Removal of Attestation Process for Facilities Using H-1A Registered Nurses, 69539-69541 [2013-27683]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
of Executive Order 12866. Therefore, the
information enumerated in section
6(a)(3)(C) of the order is not required.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rescission is not a ‘‘rule’’ as
defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601(2), nor is it a ‘‘final
rule’’ following a notice of proposed
rulemaking as defined in the RFA, 5
U.S.C. 604(a). Therefore, the RFA does
not apply and the Department is not
required to either certify that the rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities or conduct a regulatory
flexibility analysis.
C. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This rule will not include any Federal
mandate that may result in increased
expenditures by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, of $100
million or more, or in increased
expenditures by the private sector of
$100 million or more.
D. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by section 804 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996. This rule will not
result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100,000,000 or more; a
major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of the United States-based
companies to compete with foreign
based companies in domestic and
export markets.
Indian Tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
As a result, no Tribal summary impact
statement has been prepared.
workers, Passports and visas, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Unemployment, Wages,
Working conditions.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated
herein, the Department hereby amends
20 CFR part 655 as follows:
G. Assessment of Federal Regulations
and Policies on Families
PART 655—TEMPORARY
EMPLOYMENT OF FOREIGN
WORKERS IN THE UNITED STATES
Section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, enacted as part of the Omnibus
Consolidated and Emergency
Supplemental Appropriations Act of
1999 (Pub. L. 105–277, 112 Stat. 2681)
requires the Department to assess the
impact of this rule on family well-being.
A rule that is determined to have a
negative effect on families must be
supported with an adequate rationale.
The Department has assessed this rule
and determines that it will not have a
negative effect on families.
H. Executive Order 12630
This rule is not subject to E.O. 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference
With Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights, because it does not
involve implementation of a policy with
takings implications.
I. Executive Order 12988
This regulation has been drafted and
reviewed in accordance with E.O.
12988, Civil Justice Reform, and will not
unduly burden the Federal court
system. The regulation has been written
to minimize litigation and provide a
clear legal standard for affected conduct,
and has been reviewed carefully to
eliminate drafting errors and
ambiguities.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
E. Executive Order 13132
The Department has reviewed this
rule in accordance with E.O. 13132
regarding federalism and has
determined that it does not have
federalism implications. The rule does
not have substantial direct effects on
States, on the relationship between the
States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various
levels of Government as described by
E.O. 13132. Therefore, the Department
has determined that this rule will not
have a sufficient federalism implication
to warrant the preparation of a summary
impact statement.
J. Plain Language
F. Executive Order 13175
This rule was reviewed under the
terms of E.O. 13175 regarding Indian
Tribal Governments and was
determined not to have Tribal
implications. The rule does not have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Administrative practice and
procedure, Foreign workers,
Employment, Employment and training,
Enforcement, Forest and forest products,
Fraud, Health professions, Immigration,
Labor, Longshore and harbor work,
Migrant workers, Nonimmigrant
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:56 Nov 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
69539
The Department drafted this rule in
plain language.
K. Executive Order 13211
This rule is not subject to E.O. 13211
regarding Energy Supply. It will not
have a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy.
L. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule contains no new
information collection requirements for
purposes of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects in 20 CFR Part 655
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1. The authority citation for part 655
and the authority citation for subparts J
and K continue to read as follows:
■
Authority: Section 655.0 issued under 8
U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(E)(iii), 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)
and (ii), 8 U.S.C. 1103(a)(6), 1182(m), (n) and
(t), 1184(c), (g), and (j), 1188, and 1288(c) and
(d); sec. 3(c)(1), Pub. L. 101–238, 103 Stat.
2099, 2102 (8 U.S.C. 1182 note); sec. 221(a),
Pub. L. 101–649, 104 Stat. 4978, 5027 (8
U.S.C. 1184 note); sec. 303(a)(8), Pub. L. 102–
232, 105 Stat. 1733, 1748 (8 U.S.C. 1101
note); sec. 323(c), Pub. L. 103–206, 107 Stat.
2428; sec. 412(e), Pub. L. 105–277, 112 Stat.
2681 (8 U.S.C. 1182 note); sec. 2(d), Pub. L.
106–95, 113 Stat. 1312, 1316 (8 U.S.C. 1182
note); 29 U.S.C. 49k; Pub. L. 109–423, 120
Stat. 2900; 8 CFR 214.2(h)(4)(i); and 8 CFR
214.2(h)(6)(iii).
