Negotiated Rulemaking Committee, Negotiator Nominations and Schedule of Committee Meetings-Title IV Federal Student Aid Programs, Program Integrity and Improvement, 69612-69614 [2013-27850]
Download as PDF
69612
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules
not have ‘‘tribal implications’’ as
defined in that order. This proposed
rule would not have substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal
government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
government and Indian tribes.
V. Authority and Signature
David Michaels, Ph.D., MPH,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210,
authorized the preparation of this
notice. OSHA is issuing this proposed
rule under the following authorities: 29
U.S.C. 653, 655, 657; 40 U.S.C. 3701 et
seq.; 5 U.S.C. 553; Secretary of Labor’s
Order No. 1–2012 (77 FR 3912; Jan. 25,
2012); and 29 CFR part 1911.
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 1910
Mechanical power presses,
Occupational safety and health, Safety.
Signed at Washington, DC, on November 8,
2013.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health.
Proposed Amendments to Standards
For the reasons stated earlier in this
preamble, the Occupational Safety and
Health Administration is proposing to
amend 29 CFR part 1910 as set forth
below:
PART 1910—[AMENDED]
Subpart O—[Amended]
1. Revise the authority citation for
subpart O of part 1910 to read as
follows:
■
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 653, 655, 657;
Secretary of Labor’s Order No. 12–71 (36 FR
8754), 8–76 (41 FR 25059), 9–83 (48 FR
35736), 1–90 (55 FR 9033), 5–2002 (67 FR
65008), or 1–2012 (77 FR 3912), as
applicable; 20 CFR part 1911. Sections
1910.217 and 1910.219 also issued under 5
U.S.C. 553.
2. Amend § 1910.217 by revising
paragraph (e)(1) to read as follows:
■
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
§ 1910.217
Mechanical power presses.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(1) Inspection and maintenance
records. The employer shall establish
and follow an inspection program
having a general component and a
directed component.
(i) Under the general component of
the inspection program, the employer
shall:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:59 Nov 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
(A) Conduct periodic and regular
inspections of each power press to
ensure that all of its parts, auxiliary
equipment, and safeguards, including
the clutch/brake mechanism, antirepeat
feature, and single-stroke mechanism,
are in a safe operating condition and
adjustment;
(B) Perform and complete necessary
maintenance or repair, or both, before
operating the press; and
(C) Maintain a certification record of
each inspection, and each maintenance
and repair task performed, under this
general component of the inspection
program, that includes the date of the
inspection, maintenance, or repair work,
the signature of the person who
performed the inspection, maintenance,
or repair work, and the serial number,
or other identifier, of the power press
inspected, maintained, and repaired.
(ii) Under the directed component of
the inspection program, the employer
shall:
(A) Inspect and test each press on a
regular basis at least once a week to
determine the condition of the clutch/
brake mechanism, antirepeat feature,
and single-stroke mechanism;
(B) Perform and complete necessary
maintenance or repair, or both, on the
clutch/brake mechanism, antirepeat
feature, and single-stroke mechanism
before operating the press; and
(C) Maintain a certification record of
each maintenance task performed under
the directed component of the
inspection program that includes the
date of the maintenance task, the
signature of the person who performed
the maintenance task, and the serial
number, or other identifier, of the power
press maintained.
Note to paragraph (e)(1)(ii): Inspections of
the clutch/brake mechanism, antirepeat
feature, and single-stroke mechanism
conducted under the directed component of
the inspection program are exempt from the
requirement to maintain certification records
specified by paragraph (e)(1)(i)(C) of this
section, but inspections of the clutch/brake
mechanism, antirepeat feature, and singlestroke mechanism conducted under the
general component of the inspection program
are not exempt from this requirement.
(iii) Paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section
does not apply to presses that comply
with paragraphs (b)(13) and (14) of this
section.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2013–27694 Filed 11–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Chapter VI
[Docket ID ED–2013–OPE–0130]
Negotiated Rulemaking Committee,
Negotiator Nominations and Schedule
of Committee Meetings—Title IV
Federal Student Aid Programs,
Program Integrity and Improvement
Office of Postsecondary
Education, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of intention to establish.
