Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend EDGX Rule 3.5 (Advertising Practices) and To Repeal Rule 3.20 (Initial or Partial Payments) To Conform with the Rules of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., 68897-68901 [2013-27320]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 221 / Friday, November 15, 2013 / Notices
robust market forces and therefore must
remain competitive with fees charged
and rebates paid by other venues and
therefore must continue to be reasonable
and equitably allocated to those
members that opt to direct orders to the
Exchange rather than competing venues.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.11 At any time
within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall
institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule should be
approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–Phlx–2013–110 on the
subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–Phlx–2013–110. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–Phlx–
2013–110 and should be submitted on
or before December 6, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.12
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–27323 Filed 11–14–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–70836; File No. SR–EDGX–
2013–40]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGX
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend EDGX Rule 3.5
(Advertising Practices) and To Repeal
Rule 3.20 (Initial or Partial Payments)
To Conform with the Rules of the
Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.
November 8, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Exchange Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that
on October 28, 2013, EDGX Exchange,
Inc. (‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which items have
been substantially prepared by the
Exchange. The Exchange has designated
the proposed rule change as constituting
a ‘‘non-controversial’’ rule change under
Exchange Act Rule 19b–4(f)(6), which
renders the proposal effective upon
receipt of this filing by the
Commission.3 The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
EDGX Rule 3.5 (Advertising Practices)
and repeal EDGX Rule 3.20 (Initial or
Partial Payments) to conform with the
rules of the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority, Inc. (‘‘FINRA’’)
for purposes of an agreement between
the Exchange and FINRA pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 17d–2.4 The text of
the proposed rule change is available on
the Exchange’s Web site at https://
www.directedge.com, at the Exchange’s
principal office, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for,
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 17d–
2,5 the Exchange and FINRA entered
into an agreement to allocate regulatory
responsibility for common rules (‘‘17d–
2 Agreement’’). The 17d–2 Agreement
covers common members of the
Exchange and FINRA (‘‘Common
Members’’) and allocates to FINRA
regulatory responsibility, with respect to
Common Members, for the following: (i)
Examination of Common Members for
compliance with federal securities laws,
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:58 Nov 14, 2013
Jkt 232001
12 17
3 17
1 15
11 15
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
4 17
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
68897
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
CFR 240.17d–2.
5 Id.
E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM
15NON1
68898
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 221 / Friday, November 15, 2013 / Notices
rules and regulations and rules of the
Exchange that the Exchange has
certified as identical or substantially
similar to FINRA rules; (ii) investigation
of Common Members for violations of
federal securities laws, rules and
regulations, and the rules of the
Exchange that the Exchange has
certified as identical or substantially
identical to FINRA rules; and (iii)
enforcement of compliance by Common
Members with the federal securities
laws, rules and regulations, and the
rules of the Exchange that the Exchange
has certified as identical or substantially
similar to FINRA rules.
The 17d–2 Agreement included a
certification by the Exchange that states
that the requirements contained in
certain Exchange rules are identical to,
or substantially similar to, certain
FINRA rules that have been identified as
comparable. To conform with
comparable FINRA rules for purposes of
the 17d–2 Agreement, the Exchange
proposes to: (i) amend EDGX Rule 3.5
(Advertising Practices) and (ii) repeal
EDGX Rule 3.20 (Initial or Partial
Payments).
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
EDGX Rule 3.5 (Advertising Practices)
The Exchange proposes to delete the
current text of Rule 3.5 and adopt text
that would require Exchange members
to comply with FINRA Rule 2210 as if
such Rule were part of the Exchange’s
rules and to rename the rule
‘‘Communications with the Public.’’ 6
The proposed rule text is substantially
the same as Rule 2210(a) of the Nasdaq
Stock Market LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’), which
was approved by the Commission.7
Currently, Exchange Rule 3.5(d) and
(f) are excluded from the 17d–2
Agreement because they are not are
identical to, or substantially similar to,
certain FINRA rules. First, Exchange
Rule 3.5(d) requires that advertising and
sales literature be pre-approved and
signed or initialed by a supervisor while
FINRA Rule 2210(b) only requires
supervisory pre-approval for retail
communication, and imposes different
supervisory review standards for
institutional communication, and
correspondence. Second, Rule 3.5(f) and
FINRA Rule 2210(d)(6) contain different
content requirements for testimonials.
6 The Exchange does not propose to require that
its members comply with subparagraph (c) of
FINRA Rule 2210. FINRA Rule 2210(c) generally
requires that FINRA members file certain
communications with FINRA. The Exchange
believes that it is inappropriate for its rules to
require its members to file certain communications
with FINRA as such filing requirements under
FINRA rules are between FINRA and its members.
7 See Exchange Act Release No. 58069 (Jun. 30,
2008), 73 FR 39360 (Jul. 9, 2008) (Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:58 Nov 14, 2013
Jkt 232001
Exchange Rule 3.5(d) and (f) were,
therefore, excluded from the 17d–2
Agreement because their requirements
were not identical or substantially
similar to those required under FINRA
Rule 2210(b) and (d)(6) respectively. To
harmonize its rules with FINRA, the
Exchange proposes to delete the current
text of Rule 3.5 and adopt text that
would require its members to comply
with FINRA Rule 2210 as if it was part
of the Exchange’s rules so that Rule 3.5
can be incorporated into the 17d–2
Agreement in its entirety.
