Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From Finland: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011-2012, 1826-1827 [2014-00173]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
1826
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 7 / Friday, January 10, 2014 / Notices
already on the record.16 In this case, we
preliminarily find that Dachan is the
successor-in-interest to Quang Ngai and,
as such, is entitled to Quang Ngai’s
cash-deposit rate with respect to entries
of subject merchandise.
Should our final results remain the
same as these preliminary results,
effective the date of publication of the
final results, we will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection to assign
entries of merchandise produced or
exported by Dachan the antidumping
duty cash-deposit rate applicable to
Quang Ngai.
Public Comment
Any interested party may request a
hearing within 14 days of publication of
this notice, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.310(c). Interested parties may
submit case briefs and/or written
comments no later than 30 days after the
date of publication of this notice.
Rebuttal briefs and rebuttals to written
comments, which must be limited to
issues raised in such briefs or
comments, may be filed not later than
5 days after the case briefs. Any hearing,
if requested, will normally be held two
days after rebuttal briefs are due, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.310(d)(1).
Parties who submit case briefs or
rebuttal briefs in this CCR are requested
to submit with each argument (1) a
statement of the issue and (2) a brief
summary of the argument with an
electronic version included. Consistent
with 19 CFR 351.216(e), we will issue
the final results of this CCR no later
than 270 days after the date on which
this review was initiated or within 45
days of publication of these preliminary
results if all parties agree to our
preliminary finding.
We are issuing and publishing this
initiation and preliminary results notice
in accordance with sections 751(b)(1)
and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.216 and 351.221(c)(3).
Dated: January 3, 2014.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2014–00194 Filed 1–9–14; 8:45 am]
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
16 See Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from
Japan: Initiation and Preliminary Results of
Changed Circumstances Review, 71 FR 14679
(March 23, 2006).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:40 Jan 09, 2014
Jkt 232001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Scope of the Order
International Trade Administration
The merchandise covered by this
order is all purified
carboxymethylcellulose (CMC).4 The
merchandise subject to this order is
classified in the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
at subheading 3912.31.00.
[A–405–803]
Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From
Finland: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2011–
2012
Enforcement and Compliance,
formerly Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On August 7, 2013, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the Preliminary
Results of the 2011–2012 administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on Purified Carboxymethylcellulose
from Finland.1 This review covers one
respondent, CP Kelco Oy and CP Kelco,
Inc. (collectively, CP Kelco). The
petitioner in this proceeding is the
Aqualon Company, a division of
Hercules Incorporated (Petitioner). For
these final results of review, we
continue to find that CP Kelco made
sales of subject merchandise to the
United States at less than normal value
(NV).
DATES: Effective Date: January 10, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tyler Weinhold or Robert James, AD/
CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Room 7850, Washington,
D.C. 20230; telephone (202) 482–1121 or
(202) 482–0649, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On August 7, 2013, the Department
published the Preliminary Results. We
invited parties to comment on the
Preliminary Results. In response, we
received a case brief from CP Kelco on
September 16, 2013.2 Petitioner filed a
rebuttal brief on September 20, 2013.3
Period of Review (POR)
The POR is July 1, 2011, through June
30, 2012.
1 See Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from
Finland: Notice of Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011–
2012, 78 FR 50028 (August 16, 2013) (Preliminary
Results), and the accompanying Decision
Memorandum (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum).
2 See case brief from CP Kelco, ‘‘Purified
Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland; Case Brief’’
(September 16, 2013) (CP Kelco’s Case Brief).
3 See rebuttal brief from Petitioner, ‘‘Purified
Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland; Rebuttal
Brief’’ (September 20, 2013) (Petitioner’s Rebuttal
Brief).
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Tolling of Deadlines
As explained in the memorandum
from the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, the
Department has exercised its discretion
to toll deadlines for the duration of the
closure of the Federal Government from
October 1, through October 16, 2013.
See Memorandum for the Record from
Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance,
‘‘Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of
the Federal Government’’ (October 18,
2013). Therefore, all deadlines in this
segment of the proceeding have been
extended by 16 days. If the new
deadline falls on a non-business day, in
accordance with the Department’s
practice, the deadline will become the
next business day. The revised deadline
for the final results of this review is now
January 2, 2014.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs by parties to this
antidumping investigation are
addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum. A list of the issues raised
is attached to this notice as Appendix I.
We have analyzed all interested party
comments and have made no changes to
the Preliminary Results for these final
results.
