Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Small Business Impacts of Motor Vehicle Safety, 76265-76268 [2013-29744]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 17, 2013 / Proposed Rules all intercarrier compensation orders, tariffs, and agreements, and to prohibit intermediate carriers that fail to submit such certifications from carrying longdistance traffic. In addition, the proposal would prohibit other providers from handing off traffic to an intermediate provider that has failed to submit such certifications. Compliance with these reporting obligations may affect small entities, and may include new administrative processes. 56. In the FNPRM, the Commission also proposes to require rural ILECs to periodically report data for all longdistance calls terminating to their OCNs. Compliance with these reporting obligations may affect small entities, and may include new administrative processes. 57. We note parenthetically that, in the FNPRM, the Commission seeks comment on the benefits and burdens of these proposals. wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS E. Steps Taken To Minimize the Significant Economic Impact on Small Entities, and Significant Alternatives Considered 58. The RFA requires an agency to describe any significant, specifically small business, alternatives that it has considered in reaching its proposed approach, which may include the following four alternatives (among others): ‘‘(1) The establishment of differing compliance or reporting requirements or timetables that take into account the resources available to small entities; (2) the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of compliance and reporting requirements under the rules for such small entities; (3) the use of performance rather than design standards; and (4) an exemption from coverage of the rule, or any part thereof, for such small entities.’’ 59. The Commission is aware that some of the proposals under consideration will impact small entities by imposing costs and administrative burdens. For this reason, the FNPRM proposes a number of measures to minimize or eliminate the costs and burdens generated by compliance with the proposed rules. 60. First, with regard to the proposal that covered providers file a separate report that segregates autodialer traffic from other traffic, accompanied by an explanation of the method the provider used to identify the autodialer traffic, only those covered providers with more than 100,000 retail long-distance subscriber lines (business or residential) would be required to retain the basic information on call attempts and to periodically report the summary VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:27 Dec 16, 2013 Jkt 232001 analysis of that information to the Commission. 61. Second, the FNPRM seeks comment on the proposal that the recordkeeping, retention, and reporting requirements adopted in the Order be extended to intermediate providers, and on whether doing so would allow the Commission to reduce or eliminate the burden on covered providers. 62. Third, the FNPRM seeks comment on standards the Commission might use to adopt additional safe harbors in the future in order to reduce or eliminate any burdens associated with compliance with the recordkeeping, retention, and reporting obligations. The FNPRM proposes to adopt a safe harbor based on a provider’s performance in completing long-distance calls to particular rural OCNs, measured against each rural OCNs local call answer rate. 63. Fourth, the FNPRM proposes to exempt smaller rural ILECs from the requirement that rural ILECs periodically report their local call answer rates to the Commission. Each of these proposals could reduce the economic impact on small entities. 64. The Commission expects to consider the economic impact on small entities, as identified in comments filed in response to the FNPRM, in reaching its final conclusions and taking action in this proceeding. The proposed recordkeeping, retention, and reporting requirements in the FNPRM could have an economic impact on both small and large entities. However, the Commission believes that any impact of such requirements is outweighed by the accompanying benefits to the public and to the operation and efficiency of the long distance industry. F. Federal Rules That May Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict With the Proposed Rules 65. None. VI. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, it is ordered that, pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), 201(b), 202(a), 218, 220(a), 251(a), and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 201(b), 202(a), 218, 220(a), 251(a), and 403, the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is adopted. It is further ordered that, pursuant to sections 1.4(b)(1) and 1.103(a) of the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.4(b)(1), 1.103(a), the Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking comments are due on or before January 16, 2014, and reply comments on or before February 18, 2014. It is further ordered that the Commission shall send a copy of this PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 76265 Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to Congress and to the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A). It is further ordered that the Commission’s Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center, shall send a copy of this Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, including the Initial Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. Federal Communications Commission. