Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 1893-1896 [2014-00185]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 7 / Friday, January 10, 2014 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–82,458; TA–W–82,458A]
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
REC Silicon, Inc.; Including On-Site
Leased Workers From Express
Employment Professionals; Including
Workers Whose Unemployment
Insurance (UI) Wages Were Reported
Through REC Solar Grade Silicon LLC;
Moses Lake, Washington; REC
Advanced Silicon Materials, LLC;
Including On-Site Leased Workers
From Spherion Recruiting and Staffing
Silver Bow, Montana; Amended
Certification Regarding Eligibility To
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’),
19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor
issued a Certification of Eligibility to
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance on March 22, 2013,
applicable to workers of REC Silicon,
Inc., including on-site leased workers
from Express Employment
Professionals, and including workers
whose unemployment insurance wages
are reported through REC Solar Grade
Silicon, LLC, Moses Lake, Washington.
The Department’s notice of
determination was published in the
Federal Register on April 9, 2013 (78 FR
21153).
At the request of a company official,
the Department reviewed the
certification for workers of the subject
firm. The company reported that the
workers from REC Advanced Silicon
Materials, LLC, including on-site leased
workers from Spherion Recruiting and
Staffing, Silver Bow, Montana (TA–W–
82,458A) have been separated or
threatened with separation due to the
same conditions that led to certification
of the workers at the Moses Lake,
Washington facility. Specifically, the
worker separations at both facilities are
attributable to the acquisition from a
foreign country by the firm of articles
like or directly competitive with the
polysilicon produced by the firm.
Accordingly, the Department is
amending the certification to include
the workers of REC Advanced Silicon
Materials, LLC, including on-site leased
workers from Spherion Recruiting and
Staffing, Silver Bow, Montana (TA–W–
82,458A).
The amended notice applicable to
TA–W–82,458 is hereby issued as
follows:
‘‘All workers of REC Silicon, Inc.,
including on-site leased workers from
Express Employment Professionals, and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:40 Jan 09, 2014
Jkt 232001
including workers whose unemployment
insurance wages are reported through REC
Solar Grade Silicon, LLC, Moses Lake,
Washington (TA–W–82,458) and REC
Advanced Silicon Materials, LLC, including
on-site leased workers from Spherion
Recruiting and Staffing, Silver Bow, Montana
(TA–W–82,458A) who became totally or
partially separated from employment on or
after February 12, 2012 through March 22,
2015, and all workers in the group threatened
with total or partial separation from
employment on the date of certification
through March 22, 2015, are eligible to apply
for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of
Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as
amended.’’
Signed in Washington, DC, this 24th day of
December, 2013.
Michael W. Jaffe
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2014–00183 Filed 1–9–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19
U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers by (TA–W) number issued
during the period of December 9, 2013
through December 13, 2013.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the
following must be satisfied:
(1) a significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) the sales or production, or both, of
such firm have decreased absolutely;
and
(3) One of the following must be
satisfied:
(A) imports of articles or services like
or directly competitive with articles
produced or services supplied by such
firm have increased;
(B) imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles into which one
or more component parts produced by
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1893
such firm are directly incorporated,
have increased;
(C) imports of articles directly
incorporating one or more component
parts produced outside the United
States that are like or directly
competitive with imports of articles
incorporating one or more component
parts produced by such firm have
increased;
(D) imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are
produced directly using services
supplied by such firm, have increased;
and
(4) the increase in imports contributed
importantly to such workers’ separation
or threat of separation and to the decline
in the sales or production of such firm;
or
II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the
following must be satisfied:
(1) a significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) One of the following must be
satisfied:
(A) there has been a shift by the
workers’ firm to a foreign country in the
production of articles or supply of
services like or directly competitive
with those produced/supplied by the
workers’ firm;
(B) there has been an acquisition from
a foreign country by the workers’ firm
of articles/services that are like or
directly competitive with those
produced/supplied by the workers’ firm;
and
(3) the shift/acquisition contributed
importantly to the workers’ separation
or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in public agencies and
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(b) of the Act must be met.
