Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Schedule of Fees, 69714-69718 [2013-27753]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
69714
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2013 / Notices
information collected pursuant to the
‘‘short exempt’’ marking requirement
may be publicly available because it
may be published, in a form that would
not identify individual broker-dealers,
by SROs that publish on their Internet
Web sites aggregate short selling volume
data in each individual equity security
for that day and, on a one-month
delayed basis, information regarding
individual short sale transactions in all
exchange-listed equity securities.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
The public may view background
documentation for this information
collection at the following Web site,
www.reginfo.gov. Comments should be
directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the
Securities and Exchange Commission,
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Room 10102, New Executive
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503,
or by sending an email to: Shagufta_
Ahmed@omb.eop.gov; and (ii) Thomas
Bayer, Director/Chief Information
Officer, Securities and Exchange
Commission, c/o Remi Pavlik-Simon,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549
or send an email to: PRA_Mailbox@
sec.gov. Comments must be submitted to
OMB within 30 days of this notice.
Dated: November 14, 2013.
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–27762 Filed 11–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor
Education and Advocacy, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549–0213.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Extension:
Regulation S–AM, SEC File No. 270–548,
OMB Control No. 3235–0609.
Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(‘‘PRA’’) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(‘‘OMB’’) a request for approval of
extension of the previously approved
collection of information provided for in
Regulation S–AM (17 CFR Part 248,
Subpart B), under the Fair Credit
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:04 Nov 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
Reporting Act (15 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.)
(‘‘FCRA’’), the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.), the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (15
U.S.C. 80a–1 et seq.), and the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (15
U.S.C. 80b–1 et seq.).
Regulation S–AM implements the
requirements of Section 624 of the
FCRA (15 U.S.C. 1681s–3) as applied to
brokers, dealers, and investment
companies, as well as investment
advisers and transfer agents that are
registered with the Commission
(collectively, ‘‘Covered Persons’’).
Under Section 624 and the regulation,
before a receiving affiliate may make
marketing solicitations based on the
communication of certain consumer
financial information from a Covered
Person, the Covered Person must
provide a notice to each affected
individual informing the individual of
his or her right to prohibit such
marketing. The regulation potentially
applies to all of the approximately
19,856 Covered Persons registered with
the Commission, although only
approximately 11,119 of them have one
or more corporate affiliates, and the
regulation requires only approximately
1,986 to provide consumers with an
affiliate marketing notice and an opt-out
opportunity.
The Commission staff estimates that
there are approximately 11,119 Covered
Persons having one or more affiliates,
and that they each spend an average of
0.20 hours per year to review affiliate
marketing practices, for, collectively, an
estimated annual time burden of 2,224
hours at an annual internal staff cost of
approximately $980,784. The staff also
estimates that approximately 1,986
Covered Persons provide notice and optout opportunities to consumers, and
that they each spend an average of 7.6
hours per year creating notices,
providing notices and opt-out
opportunities, monitoring the opt-out
notice process, making and updating
records of opt-out elections, and
addressing consumer questions and
concerns about opt-out notices, for,
collectively, an estimated annual time
burden of 15,094 hours at an annual
internal staff cost of approximately
$2,705,054. Thus, the staff estimates
that the collection of information
requires a total of approximately 11,119
respondents to incur an estimated
annual time burden of a total of 17,318
hours at a total annual internal cost of
compliance of approximately
$3,339,438.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
under the PRA unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
The public may view background
documentation for this information
collection at the following Web site:
www.reginfo.gov. Comments should be
directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the
Securities and Exchange Commission,
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Room 10102, New Executive
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503,
or by sending an email to: Shagufta_
Ahmed@omb.eop.gov; and (ii) Thomas
Bayer, Director/Chief Information
Officer, Securities and Exchange
Commission, c/o Remi Pavlik-Simon,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549, or send an email to: PRA_
Mailbox@sec.gov. Comments must be
submitted to OMB within 30 days of
this notice.
Dated: November 14, 2013.
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–27763 Filed 11–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–70873; File No. SR–ISE–
2013–56]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change To Amend the Schedule of
Fees
November 14, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on November
1, 2013, the International Securities
Exchange, LLC (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or the
‘‘ISE’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission the proposed
rule change, as described in Items I and
II below, which items have been
prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The ISE proposes to amend its
Schedule of Fees. The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Web site (https://
1 15
2 17
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
20NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2013 / Notices
www.ise.com), at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
Mini Options, which are not discussed
below, are and shall continue to be
1/10th of the fees for Standard Options.7
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The self-regulatory organization has
prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
1. Affiliate Definition for Firm Fee Cap
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1. Purpose
The purpose of this proposed rule
change is to amend the Exchange’s
Schedule of Fees (1) to adopt a
definition of ‘‘affiliate’’ for the purpose
of aggregating affiliated Member fees for
the Firm Fee Cap, (2) to increase the
taker fee for Priority Customers 3 in
symbols that are in the Penny Pilot
program (‘‘Select Symbols’’), (3) to
increase the fee charged to Firm
Proprietary 4/Broker-Dealer and
Professional Customers 5 when
providing liquidity in Non-Select
Symbols and FX Options, (4) to replace
the current incremental tier for Priority
Customer Complex average daily
volume (‘‘ADV’’) with a new tier that
applies retroactively to all Priority
Customer complex volume, and (5) to
increase the Credit for Responses to
Flash Orders for trading against Priority
Customers in Select Symbols. Each of
these changes is explained below. The
fee changes discussed apply to both
Standard Options and Mini Options 6
traded on ISE. The Exchange’s Schedule
of Fees has separate tables for fees
applicable to Standard Options and
Mini Options. The Exchange notes that
while the discussion below relates to
fees for Standard Options, the fees for
3 A Priority Customer is defined in ISE Rule
100(a)(37A) as a person or entity that is not a
broker/dealer in securities, and does not place more
than 390 orders in listed options per day on average
during a calendar month for its own beneficial
account(s).