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2013–29864 Filed 12–16–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 49 CFR Parts 529 Through 578, Except Parts 571 and 575 [Docket No. NHTSA–2013–0116] Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Small Business Impacts of Motor Vehicle Safety National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Notice of regulatory review; Request for comments. AGENCY: NHTSA seeks comments on the economic impact of its regulations on small entities. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, we are attempting to identify rules that may have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. We also request comments on ways to make these regulations easier to read and understand. The focus of this notice is rules that specifically relate to passenger cars, multipurpose passenger vehicles, trucks, buses, trailers, motorcycles, and motor vehicle equipment. SUMMARY: You should submit comments early enough to ensure that Docket Management receives them not later than February 18, 2014. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments [identified by Docket Number NHTSA– 2013–0116] by any of the following methods: • Internet: To submit comments electronically, go to the U.S. Government regulations Web site at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the DATES: E:\FR\FM\17DEP1.SGM 17DEP1 76266 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 17, 2013 / Proposed Rules online instructions for submitting comments. • Mail: Send comments to Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC 20590. • Hand Delivery: If you plan to submit written comments by hand or courier, please do so at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, except federal holidays. • Fax: Written comments may be faxed to 202–493–2251. • You may call Docket Management at 1–800–647–5527. Instructions: For detailed instructions on submitting comments and additional information see the Comments heading of the Supplementary Information section of this document. Note that all comments received will be posted without change to https:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Juanita Kavalauskas, Office of Regulatory Analysis and Evaluation, National Center for Statistics and Analysis, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590 (telephone 202–366–2584, fax 202–366– 3189). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act A. Background and Purpose Section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96–354), as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), requires agencies to conduct periodic reviews of final rules that have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small business entities. The purpose of the reviews is to determine whether such rules should be continued without change, or should be amended or rescinded, consistent with the objectives of applicable statutes, to minimize any significant economic impact of the rules on a substantial number of such small entities. B. Review Schedule On November 24, 2008, NHTSA published in the Federal Register (73 FR 71401) a 10-year review plan for its existing regulations. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA, ‘‘we’’) has divided its rules into 10 groups by subject area. Each group will be reviewed once every 10 years, undergoing a two-stage process— an Analysis Year and a Review Year. For purposes of these reviews, a year will coincide with the fall-to-fall publication schedule of the Semiannual Regulatory Agenda, see https:// www.regulations.gov. Year 1 (2008) begins in the fall of 2008 and ends in the fall of 2009; Year 2 (2009) begins in the fall of 2009 and ends in the fall of 2010; and so on. During the Analysis Year, we will request public comment on and analyze each of the rules in a given year’s group to determine whether any rule has a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities and, thus, requires review in accordance with section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. In each fall’s Regulatory Agenda, we will publish the results of the analyses we completed during the previous year. For rules that have subparts, or other discrete sections of rules that do have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities, we will announce that we will be conducting a formal section 610 review during the following 12 months. The section 610 review will determine whether a specific rule should be revised or revoked to lessen its impact on small entities. We will consider: (1) The continued need for the rule; (2) the nature of complaints or comments received from the public; (3) the complexity of the rule; (4) the extent to which the rule overlaps, duplicates, or conflicts with other federal rules or with state or local government rules; and (5) the length of time since the rule has been evaluated or the degree to which technology, economic conditions, or other factors have changed in the area affected by the rule. At the end of the Review Year, we will publish the results of our review. The following table shows the 10-year analysis and review schedule: NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION SECTION 610 REVIEWS Year 1 .......... 2 .......... 3 .......... 4 .......... 5 .......... 6 .......... 7 .......... 8 .......... 9 .......... 10 ........ Regulations to be reviewed 49 23 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 49 CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR CFR 571.223 through 571.500, and parts 575 and 579 .................................................................. parts 1200 and 1300 ................................................................................................................ parts 501 through 526 and 571.213 ......................................................................................... 571.131, 571.217, 571.220, 571.221, and 571.222 ................................................................. 