Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending the NYSE MKT Equities Price List and the NYSE Amex Options Fee Schedule in Order To Provide for Fees for a Lower-Latency 10 Gigabit Liquidity Center Network Connection in the Exchange's Data Center, 74197-74200 [2013-29384]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 10, 2013 / Notices
Institution and settlement of
injunctive actions;
Institution and settlement of
administrative proceedings; an opinion;
and
Other matters relating to enforcement
proceedings.
At times, changes in Commission
priorities require alterations in the
scheduling of meeting items.
For further information and to
ascertain what, if any, matters have been
added, deleted or postponed, please
contact the Office of the Secretary at
(202) 551–5400.
Dated: December 5, 2013.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–29474 Filed 12–6–13; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–70982; File No. SR–
NYSEMKT–2013–97]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Amending the NYSE MKT
Equities Price List and the NYSE Amex
Options Fee Schedule in Order To
Provide for Fees for a Lower-Latency
10 Gigabit Liquidity Center Network
Connection in the Exchange’s Data
Center
December 4, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on
November 20, 2013, NYSE MKT LLC
(the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE MKT’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II and III below, which Items
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
4 The Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) initially approved the Exchange’s
co-location services in Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 62961 (September 21, 2010), 75 FR
59299 (September 27, 2010) (SR–NYSEAmex–2010–
80) (the ‘‘Original Co-location Approval’’). The
Exchange operates a data center in Mahwah, New
Jersey (the ‘‘data center’’) from which it provides
co-location services to Users. The Exchange’s colocation services allow Users to rent space in the
data center so they may locate their electronic
servers in close physical proximity to the
Exchange’s trading and execution system. See id. at
59299.
5 For purposes of the Exchange’s co-location
services, the term ‘‘User’’ includes (i) member
organizations, as that term is defined in the
definitions section of the General and Floor Rules
of the NYSE MKT Equities Rules, and ATP Holders,
as that term is defined in NYSE Amex Options Rule
maindgalligan on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2 15
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:48 Dec 09, 2013
Jkt 232001
have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the
NYSE MKT Equities Price List (‘‘Price
List’’) and the NYSE Amex Options Fee
Schedule (‘‘Fee Schedule’’) in order to
provide for fees for a lower-latency 10
gigabit (‘‘Gb’’) Liquidity Center Network
(‘‘LCN’’) connection in the Exchange’s
data center. The Exchange proposes to
implement the fee change effective
December 3, 2013. The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Web site at www.nyse.com,
at the principal office of the Exchange,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
74197
to provide for fees for a new lowerlatency 10 Gb LCN connection, referred
to as the ‘‘LCN 10 Gb LX,’’ in the
Exchange’s data center, and remove
obsolete text.4 The Exchange proposes
to implement the fee change effective
December 3, 2013.
Users are currently able to purchase
access to the Exchange’s LCN, a local
area network that is available in the data
center and that provides Users with
access to the Exchange’s trading and
execution systems and to the Exchange’s
proprietary market data products.5 LCN
access is currently available in one, 10
and 40 Gb bandwidth capacities,6 for
which Users incur an initial and
monthly fee per connection. The
Exchange also recently submitted a
proposal to expand its co-location
services to include lower-latency LCN
10 Gb LX connections.7 By utilizing
ultra low-latency switches, the LCN 10
Gb LX connection would provide faster
processing of messages sent to it in
comparison to the existing, standard 10
Gb LCN connection.8 The Exchange
proposed to expand its co-location
services to include LCN 10 Gb LX
connections in order to make an
additional service available to its colocation Users and thereby satisfy
demand for more efficient, lower
latency connections. The LCN 10 Gb LX
is expected to have latency levels
similar to those of the existing 40 Gb
LCN connection. Both the proposed
LCN 10 Gb LX connection and the 40 Gb
LCN connection represent the lowest
latency currently available to Users.
The Exchange hereby proposes to
establish the following fees for LCN 10
Gb LX connections:
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the
Price List and the Fee Schedule in order
900.2NY(5); (ii) Sponsored Participants, as that term
is defined in Rule 123B.30(a)(ii)(B)—Equities and
NYSE Amex Options Rule 900.2NY(77); and (iii)
non-member organization and non-ATP Holder
broker-dealers and vendors that request to receive
co-location services directly from the Exchange.
