Proposed Exemptions From Certain Prohibited Transaction Restrictions, 66769-66778 [2013-26506]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 6, 2013 / Notices
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Agency: DOL–BLS.
Title of Collection: Census of Fatal
Occupational Injuries.
OMB Control Number: 1220–0133.
Affected Public: Individuals or
Households; State Local, and Tribal
Governments; Federal Government; and
Private Sector—businesses or other forprofits, farms, and not-for-profit
institutions.
Total Estimated Number of
Respondents: 1,878.
Total Estimated Number of
Responses: 18,748.
Total Estimated Annual Burden
Hours: 3,469.
Total Estimated Annual Other Costs
Burden: $0.
Dated: October 31, 2013.
Michel Smyth,
Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013–26496 Filed 11–5–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–24–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
Proposed Exemptions From Certain
Prohibited Transaction Restrictions
Employee Benefits Security
Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice of proposed exemptions.
AGENCY:
This document contains
notices of pendency before the
Department of Labor (the Department) of
proposed exemptions from certain of the
prohibited transaction restrictions of the
Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974 (ERISA or the Act) and/or
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the
Code). This notice includes the
following proposed exemptions:
D–11729, Bank of America Corporation;
and L–11760, Intel Corporation.
DATES: All interested persons are invited
to submit written comments or requests
for a hearing on the pending
exemptions, unless otherwise stated in
the Notice of Proposed Exemption,
within 45 days from the date of
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:25 Nov 05, 2013
Jkt 232001
publication of this Federal Register
Notice.
ADDRESSES: Comments and requests for
a hearing should state: (1) The name,
address, and telephone number of the
person making the comment or request,
and (2) the nature of the person’s
interest in the exemption and the
manner in which the person would be
adversely affected by the exemption. A
request for a hearing must also state the
issues to be addressed and include a
general description of the evidence to be
presented at the hearing. All written
comments and requests for a hearing (at
least three copies) should be sent to the
Employee Benefits Security
Administration (EBSA), Office of
Exemption Determinations, Room
N–5700, U.S. Department of Labor, 200
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20210. Attention: Application No.,
stated in each Notice of Proposed
Exemption. Interested persons are also
invited to submit comments and/or
hearing requests to EBSA via email or
FAX. Any such comments or requests
should be sent either by email to:
moffitt.betty@dol.gov, or by FAX to
(202) 219–0204 by the end of the
scheduled comment period. The
applications for exemption and the
comments received will be available for
public inspection in the Public
Documents Room of the Employee
Benefits Security Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, Room N–1513,
200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20210.
Warning: All comments will be made
available to the public. Do not include
any personally identifiable information
(such as Social Security number, name,
address, or other contact information) or
confidential business information that
you do not want publicly disclosed. All
comments may be posted on the Internet
and can be retrieved by most Internet
search engines.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Notice to Interested Persons
Notice of the proposed exemptions
will be provided to all interested
persons in the manner agreed upon by
the applicant and the Department
within 15 days of the date of publication
in the Federal Register. Such notice
shall include a copy of the notice of
proposed exemption as published in the
Federal Register and shall inform
interested persons of their right to
comment and to request a hearing
(where appropriate).
The proposed exemptions were
requested in applications filed pursuant
to section 408(a) of the Act and/or
section 4975(c)(2) of the Code, and in
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66769
accordance with procedures set forth in
29 CFR Part 2570, Subpart B (76 FR
66637, 66644, October 27, 2011).1
Effective December 31, 1978, section
102 of Reorganization Plan No. 4 of
1978, 5 U.S.C. App. 1 (1996), transferred
the authority of the Secretary of the
Treasury to issue exemptions of the type
requested to the Secretary of Labor.
Therefore, these notices of proposed
exemption are issued solely by the
Department.
The applications contain
representations with regard to the
proposed exemptions which are
summarized below. Interested persons
are referred to the applications on file
with the Department for a complete
statement of the facts and
representations.
Bank of America Corporation Located
in Charlotte, NC
[Application No. D–11729]
Proposed Exemption
The Department is considering
granting an exemption under the
authority of ERISA section 408(a) and
Code section 4975(c)(2) in accordance
with the procedures set forth in 29 CFR
Part 2570, subpart B (76 FR 66637,
66644, October 27, 2011).
Section I: Covered Transactions
If this proposed exemption is granted,
the restrictions of ERISA sections
406(a)(1)(D) and 406(b) and the
sanctions resulting from the application
of Code section 4975 (including the loss
of exemption 2 by reason of Code
sections 4975(c)(1)(D), (E) and (F)) shall
not apply to the receipt of Relationship
Benefits by an individual for whose
benefit a Covered Plan is established or
maintained, or by his or her Family
Members, from BAC pursuant to an
arrangement in which the Account
Value of, or the Fees incurred for
services provided to, the Covered Plan
is taken into account for purposes of
determining eligibility to receive such
Relationship Benefits, provided that
each condition of Section II of this
proposed exemption is satisfied.
1 The Department has considered exemption
applications received prior to December 27, 2011
under the exemption procedures set forth in 29 CFR
Part 2570, Subpart B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August
10, 1990).
2 Pursuant to Code section 408(e)(2)(A)(for an
individual retirement account or individual
retirement annuity); Code section 530(e) (for a
Coverdell education savings account); Code section
220(e)(2) (for an Archer medical savings account);
or Code section 223(e)(2) (for a health savings
account).
E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM
06NON1
66770
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 6, 2013 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Section II: Conditions
Section III: Definitions
(a) The Covered Plan whose Account
Value, or whose Fees paid, are taken
into account for purposes of
determining eligibility to receive
Relationship Benefits under the
arrangement must be established and
maintained for the exclusive benefit of
the participant covered under the
Covered Plan, his or her spouse, or their
beneficiaries.
(b) The Relationship Benefits offered
under the arrangement must be of a type
that a Qualified Affiliate could offer
consistent with all applicable federal
and state banking laws and all
applicable federal and state laws
regulating Broker-Dealers.
(c) Where Account Values are taken
into account for purposes of
determining eligibility to receive
benefits under the arrangement, the
Account Values of Covered Plan
accounts shall be treated as favorably,
for purposes of satisfying such
eligibility requirements, as the Account
Values of other types of customer
accounts.
(d) Where levels of Fees incurred are
taken into account for purposes of
determining eligibility to receive
benefits under the arrangement, the
levels of Fees incurred by Covered Plan
accounts shall be treated as favorably,
for purposes of satisfying such
eligibility requirements, as the levels of
Fees incurred by other types of
customer accounts.
(e) The Relationship Benefits offered
under the arrangement must be
provided by a Qualified Affiliate in the
ordinary course of its business as a Bank
or Broker-Dealer to customers who
qualify for such benefits, but who do not
maintain Covered Plans with a
Qualified Affiliate.
(f) The combined total of fees for the
provision of services to a Covered Plan
is not in excess of reasonable
compensation within the meaning of
ERISA section 408(b)(2) and Code
section 4975(d)(2).
(g) The investment performance of the
investments made by the Covered Plan
is no less favorable than the investment
performance of identical investments
that could have been made at the same
time by a customer of BAC who is not
eligible for (or who does not receive)
Relationship Benefits.
(h) The Relationship Benefits offered
under the arrangement to the Covered
Plan customer must be the same as are
offered to non-Covered Plan customers
of Qualified Affiliates having the same
aggregate Account Value or the same
amount of Fees generated.
The following definitions apply to
this proposed exemption:
(a) The term ‘‘Account Value’’ means
investments in cash or securities held in
the account for which market quotations
are readily available. For purposes of
the exemption, the term ‘‘cash’’ includes
savings accounts that are insured by a
federal deposit insurance agency and
constitute deposits as that term is
defined in 29 CFR 2550.408b–4(c)(3).
The term ‘‘Account Value’’ does not
include investments that are offered by
BAC (or a Qualified Affiliate)
exclusively to Covered Plans.
(b) The term ‘‘affiliate’’ includes any
person directly or indirectly controlling,
controlled by, or under common control
with Bank of America Corporation.
(c) The term ‘‘Bank’’ means a bank
described in Code section 408(n).
(d) The term ‘‘BAC’’ means Bank of
America Corporation and any of its
affiliates.
(e) The term ‘‘Broker-Dealer’’ means a
broker-dealer registered under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
(f) The term ‘‘control’’ means the
power to exercise a controlling
influence over the management or
policies of a person other than an
individual.
(g) The term ‘‘Covered Plan’’ means
an IRA or other savings account
described in section III(j) of this
proposed exemption or a Keogh Plan
described in section III(k) of this
proposed exemption that is established
with BAC as trustee or custodian.
(h) The term ‘‘Family Members’’
means beneficiaries of the individual for
whose benefit the Covered Plan is
established or maintained, who would
be members of the family as that term
is defined in Code section 4975(e)(6), or
a brother, a sister, or a spouse of a
brother or sister.
(i) The term ‘‘Fees’’ means
commissions and other fees received by
a Broker-Dealer from the Covered Plan
for the provision of services, including
but not limited to: Brokerage
commissions, investment management
fees, investment advisory fees, custodial
fees, and administrative fees.
(j) The term ‘‘IRA’’ means an
individual retirement account described
in Code section 408(a), an individual
retirement annuity described in Code
section 408(b), a Coverdell education
savings account described in Code
section 530, an Archer MSA described
in Code section 220(d), or a health
savings account described in Code
section 223(d). For purposes of this
proposed exemption, the term ‘‘IRA’’
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:25 Nov 05, 2013
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
does not include an employee benefit
plan covered by Title I of ERISA, except
for a Simplified Employee Pension
(SEP) described in Code section 408(k)
and a Simple Retirement Account
described in Code section 408(p) that
provides participants with the
unrestricted authority to transfer their
balances to IRAs or Simple Retirement
Accounts sponsored by different
financial institutions.
(k) The term ‘‘Keogh Plan’’ means a
pension, profit-sharing, or stock bonus
plan qualified under Code section
401(a) and exempt from taxation under
Code section 501(a) under which some
or all of the participants are employees
described in Code section 401(c). For
purposes of this proposed exemption,
the term ‘‘Keogh Plan’’ does not include
an employee benefit plan covered by
Title I of ERISA.
(l) The term ‘‘Qualified Affiliate’’
means any person directly or indirectly
controlling, controlled by, or under
common control with BAC that is a
Bank or Broker-Dealer.
(m) The term ‘‘Relationship Benefits’’
means reduced or no cost financial
products and services, including
premium rates of account or investment
interest, discounted rates of interest on
loans, reductions or waivers of
otherwise applicable fees and charges,
and/or differentiated servicing.
Summary of Facts and Representations
1. Bank of America Corporation (the
Applicant) is a bank holding company
and a financial holding company under
the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999
(GLBA). As of December 31, 2011, Bank
of America Corporation and its
subsidiaries had total consolidated
assets of approximately $2.1 trillion.
The consumer and corporate banking
business of Bank of America
Corporation and its affiliates (together,
BAC) is conducted primarily through
Bank of America, National Association
(BANA). BANA is a national franchise
that includes branch and electronic
banking, consumer lending services,
and credit and debit card services.
BAC’s brokerage business, conducted
primarily through Merrill Lynch, Pierce,
Fenner & Smith Incorporated (Merrill
Lynch), provides investment services,
securities trading, research, and
brokerage services to consumer and
corporate customers. Merrill Lynch is a
retail brokerage firm with approximately
17,000 financial advisors and offices
located in all 50 states and the District
of Columbia. Together, BANA and
Merrill Lynch serve approximately 57
million consumer and small business
relationships and client accounts with
more than $2.2 trillion in net assets. In
E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM
06NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 6, 2013 / Notices
the ordinary course of its business, BAC
(including BANA and Merrill Lynch)
provide a range of financial products
and services to individuals including
individual retirement accounts (IRAs)
described in Code section 408(a),
individual retirement annuities
described in Code section 408(b),
Coverdell education savings accounts
described in Code section 530, Archer
MSAs described in Code section 220(d),
health savings accounts described in
Code section 223(d) and Keogh plans
(i.e., pension, profit-sharing, or stock
bonus plans qualified under Code
section 401(a) and exempt from taxation
under Code section 501(a) under which
some or all of the participants are
employees described in Code section
401(c)) not covered by Title I of ERISA
(each, a ‘‘Covered Plan’’ as defined in
the proposed exemption and
collectively, the ‘‘Covered Plans’’). For
purposes of this proposed exemption,
the term ‘‘Covered Plan’’ includes
Simplified Employee Pensions (SEP)
described in Code section 408(k) and
Simple Retirement Accounts described
in Code section 408(p) that provide
participants with the unrestricted
authority to transfer their balances to
IRAs or Simple Retirement Accounts
sponsored by different financial
institutions.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Reduced or No Cost Services in
Prohibited Transaction Exemptions
93–33 and 97–11
2. The Applicant wishes to offer
relationship banking and brokerage
benefits that are similar to the reduced
or no cost services contemplated by
Prohibited Transaction Exemptions
(PTEs) 93–33 and 97–11. PTE 93–33 3
permits an individual for whose benefit
an IRA or Keogh Plan is established or
maintained, or his or her family
members, to receive services at reduced
or no cost from a bank under an
arrangement in which the account
balance of the IRA or Keogh Plan is
considered when determining eligibility
to receive such services. PTE 93–33
permits banks to offer their customers
only those services allowed under
applicable federal and state banking
laws.4 When an affiliate of the bank
3 58 FR 31053 (May 28, 1993), as amended at 59
FR 22686 (May 2, 1994), and as amended at 64 FR
11044 (March 8, 1999).
4 In the notice of proposed exemption for PTE 93–
2 (PTE 93–33 subsequently amended PTE 93–2), the
following examples of relationship banking services
were listed: free checking services, discounted safe
deposit box rents, or free loan closing costs. 56 FR
8365, 8366 (February 28, 1991). In addition, the
Department notes that a bank may offer other
services or benefits to customers as part of its
relationship banking program. For example, under
PTE 93–33 a bank may offer its relationship banking
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:25 Nov 05, 2013
Jkt 232001
offers the service, it must be a type of
service that the bank can offer its own
customers.
3. PTE 97–11 5 permits an individual
for whose benefit an IRA or Keogh Plan
is established or maintained, or his or
her family members, to receive services
at reduced or no cost from a brokerdealer registered under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 under an
arrangement in which the account value
or the fees incurred for services
provided to the IRA or Keogh Plan is
considered when determining eligibility
to receive such services. PTE 97–11
limits the services that broker-dealers
may offer under a relationship brokerage
program to services that are permitted
under federal and state laws regulating
broker-dealers.6 Furthermore, when an
affiliate of the broker-dealer offers the
services, the services must be a type that
the broker-dealer can offer its own
customers.
