University of Virginia, et al.; Notice of Consolidated Decision on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscope, 77424-77425 [2013-30568]

Download as PDF 77424 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 246 / Monday, December 23, 2013 / Notices in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). The Department received no substantive response from any respondent interested parties. In accordance with section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department has conducted expedited (120-day) sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders on raw flexible magnets from the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Scope of the Orders The products subject to these orders are certain flexible magnets regardless of shape,2 color, or packaging.3 The complete scope language of these orders is listed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum), which is hereby adopted by this notice. The products subject to the orders are currently classifiable principally under subheadings 8505.19.10 and 8505.19.20 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The HTSUS subheadings are provided only for convenience and customs purposes; the written description of the scope of the orders is dispositive. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in these reviews are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, including the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping in the event of revocation and the magnitude of dumping margins likely to prevail if the orders were revoked. Parties can find a complete discussion of all issues raised in these reviews and the corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum, which is on file electronically via IA ACCESS. IA ACCESS is available to registered users at http://iaaccess.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit (CRU) in Room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at http:// enforcement.ita.doc.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. 2 The term ‘‘shape’’ includes, but is not limited to profiles, which are flexible magnets with a nonrectangular cross-section. 3 Packaging includes retail or specialty packaging such as digital printer cartridges. VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:12 Dec 20, 2013 Jkt 232001 Related records can be viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in Room 3720, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC. Docket Number: 13–025. Applicant: University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904–4745. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI Company, the Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 78 FR 52760, August 26, 2013. WeightedManufacturers/producers/ average Docket Number: 13–026. Applicant: exporters margin Yale University, 850 West Haven, CT (percent) 06516. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., Japan. People’s Republic of China: Exporters with a separate rate 105.00 Intended Use: See notice at 78 FR Exporters which are part of 52760, August 26, 2013. the country-wide entity ........ 185.28 Docket Number: 13–027. Applicant: Taiwan: Kin Fong Magnets Co., Ltd ..... 38.03 United States Army Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense, Aberdeen Magruba Flexible Magnets Co., Ltd ................................ 38.03 Proving Ground, MD 21010–5400. JASDI Magnet Co., Ltd ........... 38.03 Instrument: Electron Microscope. All others ................................. 31.20 Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 78 FR Notification to Interested Parties 52760, August 26, 2013. This notice serves as a reminder to Docket Number: 13–029. Applicant: parties subject to administrative Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ protective order (APO) of their 85287–5212. Instrument: Electron responsibility concerning the Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI disposition of proprietary information Company, the Netherlands. Intended disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a). Timely written Use: See notice at 78 FR 52760, August 26, 2013. notification of the destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial Docket Number: 13–032. Applicant: protective order is hereby requested. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Failure to comply with the regulations Chevy Chase, MD 20815. Instrument: and terms of an APO is a violation Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI which is subject to sanction. Company, Czech Republic. Intended The Department is issuing and Use: See notice at 78 FR 52760, August publishing the final results and notice 26, 2013. in accordance with sections 751(c), Docket Number: 13–033. Applicant: 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 University of Pittsburgh School of CFR 351.221(c)(5)(ii). Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15261. Dated: December 16, 2013. Instrument: Electron Microsocpe. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., Japan. Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement Intended Use: See notice at 78 FR and Compliance. 52760, August 26, 2013. [FR Doc. 2013–30511 Filed 12–20–13; 8:45 am] Comments: None received. Decision: BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Approved. No instrument of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such purposes as this DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE instrument is intended to be used, is International Trade Administration being manufactured in the United States at the time the instrument was ordered. University of Virginia, et al.; Notice of Reasons: Each foreign instrument is an Consolidated Decision on Applications electron microscope and is intended for for Duty-Free Entry of Electron research or scientific educational uses Microscope requiring an electron microscope. We This is a decision consolidated know of no electron microscope, or any pursuant to Section 6(c) of the other instrument suited to these Educational, Scientific, and Cultural purposes, which was being Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. manufactured in the United States at the L. 89–651, as amended by Pub. L. 106– time of order of each instrument. 36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). Final Results of Reviews The Department determines that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on raw flexible magnets from the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the following weighted-average percentage margins: PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23DEN1.SGM 23DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 246 / Monday, December 23, 2013 / Notices Dated: December 17, 2013. Gregory W. Campbell, Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office, Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2013–30568 Filed 12–20–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–570–923] Raw Flexible Magnets From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review Enforcement and Compliance, formerly Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On August 1, 2013, the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) initiated a sunset review of the countervailing duty (‘‘CVD’’) order on raw flexible magnets (‘‘RFM’’) from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’). On the basis of a notice of intent to participate and an adequate substantive response filed on behalf of the domestic interested parties and an inadequate response from respondent interested parties (in this case, no response), the Department conducted an expedited sunset review of this CVD order pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(B). As a result of this sunset review, the Department finds that revocation of the CVD order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy at the level indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this notice. DATES: Effective Date: December 23, 2013. AGENCY: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristen Johnson, Office III, AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4793. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Background On August 1, 2013, the Department initiated a sunset review of the CVD order on RFP from the PRC pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act.1 The Department received a notice of intent to participate in the review on behalf of 1 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 78 FR 46575 (August 1, 2013). VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:12 Dec 20, 2013 Jkt 232001 Magnum Magnetics Corporation of Marietta, Ohio (‘‘Magnum Magnetics’’) within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). Magnum Magnetics claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act, as a domestic producer of the domestic like product. The Department received adequate substantive responses collectively from Magnum Magnetics within the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). The Department did not receive a substantive response from any government or respondent interested party to the proceeding. Because the Department received no response from the respondent interested parties, the Department conducted an expedited review of this CVD order, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). Scope of the Order The products covered by this order are certain flexible magnets regardless of shape,2 color, or packaging.3 Subject flexible magnets are bonded magnets composed (not necessarily exclusively) of (i) any one or combination of various flexible binders (such as polymers or copolymers, or rubber) and (ii) a magnetic element, which may consist of a ferrite permanent magnet material (commonly, strontium or barium ferrite, or a combination of the two), a metal alloy (such as NdFeB or Alnico), any combination of the foregoing with each other or any other material, or any other material capable of being permanently magnetized. Subject flexible magnets may be in either magnetized or unmagnetized (including demagnetized) condition, and may or may not be fully or partially laminated or fully or partially bonded with paper, plastic, or other material, of any composition and/or color. Subject flexible magnets may be uncoated or may be coated with an adhesive or any other coating or combination of coatings. Specifically excluded from the scope of this order are printed flexible magnets, defined as flexible magnets (including individual magnets) that are laminated or bonded with paper, plastic, or other material if such paper, plastic, or other material bears printed text and/or images, including but not limited to business cards, calendars, poetry, sports event schedules, business promotions, decorative motifs, and the like. This exclusion does not apply to 2 The term ‘‘shape’’ includes, but is not limited to profiles, which are flexible magnets with a nonrectangular cross-section. 3 Packaging includes retail or specialty packaging such as digital printer cartridges. PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 77425 such printed flexible magnets if the printing concerned consists of only the following: A trade mark or trade name; country of origin; border, stripes, or lines; any printing that is removed in the course of cutting and/or printing magnets for retail sale or other disposition from the flexible magnet; manufacturing or use instructions (e.g., ‘‘print this side up,’’ ‘‘this side up,’’ ‘‘laminate here’’); printing on adhesive backing (that is, material to be removed in order to expose adhesive for use such as application of laminate) or on any other covering that is removed from the flexible magnet prior or subsequent to final printing and before use; nonpermanent printing (that is, printing in a medium that facilitates easy removal, permitting the flexible magnet to be reprinted); printing on the back (magnetic) side; or any combination of the above. All products meeting the physical description of subject merchandise that are not specifically excluded are within the scope of this order. The products covered by the order are currently classifiable principally under subheadings 8505.19.10 and 8505.19.20 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). The HTSUS subheadings are provided only for convenience and customs purposes; the written description of the scope of this order is dispositive. For a full description of the scope, see ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Raw Flexible Magnets from the People’s Republic of China’’ from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently with this final notice, and hereby adopted by this notice (‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum’’). Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in this review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. The issues discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum include the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy and the net countervailable subsidy likely to prevail if the order were revoked. Parties can find a complete discussion of all issues raised in this expedited sunset review and the corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum which is on file electronically via the Import Administration Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS). IA ACCESS is available to registered E:\FR\FM\23DEN1.SGM 23DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 246 (Monday, December 23, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77424-77425]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-30568]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