571.101 through 571.110, and 571.135, 571.138 and 571.139 .............................................. parts 529 through 578, except parts 571 and 575 .................................................................. 571.111 through 571.129 and parts 580 through 588 ............................................................. 571.201 through 571.212 ......................................................................................................... 571.214 through 571.219, except 571.217 .............................................................................. parts 591 through 595 and new parts and subparts ................................................................ wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS C. Regulations Under Analysis During Year 6, we will continue to conduct a preliminary assessment of the following sections of 49 CFR parts 529 through 578, except parts 571 and 575: Section 529 531 533 534 535 536 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... Analysis year Title Manufacturers of Multistage Automobiles. Passenger Automobile Average Fuel Economy. Light Truck Fuel Economy Standards. Rights and Responsibilities of Manufacturers in the Context of Changes in Corporate Relationships. Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicle Fuel Efficiency Program. Transfer and Trading of Fuel Economy Credits. VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:27 Dec 16, 2013 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\17DEP1.SGM 17DEP1 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Review year 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 17, 2013 / Proposed Rules Section ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... 569 570 572 573 574 576 577 578 wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 537 538 541 542 543 545 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 563 564 565 566 567 568 ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... 76267 Title Automotive Fuel Economy Reports. Manufacturing Incentives for Alternative Fuel Vehicles. Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard. Procedures for Selecting Light Duty Truck Lines to be Covered by the Theft Prevention Standard. Exemption from Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard. Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard Phase-In and Small-Volume Line Reporting Requirements. Procedural Rules. Petitions for Rulemaking, Defect, and Noncompliance Orders. Rulemaking Procedures. Standards Enforcement and Defects Investigation. Temporary Exemption from Motor Vehicle Safety and Bumper Standards. Exemption for Inconsequential Defect or Noncompliance. Petitions for Hearings on Notification and Remedy of Defects. Event Data Recorders. Replaceable Light Source and Sealed Beam Headlamp Information. Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) Requirements. Manufacturer Identification. Certification. Vehicles Manufactured in Two or More Stages—All Incomplete, Intermediate and Final-Stage Manufacturers of Vehicles Manufactured in Two or More Stages. Regrooved Tires. Vehicle In Use Inspection Standards. Anthropomorphic Test Devices. Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports. Tire Identification and Recordkeeping. Record Retention. Defect and Noncompliance Notification. Civil and Criminal Penalties. We are seeking comments on whether any requirements in 49 CFR parts 529 through 578, except parts 571 and 575 have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. ‘‘Small entities’’ include small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations under 50,000. Business entities are generally defined as small businesses by Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code, for the purposes of receiving Small Business Administration (SBA) assistance. Size standards established by SBA in 13 CFR 121.201 are expressed either in number of employees or annual receipts in millions of dollars, unless otherwise specified. The number of employees or annual receipts indicates the maximum allowed for a concern and its affiliates to be considered small. If your business or organization is a small entity and if any of the requirements in 49 CFR parts 529 through 578, except parts 571 and 575 have a significant economic impact on your business or organization, please submit a comment to explain how and to what degree these rules affect you, the extent of the economic impact on your business or organization, and why you believe the economic impact is significant. If the agency determines that there is a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities, it VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:27 Dec 16, 2013 Jkt 232001 will ask for comment in a subsequent notice during the Review Year on how these impacts could be reduced without reducing safety. II. Plain Language A. Background and Purpose Executive Order 12866 and the President’s memorandum of June 1, 1998, require each agency to write all rules in plain language. Application of the principles of plain language includes consideration of the following questions: • Have we organized the material to suit the public’s needs? • Are the requirements in the rule clearly stated? • Does the rule contain technical language or jargon that is not clear? • Would a different format (grouping and order of sections, use of headings, paragraphing) make the rule easier to understand? • Would more (but shorter) sections be better? • Could we improve clarity by adding tables, lists, or diagrams? • What else could we do to make the rule easier to understand? If you have any responses to these questions, please include them in your comments on this document. B. Review Schedule In conjunction with our section 610 reviews, we