4. PTEs 93–33 and 97–11 provide
relief from the restrictions of ERISA
sections 406(a)(1)(D) and 406(b) and the
sanctions resulting from the application
of Code section 4975, including the loss
of exemption of an individual
retirement account under Code section
408(e)(2) by reason of Code section
4975(c)(1)(D), (E) and (F), for
individuals for whose benefit an IRA or
Keogh Plan is established or
maintained.
5. The Applicant states that BAC’s
decision to offer relationship banking
and brokerage benefits reflects the
important changes that have occurred in
the financial industry since PTEs 93–33
and 97–11 were issued. In this regard,
the Applicant notes that PTEs 93–33
and 97–11 were granted by the
Department prior to the enactment of
the GLBA. The Applicant represents
that the GLBA altered the U.S. legal and
regulatory framework governing the
operations of U.S. bank holding
customers a higher interest rate on their
investments, provided the conditions of the
exemption are met.
5 62 FR 5855 (February 7, 1997), as amended at
64 FR 11042 (March 8, 1999), and as amended at
67 FR 76425 (December 12, 2002).
6 In the notice of proposed exemption for PTE 97–
11, the following examples of relationship
brokerage services were listed: financial planning
services, direct deposit/debit and automatic fund
transfer privileges, enhanced account statements,
toll-free access to client service centers, check
writing privileges, debit/credit cards, special
newsletters, and reduced brokerage and asset
management fees. 61 FR 39996, 39997 (July 31,
1996). In addition, the Department notes that a
broker-dealer may offer its customers additional
services and benefits as part of its relationship
brokerage program. For example, under PTE 97–11,
a broker-dealer may offer its relationship brokerage
customers a higher interest rate on their
investments, provided the conditions of the
exemption are met.
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66771
companies such as Bank of America
Corporation. The GLBA permits bank
holding companies that qualify as
‘‘financial holding companies’’—
including the Applicant—to affiliate
broadly with various types of financial
services firms, including full service
broker-dealers. Furthermore, the
enactment of the GLBA greatly
facilitated financial services integration
in the United States and growth of bankaffiliated securities operations.
6. According to the Applicant,
another significant U.S. regulatory
development occurred in 1995 when the
U.S. Federal Reserve Board (FRB)
adopted a rule regarding inter-affiliate
‘‘combined-balance discount service
programs’’ offered to individual
customers of banks and bank affiliates.
In particular, the rule established a safe
harbor from the statutory restrictions on
bank tying arrangements so that banks
have greater flexibility to package
products with their affiliates. The
Applicant represents that the rule
validated the ability of banks and their
broker-dealer affiliates to offer
combined-balance discount programs
(that meet the safe harbor requirements)
to their customers. Furthermore, the
Applicant represents that in 1997, the
FRB reaffirmed the safe harbor when it
re-wrote its Regulation Y, which
includes a section dealing with antitying restrictions. The Applicant
represents that the relationship banking
and brokerage benefits described in this
proposed exemption meet the safe
harbor.
7. In 2008, the Department granted an
individual exemption, PTE 2008–02,7 to
Citigroup Inc. (Citigroup) that provides
relief similar to PTEs 93–33 and 97–11.
Under the exemption, individuals for
whose benefit an IRA or Keogh Plan is
established or maintained, and their
family members, can receive both
banking and brokerage services at
reduced or no cost under an
arrangement in which the account value
of, or the fees incurred for services
provided to, the IRA or Keogh Plan is
taken into account for purposes of
determining eligibility to receive such
services. As part of the arrangement,
Citigroup contemplated providing
services such as: Reductions or waivers
of fees for services such as checking,
ATM, investment advisory and account
opening or maintenance fees; preferred
lending rates; premium interest
crediting rates; credit or debit cards
providing services such as enhanced
mileage accumulation and reward point
features; and the provision of
investment information and seminars
7 73
E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM
FR 3280 (January 17, 2008).
06NON1
66772
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 6, 2013 / Notices
that are available on an invitation-only
basis.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Proposed Transactions
8. In 2009, the Applicant acquired
Merrill Lynch, which operates a
significant retail securities business. As
a result, BAC developed programs that
link retail banking services with retail
brokerage services. Under these
programs, the Applicant’s affiliates are
able to consider a customer’s combined
balance maintained with the
Applicants’s affiliates to determine the
customer’s eligibility to receive various
benefits including bank and brokerdealer products and services at reduced
or no cost. The Applicant does not
believe these arrangements clearly fall
within the relief provided by PTEs 93–
33 and 97–11. Therefore, the Applicant
requests an exemption to permit the
receipt of certain benefits by an
individual for whose benefit a Covered
Plan is established or maintained, or his
or her family members, from BAC,
pursuant to an arrangement in which
the account value of or the fees incurred
for services provided to the Covered
Plan, is taken into account for purposes
of determining eligibility to receive such
products and services. The Applicant
represents that these products and
services (Relationship Benefits) are
defined as reduced or no cost financial
products and services, including
premium rates of account or investment
interest, discounted rates of interest on
loans, reductions or waivers of
otherwise applicable fees and charges,
and/or differentiated servicing. More
specifically, the Relationship Benefits
will include: (1) Higher interest rates on
products such as checking accounts,
savings accounts and certificates of
deposit; (2) services with reduced cost
or value added features such as
reductions or waivers of fees on
checking accounts and ATM access,
reduced or waived investment advisory
and account opening or maintenance
fees, reduced or waived securities
trading commissions, and preferred
lending rates; (3) credit or debit cards
that provide services such as enhanced
mileage accumulation and reward
points features; (4) access to enhanced
customer support services; and/or (5)
investment information and seminars
that are available on an invitation-only
basis. Differentiated servicing refers to
the provision of an enhanced level of
customer service relative to that which
would otherwise be provided, such as
reduced customer service wait times,
access to specialized customer support
representatives, specialized newsletters,
and similar items.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:25 Nov 05, 2013
Jkt 232001
9. The Applicant offers the following
example of a Relationship Benefits
program that could be offered under the
proposed exemption, if granted:
An individual client of BAC is the
beneficial owner of an IRA with assets of
$25,000 in a 12-month certificate of deposit,
and BAC is the IRA custodian. The client
also maintains a savings account at BANA
with a balance of $10,000; a BANA checking
account with a balance of $5,000; and a
brokerage account at Merrill Lynch with a
balance of $20,000. BAC makes a
Relationship Benefits program available to
clients that maintain aggregate balances of
$50,000 or more in accounts eligible to
participate in the program. Under the
Relationship Benefits program, certain
account fees that might otherwise apply are
waived for the eligible accounts of qualifying
clients, and higher interest rates are paid on
certain deposit accounts. Without the
exemption proposed herein, the client’s IRA
is not an eligible account, so the client fails
to qualify for the program. Consequently, the
client’s checking account may be charged a
$10 fee for overdraft protection transfers, a
$30 fee for stop payment requests, and/or a
$3 fee for receiving images of paid checks.
Additionally, the client’s brokerage account
will not be eligible for the 30 free trades per
month that would otherwise be available
through the program. Finally, if the client’s
IRA is not eligible to participate, the interest
rate paid on the savings account will be
0.15% annual percentage yield (APY) rather
than 0.20% APY, and the interest rate paid
on the IRA’s 12-month certificate of deposit
will be 0.35% APY rather than 0.45% APY.
If the proposed exemption is granted, the
client will qualify for program participation
due to the IRA’s inclusion as an eligible
account. Therefore, the client will receive
more favorable interest rates and waived fees
under the program.
Statutory Findings
10. The Applicant represents that the
statutory criteria needed to grant an
exemption under ERISA section 408(a)
and Code section 4975(c)(2) will be
satisfied. First, the proposed exemption
is administratively feasible because: (1)
The conditions and relief of the
requested exemption are comparable to
those described in PTEs 93–33, 97–11,
and 2008–02; and (2) the requested
exemption will not require continued
monitoring or other involvement on
behalf of the Department. Second, the
Applicant claims that the proposed
exemption is in the interest of the
Covered Plans because the plans will
benefit from access to better products
and services available through the
Relationship Benefits program. Finally,
the Applicant claims that the proposed
exemption is protective of the rights of
the Covered Plan participants and
beneficiaries because:
(a) The Covered Plan whose account
value, or whose fees paid, are taken into
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
account for purposes of determining
eligibility to receive Relationship
Benefits under the arrangement will be
established and maintained for the
exclusive benefit of the participant
covered under the Covered Plan, his or
her spouse, or their beneficiaries.
(b) The Relationship Benefits offered
under the arrangement will be of a type
that a qualified affiliate could offer
consistent with all applicable federal
and state banking laws and all
applicable federal and state laws
regulating broker-dealers.
(c) Where account values are taken
into account for purposes of
determining eligibility to receive
benefits under the arrangement, the
account values of Covered Plan
accounts will be treated as favorably, for
purposes of satisfying such eligibility
requirements, as the account values of
other types of customer accounts.
(d) Where levels of fees incurred are
taken into account for purposes of
determining eligibility to receive
benefits under the arrangement, the
levels of fees incurred by Covered Plan
accounts will be treated as favorably for
purposes of satisfying such eligibility
requirements, as the levels of fees
incurred by other types of customer
accounts.
(e) The Relationship Benefits offered
under the arrangement will be provided
by a BAC affiliate in the ordinary course
of its business as a bank or broker-dealer
to customers who qualify for such
benefits, but who do not maintain
Covered Plans with a BAC affiliate.
(f) The combined total of fees for the
provision of services to a Covered Plan
will not be in excess of reasonable
compensation within the meaning of
ERISA section 408(b)(2) and Code
section 4975(d)(2).
(g) The investment performance of the
investments made by the Covered Plan
will be no less favorable than the
investment performance of identical
investments that could have been made
at the same time by a customer of BAC
who is not eligible for (or who does not
receive) Relationship Benefits.
(h) The Relationship Benefits offered
under the arrangement to the Covered
Plan customer will be the same as are
offered to non-Covered Plan customers
of BAC affiliates having the same
aggregate account value or the same
amount of fees generated.
Notice to Interested Persons
The Applicant represents that since
the number of interested persons is very
large, it will post notice of this proposed
exemption on its principal consumer
banking and brokerage Web sites in
addition to publication of this notice in
E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM
06NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 6, 2013 / Notices
the Federal Register. The Department
must receive written comments and/or
requests for a public hearing no later
than 45 days from the date this notice
is published in the Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Erin Hesse, U.S. Department of Labor,
telephone (202) 693–8546. (This is not
a toll-free number.)
Intel Corporation (Intel or the
Applicant) Located in Santa Clara, CA
[Application No. L–11760]
Proposed Exemption
The Department is considering
granting an exemption under the
authority of section 408(a) of the Act
and in accordance with the procedures
set forth in 29 CFR part 2570, Subpart
B (76 FR 66637, 66644, October 27,
2011).
Section I. Transactions
If the proposed exemption is granted,
the restrictions of sections 406(a)(1)(D)
and 406(b) of the Act shall not apply to:
(a) The reinsurance of risks and the
receipt of premiums therefrom by
Technology Assurance Limited (TAL),
an affiliate of Intel, as the term
‘‘affiliate’’ is defined in Section III(a)
below, in connection with basic and
supplemental group term life insurance
sold by the Minnesota Life Insurance
Company (MN Life), or any successor
insurance company which is unrelated
to Intel (the Fronting Insurer), to the
Intel Group Life Insurance Plan (the Life
Plan); and
(b) The reinsurance of risks and the
receipt of premiums therefrom by TAL,
in connection with basic and
supplemental accidental death and
dismemberment (AD&D) insurance sold
by the Fronting Insurer to the Intel
Group Accidental Death and
Dismemberment Plan (the AD&D Plan); 8
provided the conditions set forth in
Section II, below, are satisfied.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Section II. Conditions
(a) TAL—
(1) Is a party in interest with respect
to the Plans by reason of a stock or
partnership affiliation with Intel that is
described in section 3(14)(E) or 3(14)(G)
of the Act;
(2) Is licensed to sell insurance or
conduct reinsurance operations in at
least one ‘‘State,’’ as defined in section
3(10) of the Act;
(3) Has obtained a Certificate of
Authority from the Hawaii Department
of Insurance (HIDOI), which has neither
been revoked nor suspended;
8 The AD&D Plan and the Life Plan are together
referred to herein as the ‘‘Plans.’’
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:25 Nov 05, 2013
Jkt 232001
(4)(A) Will undergo an examination
by an independent certified public
accountant for its last completed taxable
year immediately prior to the taxable
year of the reinsurance transaction
covered by this proposed exemption, if
granted; or
(B) Has undergone a financial
examination by the HIDOI within five
(5) years prior to the end of the year
preceding the year in which such
reinsurance transaction has occurred;
and
(5) Is licensed to conduct reinsurance
transactions by Hawaii, whose law
requires that an actuarial review of
reserves be conducted annually by an
independent firm of actuaries and
reported to the appropriate regulatory
authority.
(b) The Plans pay no more than
adequate consideration for the
insurance contracts.
(c) No commissions are paid by the
Plans with respect to the direct sale of
such contracts or the reinsurance
thereof.
(d) In the initial year of every
reinsurance contract involving TAL and
a Fronting Insurer, there is an
immediate and objectively determined
benefit to participants and beneficiaries
of the Plans in the form of increased
benefits, and such benefits continue in
all subsequent years of each such
contract of reinsurance and in every
renewal of each such contract, and will
at least approximate the increase in
benefits that will be effective as of the
publication of the final exemption in the
Federal Register, as described in this
Notice of Proposed Exemption (the
Notice).
(e) In the initial year and in
subsequent years of coverage provided
by a Fronting Insurer, the formula used
by the Fronting Insurer to calculate
premiums will be similar to formulae
used by other insurers providing
comparable coverage under similar
programs. Furthermore, the premium
charge calculated in accordance with
the formula will be reasonable and will
be comparable to the premium charged
by the Fronting Insurer and its
competitors with the same or a better
rating providing the same coverage
under comparable programs.
(f) The Fronting Insurer has a
financial strength rating of ‘‘A’’ or better
from A. M. Best Company (A. M. Best).
