Transamerica Life Insurance Company, et al; Notice of Application, 68103-68107 [2013-27039]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 13, 2013 / Notices
electronically from the publicly
available records component of NRC’s
document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is
accessible from the NRC Web site at
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html
(the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Persons who do not have access to
ADAMS or who encounter problems in
accessing the documents located in
ADAMS should contact the NRC Public
Document Room reference staff by
telephone at (800) 397–4209 or (301)
415–4737 (available between 8:00 a.m.
and 4:00 p.m., Eastern Time (ET),
Monday through Friday except federal
holidays), or by email to pdr@nrc.gov.
It is so ordered.
For the Atomic Safety and Licensing
Board. Rockville, Maryland.
Dated: November 6, 2013.
Michael M. Gibson,
Chairman, Administrative Judge.
[FR Doc. 2013–27145 Filed 11–12–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2013–0001]
Sunshine Act Meetings Notice
Weeks of November 11, 18, 25,
December 2, 9, 16, 2013.
PLACE: Commissioners’ Conference
Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland.
STATUS: Public and Closed.
DATE:
Week of November 11, 2013
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of November 11, 2013.
Week of November 18, 2013—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of November 18, 2013.
Week of November 25, 2013—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of November 25, 2013.
Week of December 2, 2013—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of December 2, 2013.
Week of December 9, 2013—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of December 9, 2013.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Week of December 16, 2013—Tentative
There are no meetings scheduled for
the week of December 16, 2013.
*
*
*
*
*
The schedule for Commission
meetings is subject to change on short
notice. To verify the status of meetings,
call (recording)—301–415–1292.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Nov 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
Contact person for more information:
Rochelle Bavol, 301–415–1651.
*
*
*
*
*
The NRC Commission Meeting
Schedule can be found on the Internet
at: https://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/
public-meetings/schedule.html.
*
*
*
*
*
The NRC provides reasonable
accommodation to individuals with
disabilities where appropriate. If you
need a reasonable accommodation to
participate in these public meetings, or
need this meeting notice or the
transcript or other information from the
public meetings in another format (e.g.
braille, large print), please notify
Kimberly Meyer, NRC Disability
Program Manager, at 301–287–0727, or
by email at Kimberly.MeyerChambers@nrc.gov. Determinations on
requests for reasonable accommodation
will be made on a case-by-case basis.
*
*
*
*
*
Members of the public may request to
receive this information electronically.
If you would like to be added to the
distribution, please contact the Office of
the Secretary, Washington, DC 20555
(301–415–1969), or send an email to
Darlene.Wright@nrc.gov.
Dated: November 7, 2013.
Rochelle C. Bavol,
Policy Coordinator, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–27279 Filed 11–8–13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
68103
Oral presentations may not exceed ten
(10) minutes. The time for individual
presentations may be reduced
proportionately, if necessary, to afford
all participants who have submitted a
timely request an opportunity to be
heard.
Participants wishing to submit a
written statement for the record must
submit a copy of such statement to
OPIC’s Corporate Secretary no later than
5 p.m. Wednesday, November 27, 2013.
Such statement must be typewritten,
double spaced, and may not exceed
twenty-five (25) pages.
Upon receipt of the required notice,
OPIC will prepare an agenda, which
will be available at the hearing, that
identifies speakers, the subject on which
each participant will speak, and the
time allotted for each presentation.
A written summary of the hearing will
be compiled, and such summary will be
made available, upon written request to
OPIC’s Corporate Secretary, at the cost
of reproduction.
CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION:
Information on the hearing may be
obtained from Connie M. Downs at (202)
336–8438, via facsimile at (202) 408–
0297, or via email at Connie.Downs@
opic.gov.
Dated: November 8, 2013.
Connie M. Downs,
OPIC Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–27280 Filed 11–8–13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3210–01–P
OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT
CORPORATION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Notice; December 4,
2013 Public Hearing.
[Release No. 30776; File No. 812–14133]
2:00 p.m., Wednesday,
December 4, 2013.
PLACE: Offices of the Corporation,
Twelfth Floor Board Room, 1100 New
York Avenue NW., Washington, DC.
STATUS: Hearing OPEN to the Public at
2:00 p.m.
PURPOSE: Public Hearing in conjunction
with each meeting of OPIC’s Board of
Directors, to afford an opportunity for
any person to present views regarding
the activities of the Corporation.
PROCEDURES: Individuals wishing to
address the hearing orally must provide
advance notice to OPIC’s Corporate
Secretary no later than 5 p.m.
Wednesday, November 27, 2013. The
notice must include the individual’s
name, title, organization, address, and
telephone number, and a concise
summary of the subject matter to be
presented.
TIME AND DATE:
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Transamerica Life Insurance Company,
et al; Notice of Application
November 6, 2013.
The Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice of application for an
order under Section 6(c) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940, as
amended (the ‘‘1940 Act’’) granting
exemptions from the provisions of
Sections 2(a)(32), 22(c), and 27(i)(2)(A)
of the 1940 Act and Rule 22c–1
thereunder.
AGENCY:
Transamerica Life
Insurance Company (‘‘TLIC’’),
Transamerica Financial Life Insurance
Company (‘‘TFLIC’’) (each a ‘‘Company’’
and collectively, the ‘‘Companies’’);
Separate Account VA B (‘‘TLIC
Account’’), Separate Account VA BNY
(‘‘TFLIC Account’’) (each an ‘‘Account’’
and collectively, the ‘‘Accounts’’); and
APPLICANTS:
E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM
13NON1
68104
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 13, 2013 / Notices
Transamerica Capital, Inc. (‘‘TCI’’). The
Companies, the Accounts and TCI are
collectively referred herein as the
‘‘Applicants.’’
SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: The
Applicants seek an order under Section
6(c) of the 1940 Act to the extent
necessary to permit, under specified
circumstances, the recapture of certain
bonus credits applied to purchase
payments made with respect to certain
flexible premium variable annuity
policies issued by the Companies.
DATES: Filing Date: The application was
filed on March 14, 2013, and amended
and restated applications were filed on
June 5, 2013 and on October 11, 2013.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An
order granting the application will be
issued unless the Commission orders a
hearing. Interested persons may request
a hearing by writing to the
Commission’s Secretary and serving
Applicants with a copy of the request,
personally or by mail. Hearing requests
should be received by the Commission
by 5:30 p.m. on December 2, 2013, and
should be accompanied by proof of
service on the Applicants, in the form
of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a
certificate of service. Hearing requests
should state the nature of the requester’s
interest, the reason for the request, and
the issues contested. Persons may
request notification of a hearing by
writing to the Secretary of the
Commission.
