Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change To Eliminate the e-DPM Program, 69723-69725 [2013-27755]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2013 / Notices become effective pursuant to 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 9 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 10 thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–MIAX–2013–48 and should be submitted on or before December 11, 2013. Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.11 Kevin M. O’Neill, Deputy Secretary. Electronic Comments BILLING CODE 8011–01–P • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–MIAX–2013–48 on the subject line. Paper Comments tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES • Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–MIAX–2013–48. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 9 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b– 4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this requirement. 10 17 VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:04 Nov 19, 2013 Jkt 232001 [FR Doc. 2013–27757 Filed 11–19–13; 8:45 am] SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–70875; File No. SR–CBOE– 2013–110] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change To Eliminate the e-DPM Program November 14, 2013. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on November 1, 2013, Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘CBOE’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of the Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to eliminate its e-DPM program. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s Web site (https:// www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/ CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at 11 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b-4. PO 00000 Frm 00084 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 69723 the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose In 2004, the Exchange adopted its Electronic DPM (‘‘e-DPM’’) Program (the ‘‘Program’’), under which the Exchange has allowed TPHs to remotely function as a Designated Primary Market-Maker (‘‘DPM’’).3 e-DPMs act as specialists on CBOE by entering bids and offers electronically from locations other than the trading crowds where the applicable option classes are traded, and are not required to have traders physically present in the trading crowd. As specialists, e-DPMs share in the DPM participation right in their allocated classes and have similar rights and responsibilities to DPMs. The Exchange has determined that the Program is no longer competitively necessary; the growing prevalence of Preferred Market-Maker (‘‘PMM’’) routing, which provides a higher participation entitlement on [sic] for orders on which a Market-Maker is labeled ‘‘preferred’’, has rendered the initially-unique tenets of the Program less relevant and attractive to the eDPMs. All e-DPMs are PMMs on orders to which the e-DPM is labeled ‘‘preferred’’, and PMMs otherwise have many similar characteristics as e-DPMs. e-DPMs have similar or greater quoting obligations as PMMs despite this lower participation entitlement. On most transactions to which the e-DPM entitlement applies (if no party is labeled ‘‘preferred’’ for that order, or the party labeled ‘‘preferred’’ is not at the NBBO), e-DPMs are only guaranteed a 3 For more information on the Program, see Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 50003 (July 12, 2004) (SR–CBOE–2004–24) and 49577 (April 19, 2004) (SR–CBOE–2004–17). E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM 20NON1 69724 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2013 / Notices tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES maximum of 15% participation entitlement per order.4 However, PMMs have a maximum of 40% participation entitlement on orders that are preferred to them.5 If an e-DPM is preferred to an order, the e-DPM is also the PMM and receives the 40% PMM entitlement instead of just the 15% e-DPM entitlement.6 Therefore, e-DPMs only benefit in circumstances in which an order is not preferred to any party, or the preferred party is not at the NBBO. However, over 85% of orders that come into the Exchange are preferred orders. The much greater participation entitlement for a PMM (40%) provides a much stronger incentive to quote at the NBBO than the lower (15%) entitlement for e-DPMs. Therefore, it is more beneficial in nearly all circumstances to be a PMM than to be an e-DPM. The Exchange does not believe that the elimination of the Program will affect CBOE’s market quality. This is because the Exchange does not expect any Market-Makers to cease doing business on the Exchange due to the elimination of the Program; instead, the Exchange expects them all to stay on as Market-Makers and, on an order-byorder basis, PMMs (as being a PMM is often more beneficial than being an eDPM anyway). Also, the Exchange does not require DPMs in every class, but every class (except SPX) currently has a DPM (and SPX has LMMs instead of DPMs or e-DPMs). Further, other U.S. options exchanges do not have programs similar to the Program. As such, the Exchange now proposes to discontinue the Program, and delete Rules 8.92 (Electronic DPM Program), 8.93 (e-DPM Obligations) and 8.94 (Review of e-DPM Operations and Performance), along with all references to the Program, eDPMs, and Rules 8.92–8.94, from the CBOE Rules. The Exchange proposes to eliminate the e-DPM Program because the Exchange believes that it is almost always redundant with the PMM program (but much less beneficial than the PMM program) and adds an unnecessary layer of complexity to CBOE rules, system processes, matching 4 On the vast majority of transactions to which the e-DPM entitlement applies, there are three or more Market-Makers also quoting at the Exchange’s best bid/offer, which sets the collective DPM/e-DPM entitlement at 30% (See CBOE Rule 8.87(b)(2)). One-half of this collective entitlement goes to the e-DPM(s) at the Exchange’s best bid/offer (See CBOE Rule 8.87(b)(3)). 5 On the vast majority of transactions to which the PMM entitlement applies, there are two or more Market-Makers also quoting at the Exchange’s best bid/offer, which sets the PMM entitlement at 40% (See CBOE Rule 8.13(c)). 