The reinsurance arrangement between
the Fronting Insurer and TAL will be
indemnity insurance only, (i.e., the
Fronting Insurer will not be relieved of
liability to the Plans should TAL be
unable or unwilling to cover any
liability arising from the reinsurance
arrangement).
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66773
(g) The Plans retain an independent,
qualified fiduciary (the I/F) or successor
to such fiduciary, as defined in Section
III(c), below, to analyze the transactions
and to render an opinion that the
requirements of Section II(a) through (f)
and (h) of this proposed exemption have
been satisfied.
(h) Participants and beneficiaries in
the Plans will receive in subsequent
years of every contract of reinsurance
involving TAL and the Fronting Insurer
no less than the immediate and
objectively determined increased
benefits such participants and
beneficiaries received in the initial year
of each such contract involving TAL
and the Fronting Insurer.
(i) The I/F will: Monitor the
transactions proposed herein on behalf
of the Plans on a continuing basis to
ensure such transactions remain in the
interest of the Plans; take all appropriate
actions to safeguard the interests of the
Plans; and enforce compliance with all
conditions and obligations imposed on
any party dealing with the Plans.
(j) In connection with the provision to
participants in the Plans of the
insurance coverage provided by the
Fronting Insurer which is reinsured by
TAL, the I/F will review all contracts
(and any renewal of such contracts) of
the reinsurance of risks and the receipt
of premiums therefrom by TAL and
must determine that the requirements of
this exemption, if granted, and the terms
of the increased benefits continue to be
satisfied.
Section III. Definitions
(a) The term ‘‘affiliate’’ of a person
includes any person directly or
indirectly, through one or more
intermediaries, controlling, controlled
by, or under common control with the
person;
(b) The term ‘‘control’’ means the
power to exercise a controlling
influence over the management or
policies of a person other than an
individual.
(c) The term ‘‘I/F’’ describes a person,
or a successor to such person, who is
not Intel or TAL or an affiliate of either
entity; and:
(1) Does not have an ownership
interest in Intel, in TAL, or in an
affiliate of either;
(2) Is not a fiduciary with respect to
the Plans prior to its appointment to
serve as the I/F;
(3) Has acknowledged in writing
acceptance of fiduciary responsibility
and has agreed not to participate in any
decision with respect to any transaction
in which it has an interest that might
affect its best judgment as a fiduciary;
and
E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM
06NON1
66774
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 6, 2013 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
(4) Has appropriate training,
experience, and facilities to act on
behalf of the Plans regarding the subject
transactions in accordance with the
fiduciary duties and responsibilities
prescribed by the Act.
For purposes of this definition of an
‘‘I/F,’’ no organization or individual
may serve as an I/F for any fiscal year
if the gross income received by such
organization or individual (or
partnership or corporation of which
such individual is an officer, director, or
10 percent or more partner or
shareholder) for that fiscal year exceeds
two percent (2%) of that organization’s
or individual’s annual gross income
from all sources for the prior fiscal year
from Intel or from TAL, or from an
affiliate of either (including amounts
received for services as I/F under any
prohibited transaction exemption
granted by the Department).
In addition, no organization or
individual who is an I/F, and no
partnership or corporation of which
such organization or individual is an
officer, director, or 10 percent (10%) or
more partner or shareholder, may
acquire any property from, sell any
property to, or borrow any funds from
Intel or from TAL, or from any affiliate
of either during the period that such
organization or individual serves as an
I/F, and continuing for a period of six
(6) months after such organization or
individual ceases to be the I/F, or
negotiates any such transaction during
the period that such organization or
individual serves as the I/F.
In the event a successor I/F is
appointed to represent the interests of
the Plans with respect to the subject
transactions, there may be no lapse in
time between the resignation or
termination of the former I/F and the
appointment of the successor I/F.
Summary of Facts and Representations
1. Intel, which is headquartered in
Santa Clara, California, develops
advanced integrated digital technology
products (primarily integrated circuits)
for industries such as computing and
communications. Intel also designs and
manufactures computing and
communications components, wireless
and wired connectivity products, as
well as platforms that incorporate these
components.
For the fiscal year ending December
31, 2012, Intel earned revenue of $53.3
billion and net income of $11.0 billion.
Intel reported a global employee
workforce of 101,671 as of December 31,
2011 (with approximately 55,500
employees in the United States). Intel is
a party in interest with respect to the
Plans, pursuant to section 3(14)(C) of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:25 Nov 05, 2013
Jkt 232001
the Act, as an employer whose
employees are covered by the Plans.
2. TAL is an insurance company that
is wholly owned by Intel. TAL was
originally incorporated in Hawaii on
August 5, 2004, and subsequently
licensed to commence business on
September 1, 2004, for the purpose of
reinsuring property and casualty risks of
Intel. TAL is a party in interest with
respect to the Plans pursuant to section
3(14)(G) of the Act because it is a
corporation of which 50 percent (50%)
or more of the combined voting power
of all classes of stock entitled to vote is
owned directly or indirectly held by
Intel, an employer any of whose
employees are covered by the Plans, as
described in section 3(14)(C) of the Act.
3. TAL writes Intel’s Terrorism Risk
Insurance Act coverage to Intel and its
subsidiaries. For the period and year-todate ended December 31, 2012, TAL
reported total assets of $9,570,558, gross
written premiums of $3,300,636, and
earned premiums of $166,200. TAL is
subject to regulation by HIDOI, which
requires that at least 100% of TAL’s
reserves be in some combination of
cash, letters of credit, investments in
approved investment policy, premiums
in the course of collection, or other
forms approved by HIDOI.
4. The Plans are welfare benefit plans
that provide basic and supplemental
group term life insurance and basic and
supplemental AD&D coverage to active
full-time and part-time employees of
Intel. The Plans are funded through
insurance.
Intel’s general full-time employees,
part-time employees, and contract
employees are automatically enrolled in
the basic Life Plan and the basic AD&D
Plan. These employees are eligible to
participate in supplemental and
dependent coverage, regardless of age,
sex, salary or position. The Life Plan
had approximately 48,717 participants,
as of August 31, 2012. Basic group term
life insurance is paid for by Intel
through employer premium
contributions.
5. Under the terms of the Life Plan,
basic group term life insurance is
available to active full-time and contract
employees at two times eligible annual
earnings, multiplied by 100% and then
rounded to the next higher $1,000 if not
already a multiple thereof, subject to a
maximum of $1,000,000 of coverage. For
example, according to the Summary
Plan Description (SPD) for the Life Plan,
an employee earning $25,000 per year
would have ‘‘basic life amount’’
coverage of $50,000, an employee
earning $50,000 per year would have
‘‘basic life amount’’ coverage of
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
$100,000, and so forth up to the
maximum of $1,000,000.
In addition, basic group term life
insurance is available to active part-time
employees at two times full-time
equivalent eligible annual earnings,
multiplied by 62.5% and then rounded
to the next higher $1,000 if not already
a multiple thereof, subject to a
maximum of $1,000,000 of coverage. For
example, an employee earning $25,000
per year would have ‘‘basic life amount’’
coverage of $32,000, an employee
earning $50,000 per year would have
‘‘basic life amount’’ coverage of $63,000,
and so forth up to the maximum of
$1,000,000.
6. The Life Plan also provides
supplemental group term life coverage
to full-time and part-time employees of
Intel, but not to Intel contract
employees. Under the current terms of
the Life Plan, basic supplemental life
insurance is available to active full-time
employees at one to seven times annual
earnings as elected by the employee,
multiplied by 100% and then rounded
to the next higher $1,000 if not already
a multiple thereof, subject to a
maximum of $2,000,000. Basic
supplemental life insurance is available
to active part-time employees at one to
seven times annual earnings as elected
by the employee, multiplied by 62.5%
and then rounded to the next higher
$1,000, if not already a multiple thereof,
subject to a maximum of $2,000,000.
Supplemental insurance is paid for by
Intel’s employees through premium
contributions. All insurance terminates
at retirement, except as provided for
under the portability provision found in
the SPD of the Life Plan.
7. The Life Plan further provides
supplemental dependent term life
insurance to full-time and part-time
employees of Intel. Contract employees
are not eligible for this coverage.
Dependent term life insurance for the
spouses and domestic partners of Intel’s
employees is available to active fulltime and part-time employees in the
following amounts: $20,000, $50,000,
$100,000, $150,000, $200,000 or
$250,000, as elected by the employee.
Dependent term life insurance for the
children of Intel’s employees is
available to active full-time and parttime employees in the following
amounts: $5,000, $10,000, $15,000 or
$20,000, as elected by the employee.
Dependent term life insurance
coverage is paid for by Intel’s employees
through premium contributions. All
dependent insurance terminates upon
the employee’s retirement except as
provided under the portability provision
found in the Plans’ SPD.
E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM
06NON1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 6, 2013 / Notices
8. Under the terms of the AD&D Plan,
basic AD&D insurance is available to
active full-time and contract employees
of Intel at two times the employee’s
eligible annual earnings, multiplied by
100%, and then rounded to the next
higher $1,000, if not already a multiple
thereof. Such AD&D coverage is subject
to a maximum of $1,000,000 of
coverage. In addition, basic AD&D
insurance is available to active part-time
employees of Intel at two times the
employee’s annual earnings, multiplied
by 62.5% and then rounded to the next
higher $1,000, if not already a multiple
thereof. Such AD&D coverage is also
subject to a maximum of $1,000,000. All
basic AD&D insurance that is available
to Intel employees is non-contributory
insurance, which means that the
employer is required to make premium
contributions.
9. The AD&D Plan also provides
supplemental AD&D insurance to fulltime and part-time employees of Intel,
but not to Intel’s contract employees.
AD&D supplemental coverage is
available to an active full-time employee
at one to seven times the annual
earnings as elected by the employee,
multiplied by 100% and then rounded
to the next higher $1,000 if not already
a multiple thereof. The maximum
amount of coverage for an active fulltime Intel employee is $1,000,000.
AD&D coverage is also available to an
active part-time employee of Intel at one
to seven times the employee’s full-time
equivalent eligible annual earnings,
multiplied by 62.5% and then rounded
to the next higher $1,000, if not already
a multiple thereof. The maximum
amount of coverage is capped at
$1,000,000.
Under the current terms of the AD&D
Plan, all supplemental AD&D insurance
is paid for by Intel’s employees through
premium contributions. Therefore,
supplemental AD&D insurance is
contributory insurance, which means
that the employee is required to make
premium contributions. All AD&D
insurance terminates at retirement,
except as provided for under the
portability provision found in the SPD.
There are 48,437 participants in the
basic AD&D Plan, of which 21,202
participants have elected supplemental
AD&D coverage.
10. The AD&D Plan further provides
insurance coverage to dependents of
full-time and part-time employees of
Intel, but not to dependents of Intel’s
contract employees. Dependent AD&D
insurance for the spouses, domestic
partners and children of Intel’s
employees is available to active fulltime and part-time employees in the
following amounts: (a) Option 1:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:25 Nov 05, 2013
Jkt 232001
spouse/same sex domestic partner
$50,000; child(ren) $10,000; (b) Option
2: spouse/same sex domestic partner
$100,000; child(ren) $20,000; (c) Option
3: Spouse/same sex domestic partner
$150,000; child(ren) $30,000; (d) Option
4: Spouse/same sex domestic partner
$200,000; child(ren) $40,000; and (e)
Option 5: spouse/same sex domestic
partner $250,000; child(ren) $50,000.
Dependent AD&D insurance coverage is
paid for by Intel’s employees through
premium contributions. Benefits will
terminate at the end of the calendar
month in which the dependent is no
longer eligible.
11. From January 1, 2007, until
December 31, 2012, the Plans’ benefits
were insured by the Metropolitan Life
Insurance Company (MetLife). Since
January 1, 2013, MN Life has been
providing direct insurance for the basic
and supplemental group term life
insurance and the basic and
supplemental AD&D coverage offered
under the Plans in accordance with an
agreement MN Life entered into with
Intel. As of September 30, 2012, MN
Life had total assets of approximately
$28.4 billion. MN Life has agreed to a
rate guarantee for a 7 year period
beginning January 1, 2013, through
December 31, 2019. It is represented
that Intel selected MN Life based upon
consideration of relevant factors to the
arrangement, including the
reasonableness of the fees and the
quality and quantity of the benefits
offered. Both MN Life and MetLife are
rated ‘‘A+’’ by A. M. Best.
The Applicant states that the change
in insurance carriers from MetLife to
MN Life has not reduced Intel’s or the
employees’ overall costs for insurance
benefits. The costs remain the same for
both Intel and the employees. However,
the Applicant represents that the change
in carriers has resulted in several
increased benefits for Intel employees,
as described below.
12. Also, on January 1, 2013, MN Life
entered into a reinsurance agreement
with TAL to reinsure up to 100% of the
Plans’ risks with TAL. However, TAL
will not receive any premiums from MN
Life until this proposed exemption is
granted. MN Life’s reinsurance
agreement with TAL (the Reinsurance
Agreement) is ‘‘indemnity only’’—that
is, MN Life will not be relieved of its
liability for benefits under the Plans if
TAL is unable or unwilling to satisfy the
liabilities arising from the reinsurance
arrangement.
13. As TAL is a party in interest with
respect to the Plans, the reinsurance of
the risks associated with the basic and
supplemental group term life insurance
and basic and supplemental AD&D
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66775
coverage offered to the Plans by MN Life
results in the indirect transfer to TAL of
the Plans’ premium payments, which
are plan assets. Section 406(a)(1)(D) of
the Act prohibits the transfer to, or use
by or for the benefit of, a party in
interest, of any assets of a plan.
Accordingly, this proposed exemption,
if granted, would provide relief from the
prohibitions set forth in section
406(a)(1)(D) of the Act for the
reinsurance of risks and the receipt of
premiums therefrom by TAL, in
connection with basic and supplemental
group term life insurance and basic and
supplemental AD&D coverage.
In addition, because the reinsurance
by TAL of such insurance coverage was
contemplated by Intel at the time that
the Plans obtained insurance coverage
from MN Life, such transactions could
constitute violations by Intel of section
406(b) of the Act. In this regard, section
406(b)(1) of the Act prohibits a fiduciary
from dealing with the assets of a plan in
his own interest or for his own account.
Section 406(b)(2) of the Act prohibits a
fiduciary from acting in a transaction
involving plan assets on behalf of a
party whose interests are adverse to
those of the plan. Section 406(b)(3) of
the Act prohibits a fiduciary from
receiving any consideration for his own
personal account from any party dealing
with a plan in connection with a
transaction involving plan assets.