Secretary, Securities and
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
Applicants: Transamerica Life Insurance
Company and Separate Account VA B,
Transamerica Financial Life Insurance
Company and Separate Account VA
BNY, 4333 Edgewood Road NE., Cedar
Rapids, IA 52499–4240; Transamerica
Capital, Inc., 4600 South Syracuse
Street, Suite 1100, Denver CO 80237.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michelle Roberts, Senior Counsel, or
Joyce M. Pickholz, Branch Chief,
Insured Investments Office, Division of
Investment Management at (202) 551–
6795.
ADDRESSES:
The
following is a summary of the
application. The complete application
may be obtained via the Commission’s
Web site by searching for the file
number, or an Applicant using the
Company name box, at https://
www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by
calling (202) 551–8090.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Applicants’ Representations
1. Applicants seek an order under
Section 6(c) of the 1940 Act to the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Nov 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
extent necessary to permit, under
specified circumstances, the recapture
of certain bonus credits applied to
purchase payments made with respect
to certain variable annuity policies,
including endorsements thereto, and
certificates under group policies
marketed under the names
‘‘Transamerica Variable Annuity
Series—X Share,’’ ‘‘Members Variable
Annuity Series—X Share,’’ and
‘‘Partners Variable Annuity Series—X
Share’’ (‘‘Policies’’) as described in the
application as well as variable annuity
policies, including endorsements
thereto, and certificates under group
policies issued by the Companies in the
future that are substantially similar in
all respects to the Policies (‘‘Future
Policies’’). The Applicants seek to
recapture bonus credits from the
Policies where the bonus credit was
applied within the preceding twelve
(12) months and the owner withdraws
from or surrenders the Policy and there
is no surrender charge or an otherwise
applicable surrender charge (or
contingent deferred sales load) is
waived, because (i) an owner exercises
his or her ‘‘free look’’ option; (ii) a death
benefit is payable; (iii) an owner
annuitizes the Policy; or (iv) an owner
exercises a provision or rider providing
for waiver of the surrender charge under
the Nursing Care and Terminal
Condition Withdrawal Option or the
Unemployment Waiver as defined in the
Policy. The order would also apply to
any other separate accounts of the
Companies or their affiliated companies
that are controlling, controlled by, or
under common control with the
Companies (‘‘Future Accounts’’) that
support Future Policies. Applicants also
request that the order being sought
extend to any Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority (‘‘FINRA’’)
member broker-dealers which may, in
the future, act as principal underwriter
of such Policies or Future Policies
(‘‘Future Underwriters’’) and any
successors in interest 1 to the
Applicants.
2. TLIC is a stock life insurance
company organized under the laws of
the state of Iowa. TFLIC is a stock life
insurance company organized under the
laws of the state of New York. The TLIC
Account is registered under the 1940
Act as a unit investment trust (File No.
811–06032). Interests in the TLIC
Account offered through certain flexible
premium variable annuity policies have
been registered under the Securities Act
1 Successors in interest is defined as any entity or
entities that result from a reorganization into
another jurisdiction, a change in control or a change
in the type of business organization.
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of 1933 (‘‘1933 Act’’) on Form N–4 (File
No. 333–185573).
3. The TFLIC Account is registered
under the Act as a unit investment trust
(File No. 811–08750). Interests in the
TFLIC Account offered through certain
flexible premium variable annuity
policies have been registered under the
1933 Act on Form N–4 (File No. 333–
185574).
4. Each Account is comprised of
subaccounts established to receive and
invest net purchase payments under the
Policies (each a ‘‘Subaccount’’).
5. TCI, an affiliate of the Companies,
is the principal underwriter and the
distributor of the Policies for the
Accounts. TCI is registered with the
Commission as a broker-dealer under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is a member of FINRA.
6. TLIC issues the Policies in all states
except New York. TFLIC issues the
Policies only in New York. The Policies
provide for accumulation of values on a
variable basis, fixed basis, or both
during the accumulation period, and
may provide settlement or annuity
payment options on a variable basis,
fixed basis, or both. The Policies may be
purchased on a non-qualified tax basis.
The Policies may also be purchased and
used in connection with plans
qualifying for favorable federal income
tax treatment.
7. The owner determines in the
application or transmittal form for a
Policy how the net premium payments
will be allocated among the
Subaccounts of the Accounts and any
available guaranteed period options or
dollar cost averaging options of the
fixed account. The policy value will
vary with the investment performance
of the Subaccounts selected, and the
owner bears the entire risk for amounts
allocated to an Account.
8. For each premium payment an
owner makes, the Companies may add
a bonus credit equal to a percentage of
the premium payment to the owner’s
policy value. The Companies do not
assess a specific charge for the bonus
credit. The Companies expect to use a
portion of the mortality and expense
risk charge, the administrative fee, and/
or the surrender charge to pay for the
bonus credit. The credit percentage is
determined by the annuitant’s age at the
time of each premium payment.
Currently, the bonus credit as a
percentage of each premium payment
equals 5.5% (ages 0–59), 5.0% (ages 60–
69), 4.0% (ages 70–79) and 2.0% (ages
80+). The percentage could vary based
on state laws. The Companies may vary
the bonus credit percentage from
premium to premium and/or based on
the annuitant’s attained age at the time
E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM
13NON1
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 13, 2013 / Notices
a premium payment is made, but the
bonus credit will never be less than
0.25% nor more than 7%.
9. An owner may return his or her
Policy for a refund. This is called the
‘‘Right to Cancel Period’’ or ‘‘Free Look
Right.’’ An owner will generally have 10
days to return his or her Policy
depending on the state where the Policy
is issued. The Companies will not assess
surrender charges against a Policy
returned during the Right to Cancel
Period.
10. Under the Policies, each Company
will pay a death benefit under certain
circumstances. The Policies also offer an
optional Additional Death Distribution
rider and an Additional Death
Distribution+ rider which pay an
additional death benefit amount when a
death benefit is payable during the
accumulation phase. A discussion of the
death benefits offered under the Policies
is included in the application. The
Applicants may add other optional
death benefit riders to the Policies in the
future.
