013, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Tyco Fire &
Security GmbH of Switzerland;
Sensormatic Electronics, LLC of Boca
Raton, Florida; and Tyco Integrated
Security, LLC of Boca Raton, Florida. A
letter supplementing the complaint was
filed on December 23, 2013. The
complaint alleges violations of section
337 based upon the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain acoustomagnetic electronic article surveillance
systems, components thereof, and
products containing same by reason of
infringement of U.S. Patent No.
5,729,200 (‘‘the ‘200 patent’’) and U.S.
Patent No. 6,181,245 (‘‘the ‘245 patent’’).
The complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337.
The complainants request that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
general exclusion order and cease and
desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15JAN1.SGM
15JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 15, 2014 / Notices
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record
for this investigation may be viewed on
the Commission’s electronic docket
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2013).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
January 9, 2014, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain acousto-magnetic
electronic article surveillance systems,
components thereof, and products
containing same by reason of
infringement of one or more of claims
1–4, 6, 7, and 20–25 of the ‘200 patent
and claims 1–5 of the ‘245 patent, and
whether an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainants are:
Tyco Fire & Security GmbH, Victor von
Bruns Strasse 21, Neuhausen am
Rheinfall 8212, Switzerland;
Sensormatic Electronics, LLC, 6600
Congress Avenue, Boca Raton, FL
33487;
Tyco Integrated Security, LLC, 1501
Yamato Road, Boca Raton, Florida
33487.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:04 Jan 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Ningbo Signatronic Technologies, Ltd.,
505 MingZhou Road (West), BeiLun
District, Ningbo, China 315800;
All-Tag Security Americas, Inc., 1155
Broken Sound Parkway, NW., Unit E,
Arvida Park of Commerce, Boca
Raton, FL 33487;
All-Tag Security Hong Kong Co., Ltd.,
Unit 1211, 12/F, Tsuen Wan
Industrial Centre, 220–248 Texaco
Road, Tsuen Wan N.T., Hong Kong;
´
All-Tag Europe SPRL, Chaussee
d’Alsemberg, 999 Boite 14, 1180
Brussels, Belgium;
All-Tag Security UK, Ltd., Unit 3
Bamford Business Park, Hibbert
Street, Stockport SK4 1PL Cheshire,
United Kingdom;
Best Security Industries, 755 NW 17th
Avenue Suite 101, Delray Beach, FL
33445;
Signatronic Corporation, 1155 Broken
Sound Parkway NW Unit E, Boca
Raton, FL 33487.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2693
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: January 9, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014–00566 Filed 1–14–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1207–1209
(Final)]
Prestressed Concrete Steel Rail Tie
Wire From China, Mexico, and
Thailand; Scheduling of the Final
Phase of Antidumping Duty
Investigations
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Commission hereby gives
notice of the scheduling of the final
phase of antidumping duty investigation
Nos. 731–TA–1207–1209 (Final) under
section 731(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930
(19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)) (the Act) to
determine whether an industry in the
United States is materially injured or
threatened with material injury, or the
establishment of an industry in the
United States is materially retarded, by
reason of less-than-fair-value imports of
prestressed concrete steel rail tie wire
from China, Mexico, and Thailand,
provided for in subheading 7217.10.80
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States.1
For further information concerning
the conduct of this phase of the
investigations, hearing procedures, and
rules of general application, consult the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A through
E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A and C (19 CFR part 207).
DATES: Effective Date: December 12,
2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Angela M. W. Newell (202–708–5409),
Office of Investigations, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436.
SUMMARY:
1 For purposes of these investigations, the
Department of Commerce has defined the subject
merchandise as ‘‘PC tie wire’’—high carbon steel
wire; stress relieved or low relaxation; indented or
otherwise deformed; meeting at a minimum the
physical, mechanical, and chemical requirements of
the American Society of Testing Materials
(‘‘ASTM’’) A881/A881M specification; regardless of
shape, size or alloy element levels; suitable for use
as prestressed tendons in concrete railroad ties.
High carbon steel is defined as steel that contains
0.6 percent or more of carbon by weight.
E:\FR\FM\15JAN1.SGM
15JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 10 (Wednesday, January 15, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2692-2693]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-00566]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-904]
Certain Acousto-Magnetic Electronic Article Surveillance Systems,
Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Institution of
Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on December 11, 2013, under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of
Tyco Fire & Security GmbH of Switzerland; Sensormatic Electronics, LLC
of Boca Raton, Florida; and Tyco Integrated Security, LLC of Boca
Raton, Florida. A letter supplementing the complaint was filed on
December 23, 2013. The complaint alleges violations of section 337
based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of
certain acousto-magnetic electronic article surveillance systems,
components thereof, and products containing same by reason of
infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,729,200 (``the `200 patent'') and
U.S. Patent No. 6,181,245 (``the `245 patent''). The complaint further
alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complainants request that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a general exclusion
order and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection
[[Page 2693]]
during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office
of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street
SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing
impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.
Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in
gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the
Secretary at (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205-2560.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2013).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on January 9, 2014, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain acousto-
magnetic electronic article surveillance systems, components thereof,
and products containing same by reason of infringement of one or more
of claims 1-4, 6, 7, and 20-25 of the `200 patent and claims 1-5 of the
`245 patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainants are:
Tyco Fire & Security GmbH, Victor von Bruns Strasse 21, Neuhausen am
Rheinfall 8212, Switzerland;
Sensormatic Electronics, LLC, 6600 Congress Avenue, Boca Raton, FL
33487;
Tyco Integrated Security, LLC, 1501 Yamato Road, Boca Raton, Florida
33487.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
Ningbo Signatronic Technologies, Ltd., 505 MingZhou Road (West), BeiLun
District, Ningbo, China 315800;
All-Tag Security Americas, Inc., 1155 Broken Sound Parkway, NW., Unit
E, Arvida Park of Commerce, Boca Raton, FL 33487;
All-Tag Security Hong Kong Co., Ltd., Unit 1211, 12/F, Tsuen Wan
Industrial Centre, 220-248 Texaco Road, Tsuen Wan N.T., Hong Kong;
All-Tag Europe SPRL, Chauss[eacute]e d'Alsemberg, 999 Boite 14, 1180
Brussels, Belgium;
All-Tag Security UK, Ltd., Unit 3 Bamford Business Park, Hibbert
Street, Stockport SK4 1PL Cheshire, United Kingdom;
Best Security Industries, 755 NW 17th Avenue Suite 101, Delray Beach,
FL 33445;
Signatronic Corporation, 1155 Broken Sound Parkway NW Unit E, Boca
Raton, FL 33487.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436;
and
(3) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: January 9, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014-00566 Filed 1-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