See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
65974 (December 15, 2011), 76 FR 79249 (December
21, 2011) (SR–NYSEAmex–2011–81) and 65975
(December 15, 2011), 76 FR 79233 (December 21,
2011) (SR–NYSEAmex–2011–82). As specified in
the Price List and the Fee Schedule, a User that
incurs co-location fees for a particular co-location
service pursuant thereto would not be subject to colocation fees for the same co-location service
charged by the Exchange’s affiliates New York
Stock Exchange LLC and NYSE Arca, Inc. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70176 (August
13, 2013), 78 FR 50471 (August 19, 2013) (SR–
NYSEMKT–2013–67).
6 See id.
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70886
(November 15, 2013) (SR–NYSEMKT–2013–92).
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Exchange did not propose making low-latency
LCN connections available for 10 Gb CSP
connections because, at least initially, User demand
was not anticipated to exist. Also, the Exchange
noted that, for a 10 Gb LX ‘‘Bundle,’’ SFTI and optic
connections would be at standard 10 Gb latencies
and only the LCN connections would be lower
latency. The Exchange proposes to include language
in the Price List and the Fee Schedule to reflect this
fact. The Exchange’s affiliates have filed
substantially the same proposed rule change to
expand their co-location services to include LCN 10
Gb LX connections. See Securities Exchange Act
Release Nos. 70888 (November 15, 2013) (SR–
NYSE–2013–73) and 70887 (November 15, 2013)
(SR–NYSEArca–2013–123).
8 A switch is a type of network hardware that acts
as the ‘‘gatekeeper’’ for a User’s messaging (e.g.,
orders and quotes) sent to the Exchange’s trading
and execution system from the data center. See SR–
NYSEMKT–2013–92, supra note 7.
E:\FR\FM\10DEN1.SGM
10DEN1
74198
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 10, 2013 / Notices
Description
Amount of charge
LCN Access .......................................................
10 Gb LX Circuit ...............................................
Bundled Network Access, Option 1 (2 LCN
connections, 2 SFTI connections, and 2
optic connections to outside access center).
Bundled Network Access, Option 2 (2 LCN
connections, 2 SFTI connections, 1 optic
connection to outside access center, and 1
optic connection in data center).
Bundled Network Access, Option 3 (2 LCN
connections, 2 SFTI connections, and 2
optic connections in data center).
10 Gb LX Bundle (LCN connections at 10 Gb
LX; SFTI and optic connections at standard
10 Gb).
10 Gb LX Bundle (LCN connections at 10 Gb
LX; SFTI and optic connections at standard
10 Gb).
$15,000 per connection initial charge plus
$20,000 monthly per connection.
$60,000 initial charge plus $64,500 monthly
charge.
10 Gb LX Bundle (LCN connections at 10 Gb
LX; SFTI and optic connections at standard
10 Gb).
$60,000 initial charge plus $77,500 monthly
charge.
As with the pricing for existing LCN
connections, Users of the LCN 10 Gb LX
connections would be subject to an
initial charge plus a monthly recurring
charge per connection. However, in
order to incentivize Users to upgrade to
the proposed LCN 10 Gb LX
connections, the Exchange proposes that
a User that submits a written order for
an LCN 10 Gb LX Circuit or 10 Gb LX
Bundle between December 3, 2013 and
January 31, 2014 would not be subject
to the portion of the initial charge
related to the LCN 10 Gb LX
connections.9
As is the case with all Exchange colocation arrangements, (i) neither a User
nor any of the User’s customers would
be permitted to submit orders directly to
the Exchange unless such User or
customer is a member organization, an
ATP Holder, a Sponsored Participant or
an agent thereof (e.g., a service bureau
providing order entry services); (ii) use
of the co-location services proposed
herein would be completely voluntary
and available to all Users on a nondiscriminatory basis; 10 and (iii) a User
would only incur one charge for the
particular co-location service described
herein, regardless of whether the User
connects only to the Exchange or to the
maindgalligan on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Type of service
Exchange and one or both of its
affiliates.11
Finally, the Exchange proposes to
revise the Price List and the Fee
Schedule to remove obsolete text. More
specifically, a User that submitted a
written order for a 40 Gb LCN circuit
between September 3, 2013 and
September 30, 2013 was not subject to
the portion of the initial charge related
to the LCN connection.12 The Exchange
proposes to delete text that refers to
such period, as it has since expired.
The proposed change is not otherwise
intended to address any other issues
relating to co-location services and/or
related fees, and the Exchange is not
aware of any problems that Users would
have in complying with the proposed
change.
installation and ongoing monitoring,
support and maintenance of such
services.