11. Policy owners may select one of
several optional living benefits. The
Policies offer three guaranteed lifetime
withdrawal benefits, which guarantee a
minimum amount may be withdrawn
annually from the Policy for the lifetime
of the annuitant, regardless of market
performance and even if these
withdrawals reduce the policy value to
zero. The Policies also offer the
Guaranteed Principal Solution Rider,
which provides a guaranteed minimum
accumulation benefit and a guaranteed
minimum withdrawal benefit. The
guaranteed minimum accumulation
benefit guarantees that the policy value
will equal a specified value on a
specified future date. A discussion of
the features of the Policies, including
the optional living benefits, is included
in the application. The Applicants may
add other living benefit riders to the
Policies in the future.
12. An owner may transfer policy
values. Transfers may be limited, or a
charge may apply. Transfers and
withdrawals from a guaranteed period
option of the fixed account prior to the
end of the guaranteed period are
generally subject to an excess interest
adjustment (except for policies issued in
New York by TFLIC). This adjustment
will also be made to amounts that an
owner applies to an annuity payment
option.
13. An owner may surrender a Policy
or make a partial withdrawal from the
policy value during the Accumulation
Period. If an owner surrenders a Policy
or takes a partial withdrawal, a
Company may deduct a surrender
charge to compensate it for expenses
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Nov 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
relating to sales, including commissions
to registered representatives and other
promotional expenses. An owner
generally may be permitted to withdraw
certain limited amounts free of a
surrender charge. The following charts
show the surrender charges that apply
to the Policies:
Number of years since
premium payment date
Surrender
charge (as a
percentage of
premium
payment
withdrawn)
1 ............................................
2 ............................................
3 ............................................
4 ............................................
5 ............................................
6 ............................................
7 ............................................
8 ............................................
9 ............................................
10+ ........................................
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
A Company will waive the surrender
charges if an owner withdraws money
under the Nursing Care and Terminal
Condition Withdrawal Option or the
Unemployment Waiver. Those riders are
discussed in the application.
14. In states where permitted, if an
owner takes a surrender or withdrawal
under the Nursing Care and Terminal
Condition Withdrawal Option or
Unemployment Waiver, the Company
will reduce the amount of the surrender
value by the total bonus credits the
Company credited to an owner’s policy
value during the 12 months before the
surrender or withdrawal.
15. The owner may elect or change an
annuity payment option during the
lifetime of the annuitant. The first
annuity payment will be made as of the
annuity commencement date. The
owner generally may change the annuity
commencement date, subject to
specified limits. The amount of each
annuity payment under the annuity
payment options will depend on the sex
(if allowed) and age of the annuitant (or
annuitants) at the time the first payment
is due and the payment option.
16. The Companies deduct various
fees and charges, which may include a
daily mortality and expense risk fee; a
daily administrative charge; an annual
service or policy charge; premium taxes;
surrender charges (contingent deferred
sales loads); and fees for optional
benefits or riders.
Applicants’ Legal Analysis
1. Section 6(c) authorizes the
Commission, by order upon application,
to conditionally or unconditionally
grant an exemption from any provision,
rule or regulation of the 1940 Act to the
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
68105
extent that the exemption is necessary
or appropriate in the public interest and
consistent with the protection of
investors and the purposes fairly
intended by the policy and provisions of
the 1940 Act.
2. Applicants request exemptions for
the Policies described in the
application, and for Future Policies that
are substantially similar in all material
respects to the Policies described
herein, from Sections 2(a)(32), 22(c),
and 27(i)(2)(a) of the Act, and Rule 22c–
1 thereunder, pursuant to Section 6(c),
to the extent necessary to recapture the
bonus credit applied to a premium
payment within the preceding twelve
(12) months when the owner withdraws
from or surrenders the Policy and there
is no surrender charge, or an otherwise
applicable surrender charge (or
contingent deferred sales load) is
waived, because: (i) An owner exercises
his or her ‘‘free-look’’ option, (ii) a death
benefit is payable, (iii) an owner
annuitizes the Policy; or (iv) an owner
exercises a provision or rider providing
for the waiver of the surrender charge
under the Nursing Care and Terminal
Condition Withdrawal Option or the
Unemployment Waiver as defined in the
Policy.
3. Section 27(i) provides that Section
27 does not apply to any registered
separate account funding variable
insurance contracts, nor to the
sponsoring insurance company and
principal underwriter of such account,
except as provided for in Section
27(i)(2)(A) of the 1940 Act. Section
27(i)(2)(A), in pertinent part, makes it
unlawful for any registered separate
account funding variable insurance
contracts, or for the sponsoring
insurance company of such account, to
sell any such contract unless such
contract is a redeemable security.
4. Section 2(a)(32) of the 1940 Act
defines ‘‘redeemable security’’ as any
security under the terms of which the
holder, upon its presentation to the
issuer, is entitled to receive
approximately his proportionate share
of the issuer’s current net assets, or the
cash equivalent thereof.
5. The Applicants submit that the
bonus recapture provisions in the
Policies do not deprive the owner of his
or her proportionate share of the issuer’s
current net assets. An owner’s right to
the bonus credit will vest in full one
year after a Company applies the bonus
credit. Until that time, a Company
retains the right and interest in the
dollar amount of any unvested bonus
credit amount. Thus, when a Company
recaptures a bonus credit, it is only
retrieving its own assets, and because an
owner’s interest in the bonus credit is
E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM
13NON1
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
68106
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 13, 2013 / Notices
not vested, such owner would not be
deprived of a proportionate share of the
Account’s assets (the issuer’s current net
assets) in violation of Section 2(a)(32).
However, to avoid uncertainty as to full
compliance with the 1940 Act, the
Applicants request an exemption from
the provisions of Sections (2)(a)(32) and
27(i)(2)(A) to the extent deemed
necessary to permit them to recapture
the bonus credit under the Policies and
Future Policies.
6. Section 22(c) of the 1940 Act states
that the Commission may make rules
and regulations applicable to registered
investment companies and to principal
underwriters of, and dealers in, the
redeemable securities of any registered
investment company to accomplish the
same ends as contemplated by Section
22(a). Rule 22c–1, promulgated under
Section 22(c) of the 1940 Act, in
pertinent part, prohibits a registered
investment company issuing a
redeemable security (and a person
designated in such issuer’s prospectus
as authorized to consummate
transactions in such security, and a
principal underwriter of, or dealer in,
any such security) from selling,
redeeming, or repurchasing any such
security except at a price based on the
current net asset value of such security
which is next computed after receipt of
a tender of such security for redemption
or of an order to purchase or sell such
security.