14. With respect to the Reinsurance
Agreement between MN Life and TAL,
the Applicant represents that all eligible
active full-time and part-time employee
participants in the Plans have been
receiving certain increases to their basic
and supplemental group term life
insurance since January 1, 2013. In this
regard, the supplemental group term life
and supplemental AD&D benefit
coverage under the Plans has been
increased. According to the Applicant,
as noted above, Intel employees are
currently eligible to elect up to seven
times their annual salary for
supplemental group term life insurance
and up to six times or seven times their
annual salaries for supplemental AD&D
benefits. Formerly, employees who
elected supplemental group term life
insurance and supplemental AD&D
coverage were eligible to elect up to five
times and six times their annual
earnings, respectively. The maximum
amount of coverage for these benefits
will remain the same (capped at
$2,000,000 for the supplemental group
term life insurance, and $1,000,000 for
the supplemental AD&D insurance).
The Applicant represents that the
insurance premiums employees pay for
these increases will not be raised unless
the employees elect to increase their
E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM
06NON1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
66776
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 6, 2013 / Notices
supplemental life and/or supplemental
AD&D coverage. The Applicant also
explains that if Intel employees seek
supplemental group term life insurance
or AD&D insurance outside of their
respective Plans, they would be doing
so in the individual insurance market of
the state in which they live. In most
states, the employee would be subjected
to individual underwriting, and would
on average, pay higher premiums than
on a group basis.
15. Intel is providing all of its
employees who are participants in the
Plans with access to Ceridian’s Will
Preparation and Legal Services program.
This benefit enhancement includes the
following services: (a) A free 30-minute
initial consultation per legal issue with
an attorney in the Plan participant’s
state of residence; (b) the creation of
various legal documents, such as a will
or a financial power of attorney; (c) a
referral to a local attorney, access to a
variety of legal forms, and access to an
online legal library; and (d) a 25%
discount off an attorney’s normal hourly
rate should an employee retain an
attorney after an initial consultation.
Intel is bearing the cost of this benefit
enhancement.
According to the Applicant,
previously, only Intel employees who
were enrolled in the supplemental
group term life insurance program had
access to the free will preparation
service offered by Hyatt Legal Plans.
16. Further, Intel is providing legacy
planning services to employees to assist
them in their time of need. These
services relate to: (a) Asset distributions;
(b) last wishes; (c) estate planning; (d)
last will and testament; (e) power of
attorney; (f) healthcare directives; (g)
beneficiary designations; and (h)
document locator. Legacy planning
services are provided to all active Intel
employees through secure Web site
access. Intel is bearing the full cost of
this enhancement to the Plan.
17. Finally, Intel is providing new
beneficiary financial counseling services
to beneficiaries of all active employees
as part of the Plan. In effect, eligible
individuals are able to receive financial
services through
PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP. The
beneficiary financial counseling services
(BFC Services) are available to all
beneficiaries receiving life benefits at no
additional cost. The BFC Services
provide the following benefits to
beneficiaries of Intel employees: (a) A
beneficiary guide giving information on
estate issues, survivor benefits, financial
planning and non-financial issues; (b)
eAdvisor, an integrated planning tool
giving beneficiaries access to online
financial calculators, life event guides
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:25 Nov 05, 2013
Jkt 232001
and related services; (c) access to the bimonthly electronic financial planning
newsletter, ‘‘Your Money, Your Future;’’
(d) a computer-generated personalized
financial analysis; (e) ConseLine, an
unlimited toll-free telephone access for
one year on financial planning issues;
and (f) six-months of personal financial
counseling.
Intel states that the benefit
enhancements described above will
impose a financial burden on the
sponsor of the Plans because, with the
exception of employees electing
increased supplemental group term life
and AD&D coverage, Intel will be
bearing the $94,000 annual costs.
18. In connection with this exemption
request, Milliman, Incorporated
(Milliman) has been engaged to act as
the I/F on behalf of the Plans for the
purpose of evaluating, and if
appropriate, approving the subject
transactions. Specifically, William J.
Thomson, FSA, MAAA, Principal and
Consulting Actuary with Milliman has
been appointed to undertake the duties
of the independent fiduciary. In this
regard, Milliman is responsible for
conducting a due diligence review and
analysis of the proposed transactions
and for providing a written opinion as
to whether the arrangement complies
with the Department’s requirements for
an administrative exemption. Milliman
certifies that it is qualified to serve as
the I/F and the personnel who comprise
Milliman are experienced in prohibited
transaction exemptions issued by the
Department. Milliman represents that it
is independent in that it does not have
and has not previously had, any
relationship with any party in interest
(including any affiliates thereof)
engaging in the transactions described
above. Further, Milliman represents that
the gross income it received from Intel,
TAL or MN Life for its fiscal year does
not exceed two percent of its gross
annual income from all sources.
19. In connection with the
transactions that are the subject of this
proposed exemption, Milliman, among
other things: (a) Reviewed a draft of
Intel’s request for an administrative
exemption from the Department; (b)
conferred with Intel’s representative to
discuss the transactions and the Plans;
and (c) conducted such other due
diligence reviews as were deemed
necessary. Milliman also considered the
premiums to be paid by the Plans for the
proposed coverage, and determined that
the premiums were comparable to the
premiums that would have been
charged by a competitor insurer.
Milliman notes that the premium rate
agreed to with MN Life includes a
percentage allocation for non-claims
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
expenses, which expenses here include
fronting fees, expenses and taxes.
20. Milliman has determined that the
reinsurance arrangement will result in
an immediate and objectively
determined benefit in the form of
increased supplemental life insurance
and AD&D benefits, enhanced will
preparation and legal services, and new
legacy planning and beneficiary
financial counseling services to all
participants and beneficiaries of the
Plans. Milliman states that the benefit
enhancements provide a means of
reducing personal financial risks that
may be unavailable to many of the
Plans’ participants as individuals,
which provides a value to these persons
even if they never file a claim.
21. The Applicant represents that the
proposed exemption is administratively
feasible because the reinsurance of the
Plans’ risks under the terms of the group
term life insurance and AD&D coverage
is, among other things, subject to review
by an I/F, which can be audited. In
addition, the Applicant notes that Intel
has and will bear the cost of the
exemption application and of notifying
the interested persons. Further, the
Applicant explains that the proposed
exemption does not require continued
monitoring or other involvement by the
Department.
The Applicant also represents that the
proposed exemption is in the interest of
the Plans because the Plans will pay no
more than adequate consideration for
the insurance contracts with MN Life.
The Applicant further represents that
the proposed exemption is protective of
the rights of the participants and
beneficiaries of the Plans because the
exemption requires the review and
approval of an I/F, at Intel’s expense.
Specifically, the proposed exemption, if
granted, requires that the I/F analyze the
subject transactions and render an
opinion regarding whether certain of the
conditions of the exemption were
satisfied, including that: (a) The Plans
pay no more than adequate
consideration for the insurance
contracts; (b) the Plans pay no
commissions with respect to the direct
sale of such contracts or the reinsurance
thereof; (c) in the initial year of every
contract involving TAL and a Fronting
Insurer, there is an immediate and
objectively determined benefit to
participants and beneficiaries of the
Plans in the form of increased benefits
approximating the increase in benefits
that is effective January 1, 2013, as
described herein, and such benefits
continue in all subsequent years of each
contract and in every renewal of each
contract; and (d) in the initial year and
in subsequent years of coverage
E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM
06NON1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 6, 2013 / Notices
provided by a Fronting Insurer, the
formula used by the Fronting Insurer to
calculate premiums is similar to
formulae used by other insurers
providing comparable coverage under
similar programs. Furthermore, the
premium charge calculated in
accordance with the formula will be
reasonable and comparable to the
premium charged by the Fronting
Insurer and its competitors with the
same or a better rating providing the
same coverage under comparable
programs.
The Applicant states that if exemptive
relief is granted, any Fronting Insurer
will have a financial strength rating of
‘‘A’’ or better from A. M. Best, and the
reinsurance arrangement between the
Fronting Insurer and TAL will be
indemnity insurance only.
Finally, the Applicant notes that
participants and beneficiaries in the
Plans will receive in subsequent years of
every contract of reinsurance involving
TAL and the Fronting Insurer no less
than the immediate and objectively
determined increased benefits such
participant and beneficiary received in
the initial year of each such contract
involving TAL and the Fronting Insurer.
22. In summary, the Applicant
represents that the reinsurance
transactions will meet the criteria of
section 408(a) of the Act since, among
other things:
(a) The Plans will pay no more than
adequate consideration for the
insurance contracts;
(b) No commissions will be paid by
the Plans with respect to the direct sales
of such contracts or the reinsurance
thereof;
(c) In the initial year of every contract
involving TAL and a Fronting Insurer,
there will be an immediate and
objectively determined benefit to
participants and beneficiaries of the
Plans in the form of increased benefits,
and such benefits will continue in all
subsequent years of each contract and in
every renewal of each contract, and will
approximate the increase in benefits
that are effective January 1, 2013, as
described in the Notice;
(d) In the initial year and in
subsequent years of coverage provided
by a Fronting Insurer, the formula used
by the Fronting Insurer to calculate
premiums will be similar to formulae
used by other insurers providing
comparable coverage under similar
programs. Furthermore, the premium
charge calculated in accordance with
the formula will be reasonable and will
be comparable to the premium charged
by the Fronting Insurer and its
competitors with the same or a better
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:25 Nov 05, 2013
Jkt 232001
rating providing the same coverage
under comparable programs;
(e) The Fronting Insurer will have a
financial strength rating of ‘‘A’’ or better
from A. M. Best. The reinsurance
arrangement between the Fronting
Insurer and TAL will be indemnity
insurance only;
(f) The Plans will retain an I/F or
successor to such fiduciary to analyze
the transactions and to render an
opinion that certain relevant
requirements of the proposed
exemption, if granted, have been
satisfied;
(g) Participants and beneficiaries in
the Plans will receive in subsequent
years of every contract of reinsurance
involving TAL and the Fronting Insurer
no less than the immediate and
objectively determined increased
benefits such participant and
beneficiary received in the initial year of
each such contract involving TAL and
the Fronting Insurer;
(h) The I/F will: Monitor the
transactions proposed herein on behalf
of the Plans on a continuing basis to
ensure such transactions remain in the
interest of the Plans; take all appropriate
actions to safeguard the interests of the
Plans; and enforce compliance with all
conditions and obligations imposed on
any party dealing with the Plans; and
(i) In connection with the provision to
participants in the Plans of the
insurance coverage provided by the
Fronting Insurer which is reinsured by
TAL, the I/F will review all contracts
(and any renewal of such contracts) of
the reinsurance of risks and the receipt
of premiums therefrom by TAL and will
determine that the requirements of this
exemption, if granted, and the terms of
the benefit enhancements continue to be
satisfied.
Notice to Interested Persons
It is represented that Intel will notify
interested persons of the publication of
the Notice in the Federal Register by
email and then first class mail to each
such interested person’s most recent
address maintained in the records of the
administrator of the Plans, if the email
is undeliverable. The Notice will also be
posted on Intel’s internal Web site. Such
notification will contain a copy of the
Notice, as it appears in the Federal
Register on the date of publication, plus
a copy of the Supplemental Statement,
as required pursuant to 29 CFR
2570.43(a)(2) which will advise all
interested persons of their right to
comment and to request a hearing. Intel
will provide such notification to all
such interested persons within 10 days
of the date of publication of the Notice
in the Federal Register. Intel will mail
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
66777
the letters within 10 days of the
undeliverable response being received.
All written comments and/or requests
for a hearing must be received by the
Department from interested persons no
later than 50 days after publication of
the Notice in the Federal Register.
All comments will be made available
to the public.
Warning: Do not include any
personally identifiable information
(such as name, address, or other contact
information) or confidential business
information that you do not want
publicly disclosed. All comments may
be posted on the Internet and can be
retrieved by most Internet search
engines.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Blessed Chuksorji-Keefe of the
Department, telephone (202) 693–8567.
(This is not a toll-free number.)
General Information
The attention of interested persons is
directed to the following:
(1) The fact that a transaction is the
subject of an exemption under section
408(a) of the Act and/or section
4975(c)(2) of the Code does not relieve
a fiduciary or other party in interest or
disqualified person from certain other
provisions of the Act and/or the Code,
including any prohibited transaction
provisions to which the exemption does
not apply and the general fiduciary
responsibility provisions of section 404
of the Act, which, among other things,
require a fiduciary to discharge his
duties respecting the plan solely in the
interest of the participants and
beneficiaries of the plan and in a
prudent fashion in accordance with
section 404(a)(1)(b) of the Act; nor does
it affect the requirement of section
401(a) of the Code that the plan must
operate for the exclusive benefit of the
employees of the employer maintaining
the plan and their beneficiaries;
(2) Before an exemption may be
granted under section 408(a) of the Act
and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the Code,
the Department must find that the
exemption is administratively feasible,
in the interests of the plan and of its
participants and beneficiaries, and
protective of the rights of participants
and beneficiaries of the plan;
(3) The proposed exemptions, if
granted, will be supplemental to, and
not in derogation of, any other
provisions of the Act and/or the Code,
including statutory or administrative
exemptions and transitional rules.
Furthermore, the fact that a transaction
is subject to an administrative or
statutory exemption is not dispositive of
whether the transaction is in fact a
prohibited transaction; and
E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM
06NON1
66778
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 6, 2013 / Notices
(4) The proposed exemptions, if
granted, will be subject to the express
condition that the material facts and
representations contained in each
application are true and complete, and
that each application accurately
describes all material terms of the
transaction which is the subject of the
exemption.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 31st day of
October 2013.
Lyssa E. Hall,
Director Office of Exemption Determinations,
Employee Benefits Security Administration,
U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 2013–26506 Filed 11–5–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–29–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security
Administration
[Exemption Application No. D–11672]
Withdrawal of Notice of Proposed
Exemption Involving the Studley, Inc.
Section 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan (the
Plan) Located in New York, NY
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
In the Federal Register dated
November 16, 2012 (77 FR 68842), the
Department of Labor (the Department)
published a notice of proposed
exemption (the Notice) from the
prohibited transaction restrictions of the
Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974, as amended, and from
certain taxes imposed by the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The
Notice concerned the proposed cash
sale by the Plan of an 8.828121%
partnership interest (the Interest) in the
Julien J. Studley N Street Partnership, a
general partnership (the JJS Partnership)
to Studley, Inc. (the Employer), a party
in interest with respect to the Plan.