4 A Firm Proprietary order is an order submitted
by a Member for its own proprietary account.
5 A Professional Customer is a person who is not
a broker/dealer and is not a Priority Customer.
6 Mini Options are options overlying ten (10)
shares of AAPL, AMZN, GLD, GOOG and SPY.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:04 Nov 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
The Exchange has a Firm Fee Cap of
$75,000 which applies to Firm
Proprietary and Non-ISE Market Maker 8
transactions that are part of the
originating or contra side of a Crossing
Order.9 In addition to transactions
executed in a Member’s proprietary
account, the fee cap also applies to
crossing transactions for the account of
entities affiliated with a Member.10 For
example, a Member engaged in trading
activity on ISE may have an affiliate
engaged in a market making capacity on
another exchange, which may be a
separate broker/dealer entity. A crossing
transaction by that Member in which a
customer order is facilitated against the
proprietary trading interest of the
Member’s affiliate would be eligible for
the fee cap. To provide more clarity on
what ‘‘affiliated’’ means in this context
the Exchange is now proposing a
definition for this term. In particular,
the Exchange will aggregate the trading
fees of separate Members for purposes of
the Firm Fee Cap provided there is at
least 75% common ownership between
the firms as reflected on each firm’s
Form BD, Schedule A. The Exchange
believes that aggregating fees that count
towards the fee cap across Members that
share at least 75% common ownership
will allow Members to continue to
execute trades on the Exchange through
separate broker-dealer entities for
different types of volume, while
receiving the benefit of the fee cap based
on the aggregate volume being executed
across such entities. The requirement
that affiliates share at least 75%
common ownership is consistent with
the definition of ‘‘affiliate’’ adopted on
the Topaz Exchange, LLC and other
options exchanges.11
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69270
(April 2, 2013), 78 FR 20988 (April 8, 2013) (SR–
ISE–2013–28).
8 A Non-ISE Market Maker, or Far Away Market
Maker (‘‘FARMM’’), is a market maker as defined
in Section 3(a)(38) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 registered in the same options class on
another options exchange.
9 Fees charged by the Exchange for Responses to
Crossing Orders, and surcharge fees charged by the
Exchange for licensed products, are not included in
the calculation of the monthly fee cap. The
Exchange charges a service fee to Members that
have reached the Firm Fee Cap to defray the
Exchange’s costs of providing services.
10 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64274
(April 8, 2011), 76 FR 20754 (April 13, 2012) (SR–
ISE–2011–13).
11 See e.g. Securities Exchange Act Release No.
70670 (October 11, 2013), 78 FR 62815 (October 22,
2013) (SR–Topaz–2013–08).
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69715
2. Priority Customer Taker Fee
The Exchange currently assesses per
contract transaction fees and provides
rebates to market participants that add
or remove liquidity from the Exchange
(‘‘maker/taker fees and rebates’’) in
Select Symbols. For regular orders that
remove liquidity in Select Symbols, the
Exchange currently charges a taker fee
of: (i) $0.34 per contract for Market
Maker 12 and Market Maker Plus 13
orders, (ii) $0.38 per contract for NonISE Market Maker orders, (iii) $0.35 per
contract for Firm Proprietary/BrokerDealer and Professional Customer
orders, and (iv) $0.28 per contract for
Priority Customer orders. The Exchange
now proposes to increase the taker fee
for Priority Customer orders in Select
Symbols from $0.28 per contract to
$0.32 per contract. The Exchange is not
proposing any change to this taker fee
for any other market participants.
3. Discount for Adding Liquidity in
Non-Select Symbols and FX Options
In June 2013, as an incentive to route
liquidity-adding order flow to ISE, the
Exchange adopted a discounted fee of
$0.20 per contract for Firm Proprietary/
Broker-Dealer and Professional
Customers when providing liquidity in
Non-Select Symbols and FX Options.14
For removing liquidity, these market
participants are charged a fee of $0.30
per contract. The Exchange has
determined to no longer provide this
incentive for adding liquidity in NonSelect Symbols and FX Options, and is
therefore proposing to charge the same
$0.30 per contract fee to these market
participants for adding liquidity as it
charges for removing liquidity. Charging
the same fee for adding and removing
liquidity is consistent with the
Exchange’s past practice, and with the
Exchange’s general pricing structure for
Non-Select Symbols and FX Options,
which does not differentiate between
making and taking liquidity.
4. Priority Customer Complex Order
Tiers
The Exchange currently provides
volume-based tiered rebates for Priority
Customer complex orders when these
orders trade with non-Priority Customer
12 The term ‘‘Market Makers’’ refers to
‘‘Competitive Market Makers’’ and ‘‘Primary Market
Makers’’ collectively. See ISE Rule 100(a)(25).
13 In order to promote liquidity in Select Symbols,
the Exchange offers a rebate for adding liquidity to
certain Market Makers (‘‘Market Maker Plus’’) if the
quotes they send to the Exchange qualify the Market
Maker to become a Market Maker Plus.
14 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69757
(June 13, 2013), 78 FR 36812 (June 19, 2013) (SR–
ISE–2013–36).
