Pure Magnesium From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011-2012, 94-96 [2013-31412]
Download as PDF
94
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 1 / Thursday, January 2, 2014 / Notices
Dated: December 24, 2013.
Yvette S. Jackson,
Acting Administrator, Food and Nutrition
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013–31359 Filed 12–31–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Information Systems Technical
Advisory Committee; Notice of
Partially Closed Meeting
2013, pursuant to Section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. app. 2 § (10)(d))),
that the portion of the meeting
concerning trade secrets and
commercial or financial information
deemed privileged or confidential as
described in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and the
portion of the meeting concerning
matters the disclosure of which would
be likely to frustrate significantly
implementation of an agency action as
described in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B) shall
be exempt from the provisions relating
to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C.
app. 2 §§ 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). The
remaining portions of the meeting will
be open to the public.
For more information, call Yvette
Springer at (202) 482–2813.
A limited number of seats will be
available during the public session of
the meeting. Reservations are not
accepted. To the extent that time
permits, members of the public may
present oral statements to the
Committee. The public may submit
written statements at any time before or
after the meeting. However, to facilitate
distribution of public presentation
materials to the Committee members,
the Committee suggests that the
materials be forwarded before the
meeting to Ms. Springer.
The Assistant Secretary for
Administration, with the concurrence of
the General Counsel, formally
determined on September 23, 2013
pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5
U.S.C. app. 2 § 10(d), that the portion of
this meeting dealing with pre-decisional
changes to the Commerce Control List
and U.S. export control policies shall be
exempt from the provisions relating to
public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app.
2 §§ 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). The remaining
portions of the meeting will be open to
the public.
For more information contact Yvette
Springer on (202) 482–2813.
The Information Systems Technical
Advisory Committee (ISTAC) will meet
on January 22 and 23, 2014, 9:00 a.m.,
in the Herbert C. Hoover Building,
Room 3884, 14th Street between
Constitution and Pennsylvania Avenues
NW., Washington, DC. The Committee
advises the Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Export Administration on
technical questions that affect the level
of export controls applicable to
information systems equipment and
technology.
Dated: December 23, 2013.
Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
Wednesday, January 22
Bureau of Industry And Security
Open Session
Sensors and Instrumentation
Technical Advisory Committee; Notice
of Partially Closed Meeting
Dated: December 23, 2013.
Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
The Sensors and Instrumentation
Technical Advisory Committee (SITAC)
will meet on January 28, 2014, 9:30
a.m., in the Herbert C. Hoover Building,
Room 6087B, 14th Street between
Constitution and Pennsylvania Avenues
NW., Washington, DC. The Committee
advises the Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Export Administration on
technical questions that affect the level
of export controls applicable to sensors
and instrumentation equipment and
technology.
[FR Doc. 2013–31419 Filed 12–31–13; 8:45 am]
Agenda
AGENCY:
1. Welcome and Introductions.
2. Working Group Reports.
3. Industry Presentations.
4. New Business.
Thursday, January 23
maindgalligan on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Closed Session
5. Discussion of matters determined to
be exempt from the provisions relating
to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C.
app. 2 §§ 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3).
The open session will be accessible
via teleconference to 20 participants on
a first come, first serve basis. To join the
conference, submit inquiries to Ms.
Yvette Springer at Yvette.Springer@
bis.doc.gov, no later than January 15,
2014.
A limited number of seats will be
available for the public session.
Reservations are not accepted. To the
extent time permits, members of the
public may present oral statements to
the Committee. The public may submit
written statements at any time before or
after the meeting. However, to facilitate
distribution of public presentation
materials to Committee members, the
Committee suggests that public
presentation materials or comments be
forwarded before the meeting to Ms.
Springer.
The Assistant Secretary for
Administration, with the concurrence of
the delegate of the General Counsel,
formally determined on December 5,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:20 Dec 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
[FR Doc. 2013–31418 Filed 12–31–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–JT–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Public Session
1. Welcome and Introductions.
2. Remarks from the Bureau of
Industry and Security Management.
3. Industry Presentations.
4. New Business.
Closed Session
5. Discussion of matters determined to
be exempt from the provisions relating
to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C.
app. 2 §§ 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3).
The open session will be accessible
via teleconference to 20 participants on
a first come, first serve basis. To join the
conference, submit inquiries to Ms.