(1) a significant number or proportion
of the workers in the public agency have
become totally or partially separated, or
are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
(2) the public agency has acquired
from a foreign country services like or
directly competitive with services
which are supplied by such agency; and
(3) the acquisition of services
contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected secondary workers of a firm and
a certification issued regarding
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
1894
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 7 / Friday, January 10, 2014 / Notices
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(c) of the Act must be met.
(1) a significant number or proportion
of the workers in the workers’ firm have
become totally or partially separated, or
are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
(2) the workers’ firm is a Supplier or
Downstream Producer to a firm that
employed a group of workers who
received a certification of eligibility
under Section 222(a) of the Act, and
such supply or production is related to
the article or service that was the basis
for such certification; and
(3) either—
(A) the workers’ firm is a supplier and
the component parts it supplied to the
firm described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the
production or sales of the workers’ firm;
or
(B) a loss of business by the workers’
firm with the firm described in
paragraph (2) contributed importantly to
the workers’ separation or threat of
separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in firms identified by
the International Trade Commission and
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section 222(f)
of the Act must be met.
(1) the workers’ firm is publicly
identified by name by the International
Trade Commission as a member of a
domestic industry in an investigation
resulting in—
(A) an affirmative determination of
serious injury or threat thereof under
section 202(b)(1);
(B) an affirmative determination of
market disruption or threat thereof
under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) an affirmative final determination
of material injury or threat thereof under
section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) the petition is filed during the 1year period beginning on the date on
which—
(A) a summary of the report submitted
to the President by the International
Trade Commission under section
202(f)(1) with respect to the affirmative
determination described in paragraph
(1)(A) is published in the Federal
Register under section 202(f)(3); or
(B) notice of an affirmative
determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the
Federal Register; and
(3) the workers have become totally or
partially separated from the workers’
firm within—
(A) the 1-year period described in
paragraph (2); or
(B) notwithstanding section 223(b)(1),
the 1-year period preceding the 1-year
period described in paragraph (2).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the
Trade Act have been met.
TA–W No.
Subject firm
Location
83,030 ..........
83,030A .......
83,030B .......
83,030C .......
J.R. Simplot, Food Group, BD Employment Solutions, Inc. ......................
J.R. Simplot, Food Group, BBSI and American Staffing ...........................
J.R. Simplot, Food Group, BBSI ................................................................
J.R. Simplot, Food Group, BD Employment Solutions and Gem State
Staffing.
Flotation Technologies LLC, Manpower and Bonney Staffing ...................
Keywell LLC ................................................................................................
Nampa, ID ............................
Heyburn, ID ..........................
Aberdeen, ID ........................
Caldwell, ID ..........................
August
August
August
August
Biddeford, ME ......................
West Mifflin, PA ....................
October 23, 2012.
November 20, 2012.
83,167 ..........
83,234 ..........
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or
Impact date
14,
14,
14,
14,
2012.
2012.
2012.
2012.
services) of the Trade Act have been
met.
TA–W No.
Subject firm
Location
Impact date
83,082 ..........
83,090 ..........
DST Retirement Solutions, LLC .................................................................
IBM Corporation, Global Business Services, Sector Support Specialists
Group.
Oakley Manufacturing, Oakley, Inc., Luxottica, U.S. Holdings Corporation, Alar and Aerotek.
Toho Tenax America, Inc., Alternate Staffing, Account Temps and
Randstad Staffing.
NCR ............................................................................................................
Page 1 Solutions, LLC, Website Development, Search Engine Optimization and Pay Per Click Dept..
Ruskin Company, Air Distribution Technologies, Inc., Personnel Temporary, Extras Support.
Osram Sylvania, Inc. ..................................................................................
Northeast Utilities Service Company, Information Technology Division,
IBM, Infosys, The Ergonomic Group, etc..
KCI USA, Inc., Teksystems, Modis ............................................................
KCI USA, Inc. .............................................................................................
KCI USA, Inc. .............................................................................................
Inalfa Roof Systems Grand Blanc, Inalfa Roof Systems, Inc., Aerotek
and Sentech.
Computershare Inc., Edison Call Center, Express Employment Professionals and Northpointe, etc..
Kansas City, MO ..................
Endicott, NY .........................
September 13, 2012.
September 17, 2012.
Foothill Ranch, CA ...............
