Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Options Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Fee Schedule To Include the Series 56 Examination Fee Information, 64258-64259 [2013-25293]
Download as PDF
64258
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 208 / Monday, October 28, 2013 / Notices
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
[Release No. 34–70735; File No. SR–BOX–
2013–49]
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX
Options Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
the Fee Schedule To Include the Series
56 Examination Fee Information
October 22, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on October
16, 2013, BOX Options Exchange LLC
(the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II and III
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the
proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,3 and
Rule 19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,4 which
renders the proposal effective upon
filing with the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule change
to amend the Fee Schedule on the BOX
Market LLC (‘‘BOX’’) options facility to
include the Series 56 examination fee
information. The text of the proposed
rule change is available from the
principal office of the Exchange, at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room
and also on the Exchange’s Internet Web
site at https://boxexchange.com.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
2 17
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 Oct 25, 2013
Jkt 232001
1. Purpose
The Exchange recently amended the
Fee Schedule for trading on BOX to
establish fees for the Proprietary Trader
Program (S501) Continuing Education
Regulatory Element Session.5 The
Exchange now proposes to make a
clarifying change to specify the fee for
the corresponding Proprietary Trader
Qualification Examination (‘‘Series 56’’)
on the Fee Schedule.
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to
add the $195.00 fee per person, per
Series 56 examination to the Fee
Schedule. This fee reflects both the cost
of the examination and the costs
incurred in maintaining and developing
the examination and continuing
education program to ensure their
content is and continues to be adequate
in testing the competence and
knowledge generally applicable to
proprietary trading. The $60.00 per
person, per session fee for the S501
continuing education requirement is
already contained within the Fee
Schedule and the Exchange believes
including both fees in the Fee Schedule
would clarify the full cost of the exam
to Participants. The Series 56
examination is administered by the
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
(‘‘FINRA’’) on behalf of the Exchange.6
The Exchange permits each person
associated with a Participant who is
included within the definition of
Representative to register as a Limited
Representative—Proprietary Trader if
his activities in the investment banking
or securities business are limited solely
to proprietary trading; and he passes the
appropriate Qualification Examination
for Limited Representative—Proprietary
Trader, the Series 56; and he is an
associated person of a proprietary
trading firm.7
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70255
(August 26, 2013), 78 FR 53812 (August 30, 2013)
(Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
SR–BOX–2013–42).
6 Participants would continue to submit the exam
fee, as well as the fee for continuing education, to
FINRA; the Exchange will not invoice or collect
these fees.
7 See Exchange Rule 2020(b)(2)(i). Under
Exchange Rule 2020(e)(2) a proprietary trading firm
is a Participant that trades its own capital, that does
not have customers, and that is not a member of the
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. In
addition, to qualify for this definition, the funds
used by a proprietary trading firm must be
exclusively firm funds, all trading must be in the
firm’s accounts, and traders must be owners of,
employees of, or contractors to the firm.
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Exchange’s Fee Schedule does
not currently set forth the fees
applicable for the Series 7 and its
continuing education program (S101) as
these programs are within FINRA’s
jurisdiction and collected by FINRA
from its members. On the contrary, the
Series 56 and its continuing education
requirements apply to Participants that
are not required by Section 15(b)(8) of
the Act 8 to become a FINRA member.
Therefore, the Exchange believes
including these fees in the Fee Schedule
will clarify the costs related to this exam
and its continuing education.