Yvette Springer at Yvette.Springer@
bis.doc.gov no later than January 21,
2014.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–832]
Pure Magnesium From the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2011–2012
Enforcement and Compliance,
formerly Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On June 10, 2013, the
Department of Commerce
(‘‘Department’’) published the
Preliminary Results of the 2011–2012
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on pure
magnesium from the People’s Republic
of China (‘‘PRC’’).1 The period of review
1 See Pure Magnesium from the People’s Republic
of China: Preliminary Results of 2011–2012
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 78 FR
34646 (June 10, 2013) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’) and
accompanying Memorandum to Ronald K.
Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, titled ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
Preliminary Results of 2011–2012 Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review: Pure Magnesium from
E:\FR\FM\02JAN1.SGM
02JAN1
95
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 1 / Thursday, January 2, 2014 / Notices
(‘‘POR’’) is May 1, 2011, through April
30, 2012. This review covers one
exporter of subject merchandise, Tianjin
Magnesium Metal Co., Ltd. (‘‘TMM’’)
and Tianjin Magnesium International
Co., Ltd. (‘‘TMI’’) (collectively, ‘‘TMM/
TMI’’).2 We invited interested parties to
comment on our Preliminary Results.
Based on our analysis of the comments
received, we made certain changes to
our margin calculations for TMM/TMI.
The final dumping margin for this
review is listed in the ‘‘Final Results’’
section below.
DATES: Effective Date: January 2, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brendan Quinn or Andrew Medley, AD/
CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–5848 or (202) 482–
4987, respectively.
Background
maindgalligan on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
On June 10, 2013, the Department
published its Preliminary Results of the
antidumping duty administrative review
of pure magnesium from the PRC.
Petitioner and TMM/TMI submitted
publicly available information regarding
surrogate values on July 15, 2013, and
rebuttal surrogate value information on
July 25, 2013.3 Petitioner and TMM/TMI
submitted case briefs on August 8, 2013,
and rebuttal briefs on August 15, 2013.4
the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated May 31,
2013 (‘‘Preliminary Decision Memorandum’’).
2 In the Preliminary Results, the Department
referred to ‘‘TMM/TMI’’ as ‘‘TMM/Company A,’’
due to the treatment of TMM’s affiliation with TMI
as business proprietary information. Subsequent to
the Preliminary Results, TMM publicly disclosed its
relationship with TMI, and the affiliation between
the two parties was made public for the remainder
of this proceeding. See Memorandum to the File,
from Brendan Quinn, International Trade
Compliance Analyst, titled, ‘‘Memorandum
Regarding the Public Treatment of Affiliation
Information Previously Bracketed as Proprietary,’’
dated June 25, 2013. This collapsing determination
is sustained for the final results. See Memorandum
to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
titled, ‘‘2011–2012 Administrative Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order on Pure Magnesium from
the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary
Affiliation and Collapsing Memorandum,’’ dated
May 31, 2013 (‘‘Affiliation and Collapsing
Memorandum’’). The collapsing decision is
unchanged for these final results. See Memorandum
to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, titled, ‘‘Pure
Magnesium from the People’s Republic of China:
Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final
Results of the 2011–2012 Administrative Review of
the Antidumping Duty Order,’’ dated concurrently
with this notice (‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum’’) at Comment 5.
3 Petitioner is the Aluminum Extrusions Fair
Trade Committee.
4 At the Department’s request, TMM/TMI
removed certain new factual information from its
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:20 Dec 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
As explained in the memorandum
from the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, the
Department exercised its discretion to
toll deadlines for the duration of the
closure of the Federal Government from
October 1, through October 16, 2013.5
Therefore, all deadlines in this segment
of the proceeding have been extended
by 16 days. If the new deadline falls on
a non-business day, in accordance with
the Department’s practice, the deadline
will become the next business day. The
revised deadline for the final results of
this review is now December 26, 2013.
Scope of the Order
Merchandise covered by the Order 6 is
pure magnesium regardless of
chemistry, form or size, unless expressly
excluded from the scope of the order.