6 See CBOE Rule 8.87(b)(4). VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:04 Nov 19, 2013 Jkt 232001 algorithm and trading procedures. Further, due to this redundancy (and programs at other exchanges that are similar to the PMM program 7), the Exchange does not believe that the eDPM Program provides CBOE with any competitive advantage. Moreover, the removal of the e-DPM complexity will provide the Exchange with more flexibility to consider other methods of encouraging DPM performance. Upon approval of this proposed rule change, the Exchange will announce the impending elimination of the Program via a Regulatory Circular. This Regulatory Circular will include an end date for the Program that will be at least two weeks in advance in order for current e-DPMs to work with the Exchange to determine their preferred courses of action. The Exchange anticipates that most, if not all, e-DPMs will remain TPHs on the Exchange in a regular Market-Maker capacity (with the ability to act as a PMM on an order-byorder basis when they are preferred on an order) and will not be unduly harmed by the elimination of the Program (for the reasons described above). e-DPMs that desire to continue to act as Market-Makers (with the ability to act as a PMM on an order-by-order basis when they are preferred on an order) will be informed of the elimination of their e-DPM status and provided the opportunity to elect to become Market-Makers in those classes to which they are currently appointed as e-DPMs. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.8 Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) 9 requirements that the rules of an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitation transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. 7 See NASDAQ OMX PHLX (‘‘PHLX’’) Directed Order program, described in PHLX Rules 1080(l) and 1014(g)(viii). 8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). PO 00000 Frm 00085 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) 10 requirement that the rules of an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. The Exchange believes that the proposed elimination of the Program will not significantly harm market quality, as current e-DPMs will be able to act as PMMs for orders on which they are preferred (which is more beneficial anyway). Indeed, the much greater participation entitlement for a PMM provides a much stronger incentive to quote at the NBBO than the lower entitlement for e-DPMs, which provides for narrower spreads. Following the proposed elimination of the Program, all e-DPMs will still be Market-Makers with the ability to act as PMMs for orders on which they are preferred. This will place the former e-DPMs on the same competitive position as PMMs. Further, other U.S. options exchanges do not have programs similar to the Program, but do have programs similar to CBOE’s PMM program. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange does not believe that the proposed elimination of the Program will impose an unnecessary burden on intramarket competition because eDPMs, who are all also PMMs (for orders on which they are preferred), will merely be placed in the same competitive position as PMMs (for orders on which they are preferred). The Exchange does not believe that the proposed elimination of the Program will impose an unnecessary burden on intermarket competition because other U.S. options exchanges do not have programs similar to the Program (though they do have programs similar to CBOE’s PMM program), and because the elimination of Program only affects eDPMs on CBOE. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the proposed rule change. 10 Id. E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM 20NON1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2013 / Notices III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the Exchange consents, the Commission will: A. By order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or B. institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal offices of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–CBOE– 2013–110, and should be submitted on or before December 11, 2013. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.11 Kevin M. O’Neill, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2013–27755 Filed 11–19–13; 8:45 am] IV. Solicitation of Comments BILLING CODE 8011–01–P Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–70874; File No. SR–Phlx– 2013–111] • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml ); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– CBOE–2013–110 on the subject line. Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Exchange’s Pricing Schedule Under Section VIII With Respect To Execution and Routing of Orders in Securities Priced at $1 or More Per Share Paper Comments November 14, 2013. • Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–CBOE–2013–110. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml ). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on October 31, 2013, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (‘‘Phlx’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Electronic Comments VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:04 Nov 19, 2013 Jkt 232001 I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to amend the Exchange’s Pricing Schedule under Section VIII, entitled ‘‘NASDAQ OMX PSX FEES,’’ with respect to execution and routing of orders in securities priced at $1 or more per share. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s Web site at https:// nasdaqomxphlx.cchwallstreet.com/, at the principal office of the Exchange, and 11 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 1 15 PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 69725 at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend the certain fees and rebates for order execution and routing applicable to the use of the order execution and routing services of the NASDAQ OMX PSX System by member organizations for all securities traded at $1 or more per share. Amended Fees for Execution of Quotes/ Orders in Securities Listed on Nasdaq The Exchange is proposing to amend fees assessed for the execution of orders in securities listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’) that execute in NASDAQ OMX PSX (‘‘PSX’’). Currently, the Exchange assesses a charge of $0.0028 per share executed for an order entered through a PSX Market Participant Identifier (‘‘MPID’’) through which the member organization provides an average daily volume of 10,000 or more shares of liquidity during the month. The Exchange is proposing to increase the charge assessed for such orders executed at PSX to $0.0030. The Exchange is also proposing to increase the charge assessed for an order executed in PSX in Nasdaq securities that is designated as eligible for routing. Currently, the Exchange assesses a charge of $0.0028 per share executed for an order that is designated as eligible for routing. The Exchange is proposing to increase the charge assessed for such orders executed at PSX to $0.0030. Amended Fees for Execution of Quotes/ Orders in Securities Listed on NYSE The Exchange is proposing to amend fees assessed and credits provided for the execution of orders in securities listed on the New York Stock Exchange, E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM 20NON1