September 19, 2012.
Rockwood, TN ......................
October 3, 2012.
Bentonville, AR .....................
Golden, CO ..........................
October 7, 2012.
October 28, 2012.
Fairmont, WV .......................
October 30, 2012.
Wellsboro, PA ......................
Berlin, CT .............................
October 21, 2012.
November 5, 2012.
San Antonio, TX ...................
Charlotte, NC .......................
Dillon, MT .............................
Holly, MI ...............................
November
November
November
November
Edison, NJ ............................
November 26, 2012.
83,100 ..........
83,146 ..........
83,158 ..........
83,183 ..........
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
83,186 ..........
83,192 ..........
83,199 ..........
83,210 ..........
83,210A .......
83,210B .......
83,244 ..........
83,246 ..........
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:40 Jan 09, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
7, 2012.
7, 2012.
7, 2012.
25, 2012.
1895
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 7 / Friday, January 10, 2014 / Notices
TA–W No.
Subject firm
Location
83,247 ..........
AVX Corporation, Kyocera Group Company, IHT Staffing and Huff Consulting.
AVX Corporation, Kyocera Group Company ..............................................
South Coast Networks, Working On-Site at AVX Corporation, Kyocera
Group Company.
Myrtle Beach, SC .................
February 4, 2014.
Conway, SC .........................
Myrtle Beach, SC .................
February 4, 2014.
November 20, 2012.
83,247A .......
83,247B .......
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers
are certified eligible to apply for TAA)
of the Trade Act have been met.
TA–W No.
Subject firm
Location
83,198 ..........
IPS Operations, Hewlett Packard ...............................................................
Sandston, VA .......................
Negative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the eligibility
criteria for worker adjustment assistance
have not been met for the reasons
specified.
The investigation revealed that the
criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or
TA–W No.
Subject firm
83,125 ..........
Acushnet Company ....................................................................................
The investigation revealed that the
criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A)(i)
Subject firm
Kimball Electronics, Inc., Kimball Electronics Group, Inc., Jasper Division, Spartan Staffing.
State Industries, LLC ..................................................................................
The investigation revealed that the
criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A)
83,102 ..........
83,106 ..........
Determinations Terminating
Investigations of Petitions for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
After notice of the petitions was
published in the Federal Register and
on the Department’s Web site, as
Philadelphia, PA.
Norwalk, OH.
required by Section 221 of the Act (19
U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated
investigations of these petitions.
The following determinations
terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioning groups of
83,239 ..........
Fenton Gift Shops, Inc. ..............................................................................
83,280 ..........
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Ocwen Financial Corporation ......................
16:40 Jan 09, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00077
filed earlier covering the same
petitioners.
Location
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Impact date
Williamstown, WV.
because the petitions are the subject of
ongoing investigations under petitions
Subject firm
VerDate Mar<15>2010
workers are covered by active
certifications. Consequently, further
investigation in these cases would serve
no purpose since the petitioning group
of workers cannot be covered by more
than one certification at a time.
Location
TA–W No.
Impact date
New York, NY.
Subject firm
The following determinations
terminating investigations were issued
country) of section 222 have not been
met.
Location
TA–W No.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Eugene, OR.
Subject firm
Goldman Sachs & Company, Operations Division, Asset Staffing, Control Associates/Constantin, etc..
Pearl Pressman Liberty Communications Group, Inc. ...............................
Janesville Acoustics, Jason Incorporated, Nesco LLC ..............................
Impact date
Jasper, IN.
(increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift
in production or services to a foreign
83,048 ..........
Impact date
services to a foreign country) of section
222 have not been met.
Location
TA–W No.
November 4, 2012.
New Bedford, MA.
(decline in sales or production, or both)
and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or
83,195 ..........
Impact date
(b)(1), or (c)(1) (employment decline or
threat of separation) of section 222 has
not been met.
Location
TA–W No.
83,221 ..........
Impact date
Fort Washington, PA.