Subsequent to the publication of the
Notice in the Federal Register, the
Department was informed that Melvin
Lenkin, Edward J. Lenkin and the EJL
Trust, who are unrelated parties with
respect to the Plan, purchased the
Interest from the Plan. Accordingly, the
Department hereby withdraws the
Notice from the Federal Register.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 31st day of
October 2013.
Lyssa E. Hall,
Director, Office of Exemption Determinations,
Employee Benefits Security Administration,
U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 2013–26505 Filed 11–5–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–29–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:25 Nov 05, 2013
Jkt 232001
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
[TA–W–81,387]
Eastman Kodak Company, IPS—
Dayton Location, Including On-Site
Leased Workers From Adecco, Dayton,
Ohio; Notice of Negative Determination
on Reconsideration
On March 2, 2012, the Department of
Labor (Department) initiated an
investigation in response to a Trade
Adjustment Assistance (TAA) petition
filed on behalf of workers and former
workers of Eastman Kodak Company,
IPS-Dayton Location, including on-site
leased workers from Adecco, Dayton,
Ohio (hereafter referred to as ‘‘Eastman
Kodak-IPS-Dayton’’). On May 18, 2012,
the Department denied the petition for
group eligibility to apply for TAA. The
Department’s Notice of negative
determination was published in the
Federal Register on June 6, 2012 (77 FR
33494).
On August 1, 2012, the Department
issued a Notice of Affirmative
Determination Regarding Application
for Reconsideration, applicable to
Eastman Kodak-IPS-Dayton. The
Department’s Notice of affirmative
determination was published in the
Federal Register on August 14, 2012 (77
FR 48549).
On March 19, 2013, the Department
issued a Notice of Termination of
Reconsideration Investigation to
workers and former workers of Eastman
Kodak-IPS-Dayton (TA–W–81,387)
which stated that the worker group on
whose behalf the request for
reconsideration was filed is eligible to
apply for TAA under the amended
certification for TA–W–74,813A. The
Department’s Notice of termination of
reconsideration investigation was
published in the Federal Register on
April 9, 2013 (78 FR 21155).
On June 21, 2013, the Department
issued a Notice of Termination of
Certification applicable to workers and
former workers eligible to apply for
TAA under TA–W–74,813A. The
Department’s Notice of Termination of
Certification was published in the
Federal Register on July 5, 2013 (78 FR
40507). In the Notice of Termination of
Certification, the Department stated that
the reconsideration investigation of TA–
W–81,387 would be re-opened and a
determination on reconsideration would
be issued accordingly.
During the re-opened reconsideration
investigation, the Department contacted
the workers who filed the initial
petition for information and received
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
additional information from one of the
petitioners.
The petition alleges that production of
printers shifted from the Dayton, Ohio
facility to a foreign country. In an
attachment to the petition, the
petitioners state that ‘‘a few years back
our facility . . . shipped the
manufacture of . . . fluid systems and
controllers to . . . China’’; that ‘‘in 2010
a large portion of the print head
refurbishment for the 4″ (four inch)
product line was shipped to . . .
China’’; that ‘‘all of the printed circuit
board production and testing was
moved to China’’; that a ‘‘portion of the
new product under development
(Stream) was moved to Mexico for
manufacture’’ in 2011; that people from
Malaysia spent months in the fall of
2011 ‘‘to learn the processes of
manufacture so equipment can be sent
to their facility in Malaysia’’; and that
‘‘production of the new Stream product
is to be done in Malaysia.’’
During the re-opened reconsideration
investigation, a former worker stated
that separations at the Dayton, Ohio
facility were due to the shift in
production to China and/or Mexico; that
production of ‘‘legacy’’ products were
shifted to a facility in China that builds
cameras and desktop printers; that the
shift of production to China also
resulted in reduced need for ‘‘testing
and repair of new build circuit boards
and electronic assembly’’; that
production of ink jet print systems and
the ‘‘Four Inch’’ product line were
shifted to China; and that, in April 2012,
three of the remaining workers were
separated ‘‘because the remaining repair
work was shifted to a third party
company in the Dayton area.’’
During the re-opened reconsideration
investigation, the Department obtained
updated information from Eastman
Kodak Company regarding operations at
the Dayton, Ohio facility and responses
to the afore-mentioned allegations.
Based on information obtained during
the re-opened reconsideration
investigation, the Department
determines that while there was some
production shift abroad in 2006 to 2008,
no such shift occurred in 2012 and
2013, and that the shift which occurred
during 2006 to 2008 did not contribute
to worker separations at the Dayton,
Ohio facility in 2012 and 2013.
Rather, information obtained during
the reconsideration investigation
confirmed that worker separations at the
Dayton, Ohio facility in 2012 and 2013
have been part of bankruptcy-related
activities, including restructuring and
domestic outsourcing of some services,
and have not resulted in a shift of
production abroad.
E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM
06NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 215 (Wednesday, November 6, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66769-66778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-26506]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security Administration
Proposed Exemptions From Certain Prohibited Transaction
Restrictions
AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security Administration, Labor.
ACTION: Notice of proposed exemptions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains notices of pendency before the
Department of Labor (the Department) of proposed exemptions from
certain of the prohibited transaction restrictions of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA or the Act) and/or the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code). This notice includes the
following proposed exemptions: D-11729, Bank of America Corporation;
and L-11760, Intel Corporation.
DATES: All interested persons are invited to submit written comments or
requests for a hearing on the pending exemptions, unless otherwise
stated in the Notice of Proposed Exemption, within 45 days from the
date of publication of this Federal Register Notice.
ADDRESSES: Comments and requests for a hearing should state: (1) The
name, address, and telephone number of the person making the comment or
request, and (2) the nature of the person's interest in the exemption
and the manner in which the person would be adversely affected by the
exemption. A request for a hearing must also state the issues to be
addressed and include a general description of the evidence to be
presented at the hearing. All written comments and requests for a
hearing (at least three copies) should be sent to the Employee Benefits
Security Administration (EBSA), Office of Exemption Determinations,
Room N-5700, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20210. Attention: Application No., stated in each Notice
of Proposed Exemption. Interested persons are also invited to submit
comments and/or hearing requests to EBSA via email or FAX. Any such
comments or requests should be sent either by email to:
moffitt.betty@dol.gov, or by FAX to (202) 219-0204 by the end of the
scheduled comment period. The applications for exemption and the
comments received will be available for public inspection in the Public
Documents Room of the Employee Benefits Security Administration, U.S.
Department of Labor, Room N-1513, 200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20210.
Warning: All comments will be made available to the public. Do not
include any personally identifiable information (such as Social
Security number, name, address, or other contact information) or
confidential business information that you do not want publicly
disclosed. All comments may be posted on the Internet and can be
retrieved by most Internet search engines.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Notice to Interested Persons
Notice of the proposed exemptions will be provided to all
interested persons in the manner agreed upon by the applicant and the
Department within 15 days of the date of publication in the Federal
Register. Such notice shall include a copy of the notice of proposed
exemption as published in the Federal Register and shall inform
interested persons of their right to comment and to request a hearing
(where appropriate).
The proposed exemptions were requested in applications filed
pursuant to section 408(a) of the Act and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the
Code, and in accordance with procedures set forth in 29 CFR Part 2570,
Subpart B (76 FR 66637, 66644, October 27, 2011).\1\ Effective December
31, 1978, section 102 of Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978, 5 U.S.C.
App. 1 (1996), transferred the authority of the Secretary of the
Treasury to issue exemptions of the type requested to the Secretary of
Labor. Therefore, these notices of proposed exemption are issued solely
by the Department.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Department has considered exemption applications
received prior to December 27, 2011 under the exemption procedures
set forth in 29 CFR Part 2570, Subpart B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August
10, 1990).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The applications contain representations with regard to the
proposed exemptions which are summarized below. Interested persons are
referred to the applications on file with the Department for a complete
statement of the facts and representations.
Bank of America Corporation Located in Charlotte, NC
[Application No. D-11729]
Proposed Exemption
The Department is considering granting an exemption under the
authority of ERISA section 408(a) and Code section 4975(c)(2) in
accordance with the procedures set forth in 29 CFR Part 2570, subpart B
(76 FR 66637, 66644, October 27, 2011).
Section I: Covered Transactions
If this proposed exemption is granted, the restrictions of ERISA
sections 406(a)(1)(D) and 406(b) and the sanctions resulting from the
application of Code section 4975 (including the loss of exemption \2\
by reason of Code sections 4975(c)(1)(D), (E) and (F)) shall not apply
to the receipt of Relationship Benefits by an individual for whose
benefit a Covered Plan is established or maintained, or by his or her
Family Members, from BAC pursuant to an arrangement in which the
Account Value of, or the Fees incurred for services provided to, the
Covered Plan is taken into account for purposes of determining
eligibility to receive such Relationship Benefits, provided that each
condition of Section II of this proposed exemption is satisfied.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Pursuant to Code section 408(e)(2)(A)(for an individual
retirement account or individual retirement annuity); Code section
530(e) (for a Coverdell education savings account); Code section
220(e)(2) (for an Archer medical savings account); or Code section
223(e)(2) (for a health savings account).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 66770]]
Section II: Conditions
(a) The Covered Plan whose Account Value, or whose Fees paid, are
taken into account for purposes of determining eligibility to receive
Relationship Benefits under the arrangement must be established and
maintained for the exclusive benefit of the participant covered under
the Covered Plan, his or her spouse, or their beneficiaries.
(b) The Relationship Benefits offered under the arrangement must be
of a type that a Qualified Affiliate could offer consistent with all
applicable federal and state banking laws and all applicable federal
and state laws regulating Broker-Dealers.
(c) Where Account Values are taken into account for purposes of
determining eligibility to receive benefits under the arrangement, the
Account Values of Covered Plan accounts shall be treated as favorably,
for purposes of satisfying such eligibility requirements, as the
Account Values of other types of customer accounts.
(d) Where levels of Fees incurred are taken into account for
purposes of determining eligibility to receive benefits under the
arrangement, the levels of Fees incurred by Covered Plan accounts shall
be treated as favorably, for purposes of satisfying such eligibility
requirements, as the levels of Fees incurred by other types of customer
accounts.
(e) The Relationship Benefits offered under the arrangement must be
provided by a Qualified Affiliate in the ordinary course of its
business as a Bank or Broker-Dealer to customers who qualify for such
benefits, but who do not maintain Covered Plans with a Qualified
Affiliate.
(f) The combined total of fees for the provision of services to a
Covered Plan is not in excess of reasonable compensation within the
meaning of ERISA section 408(b)(2) and Code section 4975(d)(2).
(g) The investment performance of the investments made by the
Covered Plan is no less favorable than the investment performance of
identical investments that could have been made at the same time by a
customer of BAC who is not eligible for (or who does not receive)
Relationship Benefits.
(h) The Relationship Benefits offered under the arrangement to the
Covered Plan customer must be the same as are offered to non-Covered
Plan customers of Qualified Affiliates having the same aggregate
Account Value or the same amount of Fees generated.
Section III: Definitions
The following definitions apply to this proposed exemption:
(a) The term ``Account Value'' means investments in cash or
securities held in the account for which market quotations are readily
available. For purposes of the exemption, the term ``cash'' includes
savings accounts that are insured by a federal deposit insurance agency
and constitute deposits as that term is defined in 29 CFR 2550.408b-
4(c)(3). The term ``Account Value'' does not include investments that
are offered by BAC (or a Qualified Affiliate) exclusively to Covered
Plans.
(b) The term ``affiliate'' includes any person directly or
indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under common control with
Bank of America Corporation.
(c) The term ``Bank'' means a bank described in Code section
408(n).
(d) The term ``BAC'' means Bank of America Corporation and any of
its affiliates.
(e) The term ``Broker-Dealer'' means a broker-dealer registered
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
(f) The term ``control'' means the power to exercise a controlling
influence over the management or policies of a person other than an
individual.
(g) The term ``Covered Plan'' means an IRA or other savings account
described in section III(j) of this proposed exemption or a Keogh Plan
described in section III(k) of this proposed exemption that is
established with BAC as trustee or custodian.
(h) The term ``Family Members'' means beneficiaries of the
individual for whose benefit the Covered Plan is established or
maintained, who would be members of the family as that term is defined
in Code section 4975(e)(6), or a brother, a sister, or a spouse of a
brother or sister.
(i) The term ``Fees'' means commissions and other fees received by
a Broker-Dealer from the Covered Plan for the provision of services,
including but not limited to: Brokerage commissions, investment
management fees, investment advisory fees, custodial fees, and
administrative fees.
(j) The term ``IRA'' means an individual retirement account
described in Code section 408(a), an individual retirement annuity
described in Code section 408(b), a Coverdell education savings account
described in Code section 530, an Archer MSA described in Code section
220(d), or a health savings account described in Code section 223(d).
For purposes of this proposed exemption, the term ``IRA'' does not
include an employee benefit plan covered by Title I of ERISA, except
for a Simplified Employee Pension (SEP) described in Code section
408(k) and a Simple Retirement Account described in Code section 408(p)
that provides participants with the unrestricted authority to transfer
their balances to IRAs or Simple Retirement Accounts sponsored by
different financial institutions.
(k) The term ``Keogh Plan'' means a pension, profit-sharing, or
stock bonus plan qualified under Code section 401(a) and exempt from
taxation under Code section 501(a) under which some or all of the
participants are employees described in Code section 401(c). For
purposes of this proposed exemption, the term ``Keogh Plan'' does not
include an employee benefit plan covered by Title I of ERISA.
(l) The term ``Qualified Affiliate'' means any person directly or
indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under common control with BAC
that is a Bank or Broker-Dealer.
(m) The term ``Relationship Benefits'' means reduced or no cost
financial products and services, including premium rates of account or
investment interest, discounted rates of interest on loans, reductions
or waivers of otherwise applicable fees and charges, and/or
differentiated servicing.