Subparts J and K issued under 29 U.S.C. 49
et seq.; and sec. 221(a), Pub. L. 101–649, 104
Stat. 4978, 5027 (8 U.S.C. 1184 note).
Subpart J—[Removed and Reserved]
2. Remove and reserve subpart J,
consisting of §§ 655.900 through
655.950.
■
Subpart K—[Removed and Reserved]
3. Remove and reserve subpart K,
consisting of §§ 655.1000 through
655.1060.
■
Signed in Washington, DC, this 17th day of
October 2013.
Eric M. Seleznow,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Employment and
Training Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013–27685 Filed 11–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
20 CFR Part 655
RIN 1205–AB67
Removal of Attestation Process for
Facilities Using H–1A Registered
Nurses
Employment and Training
Administration, Department of Labor, in
concurrence with the Wage and Hour
Division, Department of Labor.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\20NOR1.SGM
20NOR1
69540
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
Final rule; rescission of
regulations.
ACTION:
This final rule rescinds the
regulations found which provided rules
governing health care facilities using
nonimmigrant foreign workers as
registered nurses under the H–1A visa
program. These subparts became
obsolete after the authorizing statute
and all extensions expired. Accordingly,
the Department of Labor (the
Department) is taking this action to
remove regulations that no longer have
force and effect.
DATES: Effective November 20, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William L. Carlson, Ph.D.,
Administrator, Office of Foreign Labor
Certification, Room C–4312,
Employment & Training Administration,
U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20210. Telephone number: 202–
693–3010 (this is not a toll-free
number). Individuals with hearing or
speech impairments may access the
telephone number above via TTY by
calling the toll-free Federal Information
Relay Service at 1–877–889–5627 (TTY/
TDD). Fax: 202–693–2768. This notice is
available through the printed Federal
Register, and electronically at https://
www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/
collection.action?collectionCode=FR.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 1989,
Congress created an H–1A
nonimmigrant classification exclusively
for the temporary admission and
employment of registered nurses, which
permitted employers during a five-year
pilot program to hire foreign nurses after
filing a detailed attestation showing the
steps they were taking to lower their
reliance on foreign nurses. Immigration
Nursing Relief Act of 1989 (INRA),
Public Law 101–238, 103 Stat. 2099
(December 18, 1989), amending Sections
101(a)(15)(H)(i) and 212 of the
Immigration and Nationality Act (INA),
8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(a) and
1182(m).1
The H–1A nonimmigrant
classification originally expired on
September 1, 1995. However, on
October 11, 1996, Congress enacted
Public Law 104–302, 110 Stat. 3656,
which extended the authorized period
of stay within the United States for
certain nurses in certain geographic
locations in the United States
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
1 The provisions which INRA added to the INA
were further amended by section 162(f) of the
Immigration Act of 1990 (IMMACT), Public Law
101–649, 104 Stat. 4978 (November 29, 1990), and
by section 302(e)(9) and (10) of the Miscellaneous
and Technical Immigration and Naturalization
Amendments of 1991 (MTINA), Public Law 102–
232, 105 Stat. 1733 (December 12, 1991).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
13:56 Nov 19, 2013
Jkt 232001
experiencing a shortage of registered
nurses. That legislation provided for
extending the stay until September 30,
1997, of certain foreign workers who:
(1) Entered the United States as H–1A
nurses; (2) were within the United
States on or after September 1, 1995,
and who were within the United States
on October 11, 1996; and (3) whose
period of authorized stay had expired or
would expire before September 30, 1997
but for the enactment of the legislation.
Public Law 104–302 did not provide for
the approval of new H–1A petitions and
related solely to extensions of stay for
foreign workers who were in, or had
previously been given, nonimmigrant
H–1A status as registered nurses. In
addition, the legislation did not affect
those in H–1A status whose period of
authorized stay expired after September
30, 1997, and those H–1A nurses were
allowed to remain in the United States
until the validity of their petition
expired, which could have been as late
as August 31, 2000. Congress did not
further extend the stays of any H–1A
nurses, and following the expiration of
all H–1A periods of stay, no foreign
nurses on H–1A visas were employed
after August 31, 2000. Furthermore,
Congress has never renewed the original
H–1A program, and ultimately repealed
it in 1999 in Sec. 2(c) of the Nursing
Relief for Disadvantaged Areas Act of
1999, Public Law 106–095, 113 Stat.
1312, 1316.
