Certain Opaque Polymers; Notice of Commission Decision Amending the Complaint and Notice of Investigation, 71643 [2013-28708]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 230 / Friday, November 29, 2013 / Notices INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–883] Certain Opaque Polymers; Notice of Commission Decision Amending the Complaint and Notice of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 8) amending the complaint and notice of investigation in the above-captioned investigation. The amended complaint and notice of investigation add a new claim of trade secret misappropriation against the respondents. SUMMARY: sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–2532. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on June 21, 2013, based on a complaint filed by the Dow Chemical Company of Midland, Michigan, and by Rohm and Haas Company and Rohm and Haas Chemicals LLC, both of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 78 FR 37571 (June 21, 2013). The complaint alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 19 U.S.C. 1337, by reason of the infringement of certain claims from four United States Patents. The notice of institution named five respondents: Organik Kimya Sa. ve Tic. A.S of Istanbul, Turkey; Organik Kimya ¸ Netherlands B.V. of Rotterdam-Botlek, Netherlands; Organik Kimya US, Inc. of Burlington, Massachusetts; Turk VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:56 Nov 27, 2013 Jkt 232001 International LLC of Aptos, California; and Aalborz Chemical LLC d/b/a All Chem of Grand Rapids, Michigan. On October 17, 2013, the complainants moved to amend the complaint and notice of investigation to add a new claim of trade secret misappropriation against the respondents. On October 28, 2013, the respondents opposed the motion, and on October 30, 2013, the complainants filed a motion for leave to file an attached reply. On November 7, 2013, the ALJ granted the motion as an ID. Order No. 8. No petitions for review of the ID were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in sections 210.14 and 210.42 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.14, 210.42). By order of the Commission. Issued: November 25, 2013. Lisa R. Barton, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2013–28708 Filed 11–27–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–853] Certain Wireless Consumer Electronics Devices and Components Thereof; Commission Determination To Review in Part A Final Initial Determination Finding No Violation of Section 337; Extension of Target Date U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to review in part the presiding administrate law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) final initial determination (‘‘ID’’) finding no violation of Section 337 in the abovereferenced investigation. The Commission has also determined to extend the target date for completion of this investigation to January 29, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Megan M. Valentine, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–2301. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 71643 hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on August 24, 2012, based on a complaint filed by Technology Properties Limited LLC and Phoenix Digital Solutions LLC, both of Cupertino, California; and Patriot Scientific Corporation of Carlsbad, California (collectively ‘‘Complainants’’). 77 FR 51572–573 (August 24, 2012). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section 337’’), in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain wireless consumer electronics devices and components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 5,809,336 (‘‘the ’336 patent’’). The Commission’s notice of investigation named the following as respondents: Acer, Inc. of Taipei, Taiwan and Acer America Corporation of San Jose, California (collectively ‘‘Acer’’); Amazon.com, Inc. of Seattle, Washington (‘‘Amazon’’); Barnes and Noble, Inc. of New York, New York (‘‘B&N’’); Garmin Ltd of Schaffhausen, Switzerland, Garmin International, Inc. of Olathe, Kansas, and Garmin USA, Inc. of Olathe, Kansas (collectively ‘‘Garmin’’); HTC Corporation of Taoyuan, Taiwan and HTC America of Bellevue, Washington (collectively ‘‘HTC’’); Huawei Technologies Co, Ltd. of Shenzhen, China (‘‘Huawei Tech.’’); Huawei North America of Plano, Texas (‘‘Huawei NA’’); Kyocera Corporation of Kyoto, Japan and Kyocera Communications, Inc. of San Diego, California (collectively ‘‘Kyocera’’); LG Electronics, Inc. of Seoul, Korea and LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (collectively ‘‘LG’’); Nintendo Co. Ltd. of Kyoto, Japan and Nintendo of America, Inc. of Redmond, Washington (collectively ‘‘Nintendo’’); Novatel Wireless, Inc. of San Diego, California (‘‘Novatel’’); Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., of Seoul, Korea E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM 29NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 230 (Friday, November 29, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 71643]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28708]



[[Page 71643]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-883]


Certain Opaque Polymers; Notice of Commission Decision Amending 
the Complaint and Notice of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative 
law judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 8) 
amending the complaint and notice of investigation in the above-
captioned investigation. The amended complaint and notice of 
investigation add a new claim of trade secret misappropriation against 
the respondents.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sidney A. Rosenzweig, Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2532. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission 
may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed 
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. 
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter 
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 
205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on June 21, 2013, based on a complaint filed by the Dow Chemical 
Company of Midland, Michigan, and by Rohm and Haas Company and Rohm and 
Haas Chemicals LLC, both of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 78 FR 37571 
(June 21, 2013). The complaint alleged violations of section 337 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 19 U.S.C. 1337, by reason of the 
infringement of certain claims from four United States Patents. The 
notice of institution named five respondents: Organik Kimya Sa. ve Tic. 
A.[Scedil] of Istanbul, Turkey; Organik Kimya Netherlands B.V. of 
Rotterdam-Botlek, Netherlands; Organik Kimya US, Inc. of Burlington, 
Massachusetts; Turk International LLC of Aptos, California; and Aalborz 
Chemical LLC d/b/a All Chem of Grand Rapids, Michigan.
    On October 17, 2013, the complainants moved to amend the complaint 
and notice of investigation to add a new claim of trade secret 
misappropriation against the respondents. On October 28, 2013, the 
respondents opposed the motion, and on October 30, 2013, the 
complainants filed a motion for leave to file an attached reply.
    On November 7, 2013, the ALJ granted the motion as an ID. Order No. 
8. No petitions for review of the ID were filed. The Commission has 
determined not to review the ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in sections 210.14 and 210.42 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure (19 CFR 210.14, 210.42).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: November 25, 2013.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013-28708 Filed 11-27-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.