Pure magnesium is a metal or alloy
containing by weight primarily the
element magnesium and produced by
decomposing raw materials into
magnesium metal.7 Pure magnesium
products covered by the order are
currently classifiable under Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States
(‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings 8104.11.00,
8104.19.00, 8104.20.00, 8104.30.00,
8104.90.00, 3824.90.11, 3824.90.19 and
9817.00.90. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, our
written description of the scope is
dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and
rebuttal briefs filed by parties in this
review are addressed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum, which is hereby
adopted by this notice. A list of the
issues that parties raised and to which
we responded in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum follows as an
appendix to this notice. The Issues and
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(‘‘IA ACCESS’’). IA ACCESS is available
to registered users at https://
rebuttal brief and resubmitted its revised rebuttal
case brief on September 25, 2013.
5 See Memorandum for the Record from Paul
Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance, titled ‘‘Deadlines Affected by the
Shutdown of the Federal Government,’’ dated
October 18, 2013.
6 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Pure
Magnesium From the People’s Republic of China,
the Russian Federation and Ukraine; Notice of
Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value: Antidumping Duty Investigation
of Pure Magnesium From the Russian Federation,
60 FR 25691 (May 12, 1995) (‘‘Order’’).
7 See Issues and Decision Memorandum for a full
description of the Scope of the Order.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
iaaccess.trade.gov and in the Central
Records Unit, room 7046 of the main
Department of Commerce building. In
addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly on the Internet at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The
paper copy and electronic version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
Separate Rates
In the Preliminary Results, we found
that TMM/TMI demonstrated its
eligibility for separate-rate status.8 No
party has placed any evidence on the
record of this review to contradict that
finding. Therefore, we continue to find
that TMM/TMI is eligible for separaterate status.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on an analysis of the comments
received, for the final results, the
Department made the following change
to TMM/TMI’s margin calculation:
• Surrogate Value for Input
Magnesium Scrap: We have used
Serbian import data for ‘‘magnesium
waste and scrap’’ to value the
magnesium alloy scrap input.9
• Surrogate Financial Ratios: We
have used the 2011 financial statements
for SOH Technologies Corp. and New
Anchor Foundry Shop Co. to calculate
average surrogate financial ratios.10
Final Results
We determine that the following
weighted-average dumping margin
exists for the POR:
Exporter
Tianjin Magnesium International Co., Ltd 11.
Weighted-average margin
0.03 percent (de
minimis).
8 See Preliminary Results, and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 7.
9 See Memorandum to the File from Andrew
Medley, International Trade Compliance Analyst,
titled ‘‘Final Results of the 2011–2012
Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty
Order on Pure Magnesium from the People’s
Republic of China: Surrogate Value Memorandum,’’
dated December 26, 2013 (‘‘Surrogate Value
Memorandum’’), and Memorandum to the File from
Andrew Medley, International Trade Compliance
Analyst, titled ‘‘2011–2012 Administrative Review
of the Antidumping Duty Order on Pure Magnesium
from the People’s Republic of China: Analysis of the
Final Results Margin Calculation for TMM/TMI,’’
dated December 26, 2013 (‘‘TMM/TMI Final
Analysis Memorandum’’). See also, Issues and
Decision Memorandum at Comment 2.
10 See Surrogate Value Memorandum and TMM/
TMI Final Analysis Memorandum. See also, Issues
and Decision Memorandum at Comment 3.
E:\FR\FM\02JAN1.SGM
02JAN1
96
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 1 / Thursday, January 2, 2014 / Notices
Assessment Rates
maindgalligan on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The Department will determine, and
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries covered
by this review. The Department intends
to issue assessment instructions to CBP
15 days after the publication date of
these final results of this review. In
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1),
we are calculating importer- (or
customer-) specific assessment rates for
the merchandise subject to this review.
For any individually examined
respondent whose weighted-average
dumping margin is above de minimis
(i.e., 0.50 percent), the Department will
calculate importer-specific assessment
rates on the basis of the ratio of the total
amount of dumping calculated for the
importer’s examined sales and the total
entered value of sales.12 We will
instruct CBP to assess antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries covered
by this review when the importerspecific assessment rate is above de
minimis. Where either the respondent’s
weighted-average dumping margin is
zero or de minimis, or an importerspecific assessment rate is zero or de
minimis, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties.