The Exchange further believes that the
proposed change is reasonable because
the proposed fees relate to the level of
services provided by the Exchange and,
in turn, received by the User. The fees
proposed for LCN 10 Gb LX connections
would be the same as the fees for 40 Gb
LCN connections. The Exchange notes
that it will incur the same costs related
to a User with an LCN 10 Gb LX
connection as it does related to a 40 Gb
LCN connection, largely due to the cost
of the ultra-low latency switches.
Accordingly, the Exchange believes that
it is reasonable to assess the same fees
for both services. The LCN 10 Gb LX
connection and the 40 Gb LCN
connection represent the lowest latency
currently available to Users. The 40 Gb
LCN provides the greatest bandwidth
available on the Exchange, which is
important for Users that have high order
flow and ingest large amounts of market
data and demand the greatest
bandwidth possible to handle such
message flow. Some Users, however,
have systems that are not compatible
with a 40 Gb LCN connection, or do not
have bandwidth demands that would
require a 40 Gb LCN connection, but
still put a premium on reducing latency.
The LCN 10 Gb LX is designed to meet
this demand. The Exchange believes
that this supports a finding that the
proposed pricing is reasonable.
The Exchange also believes that not
charging the initial charge to a User that
submits a written order for an LCN 10
Gb LX Circuit or LCN 10 Gb LX Bundle
between December 3, 2013 and January
31, 2014 is reasonable because the
Exchange believes it will incentivize
Users to upgrade to low-latency
connections during the first two months
that they are available, which will assist
Users in meeting the growing needs of
their business operations. The Exchange
notes that when introducing the 40 Gb
9 For a Bundle, this would mean that a User
would not be subject to the $30,000 LCN 10 Gb LX
portion of the initial charge. The Exchange notes
that each 10 Gb LX Bundle would include two LCN
10 Gb LX connections. The initial charge proposed
for a non-Bundled LCN 10 Gb LX Circuit is $15,000.
Therefore, the LCN 10 Gb LX portion of the initial
Bundle charge would be $30,000. A User would
remain subject to the remaining $30,000 non-LCN
10 Gb LX portion of the initial Bundle charge, i.e.
for SFTI and optic connections.
10 As is currently the case, Users that receive colocation services from the Exchange will not receive
any means of access to the Exchange’s trading and
execution systems that is separate from, or superior
to, that of other Users. In this regard, all orders sent
to the Exchange enter the Exchange’s trading and
execution systems through the same order gateway,
regardless of whether the sender is co-located in the
data center or not. In addition, co-located Users do
not receive any market data or data service product
that is not available to all Users, although Users that
receive co-location services normally would expect
reduced latencies in sending orders to, and
receiving market data from, the Exchange.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:49 Dec 09, 2013
Jkt 232001
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act,13 in general, and
furthers the objectives of Sections
6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,14 in
particular, because it provides for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among its
members, issuers and other persons
using its facilities and does not unfairly
discriminate between customers,
issuers, brokers or dealers.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed change is reasonable because
the Exchange proposes to offer the
additional services described herein
(i.e., the LCN 10 Gb LX connection) as
a convenience to Users, but in doing so
will incur certain costs, including costs
related to the data center facility,
hardware and equipment and costs
related to personnel required for initial
11 See SR–NYSEMKT–2013–67, supra note 5 at
50471. The Exchange’s affiliates have also
submitted the same proposed rule change to
provide for fees for LCN 10 Gb LX connections. See
SR–NYSE–2013–77 and SR–NYSEArca–2013–131.
12 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70285
(August 29, 2013), 78 FR 54697 (September 5, 2013)
(SR–NYSEMKT–2013–71).
13 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
14 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
$60,000 initial charge plus $71,000 monthly
charge.
E:\FR\FM\10DEN1.SGM
10DEN1
maindgalligan on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 10, 2013 / Notices
LCN connection it also did not charge
the initial charge for a limited period.15
As with fees for existing co-location
services, the fees proposed herein
would be charged only to those Users
that voluntarily select the related
services, which would be available to all
Users. Accordingly, the Exchange
believes that the proposed change is
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory. Furthermore, the
Exchange believes that the services and
fees proposed herein are not unfairly
discriminatory and are equitably
allocated because, in addition to the
services being completely voluntary,
they are available to all Users on an
equal basis (i.e., the same products and
services are available to all Users).
