Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance, 77498-77501 [2013-30353]
Download as PDF
77498
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 246 / Monday, December 23, 2013 / Notices
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Agency: DOL–OSHA.
Title of Collection: Construction Fall
Protection Systems Criteria and
Practices and Training Requirements.
OMB Control Number: 1218–0197.
Affected Public: Private Sector—
businesses or other for-profits.
Total Estimated Number of
Respondents: 379,305.
Total Estimated Number of
Responses: 5,703,775.
Total Estimated Annual Burden
Hours: 457,108.
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs
Burden: $0.
Dated: December 17, 2013.
Michel Smyth,
Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–30421 Filed 12–20–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19
U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers by (TA–W) number issued
during the period of December 2, 2013
through December 6, 2013.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(a) of the Act must be met.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:12 Dec 20, 2013
Jkt 232001
I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the
following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) the sales or production, or both, of
such firm have decreased absolutely;
and
(3) One of the following must be
satisfied:
(A) Imports of articles or services like
or directly competitive with articles
produced or services supplied by such
firm have increased;
(B) imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles into which one
or more component parts produced by
such firm are directly incorporated,
have increased;
(C) imports of articles directly
incorporating one or more component
parts produced outside the United
States that are like or directly
competitive with imports of articles
incorporating one or more component
parts produced by such firm have
increased;
(D) imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are
produced directly using services
supplied by such firm, have increased;
and
(4) the increase in imports contributed
importantly to such workers’ separation
or threat of separation and to the decline
in the sales or production of such firm;
or
II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the
following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) One of the following must be
satisfied:
(A) There has been a shift by the
workers’ firm to a foreign country in the
production of articles or supply of
services like or directly competitive
with those produced/supplied by the
workers’ firm;
(B) there has been an acquisition from
a foreign country by the workers’ firm
of articles/services that are like or
directly competitive with those
produced/supplied by the workers’ firm;
and
(3) the shift/acquisition contributed
importantly to the workers’ separation
or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in public agencies and
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
eligibility requirements of Section
222(b) of the Act must be met.
(1) a significant number or proportion
of the workers in the public agency have
become totally or partially separated, or
are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
(2) the public agency has acquired
from a foreign country services like or
directly competitive with services
which are supplied by such agency; and
(3) the acquisition of services
contributed importantly to such
workers’ separation or threat of
separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected secondary workers of a firm and
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(c) of the Act must be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in the workers’ firm have
become totally or partially separated, or
are threatened to become totally or
partially separated;
(2) the workers’ firm is a Supplier or
Downstream Producer to a firm that
employed a group of workers who
received a certification of eligibility
under Section 222(a) of the Act, and
such supply or production is related to
the article or service that was the basis
for such certification; and
(3) either—
(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier
and the component parts it supplied to
the firm described in paragraph (2)
accounted for at least 20 percent of the
production or sales of the workers’ firm;
or
(B) a loss of business by the workers’
firm with the firm described in
paragraph (2) contributed importantly to
the workers’ separation or threat of
separation.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in firms identified by
the International Trade Commission and
a certification issued regarding
eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section 222(f)
of the Act must be met.
(1) The workers’ firm is publicly
identified by name by the International
Trade Commission as a member of a
domestic industry in an investigation
resulting in—
(A) An affirmative determination of
serious injury or threat thereof under
section 202(b)(1);
(B) an affirmative determination of
market disruption or threat thereof
under section 421(b)(1); or
E:\FR\FM\23DEN1.SGM
23DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 246 / Monday, December 23, 2013 / Notices
(C) an affirmative final determination
of material injury or threat thereof under
section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of
the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) the petition is filed during the 1year period beginning on the date on
which—
(A) A summary of the report
submitted to the President by the
International Trade Commission under
section 202(f)(1) with respect to the
affirmative determination described in
paragraph (1)(A) is published in the
Federal Register under section 202(f)(3);
or
(B) notice of an affirmative
determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the
Federal Register; and
(3) the workers have become totally or
partially separated from the workers’
firm within—
(A) The 1-year period described in
paragraph (2); or
(B) notwithstanding section 223(b)(1),
the 1-year period preceding the 1-year
period described in paragraph (2).
77499
Affirmative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been
issued. The date following the company
name and location of each
determination references the impact
date for all workers of such
determination.
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the
Trade Act have been met.
TA–W No.
Subject firm
Location
82,963 ..........