will be performing plain language reviews over a ten-year period on a schedule consistent with the PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 section 610 review schedule. We will review 49 CFR parts 529 through 578, except parts 571 and 575 to determine if these regulations can be reorganized and/or rewritten to make them easier to read, understand, and use. We encourage interested persons to submit draft regulatory language that clearly and simply communicates regulatory requirements, and other recommendations, such as for putting information in tables that may make the regulations easier to use. Comments How do I prepare and submit comments? Your comments must be written and in English. To ensure that your comments are correctly filed in the Docket, please include the docket number of this document in your comments. Your comments must not be more than 15 pages long. (49 CFR 553.21.) We established this limit to encourage you to write your primary comments in a concise fashion. However, you may attach necessary additional documents to your comments. There is no limit on the length of the attachments. Please submit one copy of your comments, including the attachments, to Docket Management at the address given above under ADDRESSES. Please note that pursuant to the Data Quality Act, in order for substantive data to be relied upon and used by the E:\FR\FM\17DEP1.SGM 17DEP1 76268 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 17, 2013 / Proposed Rules agency, it must meet the information quality standards set forth in the OMB and DOT Data Quality Act guidelines. Accordingly, we encourage you to consult the guidelines in preparing your comments. OMB’s guidelines may be accessed at https://www.whitehouse.gov/ omb/fedreg_reproducible. DOT’s guidelines may be accessed at https:// dmses.dot.gov/submit/ DataQualityGuidelines.pdf. Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT’s complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–78) or you may visit https:// www.regulations.gov. How can I be sure that my comments were received? If you wish Docket Management to notify you upon its receipt of your comments, enclose a self-addressed, stamped postcard in the envelope containing your comments. Upon receiving your comments, Docket Management will return the postcard by mail. How do I submit confidential business information? wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS If you wish to submit any information under a claim of confidentiality, you should submit three copies of your complete submission, including the information you claim to be confidential VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:27 Dec 16, 2013 Jkt 232001 business information, to the Chief Counsel, NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. In addition, you should submit a copy, from which you have deleted the claimed confidential business information, to Docket Management at the address given above under ADDRESSES. When you send a comment containing information claimed to be confidential business information, you should include a cover letter setting forth the information specified in our confidential business information regulation. (49 CFR Part 512.) Will the agency consider late comments? We will consider all comments that Docket Management receives before the close of business on the comment closing date indicated above under DATES. To the extent possible, we will also consider comments that Docket Management receives after that date. How can I read the comments submitted by other people? You may read the comments received by Docket Management at the address given above under ADDRESSES. The hours of the Docket are indicated above in the same location. You may also see the comments on the Internet. To read the comments on the Internet, take the following steps: (1) Go to the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) at https:// www.regulations.gov. (2) FDMS provides two basic methods of searching to retrieve dockets and docket materials that are available in the PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 system: (a) ‘‘Quick Search’’ to search using a full-text search engine, or (b) ‘‘Advanced Search,’’ which displays various indexed fields such as the docket name, docket identification number, phase of the action, initiating office, date of issuance, document title, document identification number, type of document, Federal Register reference, CFR citation, etc. Each data field in the advanced search may be searched independently or in combination with other fields, as desired. Each search yields a simultaneous display of all available information found in FDMS that is relevant to the requested subject or topic. (3) You may download the comments. However, since the comments are imaged documents, instead of word processing documents, the ‘‘pdf’’ versions of the documents are word searchable. Please note that even after the comment closing date, we will continue to file relevant information in the Docket as it becomes available. Further, some people may submit late comments. Accordingly, we recommend that you periodically check the Docket for new material. Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30111, 30168; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8. Issued in Washington, DC, on December 10, 2013. Terry Shelton, Associate Administrator for the National Center for Statistics and Analysis. [FR Doc. 2013–29744 Filed 12–16–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–59–P E:\FR\FM\17DEP1.SGM 17DEP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 17, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 76265-76268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-29744]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