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
69716
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2013 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
orders in the complex order book,15 or
trade with quotes and orders on the
regular order book.16 These complex
order rebates are provided to Members
based on the Member’s ADV in Priority
Customer complex contracts. For
example, a Member that executes an
ADV of at least 225,000 Priority
Customer complex contracts will be
entitled to a rebate of $0.40 per contract
for Select Symbols (excluding SPY),
$0.41 per contract for SPY, and $0.78
per contract for non-Select Symbols, in
each case when trading with nonPriority Customer orders in the complex
order book. When trading against quotes
and orders on the regular order book
this rebate is $0.18 per contract
(excluding SPY) and $0.19 per contract
for SPY. In March 2013 the Exchange
introduced a new incremental tier to
incentivize Members to increase the
amount of Priority Customer complex
orders that they send to the Exchange.
Members that execute Priority Customer
Complex ADV above 225,000 contracts
are entitled to an additional rebate of
$0.01 per contract when trading with
non-Priority Customers in the complex
order book.17 Unlike the other five
volume tiers, the incremental volume
tier is not retroactive and is payable
only for incremental Priority Customer
complex order volume above the highest
tier. The Exchange is proposing to
eliminate the incremental volume tier,
and instead adopt a new volume tier
that applies to Members that execute a
Priority Customer Complex ADV of at
least 300,000 contracts. Like the other
existing volume tiers, this new volume
tier will apply retroactively to all
Priority Customer complex order
volume once the threshold has been
reached. And, similar to the incremental
tier that it replaces, Members that
achieve the new tier will be entitled to
a rebate that is $0.01 per contract greater
than the rebate for Members that
achieve the next highest tier. The new
tier will, however, apply to both orders
that trade with non-Priority Customer
orders in the complex order book and
orders that trade with quotes and orders
on the regular order book. Specifically,
the proposed rebate amounts for this
15 The Exchange offers a rebate in Standard and
Mini Options for Priority Customer complex orders
in (i) Select Symbols (excluding SPY), (ii) SPY, and
(iii) Non-Select Symbols, when these orders trade
with non-Priority Customer orders in the complex
order book.
16 The Exchange offers a rebate in Standard and
Mini Options for Priority Customer complex orders
that trade with quotes and orders on the regular
order book in (i) SPY, and (ii) other symbols
excluding SPY.
17 The incremental rebate does not apply to
Priority Customer Complex orders that trade with
quotes or orders on the regular order book.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:04 Nov 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
volume tier will be as follows: the rebate
for Select Symbols (excluding SPY) will
be $0.41 per contract, the rebate for SPY
will be $0.42 per contract, and the
rebate for Non-Select Symbols will be
$0.79 per contract, in each case when
trading with non-Priority Customer
orders in the complex order book. When
trading with quotes and orders on the
regular order book the proposed rebate
will be $0.19 per contract (excluding
SPY) and $0.20 per contract for SPY.
With this proposed change the
Exchange expects to attract additional
Priority Customer complex order
volume to the ISE.
5. Credit for Responses To Flash Orders
Currently, when ISE is not at the
National Best Bid or Offer (‘‘NBBO’’),
Public Customer and Non-Customer
orders are exposed to all ISE members
to give them an opportunity to match
the NBBO (‘‘Flash Orders’’) before the
order is routed to another exchange for
execution or cancelled. As an incentive
to attract Public Customer orders to the
ISE, the Exchange offers a Credit for
Responses to Flash Orders in Select and
Non-Select Symbols when trading
against Priority and Professional
Customers.18 For Select Symbols, this
credit is $0.10 per contract when trading
against each of Priority and Professional
Customers. When an ISE Market Maker
trades against a Preferenced Priority
Customer, i.e., a Priority Customer order
that is preferenced to that Market
Maker, the credit is $0.12 per contract.
In non-Select Symbols the credit is
$0.20 per contract when trading against
Professional Customers only. The
Exchange now proposes to increase the
Credit for Responses to Flash Orders in
Select Symbols from $0.10 per contract
to $0.15 per contract when trading
against Priority Customers, and from
$0.12 per contract to $0.17 per contract
when trading against Preferenced
Priority Customers.19 The respective
credits for trading against a Professional
Customer in Select and Non-Select
Symbols will remain at their current
rates.
2. Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,20
18 No fee is charged or credit provided when
trading against a non-Customer.
19 The Exchange notes that it does not apply a
special credit for trading against a Preferenced
Priority Customer in Mini Options. The credit for
trading against a Priority Customer in Mini Options
will be $0.015 per contract when trading against
Priority Customers in Select Symbols regardless of
whether the order has been preferenced to a Market
Maker.
20 15 U.S.C. 78f.
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
in general, and Section 6(b)(4) of the
Act,21 in particular, in that it is designed
to provide for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges
among its members and other persons
using its facilities.
1. Affiliate Definition for Firm Fee Cap
The language permitting aggregation
of corporate affiliates for purposes of the
Firm Fee Cap is intended to avoid
disparate treatment of firms that have
divided their various business activities
between separate corporate entities as
compared to firms that operate those
business activities within a single
corporate entity. By way of example,
many firms that are Members of the
Exchange operate several different
business lines within the same
corporate entity. In contrast, other firms
may be part of a corporate structure that
separates those business lines into
different corporate affiliates, either for
business, compliance or historical
reasons. Those corporate affiliates, in
turn, are required to maintain separate
memberships with the Exchange in
order to access the Exchange. The
Exchange believes that the trading
activity of corporate affiliates should
continue to be aggregated for purposes
of the Firm Fee Cap, and is adopting a
definition of affiliate to clarify when
Members will be considered affiliated.