AGENCY:
We announce our intention to
establish a negotiated rulemaking
committee to prepare proposed
regulations to address program integrity
and improvement issues for the Federal
Student Aid programs authorized under
title IV of the Higher Education Act of
1965, as amended (HEA) (title IV
Federal Student Aid programs). The
committee will include representatives
of organizations or groups with interests
that are significantly affected by the
subject matter of the proposed
regulations. We request nominations for
individual negotiators who represent
key stakeholder constituencies for the
issues to be negotiated to serve on the
committee, and we set a schedule for
committee meetings.
DATES: We must receive your
nominations for negotiators to serve on
the committee on or before December
20, 2013. The dates, times, and locations
of the committee meetings are set out in
the Schedule for Negotiations section in
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
ADDRESSES: Please send your
nominations for negotiators to Wendy
Macias, U.S. Department of Education,
1990 K Street NW., Room 8017,
Washington, DC 20006. Telephone:
(202) 502–7526 or by email:
wendy.macias@ed.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information about the content of this
notice, including information about the
negotiated rulemaking process or the
nomination submission process,
contact: Wendy Macias, U.S.
Department of Education, 1990 K Street
NW., Room 8017, Washington, DC
20006. Telephone: (202) 502–7526 or by
email: wendy.macias@ed.gov.
For general information about the
negotiated rulemaking process, see The
Negotiated Rulemaking Process for Title
IV Regulations, Frequently Asked
Questions at https://www2.ed.gov/policy/
highered/reg/hearulemaking/hea08/negreg-faq.html.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) or text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM
20NOP1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877–
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 1,
2012, we published a notice in the
Federal Register (77 FR 25658)
announcing our intent to establish a
negotiated rulemaking committee under
section 492 of the HEA to develop
proposed regulations designed to
prevent fraud and otherwise ensure
proper use of title IV Federal Student
Aid program funds, especially within
the context of current technologies. In
particular, we announced our intent to
propose regulations to address the use
of debit cards and other banking
mechanisms for disbursing title IV
Federal Student Aid program funds, and
to improve and streamline the campusbased Federal Student Aid programs.
We also announced two public hearings
at which interested parties could
comment on the topics suggested by the
Department and suggest additional
topics for consideration for action by the
negotiated rulemaking committee.
Those hearings were held on May 23,
2012, in Phoenix, Arizona, and on May
31, 2012, in Washington, DC. We
invited parties to comment and submit
topics for consideration in writing as
well.
On April 16, 2013, we published a
notice in the Federal Register (78 FR
22467), which we corrected on April 30,
2013 (78 FR 25235), announcing
additional topics for consideration for
action by the negotiated rulemaking
committee. The additional topics for
consideration were cash management of
funds provided under the title IV
Federal Student Aid programs; State
authorization for programs offered
through distance education or
correspondence education; State
authorization for foreign locations of
institutions located in a State; clock to
credit hour conversion; gainful
employment; changes made by the
Violence Against Women
Reauthorization Act of 2013, Public Law
113–4 (VAWA), to the campus safety
and security reporting requirements in
the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus
Security Policy and Campus Crime
Statistics Act (Clery Act); and the
definition of ‘‘adverse credit’’ for
borrowers in the Federal Direct PLUS
Loan Program. We announced three
public hearings at which interested
parties could comment on the new
topics suggested by the Department and
suggest additional topics for
consideration for action by the
negotiating committee. On May 13,
2013, we announced in the Federal
Register (78 FR 27880) the addition of
a fourth hearing. The hearings were held
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:59 Nov 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
on May 21, 2013, in Washington, DC;
May 23, 2013, in Minneapolis,
Minnesota; May 30, 2013, in San
Francisco, California; and June 4, 2013,
in Atlanta, Georgia. We also invited
parties unable to attend a public hearing
to submit written comments on the
additional topics and to submit other
topics for consideration. Transcripts
from all six public hearings are available
at https://www2.ed.gov/policy/highered/
reg/hearulemaking/2012/.