Additionally, the Exchange proposes
to make clarifying changes to the fee
schedule to make certain that the
differences between these two related
fees, the Series 56 examination fee and
the S501 continuing education fee, are
clear.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposal is consistent with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act,
in general, and Section 6(b)(4) and
6(b)(5)of the Act,9 in particular, in that
it provides for the equitable allocation
of reasonable dues, fees, and other
charges among BOX Participants and
other persons using its facilities and
does not unfairly discriminate between
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
The Exchange is proposing to include
additional information about a relevant
fee for the sake of clarity. On behalf of
the exchanges, FINRA incurs costs in
maintaining and developing the
examination and continuing education
program to ensure their content is and
continues to be adequate in testing the
competence and knowledge generally
applicable to proprietary trading. The
Exchange believes the Series 56
examination fee is reasonable as it is
designed to allow FINRA to cover its
cost of administering the Series 56 exam
program on behalf of the Exchange. The
fee for the Series 56 exam is greater than
the fee for continuing education because
the exam fee is also designed to cover
the costs associated with developing not
just the Series 56 exam, but also the
related S501 continuing education
program. The Exchange also believes
this fee is reasonable because it
understands that other exchanges will
be assessing an identical fee to be
collected by FINRA for the Series 56
exam. In addition, the Exchange
believes this fee is equitably allocated
and not unfairly discriminatory as it
will apply uniformly to all Participants
8 15
9 15
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78o(b)(8).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
28OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 208 / Monday, October 28, 2013 / Notices
Paper Comments
who chose to take the Series 56
examination.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
proposed change is designed to provide
greater specificity and clarity within the
Fee Schedule with respect to the fees
related to the Series 56 exam and does
not impose any burden on intermarket
competition because other exchanges
will be assessing an identical fee for the
Series 56 exam.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action Effectiveness
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Exchange Act 10
and Rule 19b–4(f)(2) thereunder,11
because it establishes or changes a due,
or fee.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend the rule change if
it appears to the Commission that the
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or would otherwise further
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
• Use the Commission’s Internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File
Number SR–BOX–2013–49 on the
subject line.
11 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:52 Oct 25, 2013
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.12
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013–25293 Filed 10–25–13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 8508]
Electronic Comments
10 15
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–BOX–2013–49. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–BOX–
2013–49 and should be submitted on or
before November 18, 2013.
U.S. Department of State Advisory
Committee on Private International
Law (ACPIL)—Online Dispute
Resolution (ODR) Study Group
The Office of the Assistant Legal
Adviser for Private International Law,
Department of State, hereby gives notice
12 17
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64259
that the ACPIL ODR Study Group will
hold a public meeting. The ACPIL ODR
Study Group will meet to discuss the
next session of the UNCITRAL ODR
Working Group, scheduled for
November 18–22, 2013 in Vienna. This
is not a meeting of the full Advisory
Committee.
The UNCITRAL ODR Working Group
is charged with the development of legal
instruments for resolving both business
to business and business to consumer
cross-border electronic commerce
disputes. The Working Group is in the
process of developing generic ODR
procedural rules for resolution of crossborder electronic commerce disputes.
For the reports of the first six sessions
of the UNCITRAL ODR Working
Group—December 13–17, 2010, in
Vienna (A/CN.9/716); May 23–27, 2011,
in New York (A/CN.9/721); Nov. 14–18,
2011, in Vienna (A/CN.9/739); May 21–
25, 2012, in New York (A/CN.9/744);
November 5–9, 2012, in Vienna (A/
CN.9/762); and May 20–24, 2013, in
New York (A/CN.9/769)—please follow
the following link: https://
www.uncitral.org/uncitral/commission/
working_groups/3Online_Dispute_
Resolution.html. Documents relating to
the upcoming session of the Working
Group are available on the same link.
Time and Place: The meeting of the
ACPIL ODR Study Group will take place
on Thursday, November 7, from 12:30
p.m. to 3:00 p.m. EDT at 2201 C Street
NW., Harry S Truman Building, Room
4517. Participants should arrive at the C
Street entrance of the Harry S Truman
Building before 11:30 a.m. for visitor
screening. Participants will be met
inside the building at that entrance and
will be escorted to Room 4517. If you
are unable to attend the public meeting
and would like to participate from a
remote location, teleconferencing will
be available.
Public Participation: This meeting is
open to the public, subject to the
capacity of the meeting room.
Access to building is strictly
controlled. For pre-clearance purposes,
those planning to attend in person are
requested to email at pil@state.gov
providing full name, address, date of
birth, citizenship, driver’s license or
passport number, affiliation, and email
address. This will greatly facilitate
entry. Participants will be met inside
the diplomatic entrance at C Street and,
once badges are obtained, escorted to
the meeting room.
A member of the public needing
reasonable accommodation should
provide an email requesting
accommodations to pil@state.gov no
later than a week before the meeting.
Requests made after that date will be
E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM
28OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 208 (Monday, October 28, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64258-64259]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-25293]
[[Page 64258]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-70735; File No. SR-BOX-2013-49]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Options Exchange LLC; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To
Amend the Fee Schedule To Include the Series 56 Examination Fee
Information
October 22, 2013.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby
given that on October 16, 2013, BOX Options Exchange LLC (the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,\3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\4\
which renders the proposal effective upon filing with the Commission.