The Exchange notes that the proposed
definition of ‘‘affiliate’’ is consistent
with definitions used by other options
exchanges, including the Topaz
Exchange, LLC, the Chicago Board
Options Exchange, Inc., and the MIAX
Options Exchange.22 The Exchange is
not proposing any substantive changes
to the Firm Fee Cap.
2. Priority Customer Taker Fee
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to assess a $0.32 per contract
taker fee for all regular Priority
Customer orders in Select Symbols is
reasonable and equitable because the fee
is within the range of fees assessed by
other exchanges employing similar
pricing schemes. While the Exchange is
proposing a fee increase, the proposed
fee is substantially lower, for example,
than the $0.45 per contract taker fee
currently charged by the NASDAQ
Options Market (‘‘NOM’’) for Customer
orders in penny pilot symbols.23 The
21 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
ISE Gemini Schedule of Fees, Section I,
Regular Order Fees and Rebates for Standard
Options, and Section II, Regular Order Fees and
Rebates for Mini Options; CBOE Fee Schedule,
Volume Incentive Program (VIP); MIAX Fee
Schedule, Transaction Fees, Exchange Fees, Priority
Customer Rebate Program.
23 See NOM Rules, Chapter XV Options Pricing,
Sec. 2 NASDAQ Options Market—Fees and Rebates.
22 See
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2013 / Notices
Exchange also notes that with this
proposed fee change, the fee charged to
Priority Customer orders will remain
lower (as it historically has always been)
than the fee currently charged by the
Exchange to other market participants.
The Exchange believes that it is
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to increase the Priority
Customer taker fee, as Priority
Customers will continue to be assessed
lower fees than other market
participants.
3. Discount for Adding Liquidity in
Non-Select Symbols and FX Options
The Exchange believes that it is
reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly
discriminatory to no longer provide a
discounted fee for providing liquidity in
Non-Select Symbols and FX Options as
it has determined it is no longer
necessary provide this incentive. Firm
Proprietary/Broker-Dealer and
Professional Customers will once again
pay the same fee regardless of whether
they are adding or removing liquidity,
as was the case prior to the June 2013
rule change. This is consistent with the
Exchange’s general pricing structure for
Non-Select Symbols and FX Options,
which does not differentiate between
making and taking liquidity.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
4. Priority Customer Complex Order
Tiers
The Exchange believes that it is
reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly
discriminatory to provide rebates for
Priority Customer complex orders when
these orders trade with non-Priority
Customer orders in the complex order
book, or trade with quotes and orders on
the regular order book, because paying
a rebate will continue to attract
additional order flow to the ISE and
create liquidity which will ultimately
benefit all market participants who
trade on the Exchange. The Exchange
has already established a volume-based
incentive program, and is now merely
proposing to replace its incremental
volume tier with a new tier that applies
retroactively to all Priority Customer
complex order volume. The Exchange
believes that the proposal will
encourage Members to route additional
Priority Customer complex orders to the
Exchange in order to qualify for the new
rebates, which would be applicable to
all of a Member’s Priority Customer
complex order volume. The Exchange
believes that the retroactive rebates
being proposed for Members that
achieve the new sixth tier will help it
remain competitive with other options
exchanges in attracting this order flow.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:04 Nov 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
5. Credit for Responses To Flash Orders
The Exchange believes that it is
reasonable and equitable to increase the
credit for responding to Priority
Customer orders flashed on the
Exchange to encourage market
participants to respond to these Flash
Orders, and thereby attract Priority
Customer order flow to the Exchange.
The Exchange believes that the
increased rebate will also result in fewer
orders being subject to linkage handling,
which will reduce costs for the
Exchange and market participants.
Furthermore, the Exchange believes that
it is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to provide a larger credit
to market participants that trade against
Priority Customer orders than those that
trade against Professional Customer
orders in Select Symbols. A Priority
Customer is by definition not a broker
or dealer in securities, and does not
place more than 390 orders in listed
options per day on average during a
calendar month for its own beneficial
account(s). This limitation does not
apply to participants on the Exchange
whose behavior is substantially similar
to that of market professionals,
including Professional Customers, who
will generally submit a higher number
of orders (many of which do not result
in executions) than Priority Customers.
The Exchange believes that attracting
more liquidity from Priority Customers
will benefit all market participants that
trade on the ISE.
The Exchange notes that it has
determined to charge fees and provide
rebates in Mini Options at a rate that is
1/10th the rate of fees and rebates the
Exchange provides for trading in
Standard Options. The Exchange
believes it is reasonable and equitable
and not unfairly discriminatory to
assess lower fees and rebates to provide
market participants an incentive to trade
Mini Options on the Exchange. The
Exchange believes the proposed fees
and rebates are reasonable and equitable
in light of the fact that Mini Options
have a smaller exercise and assignment
value, specifically 1/10th that of a
standard option contract, and, as such,
is providing fees and rebates for Mini
Options that are 1/10th of those
applicable to Standard Options.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of
the Act,24 the Exchange does not believe
that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on intermarket or
intramarket competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
Exchange notes that other exchanges
have substantially similar requirements
for aggregating affiliated Member ADV.