7. The Applicants note that a
Company’s addition of the bonus credit
might arguably be viewed as resulting in
an owner purchasing a redeemable
security for a price below the current
net asset value. Further, a Company’s
recapture of the bonus credit might
arguably be viewed as resulting in the
redemption of a redeemable security for
a price other than one based on the
current net asset value of an Account.
The Applicants submit, however, that
the bonus credit does not violate
Section 22(c) and Rule 22c–1.
8. An owner’s interest in his or her
policy value or in an Account would
always be offered at a price next
determined on the basis of net asset
value. The granting of a bonus credit
does not reflect a reduction of that price.
Instead, the Companies will purchase
with their own general account assets an
interest in an Account equal to the
bonus credit. Applicants submit that
because the bonus credit will be paid
out of Company assets, not Account
assets, no dilution will occur as a result
of the credit.
9. The Applicants contend that the
recapture of the bonus credit does not
involve either of the evils that the
Commission intended to eliminate or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Nov 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
reduce with Rule 22c–1; namely, (1) the
dilution of the interests of other security
holders and (2) speculative trading
practices that are unfair to such holders.
The Applicants note that these evils
were the result of backward pricing, the
practice of basing the price of a mutual
fund share on the net asset value per
share determined, as of the close of the
market on the previous day. Backward
pricing allowed investors to take
advantage of increases or decreases in
net asset value that were not yet
reflected in the price, thereby diluting
the values of outstanding mutual fund
shares.
10. The Applicants submit that the
proposed recapture of the bonus credit
does not pose such threat of dilution.
The bonus credit recapture will not alter
an owner’s net asset value. Each
Company will determine an owner’s net
cash surrender value under a Policy in
accordance with Rule 22c–1 on a basis
next computed after receipt of an
owner’s request for surrender (likewise,
the calculation of death benefits and
annuity payment amounts will be in full
compliance with the forward pricing
requirement of Rule 22c–1). The amount
recaptured will equal the amount of the
bonus credit that a Company paid out of
its general account assets. Although an
owner will retain any investment gain
attributable to the bonus credit, a
Company will determine the amount of
such gain on the basis of the current net
asset value of the Subaccount. Thus, no
dilution will occur upon the recapture
of the bonus credit.
11. The Applicants further submit
that the other harm that Rule 22c–1 was
designed to address, speculative trading
practices calculated to take advantage of
backward pricing, will not occur as a
result of a Company’s recapture of the
bonus credit.
12. For the reasons set forth above,
Applicants submit that Rule 22c–1 and
Section 22(c) should have no
application to the bonus credit as
neither of the harms that Rule 22c–1
was designed to address are found in
the recapture of the bonus credit.
However, to avoid uncertainty as to full
compliance with the Act, the Applicants
request an exemption from the
provisions of Section 22(c) and Rule
22c–1 to the extent deemed necessary to
permit them to recapture the bonus
credit under the Policies and Future
Policies.
13. The Applicants contend that a
Company’s recapture of the bonus credit
is designed to prevent anti-selection
against that Company. The risk of antiselection would be that an owner could
make significant premium payments
into the Policy solely in order to receive
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
a quick profit from the credit. By
recapturing a bonus credit, a Company
protects itself against the risk that an
owner will make such large premium
payments, receive a bonus credit, and
then withdraw his or her money from
the Policy under one of the
circumstances described herein.
Furthermore, a Company’s recapture of
the bonus credit is designed to protect
the Company against the risk that
owners will not hold the Policy for a
sufficient period of time for the
Company to recover its costs related to
providing the bonus credit.
14. The Applicants also contend that
it would be inherently unfair to allow
an owner exercising the free-look
privilege in a Policy to retain the bonus
credit when returning the Policy for a
refund after a period of only a few days
(usually 10 or less). If a Company could
not recapture the bonus credit,
individuals might purchase a Policy
with no intention of retaining it, and
simply return it for a quick profit. By
recapturing the bonus credit, a
Company will prevent such individuals
from doing so.
15. Applicants seek relief requested
herein not only for themselves with
respect to the Policies, but also with
respect to Future Accounts or Future
Policies. In addition, Applicants seek
relief herein with respect to Future
Underwriters (i.e., a class consisting of
FINRA member broker-dealers which
may in the future act as principal
underwriter of the Policies and Future
Policies). Applicants represent that the
terms of the relief requested with
respect to any Future Underwriters are
consistent with the standards set forth
in section 6(c) of the 1940 Act and
Commission precedent.
16. Applicants represent that the
terms of the relief requested with
respect to any Policies or Future
Policies issued by the Companies and
funded by the Accounts or Future
Accounts are consistent with the
standards set forth in Section 6(c) of the
1940 Act and Commission precedent.
Applicants state that, without the
requested class relief, exemptive relief
for any Future Account, Future Policy
or Future Underwriter would have to be
requested and obtained separately.
Applicants assert that these additional
requests for exemptive relief would
present no issues under the 1940 Act
not already addressed herein.
Applicants state that if the Applicants
were to repeatedly seek exemptive relief
with respect to the same issues
addressed herein, investors would not
receive additional protection or benefit,
and investors and the Applicants could
be disadvantaged by increased costs
E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM
13NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 13, 2013 / Notices
from preparing such additional requests
for relief. Applicants argue that the
requested class relief is appropriate in
the public interest because the relief
will promote competitiveness in the
variable annuity market by eliminating
the need for the Companies or their
affiliates to file redundant exemptive
applications, thereby reducing
administrative expenses and
maximizing efficient use of resources.
Applicants submit that elimination of
the delay and the expense of repeatedly
seeking exemptive relief would enhance
each Applicant’s ability to effectively
take advantage of business opportunities
as such opportunities arise.
17. All entities that currently intend
to rely on the requested order are named
as Applicants. Any entity that relies
upon the requested order in the future
will comply with the terms and
conditions contained in this
Application.