49 CFR Parts 529 Through 578, Except Parts 571 and 575

[Docket No. NHTSA-2013-0116]


Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Small Business Impacts of 
Motor Vehicle Safety

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of regulatory review; Request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NHTSA seeks comments on the economic impact of its regulations 
on small entities. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, we 
are attempting to identify rules that may have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. We also request 
comments on ways to make these regulations easier to read and 
understand. The focus of this notice is rules that specifically relate 
to passenger cars, multipurpose passenger vehicles, trucks, buses, 
trailers, motorcycles, and motor vehicle equipment.

DATES: You should submit comments early enough to ensure that Docket 
Management receives them not later than February 18, 2014.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments [identified by Docket Number NHTSA-
2013-0116] by any of the following methods:
     Internet: To submit comments electronically, go to the 
U.S. Government regulations Web site at https://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the

[[Page 76266]]

online instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Management Facility, U.S. 
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building 
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: If you plan to submit written comments by 
hand or courier, please do so at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West 
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC between 9 a.m. and 
5 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, except federal holidays.
     Fax: Written comments may be faxed to 202-493-2251.
     You may call Docket Management at 1-800-647-5527.
    Instructions: For detailed instructions on submitting comments and 
additional information see the Comments heading of the Supplementary 
Information section of this document. Note that all comments received 
will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including 
any personal information provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading 
in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Juanita Kavalauskas, Office of 
Regulatory Analysis and Evaluation, National Center for Statistics and 
Analysis, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. 
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 
DC 20590 (telephone 202-366-2584, fax 202-366-3189).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act

A. Background and Purpose

    Section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-
354), as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness 
Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), requires agencies to conduct periodic 
reviews of final rules that have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small business entities. The purpose of the 
reviews is to determine whether such rules should be continued without 
change, or should be amended or rescinded, consistent with the 
objectives of applicable statutes, to minimize any significant economic 
impact of the rules on a substantial number of such small entities.

B. Review Schedule

    On November 24, 2008, NHTSA published in the Federal Register (73 
FR 71401) a 10-year review plan for its existing regulations. The 
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA, ``we'') has 
divided its rules into 10 groups by subject area. Each group will be 
reviewed once every 10 years, undergoing a two-stage process--an 
Analysis Year and a Review Year. For purposes of these reviews, a year 
will coincide with the fall-to-fall publication schedule of the 
Semiannual Regulatory Agenda, see https://www.regulations.gov. Year 1 
(2008) begins in the fall of 2008 and ends in the fall of 2009; Year 2 
(2009) begins in the fall of 2009 and ends in the fall of 2010; and so 
on.
    During the Analysis Year, we will request public comment on and 
analyze each of the rules in a given year's group to determine whether 
any rule has a significant impact on a substantial number of small 
entities and, thus, requires review in accordance with section 610 of 
the Regulatory Flexibility Act. In each fall's Regulatory Agenda, we 
will publish the results of the analyses we completed during the 
previous year. For rules that have subparts, or other discrete sections 
of rules that do have a significant impact on a substantial number of 
small entities, we will announce that we will be conducting a formal 
section 610 review during the following 12 months.
    The section 610 review will determine whether a specific rule 
should be revised or revoked to lessen its impact on small entities. We 
will consider: (1) The continued need for the rule; (2) the nature of 
complaints or comments received from the public; (3) the complexity of 
the rule; (4) the extent to which the rule overlaps, duplicates, or 
conflicts with other federal rules or with state or local government 
rules; and (5) the length of time since the rule has been evaluated or 
the degree to which technology, economic conditions, or other factors 
have changed in the area affected by the rule. At the end of the Review 
Year, we will publish the results of our review. The following table 
shows the 10-year analysis and review schedule:

   National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Section 610 Reviews
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     Regulations to be
       Year               reviewed         Analysis year    Review year
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1................  49 CFR 571.223                   2008            2009
                    through 571.500, and
                    parts 575 and 579.
2................  23 CFR parts 1200 and            2009            2010
                    1300.
3................  49 CFR parts 501                 2010            2011
                    through 526 and
                    571.213.
4................  49 CFR 571.131,                  2011            2012
                    571.217, 571.220,
                    571.221, and 571.222.
5................  49 CFR 571.101                   2012            2013
                    through 571.110, and
                    571.135, 571.138 and
                    571.139.
6................  49 CFR parts 529                 2013            2014
                    through 578, except
                    parts 571 and 575.
7................  49 CFR 571.111                   2014            2015
                    through 571.129 and
                    parts 580 through
                    588.
8................  49 CFR 571.201                   2015            2016
                    through 571.212.
9................  49 CFR 571.214                   2016            2017
                    through 571.219,
                    except 571.217.
10...............  49 CFR parts 591                 2017            2018
                    through 595 and new
                    parts and subparts.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Regulations Under Analysis