University of Virginia, et al.; Notice of Consolidated Decision 
on Applications for Duty-Free Entry of Electron Microscope

    This is a decision consolidated pursuant to Section 6(c) of the 
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 
(Pub. L. 89-651, as amended by Pub. L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR 
part 301). Related records can be viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 
p.m. in Room 3720, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution 
Avenue NW., Washington, DC.
    Docket Number: 13-025. Applicant: University of Virginia, 
Charlottesville, VA 22904-4745. Instrument: Electron Microscope. 
Manufacturer: FEI Company, the Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 
78 FR 52760, August 26, 2013.
    Docket Number: 13-026. Applicant: Yale University, 850 West Haven, 
CT 06516. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., 
Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 78 FR 52760, August 26, 2013.
    Docket Number: 13-027. Applicant: United States Army Medical 
Research Institute of Chemical Defense, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 
21010-5400. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., 
Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 78 FR 52760, August 26, 2013.
    Docket Number: 13-029. Applicant: Arizona State University, Tempe, 
AZ 85287-5212. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: FEI 
Company, the Netherlands. Intended Use: See notice at 78 FR 52760, 
August 26, 2013.
    Docket Number: 13-032. Applicant: Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 
Chevy Chase, MD 20815. Instrument: Electron Microscope. Manufacturer: 
FEI Company, Czech Republic. Intended Use: See notice at 78 FR 52760, 
August 26, 2013.
    Docket Number: 13-033. Applicant: University of Pittsburgh School 
of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15261. Instrument: Electron Microsocpe. 
Manufacturer: JEOL Ltd., Japan. Intended Use: See notice at 78 FR 
52760, August 26, 2013.
    Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. No instrument of 
equivalent scientific value to the foreign instrument, for such 
purposes as this instrument is intended to be used, is being 
manufactured in the United States at the time the instrument was 
ordered. Reasons: Each foreign instrument is an electron microscope and 
is intended for research or scientific educational uses requiring an 
electron microscope. We know of no electron microscope, or any other 
instrument suited to these purposes, which was being manufactured in 
the United States at the time of order of each instrument.


[[Page 77425]]


     Dated: December 17, 2013.
Gregory W. Campbell,
Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office, Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2013-30568 Filed 12-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P