Additionally, the Exchange believes that
the proposed fees are not unfairly
discriminatory because, depending on
preference or hardware configurations, a
User whose system is not compatible
with a 40 Gb LCN connection, or does
not have bandwidth demands that
would require a 40 Gb LCN connection,
but that puts a premium on reducing
latency would be able to choose
between the LCN 10 Gb LX connection
or the existing 40 Gb LCN connection to
achieve comparable overall latency
levels and would be charged the same
fees regardless of connection type
chosen.
The Exchange also believes that it is
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to not charge the initial
charge to a User that submits a written
order for an LCN 10 Gb LX Circuit or 10
Gb LCN Bundle between December 3,
2013 and January 31, 2014 because not
charging such fee will incentivize Users
to upgrade to low-latency connections
during the first two months that they are
available, which will assist Users in
meeting the growing needs of their
business operations. In this regard, all
Users would have the option to submit
a written order for an LCN 10 Gb LX
Circuit or LCN 10 Gb LX Bundle and,
if done so between December 3, 2013
and January 31, 2014, any such User
would not be charged the initial charge
related thereto.
The Exchange also believes that the
removal of the text stating that a User
that submitted a written order for a 40
Gb LCN circuit between September 3,
2013 and September 30, 2013 was not
subject to the portion of the initial
charge related to the LCN connection is
reasonable, equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because it would result
in the removal of obsolete text from the
Price List and the Fee Schedule and add
15 See
supra note 12.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:48 Dec 09, 2013
Jkt 232001
74199
greater clarity regarding the applicable
fees.
For the reasons above, the proposed
change would not unfairly discriminate
between or among market participants
that are otherwise capable of satisfying
any applicable co-location fees,
requirements, terms and conditions
established from time to time by the
Exchange.
Finally, the Exchange believes that it
is subject to significant competitive
forces, as described below in the
Exchange’s statement regarding the
burden on competition.
For these reasons, the Exchange
believes that the proposal is consistent
with the Act.
Finally, the Exchange notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market
in which market participants can
readily favor competing venues if they
deem fee levels at a particular venue to
be excessive. In such an environment,
the Exchange must continually review,
and consider adjusting, its fees and
credits to remain competitive with other
exchanges. For the reasons described
above, the Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change reflects this
competitive environment.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of
the Act,16 the Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change would not impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act because any
market participants that are otherwise
capable of satisfying any applicable colocation fees, requirements, terms and
conditions established from time to time
by the Exchange could have access to
the co-location services provided in the
data center. This is also true because, in
addition to the services being
completely voluntary, they are available
to all Users on an equal basis (i.e., the
same range of products and services are
available to all Users).
The Exchange also believes that the
proposed LCN 10 Gb LX connection fees
will not impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act because LCN 10 Gb
LX connections will satisfy User
demand for more efficient, lowerlatency connections, but Users that do
not require the lower latency could
continue to request an existing LCN
connection and pay the corresponding
fees. Additionally, the Exchange
believes that the proposed change will
enhance competition between
competing marketplaces by enabling the
Exchange to provide a low-latency
connectivity option to Users that is
similar to a service available on other
markets. For example, The NASDAQ
Stock Market LLC (‘‘NASDAQ’’) also
makes a low-latency 10 Gb fiber
connection option available to users of
its co-location facilities.17
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
16 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
NASDAQ Rule 7034. NASDAQ refers to
this connectivity option as the ‘‘10 Gb Ultra’’
connection. See also Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 70129 (August 7, 2013), 78 FR 49308
(August 13, 2013) (SR–NASDAQ–2013–099).
17 See
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective
upon filing pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) 18 of the Act and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 19
thereunder, because it establishes a due,
fee, or other charge imposed by the
Exchange.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 20 of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSEMKT–2013–97 on the subject line.
18 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
20 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
19 17
E:\FR\FM\10DEN1.SGM
10DEN1
74200
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 10, 2013 / Notices
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEMKT–2013–97. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–
NYSEMKT–2013–97 and should be
submitted on or before December 31,
2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.21
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–29384 Filed 12–9–13; 8:45 am]
maindgalligan on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–70979; File No. SR–NYSE–
2013–77]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change Amending Its
Price List in Order To Provide for Fees
for a Lower-Latency 10 Gigabit
Liquidity Center Network Connection
in the Exchange’s Data Center
December 4, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on
November 20, 2013, New York Stock
Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or the
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II and III
below, which Items have been prepared
by the self-regulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its
Price List in order to provide for fees for
a lower-latency 10 gigabit (‘‘Gb’’)
Liquidity Center Network (‘‘LCN’’)
connection in the Exchange’s data
center. The Exchange proposes to
implement the fee change effective
December 3, 2013. The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Web site at www.nyse.com,
at the principal office of the Exchange,
and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2 15
21 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:48 Dec 09, 2013
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its
Price List in order to provide for fees for
a new lower-latency 10 Gb LCN
connection, referred to as the ‘‘LCN 10
Gb LX,’’ in the Exchange’s data center,
and remove obsolete text.4 The
Exchange proposes to implement the fee
change effective December 3, 2013.