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, North Goodman Street Facility, Valeant
Pharmaceuticals, Kelly Services.
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, Bausch & Lomb Place Facility, Valeant
Pharmaceuticals, Kelly Services.
Norandal USA, Inc., Noranda Aluminum, Inc., Select Staffing ..................
Rochester, NY ......................
August 7, 2012.
Rochester, NY ......................
August 7, 2012.
Salisbury, NC .......................
November 8, 2012.
82,963A .......
83,213 ..........
The following certifications have been
issued. The requirements of Section
222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or
Impact date
services) of the Trade Act have been
met.
TA–W No.
Subject firm
Location
82,831 ..........
IBM Corporation, Integrated Supply Chain Engineering, Experis, Manpower, Celestica and Jabil.
IBM Corporation, Silicon Solutions Engineering and Electronic Design
Automation, ASIC, etc.
IBM Corporation, IBM Internal Accounts Team .........................................
Micron Technology, Inc ..............................................................................
Micron Technology, Inc ..............................................................................
Micron Technology, Inc ..............................................................................
Micron Technology, Inc ..............................................................................
Micron Technology, Inc ..............................................................................
Micron Semiconductor Products .................................................................
Micron Technology, Inc ..............................................................................
Micron Technology, Inc ..............................................................................
Micron Technology, Inc ..............................................................................
Micron Technology Texas, LLC ..................................................................
Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc ..........................................................
Micron Technology, Inc ..............................................................................
Micron Technology Puerto Rico, Inc ..........................................................
Citibank, N.A., Enterprise Operations & Technology, Citi Procurement,
Randstad, etc.
Citibank, N.A., Enterprise Operations & Technology, Citi Procurement,
Randstad, etc.
AMP—A Fletcher Company, The Fletcher-Terry Company, LLC, Express
Personnel Services.
Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company, Provider Data Management
Team, Robert Half and Office Overload, etc.
Decanter Diversified Machine, Inc., Decanter Machine, Inc., Labor
Ready Mid-Atlantic, etc.
Dow Jones & Company, Inc., News Corporation, Customer Service/Call
Center Support, Aerotek, etc.
Dow Jones & Company, Inc., News Corporation, Customer Service/Call
Center Support, Aerotek, etc.
Dow Jones & Company, Inc., News Corporation, Customer Service/Call
Center Support, Aerotek, etc.
Covidien LP, Medical Devices Division, Kelly Services .............................
Amphenol Corporation, Aerospace and Industrial Division, Staffworks,
Adecco, etc.
Poughkeepsie, NY ...............
June 20, 2012.
Williston, VT .........................
June 21, 2012.
Austin, TX .............................
Boise, ID ...............................
Fremont, CA .........................
San Jose, CA .......................
Folsom, CA ..........................
Longmont, CO ......................
Meridian, ID ..........................
Nampa, ID ............................
Boise, ID ...............................
Minneapolis, MN ..................
Allen, TX ...............................
Round Rock, TX ...................
Manassas, VA ......................
Aguadilla, PR .......................
New York, NY ......................
July 22, 2012.
August 1, 2012.
August 1, 2012.
August 1, 2012.
August 1, 2012.
August 1, 2012.
August 1, 2012.
August 1, 2012.
August 1, 2012.
August 1, 2012.
August 1, 2012.
August 1, 2012.
August 1, 2012.
August 1, 2012.
October 11, 2012.
Tampa, FL ............................
October 11, 2012.
Pontotoc, MS ........................
October 21, 2012.
St. Louis, MO .......................
October 24, 2012.
Roebuck, SC ........................
October 24, 2012.
Chicopee, MA .......................
November 8, 2012.
New York, NY ......................
November 8, 2012.
Princeton, NJ ........................
November 8, 2012.
Argyle, NY ............................
Sidney, NY ...........................
December 3, 2013.
December 16, 2013.
82,839 ..........
82,925 ..........
82,956 ..........
82,956A .......
82,956B .......
82,956C .......
82,956D .......
82,956E .......
82,956F ........
82,956G .......
82,956H .......
82,956I .........
82,956J ........
82,956K .......
82,956L ........
83,132 ..........
83,132A .......
83,160 ..........
83,171 ..........
83,172 ..........
83,215 ..........
83,215A .......
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
83,215B .......
83,228 ..........
83,229 ..........