The Exchange believes that these
changes would help to avoid confusion
among its members that are also FINRA
members by further aligning the
Exchange Rule 3.5 with FINRA Rule
2210. The proposed changes to Rule 3.5
are designed to enable the Exchange to
incorporate Rule 3.5 into the 17d–2
Agreement, further reducing duplicative
regulation of Exchange members that are
also FINRA members.
Summary of FINRA Rule 2210
FINRA Rule 2210 generally sets forth
the content, filing, supervisory review,
and record retention for FINRA
members’ communications with the
public. A summary of FINRA Rule 2210
is below. A complete description of
FINRA Rule 2210 is provided in
FINRA’s Regulatory Notice 12–29.8
FINRA Rule 2210 divides a member’s
communications with the public into
the following three categories:
• Institutional communication.
FINRA Rule 2210(a)(3) defines
‘‘institutional communication’’ as ‘‘any
written (including electronic)
communication that is distributed or
made available only to institutional
investors, but does not include a
member’s internal communications.’’
• Retail communication. FINRA Rule
2210(a)(5) defines ‘‘retail
communication’’ as ‘‘any written
(including electronic) communication
that is distributed or made available to
more than 25 retail investors within any
30-day calendar period.’’ ‘‘Retail
investor’’ includes any person other
than an institutional investor, regardless
of whether the person has an account
with the firm. Communications that are
considered advertisements and sales
literature fall under the definition of
‘‘retail communication.’’
• Correspondence. FINRA Rule
2210(a)(2) defines ‘‘correspondence’’ as
‘‘any written (including electronic)
communication that is distributed or
made available to fewer than 25 retail
8 See FINRA Regulatory Notice 12–29 (June 2012)
available at https://finra.complinet.com/net_file_
store/new_rulebooks/f/i/FINRANotice12_29.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
investors within any 30-day calendar
period.’’
Supervisory Review. To comply with
FINRA Rules 2210(b)’s supervisory
requirements, Common Members must
obtain supervisory pre-approval of all
retail communications, while
institutional communications and
correspondence would be subject to
supervisory review, but not preapproval.
Under FINRA Rule 2210(b)(1), all
retail communications must be
approved by a supervisor prior to their
first use or filing with FINRA under
FINRA Rule 2210(c). FINRA’s Rule
2210(b)(1)’s supervisory requirements
do not apply to a retail communication
if, at the time that a member intends to
publish or distribute it: (i) Another
member has filed it with FINRA and has
received a letter from FINRA stating that
it appears to be consistent with
applicable standards; and (ii) the
member has not materially altered it and
will not use it in a manner that is
inconsistent with the conditions of
FINRA’s letter. The rule’s supervisory
review requirements also do not apply
to the following retail communications,
provided that the member supervises
and reviews such communications in
the same manner as required for
supervising and reviewing
correspondence pursuant to NASD Rule
3010(d): (i) Any retail communication
that is excepted from the definition of
‘‘research report’’ pursuant to NASD
Rule 2711(a)(9)(A), unless the
communication makes any financial or
investment recommendation; (ii) any
retail communication that is posted on
an online interactive electronic forum;
and (iii) any retail communication that
does not make any financial or
investment recommendation or
otherwise promote a product or service
of the member.
For institutional communications,
FINRA Rule 2210(b)(3) requires a
member to establish written procedures
that are appropriate to its business, size,
structure, and customers for the review
by an appropriately qualified registered
principal of institutional
communications used by the member
and its associated persons. Such
procedures must be reasonably designed
to ensure that institutional
communications comply with
applicable standards. When such
procedures do not require review of all
institutional communications prior to
their first use or distribution, they must
include provisions for: (i) The education
and training of associated persons as to
the firm’s procedures governing
institutional communications; (ii) the
documentation of such education and
E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM
15NON1
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 221 / Friday, November 15, 2013 / Notices
training; and (iii) surveillance and
follow-up to ensure that such
procedures are implemented and
adhered to. A member must maintain
and make available to FINRA upon
request evidence that these supervisory
procedures have been implemented and
carried out.
FINRA Rule 2210(b)(2) states that
correspondence is subject to the
supervision and review requirements of
NASD Rule 3010(d). Under NASD Rule
3010(d)(2), each member shall develop
written procedures that are appropriate
to its business, size, structure, and
customers for the review of incoming
and outgoing written (i.e., nonelectronic) and electronic
correspondence with the public relating
to its investment banking or securities
business. These written procedures
should include procedures: (i) To
review incoming, written
correspondence directed to registered
representatives and related to the
member’s investment banking or
securities business; (ii) to properly
identify and handle customer
complaints; and (iii) to ensure that
customer funds and securities are
handled in accordance with firm
procedures. When such procedures do
not require review of all correspondence
prior to their first use or distribution,
they must include provisions for: (i) The
education and training of associated
persons as to the firm’s procedures
governing correspondence; (ii) the
documentation of such education and
training; and (iii) surveillance and
follow-up to ensure that such
procedures are implemented and
adhered to.
Record Retention. Under FINRA Rule
2210(b)(4)(A), members must maintain
all retail communications and
institutional communications for the
retention period required by Exchange
Act Rule 17a–4(b) and in a format and
media that comply with Exchange Act
Rule 17a–4. The records must include:
• A copy of the communication and
the dates of first and (if applicable) last
use of such communication;
• the name of any registered principal
who approved the communication and
the date that approval was given;
• in the case of a retail
communication or an institutional
communication that is not approved
prior to first use by a registered
principal, the name of the person who
prepared or distributed the
communication;
• information concerning the source
of any statistical table, chart, graph or
other illustration used in the
communication; and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:58 Nov 14, 2013
Jkt 232001
• for any retail communication for
which principal approval is not
required pursuant to FINRA Rule
2210(b)(1)(C), the name of the member
that filed the retail communication with
the Department, and a copy of the
corresponding review letter from the
Department.