4 For a full description of the scope of the order,
see Memorandum from Richard Weible, Director,
Office VI, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for
the Final Results of the 2011 to 2012 Administrative
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Purified
Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland’’ (Issues and
Decision Memorandum), which is dated
concurrently with these final results and
incorporated herein by reference. The Issues and
Decision Memorandum is a public document and
is on file electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (IA
ACCESS). IA ACCESS is available to registered
users at https://iaaccess.trade.gov and in the Central
Records Unit (CRU), Room 7046 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly on the
Internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The
signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the
electronic versions of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 7 / Friday, January 10, 2014 / Notices
Final Results of Review
We determine that the following
dumping margin exists for the period
July 1, 2011, through June 30, 2012:
Manufacturer/exporter
Weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percentage)
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
CP Kelco Oy .........................
3.40
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act)
and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department
will determine, and U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries of subject merchandise in
accordance with the final results of this
review. For assessment purposes, we
calculated importer (or customer)specific assessment rates for
merchandise subject to this review.
Where appropriate, we calculated an ad
valorem rate for each importer (or
customer) by dividing the total dumping
margins for reviewed sales to that party
by the total entered values associated
with those transactions. For duty
assessment rates calculated on this
basis, we will direct CBP to assess the
resulting ad valorem rate against the
entered customs values for the subject
merchandise. Where appropriate, we
calculated a per-unit rate for each
importer (or customer) by dividing the
total dumping margins for reviewed
sales to that party by the total sales
quantity associated with those
transactions. For duty-assessment rates
calculated on this basis, we will direct
CBP to assess the resulting per-unit rate
against the entered quantity of the
subject merchandise. Where an importer
(or customer)-specific assessment rate is
de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent),
the Department will instruct CBP to
assess that importer (or customer’s)
entries of subject merchandise without
regard to antidumping duties, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
The Department intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP 15 days
after the date of publication of these
final results of review.
The Department clarified its
automatic assessment regulation on May
6, 2003. See Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). This
clarification will apply to entries of
subject merchandise during the POR
produced by the company included in
these final results of review for which
the reviewed company did not know
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:40 Jan 09, 2014
Jkt 232001
their merchandise was destined for the
United States. In such instances, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate un-reviewed
entries at the all-others rate if there is no
rate for the intermediate company
involved in the transaction.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
administrative review for all shipments
of the subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date of these final results, consistent
with section 751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) For
the company covered by this review, the
cash deposit will be the rate listed
above; (2) if the exporter is not a firm
covered in this review, but was covered
in a previous review or the original less
than fair value (LTFV) investigation, the
cash deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recent period; (3) if the exporter is
not a firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or the original LTFV
investigation, but the manufacturer is,
the cash deposit rate will be the rate
established for the most recent period
for the manufacturer of the
merchandise; and (4) if neither the
exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm
covered in this or any previous review
conducted by the Department, the cash
deposit rate will continue to be 6.65
percent, which is the all-others rate
established in the LTFV investigation.
See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order;
Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From
Finland; Mexico, the Netherlands and
Sweden, 70 FR 39734 (July 11, 2005).
These deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)
to file a certificate regarding the
reimbursement of antidumping duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant
entries during this review period.
Failure to comply with this requirement
could result in the Secretary’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of doubled
antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1827
with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary
information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification
of the return/destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: January 2, 2014.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the
Accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum
Issue: Authority To Conduct a Differential
Pricing Analysis and Apply an Alternative
Comparison Methodology
[FR Doc. 2014–00173 Filed 1–9–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–351–841]
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film,
Sheet, and Strip From Brazil: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2011–2012
Enforcement and Compliance,
formerly Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On August 16, 2013, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the Preliminary
Results of the 2011–2012 administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on Polyethylene Terephthalate Film,
Sheet, and Strip (PET film) from Brazil.1
This review covers one respondent,
Terphane Ltda., and Terphane’s U.S.
affiliate, Terphane, Inc. (collectively,
Terphane). The petitioners in this
proceeding are Mitsubishi Polyester
Film, Inc. and SKC, Inc. (collectively,
Petitioners). For these final results of
review we continue to find that
Terphane had no reviewable entries of
PET film subject to the order.
DATES: Effective Date: January 10, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tyler Weinhold or Robert James, AD/
AGENCY:
1 See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and
Strip From Brazil: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011–
2012, 78 FR 50029 (August 16, 2013) (Preliminary
Results), and accompanying Decision Memorandum
(Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
10JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 7 (Friday, January 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1826-1827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-00173]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-405-803]
Purified Carboxymethylcellulose From Finland: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011-2012
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, formerly Import Administration,
International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On August 7, 2013, the Department of Commerce (the Department)
published the Preliminary Results of the 2011-2012 administrative
review of the antidumping duty order on Purified Carboxymethylcellulose
from Finland.\1\ This review covers one respondent, CP Kelco Oy and CP
Kelco, Inc. (collectively, CP Kelco). The petitioner in this proceeding
is the Aqualon Company, a division of Hercules Incorporated
(Petitioner). For these final results of review, we continue to find
that CP Kelco made sales of subject merchandise to the United States at
less than normal value (NV).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland: Notice of
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011-
2012, 78 FR 50028 (August 16, 2013) (Preliminary Results), and the
accompanying Decision Memorandum (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: January 10, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tyler Weinhold or Robert James, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Room 7850, Washington, D.C. 20230; telephone
(202) 482-1121 or (202) 482-0649, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 7, 2013, the Department published the Preliminary
Results. We invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. In
response, we received a case brief from CP Kelco on September 16,
2013.\2\ Petitioner filed a rebuttal brief on September 20, 2013.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See case brief from CP Kelco, ``Purified
Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland; Case Brief'' (September 16,
2013) (CP Kelco's Case Brief).