Conclusion
For the reasons summarized above,
Applicants represent that: the requested
exemptions are necessary and
appropriate in the public interest and
consistent with the protection of
investors and the purposes fairly
intended by the policy and provisions of
the 1940 Act; and their request for class
exemptions is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest and consistent
with the protection of investors and the
purposes fairly intended by the policy
and provisions of the 1940 Act.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, pursuant to
delegated authority.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–27039 Filed 11–12–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–70349]
Order Exempting Broker-Dealers
Participating in the Proposed Global
Offering of Meridian Energy Limited
From the Arranging Prohibitions of
Section 11(d)(1) of the Exchange Act
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
September 9, 2013.
By letter dated September 6, 2013
(‘‘Request’’), Deutsche Bank AG, New
Zealand Branch/Craigs Investment
Partners Limited, Goldman Sachs New
Zealand and Macquarie Capital (New
Zealand) Limited/Macquarie Securities
(NZ) Limited (together, ‘‘Joint Lead
Managers’’ or ‘‘JLMs’’) and their
respective U.S. broker-dealer affiliates
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:14 Nov 12, 2013
Jkt 232001
(‘‘U.S. Selling Agents’’) requested that
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) grant an
exemption order pursuant to Section
36(a) of the Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Exchange Act’’).1
The Request pertains to the
application of the arranging prohibitions
of Section 11(d)(1) of the Exchange Act 2
to the proposed U.S. offering, as
described in your Request (the
‘‘Proposed U.S. Offering’’) by Her
Majesty the Queen in right of New
Zealand, acting by and through the
Minister of Finance and the Minister for
State Owned Enterprises (the ‘‘Crown’’),
of ordinary shares (the ‘‘Shares’’) of
Meridian Energy Limited (‘‘Meridian’’
or the ‘‘Company’’), in connection with
Meridian’s proposed global initial
public offering (‘‘Proposed Global
Offering’’).
You represent that the Proposed
Global Offering, including the Proposed
U.S. Offering, will be conducted on an
installment payment basis in the form of
installment receipts (‘‘Installment
Receipts’’), with the purchase price to
be payable in two installments. The
securities to be offered and sold in the
Proposed U.S. Offering will not be
registered under the Securities Act of
1933 (the ‘‘Securities Act’’), but instead
will be offered and sold to persons
reasonably believed to be ‘‘qualified
institutional buyers’’ (‘‘QIBs’’), as
defined in Rule 144A 3 under the
Securities Act, in transactions exempt
from the registration requirements of the
Securities Act pursuant to Rule 144A
thereunder. As a result, the Shares
offered and sold in the Proposed U.S.
Offering would be represented by
Installment Receipts. The Proposed U.S.
Offering of Installment Receipts may be
deemed to involve a ‘‘new issue’’ for
purposes of Section 11(d)(1). Thus, the
Joint Lead Managers’ and the U.S.
Selling Agents’ participation in the
Proposed U.S. Offering of Meridian may
be within the scope of the arranging
prohibitions of Section 11(d)(1) of the
Exchange Act.
You have requested that the
Commission grant an exemption
pursuant to Section 36(a) of the
Exchange Act from the arranging
prohibitions of Section 11(d)(1). You
note that the exemption requested is in
all material respects identical to the
relief that the Commission has
previously granted in connection with
New Zealand and Australian global
1 15
U.S.C. 78mm(a).
U.S.C. 78k(d)(1).
3 17 CFR 230.144A.
2 15
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
68107
offerings that have been conducted on
an installment payment basis.4
Section 11(d)(1) of the Exchange Act
generally prohibits a broker-dealer from
extending or maintaining credit, or
arranging for the extension or
maintenance of credit, on shares of new
issue securities, if the broker-dealer
participated in the distribution of the
new issue securities within the
preceding 30 days. The Joint Lead
Managers and their U.S. Selling Agents
are broker-dealers. The Proposed U.S.
Offering of Installment Receipts in the
manner described in your Request may
be deemed to involve an extension of
credit, and the activities of the Joint
Lead Managers and the U.S. Selling
Agents participating in the Proposed
U.S. Offering might, therefore, be
deemed to be an arrangement of credit
subject to Section 11(d)(1) of the
Exchange Act.
Based on the facts and representations
set forth in your Request, the
Commission finds that it is appropriate
in the public interest and consistent
with the protection of investors to grant,
and hereby grants, to the Joint Lead
Managers and the U.S. Selling Agents
participating in the Proposed Global
Offering by the Crown, of Shares of
Meridian a limited exemption pursuant
to Section 36(a) of the Exchange Act
from the prohibitions on arranging for
the extension of credit contained in
Section 11(d)(1) of the Exchange Act. In
the absence of the exemption, Section
11(d)(1) would effectively preclude the
Joint Lead Managers and U.S. Selling
Agents from selling the Installment
Receipts in the United States since any
brokers or dealers participating in the
Proposed U.S. Offering may be deemed
to be arranging credit in the form of the
Installment Receipts that they offer and
sell to QIBs. The exemption will allow
sophisticated U.S. investors that meet
the definition of a QIB to purchase the
Installment Receipts in the Proposed
U.S. Offering where the protections of
the U.S. securities laws will be
available, including the anti-fraud
protections, rather than in overseas
4 The Commission has exempted broker-dealers
from the arranging provision of Section 11(d)(1) in
similar offerings. See Letter from Catherine
McGuire, Chief Counsel, Division of Trading and
Markets, Commission, to William C.F. Kurz, Esq.,
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP re: Telstra
Corporation Limited, dated October 5, 2006; Letter
from Catherine McGuire, Chief Counsel, Division of
Trading and Markets, Commission, to William C.F.
Kurz, Esq., Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
re: Macquarie Media Holdings Limited and
Macquarie Media Trust, dated September 27, 2005;
and Letter from Catherine McGuire, Chief Counsel,
Division of Trading and Markets, Commission, to
Frederick Wertheim, Esq., Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
re: Spark Infrastructure Group, dated November 8,
2005 (revised November 29, 2005).
E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM
13NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 13, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68103-68107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27039]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 30776; File No. 812-14133]
Transamerica Life Insurance Company, et al; Notice of Application
November 6, 2013.
AGENCY: The Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').