Filing Requirements. Like Nasdaq
Rule 2210(a), Exchange Rule 3.5 would
expressly state that Exchange members
would not be required to comply with
FINRA Rule 2210(c). FINRA Rule
2210(c) generally requires FINRA
members to file certain retail
communications with FINRA prior to
their first use. Exchange members who
are also FINRA members would
continue to be subject to FINRA Rule
2210(c).
Content Standards. FINRA Rule
2210(d) sets forth general content
standards for all communications. More
specifically, all member
communications must be based on
principles of fair dealing and good faith,
must be fair and balanced, and must
provide a sound basis for evaluating the
facts in regard to any particular security
or type of security, industry, or service.
No member may omit any material fact
or qualification if the omission, in light
of the context of the material presented,
would cause the communication to be
misleading. No member may make any
false, exaggerated, unwarranted,
promissory or misleading statement or
claim in any communication. No
member may publish, circulate or
distribute any communication that the
member knows or has reason to know
contains any untrue statement of a
material fact or is otherwise false or
misleading. Information may be placed
in a legend or footnote only in the event
that such placement would not inhibit
an investor’s understanding of the
communication. Members must ensure
that statements are clear and not
misleading within the context in which
they are made, and that they provide
balanced treatment of risks and
potential benefits. Communications
must be consistent with the risks of
fluctuating prices and the uncertainty of
dividends, rates of return and yield
inherent to investments. Members must
consider the nature of the audience to
which the communication will be
directed and must provide details and
explanations appropriate to the
audience.
Communications may also not predict
or project performance, imply that past
performance will recur or make any
exaggerated or unwarranted claim,
opinion or forecast; provided, however,
communications may include: (i) A
hypothetical illustration of
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
68899
mathematical principles, provided that
it does not predict or project the
performance of an investment or
investment strategy; (ii) an investment
analysis tool, or a written report
produced by an investment analysis
tool, that meets the requirements of
FINRA Rule 2214; and (iii) a price target
contained in a research report on debt
or equity securities, provided that the
price target has a reasonable basis, the
report discloses the valuation methods
used to determine the price target, and
the price target is accompanied by
disclosure concerning the risks that may
impede achievement of the price target.
Testimonials. FINRA Rule 2210(d)(6)
requires that: (i) If a testimonial in a
communication includes a technical
aspect of investing, the person making
the testimonial must have the
knowledge and expertise to form a valid
opinion; and (ii) retail communications
or correspondence providing any
testimonial concerning the investment
advice or investment performance of a
member or its products must also
prominently disclose that the
testimonial: (a) may not be
representative of the experience of other
customers; (b) is no guarantee of future
performance or success; and (c) is a paid
testimonial, if more than $100 in value
has been paid.
Recommendations. FINRA Rule
2210(d)(7)(A) requires that retail
communications that include a
recommendation of securities must have
a reasonable basis for the
recommendation and must disclose, if
applicable, the following: (i) That at the
time the communication was published
or distributed, the member was making
a market in the security being
recommended, or in the underlying
security if the recommended security is
an option or security future, or that the
member or associated persons will sell
to or buy from customers on a principal
basis; (ii) that the member or any
associated person that is directly and
materially involved in the preparation
of the content of the communication has
a financial interest in any of the
securities of the issuer whose securities
are recommended, and the nature of the
financial interest (including, without
limitation, whether it consists of any
option, right, warrant, future, long or
short position), unless the extent of the
financial interest is nominal; and (iii)
that the member was manager or comanager of a public offering of any
securities of the issuer whose securities
are recommended within the past 12
months. Members must provide, or offer
to furnish upon request, available
investment information supporting the
recommendation. When a member
E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM
15NON1
68900
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 221 / Friday, November 15, 2013 / Notices
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
recommends a corporate equity security,
the member must provide the price at
the time the recommendation is made.
Retail communication or
correspondence may not refer, directly
or indirectly, to past specific
recommendations of the member that
were or would have been profitable to
any person; provided, however, that a
retail communication or correspondence
may set out or offer to furnish a list of
all recommendations as to the same
type, kind, grade or classification of
securities made by the member within
the immediately preceding period of not
less than one year, if the communication
or list: (i) States the name of each such
security recommended, the date and
nature of each such recommendation
(e.g., whether to buy, sell or hold), the
market price at that time, the price at
which the recommendation was to be
acted upon, and the market price of
each such security as of the most recent
practicable date; and (ii) contains the
following cautionary legend, which
must appear prominently within the
communication or list: ‘‘it should not be
assumed that recommendations made in
the future will be profitable or will
equal the performance of the securities
in this list.’’