The Department implemented the
H–1A program through regulations at 20
CFR part 655 Subparts D and E. See 55
FR 50500 (Dec. 6, 1990), as amended by
59 FR 874 (Jan. 6, 1994). Because of the
expiration of the authorizing legislation,
these regulations are without force and
effect, and must be rescinded.
The Department has determined that
it is unnecessary to publish the
rescission of these regulations as a
proposed rule, as generally required by
the Administrative Procedure Act
(‘‘APA’’), 5 U.S.C. 553(b). Notice to the
public and provision of a public
comment period for this rule is
unnecessary because the enabling
statute has expired, and, consequently,
the regulations are now without force or
effect. 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). Therefore,
good cause exists for dispensing with
the notice and comment requirements of
the APA. 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). For the
same reasons, good cause exists to make
this rule effective immediately upon
publication of this rule. 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3).
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Administrative Information
A. Executive Order 12866
This final rule has been drafted and
reviewed in accordance with Executive
Order 12866, section 1(b), Principles of
Regulation. The Department has
determined that this rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866, section 3(f),
Regulatory Planning and Review. The
Department has also determined that
this rule is not ‘‘economically
significant’’ as defined in section 3(f)(1)
of Executive Order 12866. Therefore, the
information enumerated in section
6(a)(3)(C) of the order is not required.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rescission is not a ‘‘rule’’ as
defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601(2), nor is it a ‘‘final
rule’’ following a notice of proposed
rulemaking as defined in the RFA, 5
U.S.C. 604(a). Therefore, the RFA does
not apply and the Department is not
required to either certify that the rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities or conduct a regulatory
flexibility analysis.
C. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This rule will not include any Federal
mandate that may result in increased
expenditures by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, of $100
million or more, or in increased
expenditures by the private sector of
$100 million or more.
D. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by section 804 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996. This rule will not
result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100,000,000 or more; a
major increase in costs or prices; or
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of the United States-based
companies to compete with foreign
based companies in domestic and
export markets.
E. Executive Order 13132
The Department has reviewed this
rule in accordance with E.O. 13132
regarding federalism and has
determined that it does not have
federalism implications. The rule does
not have substantial direct effects on
States, on the relationship between the
States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various
E:\FR\FM\20NOR1.SGM
20NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2013 / Rules and Regulations
levels of Government as described by
E.O. 13132. Therefore, the Department
has determined that this rule will not
have a sufficient federalism implication
to warrant the preparation of a summary
impact statement.
F. Executive Order 13175
This rule was reviewed under the
terms of E.O. 13175 and determined not
to have Tribal implications. The rule
does not have substantial direct effects
on one or more Indian Tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes, or on
the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes. As a
result, no Tribal summary impact
statement has been prepared.
G. Assessment of Federal Regulations
and Policies on Families
Section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations
Act, enacted as part of the Omnibus
Consolidated and Emergency
Supplemental Appropriations Act of
1999 (Pub. L. 105–277, 112 Stat. 2681)
requires the Department to assess the
impact of this rule on family well-being.
A rule that is determined to have a
negative effect on families must be
supported with an adequate rationale.
The Department has assessed this rule
and determines that it will not have a
negative effect on families.
H. Executive Order 12630
This rule is not subject to E.O. 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference
with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights, because it does not involve
implementation of a policy with takings
implications.
I. Executive Order 12988
This regulation has been drafted and
reviewed in accordance with E.O.
12988, Civil Justice Reform, and will not
unduly burden the Federal court
system. The regulation has been written
to minimize litigation and provide a
clear legal standard for affected conduct,
and has been reviewed carefully to
eliminate drafting errors and
ambiguities.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Employment and Training
Administration
List of Subjects in 20 CFR Part 655
RIN 1205–AB65
Administrative practice and
procedure, Foreign workers,
Employment, Employment and training,
Enforcement, Forest and forest products,
Fraud, Health professions, Immigration,
Labor, Longshore and harbor work,
Migrant workers, Nonimmigrant
workers, Passports and visas, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Unemployment, Wages,
Working conditions.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated
herein, the Department hereby amends
20 CFR part 655 as follows:
PART 655—TEMPORARY
EMPLOYMENT OF FOREIGN
WORKERS IN THE UNITED STATES
1. The authority citation for part 655
and the authority citation for subparts D
and E continue to read as follows:
■
Authority: Section 655.0 issued under 8
U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(E)(iii), 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)
and (ii), 8 U.S.C. 1103(a)(6), 1182(m), (n) and
(t), 1184(c), (g), and (j), 1188, and 1288(c) and
(d); sec. 3(c)(1), Pub. L. 101–238, 103 Stat.