Written comments submitted in
response to the May 1, 2012, and April
16, 2013, notices may be viewed
through the Federal eRulemaking Portal
at www.regulations.gov. Instructions for
finding comments are available on the
site under ‘‘How to Use
Regulations.gov’’ in the Help section.
Individuals can enter docket ID ED–
2012–OPE–0008 in the search box to
locate the appropriate docket.
On June 12, 2013, we announced our
intention to establish a negotiated
rulemaking committee to prepare
proposed regulations to establish
standards for programs that prepare
students for gainful employment in a
recognized occupation (78 FR 35179).
On September 19, 2013, we announced
our intention to establish a negotiated
rulemaking committee to prepare
proposed regulations to address the
changes made by the VAWA to the
campus safety and security reporting
requirements in the Clery Act (78 FR
57571).
Regulatory Issues: After considering
the information received at the regional
hearings and the written comments, we
have decided to establish a third
negotiating committee to prepare
proposed regulations to address
program integrity and improvement
issues for the title IV Federal Student
Aid programs. We list the specific topics
the Program Integrity and Improvement
Committee is likely to address under
Committee Topics, below.
We intend to select negotiators for the
committee who represent the interests
significantly affected by the topics
proposed for negotiations. In so doing,
we will follow the requirement in
section 492(b)(1) of the HEA that the
individuals selected must have
demonstrated expertise or experience in
the relevant subjects under negotiation.
We will also select individual
negotiators who reflect the diversity
among program participants, in
accordance with section 492(b)(1) of the
HEA. Our goal is to establish a
committee that will allow significantly
affected parties to be represented while
keeping the committee size manageable.
The committee may create subgroups
on particular topics that may involve
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
69613
additional individuals who are not
members of the committee. Such
individuals who are not selected as
members of the committee will be able
to attend the meetings, have access to
the individuals representing their
constituencies, and participate in
informal working groups on various
issues between the meetings. The
committee meetings will be open to the
public.
Committee Topics: The topics the
Program Integrity and Improvement
Committee is likely to address are:
• Cash management of funds
provided under the title IV Federal
Student Aid programs, including the
use of debit cards and the handling of
title IV credit balances.
• State authorization for programs
offered through distance education or
correspondence education.
• State authorization for foreign
locations of institutions located in a
State.
• Clock to credit hour conversion.
• The definition of ‘‘adverse credit’’
for borrowers in the Federal Direct
PLUS Loan Program.
• The application of the repeat
coursework provisions to graduate and
undergraduate programs.
These topics are tentative. Topics may
be added or removed as the process
continues.
The committee’s consideration of the
cash management regulations will
concern, in part, whether they provide
opportunities to deter fraud and
otherwise ensure proper use of title IV
Federal Student Aid program funds
within the context of current
technologies. We note that the
Department has taken a number of nonregulatory steps to address the concerns
in this area raised by the September 26,
2011, Office of Inspector General’s (OIG)
Investigative Program Advisory Report.
On October 20, 2011, the Department
issued Dear Colleague Letter GEN–11–
17, recommending actions that
institutions can take to detect and
prevent fraud in distance education
programs and announcing the
establishment of a Department-wide
task force on the subject. The
Department also implemented changes
to the verification requirements. For
example, Dear Colleague Letter GEN–
13–09, published March 8, 2013,
describes Department screening
procedures for students with unusual
enrollment histories and requires
institutions to resolve the resulting
Institutional Student Information
Record codes for these students. We
believe that these non-regulatory efforts
will mitigate the vulnerabilities
identified by the OIG report, and will
E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM
20NOP1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
69614
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2013 / Proposed Rules
consider their results in deciding
whether additional rule changes are
needed in the future to address student
fraud.