The Department recently announced a
refinement to its assessment practice in
NME cases.13 Pursuant to this
refinement in practice, for entries that
were not reported in the U.S. sales
databases submitted by companies
individually examined during this
review, the Department will instruct
CBP to liquidate such entries at the
NME-wide rate. In addition, if the
Department determines that an exporter
under review had no shipments of the
subject merchandise, any suspended
entries that entered under that
exporter’s case number (i.e., at that
exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at the
NME-wide rate. For a full discussion of
this practice, see NME Antidumping
Proceedings.
11 For these final results, the Department has
collapsed Tianjin Magnesium International Co., Ltd.
and Tianjin Magnesium Metal Co., Ltd. As a result
of this collapsing, the cash deposit rate for
shipments of pure magnesium from the People’s
Republic of China exported by Tianjin Magnesium
International Co., Ltd. also applies to exports of this
merchandise by Tianjin Magnesium Metal Co., Ltd.
12 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101
(February 14, 2012).
13 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76
FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (‘‘NME Antidumping
Proceedings’’).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:20 Dec 31, 2013
Jkt 232001
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
administrative review for all shipments
of the subject merchandise from the PRC
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date, as provided for by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For
TMM/TMI, the cash deposit rate will be
zero; (2) for previously investigated or
reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters
not listed above that have separate rates,
the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the exporter-specific rate published for
the most recent period; (3) for all PRC
exporters of subject merchandise which
have not been found to be entitled to a
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will
be the PRC-wide rate of 111.73 percent;
and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of
subject merchandise which have not
received their own rate, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate applicable to the
PRC exporter that supplied that nonPRC exporter. These deposit
requirements shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this POR.
Failure to comply with this requirement
could result in the Department’s
presumption that reimbursement of the
antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under the APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
Disclosure
We will disclose the calculations
performed within five days of the date
of publication of this notice to parties in
this proceeding, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.224(b).
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
We are issuing and publishing the
final results and notice in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of
the Act.
Dated: December 26, 2013.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
Appendix
Comment 1: Surrogate Country
Comment 2: Surrogate Value for Input
Magnesium Scrap
Comment 3: Surrogate Financial
Statements
Comment 4: Whether Alleged Translation
Errors and Omissions Warrant an
Adverse Inference
Comment 5: Whether the Department
Should Collapse TMM and TMI and
therefore Assign a Single AD Rate to the
Collapsed Entity
Comment 6: Whether To Identify the
Collapsed Affiliate in Customs
Instructions
Comment 7: Updating the PRC-Wide Rate
[FR Doc. 2013–31412 Filed 12–31–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–967]
Aluminum Extrusions From the
People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Rescission,
in Part, 2010/12
Enforcement and Compliance,
formerly Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(‘‘the Department’’) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on aluminum
extrusions from the People’s Republic of
China (‘‘PRC’’). The period of review
(‘‘POR’’) is November 12, 2010, through
April 30, 2012. These final results cover
62 companies for which an
administrative review was initiated,1
and for which this administrative
review was not rescinded in the
Preliminary Results.2 For these final
AGENCY:
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and
Request for Revocation in Part, 77 FR 40565 (July
10, 2012) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’). In the Initiation
Notice, 67 companies are listed. However, there
were entries for Taishan City Kam Kiu Aluminum
Extrusion Co., Ltd. and Taishan City Kam Kiu
Aluminium Extrusion Co., Ltd. which appear to be
the same entity, with the result that the Department
considers the Initiation Notice to cover 66
companies.
2 See Aluminum Extrusions From the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Results of
E:\FR\FM\02JAN1.SGM
02JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 1 (Thursday, January 2, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 94-96]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-31412]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-832]
Pure Magnesium From the People's Republic of China: Final Results
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011-2012
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, formerly Import Administration,
International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On June 10, 2013, the Department of Commerce (``Department'')
published the Preliminary Results of the 2011-2012 administrative
review of the antidumping duty order on pure magnesium from the
People's Republic of China (``PRC'').\1\ The period of review
[[Page 95]]
(``POR'') is May 1, 2011, through April 30, 2012. This review covers
one exporter of subject merchandise, Tianjin Magnesium Metal Co., Ltd.
