Certain Vision-Based Driver Assistance System Cameras and Components Thereof; Institution of Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337, 68475-68476 [2013-27208]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 220 / Thursday, November 14, 2013 / Notices
TKELleY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this review may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On October 21, 2013,
the Commission determined that the
domestic interested party group
response to its notice of institution (78
FR 39321, July 1, 2013) of the subject
five-year review was adequate and that
the respondent interested party group
response was inadequate. The
Commission did not find any other
circumstances that would warrant
conducting a full review.1 Accordingly,
the Commission determined that it
would conduct an expedited review
pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act.2
Staff report.—A staff report
containing information concerning the
subject matter of the review will be
placed in the nonpublic record on
December 2, 2013, and made available
to persons on the Administrative
Protective Order service list for this
review. A public version will be issued
thereafter, pursuant to section
207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s rules.
Written submissions.—As provided in
section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s
rules, interested parties that are parties
to the review and that have provided
individually adequate responses to the
notice of institution,3 and any party
other than an interested party to the
review may file written comments with
the Secretary on what determination the
Commission should reach in the review.
Comments are due on or before
December 9, 2013 and may not contain
new factual information. Any person
that is neither a party to the five-year
review nor an interested party may
submit a brief written statement (which
shall not contain any new factual
information) pertinent to the review by
1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the
Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any
individual Commissioner’s statements will be
available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s Web site.
2 Commissioner F. Scott Kieff did not participate
in this vote.
3 The Commission has found the responses
submitted by Anvil, LP and Ward Manufacturing,
LLC to be individually adequate. Comments from
other interested parties will not be accepted (see 19
CFR 207.62(d)(2)).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:20 Nov 13, 2013
Jkt 232001
December 9, 2013. However, should the
Department of Commerce extend the
time limit for its completion of the final
results of its review, the deadline for
comments (which may not contain new
factual information) on Commerce’s
final results is three business days after
the issuance of Commerce’s results. If
comments contain business proprietary
information (BPI), they must conform
with the requirements of sections 201.6,
207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s
rules. Please be aware that the
Commission’s rules with respect to
electronic filing have been amended.
The amendments took effect on
November 7, 2011. See 76 FR 61937
(October 6, 2011) and the newly revised
Commission’s Handbook on E-Filing,
available on the Commission’s Web site
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
In accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the rules, each document
filed by a party to the review must be
served on all other parties to the review
(as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service
must be timely filed. The Secretary will
not accept a document for filing without
a certificate of service.
Determination.—The Commission has
determined to exercise its authority to
extend the review period by up to 90
days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)(B)
because this review is ‘‘extraordinarily
complicated’’ pursuant to 19. U.S.C.
1675 (c)(5)(C)(ii).
Authority: This review is being conducted
under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act
of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to
section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules.
Issued: November 7, 2013.
By order of the Commission.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–27212 Filed 11–13–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–899]
Certain Vision-Based Driver
Assistance System Cameras and
Components Thereof; Institution of
Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
1337
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
September 20, 2013, under section 337
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
68475
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of TRW
Automotive U.S. LLC of Livonia,
Michigan. A supplement to the
complaint was filed on October 17,
2013. The complaint alleges violations
of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain vision-based driver assistance
system cameras and components thereof
by reason of infringement of certain
claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,807,287
(‘‘the ‘287 patent’’), and that an industry
in the United States exists as required
by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
limited exclusion order and a cease and
desist order.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record
for this investigation may be viewed on
the Commission’s electronic docket
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2013).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
November 6, 2013, ordered that–
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM
14NON1
TKELleY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
68476
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 220 / Thursday, November 14, 2013 / Notices
importation of certain vision-based
driver assistance system cameras and
components thereof by reason of
infringement of one or more of claims 1,
2, 3, and 8 of the ‘287 patent, and
whether an industry in the United
States exists as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is: TRW
Automotive U.S. LLC, 12001 Tech
Center Drive, Livonia, MI 48150.
(b) The respondent is the following
entity alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and is the party upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Magna Electronics, Inc., 601 Abbot
Road, East Lansing, MI 48823.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondent in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of the respondent to file a
timely response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
Issued: November 7, 2013.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:20 Nov 13, 2013
Jkt 232001
By order of the Commission.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–27208 Filed 11–13–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[USITC SE–13–030]
Sunshine Act Meeting
United
States International Trade Commission
TIME AND DATE: November 15, 2013 at
9:30 a.m.
PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, Telephone:
(202) 205–2000.
STATUS: Open to the public
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
1. Agendas for future meetings: none
2. Minutes
3. Ratification List
4. Vote in Inv. Nos. 701–TA–503–504
and 731–TA–1229–1230 (Preliminary)
(Monosodium Glutamate from China
and Indonesia). The Commission is
currently scheduled to complete and file
its determinations on or before
November 18, 2013; Commissioners’
opinions will be issued on November
25, 2013.