The Department continues to review
the valuable testimony offered at the
public hearings and the comments
submitted through the public comment
process regarding other proposed
rulemaking topics, and may form
additional committees to consider other
topics.
Constituencies: We have identified
the following constituencies as having
interests that are significantly affected
by the topics proposed for negotiations.
The Department plans to seat as
negotiators individuals from
organizations or groups representing
these constituencies:
• Students.
• Legal assistance organizations that
represent students.
• Consumer advocacy organizations.
• State higher education executive
officers.
• State attorneys general and other
appropriate State officials.
• Business and industry.
• Institutions of higher education
eligible to receive Federal assistance
under title III, Parts A, B, and F, and
title V of the HEA, which include
Historically Black Colleges and
Universities, Hispanic-Serving
Institutions, American Indian Tribally
Controlled Colleges and Universities,
Alaska Native and Native HawaiianServing Institutions, Predominantly
Black Institutions, and other institutions
with a substantial enrollment of needy
students as defined in title III of the
HEA.
• Two-year public institutions of
higher education.
• Four-year public institutions of
higher education.
• Private, non-profit institutions of
higher education.
• Private, for-profit institutions of
higher education.
• Regional accrediting agencies.
• National accrediting agencies.
• Specialized accrediting agencies.
• Financial aid administrators at
postsecondary institutions.
• Business officers and bursars at
postsecondary institutions.
• Admissions officers at
postsecondary institutions.
• Institutional third-party servicers
who perform functions related to the
title IV Federal Student Aid programs
(including collection agencies).
• State approval agencies.
• Lenders, community banks, and
credit unions.
The goal of the committee is to
develop proposed regulations that
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:59 Nov 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
reflect a final consensus of the
committee. Consensus means that there
is no dissent by any member of the
negotiating committee, including the
committee member representing the
Department. An individual selected as a
negotiator will be expected to represent
the interests of his or her organization
or group and participate in the
negotiations in a manner consistent
with the goal of developing proposed
regulations on which the committee will
reach consensus. If consensus is
reached, all members of the organization
or group represented by a negotiator are
bound by the consensus and are
prohibited from commenting negatively
on the resulting proposed regulations.
The Department will not consider any
such negative comments on the
proposed regulations that are submitted
by members of such an organization or
group.
Nominations: Nominations should
include:
• The committee for which the
nominee is nominated (Program
Integrity and Improvement).
• The name of the nominee, the
organization or group the nominee
represents, and a description of the
interests that the nominee represents.
• Evidence of the nominee’s expertise
or experience in the subjects to be
negotiated.
• Evidence of support from
individuals or groups within the
constituency that the nominee will
represent.
• The nominee’s commitment that he
or she will actively participate in good
faith in the development of the
proposed regulations.
• The nominee’s contact information,
including address, phone number, fax
number, and email address.
For a better understanding of the
negotiated rulemaking process,
nominees should review The Negotiated
Rulemaking Process for Title IV
Regulations, Frequently Asked
Questions at https://www.ed.gov/policy/
highered/reg/hearulemaking/hea08/negreg-faq.html prior to committing to
serve as a negotiator.
Nominees will be notified whether or
not they have been selected as
negotiators as soon as the Department’s
review process is completed.
Schedule for Negotiations: The
Program Integrity and Improvement
Committee will meet for three sessions
on the following dates:
Session 1: February 19–21, 2014
Session 2: March 26–28, 2014
Session 3: April 23–25, 2014
Sessions will run from 9 a.m. to 5
p.m.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The committee meetings will be held
at the U.S. Department of Education at:
1990 K Street NW., Eighth Floor
Conference Center, Washington, DC
20006.
The meetings are open to the public.
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or compact disc) on
request to the program contact person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register
and the Code of Federal Regulations is
available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you
can view this document, as well as all
other documents of the Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF). To use PDF you must
have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site. You may also
access documents of the Department
published in the Federal Register by
using the article search feature at:
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically,
through the advanced search feature at
this site, you can limit your search to
documents published by the
Department.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1098a.
