Certain Electronic Imaging Devices; Notice of Request for Statements on the Public Interest, 69440-69441 [2013-27666]
Download as PDF
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
69440
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 19, 2013 / Notices
Secretary, and should be received not
later than 5:15 p.m., January 21, 2014.
All written submissions must conform
to the provisions of section 201.8 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 201.8). Section 201.8
and the Commission’s Handbook on
Filing Procedures require that interested
parties file documents electronically on
or before the filing deadline and submit
eight (8) true paper copies by 12:00
noon eastern time on the next business
day. In the event that confidential
treatment of a document is requested,
interested parties must file, at the same
time as the eight paper copies, at least
four (4) additional true paper copies in
which the confidential information
must be deleted (see the following
paragraph for further information
regarding confidential business
information). Persons with questions
regarding electronic filing should
contact the Secretary (202–205–2000).
Any submissions that contain
confidential business information (CBI)
must also conform with the
requirements of section 201.6 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 201.6). Section 201.6
of the rules requires that the cover of the
document and the individual pages be
clearly marked as to whether they are
the ‘‘confidential’’ or ‘‘non-confidential’’
version, and that the confidential
business information be clearly
identified by means of brackets. All
written submissions, except for
confidential business information, will
be made available for inspection by
interested parties. In his request letter
the USTR said that it is the intent of his
office to make the Commission’s report
in the first investigation, No. 332–542
AGOA: Trade and Investment
Performance Overview, available to the
public in its entirety, and asked that the
Commission not include any
confidential business information or
national security classified information
in the report that it sends to the USTR.
Any confidential business information
received by the Commission in this
investigation and used in preparing this
report will not be published in a manner
that would reveal the operations of the
firm supplying the information. The
Commission may include some or all of
the confidential business information
submitted in the course of investigation
Nos. 332–544, 332–545, and 332–546 in
the reports it sends to the USTR in those
investigations. The Commission will not
otherwise publish any confidential
business information in a manner that
would reveal the operations of the firm
supplying the information.
By order of the Commission.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 Nov 18, 2013
Jkt 232001
Issued: November 13, 2013.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013–27575 Filed 11–18–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–850]
Certain Electronic Imaging Devices;
Notice of Request for Statements on
the Public Interest
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the presiding administrative law judge
has issued a Final Initial Determination
and Recommended Determination on
Remedy and Bonding in the abovecaptioned investigation. The
Commission is soliciting comments on
public interest issues raised by the
recommended relief, specifically the
limited exclusion order (‘‘LEO’’)
recommended by the ALJ. This notice is
soliciting public interest comments from
the public only. Parties are to file public
interest submissions pursuant to 19 CFR
210.50(a)(4).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jia
Chen, Office of the General Counsel,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
500 E Street SW., Washington, DC
20436, telephone (202) 708–4737. The
public version of the complaint can be
accessed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov, and will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that
information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 provides
that if the Commission finds a violation
it shall exclude the articles concerned
from the United States:
SUMMARY:
unless, after considering the effect of such
exclusion upon the public health and
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
welfare, competitive conditions in the United
States economy, the production of like or
directly competitive articles in the United
States, and United States consumers, it finds
that such articles should not be excluded
from entry.
19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1). A similar
provision applies to cease and desist
orders. 19 U.S.C. 1337(f)(1).
The Commission is interested in
further development of the record on
the public interest in these
investigations. Accordingly, members of
the public are invited to file
submissions of no more than five (5)
pages, inclusive of attachments,
concerning the public interest in light of
the administrative law judge’s
Recommended Determination on
Remedy and Bonding issued in this
investigation on September 30, 2013.
Comments should address whether
issuance of a LEO in this investigation
would affect the public health and
welfare in the United States,
competitive conditions in the United
States economy, the production of like
or directly competitive articles in the
United States, or United States
consumers.
In particular, the Commission is
interested in comments that:
(i) Explain how the articles
potentially subject to the recommended
orders are used in the United States;
(ii) identify any public health, safety,
or welfare concerns in the United States
relating to the recommended orders;
(iii) identify like or directly
competitive articles that complainant,
its licensees, or third parties make in the
United States which could replace the
subject articles if they were to be
excluded;
(iv) indicate whether complainant,
complainant’s licensees, and/or third
party suppliers have the capacity to
replace the volume of articles
potentially subject to the recommended
exclusion order and/or a cease and
desist order within a commercially
reasonable time; and
(v) explain how the LEO would
impact consumers in the United States.
Written submissions must be filed no
later than by close of business on
November 21, 2013.
Persons filing written submissions
must file the original document
electronically on or before the deadlines
stated above and submit 8 true paper
copies to the Office of the Secretary by
noon the next day pursuant to section
210.4(f) of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to
the investigation number (‘‘Inv. No.