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:12 Dec 20, 2013
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\23DEN1.SGM
23DEN1
Impact date
77500
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 246 / Monday, December 23, 2013 / Notices
Negative Determinations for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the
investigation revealed that the eligibility
criteria for worker adjustment assistance
have not been met for the reasons
specified.
The investigation revealed that the
criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or
TA–W No.
Subject firm
83,105 ..........
Contact Industries, Inc., Clear Pine Mouldings, Inc., Mid Oregon Personnel and Select, etc.
Native Accents LLC ....................................................................................
83,159 ..........
The investigation revealed that the
criteria under paragraphs(a)(2)(A)
Location
Big Sky, MT.
IBM Corporation, Systems Technology Group, Packaging Development,
Product Engineering.
IBM Corporation, Enterprise Systems Tech Support, Systems Technology, Computer Task Group.
Alpha Wire, Belden Division, Belden, Inc., Mirco Tech Staffing, Infinity
Staffing, etc.
YP Texas Region Yellow Pages LLC, Olivette Telephone Sales Division,
YP Subsidiary Holdings LLC, etc.
country) of section 222 have not been
met.
Subject firm
82,831A .......
82,831B .......
83,057 ..........
83,122 ..........
Determinations Terminating
Investigations of Petitions for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
Location
TA–W No.
Poughkeepsie, NY.
Leominster, MA.
Olivette, MO.
HSBC Card Services, Inc., Bilingual Customer Services Department ......
The following determinations
terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioner has requested
that the petition be withdrawn.
Subject firm
83,212 ..........
The following determinations
terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioning groups of
TA–W No.
83,062 ..........
83,089 ..........
83,089A .......
83,089B .......
83,089C .......
83,089D .......
83,089E .......
83,089F ........
83,089G .......
83,089H .......
83,089I .........
83,089J ........
83,089K .......
83,089L ........
Location
workers are covered by active
certifications. Consequently, further
investigation in these cases would serve
The following determinations
terminating investigations were issued
Subject firm
83,251 ..........
AT&T .........................................................................................................
18:12 Dec 20, 2013
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00084
filed earlier covering the same
petitioners.
Location
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Impact date
Manassas, VA.
Boise, ID.
Fremont, CA.
San Jose, CA.
Folsom, CA.
Longmont, CO.
Meridian, ID.
Nampa, ID.
Boise, ID.
Minneapolis, MN.
Allen, TX.
Round Rock, TX.
Manassas, VA.
Aguadilla, PR.
because the petitions are the subject of
ongoing investigations under petitions
TA–W No.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
no purpose since the petitioning group
of workers cannot be covered by more
than one certification at a time.
Location
Technology, Inc ..............................................................................
Technology, Inc ..............................................................................
Technology, Inc ..............................................................................
Technology, Inc ..............................................................................
Technology, Inc ..............................................................................
Technology, Inc ..............................................................................
Semiconductor Products .................................................................
Technology, Inc ..............................................................................
Technology, Inc ..............................................................................
Technology, Inc ..............................................................................
Technology Texas, LLC ..................................................................
Semiconductor Products, Inc ..........................................................
Technology, Inc ..............................................................................
Technology Puerto Rico, Inc ..........................................................
Impact date
Tulsa, OK.
Subject firm
Micron
Micron
Micron
Micron
Micron
Micron
Micron
Micron
Micron
Micron
Micron
Micron
Micron
Micron
Impact date
Hopewell Junction, NY.
on the Department’s Web site, as
required by Section 221 of the Act (19
U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated
investigations of these petitions.
After notice of the petitions was
published in the Federal Register and
Impact date
Prineville, OR.
(increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift
in production or services to a foreign
TA–W number
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
(b)(1), or (c)(1)(employment decline or
threat of separation) of section 222 has
not been met.
Dallas, TX.
E:\FR\FM\23DEN1.SGM
23DEN1
Impact date
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 246 / Monday, December 23, 2013 / Notices
I hereby certify that the
aforementioned determinations were
issued during the period of December 2,
2013 through December 6, 2013. These
determinations are available on the
Department’s Web site tradeact/taa/taa_
search_form.cfm under the searchable
listing of determinations or by calling
the Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance toll free at 888–365–6822.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of
December 2013.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2013–30353 Filed 12–20–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Investigations Regarding Eligibility To
Apply for Worker Adjustment
Assistance
Petitions have been filed with the
Secretary of Labor under Section 221 (a)
of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and
are identified in the Appendix to this
notice. Upon receipt of these petitions,
the Director of the Office of Trade
Adjustment Assistance, Employment
and Training Administration, has
instituted investigations pursuant to
Section 221 (a) of the Act.