Users are currently able to purchase
access to the Exchange’s LCN, a local
area network that is available in the data
center and that provides Users with
access to the Exchange’s trading and
execution systems and to the Exchange’s
proprietary market data products.5 LCN
access is currently available in one, 10
and 40 Gb bandwidth capacities,6 for
which Users incur an initial and
monthly fee per connection. The
Exchange also recently submitted a
proposal to expand its co-location
services to include lower-latency LCN
10 Gb LX connections.7 By utilizing
4 The Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) initially approved the Exchange’s
co-location services in Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 62960 (September 21, 2010), 75 FR
59310 (September 27, 2010) (SR–NYSE–2010–56)
(the ‘‘Original Co-location Approval’’). The
Exchange operates a data center in Mahwah, New
Jersey (the ‘‘data center’’) from which it provides
co-location services to Users. The Exchange’s colocation services allow Users to rent space in the
data center so they may locate their electronic
servers in close physical proximity to the
Exchange’s trading and execution system. See id. at
59310.
5 For purposes of the Exchange’s co-location
services, the term ‘‘User’’ includes (i) member
organizations, as that term is defined in NYSE Rule
2(b); (ii) Sponsored Participants, as that term is
defined in NYSE Rule 123B.30(a)(ii)(B); and (iii)
non-member organization broker-dealers and
vendors that request to receive co-location services
directly from the Exchange. See, e.g., Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 65973 (December 15,
2011), 76 FR 79232 (December 21, 2011) (SR–
NYSE–2011–53). As specified in the Price List, a
User that incurs co-location fees for a particular colocation service pursuant thereto would not be
subject to co-location fees for the same co-location
service charged by the Exchange’s affiliates NYSE
MKT LLC and NYSE Arca, Inc. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 70206 (August 15, 2013),
78 FR 51765 (August 21, 2013) (SR–NYSE–2013–
59).
6 See id.
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70888
(November 15, 2013) (SR–NYSE–2013–73). The
Exchange did not propose making low-latency LCN
connections available for 10 Gb CSP connections
because, at least initially, User demand was not
anticipated to exist. Also, the Exchange noted that,
for a 10 Gb LX ‘‘Bundle,’’ SFTI and optic
connections would be at standard 10 Gb latencies
and only the LCN connections would be lower
latency. The Exchange proposes to include language
in the Price List to reflect this fact. The Exchange’s
affiliates have filed substantially the same proposed
rule change to expand their co-location services to
include LCN 10 Gb LX connections. See Securities
E:\FR\FM\10DEN1.SGM
10DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 237 (Tuesday, December 10, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74197-74200]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-29384]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-70982; File No. SR-NYSEMKT-2013-97]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending the NYSE MKT
Equities Price List and the NYSE Amex Options Fee Schedule in Order To
Provide for Fees for a Lower-Latency 10 Gigabit Liquidity Center
Network Connection in the Exchange's Data Center
December 4, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on November 20, 2013, NYSE MKT LLC (the ``Exchange'' or
``NYSE MKT'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE MKT Equities Price List
(``Price List'') and the NYSE Amex Options Fee Schedule (``Fee
Schedule'') in order to provide for fees for a lower-latency 10 gigabit
(``Gb'') Liquidity Center Network (``LCN'') connection in the
Exchange's data center. The Exchange proposes to implement the fee
change effective December 3, 2013. The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the Price List and the Fee Schedule
in order to provide for fees for a new lower-latency 10 Gb LCN
connection, referred to as the ``LCN 10 Gb LX,'' in the Exchange's data
center, and remove obsolete text.\4\ The Exchange proposes to implement
the fee change effective December 3, 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'')
initially approved the Exchange's co-location services in Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 62961 (September 21, 2010), 75 FR 59299
(September 27, 2010) (SR-NYSEAmex-2010-80) (the ``Original Co-
location Approval''). The Exchange operates a data center in Mahwah,
New Jersey (the ``data center'') from which it provides co-location
services to Users. The Exchange's co-location services allow Users
to rent space in the data center so they may locate their electronic