Rule 3.20 (Initial or Partial Payments)
The Exchange also proposes to delete
Exchange Rule 3.20. In January 2010,
FINRA repealed NASD Rule 2450
(Initial or Partial Payments) and does
not currently include a comparable rule
in its rulebook.9 Like NASD Rule 2450,
Exchange Rule 3.20 prohibits any
arrangement whereby the customer of
an Exchange member submits partial or
installment payments for the purchase
of a security with the following
exceptions: (i) If a member is acting as
agent or broker in such transaction, it
must immediately make an actual
purchase of the security for the account
of the customer, and immediately take
possession or control of the security and
maintain possession or control of the
security as long as the member is under
the obligation to deliver the security to
the customer; (ii) if a member is acting
as principal in such transaction, it must,
at the time of the transaction, own such
security and maintain possession or
control of the security as long as the
member is under the obligation to
deliver the security to the customer; and
(iii) if applicable to the member, the
provisions of Regulation T 10 of the
Federal Reserve Board are satisfied.
9 See Exchange Act Release No. 61542 (Feb. 18,
2010), 75 FR 8768 (Feb. 25, 2010) (Order approving
proposal to repeal NASD Rule 2450).
10 Federal Reserve Board, Regulation T (Credit by
Brokers and Dealers), 12 CFR 220 et seq.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:58 Nov 14, 2013
Jkt 232001
Rule 3.20 also prohibits a member,
whether acting as principal or agent, in
connection with any installment or
partial sales transaction, from making
any agreement with a customer whereby
the member would be allowed to pledge
or hypothecate any security involved in
such transaction for any amount in
excess of the indebtedness of the
customer to such member.
The Exchange proposes to repeal
Exchange Rule 3.20 in light of the
explicit provisions in Regulation T
requiring the deposit of sufficient funds
within the specified payment period.
Specifically, Section 220.8 of Regulation
T permits the purchase of a security in
the cash account predicated on either:
(i) There being sufficient funds in the
account; or (ii) the member accepts in
good faith the customer’s agreement that
full cash payment will be made.11 The
rule further stipulates that payment
must be made within a specified
payment period.12 Regulation T also
allows the purchase of a security in a
margin account, whereby a customer
must deposit an initial requirement,
based upon the amount of the
transaction, within the specified
payment period.
The Exchange also believes the
hypothecation prohibition in Exchange
Rule 3.20 would no longer be relevant
because it is predicated on a partial or
installment payment under the rule. The
Exchange notes that, notwithstanding
the repeal of Rule 3.20, members would
still be required to comply with all
applicable federal securities laws,
including Regulation T.
efficient and effective Exchange
rulebook. The Exchange believes that
the proposed rule change would provide
greater harmonization between the
Exchange and FINRA rules of similar
purpose, resulting in greater uniformity
and less burdensome and more efficient
regulatory compliance. As such, the
proposed rule change would foster
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities and would
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Exchange Act Section 6(b)(5),13 which
requires, among other things, that the
Exchange’s rules be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in facilitating transactions in securities,
and to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system. The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change would further
these requirements by eliminating
duplicative and unnecessary rules and
advancing the development of a more
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange filed the proposed rule
change pursuant to Exchange Act
Section 19(b)(3)(A) 14 and Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) 15 thereunder. Because the
proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of
investors or the public interest; (ii)
impose any significant burden on
competition; and (iii) become operative
for 30 days after the date of the filing,
or such shorter time as the Commission
may designate if consistent with the
protection of investors and the public
interest, the proposed rule change has
become effective pursuant to Exchange
Act Section 19(b)(3)(A) and Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) thereunder.16
Section 220.8(a)(1) of Regulation T.
to Section 220.2 of Regulation T,
payment period means the number of business days
in the standard securities settlement cycle in the
United States, as defined in Exchange Act Rule
15c6–1(a) (17 CFR 240.15c6–1(a)), plus two
business days.
13 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change would impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Exchange Act.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is not designed to
address any competitive issues but
rather to provide greater harmonization
among similar Exchange and FINRA
rules, resulting in less burdensome and
more efficient regulatory compliance for
Common Members and facilitating
FINRA’s performance of its regulatory
functions under the 17d–2 Agreement.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited
nor received written comments on the
proposed rule change.
11 See
12 According
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
supra note 3.
16 Exchange Act Rule 19b–4(f)(6) also requires the
Exchange to give the Commission written notice of
its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and text of the proposed
rule change, at least five business days prior to the
15 See
E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM
15NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 221 / Friday, November 15, 2013 / Notices
A proposed rule change filed under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) normally does not
become operative for 30 days after the
date of filing. Pursuant to Rule 19b–
4(f)(6)(iii), however, the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such
action is consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest.17
The Exchange has asked the
Commission to waive the 30-day
operative delay so that the proposal may
become operative immediately upon
filing.
The Commission believes that
waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest
because it will allow the Exchange to
immediately conform its rules to
corresponding FINRA rules. This will
ensure that such EDGX rules will
continue to be covered by the existing
17d–2 Agreement between the Exchange
and FINRA. As noted by the Exchange,
amending EDGX Rule 3.5 would
harmonize Exchange and FINRA rules
of similar purpose reducing duplicative
regulation of Common Members. In
addition, the Commission believes that
the repeal of Rule 3.20 would eliminate
an unnecessary rule from the
Exchange’s rulebook. Accordingly, the
Commission hereby grants the
Exchange’s request and waives the 30day operative delay.18
At any time within sixty (60) days of
the filing of such proposed rule change,
the Commission may summarily
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Exchange Act.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Exchange
Act. Comments may be submitted by
any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
EDGX–2013–40 on the subject line.
date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such
shorter time as designated by the Commission. The
Exchange satisfied this requirement.