    During Year 6, we will continue to conduct a preliminary assessment 
of the following sections of 49 CFR parts 529 through 578, except parts 
571 and 575:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Section                               Title
------------------------------------------------------------------------
529.................  Manufacturers of Multistage Automobiles.
531.................  Passenger Automobile Average Fuel Economy.
533.................  Light Truck Fuel Economy Standards.
534.................  Rights and Responsibilities of Manufacturers in
                       the Context of Changes in Corporate
                       Relationships.
535.................  Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicle Fuel Efficiency
                       Program.
536.................  Transfer and Trading of Fuel Economy Credits.

[[Page 76267]]

 
537.................  Automotive Fuel Economy Reports.
538.................  Manufacturing Incentives for Alternative Fuel
                       Vehicles.
541.................  Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard.
542.................  Procedures for Selecting Light Duty Truck Lines to
                       be Covered by the Theft Prevention Standard.
543.................  Exemption from Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard.
545.................  Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard
                       Phase-In and Small-Volume Line Reporting
                       Requirements.
551.................  Procedural Rules.
552.................  Petitions for Rulemaking, Defect, and
                       Noncompliance Orders.
553.................  Rulemaking Procedures.
554.................  Standards Enforcement and Defects Investigation.
555.................  Temporary Exemption from Motor Vehicle Safety and
                       Bumper Standards.
556.................  Exemption for Inconsequential Defect or
                       Noncompliance.
557.................  Petitions for Hearings on Notification and Remedy
                       of Defects.
563.................  Event Data Recorders.
564.................  Replaceable Light Source and Sealed Beam Headlamp
                       Information.
565.................  Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) Requirements.
566.................  Manufacturer Identification.
567.................  Certification.
568.................  Vehicles Manufactured in Two or More Stages--All
                       Incomplete, Intermediate and Final-Stage
                       Manufacturers of Vehicles Manufactured in Two or
                       More Stages.
569.................  Regrooved Tires.
570.................  Vehicle In Use Inspection Standards.
572.................  Anthropomorphic Test Devices.
573.................  Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and
                       Reports.
574.................  Tire Identification and Recordkeeping.
576.................  Record Retention.
577.................  Defect and Noncompliance Notification.
578.................  Civil and Criminal Penalties.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We are seeking comments on whether any requirements in 49 CFR parts 
529 through 578, except parts 571 and 575 have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. ``Small entities'' 
include small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are 
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, 
and governmental jurisdictions with populations under 50,000. Business 
entities are generally defined as small businesses by Standard 
Industrial Classification (SIC) code, for the purposes of receiving 
Small Business Administration (SBA) assistance. Size standards 
established by SBA in 13 CFR 121.201 are expressed either in number of 
employees or annual receipts in millions of dollars, unless otherwise 
specified. The number of employees or annual receipts indicates the 
maximum allowed for a concern and its affiliates to be considered 
small. If your business or organization is a small entity and if any of 
the requirements in 49 CFR parts 529 through 578, except parts 571 and 
575 have a significant economic impact on your business or 
organization, please submit a comment to explain how and to what degree 
these rules affect you, the extent of the economic impact on your 
business or organization, and why you believe the economic impact is 
significant.
    If the agency determines that there is a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities, it will ask for 
comment in a subsequent notice during the Review Year on how these 
impacts could be reduced without reducing safety.

II. Plain Language

A. Background and Purpose

    Executive Order 12866 and the President's memorandum of June 1, 
1998, require each agency to write all rules in plain language. 
Application of the principles of plain language includes consideration 
of the following questions:
     Have we organized the material to suit the public's needs?
     Are the requirements in the rule clearly stated?
     Does the rule contain technical language or jargon that is 
not clear?
     Would a different format (grouping and order of sections, 
use of headings, paragraphing) make the rule easier to understand?
     Would more (but shorter) sections be better?
     Could we improve clarity by adding tables, lists, or 
diagrams?
     What else could we do to make the rule easier to 
understand?
    If you have any responses to these questions, please include them 
in your comments on this document.