Summary of Facts and Representations
1. Bank of America Corporation (the Applicant) is a bank holding
company and a financial holding company under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley
Act of 1999 (GLBA). As of December 31, 2011, Bank of America
Corporation and its subsidiaries had total consolidated assets of
approximately $2.1 trillion. The consumer and corporate banking
business of Bank of America Corporation and its affiliates (together,
BAC) is conducted primarily through Bank of America, National
Association (BANA). BANA is a national franchise that includes branch
and electronic banking, consumer lending services, and credit and debit
card services. BAC's brokerage business, conducted primarily through
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (Merrill Lynch),
provides investment services, securities trading, research, and
brokerage services to consumer and corporate customers. Merrill Lynch
is a retail brokerage firm with approximately 17,000 financial advisors
and offices located in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
Together, BANA and Merrill Lynch serve approximately 57 million
consumer and small business relationships and client accounts with more
than $2.2 trillion in net assets. In
[[Page 66771]]
the ordinary course of its business, BAC (including BANA and Merrill
Lynch) provide a range of financial products and services to
individuals including individual retirement accounts (IRAs) described
in Code section 408(a), individual retirement annuities described in
Code section 408(b), Coverdell education savings accounts described in
Code section 530, Archer MSAs described in Code section 220(d), health
savings accounts described in Code section 223(d) and Keogh plans
(i.e., pension, profit-sharing, or stock bonus plans qualified under
Code section 401(a) and exempt from taxation under Code section 501(a)
under which some or all of the participants are employees described in
Code section 401(c)) not covered by Title I of ERISA (each, a ``Covered
Plan'' as defined in the proposed exemption and collectively, the
``Covered Plans''). For purposes of this proposed exemption, the term
``Covered Plan'' includes Simplified Employee Pensions (SEP) described
in Code section 408(k) and Simple Retirement Accounts described in Code
section 408(p) that provide participants with the unrestricted
authority to transfer their balances to IRAs or Simple Retirement
Accounts sponsored by different financial institutions.
Reduced or No Cost Services in Prohibited Transaction Exemptions 93-33
and 97-11
2. The Applicant wishes to offer relationship banking and brokerage
benefits that are similar to the reduced or no cost services
contemplated by Prohibited Transaction Exemptions (PTEs) 93-33 and 97-
11. PTE 93-33 \3\ permits an individual for whose benefit an IRA or
Keogh Plan is established or maintained, or his or her family members,
to receive services at reduced or no cost from a bank under an
arrangement in which the account balance of the IRA or Keogh Plan is
considered when determining eligibility to receive such services. PTE
93-33 permits banks to offer their customers only those services
allowed under applicable federal and state banking laws.\4\ When an
affiliate of the bank offers the service, it must be a type of service
that the bank can offer its own customers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 58 FR 31053 (May 28, 1993), as amended at 59 FR 22686 (May
2, 1994), and as amended at 64 FR 11044 (March 8, 1999).
\4\ In the notice of proposed exemption for PTE 93-2 (PTE 93-33
subsequently amended PTE 93-2), the following examples of
relationship banking services were listed: free checking services,
discounted safe deposit box rents, or free loan closing costs. 56 FR
8365, 8366 (February 28, 1991). In addition, the Department notes
that a bank may offer other services or benefits to customers as
part of its relationship banking program. For example, under PTE 93-
33 a bank may offer its relationship banking customers a higher
interest rate on their investments, provided the conditions of the
exemption are met.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. PTE 97-11 \5\ permits an individual for whose benefit an IRA or
Keogh Plan is established or maintained, or his or her family members,
to receive services at reduced or no cost from a broker-dealer
registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 under an
arrangement in which the account value or the fees incurred for
services provided to the IRA or Keogh Plan is considered when
determining eligibility to receive such services. PTE 97-11 limits the
services that broker-dealers may offer under a relationship brokerage
program to services that are permitted under federal and state laws
regulating broker-dealers.\6\ Furthermore, when an affiliate of the
broker-dealer offers the services, the services must be a type that the
broker-dealer can offer its own customers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 62 FR 5855 (February 7, 1997), as amended at 64 FR 11042
(March 8, 1999), and as amended at 67 FR 76425 (December 12, 2002).
\6\ In the notice of proposed exemption for PTE 97-11, the
following examples of relationship brokerage services were listed:
financial planning services, direct deposit/debit and automatic fund
transfer privileges, enhanced account statements, toll-free access
to client service centers, check writing privileges, debit/credit
cards, special newsletters, and reduced brokerage and asset
management fees. 61 FR 39996, 39997 (July 31, 1996). In addition,
the Department notes that a broker-dealer may offer its customers
additional services and benefits as part of its relationship
brokerage program. For example, under PTE 97-11, a broker-dealer may
offer its relationship brokerage customers a higher interest rate on
their investments, provided the conditions of the exemption are met.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. PTEs 93-33 and 97-11 provide relief from the restrictions of
ERISA sections 406(a)(1)(D) and 406(b) and the sanctions resulting from
the application of Code section 4975, including the loss of exemption
of an individual retirement account under Code section 408(e)(2) by
reason of Code section 4975(c)(1)(D), (E) and (F), for individuals for
whose benefit an IRA or Keogh Plan is established or maintained.
5. The Applicant states that BAC's decision to offer relationship
banking and brokerage benefits reflects the important changes that have
occurred in the financial industry since PTEs 93-33 and 97-11 were
issued. In this regard, the Applicant notes that PTEs 93-33 and 97-11
were granted by the Department prior to the enactment of the GLBA. The
Applicant represents that the GLBA altered the U.S. legal and
regulatory framework governing the operations of U.S. bank holding
companies such as Bank of America Corporation. The GLBA permits bank
holding companies that qualify as ``financial holding companies''--
including the Applicant--to affiliate broadly with various types of
financial services firms, including full service broker-dealers.
Furthermore, the enactment of the GLBA greatly facilitated financial
services integration in the United States and growth of bank-affiliated
securities operations.
6. According to the Applicant, another significant U.S. regulatory
development occurred in 1995 when the U.S. Federal Reserve Board (FRB)
adopted a rule regarding inter-affiliate ``combined-balance discount
service programs'' offered to individual customers of banks and bank
affiliates. In particular, the rule established a safe harbor from the
statutory restrictions on bank tying arrangements so that banks have
greater flexibility to package products with their affiliates. The
Applicant represents that the rule validated the ability of banks and
their broker-dealer affiliates to offer combined-balance discount
programs (that meet the safe harbor requirements) to their customers.
Furthermore, the Applicant represents that in 1997, the FRB reaffirmed
the safe harbor when it re-wrote its Regulation Y, which includes a
section dealing with anti-tying restrictions. The Applicant represents
that the relationship banking and brokerage benefits described in this
proposed exemption meet the safe harbor.
7. In 2008, the Department granted an individual exemption, PTE
2008-02,\7\ to Citigroup Inc. (Citigroup) that provides relief similar
to PTEs 93-33 and 97-11. Under the exemption, individuals for whose
benefit an IRA or Keogh Plan is established or maintained, and their
family members, can receive both banking and brokerage services at
reduced or no cost under an arrangement in which the account value of,
or the fees incurred for services provided to, the IRA or Keogh Plan is
taken into account for purposes of determining eligibility to receive
such services. As part of the arrangement, Citigroup contemplated
providing services such as: Reductions or waivers of fees for services
such as checking, ATM, investment advisory and account opening or
maintenance fees; preferred lending rates; premium interest crediting
rates; credit or debit cards providing services such as enhanced
mileage accumulation and reward point features; and the provision of
investment information and seminars
[[Page 66772]]
that are available on an invitation-only basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 73 FR 3280 (January 17, 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Transactions
8. In 2009, the Applicant acquired Merrill Lynch, which operates a
significant retail securities business. As a result, BAC developed
programs that link retail banking services with retail brokerage
services. Under these programs, the Applicant's affiliates are able to
consider a customer's combined balance maintained with the Applicants's
affiliates to determine the customer's eligibility to receive various
benefits including bank and broker-dealer products and services at
reduced or no cost. The Applicant does not believe these arrangements
clearly fall within the relief provided by PTEs 93-33 and 97-11.
Therefore, the Applicant requests an exemption to permit the receipt of
certain benefits by an individual for whose benefit a Covered Plan is
established or maintained, or his or her family members, from BAC,
pursuant to an arrangement in which the account value of or the fees
incurred for services provided to the Covered Plan, is taken into
account for purposes of determining eligibility to receive such
products and services. The Applicant represents that these products and
services (Relationship Benefits) are defined as reduced or no cost
financial products and services, including premium rates of account or
investment interest, discounted rates of interest on loans, reductions
or waivers of otherwise applicable fees and charges, and/or
differentiated servicing. More specifically, the Relationship Benefits
will include: (1) Higher interest rates on products such as checking
accounts, savings accounts and certificates of deposit; (2) services
with reduced cost or value added features such as reductions or waivers
of fees on checking accounts and ATM access, reduced or waived
investment advisory and account opening or maintenance fees, reduced or
waived securities trading commissions, and preferred lending rates; (3)
credit or debit cards that provide services such as enhanced mileage
accumulation and reward points features; (4) access to enhanced
customer support services; and/or (5) investment information and
seminars that are available on an invitation-only basis. Differentiated
servicing refers to the provision of an enhanced level of customer
service relative to that which would otherwise be provided, such as
reduced customer service wait times, access to specialized customer
support representatives, specialized newsletters, and similar items.
9. The Applicant offers the following example of a Relationship
Benefits program that could be offered under the proposed exemption, if
granted:
An individual client of BAC is the beneficial owner of an IRA
with assets of $25,000 in a 12-month certificate of deposit, and BAC
is the IRA custodian. The client also maintains a savings account at
BANA with a balance of $10,000; a BANA checking account with a
balance of $5,000; and a brokerage account at Merrill Lynch with a
balance of $20,000. BAC makes a Relationship Benefits program
available to clients that maintain aggregate balances of $50,000 or
more in accounts eligible to participate in the program. Under the
Relationship Benefits program, certain account fees that might
otherwise apply are waived for the eligible accounts of qualifying
clients, and higher interest rates are paid on certain deposit
accounts. Without the exemption proposed herein, the client's IRA is
not an eligible account, so the client fails to qualify for the
program. Consequently, the client's checking account may be charged
a $10 fee for overdraft protection transfers, a $30 fee for stop
payment requests, and/or a $3 fee for receiving images of paid
checks. Additionally, the client's brokerage account will not be
eligible for the 30 free trades per month that would otherwise be
available through the program. Finally, if the client's IRA is not
eligible to participate, the interest rate paid on the savings
account will be 0.15% annual percentage yield (APY) rather than
0.20% APY, and the interest rate paid on the IRA's 12-month
certificate of deposit will be 0.35% APY rather than 0.45% APY. If
the proposed exemption is granted, the client will qualify for
program participation due to the IRA's inclusion as an eligible
account. Therefore, the client will receive more favorable interest
rates and waived fees under the program.
Statutory Findings
10. The Applicant represents that the statutory criteria needed to
grant an exemption under ERISA section 408(a) and Code section
4975(c)(2) will be satisfied. First, the proposed exemption is
administratively feasible because: (1) The conditions and relief of the
requested exemption are comparable to those described in PTEs 93-33,
97-11, and 2008-02; and (2) the requested exemption will not require
continued monitoring or other involvement on behalf of the Department.
Second, the Applicant claims that the proposed exemption is in the
interest of the Covered Plans because the plans will benefit from
access to better products and services available through the
Relationship Benefits program. Finally, the Applicant claims that the
proposed exemption is protective of the rights of the Covered Plan
participants and beneficiaries because:
(a) The Covered Plan whose account value, or whose fees paid, are
taken into account for purposes of determining eligibility to receive
Relationship Benefits under the arrangement will be established and
maintained for the exclusive benefit of the participant covered under
the Covered Plan, his or her spouse, or their beneficiaries.
(b) The Relationship Benefits offered under the arrangement will be
of a type that a qualified affiliate could offer consistent with all
applicable federal and state banking laws and all applicable federal
and state laws regulating broker-dealers.
(c) Where account values are taken into account for purposes of
determining eligibility to receive benefits under the arrangement, the
account values of Covered Plan accounts will be treated as favorably,
for purposes of satisfying such eligibility requirements, as the
account values of other types of customer accounts.
(d) Where levels of fees incurred are taken into account for
purposes of determining eligibility to receive benefits under the
arrangement, the levels of fees incurred by Covered Plan accounts will
be treated as favorably for purposes of satisfying such eligibility
requirements, as the levels of fees incurred by other types of customer
accounts.
(e) The Relationship Benefits offered under the arrangement will be
provided by a BAC affiliate in the ordinary course of its business as a
bank or broker-dealer to customers who qualify for such benefits, but
who do not maintain Covered Plans with a BAC affiliate.
(f) The combined total of fees for the provision of services to a
Covered Plan will not be in excess of reasonable compensation within
the meaning of ERISA section 408(b)(2) and Code section 4975(d)(2).
(g) The investment performance of the investments made by the
Covered Plan will be no less favorable than the investment performance
of identical investments that could have been made at the same time by
a customer of BAC who is not eligible for (or who does not receive)
Relationship Benefits.
(h) The Relationship Benefits offered under the arrangement to the
Covered Plan customer will be the same as are offered to non-Covered
Plan customers of BAC affiliates having the same aggregate account
value or the same amount of fees generated.
Notice to Interested Persons
The Applicant represents that since the number of interested
persons is very large, it will post notice of this proposed exemption
on its principal consumer banking and brokerage Web sites in addition
to publication of this notice in
[[Page 66773]]
the Federal Register. The Department must receive written comments and/
or requests for a public hearing no later than 45 days from the date
this notice is published in the Federal Register.
For Further Information Contact: Mr. Erin Hesse, U.S. Department of
Labor, telephone (202) 693-8546. (This is not a toll-free number.)
Intel Corporation (Intel or the Applicant) Located in Santa Clara, CA
[Application No. L-11760]
Proposed Exemption
The Department is considering granting an exemption under the
authority of section 408(a) of the Act and in accordance with the
procedures set forth in 29 CFR part 2570, Subpart B (76 FR 66637,
66644, October 27, 2011).