337–TA–850’’) in a prominent place on
the cover page and/or the first page.
E:\FR\FM\19NON1.SGM
19NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 19, 2013 / Notices
(See Handbook for Electronic Filing
Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/
secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/
handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf).
Persons with questions regarding filing
should contact the Secretary (202–205–
2000).
Any person desiring to submit a
document to the Commission in
confidence must request confidential
treatment. All such requests should be
directed to the Secretary to the
Commission and must include a full
statement of the reasons why the
Commission should grant such
treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents
for which confidential treatment by the
Commission is properly sought will be
treated accordingly. A redacted nonconfidential version of the document
must also be filed simultaneously with
the any confidential filing. All nonconfidential written submissions will be
available for public inspection at the
Office of the Secretary and on EDIS.
This action is taken under the
authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337),
and of sections 201.10 and 210.50 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 210.50).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 14, 2013.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013–27666 Filed 11–18–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Notice of Lodging of Proposed
Consent Decree Under the Clean Water
Act
On November 13, 2013, the
Department of Justice lodged a proposed
Consent Decree with the United States
District Court for the Western District of
Louisiana in the lawsuit entitled The
United States and The State of
Louisiana v. The City of Shreveport,
Louisiana, Case No: 5:13–cv–03065. The
Consent Decree resolves the claims of
Plaintiffs in the complaint against The
City of Shreveport, for Shreveport’s
sanitary sewer overflows in violation of
Sections 301 and 309 of the Clean Water
Act, 42 U.S.C. 1311 and 1319, and the
terms and conditions of Louisiana
Pollutant Discharge Elimination permits
issued to the City under Section 402 of
the Clean Water Act, 42 U.S.C. 1342.
Under the proposed Consent Decree,
Shreveport has agreed to pay a civil
penalty of $650,000 and perform
remediation of its wastewater collection
treatment system, including the Lucas
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:21 Nov 18, 2013
Jkt 232001
and North Regional treatment plants,
estimated to cost approximately $141
million.
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment on the
Consent Decree. Comments should be
addressed to the Assistant Attorney
General, Environment and Natural
Resources Division, and should refer to
The United States and the State of
Louisiana v. The City of Shreveport,
Louisiana, DJ#: 90–5–1–1–2767/1. All
comments must be submitted no later
than thirty (30) days after the
publication date of this notice.
Comments may be submitted either by
email or by mail:
To submit
comments:
Send them to:
By email .........
By mail ...........
pubcomment-ees.enrd@
usdoj.gov.
Assistant Attorney General,
U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O.
Box 7611, Washington,
D.C. 20044–7611.
During the public comment period,
the Consent Decree may be examined
and downloaded at this Justice
Department Web site: https://
www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_
Decrees.html. We will provide a paper
copy of the Consent Decree upon
written request and payment of
reproduction costs. Please mail your
request and payment to: Consent Decree
Library, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box
7611, Washington, DC 20044–7611.
Please enclose a check or money order
for $36.50 (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the United
States Treasury.
Thomas P. Carroll,
Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement
Section, Environment and Natural Resources
Division.
[FR Doc. 2013–27674 Filed 11–18–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
Wheatland Pharmacy; Decision and
Order
On July 17, 2012, the Deputy
Assistant Administrator, Office of
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration, issued an Order to
Show Cause to Wheatland Pharmacy
(Applicant), of Dallas, Texas. The Show
Cause Order proposed the denial of
Applicant’s pending application for a
DEA Certificate of Registration as a
retail pharmacy on the ground that its
registration ‘‘would be inconsistent with
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
69441
the public interest,’’ as defined in 21
U.S.C. 823(f). GX 7, at 1.
The Show Cause Order alleged that on
September 29, 2010, the Administrator
issued an Order to Show Cause and
Immediate Suspension of Registration to
Applicant, and that, on January 18,
2011, Applicant voluntarily surrendered
its previous registration. Id. at 1–2.
Specifically, the Show Cause Order
alleged that Lynn Michelle Clark,
Applicant’s owner/pharmacist,
‘‘unlawfully filled numerous fraudulent
controlled substance prescriptions for
individuals known to divert these
drugs,’’ and that she ‘‘knew or should
have known that these prescriptions
were fraudulent.’’ Id. at 1. The Show
Cause Order further alleged that ‘‘Ms.
Clark failed to fulfill her responsibility
to dispense controlled substances only
pursuant to a prescription issued for a
legitimate medical purpose in the usual
course of professional practice’’ and that
she ‘‘also violated federal law by
delivering prescriptions for controlled
substances to persons who were not the
ultimate users of the controlled
substances.’’ Id. at 1–2 (citing 21 U.S.C.