The purpose of each of the
investigations is to determine whether
the workers are eligible to apply for
adjustment assistance under Title II,
Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations
will further relate, as appropriate, to the
determination of the date on which total
or partial separations began or
threatened to begin and the subdivision
of the firm involved.
77501
The petitioners or any other persons
showing a substantial interest in the
subject matter of the investigations may
request a public hearing, provided such
request is filed in writing with the
Director, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance, at the address shown below,
not later than January 2, 2014.
Interested persons are invited to
submit written comments regarding the
subject matter of the investigations to
the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance, at the address shown below,
not later than January 2, 2014.
The petitions filed in this case are
available for inspection at the Office of
the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance, Employment and Training
Administration, U.S. Department of
Labor, Room N–5428, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of
December 2013.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
APPENDIX
22 TAA Petitions Instituted Between 12/2/13 and 12/6/13
Date of
institution
Date of
petition
TA–W
Subject firm (petitioners)
Location
83252 ................
83253 ................
83254 ................
Congoleum (State/One-Stop) ...............................................
Georgia Pacific Wood Products, LLC (Company) ...............
Brady Worldwide, Inc. dba Electromark Inc. (State/OneStop).
General Dynamics (OTS Division) (State/One-Stop) ...........
IBM (State/One-Stop) ...........................................................
Cromaglass Corporation (Company) ....................................
Apex Tool Group (State/One-Stop) ......................................
Multi Packaging Solutions (MPS) (Union) ............................
Spellman High Voltage Electronics Corp. (State/One-Stop)
Hewlett Packard (Workers) ..................................................
OSRAM Sylvania (Company) ...............................................
Quantum Spatial (State/One-Stop) ......................................
Block and Company, Inc. (Company) ..................................
AT&T (Workers) ....................................................................
WW Metal Fab—WW Group (Workers) ...............................
Titan Tire (Workers) .............................................................
Magnetics Div of Spang & Company (Company) ................
Daikin McQuay (Union) ........................................................
Minnesota Rubber and Plastics (Company) ........................
ShoeDazzle (Workers) .........................................................
Ocwen Financial Corporation (Workers) ..............................
BNY Mellon (Workers) ..........................................................
Trenton, NJ ...........................
Jarratt, VA .............................
Wolcott, NY ...........................
12/02/13
12/03/13
12/03/13
11/30/13
11/22/13
11/18/13
Moses Lake, WA ...................
Boulder, CO ..........................
Williamsport, PA ....................
Garland, TX ...........................
Terre Haute, IN .....................
Hauppauge, NY ....................
Omaha, NE ...........................
York, PA ................................
Seattle, WA ...........................
Bristol, TN .............................
Pasadena, CA .......................
Milwaukee, OR ......................
Bryan, OH .............................
Pittsburg, PA .........................
Auburn, NY ...........................
Watertown, SD ......................
Los Angeles, CA ...................
Fort Washington, PA .............
Brooklyn, NY .........................
12/03/13
12/03/13
12/03/13
12/04/13
12/04/13
12/04/13
12/04/13
12/05/13
12/05/13
12/05/13
12/05/13
12/05/13
12/05/13
12/05/13
12/05/13
12/06/13
12/06/13
12/06/13
12/06/13
11/27/13
12/02/13
12/02/13
12/03/13
12/03/13
12/03/13
12/02/13
12/04/13
12/05/13
12/04/13
12/04/13
11/26/13
11/15/13
11/14/13
12/04/13
11/19/13
12/05/13
12/06/13
12/01/13
83255
83256
83257
83258
83259
83260
83261
83262
83263
83264
83265
83266
83267
83268
83269
83270
83271
83272
83273
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
................
[FR Doc. 2013–30354 Filed 12–20–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[Notice: 13–153]
NASA Aerospace Safety Advisory
Panel; Meeting
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of Meeting.
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:12 Dec 20, 2013
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
In accordance with the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public
Law 92–463, as amended, the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration
announces a forthcoming meeting of the
Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel.