As provided in the initial Firm Fee Cap
filing, the Exchange currently aggregates
affiliated Member fees, and this
proposed rule change merely explains
the how affiliate status is determined for
that purpose, which will have no
competitive impact. With respect to the
other proposed fee changes, the
Exchange believes that the proposed
changes will promote competition, as
they are designed to allow ISE to better
compete for order flow and improve the
Exchange’s competitive position, for
example, by offering higher rebates to
market participants that execute a large
volume of Priority Customer complex
orders, or respond to Priority Customer
Flash Orders. While the Exchange is
increasing certain fees, the Exchange
believes that this does not impose a
burden on competition because the new
fees are consistent with those charged
by other options exchanges. The
Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market in which market
participants can readily direct their
order flow to competing venues. In such
an environment, the Exchange must
continually review, and consider
adjusting, its fees and rebates to remain
competitive with other exchanges. For
the reasons described above, the
Exchange believes that the proposed fee
changes reflect this competitive
environment.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and
does not intend to solicit, comments on
this proposed rule change. The
Exchange has not received any
unsolicited written comments From
members or other interested parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 25 and paragraph (f) of Rule
19b–4 thereunder.26 At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
25 15
24 15
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
26 17
Sfmt 4703
69717
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f).
20NON1
69718
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2013 / Notices
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
No. SR–ISE–2013–56 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–ISE–2013–56. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commissions
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the ISE. All comments received
will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–ISE–
2013–56 and should be submitted by
December 11, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.27
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–27753 Filed 11–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–70872; File No. SR–ISE–
2013–57]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change To Amend the Schedule of
Fees
November 14, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on November
1, 2013, the International Securities
Exchange, LLC (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or the
‘‘ISE’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission the proposed
rule change, as described in Items I and
II below, which items have been
prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The ISE proposes to amend its
Schedule of Fees. The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange’s Web site (https://
www.ise.com), at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The self-regulatory organization has
prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B and C below, of the most
significant aspects of such statements.
1 15
27 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:04 Nov 19, 2013
2 17
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this proposed rule
change is to amend the Exchange’s
Schedule of Fees to increase the Market
Maker Plus rebate for Market Makers 3
that meet certain additional
qualification standards. The Exchange
assesses a per contract transaction
charge and provides rebates to market
participants that add or remove
liquidity from the Exchange (‘‘maker/
taker fees and rebates’’) in all symbols
that are in the Penny Pilot program
(‘‘Select Symbols’’). In order to promote
and encourage liquidity in Select
Symbols, the Exchange currently offers
Market Makers that meet the quoting
requirements for Market Maker Plus a
rebate of $0.10 per contract in Standard
Options, and $0.010 per contract in
Mini Options, for adding liquidity in
those symbols.4 The Exchange now
proposes to pay a higher rebate of $0.12
per contract and $0.012 per contract for
Standard and Mini Options,
respectively, to Market Makers that meet
the quoting requirements for Market
Maker Plus and are affiliated with an
Electronic Access Member that executes
a total affiliated Priority Customer 5
average daily volume (‘‘ADV’’) of
200,000 contracts in a calendar month.6
3 The term ‘‘Market Makers’’ refers to
‘‘Competitive Market Makers’’ and ‘‘Primary Market
Makers’’ collectively. See ISE Rule 100(a)(25).
4 A Market Maker qualifies for Market Maker Plus
if it is on the National Best Bid or National Best
Offer 80% of the time for series trading between
$0.03 and $5.00 (for options whose underlying
stock’s previous trading day’s last sale price was
less than or equal to $100) and between $0.10 and
$5.00 (for options whose underlying stock’s
previous trading day’s last sale price was greater
than $100) in premium in each of the front two
expiration months and 80% of the time for series
trading between $0.03 and $5.00 (for options whose
underlying stock’s previous trading day’s last sale
price was less than or equal to $100) and between
$0.10 and $5.00 (for options whose underlying
stock’s previous trading day’s last sale price was
greater than $100) in premium for all expiration
months in that symbol during the current trading
month. A Market Maker’s single best and single
worst overall quoting days each month, on a per
symbol basis, are excluded in calculating whether
a Market Maker qualifies for Market Maker Plus, if
doing so will qualify a Market Maker for the rebate.
5 A Priority Customer is defined in ISE Rule
100(a)(37A) as a person or entity that is not a
broker/dealer in securities, and does not place more
than 390 orders in listed options per day on average
during a calendar month for its own beneficial
account(s).
6 Priority Customer ADV includes all volume in
all symbols and order types. Volume in Standard
Options and Mini Options will be combined to
calculate Priority Customer ADV but Market Makers
will be rebated for all Standard Options traded at
the Standard Option rebate amount and for all the
E:\FR\FM\20NON1.SGM
20NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 224 (Wednesday, November 20, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69714-69718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27753]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-70873; File No. SR-ISE-2013-56]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change To Amend the Schedule of Fees
November 14, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on November 1, 2013, the International Securities Exchange, LLC
(the ``Exchange'' or the ``ISE'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission the proposed rule change, as described in Items I
and II below, which items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The ISE proposes to amend its Schedule of Fees. The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site (https://
[[Page 69715]]
www.ise.com), at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization
has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this proposed rule change is to amend the Exchange's
Schedule of Fees (1) to adopt a definition of ``affiliate'' for the
purpose of aggregating affiliated Member fees for the Firm Fee Cap, (2)
to increase the taker fee for Priority Customers \3\ in symbols that
are in the Penny Pilot program (``Select Symbols''), (3) to increase
the fee charged to Firm Proprietary \4\/Broker[hyphen]Dealer and
Professional Customers \5\ when providing liquidity in Non-Select
Symbols and FX Options, (4) to replace the current incremental tier for
Priority Customer Complex average daily volume (``ADV'') with a new
tier that applies retroactively to all Priority Customer complex
volume, and (5) to increase the Credit for Responses to Flash Orders
for trading against Priority Customers in Select Symbols. Each of these
changes is explained below. The fee changes discussed apply to both
Standard Options and Mini Options \6\ traded on ISE. The Exchange's
Schedule of Fees has separate tables for fees applicable to Standard
Options and Mini Options. The Exchange notes that while the discussion
below relates to fees for Standard Options, the fees for Mini Options,
which are not discussed below, are and shall continue to be 1/10th of
the fees for Standard Options.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ A Priority Customer is defined in ISE Rule 100(a)(37A) as a
person or entity that is not a broker/dealer in securities, and does
not place more than 390 orders in listed options per day on average
during a calendar month for its own beneficial account(s).