Agencies

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 224 (Wednesday, November 20, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69723-69725]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27755]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-70875; File No. SR-CBOE-2013-110]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change To Eliminate
the e-DPM Program

November 14, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on November 1, 2013, Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(the ``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

The Exchange proposes to eliminate its e-DPM program. The text of
the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site
(https://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the
Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
In 2004, the Exchange adopted its Electronic DPM (``e-DPM'')
Program (the ``Program''), under which the Exchange has allowed TPHs to
remotely function as a Designated Primary Market-Maker (``DPM'').\3\ e-
DPMs act as specialists on CBOE by entering bids and offers
electronically from locations other than the trading crowds where the
applicable option classes are traded, and are not required to have
traders physically present in the trading crowd. As specialists, e-DPMs
share in the DPM participation right in their allocated classes and
have similar rights and responsibilities to DPMs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\3\ For more information on the Program, see Securities Exchange
Act Release Nos. 50003 (July 12, 2004) (SR-CBOE-2004-24) and 49577
(April 19, 2004) (SR-CBOE-2004-17).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Exchange has determined that the Program is no longer
competitively necessary; the growing prevalence of Preferred Market-
Maker (``PMM'') routing, which provides a higher participation
entitlement on [sic] for orders on which a Market-Maker is labeled
``preferred'', has rendered the initially-unique tenets of the Program
less relevant and attractive to the e-DPMs. All e-DPMs are PMMs on
orders to which the e-DPM is labeled ``preferred'', and PMMs otherwise
have many similar characteristics as e-DPMs. e-DPMs have similar or
greater quoting obligations as PMMs despite this lower participation
entitlement. On most transactions to which the e-DPM entitlement
applies (if no party is labeled ``preferred'' for that order, or the
party labeled ``preferred'' is not at the NBBO), e-DPMs are only
guaranteed a

[[Page 69724]]