ACTION: Notice of application for an order under Section 6(c) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the ``1940 Act'') granting
exemptions from the provisions of Sections 2(a)(32), 22(c), and
27(i)(2)(A) of the 1940 Act and Rule 22c-1 thereunder.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicants: Transamerica Life Insurance Company (``TLIC''),
Transamerica Financial Life Insurance Company (``TFLIC'') (each a
``Company'' and collectively, the ``Companies''); Separate Account VA B
(``TLIC Account''), Separate Account VA BNY (``TFLIC Account'') (each
an ``Account'' and collectively, the ``Accounts''); and
[[Page 68104]]
Transamerica Capital, Inc. (``TCI''). The Companies, the Accounts and
TCI are collectively referred herein as the ``Applicants.''
Summary of Application: The Applicants seek an order under Section
6(c) of the 1940 Act to the extent necessary to permit, under specified
circumstances, the recapture of certain bonus credits applied to
purchase payments made with respect to certain flexible premium
variable annuity policies issued by the Companies.
DATES: Filing Date: The application was filed on March 14, 2013, and
amended and restated applications were filed on June 5, 2013 and on
October 11, 2013.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the
application will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing by writing to the Commission's
Secretary and serving Applicants with a copy of the request, personally
or by mail. Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by
5:30 p.m. on December 2, 2013, and should be accompanied by proof of
service on the Applicants, in the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers,
a certificate of service. Hearing requests should state the nature of
the requester's interest, the reason for the request, and the issues
contested. Persons may request notification of a hearing by writing to
the Secretary of the Commission.
ADDRESSES: Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. Applicants: Transamerica Life Insurance
Company and Separate Account VA B, Transamerica Financial Life
Insurance Company and Separate Account VA BNY, 4333 Edgewood Road NE.,
Cedar Rapids, IA 52499-4240; Transamerica Capital, Inc., 4600 South
Syracuse Street, Suite 1100, Denver CO 80237.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle Roberts, Senior Counsel, or
Joyce M. Pickholz, Branch Chief, Insured Investments Office, Division
of Investment Management at (202) 551-6795.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the
application. The complete application may be obtained via the
Commission's Web site by searching for the file number, or an Applicant
using the Company name box, at https://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or
by calling (202) 551-8090.
Applicants' Representations
1. Applicants seek an order under Section 6(c) of the 1940 Act to
the extent necessary to permit, under specified circumstances, the
recapture of certain bonus credits applied to purchase payments made
with respect to certain variable annuity policies, including
endorsements thereto, and certificates under group policies marketed
under the names ``Transamerica Variable Annuity Series--X Share,''
``Members Variable Annuity Series--X Share,'' and ``Partners Variable
Annuity Series--X Share'' (``Policies'') as described in the
application as well as variable annuity policies, including
endorsements thereto, and certificates under group policies issued by
the Companies in the future that are substantially similar in all
respects to the Policies (``Future Policies''). The Applicants seek to
recapture bonus credits from the Policies where the bonus credit was
applied within the preceding twelve (12) months and the owner withdraws
from or surrenders the Policy and there is no surrender charge or an
otherwise applicable surrender charge (or contingent deferred sales
load) is waived, because (i) an owner exercises his or her ``free
look'' option; (ii) a death benefit is payable; (iii) an owner
annuitizes the Policy; or (iv) an owner exercises a provision or rider
providing for waiver of the surrender charge under the Nursing Care and
Terminal Condition Withdrawal Option or the Unemployment Waiver as
defined in the Policy. The order would also apply to any other separate
accounts of the Companies or their affiliated companies that are
controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the Companies
(``Future Accounts'') that support Future Policies. Applicants also
request that the order being sought extend to any Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority (``FINRA'') member broker-dealers which may, in
the future, act as principal underwriter of such Policies or Future
Policies (``Future Underwriters'') and any successors in interest \1\
to the Applicants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Successors in interest is defined as any entity or entities
that result from a reorganization into another jurisdiction, a
change in control or a change in the type of business organization.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. TLIC is a stock life insurance company organized under the laws
of the state of Iowa. TFLIC is a stock life insurance company organized
under the laws of the state of New York. The TLIC Account is registered
under the 1940 Act as a unit investment trust (File No. 811-06032).
Interests in the TLIC Account offered through certain flexible premium
variable annuity policies have been registered under the Securities Act
of 1933 (``1933 Act'') on Form N-4 (File No. 333-185573).
3. The TFLIC Account is registered under the Act as a unit
investment trust (File No. 811-08750). Interests in the TFLIC Account
offered through certain flexible premium variable annuity policies have
been registered under the 1933 Act on Form N-4 (File No. 333-185574).
4. Each Account is comprised of subaccounts established to receive
and invest net purchase payments under the Policies (each a
``Subaccount'').
5. TCI, an affiliate of the Companies, is the principal underwriter
and the distributor of the Policies for the Accounts. TCI is registered
with the Commission as a broker-dealer under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and is a member of FINRA.
6. TLIC issues the Policies in all states except New York. TFLIC
issues the Policies only in New York. The Policies provide for
accumulation of values on a variable basis, fixed basis, or both during
the accumulation period, and may provide settlement or annuity payment
options on a variable basis, fixed basis, or both. The Policies may be
purchased on a non-qualified tax basis. The Policies may also be
purchased and used in connection with plans qualifying for favorable
federal income tax treatment.
7. The owner determines in the application or transmittal form for
a Policy how the net premium payments will be allocated among the
Subaccounts of the Accounts and any available guaranteed period options
or dollar cost averaging options of the fixed account. The policy value
will vary with the investment performance of the Subaccounts selected,
and the owner bears the entire risk for amounts allocated to an
Account.
8. For each premium payment an owner makes, the Companies may add a
bonus credit equal to a percentage of the premium payment to the
owner's policy value. The Companies do not assess a specific charge for
the bonus credit. The Companies expect to use a portion of the
mortality and expense risk charge, the administrative fee, and/or the
surrender charge to pay for the bonus credit. The credit percentage is
determined by the annuitant's age at the time of each premium payment.
Currently, the bonus credit as a percentage of each premium payment
equals 5.5% (ages 0-59), 5.0% (ages 60-69), 4.0% (ages 70-79) and 2.0%
(ages 80+). The percentage could vary based on state laws. The
Companies may vary the bonus credit percentage from premium to premium
and/or based on the annuitant's attained age at the time
[[Page 68105]]
a premium payment is made, but the bonus credit will never be less than
0.25% nor more than 7%.
9. An owner may return his or her Policy for a refund. This is
called the ``Right to Cancel Period'' or ``Free Look Right.'' An owner
will generally have 10 days to return his or her Policy depending on
the state where the Policy is issued. The Companies will not assess
surrender charges against a Policy returned during the Right to Cancel
Period.