5. Outstanding action jackets: none
In accordance with Commission
policy, subject matter listed above, not
disposed of at the scheduled meeting,
may be carried over to the agenda of the
following meeting. Earlier notification
of this meeting was not possible.
AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:
By order of the Commission:
Issued: November 7, 2013.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–27361 Filed 11–12–13; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed
Consent Decree Under the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act
On November 6, 2013, the United
States Department of Justice lodged a
proposed Operable Unit Three Consent
Decree (‘‘Decree’’) with the United
States District Court for the District of
New Jersey in the lawsuit entitled
United States v. Air Products and
Chemicals, Inc., et al., Civil Action No.
13–6695 (CCC) (MF).
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The proposed consent decree
provides for the performance of a
remedial action, pursuant to the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability
Act, 42 U.S.C. § 9601, et seq., selected
by the United States Environmental
Protection Agency for Operable Unit
Three (‘‘OU 3’’) at the Scientific
Chemical Processing (‘‘SCP’’) Superfund
Site in Carlstadt, Bergen County, New
Jersey.
The OU 3 remedial action for the SCP
Carlstadt site will be performed by a
group of Settling Defendants, consisting
of Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.,
Akzo Nobel Coatings, Inc., AlcatelLucent USA Inc., ARKEMA Inc.,
Ashland Inc., Avantor Performance
Materials, Inc., Avery Dennison
Corporation, BASF Corporation,
Benjamin Moore & Co., Ber Mar
Manufacturing Corp., Bristol-Myers
Squibb Company, Browning-Ferris
Industries of New Jersey, Inc., CBS
Corporation, Chemcoat Inc., CNA
Holdings LLC, Continental Holdings
Inc., Cycle Chem, Inc., Cytec Industries,
Inc., Dri-Print Foils, Inc., E. I. du Pont
de Nemours and Company, Exxon Mobil
Corporation/ExxonMobil Oil
Corporation, General Electric Company,
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC, Goodrich
Corporation, HCR ManorCare, Inc.,
Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc., Honeywell
International Inc., John L. Armitage &
Co., Johnson & Johnson, Kirker
Enterprises, Inc., L.E. Carpenter &
Company, LANXESS Corporation, Mack
Trucks, Inc., Merck & Co., Inc.,
Momentive Specialty Chemicals Inc.,
Nepera, Inc., New England Laminates
Co., Inc., Northrop Grumman Systems
Corporation, Occidental Chemical
Corporation, Pan Technology, Inc.,
Permacel, Pfizer Inc, Pharmacia LLC,
Revlon Consumer Products Corporation,
Rohm and Haas Company, Seagrave
Coatings Corp. (NJ), SI Group, Inc.,
Siegfried (USA), Inc., Simon Wrecking
Company, Inc./Simon Resources, Inc./
Mid State Trading Co., The Dow
Chemical Company, The Warner
Lambert Co., LLC, 3M Company, Trane
U.S., Inc., Union Carbide Corporation,
United Technologies Corporation, and
Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C.
The proposed consent decree also
requires the defendants to pay $50,000
for reimbursement of EPA past costs at
the site.
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment on the
consent decree. Comments should be
addressed to the Assistant Attorney
General, Environment and Natural
Resources Division, and should refer to
United States v. Air Products and
Chemicals, Inc., et al., D.J. Ref. No. 90–
E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM
14NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 220 (Thursday, November 14, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68475-68476]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27208]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337-TA-899]
Certain Vision-Based Driver Assistance System Cameras and
Components Thereof; Institution of Investigation Pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
1337
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on September 20, 2013, under
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on
behalf of TRW Automotive U.S. LLC of Livonia, Michigan. A supplement to
the complaint was filed on October 17, 2013. The complaint alleges
violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain vision-based driver assistance system
cameras and components thereof by reason of infringement of certain
claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,807,287 (``the `287 patent''), and that an
industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2)
of section 337.
The complainant requests that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion
order and a cease and desist order.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112, Washington,
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205-2560.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2013).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on November 6, 2013, ordered that-
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after
[[Page 68476]]
importation of certain vision-based driver assistance system cameras
and components thereof by reason of infringement of one or more of
claims 1, 2, 3, and 8 of the `287 patent, and whether an industry in
the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337;
(2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is: TRW Automotive U.S. LLC, 12001 Tech Center
Drive, Livonia, MI 48150.
(b) The respondent is the following entity alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and is the party upon which the complaint is
to be served: Magna Electronics, Inc., 601 Abbot Road, East Lansing, MI
48823.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436;
and
(3) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondent in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of the respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
Issued: November 7, 2013.
By order of the Commission.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-27208 Filed 11-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P