\4\ A Firm Proprietary order is an order submitted by a Member
for its own proprietary account.
\5\ A Professional Customer is a person who is not a broker/
dealer and is not a Priority Customer.
\6\ Mini Options are options overlying ten (10) shares of AAPL,
AMZN, GLD, GOOG and SPY.
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69270 (April 2,
2013), 78 FR 20988 (April 8, 2013) (SR-ISE-2013-28).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Affiliate Definition for Firm Fee Cap
The Exchange has a Firm Fee Cap of $75,000 which applies to Firm
Proprietary and Non[hyphen]ISE Market Maker \8\ transactions that are
part of the originating or contra side of a Crossing Order.\9\ In
addition to transactions executed in a Member's proprietary account,
the fee cap also applies to crossing transactions for the account of
entities affiliated with a Member.\10\ For example, a Member engaged in
trading activity on ISE may have an affiliate engaged in a market
making capacity on another exchange, which may be a separate broker/
dealer entity. A crossing transaction by that Member in which a
customer order is facilitated against the proprietary trading interest
of the Member's affiliate would be eligible for the fee cap. To provide
more clarity on what ``affiliated'' means in this context the Exchange
is now proposing a definition for this term. In particular, the
Exchange will aggregate the trading fees of separate Members for
purposes of the Firm Fee Cap provided there is at least 75% common
ownership between the firms as reflected on each firm's Form BD,
Schedule A. The Exchange believes that aggregating fees that count
towards the fee cap across Members that share at least 75% common
ownership will allow Members to continue to execute trades on the
Exchange through separate broker-dealer entities for different types of
volume, while receiving the benefit of the fee cap based on the
aggregate volume being executed across such entities. The requirement
that affiliates share at least 75% common ownership is consistent with
the definition of ``affiliate'' adopted on the Topaz Exchange, LLC and
other options exchanges.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ A Non-ISE Market Maker, or Far Away Market Maker
(``FARMM''), is a market maker as defined in Section 3(a)(38) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 registered in the same options class
on another options exchange.
\9\ Fees charged by the Exchange for Responses to Crossing
Orders, and surcharge fees charged by the Exchange for licensed
products, are not included in the calculation of the monthly fee
cap. The Exchange charges a service fee to Members that have reached
the Firm Fee Cap to defray the Exchange's costs of providing
services.
\10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64274 (April 8,
2011), 76 FR 20754 (April 13, 2012) (SR-ISE-2011-13).
\11\ See e.g. Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70670 (October
11, 2013), 78 FR 62815 (October 22, 2013) (SR-Topaz-2013-08).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Priority Customer Taker Fee
The Exchange currently assesses per contract transaction fees and
provides rebates to market participants that add or remove liquidity
from the Exchange (``maker/taker fees and rebates'') in Select Symbols.
For regular orders that remove liquidity in Select Symbols, the
Exchange currently charges a taker fee of: (i) $0.34 per contract for
Market Maker \12\ and Market Maker Plus \13\ orders, (ii) $0.38 per
contract for Non-ISE Market Maker orders, (iii) $0.35 per contract for
Firm Proprietary/Broker-Dealer and Professional Customer orders, and
(iv) $0.28 per contract for Priority Customer orders. The Exchange now
proposes to increase the taker fee for Priority Customer orders in
Select Symbols from $0.28 per contract to $0.32 per contract. The
Exchange is not proposing any change to this taker fee for any other
market participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ The term ``Market Makers'' refers to ``Competitive Market
Makers'' and ``Primary Market Makers'' collectively. See ISE Rule
100(a)(25).
\13\ In order to promote liquidity in Select Symbols, the
Exchange offers a rebate for adding liquidity to certain Market
Makers (``Market Maker Plus'') if the quotes they send to the
Exchange qualify the Market Maker to become a Market Maker Plus.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Discount for Adding Liquidity in Non-Select Symbols and FX Options
In June 2013, as an incentive to route liquidity-adding order flow
to ISE, the Exchange adopted a discounted fee of $0.20 per contract for
Firm Proprietary/Broker[hyphen]Dealer and Professional Customers when
providing liquidity in Non-Select Symbols and FX Options.\14\ For
removing liquidity, these market participants are charged a fee of
$0.30 per contract. The Exchange has determined to no longer provide
this incentive for adding liquidity in Non-Select Symbols and FX
Options, and is therefore proposing to charge the same $0.30 per
contract fee to these market participants for adding liquidity as it
charges for removing liquidity. Charging the same fee for adding and
removing liquidity is consistent with the Exchange's past practice, and
with the Exchange's general pricing structure for Non-Select Symbols
and FX Options, which does not differentiate between making and taking
liquidity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 69757 (June 13,
2013), 78 FR 36812 (June 19, 2013) (SR-ISE-2013-36).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Priority Customer Complex Order Tiers
The Exchange currently provides volume-based tiered rebates for
Priority Customer complex orders when these orders trade with non-
Priority Customer
[[Page 69716]]
orders in the complex order book,\15\ or trade with quotes and orders
on the regular order book.\16\ These complex order rebates are provided
to Members based on the Member's ADV in Priority Customer complex
contracts. For example, a Member that executes an ADV of at least
225,000 Priority Customer complex contracts will be entitled to a
rebate of $0.40 per contract for Select Symbols (excluding SPY), $0.41
per contract for SPY, and $0.78 per contract for non-Select Symbols, in
each case when trading with non-Priority Customer orders in the complex
order book. When trading against quotes and orders on the regular order
book this rebate is $0.18 per contract (excluding SPY) and $0.19 per
contract for SPY. In March 2013 the Exchange introduced a new
incremental tier to incentivize Members to increase the amount of
Priority Customer complex orders that they send to the Exchange.