(``TMM'') and Tianjin Magnesium International Co., Ltd. (``TMI'')
(collectively, ``TMM/TMI'').\2\ We invited interested parties to
comment on our Preliminary Results. Based on our analysis of the
comments received, we made certain changes to our margin calculations
for TMM/TMI. The final dumping margin for this review is listed in the
``Final Results'' section below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Pure Magnesium from the People's Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of 2011-2012 Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, 78 FR 34646 (June 10, 2013) (``Preliminary Results'') and
accompanying Memorandum to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant
Secretary for Import Administration, titled ``Decision Memorandum
for Preliminary Results of 2011-2012 Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review: Pure Magnesium from the People's Republic of China,'' dated
May 31, 2013 (``Preliminary Decision Memorandum'').
\2\ In the Preliminary Results, the Department referred to
``TMM/TMI'' as ``TMM/Company A,'' due to the treatment of TMM's
affiliation with TMI as business proprietary information. Subsequent
to the Preliminary Results, TMM publicly disclosed its relationship
with TMI, and the affiliation between the two parties was made
public for the remainder of this proceeding. See Memorandum to the
File, from Brendan Quinn, International Trade Compliance Analyst,
titled, ``Memorandum Regarding the Public Treatment of Affiliation
Information Previously Bracketed as Proprietary,'' dated June 25,
2013. This collapsing determination is sustained for the final
results. See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations,
titled, ``2011-2012 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty
Order on Pure Magnesium from the People's Republic of China:
Preliminary Affiliation and Collapsing Memorandum,'' dated May 31,
2013 (``Affiliation and Collapsing Memorandum''). The collapsing
decision is unchanged for these final results. See Memorandum to
Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance,
titled, ``Pure Magnesium from the People's Republic of China: Issues
and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2011-2012
Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order,'' dated
concurrently with this notice (``Issues and Decision Memorandum'')
at Comment 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective Date: January 2, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brendan Quinn or Andrew Medley, AD/CVD
Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
5848 or (202) 482-4987, respectively.
Background
On June 10, 2013, the Department published its Preliminary Results
of the antidumping duty administrative review of pure magnesium from
the PRC. Petitioner and TMM/TMI submitted publicly available
information regarding surrogate values on July 15, 2013, and rebuttal
surrogate value information on July 25, 2013.\3\ Petitioner and TMM/TMI
submitted case briefs on August 8, 2013, and rebuttal briefs on August
15, 2013.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Petitioner is the Aluminum Extrusions Fair Trade Committee.
\4\ At the Department's request, TMM/TMI removed certain new
factual information from its rebuttal brief and resubmitted its
revised rebuttal case brief on September 25, 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As explained in the memorandum from the Assistant Secretary for
Enforcement and Compliance, the Department exercised its discretion to
toll deadlines for the duration of the closure of the Federal
Government from October 1, through October 16, 2013.\5\ Therefore, all
deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by 16
days. If the new deadline falls on a non-business day, in accordance
with the Department's practice, the deadline will become the next
business day. The revised deadline for the final results of this review
is now December 26, 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Memorandum for the Record from Paul Piquado, Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, titled ``Deadlines
Affected by the Shutdown of the Federal Government,'' dated October
18, 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
Merchandise covered by the Order \6\ is pure magnesium regardless
of chemistry, form or size, unless expressly excluded from the scope of
the order. Pure magnesium is a metal or alloy containing by weight
primarily the element magnesium and produced by decomposing raw
materials into magnesium metal.\7\ Pure magnesium products covered by
the order are currently classifiable under Harmonized Tariff Schedule
of the United States (``HTSUS'') subheadings 8104.11.00, 8104.19.00,
8104.20.00, 8104.30.00, 8104.90.00, 3824.90.11, 3824.90.19 and
9817.00.90. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience
and customs purposes, our written description of the scope is
dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Pure Magnesium From
the People's Republic of China, the Russian Federation and Ukraine;
Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value: Antidumping Duty Investigation of Pure Magnesium From the
Russian Federation, 60 FR 25691 (May 12, 1995) (``Order'').
\7\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum for a full description of
the Scope of the Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs filed by parties
in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum,
which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues that
parties raised and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum follows as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System (``IA ACCESS''). IA ACCESS is
available to registered users at https://iaaccess.trade.gov and in the
Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce
building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The paper copy and electronic version of
the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
Separate Rates
In the Preliminary Results, we found that TMM/TMI demonstrated its
eligibility for separate-rate status.\8\ No party has placed any
evidence on the record of this review to contradict that finding.