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
Impact date
1896
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 7 / Friday, January 10, 2014 / Notices
I hereby certify that the
aforementioned determinations were
issued during the period of December 9,
2013 through December 13, 2013. These
determinations are available on the
Department’s Web site tradeact/taa/taa_
search_form.cfm under the searchable
listing of determinations or by calling
the Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance toll free at 888–365–6822.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 23rd day of
December 2013.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2014–00185 Filed 1–9–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND
BUDGET
Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 and (FY) 2014
List of Designated Federal Entities and
Federal Entities
Office of Management and
Budget.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
As required by Section 8G of
the Inspector General Act of 1978, as
amended (IG Act; 5 U.S.C. Appendix),
this notice provides the FY 2013 and FY
2014 list of Designated Federal Entities
and Federal Entities.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mike Wetklow, Office of Management
and Budget, Office of Federal Financial
Management, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503, (202)
395–3998.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice provides the FY 2013 and FY
2014 List of Designated Federal Entities
and Federal Entities which, under
Section 8G of the IG Act, the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) is
required to publish. This list is also
posted on the OMB Web site at https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb.
The list of the ‘‘Federal Entities’’ has
been updated to reflect: (1) The reestablishment of the Administrative
Conference of the United States in
March 2010 (ACUS had not received
funding between 1995 and 2009); (2) the
establishment of the Financial Stability
Oversight Council in Public Law 111–
203 (Section 111); (3)the establishment
of the Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration
Council in Public Law 112–141 (Section
1603); and (4) the establishment of the
Valles Caldera Trust in Public Law 106–
248.
The list of the ‘‘Designated Federal
Entities’’ has been updated to reflect the
amendments in Public Law 111–203
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:40 Jan 09, 2014
Jkt 232001
and Public Law 111–259 to Section 8G
of the IG Act. With respect to the IG
Act’s listing of ‘‘designated Federal
entities’’ in Section 8G(a)(2), Public Law
111–203 added the Bureau of Consumer
Financial Protection to the pre-existing
listing for ‘‘the Board of Governors of
the Federal Reserve System’’; and,
Public Law 111–259 added the Defense
Intelligence Agency, the National
Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, the
National Reconnaissance Office, and the
National Security Agency. In addition,
Public Law 111–203 amended Section
8G(a)(4), which is the provision of the
IG Act that defines the term ‘‘head of the
designated Federal entity.’’ As an initial
matter, Congress amended the
introductory text of Section 8G(a)(4) to
state that—in the case of boards and
commissions—‘‘the term ‘head of the
designated Federal entity’ means the
board or commission of the designated
Federal entity.’’ As a result of this
amendment, Section 8G(a)(4) sets forth
three main categories of ‘‘designated
Federal entities’’ with respect to who is
the ‘‘head’’ of the entity: the term ‘‘head
of the designated Federal entity’’ means
(1) ‘‘the board or commission of the
designated Federal entity’’; (2) ‘‘in the
event the designated Federal entity does
not have a board or commission, any
person or persons designated by statute
as the head of a designated Federal
entity’’; and (3) ‘‘if no such designation
exists, the chief policymaking officer or
board of a designated Federal entity as
identified in the list published pursuant
to subsection (h)(1) of this section,
except that . . .’’ In addition, Public
Law 111–203 amended Section 8G(a)(4)
to include six additional entity-specific
exceptions to those general rules; in
these exceptions, Congress specifies
who is the ‘‘head of the designated
Federal entity’’ for each of those
entities. The pre-existing exceptions—
for the National Science Foundation and
the United States Postal Service—are
found at subparagraphs (A) and (B), and
the six added exceptions—for the
Federal Labor Relations Authority, the
National Archives and Records
Administration, the National Credit
Union Administration, the National
Endowment for the Arts, the National
Endowment for the Humanities, and the
Peace Corps—are found at
subparagraphs (C) through (H).
The list below is divided into two
groups: Designated Federal Entities and
Federal Entities. Designated Federal
Entities are listed in the IG Act, except
for those agencies that have ceased to
exist or that have been deleted from the
list. The Designated Federal Entities are
required to establish and maintain
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Offices of Inspector General to: (1)
Conduct and supervise audits and
investigations relating to programs and
operations; (2) promote economy,
efficiency, and effectiveness of, and to
prevent and detect fraud and abuse in
such programs and operations; and (3)
provide a means of keeping the entity
head and the Congress fully and
currently informed about problems and
deficiencies relating to the
administration of such programs and
operations and the necessity for, and
progress of, corrective actions.