Members that execute Priority Customer Complex ADV above 225,000
contracts are entitled to an additional rebate of $0.01 per contract
when trading with non-Priority Customers in the complex order book.\17\
Unlike the other five volume tiers, the incremental volume tier is not
retroactive and is payable only for incremental Priority Customer
complex order volume above the highest tier. The Exchange is proposing
to eliminate the incremental volume tier, and instead adopt a new
volume tier that applies to Members that execute a Priority Customer
Complex ADV of at least 300,000 contracts. Like the other existing
volume tiers, this new volume tier will apply retroactively to all
Priority Customer complex order volume once the threshold has been
reached. And, similar to the incremental tier that it replaces, Members
that achieve the new tier will be entitled to a rebate that is $0.01
per contract greater than the rebate for Members that achieve the next
highest tier. The new tier will, however, apply to both orders that
trade with non-Priority Customer orders in the complex order book and
orders that trade with quotes and orders on the regular order book.
Specifically, the proposed rebate amounts for this volume tier will be
as follows: the rebate for Select Symbols (excluding SPY) will be $0.41
per contract, the rebate for SPY will be $0.42 per contract, and the
rebate for Non-Select Symbols will be $0.79 per contract, in each case
when trading with non-Priority Customer orders in the complex order
book. When trading with quotes and orders on the regular order book the
proposed rebate will be $0.19 per contract (excluding SPY) and $0.20
per contract for SPY. With this proposed change the Exchange expects to
attract additional Priority Customer complex order volume to the ISE.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ The Exchange offers a rebate in Standard and Mini Options
for Priority Customer complex orders in (i) Select Symbols
(excluding SPY), (ii) SPY, and (iii) Non-Select Symbols, when these
orders trade with non-Priority Customer orders in the complex order
book.
\16\ The Exchange offers a rebate in Standard and Mini Options
for Priority Customer complex orders that trade with quotes and
orders on the regular order book in (i) SPY, and (ii) other symbols
excluding SPY.
\17\ The incremental rebate does not apply to Priority Customer
Complex orders that trade with quotes or orders on the regular order
book.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Credit for Responses To Flash Orders
Currently, when ISE is not at the National Best Bid or Offer
(``NBBO''), Public Customer and Non-Customer orders are exposed to all
ISE members to give them an opportunity to match the NBBO (``Flash
Orders'') before the order is routed to another exchange for execution
or cancelled. As an incentive to attract Public Customer orders to the
ISE, the Exchange offers a Credit for Responses to Flash Orders in
Select and Non-Select Symbols when trading against Priority and
Professional Customers.\18\ For Select Symbols, this credit is $0.10
per contract when trading against each of Priority and Professional
Customers. When an ISE Market Maker trades against a Preferenced
Priority Customer, i.e., a Priority Customer order that is preferenced
to that Market Maker, the credit is $0.12 per contract. In non-Select
Symbols the credit is $0.20 per contract when trading against
Professional Customers only. The Exchange now proposes to increase the
Credit for Responses to Flash Orders in Select Symbols from $0.10 per
contract to $0.15 per contract when trading against Priority Customers,
and from $0.12 per contract to $0.17 per contract when trading against
Preferenced Priority Customers.\19\ The respective credits for trading
against a Professional Customer in Select and Non-Select Symbols will
remain at their current rates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ No fee is charged or credit provided when trading against a
non-Customer.
\19\ The Exchange notes that it does not apply a special credit
for trading against a Preferenced Priority Customer in Mini Options.
The credit for trading against a Priority Customer in Mini Options
will be $0.015 per contract when trading against Priority Customers
in Select Symbols regardless of whether the order has been
preferenced to a Market Maker.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\20\ in general, and
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\21\ in particular, in that it is designed
to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among its members and other persons using its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
\21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Affiliate Definition for Firm Fee Cap
The language permitting aggregation of corporate affiliates for
purposes of the Firm Fee Cap is intended to avoid disparate treatment
of firms that have divided their various business activities between
separate corporate entities as compared to firms that operate those
business activities within a single corporate entity. By way of
example, many firms that are Members of the Exchange operate several
different business lines within the same corporate entity. In contrast,
other firms may be part of a corporate structure that separates those
business lines into different corporate affiliates, either for
business, compliance or historical reasons. Those corporate affiliates,
in turn, are required to maintain separate memberships with the
Exchange in order to access the Exchange. The Exchange believes that
the trading activity of corporate affiliates should continue to be
aggregated for purposes of the Firm Fee Cap, and is adopting a
definition of affiliate to clarify when Members will be considered
affiliated. The Exchange notes that the proposed definition of
``affiliate'' is consistent with definitions used by other options
exchanges, including the Topaz Exchange, LLC, the Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Inc., and the MIAX Options Exchange.\22\ The Exchange is not
proposing any substantive changes to the Firm Fee Cap.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See ISE Gemini Schedule of Fees, Section I, Regular Order
Fees and Rebates for Standard Options, and Section II, Regular Order
Fees and Rebates for Mini Options; CBOE Fee Schedule, Volume
Incentive Program (VIP); MIAX Fee Schedule, Transaction Fees,
Exchange Fees, Priority Customer Rebate Program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Priority Customer Taker Fee
The Exchange believes that its proposal to assess a $0.32 per
contract taker fee for all regular Priority Customer orders in Select
Symbols is reasonable and equitable because the fee is within the range
of fees assessed by other exchanges employing similar pricing schemes.