The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') a proposed rule change to amend the Fee Schedule on
the BOX Market LLC (``BOX'') options facility to include the Series 56
examination fee information. The text of the proposed rule change is
available from the principal office of the Exchange, at the
Commission's Public Reference Room and also on the Exchange's Internet
Web site at https://boxexchange.com.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange recently amended the Fee Schedule for trading on BOX
to establish fees for the Proprietary Trader Program (S501) Continuing
Education Regulatory Element Session.\5\ The Exchange now proposes to
make a clarifying change to specify the fee for the corresponding
Proprietary Trader Qualification Examination (``Series 56'') on the Fee
Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70255 (August 26,
2013), 78 FR 53812 (August 30, 2013) (Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of SR-BOX-2013-42).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to add the $195.00 fee per
person, per Series 56 examination to the Fee Schedule. This fee
reflects both the cost of the examination and the costs incurred in
maintaining and developing the examination and continuing education
program to ensure their content is and continues to be adequate in
testing the competence and knowledge generally applicable to
proprietary trading. The $60.00 per person, per session fee for the
S501 continuing education requirement is already contained within the
Fee Schedule and the Exchange believes including both fees in the Fee
Schedule would clarify the full cost of the exam to Participants. The
Series 56 examination is administered by the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority (``FINRA'') on behalf of the Exchange.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Participants would continue to submit the exam fee, as well
as the fee for continuing education, to FINRA; the Exchange will not
invoice or collect these fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange permits each person associated with a Participant who
is included within the definition of Representative to register as a
Limited Representative--Proprietary Trader if his activities in the
investment banking or securities business are limited solely to
proprietary trading; and he passes the appropriate Qualification
Examination for Limited Representative--Proprietary Trader, the Series
56; and he is an associated person of a proprietary trading firm.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Exchange Rule 2020(b)(2)(i). Under Exchange Rule
2020(e)(2) a proprietary trading firm is a Participant that trades
its own capital, that does not have customers, and that is not a
member of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. In addition,
to qualify for this definition, the funds used by a proprietary
trading firm must be exclusively firm funds, all trading must be in
the firm's accounts, and traders must be owners of, employees of, or
contractors to the firm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange's Fee Schedule does not currently set forth the fees
applicable for the Series 7 and its continuing education program (S101)
as these programs are within FINRA's jurisdiction and collected by
FINRA from its members. On the contrary, the Series 56 and its
continuing education requirements apply to Participants that are not
required by Section 15(b)(8) of the Act \8\ to become a FINRA member.
Therefore, the Exchange believes including these fees in the Fee
Schedule will clarify the costs related to this exam and its continuing
education.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78o(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, the Exchange proposes to make clarifying changes to
the fee schedule to make certain that the differences between these two
related fees, the Series 56 examination fee and the S501 continuing
education fee, are clear.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act, in general, and Section
6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5)of the Act,\9\ in particular, in that it provides
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other
charges among BOX Participants and other persons using its facilities
and does not unfairly discriminate between customers, issuers, brokers
or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange is proposing to include additional information about a
relevant fee for the sake of clarity. On behalf of the exchanges, FINRA
incurs costs in maintaining and developing the examination and
continuing education program to ensure their content is and continues
to be adequate in testing the competence and knowledge generally
applicable to proprietary trading. The Exchange believes the Series 56
examination fee is reasonable as it is designed to allow FINRA to cover
its cost of administering the Series 56 exam program on behalf of the
Exchange. The fee for the Series 56 exam is greater than the fee for
continuing education because the exam fee is also designed to cover the
costs associated with developing not just the Series 56 exam, but also
the related S501 continuing education program. The Exchange also
believes this fee is reasonable because it understands that other
exchanges will be assessing an identical fee to be collected by FINRA
for the Series 56 exam. In addition, the Exchange believes this fee is
equitably allocated and not unfairly discriminatory as it will apply
uniformly to all Participants
[[Page 64259]]
who chose to take the Series 56 examination.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed change is designed
to provide greater specificity and clarity within the Fee Schedule with
respect to the fees related to the Series 56 exam and does not impose
any burden on intermarket competition because other exchanges will be
assessing an identical fee for the Series 56 exam.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action Effectiveness
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Exchange Act \10\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2)
thereunder,\11\ because it establishes or changes a due, or fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend the rule
change if it appears to the Commission that the action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
would otherwise further the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include
File Number SR-BOX-2013-49 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BOX-2013-49. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BOX-2013-49 and should be
submitted on or before November 18, 2013.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-25293 Filed 10-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P