Therefore, we continue to find that TMM/TMI is eligible for separate-
rate status.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Preliminary Results, and accompanying Preliminary
Decision Memorandum at 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on an analysis of the comments received, for the final
results, the Department made the following change to TMM/TMI's margin
calculation:
Surrogate Value for Input Magnesium Scrap: We have used
Serbian import data for ``magnesium waste and scrap'' to value the
magnesium alloy scrap input.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Memorandum to the File from Andrew Medley, International
Trade Compliance Analyst, titled ``Final Results of the 2011-2012
Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Pure
Magnesium from the People's Republic of China: Surrogate Value
Memorandum,'' dated December 26, 2013 (``Surrogate Value
Memorandum''), and Memorandum to the File from Andrew Medley,
International Trade Compliance Analyst, titled ``2011-2012
Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Pure
Magnesium from the People's Republic of China: Analysis of the Final
Results Margin Calculation for TMM/TMI,'' dated December 26, 2013
(``TMM/TMI Final Analysis Memorandum''). See also, Issues and
Decision Memorandum at Comment 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Surrogate Financial Ratios: We have used the 2011
financial statements for SOH Technologies Corp. and New Anchor Foundry
Shop Co. to calculate average surrogate financial ratios.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Surrogate Value Memorandum and TMM/TMI Final Analysis
Memorandum. See also, Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results
We determine that the following weighted-average dumping margin
exists for the POR:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exporter Weighted-average margin
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tianjin Magnesium International Co., Ltd 0.03 percent (de minimis).
\11\.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 96]]
Assessment Rates
The Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (``CBP'') shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this review. The Department intends to
issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date
of these final results of this review. In accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1), we are calculating importer- (or customer-) specific
assessment rates for the merchandise subject to this review. For any
individually examined respondent whose weighted-average dumping margin
is above de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent), the Department will calculate
importer-specific assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the
total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales
and the total entered value of sales.\12\ We will instruct CBP to
assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this
review when the importer-specific assessment rate is above de minimis.
Where either the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero
or de minimis, or an importer-specific assessment rate is zero or de
minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to antidumping duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ For these final results, the Department has collapsed
Tianjin Magnesium International Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Magnesium
Metal Co., Ltd. As a result of this collapsing, the cash deposit
rate for shipments of pure magnesium from the People's Republic of
China exported by Tianjin Magnesium International Co., Ltd. also
applies to exports of this merchandise by Tianjin Magnesium Metal
Co., Ltd.
\12\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Department recently announced a refinement to its assessment
practice in NME cases.\13\ Pursuant to this refinement in practice, for
entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by
companies individually examined during this review, the Department will
instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the NME-wide rate. In
addition, if the Department determines that an exporter under review
had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries that
entered under that exporter's case number (i.e., at that exporter's
rate) will be liquidated at the NME-wide rate. For a full discussion of
this practice, see NME Antidumping Proceedings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment
of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (``NME
Antidumping Proceedings'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all
shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as
provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For TMM/TMI, the
cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for previously investigated or
reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that have separate
rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific
rate published for the most recent period; (3) for all PRC exporters of
subject merchandise which have not been found to be entitled to a
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate of
111.73 percent; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject
merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit
rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that
non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements shall remain in effect
until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in the Department's presumption that
reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction
of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
Disclosure
We will disclose the calculations performed within five days of the
date of publication of this notice to parties in this proceeding, in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
We are issuing and publishing the final results and notice in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: December 26, 2013.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
Appendix
Comment 1: Surrogate Country
Comment 2: Surrogate Value for Input Magnesium Scrap
Comment 3: Surrogate Financial Statements
Comment 4: Whether Alleged Translation Errors and Omissions
Warrant an Adverse Inference
Comment 5: Whether the Department Should Collapse TMM and TMI
and therefore Assign a Single AD Rate to the Collapsed Entity
Comment 6: Whether To Identify the Collapsed Affiliate in
Customs Instructions
Comment 7: Updating the PRC-Wide Rate
[FR Doc. 2013-31412 Filed 12-31-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P