\3\ See rebuttal brief from Petitioner, ``Purified
Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland; Rebuttal Brief'' (September 20,
2013) (Petitioner's Rebuttal Brief).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Period of Review (POR)
The POR is July 1, 2011, through June 30, 2012.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by this order is all purified
carboxymethylcellulose (CMC).\4\ The merchandise subject to this order
is classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) at subheading 3912.31.00.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ For a full description of the scope of the order, see
Memorandum from Richard Weible, Director, Office VI, Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Operations, to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2011
to 2012 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on
Purified Carboxymethylcellulose from Finland'' (Issues and Decision
Memorandum), which is dated concurrently with these final results
and incorporated herein by reference. The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS). IA ACCESS is
available to registered users at https://iaaccess.trade.gov and in
the Central Records Unit (CRU), Room 7046 of the main Department of
Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Issues and Decision
Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tolling of Deadlines
As explained in the memorandum from the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, the Department has exercised its discretion
to toll deadlines for the duration of the closure of the Federal
Government from October 1, through October 16, 2013. See Memorandum for
the Record from Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, ``Deadlines Affected by the Shutdown of the Federal
Government'' (October 18, 2013). Therefore, all deadlines in this
segment of the proceeding have been extended by 16 days. If the new
deadline falls on a non-business day, in accordance with the
Department's practice, the deadline will become the next business day.
The revised deadline for the final results of this review is now
January 2, 2014.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to
this antidumping investigation are addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum. A list of the issues raised is attached to this notice as
Appendix I. We have analyzed all interested party comments and have
made no changes to the Preliminary Results for these final results.
[[Page 1827]]
Final Results of Review
We determine that the following dumping margin exists for the
period July 1, 2011, through June 30, 2012:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Manufacturer/exporter dumping margin
(percentage)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CP Kelco Oy............................................. 3.40
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department will determine,
and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance
with the final results of this review. For assessment purposes, we
calculated importer (or customer)-specific assessment rates for
merchandise subject to this review. Where appropriate, we calculated an
ad valorem rate for each importer (or customer) by dividing the total
dumping margins for reviewed sales to that party by the total entered
values associated with those transactions. For duty assessment rates
calculated on this basis, we will direct CBP to assess the resulting ad
valorem rate against the entered customs values for the subject
merchandise. Where appropriate, we calculated a per-unit rate for each
importer (or customer) by dividing the total dumping margins for
reviewed sales to that party by the total sales quantity associated
with those transactions. For duty-assessment rates calculated on this
basis, we will direct CBP to assess the resulting per-unit rate against
the entered quantity of the subject merchandise. Where an importer (or
customer)-specific assessment rate is de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50
percent), the Department will instruct CBP to assess that importer (or
customer's) entries of subject merchandise without regard to
antidumping duties, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). The
Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days
after the date of publication of these final results of review.
The Department clarified its automatic assessment regulation on May
6, 2003. See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). This
clarification will apply to entries of subject merchandise during the
POR produced by the company included in these final results of review
for which the reviewed company did not know their merchandise was
destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP
to liquidate un-reviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no
rate for the intermediate company involved in the transaction.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of these
final results, consistent with section 751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) For
the company covered by this review, the cash deposit will be the rate
listed above; (2) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review,
but was covered in a previous review or the original less than fair
value (LTFV) investigation, the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the company-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) if
the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or
the original LTFV investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash
deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recent period
for the manufacturer of the merchandise; and (4) if neither the
exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm covered in this or any previous
review conducted by the Department, the cash deposit rate will continue
to be 6.65 percent, which is the all-others rate established in the
LTFV investigation. See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order; Purified
Carboxymethylcellulose From Finland; Mexico, the Netherlands and
Sweden, 70 FR 39734 (July 11, 2005). These deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues
to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: January 2, 2014.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
Appendix I
List of Topics Discussed in the Accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum
Issue: Authority To Conduct a Differential Pricing Analysis and
Apply an Alternative Comparison Methodology
[FR Doc. 2014-00173 Filed 1-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