17 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
18 For purposes of waiving the 30-day operative
delay, the Commission has considered the proposed
rule’s impact on efficiency, competition and capital
formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:58 Nov 14, 2013
Jkt 232001
68901
Paper Comments
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
Federal Aviation Administration
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–EDGX–2013–40. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all
subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed
rule change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–EDGX–
2013–40 and should be submitted on or
before December 6, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.19
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–27320 Filed 11–14–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
19 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Notice of Intent To Release Certain
Properties From All Terms, Conditions,
Reservations and Restrictions of a
Quitclaim Deed Agreement Between
the City of Marianna and the Federal
Aviation Administration for the
Marianna Municipal Airport, Marianna,
FL
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Request for public comment.
AGENCY:
The FAA hereby provides
notice of intent to release certain airport
properties 28.18 acres at the Marianna
Municipal Airport, Marianna, FL from
the conditions, reservations, and
restrictions as contained in a Quitclaim
Deed agreement between the FAA and
the the City of Marianna, dated August
2, 1947. The release of property will
allow the City of Marianna to dispose of
the property for other than aeronautical
purposes. The property is located at
3595 Industrial Park Drive, Marianna,
Florida 32446, in the southeastern
quadrant of airport property. The parcel
is currently designated nonareonautical
land. The property will be released of its
federal obligations to allow for a swap
of other property needed for
aeronautical purposes. The parcel to be
received by the Airport is 57.81 acres
and is located in the Runway Protection
Zone of Runway 36. The fair market
value of the parcel to be released has
been determined to be $200,000. The
fair market value of the parcel to be
received has been determined to be
$159,000. The Airport will also receive
a benefit of enhanced safety by
acquiring Runway Protection Zone
lands.
Documents reflecting the Sponsor’s
request are available, by appointment
only, for inspection at the Marianna
Municipal Airport and the FAA
Airports District Office.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
125 of The Wendell H. Ford Aviation
Investment and Reform Act for the 21st
Century (AIR–21) requires the FAA to
provide an opportunity for public notice
and comment prior to the ‘‘waiver’’ or
‘‘modification’’ of a sponsor’s Federal
obligation to use certain airport land for
non-aeronautical purposes.
DATES: Comments are due on or before
December 16, 2013.
ADDRESSES: Documents are available for
review at Marianna Municipal Airport,
and the FAA Airports District Office,
5950 Hazeltine National Drive, Suite
400, Orlando, FL 32822. Written
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM
15NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 221 (Friday, November 15, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68897-68901]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27320]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-70836; File No. SR-EDGX-2013-40]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend
EDGX Rule 3.5 (Advertising Practices) and To Repeal Rule 3.20 (Initial
or Partial Payments) To Conform with the Rules of the Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
November 8, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Exchange Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby
given that on October 28, 2013, EDGX Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'' or
``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which items have been substantially prepared by the Exchange.
The Exchange has designated the proposed rule change as constituting a
``non-controversial'' rule change under Exchange Act Rule 19b-4(f)(6),
which renders the proposal effective upon receipt of this filing by the
Commission.\3\ The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend EDGX Rule 3.5 (Advertising
Practices) and repeal EDGX Rule 3.20 (Initial or Partial Payments) to
conform with the rules of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority,
Inc. (``FINRA'') for purposes of an agreement between the Exchange and
FINRA pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 17d-2.\4\ The text of the proposed
rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at https://www.directedge.com, at the Exchange's principal office, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 17 CFR 240.17d-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 17d-2,\5\ the Exchange and FINRA
entered into an agreement to allocate regulatory responsibility for
common rules (``17d-2 Agreement''). The 17d-2 Agreement covers common
members of the Exchange and FINRA (``Common Members'') and allocates to
FINRA regulatory responsibility, with respect to Common Members, for
the following: (i) Examination of Common Members for compliance with
federal securities laws,
[[Page 68898]]
rules and regulations and rules of the Exchange that the Exchange has
certified as identical or substantially similar to FINRA rules; (ii)
investigation of Common Members for violations of federal securities
laws, rules and regulations, and the rules of the Exchange that the
Exchange has certified as identical or substantially identical to FINRA
rules; and (iii) enforcement of compliance by Common Members with the
federal securities laws, rules and regulations, and the rules of the
Exchange that the Exchange has certified as identical or substantially
similar to FINRA rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 17d-2 Agreement included a certification by the Exchange that
states that the requirements contained in certain Exchange rules are
identical to, or substantially similar to, certain FINRA rules that
have been identified as comparable. To conform with comparable FINRA
rules for purposes of the 17d-2 Agreement, the Exchange proposes to:
(i) amend EDGX Rule 3.5 (Advertising Practices) and (ii) repeal EDGX
Rule 3.20 (Initial or Partial Payments).
EDGX Rule 3.5 (Advertising Practices)
The Exchange proposes to delete the current text of Rule 3.5 and
adopt text that would require Exchange members to comply with FINRA
Rule 2210 as if such Rule were part of the Exchange's rules and to
rename the rule ``Communications with the Public.'' \6\ The proposed
rule text is substantially the same as Rule 2210(a) of the Nasdaq Stock
Market LLC (``Nasdaq''), which was approved by the Commission.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The Exchange does not propose to require that its members
comply with subparagraph (c) of FINRA Rule 2210. FINRA Rule 2210(c)
generally requires that FINRA members file certain communications
with FINRA. The Exchange believes that it is inappropriate for its
rules to require its members to file certain communications with
FINRA as such filing requirements under FINRA rules are between
FINRA and its members.