10. Under the Policies, each Company will pay a death benefit under
certain circumstances. The Policies also offer an optional Additional
Death Distribution rider and an Additional Death Distribution+ rider
which pay an additional death benefit amount when a death benefit is
payable during the accumulation phase. A discussion of the death
benefits offered under the Policies is included in the application. The
Applicants may add other optional death benefit riders to the Policies
in the future.
11. Policy owners may select one of several optional living
benefits. The Policies offer three guaranteed lifetime withdrawal
benefits, which guarantee a minimum amount may be withdrawn annually
from the Policy for the lifetime of the annuitant, regardless of market
performance and even if these withdrawals reduce the policy value to
zero. The Policies also offer the Guaranteed Principal Solution Rider,
which provides a guaranteed minimum accumulation benefit and a
guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit. The guaranteed minimum
accumulation benefit guarantees that the policy value will equal a
specified value on a specified future date. A discussion of the
features of the Policies, including the optional living benefits, is
included in the application. The Applicants may add other living
benefit riders to the Policies in the future.
12. An owner may transfer policy values. Transfers may be limited,
or a charge may apply. Transfers and withdrawals from a guaranteed
period option of the fixed account prior to the end of the guaranteed
period are generally subject to an excess interest adjustment (except
for policies issued in New York by TFLIC). This adjustment will also be
made to amounts that an owner applies to an annuity payment option.
13. An owner may surrender a Policy or make a partial withdrawal
from the policy value during the Accumulation Period. If an owner
surrenders a Policy or takes a partial withdrawal, a Company may deduct
a surrender charge to compensate it for expenses relating to sales,
including commissions to registered representatives and other
promotional expenses. An owner generally may be permitted to withdraw
certain limited amounts free of a surrender charge. The following
charts show the surrender charges that apply to the Policies:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Surrender
charge (as a
percentage of
Number of years since premium payment date premium
payment
withdrawn)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1....................................................... 9
2....................................................... 8
3....................................................... 7
4....................................................... 6
5....................................................... 5
6....................................................... 4
7....................................................... 3
8....................................................... 2
9....................................................... 1
10+..................................................... 0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A Company will waive the surrender charges if an owner withdraws
money under the Nursing Care and Terminal Condition Withdrawal Option
or the Unemployment Waiver. Those riders are discussed in the
application.
14. In states where permitted, if an owner takes a surrender or
withdrawal under the Nursing Care and Terminal Condition Withdrawal
Option or Unemployment Waiver, the Company will reduce the amount of
the surrender value by the total bonus credits the Company credited to
an owner's policy value during the 12 months before the surrender or
withdrawal.
15. The owner may elect or change an annuity payment option during
the lifetime of the annuitant. The first annuity payment will be made
as of the annuity commencement date. The owner generally may change the
annuity commencement date, subject to specified limits. The amount of
each annuity payment under the annuity payment options will depend on
the sex (if allowed) and age of the annuitant (or annuitants) at the
time the first payment is due and the payment option.
16. The Companies deduct various fees and charges, which may
include a daily mortality and expense risk fee; a daily administrative
charge; an annual service or policy charge; premium taxes; surrender
charges (contingent deferred sales loads); and fees for optional
benefits or riders.
Applicants' Legal Analysis
1. Section 6(c) authorizes the Commission, by order upon
application, to conditionally or unconditionally grant an exemption
from any provision, rule or regulation of the 1940 Act to the extent
that the exemption is necessary or appropriate in the public interest
and consistent with the protection of investors and the purposes fairly
intended by the policy and provisions of the 1940 Act.
2. Applicants request exemptions for the Policies described in the
application, and for Future Policies that are substantially similar in
all material respects to the Policies described herein, from Sections
2(a)(32), 22(c), and 27(i)(2)(a) of the Act, and Rule 22c-1 thereunder,
pursuant to Section 6(c), to the extent necessary to recapture the
bonus credit applied to a premium payment within the preceding twelve
(12) months when the owner withdraws from or surrenders the Policy and
there is no surrender charge, or an otherwise applicable surrender
charge (or contingent deferred sales load) is waived, because: (i) An
owner exercises his or her ``free-look'' option, (ii) a death benefit
is payable, (iii) an owner annuitizes the Policy; or (iv) an owner
exercises a provision or rider providing for the waiver of the
surrender charge under the Nursing Care and Terminal Condition
Withdrawal Option or the Unemployment Waiver as defined in the Policy.
3. Section 27(i) provides that Section 27 does not apply to any
registered separate account funding variable insurance contracts, nor
to the sponsoring insurance company and principal underwriter of such
account, except as provided for in Section 27(i)(2)(A) of the 1940 Act.
Section 27(i)(2)(A), in pertinent part, makes it unlawful for any
registered separate account funding variable insurance contracts, or
for the sponsoring insurance company of such account, to sell any such
contract unless such contract is a redeemable security.
4. Section 2(a)(32) of the 1940 Act defines ``redeemable security''
as any security under the terms of which the holder, upon its
presentation to the issuer, is entitled to receive approximately his
proportionate share of the issuer's current net assets, or the cash
equivalent thereof.
5. The Applicants submit that the bonus recapture provisions in the
Policies do not deprive the owner of his or her proportionate share of
the issuer's current net assets. An owner's right to the bonus credit
will vest in full one year after a Company applies the bonus credit.
Until that time, a Company retains the right and interest in the dollar
amount of any unvested bonus credit amount. Thus, when a Company
recaptures a bonus credit, it is only retrieving its own assets, and
because an owner's interest in the bonus credit is
[[Page 68106]]
not vested, such owner would not be deprived of a proportionate share
of the Account's assets (the issuer's current net assets) in violation
of Section 2(a)(32). However, to avoid uncertainty as to full
compliance with the 1940 Act, the Applicants request an exemption from
the provisions of Sections (2)(a)(32) and 27(i)(2)(A) to the extent
deemed necessary to permit them to recapture the bonus credit under the
Policies and Future Policies.