Section 8G(a)(1) of the IG Act defines
a ‘‘Federal entity’’ as: any Government
corporation (within the meaning of
section 103 (1) of title 5, United States
Code), any Government controlled
corporation (within the meaning of
section 103 (2) of such title), or any
other entity in the Executive Branch of
the Government, or any independent
regulatory agency, but does not include:
(1) An establishment (as defined in
section 11(2) of this Act or part of an
establishment;
(2) a designated Federal entity [as
defined in section 8G(a)(2) of the Act] or
part of a designated Federal entity;
(3) the Executive Office of the
President;
(4) the Central Intelligence Agency;
(5) the Government Accountability
Office; or
(6) any entity in the judicial or
legislative branches of the Government,
including the Administrative Office of
the United States Courts and the
Architect of the Capitol and any
activities under the direction of the
Architect of the Capitol.
Pursuant to section 8(G)(h)(2) of the
IG Act, Federal Entities are required to
report annually to each House of the
Congress and OMB on audit and
investigative activities in their
organizations.
Norman Dong,
Deputy Controller.
Herein follows the text of the FY 2013
and FY 2014 List of Designated Federal
Entities and Federal Entities.
FY 2013 and FY 2014 List of Designated
Federal Entities and Federal Entities
Section 8G of the IG Act, as amended,
requires OMB to publish a list of
designated Federal entities and Federal
entities and the head of such entities.
Designated Federal entities are required
to establish Offices of Inspector General.
Federal entities are required to report
upon annual audit and investigative
activities to each House of Congress and
the Director of the Office of
Management and Budget.
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 7 (Friday, January 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1893-1896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-00185]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment
assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of
December 9, 2013 through December 13, 2013.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied:
(1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) the sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased
absolutely; and
(3) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) imports of articles or services like or directly competitive
with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have
increased;
(B) imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are
directly incorporated, have increased;
(C) imports of articles directly incorporating one or more
component parts produced outside the United States that are like or
directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more
component parts produced by such firm have increased;
(D) imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have
increased; and
(4) the increase in imports contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the
sales or production of such firm; or
II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied:
(1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) there has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign
country in the production of articles or supply of services like or
directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm;
(B) there has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the
workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly
competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and
(3) the shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers'
separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must
be met.
(1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in the public
agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to
become totally or partially separated;
(2) the public agency has acquired from a foreign country services
like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such
agency; and
(3) the acquisition of services contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued
regarding
[[Page 1894]]
eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the
group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must be
met.
(1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in the
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) the workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a
firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of
eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or
production is related to the article or service that was the basis for
such certification; and
(3) either--
(A) the workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least
20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or
(B) a loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described
in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or
threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade
Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply
for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met.
(1) the workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the
International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an
investigation resulting in--
(A) an affirmative determination of serious injury or threat
thereof under section 202(b)(1);
(B) an affirmative determination of market disruption or threat
thereof under section 421(b)(1); or
(C) an affirmative final determination of material injury or threat
thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) the petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the
date on which--
(A) a summary of the report submitted to the President by the
International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to
the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is
published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or
(B) notice of an affirmative determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and
(3) the workers have become totally or partially separated from the
workers' firm within--
(A) the 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or
(B) notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding
the 1-year period described in paragraph (2).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been
met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
83,030............... J.R. Simplot, Food Group, BD Nampa, ID........... August 14, 2012.
Employment Solutions, Inc..
83,030A.............. J.R. Simplot, Food Group, BBSI and Heyburn, ID......... August 14, 2012.
American Staffing.
83,030B.............. J.R. Simplot, Food Group, BBSI..... Aberdeen, ID........ August 14, 2012.
83,030C.............. J.R. Simplot, Food Group, BD Caldwell, ID........ August 14, 2012.
Employment Solutions and Gem State
Staffing.
83,167............... Flotation Technologies LLC, Biddeford, ME....... October 23, 2012.
Manpower and Bonney Staffing.