servers in close physical proximity to the Exchange's trading and
execution system. See id. at 59299.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Users are currently able to purchase access to the Exchange's LCN,
a local area network that is available in the data center and that
provides Users with access to the Exchange's trading and execution
systems and to the Exchange's proprietary market data products.\5\ LCN
access is currently available in one, 10 and 40 Gb bandwidth
capacities,\6\ for which Users incur an initial and monthly fee per
connection. The Exchange also recently submitted a proposal to expand
its co-location services to include lower-latency LCN 10 Gb LX
connections.\7\ By utilizing ultra low-latency switches, the LCN 10 Gb
LX connection would provide faster processing of messages sent to it in
comparison to the existing, standard 10 Gb LCN connection.\8\ The
Exchange proposed to expand its co-location services to include LCN 10
Gb LX connections in order to make an additional service available to
its co-location Users and thereby satisfy demand for more efficient,
lower latency connections. The LCN 10 Gb LX is expected to have latency
levels similar to those of the existing 40 Gb LCN connection. Both the
proposed LCN 10 Gb LX connection and the 40 Gb LCN connection represent
the lowest latency currently available to Users.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ For purposes of the Exchange's co-location services, the
term ``User'' includes (i) member organizations, as that term is
defined in the definitions section of the General and Floor Rules of
the NYSE MKT Equities Rules, and ATP Holders, as that term is
defined in NYSE Amex Options Rule 900.2NY(5); (ii) Sponsored
Participants, as that term is defined in Rule 123B.30(a)(ii)(B)--
Equities and NYSE Amex Options Rule 900.2NY(77); and (iii) non-
member organization and non-ATP Holder broker-dealers and vendors
that request to receive co-location services directly from the
Exchange. See, e.g., Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 65974
(December 15, 2011), 76 FR 79249 (December 21, 2011) (SR-NYSEAmex-
2011-81) and 65975 (December 15, 2011), 76 FR 79233 (December 21,
2011) (SR-NYSEAmex-2011-82). As specified in the Price List and the
Fee Schedule, a User that incurs co-location fees for a particular
co-location service pursuant thereto would not be subject to co-
location fees for the same co-location service charged by the
Exchange's affiliates New York Stock Exchange LLC and NYSE Arca,
Inc. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70176 (August 13,
2013), 78 FR 50471 (August 19, 2013) (SR-NYSEMKT-2013-67).
\6\ See id.
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70886 (November 15,
2013) (SR-NYSEMKT-2013-92). The Exchange did not propose making low-
latency LCN connections available for 10 Gb CSP connections because,
at least initially, User demand was not anticipated to exist. Also,
the Exchange noted that, for a 10 Gb LX ``Bundle,'' SFTI and optic
connections would be at standard 10 Gb latencies and only the LCN
connections would be lower latency. The Exchange proposes to include
language in the Price List and the Fee Schedule to reflect this
fact. The Exchange's affiliates have filed substantially the same
proposed rule change to expand their co-location services to include
LCN 10 Gb LX connections. See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
70888 (November 15, 2013) (SR-NYSE-2013-73) and 70887 (November 15,
2013) (SR-NYSEArca-2013-123).
\8\ A switch is a type of network hardware that acts as the
``gatekeeper'' for a User's messaging (e.g., orders and quotes) sent
to the Exchange's trading and execution system from the data center.
See SR-NYSEMKT-2013-92, supra note 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange hereby proposes to establish the following fees for
LCN 10 Gb LX connections:
[[Page 74198]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Type of service Description Amount of charge
------------------------------------------------------------------------
LCN Access...................... 10 Gb LX Circuit.. $15,000 per
connection
initial charge
plus $20,000
monthly per
connection.
Bundled Network Access, Option 1 10 Gb LX Bundle $60,000 initial
(2 LCN connections, 2 SFTI (LCN connections charge plus
connections, and 2 optic at 10 Gb LX; SFTI $64,500 monthly
connections to outside access and optic charge.
center). connections at
standard 10 Gb).
Bundled Network Access, Option 2 10 Gb LX Bundle $60,000 initial
(2 LCN connections, 2 SFTI (LCN connections charge plus
connections, 1 optic connection at 10 Gb LX; SFTI $71,000 monthly
to outside access center, and 1 and optic charge.
optic connection in data connections at
center). standard 10 Gb).