SUMMARY:
Thursday, January 23, 2014, 1:00
p.m. to 2:00 p.m., Local Time.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\23DEN1.SGM
23DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 246 (Monday, December 23, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77498-77501]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-30353]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding Eligibility To Apply for
Worker Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended
(19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment
assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of
December 2, 2013 through December 6, 2013.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to
apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) the sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased
absolutely; and
(3) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive
with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have
increased;
(B) imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are
directly incorporated, have increased;
(C) imports of articles directly incorporating one or more
component parts produced outside the United States that are like or
directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more
component parts produced by such firm have increased;
(D) imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles
which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have
increased; and
(4) the increase in imports contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the
sales or production of such firm; or
II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) One of the following must be satisfied:
(A) There has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign
country in the production of articles or supply of services like or
directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm;
(B) there has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the
workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly
competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and
(3) the shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers'
separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must
be met.
(1) a significant number or proportion of the workers in the public
agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to
become totally or partially separated;
(2) the public agency has acquired from a foreign country services
like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such
agency; and
(3) the acquisition of services contributed importantly to such
workers' separation or threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected secondary workers of a firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each
of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must
be met.
(1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the
workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are
threatened to become totally or partially separated;
(2) the workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a
firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of
eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or
production is related to the article or service that was the basis for
such certification; and
(3) either--
(A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it
supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least
20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or
(B) a loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described
in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or
threat of separation.
In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely
affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade
Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply
for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility
requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met.
(1) The workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the
International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an
investigation resulting in--
(A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat
thereof under section 202(b)(1);
(B) an affirmative determination of market disruption or threat
thereof under section 421(b)(1); or
[[Page 77499]]
(C) an affirmative final determination of material injury or threat
thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of
1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A));
(2) the petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the
date on which--
(A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the
International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to
the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is
published in the Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); or
(B) notice of an affirmative determination described in
subparagraph (1) is published in the Federal Register; and
(3) the workers have become totally or partially separated from the
workers' firm within--
(A) The 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or
(B) notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding
the 1-year period described in paragraph (2).
Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
The following certifications have been issued. The date following
the company name and location of each determination references the
impact date for all workers of such determination.
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been
met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
82,963............... Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, North Rochester, NY....... August 7, 2012.
Goodman Street Facility, Valeant
Pharmaceuticals, Kelly Services.
82,963A.............. Bausch & Lomb Incorporated, Bausch Rochester, NY....... August 7, 2012.
& Lomb Place Facility, Valeant
Pharmaceuticals, Kelly Services.
83,213............... Norandal USA, Inc., Noranda Salisbury, NC....... November 8, 2012.
Aluminum, Inc., Select Staffing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of
Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act
have been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
82,831............... IBM Corporation, Integrated Supply Poughkeepsie, NY.... June 20, 2012.
Chain Engineering, Experis,
Manpower, Celestica and Jabil.
82,839............... IBM Corporation, Silicon Solutions Williston, VT....... June 21, 2012.
Engineering and Electronic Design
Automation, ASIC, etc.
82,925............... IBM Corporation, IBM Internal Austin, TX.......... July 22, 2012.
Accounts Team.
82,956............... Micron Technology, Inc............. Boise, ID........... August 1, 2012.
82,956A.............. Micron Technology, Inc............. Fremont, CA......... August 1, 2012.
82,956B.............. Micron Technology, Inc............. San Jose, CA........ August 1, 2012.
82,956C.............. Micron Technology, Inc............. Folsom, CA.......... August 1, 2012.
82,956D.............. Micron Technology, Inc............. Longmont, CO........ August 1, 2012.
82,956E.............. Micron Semiconductor Products...... Meridian, ID........ August 1, 2012.
82,956F.............. Micron Technology, Inc............. Nampa, ID........... August 1, 2012.
82,956G.............. Micron Technology, Inc............. Boise, ID........... August 1, 2012.
82,956H.............. Micron Technology, Inc............. Minneapolis, MN..... August 1, 2012.
82,956I.............. Micron Technology Texas, LLC....... Allen, TX........... August 1, 2012.
82,956J.............. Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc. Round Rock, TX...... August 1, 2012.
82,956K.............. Micron Technology, Inc............. Manassas, VA........ August 1, 2012.
82,956L.............. Micron Technology Puerto Rico, Inc. Aguadilla, PR....... August 1, 2012.
83,132............... Citibank, N.A., Enterprise New York, NY........ October 11, 2012.
Operations & Technology, Citi
Procurement, Randstad, etc.
83,132A.............. Citibank, N.A., Enterprise Tampa, FL........... October 11, 2012.
Operations & Technology, Citi
Procurement, Randstad, etc.