829, 841(a)(1), 842(a) and 802(10) &
(27)). Finally, the Order alleged that on
July 7, 2011, Ms. Clark submitted an
application for a new registration on
Applicant’s behalf.1 Id. at 1.
Thereafter, Applicant apparently
requested a hearing on the allegations
and the matter was placed on the docket
of the Office of Administrative Law
Judges. However, on October 4, 2012,
Applicant moved for a stay of the
proceeding pending action on its
request to withdraw its application, and
on October 5, 2012, the ALJ granted the
motion. GX 14, at 1.
On November 7, 2012, the Deputy
Assistant Administrator, Office of
Diversion Control, denied Applicant’s
request to withdraw. GX 13, at 1.
Thereafter, on November 26, 2012,
Applicant filed with the ALJ a letter
waiving its right to a hearing, citing 21
CFR 1301.43(e). GX 13, at 3. The next
day, the ALJ found that Applicant had
waived its right to a hearing; the ALJ
thus lifted the stay of the proceeding
and ordered that the proceeding be
terminated. GX 14.
On June 12, 2013, the Government
filed a Request for Final Agency Action
and the Investigative Record with this
Office. Req. for Final Agency Action, at
14. Therein, the Government requests
that I deny Applicant’s pending
1 The Show Cause Order also notified Applicant
of its right to request a hearing on the allegations
or to submit a written statement in lieu of a hearing,
the procedure for electing either option, and the
consequences for failing to do so. See 21 CFR
1301.43.
E:\FR\FM\19NON1.SGM
19NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 223 (Tuesday, November 19, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69440-69441]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27666]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-850]
Certain Electronic Imaging Devices; Notice of Request for
Statements on the Public Interest
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the presiding administrative law
judge has issued a Final Initial Determination and Recommended
Determination on Remedy and Bonding in the above-captioned
investigation. The Commission is soliciting comments on public interest
issues raised by the recommended relief, specifically the limited
exclusion order (``LEO'') recommended by the ALJ. This notice is
soliciting public interest comments from the public only. Parties are
to file public interest submissions pursuant to 19 CFR 210.50(a)(4).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jia Chen, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-4737. The public version of
the complaint can be accessed on the Commission's electronic docket
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov, and will be available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office
of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000.
General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public
record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930
provides that if the Commission finds a violation it shall exclude the
articles concerned from the United States:
unless, after considering the effect of such exclusion upon the
public health and welfare, competitive conditions in the United
States economy, the production of like or directly competitive
articles in the United States, and United States consumers, it finds
that such articles should not be excluded from entry.
19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1). A similar provision applies to cease and desist
orders. 19 U.S.C. 1337(f)(1).
The Commission is interested in further development of the record
on the public interest in these investigations. Accordingly, members of
the public are invited to file submissions of no more than five (5)
pages, inclusive of attachments, concerning the public interest in
light of the administrative law judge's Recommended Determination on
Remedy and Bonding issued in this investigation on September 30, 2013.
Comments should address whether issuance of a LEO in this investigation
would affect the public health and welfare in the United States,
competitive conditions in the United States economy, the production of
like or directly competitive articles in the United States, or United
States consumers.
In particular, the Commission is interested in comments that:
(i) Explain how the articles potentially subject to the recommended
orders are used in the United States;
(ii) identify any public health, safety, or welfare concerns in the
United States relating to the recommended orders;
(iii) identify like or directly competitive articles that
complainant, its licensees, or third parties make in the United States
which could replace the subject articles if they were to be excluded;
(iv) indicate whether complainant, complainant's licensees, and/or
third party suppliers have the capacity to replace the volume of
articles potentially subject to the recommended exclusion order and/or
a cease and desist order within a commercially reasonable time; and
(v) explain how the LEO would impact consumers in the United
States. Written submissions must be filed no later than by close of
business on November 21, 2013.
Persons filing written submissions must file the original document
electronically on or before the deadlines stated above and submit 8
true paper copies to the Office of the Secretary by noon the next day
pursuant to section 210.4(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure (19 CFR 210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to the
investigation number (``Inv. No. 337-TA-850'') in a prominent place on
the cover page and/or the first page.
[[Page 69441]]
(See Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf). Persons with questions regarding filing should contact the
Secretary (202-205-2000).
Any person desiring to submit a document to the Commission in
confidence must request confidential treatment. All such requests
should be directed to the Secretary to the Commission and must include
a full statement of the reasons why the Commission should grant such
treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents for which confidential treatment
by the Commission is properly sought will be treated accordingly. A
redacted non-confidential version of the document must also be filed
simultaneously with the any confidential filing. All non-confidential
written submissions will be available for public inspection at the
Office of the Secretary and on EDIS.
This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and of sections 201.10
and 210.50 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
201.10, 210.50).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 14, 2013.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013-27666 Filed 11-18-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P