\7\ See Exchange Act Release No. 58069 (Jun. 30, 2008), 73 FR
39360 (Jul. 9, 2008) (Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently, Exchange Rule 3.5(d) and (f) are excluded from the 17d-2
Agreement because they are not are identical to, or substantially
similar to, certain FINRA rules. First, Exchange Rule 3.5(d) requires
that advertising and sales literature be pre-approved and signed or
initialed by a supervisor while FINRA Rule 2210(b) only requires
supervisory pre-approval for retail communication, and imposes
different supervisory review standards for institutional communication,
and correspondence. Second, Rule 3.5(f) and FINRA Rule 2210(d)(6)
contain different content requirements for testimonials. Exchange Rule
3.5(d) and (f) were, therefore, excluded from the 17d-2 Agreement
because their requirements were not identical or substantially similar
to those required under FINRA Rule 2210(b) and (d)(6) respectively. To
harmonize its rules with FINRA, the Exchange proposes to delete the
current text of Rule 3.5 and adopt text that would require its members
to comply with FINRA Rule 2210 as if it was part of the Exchange's
rules so that Rule 3.5 can be incorporated into the 17d-2 Agreement in
its entirety.
The Exchange believes that these changes would help to avoid
confusion among its members that are also FINRA members by further
aligning the Exchange Rule 3.5 with FINRA Rule 2210. The proposed
changes to Rule 3.5 are designed to enable the Exchange to incorporate
Rule 3.5 into the 17d-2 Agreement, further reducing duplicative
regulation of Exchange members that are also FINRA members.
Summary of FINRA Rule 2210
FINRA Rule 2210 generally sets forth the content, filing,
supervisory review, and record retention for FINRA members'
communications with the public. A summary of FINRA Rule 2210 is below.
A complete description of FINRA Rule 2210 is provided in FINRA's
Regulatory Notice 12-29.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See FINRA Regulatory Notice 12-29 (June 2012) available at
https://finra.complinet.com/net_file_store/new_rulebooks/f/i/FINRANotice12_29.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINRA Rule 2210 divides a member's communications with the public
into the following three categories:
Institutional communication. FINRA Rule 2210(a)(3) defines
``institutional communication'' as ``any written (including electronic)
communication that is distributed or made available only to
institutional investors, but does not include a member's internal
communications.''
Retail communication. FINRA Rule 2210(a)(5) defines
``retail communication'' as ``any written (including electronic)
communication that is distributed or made available to more than 25
retail investors within any 30-day calendar period.'' ``Retail
investor'' includes any person other than an institutional investor,
regardless of whether the person has an account with the firm.
Communications that are considered advertisements and sales literature
fall under the definition of ``retail communication.''
Correspondence. FINRA Rule 2210(a)(2) defines
``correspondence'' as ``any written (including electronic)
communication that is distributed or made available to fewer than 25
retail investors within any 30-day calendar period.''
Supervisory Review. To comply with FINRA Rules 2210(b)'s
supervisory requirements, Common Members must obtain supervisory pre-
approval of all retail communications, while institutional
communications and correspondence would be subject to supervisory
review, but not pre-approval.
Under FINRA Rule 2210(b)(1), all retail communications must be
approved by a supervisor prior to their first use or filing with FINRA
under FINRA Rule 2210(c). FINRA's Rule 2210(b)(1)'s supervisory
requirements do not apply to a retail communication if, at the time
that a member intends to publish or distribute it: (i) Another member
has filed it with FINRA and has received a letter from FINRA stating
that it appears to be consistent with applicable standards; and (ii)
the member has not materially altered it and will not use it in a
manner that is inconsistent with the conditions of FINRA's letter. The
rule's supervisory review requirements also do not apply to the
following retail communications, provided that the member supervises
and reviews such communications in the same manner as required for
supervising and reviewing correspondence pursuant to NASD Rule 3010(d):
(i) Any retail communication that is excepted from the definition of
``research report'' pursuant to NASD Rule 2711(a)(9)(A), unless the
communication makes any financial or investment recommendation; (ii)
any retail communication that is posted on an online interactive
electronic forum; and (iii) any retail communication that does not make
any financial or investment recommendation or otherwise promote a
product or service of the member.
For institutional communications, FINRA Rule 2210(b)(3) requires a
member to establish written procedures that are appropriate to its
business, size, structure, and customers for the review by an
appropriately qualified registered principal of institutional
communications used by the member and its associated persons. Such
procedures must be reasonably designed to ensure that institutional
communications comply with applicable standards. When such procedures
do not require review of all institutional communications prior to
their first use or distribution, they must include provisions for: (i)
The education and training of associated persons as to the firm's
procedures governing institutional communications; (ii) the
documentation of such education and
[[Page 68899]]
training; and (iii) surveillance and follow-up to ensure that such
procedures are implemented and adhered to. A member must maintain and
make available to FINRA upon request evidence that these supervisory
procedures have been implemented and carried out.
FINRA Rule 2210(b)(2) states that correspondence is subject to the
supervision and review requirements of NASD Rule 3010(d). Under NASD
Rule 3010(d)(2), each member shall develop written procedures that are
appropriate to its business, size, structure, and customers for the
review of incoming and outgoing written (i.e., non-electronic) and
electronic correspondence with the public relating to its investment
banking or securities business. These written procedures should include
procedures: (i) To review incoming, written correspondence directed to
registered representatives and related to the member's investment
banking or securities business; (ii) to properly identify and handle
customer complaints; and (iii) to ensure that customer funds and
securities are handled in accordance with firm procedures. When such
procedures do not require review of all correspondence prior to their
first use or distribution, they must include provisions for: (i) The
education and training of associated persons as to the firm's
procedures governing correspondence; (ii) the documentation of such
education and training; and (iii) surveillance and follow-up to ensure
that such procedures are implemented and adhered to.