Bundled Network Access, Option 3 10 Gb LX Bundle $60,000 initial
(2 LCN connections, 2 SFTI (LCN connections charge plus
connections, and 2 optic at 10 Gb LX; SFTI $77,500 monthly
connections in data center). and optic charge.
connections at
standard 10 Gb).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
As with the pricing for existing LCN connections, Users of the LCN
10 Gb LX connections would be subject to an initial charge plus a
monthly recurring charge per connection. However, in order to
incentivize Users to upgrade to the proposed LCN 10 Gb LX connections,
the Exchange proposes that a User that submits a written order for an
LCN 10 Gb LX Circuit or 10 Gb LX Bundle between December 3, 2013 and
January 31, 2014 would not be subject to the portion of the initial
charge related to the LCN 10 Gb LX connections.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ For a Bundle, this would mean that a User would not be
subject to the $30,000 LCN 10 Gb LX portion of the initial charge.
The Exchange notes that each 10 Gb LX Bundle would include two LCN
10 Gb LX connections. The initial charge proposed for a non-Bundled
LCN 10 Gb LX Circuit is $15,000. Therefore, the LCN 10 Gb LX portion
of the initial Bundle charge would be $30,000. A User would remain
subject to the remaining $30,000 non-LCN 10 Gb LX portion of the
initial Bundle charge, i.e. for SFTI and optic connections.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As is the case with all Exchange co-location arrangements, (i)
neither a User nor any of the User's customers would be permitted to
submit orders directly to the Exchange unless such User or customer is
a member organization, an ATP Holder, a Sponsored Participant or an
agent thereof (e.g., a service bureau providing order entry services);
(ii) use of the co-location services proposed herein would be
completely voluntary and available to all Users on a non-discriminatory
basis; \10\ and (iii) a User would only incur one charge for the
particular co-location service described herein, regardless of whether
the User connects only to the Exchange or to the Exchange and one or
both of its affiliates.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ As is currently the case, Users that receive co-location
services from the Exchange will not receive any means of access to
the Exchange's trading and execution systems that is separate from,
or superior to, that of other Users. In this regard, all orders sent
to the Exchange enter the Exchange's trading and execution systems
through the same order gateway, regardless of whether the sender is
co-located in the data center or not. In addition, co-located Users
do not receive any market data or data service product that is not
available to all Users, although Users that receive co-location
services normally would expect reduced latencies in sending orders
to, and receiving market data from, the Exchange.
\11\ See SR-NYSEMKT-2013-67, supra note 5 at 50471. The
Exchange's affiliates have also submitted the same proposed rule
change to provide for fees for LCN 10 Gb LX connections. See SR-
NYSE-2013-77 and SR-NYSEArca-2013-131.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the Exchange proposes to revise the Price List and the Fee
Schedule to remove obsolete text. More specifically, a User that
submitted a written order for a 40 Gb LCN circuit between September 3,
2013 and September 30, 2013 was not subject to the portion of the
initial charge related to the LCN connection.\12\ The Exchange proposes
to delete text that refers to such period, as it has since expired.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70285 (August 29,
2013), 78 FR 54697 (September 5, 2013) (SR-NYSEMKT-2013-71).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed change is not otherwise intended to address any other
issues relating to co-location services and/or related fees, and the
Exchange is not aware of any problems that Users would have in
complying with the proposed change.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\13\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\14\ in
particular, because it provides for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and
other persons using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate
between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed change is reasonable
because the Exchange proposes to offer the additional services
described herein (i.e., the LCN 10 Gb LX connection) as a convenience
to Users, but in doing so will incur certain costs, including costs
related to the data center facility, hardware and equipment and costs
related to personnel required for initial installation and ongoing
monitoring, support and maintenance of such services.
The Exchange further believes that the proposed change is
reasonable because the proposed fees relate to the level of services
provided by the Exchange and, in turn, received by the User. The fees
proposed for LCN 10 Gb LX connections would be the same as the fees for
40 Gb LCN connections. The Exchange notes that it will incur the same
costs related to a User with an LCN 10 Gb LX connection as it does
related to a 40 Gb LCN connection, largely due to the cost of the
ultra-low latency switches. Accordingly, the Exchange believes that it
is reasonable to assess the same fees for both services. The LCN 10 Gb
LX connection and the 40 Gb LCN connection represent the lowest latency
currently available to Users. The 40 Gb LCN provides the greatest
bandwidth available on the Exchange, which is important for Users that
have high order flow and ingest large amounts of market data and demand
the greatest bandwidth possible to handle such message flow. Some
Users, however, have systems that are not compatible with a 40 Gb LCN
connection, or do not have bandwidth demands that would require a 40 Gb
LCN connection, but still put a premium on reducing latency. The LCN 10
Gb LX is designed to meet this demand. The Exchange believes that this
supports a finding that the proposed pricing is reasonable.