B. Review Schedule

    In conjunction with our section 610 reviews, we will be performing 
plain language reviews over a ten-year period on a schedule consistent 
with the section 610 review schedule. We will review 49 CFR parts 529 
through 578, except parts 571 and 575 to determine if these regulations 
can be reorganized and/or rewritten to make them easier to read, 
understand, and use. We encourage interested persons to submit draft 
regulatory language that clearly and simply communicates regulatory 
requirements, and other recommendations, such as for putting 
information in tables that may make the regulations easier to use.

Comments

How do I prepare and submit comments?

    Your comments must be written and in English. To ensure that your 
comments are correctly filed in the Docket, please include the docket 
number of this document in your comments.
    Your comments must not be more than 15 pages long. (49 CFR 553.21.) 
We established this limit to encourage you to write your primary 
comments in a concise fashion. However, you may attach necessary 
additional documents to your comments. There is no limit on the length 
of the attachments.
    Please submit one copy of your comments, including the attachments, 
to Docket Management at the address given above under ADDRESSES.
    Please note that pursuant to the Data Quality Act, in order for 
substantive data to be relied upon and used by the

[[Page 76268]]

agency, it must meet the information quality standards set forth in the 
OMB and DOT Data Quality Act guidelines. Accordingly, we encourage you 
to consult the guidelines in preparing your comments. OMB's guidelines 
may be accessed at https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fedreg_reproducible. 
DOT's guidelines may be accessed at https://dmses.dot.gov/submit/DataQualityGuidelines.pdf.
    Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all 
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual 
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf 
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's 
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on 
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or you may visit https://www.regulations.gov.

How can I be sure that my comments were received?

    If you wish Docket Management to notify you upon its receipt of 
your comments, enclose a self-addressed, stamped postcard in the 
envelope containing your comments. Upon receiving your comments, Docket 
Management will return the postcard by mail.

How do I submit confidential business information?

    If you wish to submit any information under a claim of 
confidentiality, you should submit three copies of your complete 
submission, including the information you claim to be confidential 
business information, to the Chief Counsel, NHTSA, U.S. Department of 
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. In 
addition, you should submit a copy, from which you have deleted the 
claimed confidential business information, to Docket Management at the 
address given above under ADDRESSES. When you send a comment containing 
information claimed to be confidential business information, you should 
include a cover letter setting forth the information specified in our 
confidential business information regulation. (49 CFR Part 512.)

Will the agency consider late comments?

    We will consider all comments that Docket Management receives 
before the close of business on the comment closing date indicated 
above under DATES. To the extent possible, we will also consider 
comments that Docket Management receives after that date.

How can I read the comments submitted by other people?

    You may read the comments received by Docket Management at the 
address given above under ADDRESSES. The hours of the Docket are 
indicated above in the same location.
    You may also see the comments on the Internet. To read the comments 
on the Internet, take the following steps:
    (1) Go to the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) at https://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) FDMS provides two basic methods of searching to retrieve 
dockets and docket materials that are available in the system: (a) 
``Quick Search'' to search using a full-text search engine, or (b) 
``Advanced Search,'' which displays various indexed fields such as the 
docket name, docket identification number, phase of the action, 
initiating office, date of issuance, document title, document 
identification number, type of document, Federal Register reference, 
CFR citation, etc. Each data field in the advanced search may be 
searched independently or in combination with other fields, as desired. 
Each search yields a simultaneous display of all available information 
found in FDMS that is relevant to the requested subject or topic.
    (3) You may download the comments. However, since the comments are 
imaged documents, instead of word processing documents, the ``pdf'' 
versions of the documents are word searchable.
    Please note that even after the comment closing date, we will 
continue to file relevant information in the Docket as it becomes 
available. Further, some people may submit late comments. Accordingly, 
we recommend that you periodically check the Docket for new material.

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 30111, 30168; delegation of authority at 
49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 10, 2013.
Terry Shelton,
Associate Administrator for the National Center for Statistics and 
Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2013-29744 Filed 12-16-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.