While the Exchange is proposing a fee increase, the proposed fee is
substantially lower, for example, than the $0.45 per contract taker fee
currently charged by the NASDAQ Options Market (``NOM'') for Customer
orders in penny pilot symbols.\23\ The
[[Page 69717]]
Exchange also notes that with this proposed fee change, the fee charged
to Priority Customer orders will remain lower (as it historically has
always been) than the fee currently charged by the Exchange to other
market participants. The Exchange believes that it is equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory to increase the Priority Customer taker fee, as
Priority Customers will continue to be assessed lower fees than other
market participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ See NOM Rules, Chapter XV Options Pricing, Sec. 2 NASDAQ
Options Market--Fees and Rebates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Discount for Adding Liquidity in Non-Select Symbols and FX Options
The Exchange believes that it is reasonable, equitable, and not
unfairly discriminatory to no longer provide a discounted fee for
providing liquidity in Non-Select Symbols and FX Options as it has
determined it is no longer necessary provide this incentive. Firm
Proprietary/Broker[hyphen]Dealer and Professional Customers will once
again pay the same fee regardless of whether they are adding or
removing liquidity, as was the case prior to the June 2013 rule change.
This is consistent with the Exchange's general pricing structure for
Non-Select Symbols and FX Options, which does not differentiate between
making and taking liquidity.
4. Priority Customer Complex Order Tiers
The Exchange believes that it is reasonable, equitable, and not
unfairly discriminatory to provide rebates for Priority Customer
complex orders when these orders trade with non-Priority Customer
orders in the complex order book, or trade with quotes and orders on
the regular order book, because paying a rebate will continue to
attract additional order flow to the ISE and create liquidity which
will ultimately benefit all market participants who trade on the
Exchange. The Exchange has already established a volume-based incentive
program, and is now merely proposing to replace its incremental volume
tier with a new tier that applies retroactively to all Priority
Customer complex order volume. The Exchange believes that the proposal
will encourage Members to route additional Priority Customer complex
orders to the Exchange in order to qualify for the new rebates, which
would be applicable to all of a Member's Priority Customer complex
order volume. The Exchange believes that the retroactive rebates being
proposed for Members that achieve the new sixth tier will help it
remain competitive with other options exchanges in attracting this
order flow.
5. Credit for Responses To Flash Orders
The Exchange believes that it is reasonable and equitable to
increase the credit for responding to Priority Customer orders flashed
on the Exchange to encourage market participants to respond to these
Flash Orders, and thereby attract Priority Customer order flow to the
Exchange. The Exchange believes that the increased rebate will also
result in fewer orders being subject to linkage handling, which will
reduce costs for the Exchange and market participants. Furthermore, the
Exchange believes that it is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory
to provide a larger credit to market participants that trade against
Priority Customer orders than those that trade against Professional
Customer orders in Select Symbols. A Priority Customer is by definition
not a broker or dealer in securities, and does not place more than 390
orders in listed options per day on average during a calendar month for
its own beneficial account(s). This limitation does not apply to
participants on the Exchange whose behavior is substantially similar to
that of market professionals, including Professional Customers, who
will generally submit a higher number of orders (many of which do not
result in executions) than Priority Customers. The Exchange believes
that attracting more liquidity from Priority Customers will benefit all
market participants that trade on the ISE.
The Exchange notes that it has determined to charge fees and
provide rebates in Mini Options at a rate that is 1/10th the rate of
fees and rebates the Exchange provides for trading in Standard Options.
The Exchange believes it is reasonable and equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to assess lower fees and rebates to provide market
participants an incentive to trade Mini Options on the Exchange. The
Exchange believes the proposed fees and rebates are reasonable and
equitable in light of the fact that Mini Options have a smaller
exercise and assignment value, specifically 1/10th that of a standard
option contract, and, as such, is providing fees and rebates for Mini
Options that are 1/10th of those applicable to Standard Options.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\24\ the Exchange
does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden
on intermarket or intramarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange
notes that other exchanges have substantially similar requirements for
aggregating affiliated Member ADV. As provided in the initial Firm Fee
Cap filing, the Exchange currently aggregates affiliated Member fees,
and this proposed rule change merely explains the how affiliate status
is determined for that purpose, which will have no competitive impact.
With respect to the other proposed fee changes, the Exchange believes
that the proposed changes will promote competition, as they are
designed to allow ISE to better compete for order flow and improve the
Exchange's competitive position, for example, by offering higher
rebates to market participants that execute a large volume of Priority
Customer complex orders, or respond to Priority Customer Flash Orders.
While the Exchange is increasing certain fees, the Exchange believes
that this does not impose a burden on competition because the new fees
are consistent with those charged by other options exchanges. The
Exchange operates in a highly competitive market in which market
participants can readily direct their order flow to competing venues.
In such an environment, the Exchange must continually review, and
consider adjusting, its fees and rebates to remain competitive with
other exchanges. For the reasons described above, the Exchange believes
that the proposed fee changes reflect this competitive environment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others
The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments From members or other interested
parties.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \25\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4
thereunder.\26\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of
[[Page 69718]]
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\26\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File No. SR-ISE-2013-56 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2013-56. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commissions Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington,
DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the ISE. All comments received
will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2013-56 and should be submitted by
December 11, 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\27\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-27753 Filed 11-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