6. Section 22(c) of the 1940 Act states that the Commission may
make rules and regulations applicable to registered investment
companies and to principal underwriters of, and dealers in, the
redeemable securities of any registered investment company to
accomplish the same ends as contemplated by Section 22(a). Rule 22c-1,
promulgated under Section 22(c) of the 1940 Act, in pertinent part,
prohibits a registered investment company issuing a redeemable security
(and a person designated in such issuer's prospectus as authorized to
consummate transactions in such security, and a principal underwriter
of, or dealer in, any such security) from selling, redeeming, or
repurchasing any such security except at a price based on the current
net asset value of such security which is next computed after receipt
of a tender of such security for redemption or of an order to purchase
or sell such security.
7. The Applicants note that a Company's addition of the bonus
credit might arguably be viewed as resulting in an owner purchasing a
redeemable security for a price below the current net asset value.
Further, a Company's recapture of the bonus credit might arguably be
viewed as resulting in the redemption of a redeemable security for a
price other than one based on the current net asset value of an
Account. The Applicants submit, however, that the bonus credit does not
violate Section 22(c) and Rule 22c-1.
8. An owner's interest in his or her policy value or in an Account
would always be offered at a price next determined on the basis of net
asset value. The granting of a bonus credit does not reflect a
reduction of that price. Instead, the Companies will purchase with
their own general account assets an interest in an Account equal to the
bonus credit. Applicants submit that because the bonus credit will be
paid out of Company assets, not Account assets, no dilution will occur
as a result of the credit.
9. The Applicants contend that the recapture of the bonus credit
does not involve either of the evils that the Commission intended to
eliminate or reduce with Rule 22c-1; namely, (1) the dilution of the
interests of other security holders and (2) speculative trading
practices that are unfair to such holders. The Applicants note that
these evils were the result of backward pricing, the practice of basing
the price of a mutual fund share on the net asset value per share
determined, as of the close of the market on the previous day. Backward
pricing allowed investors to take advantage of increases or decreases
in net asset value that were not yet reflected in the price, thereby
diluting the values of outstanding mutual fund shares.
10. The Applicants submit that the proposed recapture of the bonus
credit does not pose such threat of dilution. The bonus credit
recapture will not alter an owner's net asset value. Each Company will
determine an owner's net cash surrender value under a Policy in
accordance with Rule 22c-1 on a basis next computed after receipt of an
owner's request for surrender (likewise, the calculation of death
benefits and annuity payment amounts will be in full compliance with
the forward pricing requirement of Rule 22c-1). The amount recaptured
will equal the amount of the bonus credit that a Company paid out of
its general account assets. Although an owner will retain any
investment gain attributable to the bonus credit, a Company will
determine the amount of such gain on the basis of the current net asset
value of the Subaccount. Thus, no dilution will occur upon the
recapture of the bonus credit.
11. The Applicants further submit that the other harm that Rule
22c-1 was designed to address, speculative trading practices calculated
to take advantage of backward pricing, will not occur as a result of a
Company's recapture of the bonus credit.
12. For the reasons set forth above, Applicants submit that Rule
22c-1 and Section 22(c) should have no application to the bonus credit
as neither of the harms that Rule 22c-1 was designed to address are
found in the recapture of the bonus credit. However, to avoid
uncertainty as to full compliance with the Act, the Applicants request
an exemption from the provisions of Section 22(c) and Rule 22c-1 to the
extent deemed necessary to permit them to recapture the bonus credit
under the Policies and Future Policies.
13. The Applicants contend that a Company's recapture of the bonus
credit is designed to prevent anti-selection against that Company. The
risk of anti-selection would be that an owner could make significant
premium payments into the Policy solely in order to receive a quick
profit from the credit. By recapturing a bonus credit, a Company
protects itself against the risk that an owner will make such large
premium payments, receive a bonus credit, and then withdraw his or her
money from the Policy under one of the circumstances described herein.
Furthermore, a Company's recapture of the bonus credit is designed to
protect the Company against the risk that owners will not hold the
Policy for a sufficient period of time for the Company to recover its
costs related to providing the bonus credit.
14. The Applicants also contend that it would be inherently unfair
to allow an owner exercising the free-look privilege in a Policy to
retain the bonus credit when returning the Policy for a refund after a
period of only a few days (usually 10 or less). If a Company could not
recapture the bonus credit, individuals might purchase a Policy with no
intention of retaining it, and simply return it for a quick profit. By
recapturing the bonus credit, a Company will prevent such individuals
from doing so.
15. Applicants seek relief requested herein not only for themselves
with respect to the Policies, but also with respect to Future Accounts
or Future Policies. In addition, Applicants seek relief herein with
respect to Future Underwriters (i.e., a class consisting of FINRA
member broker-dealers which may in the future act as principal
underwriter of the Policies and Future Policies). Applicants represent
that the terms of the relief requested with respect to any Future
Underwriters are consistent with the standards set forth in section
6(c) of the 1940 Act and Commission precedent.
16. Applicants represent that the terms of the relief requested
with respect to any Policies or Future Policies issued by the Companies
and funded by the Accounts or Future Accounts are consistent with the
standards set forth in Section 6(c) of the 1940 Act and Commission
precedent. Applicants state that, without the requested class relief,
exemptive relief for any Future Account, Future Policy or Future
Underwriter would have to be requested and obtained separately.
Applicants assert that these additional requests for exemptive relief
would present no issues under the 1940 Act not already addressed
herein. Applicants state that if the Applicants were to repeatedly seek
exemptive relief with respect to the same issues addressed herein,
investors would not receive additional protection or benefit, and
investors and the Applicants could be disadvantaged by increased costs
[[Page 68107]]
from preparing such additional requests for relief. Applicants argue
that the requested class relief is appropriate in the public interest
because the relief will promote competitiveness in the variable annuity
market by eliminating the need for the Companies or their affiliates to
file redundant exemptive applications, thereby reducing administrative
expenses and maximizing efficient use of resources. Applicants submit
that elimination of the delay and the expense of repeatedly seeking
exemptive relief would enhance each Applicant's ability to effectively
take advantage of business opportunities as such opportunities arise.
17. All entities that currently intend to rely on the requested
order are named as Applicants. Any entity that relies upon the
requested order in the future will comply with the terms and conditions
contained in this Application.
Conclusion
For the reasons summarized above, Applicants represent that: the
requested exemptions are necessary and appropriate in the public
interest and consistent with the protection of investors and the
purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the 1940 Act;
and their request for class exemptions is necessary or appropriate in
the public interest and consistent with the protection of investors and
the purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the 1940
Act.
For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
pursuant to delegated authority.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-27039 Filed 11-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P