Section I. Transactions
If the proposed exemption is granted, the restrictions of sections
406(a)(1)(D) and 406(b) of the Act shall not apply to:
(a) The reinsurance of risks and the receipt of premiums therefrom
by Technology Assurance Limited (TAL), an affiliate of Intel, as the
term ``affiliate'' is defined in Section III(a) below, in connection
with basic and supplemental group term life insurance sold by the
Minnesota Life Insurance Company (MN Life), or any successor insurance
company which is unrelated to Intel (the Fronting Insurer), to the
Intel Group Life Insurance Plan (the Life Plan); and
(b) The reinsurance of risks and the receipt of premiums therefrom
by TAL, in connection with basic and supplemental accidental death and
dismemberment (AD&D) insurance sold by the Fronting Insurer to the
Intel Group Accidental Death and Dismemberment Plan (the AD&D Plan);
\8\ provided the conditions set forth in Section II, below, are
satisfied.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ The AD&D Plan and the Life Plan are together referred to
herein as the ``Plans.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section II. Conditions
(a) TAL--
(1) Is a party in interest with respect to the Plans by reason of a
stock or partnership affiliation with Intel that is described in
section 3(14)(E) or 3(14)(G) of the Act;
(2) Is licensed to sell insurance or conduct reinsurance operations
in at least one ``State,'' as defined in section 3(10) of the Act;
(3) Has obtained a Certificate of Authority from the Hawaii
Department of Insurance (HIDOI), which has neither been revoked nor
suspended;
(4)(A) Will undergo an examination by an independent certified
public accountant for its last completed taxable year immediately prior
to the taxable year of the reinsurance transaction covered by this
proposed exemption, if granted; or
(B) Has undergone a financial examination by the HIDOI within five
(5) years prior to the end of the year preceding the year in which such
reinsurance transaction has occurred; and
(5) Is licensed to conduct reinsurance transactions by Hawaii,
whose law requires that an actuarial review of reserves be conducted
annually by an independent firm of actuaries and reported to the
appropriate regulatory authority.
(b) The Plans pay no more than adequate consideration for the
insurance contracts.
(c) No commissions are paid by the Plans with respect to the direct
sale of such contracts or the reinsurance thereof.
(d) In the initial year of every reinsurance contract involving TAL
and a Fronting Insurer, there is an immediate and objectively
determined benefit to participants and beneficiaries of the Plans in
the form of increased benefits, and such benefits continue in all
subsequent years of each such contract of reinsurance and in every
renewal of each such contract, and will at least approximate the
increase in benefits that will be effective as of the publication of
the final exemption in the Federal Register, as described in this
Notice of Proposed Exemption (the Notice).
(e) In the initial year and in subsequent years of coverage
provided by a Fronting Insurer, the formula used by the Fronting
Insurer to calculate premiums will be similar to formulae used by other
insurers providing comparable coverage under similar programs.
Furthermore, the premium charge calculated in accordance with the
formula will be reasonable and will be comparable to the premium
charged by the Fronting Insurer and its competitors with the same or a
better rating providing the same coverage under comparable programs.
(f) The Fronting Insurer has a financial strength rating of ``A''
or better from A. M. Best Company (A. M. Best). The reinsurance
arrangement between the Fronting Insurer and TAL will be indemnity
insurance only, (i.e., the Fronting Insurer will not be relieved of
liability to the Plans should TAL be unable or unwilling to cover any
liability arising from the reinsurance arrangement).
(g) The Plans retain an independent, qualified fiduciary (the I/F)
or successor to such fiduciary, as defined in Section III(c), below, to
analyze the transactions and to render an opinion that the requirements
of Section II(a) through (f) and (h) of this proposed exemption have
been satisfied.
(h) Participants and beneficiaries in the Plans will receive in
subsequent years of every contract of reinsurance involving TAL and the
Fronting Insurer no less than the immediate and objectively determined
increased benefits such participants and beneficiaries received in the
initial year of each such contract involving TAL and the Fronting
Insurer.
(i) The I/F will: Monitor the transactions proposed herein on
behalf of the Plans on a continuing basis to ensure such transactions
remain in the interest of the Plans; take all appropriate actions to
safeguard the interests of the Plans; and enforce compliance with all
conditions and obligations imposed on any party dealing with the Plans.
(j) In connection with the provision to participants in the Plans
of the insurance coverage provided by the Fronting Insurer which is
reinsured by TAL, the I/F will review all contracts (and any renewal of
such contracts) of the reinsurance of risks and the receipt of premiums
therefrom by TAL and must determine that the requirements of this
exemption, if granted, and the terms of the increased benefits continue
to be satisfied.
Section III. Definitions
(a) The term ``affiliate'' of a person includes any person directly
or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, controlling,
controlled by, or under common control with the person;
(b) The term ``control'' means the power to exercise a controlling
influence over the management or policies of a person other than an
individual.
(c) The term ``I/F'' describes a person, or a successor to such
person, who is not Intel or TAL or an affiliate of either entity; and:
(1) Does not have an ownership interest in Intel, in TAL, or in an
affiliate of either;
(2) Is not a fiduciary with respect to the Plans prior to its
appointment to serve as the I/F;
(3) Has acknowledged in writing acceptance of fiduciary
responsibility and has agreed not to participate in any decision with
respect to any transaction in which it has an interest that might
affect its best judgment as a fiduciary; and
[[Page 66774]]
(4) Has appropriate training, experience, and facilities to act on
behalf of the Plans regarding the subject transactions in accordance
with the fiduciary duties and responsibilities prescribed by the Act.
For purposes of this definition of an ``I/F,'' no organization or
individual may serve as an I/F for any fiscal year if the gross income
received by such organization or individual (or partnership or
corporation of which such individual is an officer, director, or 10
percent or more partner or shareholder) for that fiscal year exceeds
two percent (2%) of that organization's or individual's annual gross
income from all sources for the prior fiscal year from Intel or from
TAL, or from an affiliate of either (including amounts received for
services as I/F under any prohibited transaction exemption granted by
the Department).
In addition, no organization or individual who is an I/F, and no
partnership or corporation of which such organization or individual is
an officer, director, or 10 percent (10%) or more partner or
shareholder, may acquire any property from, sell any property to, or
borrow any funds from Intel or from TAL, or from any affiliate of
either during the period that such organization or individual serves as
an I/F, and continuing for a period of six (6) months after such
organization or individual ceases to be the I/F, or negotiates any such
transaction during the period that such organization or individual
serves as the I/F.
In the event a successor I/F is appointed to represent the
interests of the Plans with respect to the subject transactions, there
may be no lapse in time between the resignation or termination of the
former I/F and the appointment of the successor I/F.
Summary of Facts and Representations
1. Intel, which is headquartered in Santa Clara, California,
develops advanced integrated digital technology products (primarily
integrated circuits) for industries such as computing and
communications. Intel also designs and manufactures computing and
communications components, wireless and wired connectivity products, as
well as platforms that incorporate these components.
For the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012, Intel earned revenue
of $53.3 billion and net income of $11.0 billion. Intel reported a
global employee workforce of 101,671 as of December 31, 2011 (with
approximately 55,500 employees in the United States). Intel is a party
in interest with respect to the Plans, pursuant to section 3(14)(C) of
the Act, as an employer whose employees are covered by the Plans.
2. TAL is an insurance company that is wholly owned by Intel. TAL
was originally incorporated in Hawaii on August 5, 2004, and
subsequently licensed to commence business on September 1, 2004, for
the purpose of reinsuring property and casualty risks of Intel. TAL is
a party in interest with respect to the Plans pursuant to section
3(14)(G) of the Act because it is a corporation of which 50 percent
(50%) or more of the combined voting power of all classes of stock
entitled to vote is owned directly or indirectly held by Intel, an
employer any of whose employees are covered by the Plans, as described
in section 3(14)(C) of the Act.
3. TAL writes Intel's Terrorism Risk Insurance Act coverage to
Intel and its subsidiaries. For the period and year-to-date ended
December 31, 2012, TAL reported total assets of $9,570,558, gross
written premiums of $3,300,636, and earned premiums of $166,200. TAL is
subject to regulation by HIDOI, which requires that at least 100% of
TAL's reserves be in some combination of cash, letters of credit,
investments in approved investment policy, premiums in the course of
collection, or other forms approved by HIDOI.
4. The Plans are welfare benefit plans that provide basic and
supplemental group term life insurance and basic and supplemental AD&D
coverage to active full-time and part-time employees of Intel. The
Plans are funded through insurance.
Intel's general full-time employees, part-time employees, and
contract employees are automatically enrolled in the basic Life Plan
and the basic AD&D Plan. These employees are eligible to participate in
supplemental and dependent coverage, regardless of age, sex, salary or
position. The Life Plan had approximately 48,717 participants, as of
August 31, 2012. Basic group term life insurance is paid for by Intel
through employer premium contributions.
5. Under the terms of the Life Plan, basic group term life
insurance is available to active full-time and contract employees at
two times eligible annual earnings, multiplied by 100% and then rounded
to the next higher $1,000 if not already a multiple thereof, subject to
a maximum of $1,000,000 of coverage. For example, according to the
Summary Plan Description (SPD) for the Life Plan, an employee earning
$25,000 per year would have ``basic life amount'' coverage of $50,000,
an employee earning $50,000 per year would have ``basic life amount''
coverage of $100,000, and so forth up to the maximum of $1,000,000.
In addition, basic group term life insurance is available to active
part-time employees at two times full-time equivalent eligible annual
earnings, multiplied by 62.5% and then rounded to the next higher
$1,000 if not already a multiple thereof, subject to a maximum of
$1,000,000 of coverage. For example, an employee earning $25,000 per
year would have ``basic life amount'' coverage of $32,000, an employee
earning $50,000 per year would have ``basic life amount'' coverage of
$63,000, and so forth up to the maximum of $1,000,000.
6. The Life Plan also provides supplemental group term life
coverage to full-time and part-time employees of Intel, but not to
Intel contract employees. Under the current terms of the Life Plan,
basic supplemental life insurance is available to active full-time
employees at one to seven times annual earnings as elected by the
employee, multiplied by 100% and then rounded to the next higher $1,000
if not already a multiple thereof, subject to a maximum of $2,000,000.
Basic supplemental life insurance is available to active part-time
employees at one to seven times annual earnings as elected by the
employee, multiplied by 62.5% and then rounded to the next higher
$1,000, if not already a multiple thereof, subject to a maximum of
$2,000,000.
Supplemental insurance is paid for by Intel's employees through
premium contributions. All insurance terminates at retirement, except
as provided for under the portability provision found in the SPD of the
Life Plan.
7. The Life Plan further provides supplemental dependent term life
insurance to full-time and part-time employees of Intel. Contract
employees are not eligible for this coverage. Dependent term life
insurance for the spouses and domestic partners of Intel's employees is
available to active full-time and part-time employees in the following
amounts: $20,000, $50,000, $100,000, $150,000, $200,000 or $250,000, as
elected by the employee. Dependent term life insurance for the children
of Intel's employees is available to active full-time and part-time
employees in the following amounts: $5,000, $10,000, $15,000 or
$20,000, as elected by the employee.
Dependent term life insurance coverage is paid for by Intel's
employees through premium contributions. All dependent insurance
terminates upon the employee's retirement except as provided under the
portability provision found in the Plans' SPD.
[[Page 66775]]
8. Under the terms of the AD&D Plan, basic AD&D insurance is
available to active full-time and contract employees of Intel at two
times the employee's eligible annual earnings, multiplied by 100%, and
then rounded to the next higher $1,000, if not already a multiple
thereof. Such AD&D coverage is subject to a maximum of $1,000,000 of
coverage. In addition, basic AD&D insurance is available to active
part-time employees of Intel at two times the employee's annual
earnings, multiplied by 62.5% and then rounded to the next higher
$1,000, if not already a multiple thereof. Such AD&D coverage is also
subject to a maximum of $1,000,000. All basic AD&D insurance that is
available to Intel employees is non-contributory insurance, which means
that the employer is required to make premium contributions.
9. The AD&D Plan also provides supplemental AD&D insurance to full-
time and part-time employees of Intel, but not to Intel's contract
employees. AD&D supplemental coverage is available to an active full-
time employee at one to seven times the annual earnings as elected by
the employee, multiplied by 100% and then rounded to the next higher
$1,000 if not already a multiple thereof. The maximum amount of
coverage for an active full-time Intel employee is $1,000,000. AD&D
coverage is also available to an active part-time employee of Intel at
one to seven times the employee's full-time equivalent eligible annual
earnings, multiplied by 62.5% and then rounded to the next higher
$1,000, if not already a multiple thereof. The maximum amount of
coverage is capped at $1,000,000.
Under the current terms of the AD&D Plan, all supplemental AD&D
insurance is paid for by Intel's employees through premium
contributions. Therefore, supplemental AD&D insurance is contributory
insurance, which means that the employee is required to make premium
contributions. All AD&D insurance terminates at retirement, except as
provided for under the portability provision found in the SPD. There
are 48,437 participants in the basic AD&D Plan, of which 21,202
participants have elected supplemental AD&D coverage.
10. The AD&D Plan further provides insurance coverage to dependents
of full-time and part-time employees of Intel, but not to dependents of
Intel's contract employees. Dependent AD&D insurance for the spouses,
domestic partners and children of Intel's employees is available to
active full-time and part-time employees in the following amounts: (a)
Option 1: spouse/same sex domestic partner $50,000; child(ren) $10,000;
(b) Option 2: spouse/same sex domestic partner $100,000; child(ren)
$20,000; (c) Option 3: Spouse/same sex domestic partner $150,000;
child(ren) $30,000; (d) Option 4: Spouse/same sex domestic partner
$200,000; child(ren) $40,000; and (e) Option 5: spouse/same sex
domestic partner $250,000; child(ren) $50,000. Dependent AD&D insurance
coverage is paid for by Intel's employees through premium
contributions. Benefits will terminate at the end of the calendar month
in which the dependent is no longer eligible.
11. From January 1, 2007, until December 31, 2012, the Plans'
benefits were insured by the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
(MetLife). Since January 1, 2013, MN Life has been providing direct
insurance for the basic and supplemental group term life insurance and
the basic and supplemental AD&D coverage offered under the Plans in
accordance with an agreement MN Life entered into with Intel. As of
September 30, 2012, MN Life had total assets of approximately $28.4
billion. MN Life has agreed to a rate guarantee for a 7 year period
beginning January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2019. It is represented
that Intel selected MN Life based upon consideration of relevant
factors to the arrangement, including the reasonableness of the fees
and the quality and quantity of the benefits offered. Both MN Life and
MetLife are rated ``A+'' by A. M. Best.
The Applicant states that the change in insurance carriers from
MetLife to MN Life has not reduced Intel's or the employees' overall
costs for insurance benefits. The costs remain the same for both Intel
and the employees. However, the Applicant represents that the change in
carriers has resulted in several increased benefits for Intel
employees, as described below.
12. Also, on January 1, 2013, MN Life entered into a reinsurance
agreement with TAL to reinsure up to 100% of the Plans' risks with TAL.
However, TAL will not receive any premiums from MN Life until this
proposed exemption is granted. MN Life's reinsurance agreement with TAL
(the Reinsurance Agreement) is ``indemnity only''--that is, MN Life
will not be relieved of its liability for benefits under the Plans if
TAL is unable or unwilling to satisfy the liabilities arising from the
reinsurance arrangement.