Dated: November 15, 2013.
Lynn B. Mahaffie,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy,
Planning, and Innovation, delegated the
authority to perform the functions and duties
of the Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary
Education.
[FR Doc. 2013–27850 Filed 11–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900–AO17
Home Improvements and Structural
Alterations (HISA) Benefits Program
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) proposes to establish
regulations for the Home Improvements
and Structural Alterations (HISA)
benefits program. Through the HISA
benefits program, VA has provided
monetary benefits to disabled veterans
for necessary home improvements and
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20NOP1.SGM
20NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 224 (Wednesday, November 20, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 69612-69614]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27850]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Chapter VI
[Docket ID ED-2013-OPE-0130]
Negotiated Rulemaking Committee, Negotiator Nominations and
Schedule of Committee Meetings--Title IV Federal Student Aid Programs,
Program Integrity and Improvement
AGENCY: Office of Postsecondary Education, Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice of intention to establish.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We announce our intention to establish a negotiated rulemaking
committee to prepare proposed regulations to address program integrity
and improvement issues for the Federal Student Aid programs authorized
under title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA)
(title IV Federal Student Aid programs). The committee will include
representatives of organizations or groups with interests that are
significantly affected by the subject matter of the proposed
regulations. We request nominations for individual negotiators who
represent key stakeholder constituencies for the issues to be
negotiated to serve on the committee, and we set a schedule for
committee meetings.
DATES: We must receive your nominations for negotiators to serve on the
committee on or before December 20, 2013. The dates, times, and
locations of the committee meetings are set out in the Schedule for
Negotiations section in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
ADDRESSES: Please send your nominations for negotiators to Wendy
Macias, U.S. Department of Education, 1990 K Street NW., Room 8017,
Washington, DC 20006. Telephone: (202) 502-7526 or by email:
wendy.macias@ed.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information about the content of
this notice, including information about the negotiated rulemaking
process or the nomination submission process, contact: Wendy Macias,
U.S. Department of Education, 1990 K Street NW., Room 8017, Washington,
DC 20006. Telephone: (202) 502-7526 or by email: wendy.macias@ed.gov.
For general information about the negotiated rulemaking process,
see The Negotiated Rulemaking Process for Title IV Regulations,
Frequently Asked Questions at https://www2.ed.gov/policy/highered/reg/hearulemaking/hea08/neg-reg-faq.html.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay
[[Page 69613]]
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 1, 2012, we published a notice in the
Federal Register (77 FR 25658) announcing our intent to establish a
negotiated rulemaking committee under section 492 of the HEA to develop
proposed regulations designed to prevent fraud and otherwise ensure
proper use of title IV Federal Student Aid program funds, especially
within the context of current technologies. In particular, we announced
our intent to propose regulations to address the use of debit cards and
other banking mechanisms for disbursing title IV Federal Student Aid
program funds, and to improve and streamline the campus-based Federal
Student Aid programs. We also announced two public hearings at which
interested parties could comment on the topics suggested by the
Department and suggest additional topics for consideration for action
by the negotiated rulemaking committee. Those hearings were held on May
23, 2012, in Phoenix, Arizona, and on May 31, 2012, in Washington, DC.
We invited parties to comment and submit topics for consideration in
writing as well.