83,160............... AMP--A Fletcher Company, The Pontotoc, MS........ October 21, 2012.
Fletcher-Terry Company, LLC,
Express Personnel Services.
83,171............... Cigna Health and Life Insurance St. Louis, MO....... October 24, 2012.
Company, Provider Data Management
Team, Robert Half and Office
Overload, etc.
83,172............... Decanter Diversified Machine, Inc., Roebuck, SC......... October 24, 2012.
Decanter Machine, Inc., Labor
Ready Mid-Atlantic, etc.
83,215............... Dow Jones & Company, Inc., News Chicopee, MA........ November 8, 2012.
Corporation, Customer Service/Call
Center Support, Aerotek, etc.
83,215A.............. Dow Jones & Company, Inc., News New York, NY........ November 8, 2012.
Corporation, Customer Service/Call
Center Support, Aerotek, etc.
83,215B.............. Dow Jones & Company, Inc., News Princeton, NJ....... November 8, 2012.
Corporation, Customer Service/Call
Center Support, Aerotek, etc.
83,228............... Covidien LP, Medical Devices Argyle, NY.......... December 3, 2013.
Division, Kelly Services.
83,229............... Amphenol Corporation, Aerospace and Sidney, NY.......... December 16, 2013.
Industrial Division, Staffworks,
Adecco, etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 77500]]
Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance
In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the
eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met
for the reasons specified.
The investigation revealed that the criterion under paragraph
(a)(1), or (b)(1), or (c)(1)(employment decline or threat of
separation) of section 222 has not been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
83,105.............. Contact Industries, Inc., Clear Prineville, OR. .............................
Pine Mouldings, Inc., Mid Oregon
Personnel and Select, etc.
83,159.............. Native Accents LLC................ Big Sky, MT. .............................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The investigation revealed that the criteria under
paragraphs(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in
production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not
been met.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W number Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
82,831A............. IBM Corporation, Systems Hopewell Junction, NY. .............................
Technology Group, Packaging
Development, Product Engineering.
82,831B............. IBM Corporation, Enterprise Poughkeepsie, NY. .............................
Systems Tech Support, Systems
Technology, Computer Task Group.
83,057.............. Alpha Wire, Belden Division, Leominster, MA. .............................
Belden, Inc., Mirco Tech
Staffing, Infinity Staffing, etc.
83,122.............. YP Texas Region Yellow Pages LLC, Olivette, MO. .............................
Olivette Telephone Sales
Division, YP Subsidiary Holdings
LLC, etc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
After notice of the petitions was published in the Federal Register
and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act
(19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these
petitions.
The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
83,212.............. HSBC Card Services, Inc., Tulsa, OK. .............................
Bilingual Customer Services
Department.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the petitioning groups of workers are covered by active
certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases
would serve no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be
covered by more than one certification at a time.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
83,062.............. Micron Technology, Inc............ Manassas, VA. .............................
83,089.............. Micron Technology, Inc............ Boise, ID. .............................
83,089A............. Micron Technology, Inc............ Fremont, CA. .............................
83,089B............. Micron Technology, Inc............ San Jose, CA. .............................
83,089C............. Micron Technology, Inc............ Folsom, CA. .............................
83,089D............. Micron Technology, Inc............ Longmont, CO. .............................
83,089E............. Micron Semiconductor Products..... Meridian, ID. .............................
83,089F............. Micron Technology, Inc............ Nampa, ID. .............................
83,089G............. Micron Technology, Inc............ Boise, ID. .............................
83,089H............. Micron Technology, Inc............ Minneapolis, MN. .............................
83,089I............. Micron Technology Texas, LLC...... Allen, TX. .............................
83,089J............. Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc Round Rock, TX. .............................
83,089K............. Micron Technology, Inc............ Manassas, VA. .............................
83,089L............. Micron Technology Puerto Rico, Inc Aguadilla, PR. .............................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following determinations terminating investigations were issued
because the petitions are the subject of ongoing investigations under
petitions filed earlier covering the same petitioners.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TA-W No. Subject firm Location Impact date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
83,251............. AT&T............................. Dallas, TX. ...............................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 77501]]
I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued
during the period of December 2, 2013 through December 6, 2013. These
determinations are available on the Department's Web site tradeact/taa/
taa--search--form.cfm under the searchable listing of determinations or
by calling the Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance toll free at 888-
365-6822.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of December 2013.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2013-30353 Filed 12-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P