83,234............... Keywell LLC........................ West Mifflin, PA.... November 20, 2012.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act
have been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
83,082............... DST Retirement Solutions, LLC...... Kansas City, MO..... September 13, 2012.
83,090............... IBM Corporation, Global Business Endicott, NY........ September 17, 2012.
Services, Sector Support
Specialists Group.
83,100............... Oakley Manufacturing, Oakley, Inc., Foothill Ranch, CA.. September 19, 2012.
Luxottica, U.S. Holdings
Corporation, Alar and Aerotek.
83,146............... Toho Tenax America, Inc., Alternate Rockwood, TN........ October 3, 2012.
Staffing, Account Temps and
Randstad Staffing.
83,158............... NCR................................ Bentonville, AR..... October 7, 2012.
83,183............... Page 1 Solutions, LLC, Website Golden, CO.......... October 28, 2012.
Development, Search Engine
Optimization and Pay Per Click
Dept..
83,186............... Ruskin Company, Air Distribution Fairmont, WV........ October 30, 2012.
Technologies, Inc., Personnel
Temporary, Extras Support.
83,192............... Osram Sylvania, Inc................ Wellsboro, PA....... October 21, 2012.
83,199............... Northeast Utilities Service Berlin, CT.......... November 5, 2012.
Company, Information Technology
Division, IBM, Infosys, The
Ergonomic Group, etc..
83,210............... KCI USA, Inc., Teksystems, Modis... San Antonio, TX..... November 7, 2012.
83,210A.............. KCI USA, Inc....................... Charlotte, NC....... November 7, 2012.
83,210B.............. KCI USA, Inc....................... Dillon, MT.......... November 7, 2012.
83,244............... Inalfa Roof Systems Grand Blanc, Holly, MI........... November 25, 2012.
Inalfa Roof Systems, Inc., Aerotek
and Sentech.
83,246............... Computershare Inc., Edison Call Edison, NJ.......... November 26, 2012.
Center, Express Employment
Professionals and Northpointe,
etc..
[[Page 1895]]
83,247............... AVX Corporation, Kyocera Group Myrtle Beach, SC.... February 4, 2014.
Company, IHT Staffing and Huff
Consulting.
83,247A.............. AVX Corporation, Kyocera Group Conway, SC.......... February 4, 2014.
Company.
83,247B.............. South Coast Networks, Working On- Myrtle Beach, SC.... November 20, 2012.
Site at AVX Corporation, Kyocera
Group Company.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible
to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
83,198............... IPS Operations, Hewlett Packard.... Sandston, VA........ November 4, 2012.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met
for the reasons specified.
The investigation revealed that the criterion under paragraph
(a)(1), or (b)(1), or (c)(1) (employment decline or threat of
separation) of section 222 has not been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
83,125............... Acushnet Company................... New Bedford, MA.....
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs
(a)(2)(A)(i) (decline in sales or production, or both) and (a)(2)(B)
(shift in production or services to a foreign country) of section 222
have not been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
83,195............... Kimball Electronics, Inc., Kimball Jasper, IN..........
Electronics Group, Inc., Jasper
Division, Spartan Staffing.
83,221............... State Industries, LLC.............. Eugene, OR..........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs
(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or
services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
83,048............... Goldman Sachs & Company, Operations New York, NY........
Division, Asset Staffing, Control
Associates/Constantin, etc..
83,102............... Pearl Pressman Liberty Philadelphia, PA....
Communications Group, Inc..
83,106............... Janesville Acoustics, Jason Norwalk, OH.........
Incorporated, Nesco LLC.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register
and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act
(19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these
petitions.
The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioning groups of workers are covered by active
certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases
would serve no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be
covered by more than one certification at a time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
83,239............... Fenton Gift Shops, Inc............. Williamstown, WV....
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the petitions are the subject of ongoing investigations under
petitions filed earlier covering the same petitioners.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
83,280............... Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Ocwen Fort Washington, PA.
Financial Corporation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 1896]]
I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued
during the period of December 9, 2013 through December 13, 2013. These
determinations are available on the Department's Web site tradeact/taa/
taa--search--form.cfm under the searchable listing of determinations or
by calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance toll free at 888-
365-6822.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 23rd day of December 2013.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2014-00185 Filed 1-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P