Certain Marine Sonar Imaging Devices, Products Containing the Same, and Components Thereof; Institution of Investigation Pursuant to United States Code, 68091-68092 [2013-27070]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 13, 2013 / Notices
material injury by reason of subsidized
imports of steel concrete reinforcing bar
from Turkey and LTFV imports of steel
concrete reinforcing bar from Mexico
and Turkey. Accordingly, effective
September 4, 2013, the Commission
instituted countervailing duty
investigation No. 701–TA–502 and
antidumping duty investigation Nos.
731–TA–1227–1228 (Preliminary).
Notice of the institution of the
Commission’s investigations and of a
public conference to be held in
connection therewith was given by
posting copies of the notice in the Office
of the Secretary, U.S. International
Trade Commission, Washington, DC,
and by publishing the notice in the
Federal Register of September 11, 2013
(78 FR 55755). The conference was held
in Washington, DC, on September 25,
2013, and all persons who requested the
opportunity were permitted to appear in
person or by counsel.
The Commission transmitted its
determinations in these investigations to
the Secretary of Commerce on
November 6, 2013.3 The views of the
Commission are contained in USITC
Publication 4432 (November 2013),
entitled Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar
from Mexico and Turkey: Investigation
Nos. 701–TA–502 and 731–TA–1227–
1228.
Issued: November 6, 2013.
By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013–27069 Filed 11–12–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–898]
Certain Marine Sonar Imaging Devices,
Products Containing the Same, and
Components Thereof; Institution of
Investigation Pursuant to United States
Code
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
September 20, 2013, under section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Navico, Inc.
of Tulsa, Oklahoma and Navico Holding
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
3 Due to the lapse in appropriations and ensuing
cessation of Commission operations, all import
injury investigations conducted under authority of
Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930 have been tolled
by 16 days. 78 FR 64011, October 25, 2013.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Nov 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
AS of Norway. The complaint alleges
violations of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain marine sonar imaging devices,
products containing the same, and
components thereof by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent No. 8,305,840 (‘‘the ’840 patent’’)
and U.S. Patent No. 8,300,499 (‘‘the ’499
patent’’). The complaint further alleges
that an industry in the United States
exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of
section 337.
The complainants request that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
limited exclusion order and cease and
desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its Internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record
for this investigation may be viewed on
the Commission’s electronic docket
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Office of the Secretary, Docket Services
Division, U.S. International Trade
Commission, telephone (202) 205–1802.
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2013).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
November 6, 2013, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain marine sonar
imaging devices, products containing
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
68091
the same, and components thereof by
reason of infringement of one or more of
claims 1, 4, 6–20, 22, 23, 25–27, 29, 32–
59, 61, 62, 66, and 68–73 of the ’840
patent and claims 1, 2, 17, 19–21, 23–
25, 40, 42–44, 59, 62–66, and 69–81 of
the ’499 patent, and whether an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainants are:
Navico, Inc., 4500 South 129th East
Avenue, Suite 200, Tulsa, OK 74134
Navico Holding AS, Nyaskaiveien 2,
4370 Egersund, Norway
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Raymarine, Inc., 9 Townsend West,
Nashua, NH 03063
Raymarine UK Ltd., Marine
House,Cartwright Drive, Fareham
PO15 5RJ, United Kingdom
In-Tech Electronics Ltd., Unit A, 13/F,
Wing Tai Centre, 12 Hing Yip St.,
Kwun Tong, Kowloon, Hong Kong
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations will not participate as a
party in this investigation.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM
13NON1
68092
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 13, 2013 / Notices
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
Issued: November 6, 2013.
By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013–27070 Filed 11–12–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1103–0016]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comments Requested: Certification of
Identity
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
ACTION:
60-Day notice.
The Department of Justice (DOJ),
Justice Management Division, will be
submitting the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
The proposed information collection is
published to obtain comments from the
public and affected agencies. Comments
are encouraged and will be accepted for
‘‘sixty days’’ until January 13, 2014.
This process is conducted in accordance
with 5 CFR 1320.10.
If you have comments especially on
the estimated public burden or
associated response time, suggestions,
or need a copy of the proposed
information collection instrument with
instructions or additional information,
please contact Evie Sassok, 145 N Street
NW., Washington, DC 20530.
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Your
comments should address one or more
of the following four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Nov 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of This Information
Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Extension of a currently approved
collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection:
Certification of Identity
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
Department of Justice sponsoring the
collection: Form DOJ–361. Facilities and
Administrative Services Staff, Justice
Management Division, U.S. Department
of Justice.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Primary: American Citizens.