2099, 2102 (8 U.S.C. 1182 note); sec. 221(a),
Pub. L. 101–649, 104 Stat. 4978, 5027 (8
U.S.C. 1184 note); sec. 303(a)(8), Pub. L. 102–
232, 105 Stat. 1733, 1748 (8 U.S.C. 1101
note); sec. 323(c), Pub. L. 103–206, 107 Stat.
2428; sec. 412(e), Pub. L. 105–277, 112 Stat.
2681 (8 U.S.C. 1182 note); sec. 2(d), Pub. L.
106–95, 113 Stat. 1312, 1316 (8 U.S.C. 1182
note); 29 U.S.C. 49k; Pub. L. 109–423, 120
Stat. 2900; 8 CFR 214.2(h)(4)(i); and 8 CFR
214.2(h)(6)(iii).
*
*
*
*
*
Subparts D and E issued under 8 U.S.C.
1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(a), 1182(m), and 1184; 29
U.S.C. 49 et seq.; and sec. 3(c)(1), Pub. L.
101–238, 103 Stat. 2099, 2103 (8 U.S.C. 1182
note).
Subpart D—[Removed and Reserved]
2. Remove and reserve subpart D,
consisting of §§ 655.300 through
655.350.
■
Subpart E—[Removed and Reserved]
3. Remove and reserve subpart E,
consisting of §§ 655.400 through
655.460.
The Department drafted this rule in
plain language.
K. Executive Order 13211
This rule is not subject to E.O. 13211.
It will not have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy.
13:56 Nov 19, 2013
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
This rule contains no new
information collection requirements for
purposes of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
■
J. Plain Language
VerDate Mar<15>2010
L. Paperwork Reduction Act
Jkt 232001
69541
Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of
October 2013.
Eric M. Seleznow,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Employment and
Training Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013–27683 Filed 11–19–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–FP–P
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
20 CFR Part 655
Labor Certification Process for
Logging Employment and Non-H–2A
Agricultural Employment
Employment and Training
Administration, Department of Labor.
ACTION: Final rule; rescission of
regulations.
AGENCY:
This final rule rescinds the
regulations for employers in the logging
industry utilizing foreign workers. The
regulations became obsolete after a
rulemaking in 2010 reassigned them
elsewhere in the Code of Federal
Regulations. The Department of Labor
(‘‘Department’’) is issuing this final rule
to remove the obsolete regulations.
DATES: Effective November 20, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William L. Carlson, Ph.D.,
Administrator, Office of Foreign Labor
Certification, Room C–4312,
Employment & Training Administration,
U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20210. Telephone number: 202–
693–3010 (this is not a toll-free
number). Individuals with hearing or
speech impairments may access the
telephone number above via TTY by
calling the toll-free Federal Information
Relay Service at 1–877–889–5627 (TTY/
TDD). Fax: 202–693–2768.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Subpart C,
Labor Certification for Logging
Employment and Non-H–2A Agriculture
Employment, was made obsolete by the
inclusion of ‘‘logging employment’’
within the definition of ‘‘agricultural
labor or services’’ in the Department of
Labor’s final rule, Temporary
Agricultural Employment of H–2A
Aliens in the United States, 75 FR 6884
(Feb. 12, 2010). The effect of including
‘‘logging employment’’ within the
definition of ‘‘agricultural labor or
services,’’ 20 CFR 655.103(c)(4), was to
include within the program
requirements for temporary employment
of foreign workers in agriculture (H–2A)
employers seeking to temporarily
employ foreign workers in logging
occupations. The Department proposed
the inclusion of logging employment in
the H–2A program in its notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM). 74 FR
45906 (Sept. 4, 2009). After considering
comments from the public on the
subject, the inclusion of logging in the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20NOR1.SGM
20NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 224 (Wednesday, November 20, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 69539-69541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27683]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
20 CFR Part 655
RIN 1205-AB67
Removal of Attestation Process for Facilities Using H-1A
Registered Nurses
AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Department of Labor, in
concurrence with the Wage and Hour Division, Department of Labor.
[[Page 69540]]
ACTION: Final rule; rescission of regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule rescinds the regulations found which provided
rules governing health care facilities using nonimmigrant foreign
workers as registered nurses under the H-1A visa program. These
subparts became obsolete after the authorizing statute and all
extensions expired. Accordingly, the Department of Labor (the
Department) is taking this action to remove regulations that no longer
have force and effect.