maximum of 15% participation entitlement per order.\4\ However, PMMs
have a maximum of 40% participation entitlement on orders that are
preferred to them.\5\ If an e-DPM is preferred to an order, the e-DPM
is also the PMM and receives the 40% PMM entitlement instead of just
the 15% e-DPM entitlement.\6\ Therefore, e-DPMs only benefit in
circumstances in which an order is not preferred to any party, or the
preferred party is not at the NBBO. However, over 85% of orders that
come into the Exchange are preferred orders. The much greater
participation entitlement for a PMM (40%) provides a much stronger
incentive to quote at the NBBO than the lower (15%) entitlement for e-
DPMs. Therefore, it is more beneficial in nearly all circumstances to
be a PMM than to be an e-DPM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\4\ On the vast majority of transactions to which the e-DPM
entitlement applies, there are three or more Market-Makers also
quoting at the Exchange's best bid/offer, which sets the collective
DPM/e-DPM entitlement at 30% (See CBOE Rule 8.87(b)(2)). One-half of
this collective entitlement goes to the e-DPM(s) at the Exchange's
best bid/offer (See CBOE Rule 8.87(b)(3)).
\5\ On the vast majority of transactions to which the PMM
entitlement applies, there are two or more Market-Makers also
quoting at the Exchange's best bid/offer, which sets the PMM
entitlement at 40% (See CBOE Rule 8.13(c)).
\6\ See CBOE Rule 8.87(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Exchange does not believe that the elimination of the Program
will affect CBOE's market quality. This is because the Exchange does
not expect any Market-Makers to cease doing business on the Exchange
due to the elimination of the Program; instead, the Exchange expects
them all to stay on as Market-Makers and, on an order-by-order basis,
PMMs (as being a PMM is often more beneficial than being an e-DPM
anyway). Also, the Exchange does not require DPMs in every class, but
every class (except SPX) currently has a DPM (and SPX has LMMs instead
of DPMs or e-DPMs). Further, other U.S. options exchanges do not have
programs similar to the Program. As such, the Exchange now proposes to
discontinue the Program, and delete Rules 8.92 (Electronic DPM
Program), 8.93 (e-DPM Obligations) and 8.94 (Review of e-DPM Operations
and Performance), along with all references to the Program, e-DPMs, and
Rules 8.92-8.94, from the CBOE Rules.
The Exchange proposes to eliminate the e-DPM Program because the
Exchange believes that it is almost always redundant with the PMM
program (but much less beneficial than the PMM program) and adds an
unnecessary layer of complexity to CBOE rules, system processes,
matching algorithm and trading procedures. Further, due to this
redundancy (and programs at other exchanges that are similar to the PMM
program \7\), the Exchange does not believe that the e-DPM Program
provides CBOE with any competitive advantage. Moreover, the removal of
the e-DPM complexity will provide the Exchange with more flexibility to
consider other methods of encouraging DPM performance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\7\ See NASDAQ OMX PHLX (``PHLX'') Directed Order program,
described in PHLX Rules 1080(l) and 1014(g)(viii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Upon approval of this proposed rule change, the Exchange will
announce the impending elimination of the Program via a Regulatory
Circular. This Regulatory Circular will include an end date for the
Program that will be at least two weeks in advance in order for current
e-DPMs to work with the Exchange to determine their preferred courses
of action. The Exchange anticipates that most, if not all, e-DPMs will
remain TPHs on the Exchange in a regular Market-Maker capacity (with
the ability to act as a PMM on an order-by-order basis when they are
preferred on an order) and will not be unduly harmed by the elimination
of the Program (for the reasons described above). e-DPMs that desire to
continue to act as Market-Makers (with the ability to act as a PMM on
an order-by-order basis when they are preferred on an order) will be
informed of the elimination of their e-DPM status and provided the
opportunity to elect to become Market-Makers in those classes to which
they are currently appointed as e-DPMs.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the
Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the
Act.\8\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \9\ requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitation transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \10\ requirement that the rules of
an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. The Exchange believes that the
proposed elimination of the Program will not significantly harm market
quality, as current e-DPMs will be able to act as PMMs for orders on
which they are preferred (which is more beneficial anyway). Indeed, the
much greater participation entitlement for a PMM provides a much
stronger incentive to quote at the NBBO than the lower entitlement for
e-DPMs, which provides for narrower spreads. Following the proposed
elimination of the Program, all e-DPMs will still be Market-Makers with
the ability to act as PMMs for orders on which they are preferred. This
will place the former e-DPMs on the same competitive position as PMMs.
Further, other U.S. options exchanges do not have programs similar to
the Program, but do have programs similar to CBOE's PMM program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\10\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange does not believe
that the proposed elimination of the Program will impose an unnecessary
burden on intramarket competition because e-DPMs, who are all also PMMs
(for orders on which they are preferred), will merely be placed in the
same competitive position as PMMs (for orders on which they are
preferred). The Exchange does not believe that the proposed elimination
of the Program will impose an unnecessary burden on intermarket
competition because other U.S. options exchanges do not have programs
similar to the Program (though they do have programs similar to CBOE's
PMM program), and because the elimination of Program only affects e-
DPMs on CBOE.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

[[Page 69725]]

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the
Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be
appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the Exchange consents, the Commission will:
A. By order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or
B. institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml ); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2013-110 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2013-110. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington,
DC 20549-1090 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m.
and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal offices of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2013-110, and should be
submitted on or before December 11, 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

\11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-27755 Filed 11-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.