Record Retention. Under FINRA Rule 2210(b)(4)(A), members must
maintain all retail communications and institutional communications for
the retention period required by Exchange Act Rule 17a-4(b) and in a
format and media that comply with Exchange Act Rule 17a-4. The records
must include:
A copy of the communication and the dates of first and (if
applicable) last use of such communication;
the name of any registered principal who approved the
communication and the date that approval was given;
in the case of a retail communication or an institutional
communication that is not approved prior to first use by a registered
principal, the name of the person who prepared or distributed the
communication;
information concerning the source of any statistical
table, chart, graph or other illustration used in the communication;
and
for any retail communication for which principal approval
is not required pursuant to FINRA Rule 2210(b)(1)(C), the name of the
member that filed the retail communication with the Department, and a
copy of the corresponding review letter from the Department.
Filing Requirements. Like Nasdaq Rule 2210(a), Exchange Rule 3.5
would expressly state that Exchange members would not be required to
comply with FINRA Rule 2210(c). FINRA Rule 2210(c) generally requires
FINRA members to file certain retail communications with FINRA prior to
their first use. Exchange members who are also FINRA members would
continue to be subject to FINRA Rule 2210(c).
Content Standards. FINRA Rule 2210(d) sets forth general content
standards for all communications. More specifically, all member
communications must be based on principles of fair dealing and good
faith, must be fair and balanced, and must provide a sound basis for
evaluating the facts in regard to any particular security or type of
security, industry, or service. No member may omit any material fact or
qualification if the omission, in light of the context of the material
presented, would cause the communication to be misleading. No member
may make any false, exaggerated, unwarranted, promissory or misleading
statement or claim in any communication. No member may publish,
circulate or distribute any communication that the member knows or has
reason to know contains any untrue statement of a material fact or is
otherwise false or misleading. Information may be placed in a legend or
footnote only in the event that such placement would not inhibit an
investor's understanding of the communication. Members must ensure that
statements are clear and not misleading within the context in which
they are made, and that they provide balanced treatment of risks and
potential benefits. Communications must be consistent with the risks of
fluctuating prices and the uncertainty of dividends, rates of return
and yield inherent to investments. Members must consider the nature of
the audience to which the communication will be directed and must
provide details and explanations appropriate to the audience.
Communications may also not predict or project performance, imply
that past performance will recur or make any exaggerated or unwarranted
claim, opinion or forecast; provided, however, communications may
include: (i) A hypothetical illustration of mathematical principles,
provided that it does not predict or project the performance of an
investment or investment strategy; (ii) an investment analysis tool, or
a written report produced by an investment analysis tool, that meets
the requirements of FINRA Rule 2214; and (iii) a price target contained
in a research report on debt or equity securities, provided that the
price target has a reasonable basis, the report discloses the valuation
methods used to determine the price target, and the price target is
accompanied by disclosure concerning the risks that may impede
achievement of the price target.
Testimonials. FINRA Rule 2210(d)(6) requires that: (i) If a
testimonial in a communication includes a technical aspect of
investing, the person making the testimonial must have the knowledge
and expertise to form a valid opinion; and (ii) retail communications
or correspondence providing any testimonial concerning the investment
advice or investment performance of a member or its products must also
prominently disclose that the testimonial: (a) may not be
representative of the experience of other customers; (b) is no
guarantee of future performance or success; and (c) is a paid
testimonial, if more than $100 in value has been paid.
Recommendations. FINRA Rule 2210(d)(7)(A) requires that retail
communications that include a recommendation of securities must have a
reasonable basis for the recommendation and must disclose, if
applicable, the following: (i) That at the time the communication was
published or distributed, the member was making a market in the
security being recommended, or in the underlying security if the
recommended security is an option or security future, or that the
member or associated persons will sell to or buy from customers on a
principal basis; (ii) that the member or any associated person that is
directly and materially involved in the preparation of the content of
the communication has a financial interest in any of the securities of
the issuer whose securities are recommended, and the nature of the
financial interest (including, without limitation, whether it consists
of any option, right, warrant, future, long or short position), unless
the extent of the financial interest is nominal; and (iii) that the
member was manager or co-manager of a public offering of any securities
of the issuer whose securities are recommended within the past 12
months. Members must provide, or offer to furnish upon request,
available investment information supporting the recommendation. When a
member
[[Page 68900]]
recommends a corporate equity security, the member must provide the
price at the time the recommendation is made.
Retail communication or correspondence may not refer, directly or
indirectly, to past specific recommendations of the member that were or
would have been profitable to any person; provided, however, that a
retail communication or correspondence may set out or offer to furnish
a list of all recommendations as to the same type, kind, grade or
classification of securities made by the member within the immediately
preceding period of not less than one year, if the communication or
list: (i) States the name of each such security recommended, the date
and nature of each such recommendation (e.g., whether to buy, sell or
hold), the market price at that time, the price at which the
recommendation was to be acted upon, and the market price of each such
security as of the most recent practicable date; and (ii) contains the
following cautionary legend, which must appear prominently within the
communication or list: ``it should not be assumed that recommendations
made in the future will be profitable or will equal the performance of
the securities in this list.''