DATES: Effective November 20, 2013.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William L. Carlson, Ph.D.,
Administrator, Office of Foreign Labor Certification, Room C-4312,
Employment & Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210. Telephone number: 202-
693-3010 (this is not a toll-free number). Individuals with hearing or
speech impairments may access the telephone number above via TTY by
calling the toll-free Federal Information Relay Service at 1-877-889-
5627 (TTY/TDD). Fax: 202-693-2768. This notice is available through the
printed Federal Register, and electronically at https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collection.action?collectionCode=FR.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 1989, Congress created an H-1A
nonimmigrant classification exclusively for the temporary admission and
employment of registered nurses, which permitted employers during a
five-year pilot program to hire foreign nurses after filing a detailed
attestation showing the steps they were taking to lower their reliance
on foreign nurses. Immigration Nursing Relief Act of 1989 (INRA),
Public Law 101-238, 103 Stat. 2099 (December 18, 1989), amending
Sections 101(a)(15)(H)(i) and 212 of the Immigration and Nationality
Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(a) and 1182(m).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The provisions which INRA added to the INA were further
amended by section 162(f) of the Immigration Act of 1990 (IMMACT),
Public Law 101-649, 104 Stat. 4978 (November 29, 1990), and by
section 302(e)(9) and (10) of the Miscellaneous and Technical
Immigration and Naturalization Amendments of 1991 (MTINA), Public
Law 102-232, 105 Stat. 1733 (December 12, 1991).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The H-1A nonimmigrant classification originally expired on
September 1, 1995. However, on October 11, 1996, Congress enacted
Public Law 104-302, 110 Stat. 3656, which extended the authorized
period of stay within the United States for certain nurses in certain
geographic locations in the United States experiencing a shortage of
registered nurses. That legislation provided for extending the stay
until September 30, 1997, of certain foreign workers who: (1) Entered
the United States as H-1A nurses; (2) were within the United States on
or after September 1, 1995, and who were within the United States on
October 11, 1996; and (3) whose period of authorized stay had expired
or would expire before September 30, 1997 but for the enactment of the
legislation. Public Law 104-302 did not provide for the approval of new
H-1A petitions and related solely to extensions of stay for foreign
workers who were in, or had previously been given, nonimmigrant H-1A
status as registered nurses. In addition, the legislation did not
affect those in H-1A status whose period of authorized stay expired
after September 30, 1997, and those H-1A nurses were allowed to remain
in the United States until the validity of their petition expired,
which could have been as late as August 31, 2000. Congress did not
further extend the stays of any H-1A nurses, and following the
expiration of all H-1A periods of stay, no foreign nurses on H-1A visas
were employed after August 31, 2000. Furthermore, Congress has never
renewed the original H-1A program, and ultimately repealed it in 1999
in Sec. 2(c) of the Nursing Relief for Disadvantaged Areas Act of 1999,
Public Law 106-095, 113 Stat. 1312, 1316.
The Department implemented the H-1A program through regulations at
20 CFR part 655 Subparts D and E. See 55 FR 50500 (Dec. 6, 1990), as
amended by 59 FR 874 (Jan. 6, 1994). Because of the expiration of the
authorizing legislation, these regulations are without force and
effect, and must be rescinded.
The Department has determined that it is unnecessary to publish the
rescission of these regulations as a proposed rule, as generally
required by the Administrative Procedure Act (``APA''), 5 U.S.C.
553(b). Notice to the public and provision of a public comment period
for this rule is unnecessary because the enabling statute has expired,
and, consequently, the regulations are now without force or effect. 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B). Therefore, good cause exists for dispensing with the
notice and comment requirements of the APA. 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). For the
same reasons, good cause exists to make this rule effective immediately
upon publication of this rule. 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3).
Administrative Information
A. Executive Order 12866
This final rule has been drafted and reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866, section 1(b), Principles of Regulation. The
Department has determined that this rule is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, section 3(f),
Regulatory Planning and Review. The Department has also determined that
this rule is not ``economically significant'' as defined in section
3(f)(1) of Executive Order 12866. Therefore, the information enumerated
in section 6(a)(3)(C) of the order is not required.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rescission is not a ``rule'' as defined in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601(2), nor is it a ``final rule''
following a notice of proposed rulemaking as defined in the RFA, 5
U.S.C. 604(a). Therefore, the RFA does not apply and the Department is
not required to either certify that the rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
or conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis.
C. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not include any Federal mandate that may result in
increased expenditures by State, local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, of $100 million or more, or in increased expenditures by the
private sector of $100 million or more.
D. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as defined by section 804 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. This rule
will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or
more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or on the ability of the United States-based companies to
compete with foreign based companies in domestic and export markets.
E. Executive Order 13132
The Department has reviewed this rule in accordance with E.O. 13132
regarding federalism and has determined that it does not have
federalism implications. The rule does not have substantial direct
effects on States, on the relationship between the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
[[Page 69541]]
levels of Government as described by E.O. 13132. Therefore, the
Department has determined that this rule will not have a sufficient
federalism implication to warrant the preparation of a summary impact
statement.
F. Executive Order 13175
This rule was reviewed under the terms of E.O. 13175 and determined
not to have Tribal implications. The rule does not have substantial
direct effects on one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes. As a result, no Tribal summary impact
statement has been prepared.
G. Assessment of Federal Regulations and Policies on Families
Section 654 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act, enacted as part of the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency
Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1999 (Pub. L. 105-277, 112 Stat.
2681) requires the Department to assess the impact of this rule on
family well-being. A rule that is determined to have a negative effect
on families must be supported with an adequate rationale. The
Department has assessed this rule and determines that it will not have
a negative effect on families.
H. Executive Order 12630
This rule is not subject to E.O. 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights, because
it does not involve implementation of a policy with takings
implications.
I. Executive Order 12988
This regulation has been drafted and reviewed in accordance with
E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform, and will not unduly burden the
Federal court system. The regulation has been written to minimize
litigation and provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct, and
has been reviewed carefully to eliminate drafting errors and
ambiguities.
J. Plain Language
The Department drafted this rule in plain language.
K. Executive Order 13211
This rule is not subject to E.O. 13211. It will not have a
significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy.
L. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule contains no new information collection requirements for
purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.).
List of Subjects in 20 CFR Part 655
Administrative practice and procedure, Foreign workers, Employment,
Employment and training, Enforcement, Forest and forest products,
Fraud, Health professions, Immigration, Labor, Longshore and harbor
work, Migrant workers, Nonimmigrant workers, Passports and visas,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Unemployment,
Wages, Working conditions.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated herein, the Department hereby
amends 20 CFR part 655 as follows:
PART 655--TEMPORARY EMPLOYMENT OF FOREIGN WORKERS IN THE UNITED
STATES
0
1. The authority citation for part 655 and the authority citation for
subparts D and E continue to read as follows:
Authority: Section 655.0 issued under 8 U.S.C.
1101(a)(15)(E)(iii), 1101(a)(15)(H)(i) and (ii), 8 U.S.C.
1103(a)(6), 1182(m), (n) and (t), 1184(c), (g), and (j), 1188, and
1288(c) and (d); sec. 3(c)(1), Pub. L. 101-238, 103 Stat. 2099, 2102
(8 U.S.C. 1182 note); sec. 221(a), Pub. L. 101-649, 104 Stat. 4978,
5027 (8 U.S.C. 1184 note); sec. 303(a)(8), Pub. L. 102-232, 105
Stat. 1733, 1748 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note); sec. 323(c), Pub. L. 103-206,
107 Stat. 2428; sec. 412(e), Pub. L. 105-277, 112 Stat. 2681 (8
U.S.C. 1182 note); sec. 2(d), Pub. L. 106-95, 113 Stat. 1312, 1316
(8 U.S.C. 1182 note); 29 U.S.C. 49k; Pub. L. 109-423, 120 Stat.
2900; 8 CFR 214.2(h)(4)(i); and 8 CFR 214.2(h)(6)(iii).
* * * * *
Subparts D and E issued under 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(a),
1182(m), and 1184; 29 U.S.C. 49 et seq.; and sec. 3(c)(1), Pub. L.
101-238, 103 Stat. 2099, 2103 (8 U.S.C. 1182 note).
Subpart D--[Removed and Reserved]
0
2. Remove and reserve subpart D, consisting of Sec. Sec. 655.300
through 655.350.
Subpart E--[Removed and Reserved]
0
3. Remove and reserve subpart E, consisting of Sec. Sec. 655.400
through 655.460.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 18th day of October 2013.
Eric M. Seleznow,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Employment and Training Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-27683 Filed 11-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FP-P