On April 16, 2013, we published a notice in the Federal Register
(78 FR 22467), which we corrected on April 30, 2013 (78 FR 25235),
announcing additional topics for consideration for action by the
negotiated rulemaking committee. The additional topics for
consideration were cash management of funds provided under the title IV
Federal Student Aid programs; State authorization for programs offered
through distance education or correspondence education; State
authorization for foreign locations of institutions located in a State;
clock to credit hour conversion; gainful employment; changes made by
the Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2013, Public Law 113-
4 (VAWA), to the campus safety and security reporting requirements in
the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime
Statistics Act (Clery Act); and the definition of ``adverse credit''
for borrowers in the Federal Direct PLUS Loan Program. We announced
three public hearings at which interested parties could comment on the
new topics suggested by the Department and suggest additional topics
for consideration for action by the negotiating committee. On May 13,
2013, we announced in the Federal Register (78 FR 27880) the addition
of a fourth hearing. The hearings were held on May 21, 2013, in
Washington, DC; May 23, 2013, in Minneapolis, Minnesota; May 30, 2013,
in San Francisco, California; and June 4, 2013, in Atlanta, Georgia. We
also invited parties unable to attend a public hearing to submit
written comments on the additional topics and to submit other topics
for consideration. Transcripts from all six public hearings are
available at https://www2.ed.gov/policy/highered/reg/hearulemaking/2012/. Written comments submitted in response to the May 1, 2012,
and April 16, 2013, notices may be viewed through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov. Instructions for finding
comments are available on the site under ``How to Use Regulations.gov''
in the Help section. Individuals can enter docket ID ED-2012-OPE-0008
in the search box to locate the appropriate docket.
On June 12, 2013, we announced our intention to establish a
negotiated rulemaking committee to prepare proposed regulations to
establish standards for programs that prepare students for gainful
employment in a recognized occupation (78 FR 35179). On September 19,
2013, we announced our intention to establish a negotiated rulemaking
committee to prepare proposed regulations to address the changes made
by the VAWA to the campus safety and security reporting requirements in
the Clery Act (78 FR 57571).
Regulatory Issues: After considering the information received at
the regional hearings and the written comments, we have decided to
establish a third negotiating committee to prepare proposed regulations
to address program integrity and improvement issues for the title IV
Federal Student Aid programs. We list the specific topics the Program
Integrity and Improvement Committee is likely to address under
Committee Topics, below.
We intend to select negotiators for the committee who represent the
interests significantly affected by the topics proposed for
negotiations. In so doing, we will follow the requirement in section
492(b)(1) of the HEA that the individuals selected must have
demonstrated expertise or experience in the relevant subjects under
negotiation. We will also select individual negotiators who reflect the
diversity among program participants, in accordance with section
492(b)(1) of the HEA. Our goal is to establish a committee that will
allow significantly affected parties to be represented while keeping
the committee size manageable.
The committee may create subgroups on particular topics that may
involve additional individuals who are not members of the committee.
Such individuals who are not selected as members of the committee will
be able to attend the meetings, have access to the individuals
representing their constituencies, and participate in informal working
groups on various issues between the meetings. The committee meetings
will be open to the public.
Committee Topics: The topics the Program Integrity and Improvement
Committee is likely to address are:
Cash management of funds provided under the title IV
Federal Student Aid programs, including the use of debit cards and the
handling of title IV credit balances.
State authorization for programs offered through distance
education or correspondence education.
State authorization for foreign locations of institutions
located in a State.
Clock to credit hour conversion.
The definition of ``adverse credit'' for borrowers in the
Federal Direct PLUS Loan Program.
The application of the repeat coursework provisions to
graduate and undergraduate programs.
These topics are tentative. Topics may be added or removed as the
process continues.
The committee's consideration of the cash management regulations
will concern, in part, whether they provide opportunities to deter
fraud and otherwise ensure proper use of title IV Federal Student Aid
program funds within the context of current technologies. We note that
the Department has taken a number of non-regulatory steps to address
the concerns in this area raised by the September 26, 2011, Office of
Inspector General's (OIG) Investigative Program Advisory Report. On
October 20, 2011, the Department issued Dear Colleague Letter GEN-11-
17, recommending actions that institutions can take to detect and
prevent fraud in distance education programs and announcing the
establishment of a Department-wide task force on the subject. The
Department also implemented changes to the verification requirements.
For example, Dear Colleague Letter GEN-13-09, published March 8, 2013,
describes Department screening procedures for students with unusual
enrollment histories and requires institutions to resolve the resulting
Institutional Student Information Record codes for these students. We
believe that these non-regulatory efforts will mitigate the
vulnerabilities identified by the OIG report, and will
[[Page 69614]]
consider their results in deciding whether additional rule changes are
needed in the future to address student fraud.