The Exchange also believes that not charging the initial charge to
a User that submits a written order for an LCN 10 Gb LX Circuit or LCN
10 Gb LX Bundle between December 3, 2013 and January 31, 2014 is
reasonable because the Exchange believes it will incentivize Users to
upgrade to low-latency connections during the first two months that
they are available, which will assist Users in meeting the growing
needs of their business operations. The Exchange notes that when
introducing the 40 Gb
[[Page 74199]]
LCN connection it also did not charge the initial charge for a limited
period.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See supra note 12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As with fees for existing co-location services, the fees proposed
herein would be charged only to those Users that voluntarily select the
related services, which would be available to all Users. Accordingly,
the Exchange believes that the proposed change is equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory. Furthermore, the Exchange believes that the
services and fees proposed herein are not unfairly discriminatory and
are equitably allocated because, in addition to the services being
completely voluntary, they are available to all Users on an equal basis
(i.e., the same products and services are available to all Users).
Additionally, the Exchange believes that the proposed fees are not
unfairly discriminatory because, depending on preference or hardware
configurations, a User whose system is not compatible with a 40 Gb LCN
connection, or does not have bandwidth demands that would require a 40
Gb LCN connection, but that puts a premium on reducing latency would be
able to choose between the LCN 10 Gb LX connection or the existing 40
Gb LCN connection to achieve comparable overall latency levels and
would be charged the same fees regardless of connection type chosen.
The Exchange also believes that it is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to not charge the initial charge to a User that submits
a written order for an LCN 10 Gb LX Circuit or 10 Gb LCN Bundle between
December 3, 2013 and January 31, 2014 because not charging such fee
will incentivize Users to upgrade to low-latency connections during the
first two months that they are available, which will assist Users in
meeting the growing needs of their business operations. In this regard,
all Users would have the option to submit a written order for an LCN 10
Gb LX Circuit or LCN 10 Gb LX Bundle and, if done so between December
3, 2013 and January 31, 2014, any such User would not be charged the
initial charge related thereto.
The Exchange also believes that the removal of the text stating
that a User that submitted a written order for a 40 Gb LCN circuit
between September 3, 2013 and September 30, 2013 was not subject to the
portion of the initial charge related to the LCN connection is
reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because it would
result in the removal of obsolete text from the Price List and the Fee
Schedule and add greater clarity regarding the applicable fees.
For the reasons above, the proposed change would not unfairly
discriminate between or among market participants that are otherwise
capable of satisfying any applicable co-location fees, requirements,
terms and conditions established from time to time by the Exchange.
Finally, the Exchange believes that it is subject to significant
competitive forces, as described below in the Exchange's statement
regarding the burden on competition.
For these reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal is
consistent with the Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\16\ the Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change would not impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act because any market participants that are otherwise
capable of satisfying any applicable co-location fees, requirements,
terms and conditions established from time to time by the Exchange
could have access to the co-location services provided in the data
center. This is also true because, in addition to the services being
completely voluntary, they are available to all Users on an equal basis
(i.e., the same range of products and services are available to all
Users).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also believes that the proposed LCN 10 Gb LX
connection fees will not impose any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act
because LCN 10 Gb LX connections will satisfy User demand for more
efficient, lower-latency connections, but Users that do not require the
lower latency could continue to request an existing LCN connection and
pay the corresponding fees. Additionally, the Exchange believes that
the proposed change will enhance competition between competing
marketplaces by enabling the Exchange to provide a low-latency
connectivity option to Users that is similar to a service available on
other markets. For example, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``NASDAQ'')
also makes a low-latency 10 Gb fiber connection option available to
users of its co-location facilities.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See NASDAQ Rule 7034. NASDAQ refers to this connectivity
option as the ``10 Gb Ultra'' connection. See also Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 70129 (August 7, 2013), 78 FR 49308 (August
13, 2013) (SR-NASDAQ-2013-099).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the Exchange notes that it operates in a highly
competitive market in which market participants can readily favor
competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be
excessive. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually
review, and consider adjusting, its fees and credits to remain
competitive with other exchanges. For the reasons described above, the
Exchange believes that the proposed rule change reflects this
competitive environment.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \18\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule
19b-4 \19\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other
charge imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\19\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \20\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2013-97 on the subject line.
[[Page 74200]]
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2013-97. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2013-97 and should
be submitted on or before December 31, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-29384 Filed 12-9-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P