Rule 3.20 (Initial or Partial Payments)
The Exchange also proposes to delete Exchange Rule 3.20. In January
2010, FINRA repealed NASD Rule 2450 (Initial or Partial Payments) and
does not currently include a comparable rule in its rulebook.\9\ Like
NASD Rule 2450, Exchange Rule 3.20 prohibits any arrangement whereby
the customer of an Exchange member submits partial or installment
payments for the purchase of a security with the following exceptions:
(i) If a member is acting as agent or broker in such transaction, it
must immediately make an actual purchase of the security for the
account of the customer, and immediately take possession or control of
the security and maintain possession or control of the security as long
as the member is under the obligation to deliver the security to the
customer; (ii) if a member is acting as principal in such transaction,
it must, at the time of the transaction, own such security and maintain
possession or control of the security as long as the member is under
the obligation to deliver the security to the customer; and (iii) if
applicable to the member, the provisions of Regulation T \10\ of the
Federal Reserve Board are satisfied. Rule 3.20 also prohibits a member,
whether acting as principal or agent, in connection with any
installment or partial sales transaction, from making any agreement
with a customer whereby the member would be allowed to pledge or
hypothecate any security involved in such transaction for any amount in
excess of the indebtedness of the customer to such member.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Exchange Act Release No. 61542 (Feb. 18, 2010), 75 FR
8768 (Feb. 25, 2010) (Order approving proposal to repeal NASD Rule
2450).
\10\ Federal Reserve Board, Regulation T (Credit by Brokers and
Dealers), 12 CFR 220 et seq.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to repeal Exchange Rule 3.20 in light of the
explicit provisions in Regulation T requiring the deposit of sufficient
funds within the specified payment period. Specifically, Section 220.8
of Regulation T permits the purchase of a security in the cash account
predicated on either: (i) There being sufficient funds in the account;
or (ii) the member accepts in good faith the customer's agreement that
full cash payment will be made.\11\ The rule further stipulates that
payment must be made within a specified payment period.\12\ Regulation
T also allows the purchase of a security in a margin account, whereby a
customer must deposit an initial requirement, based upon the amount of
the transaction, within the specified payment period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Section 220.8(a)(1) of Regulation T.
\12\ According to Section 220.2 of Regulation T, payment period
means the number of business days in the standard securities
settlement cycle in the United States, as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 15c6-1(a) (17 CFR 240.15c6-1(a)), plus two business days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also believes the hypothecation prohibition in
Exchange Rule 3.20 would no longer be relevant because it is predicated
on a partial or installment payment under the rule. The Exchange notes
that, notwithstanding the repeal of Rule 3.20, members would still be
required to comply with all applicable federal securities laws,
including Regulation T.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Exchange Act Section 6(b)(5),\13\ which requires, among other
things, that the Exchange's rules be designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, and to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system. The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change would further these requirements by eliminating
duplicative and unnecessary rules and advancing the development of a
more efficient and effective Exchange rulebook. The Exchange believes
that the proposed rule change would provide greater harmonization
between the Exchange and FINRA rules of similar purpose, resulting in
greater uniformity and less burdensome and more efficient regulatory
compliance. As such, the proposed rule change would foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in
securities and would remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of
a free and open market and a national market system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change would
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Exchange Act. The Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change is not designed to address any
competitive issues but rather to provide greater harmonization among
similar Exchange and FINRA rules, resulting in less burdensome and more
efficient regulatory compliance for Common Members and facilitating
FINRA's performance of its regulatory functions under the 17d-2
Agreement.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on
the proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The Exchange filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Exchange
Act Section 19(b)(3)(A) \14\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \15\ thereunder.
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days after the date of the filing, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become effective
pursuant to Exchange Act Section 19(b)(3)(A) and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\15\ See supra note 3.
\16\ Exchange Act Rule 19b-4(f)(6) also requires the Exchange to
give the Commission written notice of its intent to file the
proposed rule change, along with a brief description and text of the
proposed rule change, at least five business days prior to the date
of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as
designated by the Commission. The Exchange satisfied this
requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 68901]]
A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) normally does
not become operative for 30 days after the date of filing. Pursuant to
Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii), however, the Commission may designate a shorter
time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and
the public interest.\17\ The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive
the 30-day operative delay so that the proposal may become operative
immediately upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest
because it will allow the Exchange to immediately conform its rules to
corresponding FINRA rules. This will ensure that such EDGX rules will
continue to be covered by the existing 17d-2 Agreement between the
Exchange and FINRA. As noted by the Exchange, amending EDGX Rule 3.5
would harmonize Exchange and FINRA rules of similar purpose reducing
duplicative regulation of Common Members. In addition, the Commission
believes that the repeal of Rule 3.20 would eliminate an unnecessary
rule from the Exchange's rulebook. Accordingly, the Commission hereby
grants the Exchange's request and waives the 30-day operative
delay.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ For purposes of waiving the 30-day operative delay, the
Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency,
competition and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within sixty (60) days of the filing of such proposed
rule change, the Commission may summarily temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Exchange Act.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Exchange Act. Comments may be submitted
by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please
include File Number SR-EDGX-2013-40 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-EDGX-2013-40. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies
of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-EDGX-2013-40 and should be
submitted on or before December 6, 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\19\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-27320 Filed 11-14-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P