The Department continues to review the valuable testimony offered
at the public hearings and the comments submitted through the public
comment process regarding other proposed rulemaking topics, and may
form additional committees to consider other topics.
Constituencies: We have identified the following constituencies as
having interests that are significantly affected by the topics proposed
for negotiations. The Department plans to seat as negotiators
individuals from organizations or groups representing these
constituencies:
Students.
Legal assistance organizations that represent students.
Consumer advocacy organizations.
State higher education executive officers.
State attorneys general and other appropriate State
officials.
Business and industry.
Institutions of higher education eligible to receive
Federal assistance under title III, Parts A, B, and F, and title V of
the HEA, which include Historically Black Colleges and Universities,
Hispanic-Serving Institutions, American Indian Tribally Controlled
Colleges and Universities, Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian-Serving
Institutions, Predominantly Black Institutions, and other institutions
with a substantial enrollment of needy students as defined in title III
of the HEA.
Two-year public institutions of higher education.
Four-year public institutions of higher education.
Private, non-profit institutions of higher education.
Private, for-profit institutions of higher education.
Regional accrediting agencies.
National accrediting agencies.
Specialized accrediting agencies.
Financial aid administrators at postsecondary
institutions.
Business officers and bursars at postsecondary
institutions.
Admissions officers at postsecondary institutions.
Institutional third-party servicers who perform functions
related to the title IV Federal Student Aid programs (including
collection agencies).
State approval agencies.
Lenders, community banks, and credit unions.
The goal of the committee is to develop proposed regulations that
reflect a final consensus of the committee. Consensus means that there
is no dissent by any member of the negotiating committee, including the
committee member representing the Department. An individual selected as
a negotiator will be expected to represent the interests of his or her
organization or group and participate in the negotiations in a manner
consistent with the goal of developing proposed regulations on which
the committee will reach consensus. If consensus is reached, all
members of the organization or group represented by a negotiator are
bound by the consensus and are prohibited from commenting negatively on
the resulting proposed regulations. The Department will not consider
any such negative comments on the proposed regulations that are
submitted by members of such an organization or group.
Nominations: Nominations should include:
The committee for which the nominee is nominated (Program
Integrity and Improvement).
The name of the nominee, the organization or group the
nominee represents, and a description of the interests that the nominee
represents.
Evidence of the nominee's expertise or experience in the
subjects to be negotiated.
Evidence of support from individuals or groups within the
constituency that the nominee will represent.
The nominee's commitment that he or she will actively
participate in good faith in the development of the proposed
regulations.
The nominee's contact information, including address,
phone number, fax number, and email address.
For a better understanding of the negotiated rulemaking process,
nominees should review The Negotiated Rulemaking Process for Title IV
Regulations, Frequently Asked Questions at https://www.ed.gov/policy/highered/reg/hearulemaking/hea08/neg-reg-faq.html prior to committing
to serve as a negotiator.
Nominees will be notified whether or not they have been selected as
negotiators as soon as the Department's review process is completed.
Schedule for Negotiations: The Program Integrity and Improvement
Committee will meet for three sessions on the following dates:
Session 1: February 19-21, 2014
Session 2: March 26-28, 2014
Session 3: April 23-25, 2014
Sessions will run from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
The committee meetings will be held at the U.S. Department of
Education at: 1990 K Street NW., Eighth Floor Conference Center,
Washington, DC 20006.
The meetings are open to the public.
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print,
audiotape, or compact disc) on request to the program contact person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free
Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations is available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you can view this document, as well
as all other documents of the Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). To use PDF
you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at the
site. You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at:
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1098a.
Dated: November 15, 2013.
Lynn B. Mahaffie,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Planning, and Innovation,
delegated the authority to perform the functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2013-27850 Filed 11-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P