13. As TAL is a party in interest with respect to the Plans, the
reinsurance of the risks associated with the basic and supplemental
group term life insurance and basic and supplemental AD&D coverage
offered to the Plans by MN Life results in the indirect transfer to TAL
of the Plans' premium payments, which are plan assets. Section
406(a)(1)(D) of the Act prohibits the transfer to, or use by or for the
benefit of, a party in interest, of any assets of a plan. Accordingly,
this proposed exemption, if granted, would provide relief from the
prohibitions set forth in section 406(a)(1)(D) of the Act for the
reinsurance of risks and the receipt of premiums therefrom by TAL, in
connection with basic and supplemental group term life insurance and
basic and supplemental AD&D coverage.
In addition, because the reinsurance by TAL of such insurance
coverage was contemplated by Intel at the time that the Plans obtained
insurance coverage from MN Life, such transactions could constitute
violations by Intel of section 406(b) of the Act. In this regard,
section 406(b)(1) of the Act prohibits a fiduciary from dealing with
the assets of a plan in his own interest or for his own account.
Section 406(b)(2) of the Act prohibits a fiduciary from acting in a
transaction involving plan assets on behalf of a party whose interests
are adverse to those of the plan. Section 406(b)(3) of the Act
prohibits a fiduciary from receiving any consideration for his own
personal account from any party dealing with a plan in connection with
a transaction involving plan assets.
14. With respect to the Reinsurance Agreement between MN Life and
TAL, the Applicant represents that all eligible active full-time and
part-time employee participants in the Plans have been receiving
certain increases to their basic and supplemental group term life
insurance since January 1, 2013. In this regard, the supplemental group
term life and supplemental AD&D benefit coverage under the Plans has
been increased. According to the Applicant, as noted above, Intel
employees are currently eligible to elect up to seven times their
annual salary for supplemental group term life insurance and up to six
times or seven times their annual salaries for supplemental AD&D
benefits. Formerly, employees who elected supplemental group term life
insurance and supplemental AD&D coverage were eligible to elect up to
five times and six times their annual earnings, respectively. The
maximum amount of coverage for these benefits will remain the same
(capped at $2,000,000 for the supplemental group term life insurance,
and $1,000,000 for the supplemental AD&D insurance).
The Applicant represents that the insurance premiums employees pay
for these increases will not be raised unless the employees elect to
increase their
[[Page 66776]]
supplemental life and/or supplemental AD&D coverage. The Applicant also
explains that if Intel employees seek supplemental group term life
insurance or AD&D insurance outside of their respective Plans, they
would be doing so in the individual insurance market of the state in
which they live. In most states, the employee would be subjected to
individual underwriting, and would on average, pay higher premiums than
on a group basis.
15. Intel is providing all of its employees who are participants in
the Plans with access to Ceridian's Will Preparation and Legal Services
program. This benefit enhancement includes the following services: (a)
A free 30-minute initial consultation per legal issue with an attorney
in the Plan participant's state of residence; (b) the creation of
various legal documents, such as a will or a financial power of
attorney; (c) a referral to a local attorney, access to a variety of
legal forms, and access to an online legal library; and (d) a 25%
discount off an attorney's normal hourly rate should an employee retain
an attorney after an initial consultation. Intel is bearing the cost of
this benefit enhancement.
According to the Applicant, previously, only Intel employees who
were enrolled in the supplemental group term life insurance program had
access to the free will preparation service offered by Hyatt Legal
Plans.
16. Further, Intel is providing legacy planning services to
employees to assist them in their time of need. These services relate
to: (a) Asset distributions; (b) last wishes; (c) estate planning; (d)
last will and testament; (e) power of attorney; (f) healthcare
directives; (g) beneficiary designations; and (h) document locator.
Legacy planning services are provided to all active Intel employees
through secure Web site access. Intel is bearing the full cost of this
enhancement to the Plan.
17. Finally, Intel is providing new beneficiary financial
counseling services to beneficiaries of all active employees as part of
the Plan. In effect, eligible individuals are able to receive financial
services through PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP. The beneficiary financial
counseling services (BFC Services) are available to all beneficiaries
receiving life benefits at no additional cost. The BFC Services provide
the following benefits to beneficiaries of Intel employees: (a) A
beneficiary guide giving information on estate issues, survivor
benefits, financial planning and non-financial issues; (b) eAdvisor, an
integrated planning tool giving beneficiaries access to online
financial calculators, life event guides and related services; (c)
access to the bi-monthly electronic financial planning newsletter,
``Your Money, Your Future;'' (d) a computer-generated personalized
financial analysis; (e) ConseLine, an unlimited toll-free telephone
access for one year on financial planning issues; and (f) six-months of
personal financial counseling.
Intel states that the benefit enhancements described above will
impose a financial burden on the sponsor of the Plans because, with the
exception of employees electing increased supplemental group term life
and AD&D coverage, Intel will be bearing the $94,000 annual costs.
18. In connection with this exemption request, Milliman,
Incorporated (Milliman) has been engaged to act as the I/F on behalf of
the Plans for the purpose of evaluating, and if appropriate, approving
the subject transactions. Specifically, William J. Thomson, FSA, MAAA,
Principal and Consulting Actuary with Milliman has been appointed to
undertake the duties of the independent fiduciary. In this regard,
Milliman is responsible for conducting a due diligence review and
analysis of the proposed transactions and for providing a written
opinion as to whether the arrangement complies with the Department's
requirements for an administrative exemption. Milliman certifies that
it is qualified to serve as the I/F and the personnel who comprise
Milliman are experienced in prohibited transaction exemptions issued by
the Department. Milliman represents that it is independent in that it
does not have and has not previously had, any relationship with any
party in interest (including any affiliates thereof) engaging in the
transactions described above. Further, Milliman represents that the
gross income it received from Intel, TAL or MN Life for its fiscal year
does not exceed two percent of its gross annual income from all
sources.
19. In connection with the transactions that are the subject of
this proposed exemption, Milliman, among other things: (a) Reviewed a
draft of Intel's request for an administrative exemption from the
Department; (b) conferred with Intel's representative to discuss the
transactions and the Plans; and (c) conducted such other due diligence
reviews as were deemed necessary. Milliman also considered the premiums
to be paid by the Plans for the proposed coverage, and determined that
the premiums were comparable to the premiums that would have been
charged by a competitor insurer. Milliman notes that the premium rate
agreed to with MN Life includes a percentage allocation for non-claims
expenses, which expenses here include fronting fees, expenses and
taxes.
20. Milliman has determined that the reinsurance arrangement will
result in an immediate and objectively determined benefit in the form
of increased supplemental life insurance and AD&D benefits, enhanced
will preparation and legal services, and new legacy planning and
beneficiary financial counseling services to all participants and
beneficiaries of the Plans. Milliman states that the benefit
enhancements provide a means of reducing personal financial risks that
may be unavailable to many of the Plans' participants as individuals,
which provides a value to these persons even if they never file a
claim.
21. The Applicant represents that the proposed exemption is
administratively feasible because the reinsurance of the Plans' risks
under the terms of the group term life insurance and AD&D coverage is,
among other things, subject to review by an I/F, which can be audited.
In addition, the Applicant notes that Intel has and will bear the cost
of the exemption application and of notifying the interested persons.
Further, the Applicant explains that the proposed exemption does not
require continued monitoring or other involvement by the Department.
The Applicant also represents that the proposed exemption is in the
interest of the Plans because the Plans will pay no more than adequate
consideration for the insurance contracts with MN Life. The Applicant
further represents that the proposed exemption is protective of the
rights of the participants and beneficiaries of the Plans because the
exemption requires the review and approval of an I/F, at Intel's
expense. Specifically, the proposed exemption, if granted, requires
that the I/F analyze the subject transactions and render an opinion
regarding whether certain of the conditions of the exemption were
satisfied, including that: (a) The Plans pay no more than adequate
consideration for the insurance contracts; (b) the Plans pay no
commissions with respect to the direct sale of such contracts or the
reinsurance thereof; (c) in the initial year of every contract
involving TAL and a Fronting Insurer, there is an immediate and
objectively determined benefit to participants and beneficiaries of the
Plans in the form of increased benefits approximating the increase in
benefits that is effective January 1, 2013, as described herein, and
such benefits continue in all subsequent years of each contract and in
every renewal of each contract; and (d) in the initial year and in
subsequent years of coverage
[[Page 66777]]
provided by a Fronting Insurer, the formula used by the Fronting
Insurer to calculate premiums is similar to formulae used by other
insurers providing comparable coverage under similar programs.
Furthermore, the premium charge calculated in accordance with the
formula will be reasonable and comparable to the premium charged by the
Fronting Insurer and its competitors with the same or a better rating
providing the same coverage under comparable programs.
The Applicant states that if exemptive relief is granted, any
Fronting Insurer will have a financial strength rating of ``A'' or
better from A. M. Best, and the reinsurance arrangement between the
Fronting Insurer and TAL will be indemnity insurance only.
Finally, the Applicant notes that participants and beneficiaries in
the Plans will receive in subsequent years of every contract of
reinsurance involving TAL and the Fronting Insurer no less than the
immediate and objectively determined increased benefits such
participant and beneficiary received in the initial year of each such
contract involving TAL and the Fronting Insurer.
22. In summary, the Applicant represents that the reinsurance
transactions will meet the criteria of section 408(a) of the Act since,
among other things:
(a) The Plans will pay no more than adequate consideration for the
insurance contracts;
(b) No commissions will be paid by the Plans with respect to the
direct sales of such contracts or the reinsurance thereof;
(c) In the initial year of every contract involving TAL and a
Fronting Insurer, there will be an immediate and objectively determined
benefit to participants and beneficiaries of the Plans in the form of
increased benefits, and such benefits will continue in all subsequent
years of each contract and in every renewal of each contract, and will
approximate the increase in benefits that are effective January 1,
2013, as described in the Notice;
(d) In the initial year and in subsequent years of coverage
provided by a Fronting Insurer, the formula used by the Fronting
Insurer to calculate premiums will be similar to formulae used by other
insurers providing comparable coverage under similar programs.
Furthermore, the premium charge calculated in accordance with the
formula will be reasonable and will be comparable to the premium
charged by the Fronting Insurer and its competitors with the same or a
better rating providing the same coverage under comparable programs;
(e) The Fronting Insurer will have a financial strength rating of
``A'' or better from A. M. Best. The reinsurance arrangement between
the Fronting Insurer and TAL will be indemnity insurance only;
(f) The Plans will retain an I/F or successor to such fiduciary to
analyze the transactions and to render an opinion that certain relevant
requirements of the proposed exemption, if granted, have been
satisfied;
(g) Participants and beneficiaries in the Plans will receive in
subsequent years of every contract of reinsurance involving TAL and the
Fronting Insurer no less than the immediate and objectively determined
increased benefits such participant and beneficiary received in the
initial year of each such contract involving TAL and the Fronting
Insurer;
(h) The I/F will: Monitor the transactions proposed herein on
behalf of the Plans on a continuing basis to ensure such transactions
remain in the interest of the Plans; take all appropriate actions to
safeguard the interests of the Plans; and enforce compliance with all
conditions and obligations imposed on any party dealing with the Plans;
and
(i) In connection with the provision to participants in the Plans
of the insurance coverage provided by the Fronting Insurer which is
reinsured by TAL, the I/F will review all contracts (and any renewal of
such contracts) of the reinsurance of risks and the receipt of premiums
therefrom by TAL and will determine that the requirements of this
exemption, if granted, and the terms of the benefit enhancements
continue to be satisfied.
Notice to Interested Persons
It is represented that Intel will notify interested persons of the
publication of the Notice in the Federal Register by email and then
first class mail to each such interested person's most recent address
maintained in the records of the administrator of the Plans, if the
email is undeliverable. The Notice will also be posted on Intel's
internal Web site. Such notification will contain a copy of the Notice,
as it appears in the Federal Register on the date of publication, plus
a copy of the Supplemental Statement, as required pursuant to 29 CFR
2570.43(a)(2) which will advise all interested persons of their right
to comment and to request a hearing. Intel will provide such
notification to all such interested persons within 10 days of the date
of publication of the Notice in the Federal Register. Intel will mail
the letters within 10 days of the undeliverable response being
received. All written comments and/or requests for a hearing must be
received by the Department from interested persons no later than 50
days after publication of the Notice in the Federal Register.
All comments will be made available to the public.
Warning: Do not include any personally identifiable information
(such as name, address, or other contact information) or confidential
business information that you do not want publicly disclosed. All
comments may be posted on the Internet and can be retrieved by most
Internet search engines.
For Further Information Contact: Blessed Chuksorji-Keefe of the
Department, telephone (202) 693-8567. (This is not a toll-free number.)
General Information
The attention of interested persons is directed to the following:
(1) The fact that a transaction is the subject of an exemption
under section 408(a) of the Act and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the Code
does not relieve a fiduciary or other party in interest or disqualified
person from certain other provisions of the Act and/or the Code,
including any prohibited transaction provisions to which the exemption
does not apply and the general fiduciary responsibility provisions of
section 404 of the Act, which, among other things, require a fiduciary
to discharge his duties respecting the plan solely in the interest of
the participants and beneficiaries of the plan and in a prudent fashion
in accordance with section 404(a)(1)(b) of the Act; nor does it affect
the requirement of section 401(a) of the Code that the plan must
operate for the exclusive benefit of the employees of the employer
maintaining the plan and their beneficiaries;
(2) Before an exemption may be granted under section 408(a) of the
Act and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the Code, the Department must find
that the exemption is administratively feasible, in the interests of
the plan and of its participants and beneficiaries, and protective of
the rights of participants and beneficiaries of the plan;
(3) The proposed exemptions, if granted, will be supplemental to,
and not in derogation of, any other provisions of the Act and/or the
Code, including statutory or administrative exemptions and transitional
rules. Furthermore, the fact that a transaction is subject to an
administrative or statutory exemption is not dispositive of whether the
transaction is in fact a prohibited transaction; and
[[Page 66778]]
(4) The proposed exemptions, if granted, will be subject to the
express condition that the material facts and representations contained
in each application are true and complete, and that each application
accurately describes all material terms of the transaction which is the
subject of the exemption.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 31st day of October 2013.
Lyssa E. Hall,
Director Office of Exemption Determinations, Employee Benefits Security
Administration, U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 2013-26506 Filed 11-5-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-P