Other: Federal Government. The
information collection will be used by
the Department to identify individuals
requesting certain records under the
Privacy Act. Without this form an
individual cannot obtain the
information requested.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: It is estimated that 69,000
respondents will complete each form
within approximately 30 minutes.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: There are an estimated total
of 34,500 annual burden hours
associated with this collection.
If additional information is required
contact: Jerri Murray, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Two Constitution
Square, 145 N Street NE., 3W–1407B,
Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: November 7, 2013.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2013–27118 Filed 11–12–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–CW–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed
Consent Decree Amendment Under the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act
On November 5, 2013, the Department
of Justice lodged a proposed consent
decree amendment with the United
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
States District Court for the District of
South Carolina in the lawsuit entitled
United States of America v. AILS, LLC,
as successor-in-interest to ABCO
Industries, Ltd., et al., Civil Action No.
6:92–cv–0153–20, regarding the
remedial action at the Medley Farm
Superfund Site located in Gaffney,
Cherokee County, South Carolina
(‘‘Site’’).
In 1992, the Court entered a consent
decree in the matter of United States v.
ABCO Industries, Ltd., et al., (‘‘1992
Consent Decree’’) under which
defendants agreed to perform the
remedial action at the Site consistent
with the Environmental Protection
Agency’s (‘‘EPA’s’’) 1991 Record of
Decision. The 1992 Consent Decree
required defendants to, among other
things, utilize a groundwater pump-andtreat system to address contaminated
groundwater. The effectiveness of this
system declined through time. In 2012,
EPA issued an Amended Record of
Decision, amending the groundwater
component of the remedy to employ
enhanced reductive dechlorination as
an active treatment process to address
groundwater contamination, and
selecting monitored natural attenuation
as the contingency remedy. The
proposed consent decree amendment
includes the revised groundwater
cleanup remedy and contingency
remedy of the 2012 Amended Record of
Decision and addresses other changes
such as to the names of defendants. The
consent decree amendment was signed
by the following defendants: AILS, LLC,
as successor-in-interest to ABCO
Industries, Ltd.; BASF Corporation;
Colonial Heights Packaging Inc.; Ethox
Chemicals, LLC; Expert Management
Inc. on behalf of National Starch and
Chemical Company; Henkel
Corporation, as successor-in-interest to
Tanner Chemicals, Inc., f/k/a/EvodeTanner; and Milliken & Company.
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment on the
consent decree amendment. Comments
should be addressed to the Assistant
Attorney General, Environment and
Natural Resources Division, and should
refer to United States v. AILS, LLC as
successor-in-interest to ABCO
Industries, Ltd., et al., D.J. Ref. No. 90–
11–3–104A. All comments must be
submitted no later than thirty (30) days
after the publication date of this notice.
Comments may be submitted either by
email or by mail:
To submit
comments:
Send them to:
By email .........
pubcomment-ees.enrd@
usdoj.gov.
E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM
13NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 13, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68091-68092]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27070]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-898]
Certain Marine Sonar Imaging Devices, Products Containing the
Same, and Components Thereof; Institution of Investigation Pursuant to
United States Code
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on September 20, 2013, under
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on
behalf of Navico, Inc. of Tulsa, Oklahoma and Navico Holding AS of
Norway. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after importation of certain marine sonar
imaging devices, products containing the same, and components thereof
by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No.
8,305,840 (``the '840 patent'') and U.S. Patent No. 8,300,499 (``the
'499 patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the
United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complainants request that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion
order and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112, Washington,
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of the Secretary, Docket
Services Division, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205-1802.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2013).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on November 6, 2013, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain marine sonar
imaging devices, products containing the same, and components thereof
by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1, 4, 6-20, 22, 23,
25-27, 29, 32-59, 61, 62, 66, and 68-73 of the '840 patent and claims
1, 2, 17, 19-21, 23-25, 40, 42-44, 59, 62-66, and 69-81 of the '499
patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required
by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainants are:
Navico, Inc., 4500 South 129th East Avenue, Suite 200, Tulsa, OK 74134
Navico Holding AS, Nyaskaiveien 2, 4370 Egersund, Norway
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
Raymarine, Inc., 9 Townsend West, Nashua, NH 03063
Raymarine UK Ltd., Marine House,Cartwright Drive, Fareham PO15 5RJ,
United Kingdom
In-Tech Electronics Ltd., Unit A, 13/F, Wing Tai Centre, 12 Hing Yip
St., Kwun Tong, Kowloon, Hong Kong
(3) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not participate as
a party in this investigation.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination
[[Page 68092]]
and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in
the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both
directed against the respondent.
Issued: November 6, 2013.
By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2013-27070 Filed 11-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
