Certain Handheld Magnifiers and Products Containing Same; Institution of Investigation Pursuant to United States Code, 68862-68863 [2013-27319]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
68862
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 221 / Friday, November 15, 2013 / Notices
U.S. Patent No. 6,424,292 (‘‘the ’292
patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,161,561 (‘‘the
’561 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No.
7,768,447 (‘‘the ’447 patent’’). The
complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337.
The complainants request that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
limited exclusion order and cease and
desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record
for this investigation may be viewed on
the Commission’s electronic docket
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2013).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
November 8, 2013, ordered that —
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain navigation
products, including GPS devices,
navigation and display systems, radar
systems, navigational aids, mapping
systems and related software by reason
of infringement of one or more of claims
1–5, and 7–20 of the ’565 patent; claims
1–6 of the ’292 patent; claims 1–10, 12,
and 14 of the ’561 patent; and claims 1–
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:58 Nov 14, 2013
Jkt 232001
25 of the ’447 patent, and whether an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337;
(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule
210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the
presiding administrative law judge shall
take evidence or other information and
hear arguments from the parties and
other interested persons with respect to
the public interest in this investigation,
as appropriate, and provide the
Commission with findings of fact and a
recommended determination on this
issue, which shall be limited to the
statutory public interest factors, 19
U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1);
(3) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainants are:
Furuno Electric Co., Ltd., 9–52
Ashihara-cho, Nishinomiya City,
Hyogo, 662–8580 Japan
Furuno U.S.A., Inc., 4400 NW. Pacific
Rim Boulevard, Camas, WA 98607
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
¨
Garmin Ltd., Muhlentalstrasse 2, 8200
Schaffhausen, Switzerland
Garmin International, Inc., 1200 East
151st Street, Olathe, KS 66062
Garmin North America, Inc., 1200 East
151st Street, Olathe, KS 66062
Garmin USA, Inc., 1200 East 151st
Street, Olathe, KS 66062
˚
Navico Holding AS, Nyaskaiveien 2,
4370 Egersund, Norway
Navico UK Limited, Premier Way,
Abbey Park, Romsey Hampshire, S051
9DH, United Kingdom
Navico Inc., 4500 S. 129th East Avenue,
Suite 200, Tulsa, OK 74134
Raymarine, Inc., 9 Townsend West,
Nashua, NH 03063
Raymarine UK Ltd., Marine House,
Cartwright Drive, Fareham, PO15 5RJ,
United Kingdom
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(4) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 8, 2013.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–27318 Filed 11–14–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–901]
Certain Handheld Magnifiers and
Products Containing Same; Institution
of Investigation Pursuant to United
States Code
U.S. International Trade
Commission
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
September 26, 2013, under section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Freedom
Scientific, Inc. of St. Petersburg, Florida.
The complaint alleges violations of
section 337 based upon the importation
into the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the
United States after importation of
certain handheld magnifiers and
products containing same by reason of
infringement of U.S. Design Patent No.
D624,107 (‘‘the ’107 design patent’’) and
certain claims of U.S. Patent No.
8,264,598 (‘‘the ’598 patent’’). The
complaint further alleges that an
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM
15NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 221 / Friday, November 15, 2013 / Notices
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
limited exclusion order and cease and
desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record
for this investigation may be viewed on
the Commission’s electronic docket
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2013).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
November 8, 2013, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain handheld
magnifiers and products containing
same by reason of infringement of one
or more of the claim of the ’107 design
patent and claims 1–7 of the ’598 patent,
and whether an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:58 Nov 14, 2013
Jkt 232001
Freedom Scientific, Inc., 11800 31st
Court North, St. Petersburg, FL
33716–1805.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Aumed Group Corp., 3/F Building D,
No. 31 Jiaoda Dong Road, Haidian
District, Beijing 100044, China.
Aumed Inc., 131 Glenn Way, Unit 5,
San Carlos, CA 94070.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 8, 2013.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–27319 Filed 11–14–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
68863
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed
Stipulation, Consent Decree and
Settlement Agreement Under the
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act and the Comprehensive
Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act
On November 8, 2013, the Department
of Justice lodged a proposed Stipulation,
Consent Decree and Settlement
Agreement with the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of New York in In re DPH
Holdings Corporation, et al., Civil
Action No. 05–44481 (RDD).
Under the settlement, Reorganized
Debtor DPH Holdings Corporation,
f/k/a Delphi Corporation, and certain of
its affiliated Reorganized Debtors have
agreed to transfer title to four debtorowned real properties to an
environmental response trust and
contribute a total of $23,142,065.00 to
the trust to fund clean-up of these
properties and the administrative
expenses of the trust. The beneficiaries
of the environmental response trust will
be United States on behalf of the EPA,
the State of Michigan on behalf of the
Michigan Department of Environmental
Quality (‘‘MDEQ’’) and the State of Ohio
on behalf of the Ohio Environmental
Protection Agency (‘‘Ohio EPA’’).
The environmental response trust will
receive $9,148,524 for the Delphi
Automotive Systems Dort Highway Flint
East Plant 400 and Plant 500 in Flint,
Michigan, $10,425,449 for the former
Delphi Saginaw Division Plant 2 in
Saginaw, Michigan, $1,191,641 for an
inactive asbestos landfill in Rootstown,
Ohio, formerly operating under Delphi’s
Packard Electric/Electronic Architecture
Division, and $2,376,451 for the
administrative expenses of the trust.
The Reorganized Debtors also will pay
$157,935 as an allowed administrative
expense claim for oversight costs
incurred with respect to the Dayton
VOC Site in Dayton, Ohio.
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment on the
Stipulation, Consent Decree and
Settlement Agreement. Comments
should be addressed to the Assistant
Attorney General, Environment and
Natural Resources Division, and should
refer to In re DPH Holdings Corporation,
et al., Civil Action No. 05–44481 (RDD),
D.J. Ref. No. 90–11–3–08913. All
comments must be submitted no later
than fifteen (15) days after the
publication date of this notice.
Comments may be submitted either by
email or by mail:
E:\FR\FM\15NON1.SGM
15NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 221 (Friday, November 15, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68862-68863]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27319]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337-TA-901]
Certain Handheld Magnifiers and Products Containing Same;
Institution of Investigation Pursuant to United States Code
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on September 26, 2013, under
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on
behalf of Freedom Scientific, Inc. of St. Petersburg, Florida. The
complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation
into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of certain handheld magnifiers and
products containing same by reason of infringement of U.S. Design
Patent No. D624,107 (``the '107 design patent'') and certain claims of
U.S. Patent No. 8,264,598 (``the '598 patent''). The complaint further
alleges that an
[[Page 68863]]
industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2)
of section 337.
The complainant requests that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion
order and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112, Washington,
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205-2560.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2013).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on November 8, 2013, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain handheld
magnifiers and products containing same by reason of infringement of
one or more of the claim of the '107 design patent and claims 1-7 of
the '598 patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is:
Freedom Scientific, Inc., 11800 31st Court North, St. Petersburg, FL
33716-1805.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
Aumed Group Corp., 3/F Building D, No. 31 Jiaoda Dong Road, Haidian
District, Beijing 100044, China.
Aumed Inc., 131 Glenn Way, Unit 5, San Carlos, CA 94070.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436;
and
(3) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 8, 2013.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-27319 Filed 11-14-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
